Skip to main content

Congenital heart disease diagnosed with echocardiogram in newborns with asymptomatic cardiac murmurs: a systematic review

Abstract

Background

More than 50% of newborns with congenital heart disease (CHD) are unrecognized at birth; however, the use of echocardiogram (Echo) for diagnosing CHD in newborns with asymptomatic, non-syndromic cardiac murmurs (ANCM), has not been systematically reviewed yet. We aimed to identify the incidence of CHD diagnosed with Echo and systematically review whether Echo should be recommended in this patient group.

Methods

The methodology utilized in this systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. Using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, we performed a systematic review of publications reporting CHD diagnosed with Echo in newborns with cardiac murmurs. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Study Quality Assessment Tools developed by the National Institutes of Health.

Results

Of the 630 studies screened, six cohort studies, four cross-sectional studies, and two case reports were included in this review. The incidence of cardiac murmurs ranged from 0.6–8.6%. Among the 1928 newborns with ANCM, 719 (37.3%) were diagnosed with Echo as having CHD, and ventricular septal defect was the most common congenital malformation. More than 50% of the newborns showed moderate CHD necessitating outpatient cardiology follow-up, and 2.5% had severe CHD requiring immediate interventions, such as cardiac catheterization and heart surgery.

Conclusions

In this systematic review, a high incidence of CHD in newborns with ANCM was detected using Echo. This indicates that the use of Echo for diagnosing CHD in healthy newborns with cardiac murmurs could be helpful in earlier detection of CHD, thereby improving clinical outcomes for newborns with severe CHD.

Peer Review reports

Background

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of death in newborns [1,2,3]. CHD prevalence in newborns has increased globally, especially in Asia, from 0.6 per 1000 live births to 9.410 per 1000 live births, according to several recent reports [4,5,6,7]. Despite antenatal screening processes using fetal echocardiogram (Echo), more than 50% of newborns with CHD are unrecognized at birth [8,9,10]. As undiagnosed CHD can lead to life-threatening cardiovascular collapse and cardiac arrest, which are the primary causes of death in infants, screening newborns’ cardiac health is vital [8, 11].

Cardiac assessments, including physical examinations, have been performed for newborns after birth; however, the use of Echo for diagnosing CHD, especially in newborns with asymptomatic, non-syndromic cardiac murmurs (ANCM), has been a subject of debate [12,13,14]. Echo, which pediatricians use to evaluate heart function, uses sound waves to produce pictures of the movement of different parts of the heart; thus, it has become the gold standard for diagnosis of CHD in pediatric patients with cardiac murmurs and its use has expanded with advances in technology [15,16,17,18]. Almost all pediatricians agree with performing Echo for newborns with cardiorespiratory symptoms, such as cyanosis and tachypnea; chromosome abnormalities, including Down syndrome; or other non-cardiac anomalies to rule out CHD [19, 20]. The appropriate criteria for the use of Echo in children and adolescents with cardiac murmurs are well established [21,22,23]; however, guidelines for the use of Echo in newborns with ANCM have not yet been reported. Cardiac murmurs are commonly found in newborns and are one of the major signs of potential CHD. Moreover, pediatric cardiac murmur is the primary reason for referral and further evaluations. Therefore, CHD detection in newborns with ANCM is necessary for early diagnosis and timely treatment.

Recently, it has become easy to implement Echo in neonatal care. Previous studies reported variable CHD incidence in newborns with ANCM [24,25,26]; however, there is no consensus on the use of Echo for early detection of CHD in newborns with ANCM. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the incidence of CHD diagnosed with Echo and determine whether Echo should be used in the proper management of CHD in newborns with ANCM.

Methods

This systematic review selected CHD evaluated the usefulness of Echo in identifying CHD in newborn babies with ANCM. No systematic review has yet reported on the incidence of CHD or echocardiographic outcomes in newborns with ANCM.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for published studies in this review were based on the PICOT (population/patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time) study design questions according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [27]. Studies were included if they met the following criteria:

  1. 1.

    included newborns with asymptomatic cardiac murmurs diagnosed by health professionals using echocardiogram,

  2. 2.

    CHD was determined based on initial screening and additional screening methods, such as physical exam, family history, and echocardiogram performed by physicians,

  3. 3.

    study designs included all kinds of clinical trials, such as prospective and retrospective cohort studies, observational studies, case control studies, and case reports, that explored the differential diagnosis from ANCM to CHD based on first and second screenings in full term newborns.

The following studies were excluded: animal studies; reviews, comments, editorials, conference abstracts or papers, letters, and notes; studies without a specified number of cases, that did not perform echocardiogram, or that included symptomatic patients; cases of preterm newborn babies or babies > 28 days old; and studies not in English.

Search strategy

We searched the literature published before 4 March 2019. No restrictions were imposed in terms of publication language, time, or status. We did not restrict publication date because we aimed to maximize the number of potential studies included. Electronic database searches used both free text queries and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. Using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, we performed a systematic review of publications reporting CHD diagnosed with Echo in newborns with cardiac murmurs. Moreover, a grey literature search strategy was adapted, as appropriate, other than the major databases in order for data retrieval as many as possible with the study objectives. The goal of the search strategy was to retrieve all relevant articles related to the topic. For management of the searched literature, Endnote version X7 (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) was used. The details of the search strategies used are provided as an appendix to this review (Additional file 1).

Study selection

Study selection was independently decided by two reviewers based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion among the reviewers. Any remaining disagreements were referred to a third author to achieve a consensus. In addition, study selection included two screening levels. The two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified studies. Subsequently, the investigators retrieved the articles identified by the reviewers for full-text review. Thereafter, the reviewers assessed the reports to ensure that they met the inclusion criteria.

Identification of relevant studies

Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of how the relevant studies were identified. In total, 825 studies were identified by searching four databases and manually searching relevant bibliographies: In total, 786 studies were identified by searching 4 databases and manually searching relevant bibliographies as follows: 182 studies from MEDLINE, 128 from EMBASE, 100 from Cochrane Library, 376 from Web of Science, and 39 by manual searching. We excluded 156 duplicate studies and 610 studies that did not satisfy the inclusion criteria and/or met the exclusion criteria. After reviewing the full texts of the remaining 20 studies, eight studies were further excluded for the following reasons: participants included symptomatic newborns (n = 4) or preterm infants (n = 4) (Additional file 2). Thus, a total of 12 studies were included in the analysis [24,25,26, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].

Fig. 1
figure1

PRISMA flow diagram for identifying articles eligible for inclusion. Flow diagram of the literature search and study selection process

Data extraction and screening methods

Two reviewers independently identified potential studies and extracted detailed information from each article according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6 [37] and the PRISMA screening process [27] (Fig. 1).

The extracted data included indexing information about the article, such as the first author’s name, year of publication, and country where the study was performed; study design; clinical setting; total number of participants; patient demographic information, such as sex and mean age; and findings from initial screenings for CHD, additional examinations for CHD, and echocardiograms. For ANCM, the measured outcome varied among studies. The following designations of abnormal cardiac sounds were extracted from the studies: benign murmurs, possible pathologic murmurs, and pathologic murmurs.

Quality assessment

The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Study Quality Assessment Tools developed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [38]. Two reviewers (S.A.Y. and H.J.C.) scored the studies according to these scales. If the ratings differed, then the authors discussed the article in an effort to reach a consensus.

Results

Study characteristics

Characteristics of the studies and the subjects are summarized in Table 1. Of the included studies, six were cohort studies [25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 33], four were cross-sectional studies [24, 30, 31, 34], and two were case reports [35, 36]. A total of 1928 subjects were included in the 12 studies. Clinical settings varied and included nurseries, neonatal intensive care units (NICU), and outpatient clinics.

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in the final analysis

Synthesis of screening for CHD

Table 2 shows a summary of the initial and additional cardiac evaluations performed in each study. In most of the studies, the first cardiac evaluations were performed within five days of birth by pediatricians. Since 2012, screening newborns using a pulse oximeter has become standard practice [26, 32, 34, 35]. Except in one study [32], additional assessments using Echo were performed by a pediatric cardiologist during the neonatal period before discharge (an additional assessment using Echo performed in an outpatient setting was excluded [30]). Additionally, some studies used chest x-ray [24], electrocardiogram [24, 26, 30, 35], and four-limb blood pressure [26, 35] to further evaluate cardiac murmurs.

Table 2 Summary of the initial screening and additional assessment for cardiac murmurs in asymptomatic newborns

Incidence of ANCM and CHD according to the type of cardiac murmurs

From the eight studies, the incidence of ANCM ranged from 0.6 to 8.6%, and the CHD incidence among infants with ANCM ranged from 2.6 to 74.1% (Table 3). We evaluated CHD incidence according to cardiac murmur designation in three studies [24,25,26]. The incidence of CHD in newborns with pathologic murmurs was higher than in those with benign or possible pathologic murmurs.

Table 3 Asymptomatic newborns with cardiac murmurs and congenital heart disease diagnosed with echocardiogram

Synthesis of echocardiographic outcomes

Of the 1928 asymptomatic newborns with cardiac murmurs who underwent Echo and were included in our study, 719 (37.3%) were diagnosed as having CHD. We classified CHD into four categories according to the anatomical region that produced the murmur: shunt lesions, right side heart lesions, left side heart lesions, and connection lesions (Table 4). Among the newborns with CHD, 56.5% had shunt lesions. The most common CHD was ventricular septal defect (VSD).

Table 4 Echocardiographic outcomes of newborns with cardiac murmur (N = 1928)a

Severity of CHD in newborns with ANCM

Three studies [26, 33, 34] stratified CHD severity according to the level of interventions required (Table 5). Of the 267 newborns in the three studies, nine (3.4%) had critical CHD necessitating immediate intervention, such as heart surgery or cardiac catheterization, before hospital discharge.

Table 5 Severity of congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns with cardiac murmur

Results of study quality assessment

Table 6 shows the results of each study’s quality assessment. Two reviewers rated each study according to the study design using the Study Quality Assessment Tools developed by the NIH. Scoring system was as 2 = yes; 1 = unclear or not applicable; 0 = no. A total score was graded as excellent (75–100%), good (50–75%), fair (25–50%) and poor (0–25%). Among six cohort studies, three [25, 26, 32] scored excellent while the rest [28, 29, 33] were good. Three of four cross-sectional studies [24, 30, 34] were graded as excellent and one was good. Two case reports [35, 36] scored excellent.

Table 6 Appraisal of study quality

Discussion

This is the first systematic review to evaluate the usefulness of Echo for the diagnosis of CHD among newborns with ANCM. We found that approximately 1% of the cohort from the included studies had ANCM, and more than one third were diagnosed as having CHD using Echo. Moreover, the incidence of cardiac murmurs was influenced by the frequency and time of examination as well as the experience and skills of the physicians. Initial screening for murmurs was performed before the first discharge in most of the studies. In the study by Rein et al., cardiac auscultations were performed daily [29]. The level of expertise of the physicians who performed the initial assessments varied (i.e., pediatric residents to neonatologists). Initial cardiac evaluations for newborns consisted of cardiac auscultation, obtaining family history of CHD, and screening with a pulse oximeter, the last of which was added in 2012. Primary cardiac murmur evaluations and Echo were performed simultaneously, except in one outpatient clinic-based study [30]. Regardless of low diagnostic potential, electrocardiogram, chest x-ray, and four-limb blood pressure measurements were performed as additional assessment methods for cardiac murmurs in four studies [24, 26, 30, 35]. In this systematic review, Echo was performed by pediatric cardiologists in all but one study, in which Echo was performed by a neonatologist [32].

CHD incidence varied greatly among the studies, which could be attributable to CHD prevalence variations between different countries [4,5,6]. Information on antenatal ultrasound screening for CHD according to the country where the study was conducted was not available. Only one study reported that the lower CHD incidence in their study compared to previous studies could be attributed to active prenatal detection of most of the major and critical cases of CHD [26]. The incidence of CHD among full term newborns with ANCM found in this systematic review (37.3%) was much higher than the updated prevalence of CHD at birth. Among the subtypes of CHD, shunt lesions such as VSD, atrial septal defect (ASD), and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) were most frequently observed, which is consistent with the worldwide prevalence of CHD at birth [4, 6].

With regard to the severity of CHD in newborns [39], three studies classified CHD severity as follows: mild, moderate, and severe [26, 33, 34]. Of the 267 newborns with CHD in the three studies, 3.4% were diagnosed as having severe CHD and thus required immediate interventions, such as heart surgery or interventional catheterization, before hospital discharge. In this systematic review, even though acyanotic severe heart diseases, such as large VSD, ASD, and PDA as well as critical aortic or pulmonary stenosis, were not included, 2.5% had severe CHD. The majority of the newborns had moderate CHD requiring outpatient cardiology follow-up [24, 26, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].

Cardiac murmurs heard in the first few days of life are mostly associated with physiologic variants, such as peripheral pulmonary stenosis, and typically disappear within 3 to 6 months of life. Cardiac murmurs due to CHD are more easily auscultated after the decrease in pulmonary resistance that occurs after several weeks of life [40, 41]. Nevertheless, we observed a high CHD incidence in the included studies that performed initial cardiac evaluations within five days of life. Generally, pathologic murmurs that are described as louder than 2/6 in intensity, diastolic, and pansystolic and are associated with rubs, clicks, or gallops are relevant to CHD [42, 43]; however, we observed that CHD includes not only pathologic murmurs but also innocent murmurs, such as ANCM. While pathologic murmurs are associated with a higher CHD incidence, newborns with innocent murmurs showed a CHD incidence rate of 0.6–70%.

Among the included studies, only one study described an algorithm in which Echo was performed in all newborns with pathologic murmurs regardless of symptoms and in some newborns with innocent murmurs present > 48 h after birth [32]. Cardiac murmur is the most common reason for referral to a cardiologist and shows a relatively higher Echo diagnostic yield than other indications, such as palpitation or chest pain. Moreover, abnormal echocardiographic findings are most frequently observed within the first year of life among pediatric patients with cardiac murmurs [44]. Although Echo is the gold standard for the diagnosis of CHD and is easily accessible in developed countries, there is no consensus on whether to use Echo in newborns with ANCM. Nevertheless, a few physicians have performed Echo in full term newborns with ANCM [14, 34]. Although there are issues with cost-effectiveness and technical accessibility, Echo is currently widely used, even in the NICU, by neonatologists [45,46,47,48]. New approaches for the utilization of Echo in newborns with ANCM are warranted.

Early diagnosis and timely management of CHD in newborns are critical to improve clinical outcomes [5, 49]. With the increase in artificial fertilization and preterm births, CHD incidence is expected to increase in the future [50]. A thorough cardiac evaluation with careful auscultation before hospital discharge should be performed to screen for CHD. Because accuracy of the assessment of pathologic murmurs varies among physicians [24, 30, 51], a stepwise approach to evaluating cardiac murmurs is required. Considering the difficulties in distinguishing pathologic murmurs from innocent murmurs in newborns, the use of Echo in newborns with ANCM is recommended to prevent further cardiac complications. If access to Echo is limited, early referral to a pediatric cardiologist may be another option.

All studies included in this review were observational studies. A meta-analysis was impossible because of the study designs. However, this systematic review applied a comprehensive and structured search strategy to four different databases. Two reviewers independently performed quality assessment, thereby reducing selection and publication bias.

Conclusion

Recently, Echo is being widely used for heart anatomy imaging and cardiac function evaluation in newborns with normal cardiac structure; thus, guidelines for the use of Echo in newborns with ANCM are warranted. In this systematic review, cardiac murmurs were the most common abnormal findings after physical examinations in newborns and we found that > 37% of newborns with ANCM had moderate to severe CHD diagnosed using Echo. Thus, Echo is a useful non-invasive tool for the detection of cardiac problems in newborns with cardiac murmurs and is an easy diagnostic procedure for CHD. Our study suggests that utilization of Echo in newborns with ANCM would be helpful in early CHD detection, which could in turn improve clinical outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (hong.medric@gmail.com) upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CHD:

Congenital heart disease

echo:

Echocardiogram

ANCM:

Asymptomatic non-syndromic cardiac murmurs

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis

MeSH:

Medical Subject Headings

NIH:

National Institutes of Health

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

VSD:

Ventricular septal defect

ASD:

Atrial septal defect

PDA:

Patent ductus arteriosus

MedRIC:

Medical Research Information Center

NRF:

National Research Foundation of Korea

References

  1. 1.

    Oster ME, Lee KA, Honein MA, Riehle-Colarusso T, Shin M, Correa A. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1502–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sankar MJ, Natarajan CK, Das RR, Agarwal R, Chandrasekaran A, Paul VK. When do newborns die? A systematic review of timing of overall and cause-specific neonatal deaths in developing countries. J Perinatol. 2016;36(Suppl 1):S1–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bairoliya N, Fink G. Causes of death and infant mortality rates among full-term births in the United States between 2010 and 2012: an observational study. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002531.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJ, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2241–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Triedman JK, Newburger JW. Trends in congenital heart disease: the next decade. Circulation. 2016;133:2716–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Liu Y, Chen S, Zuhlke L, Black GC, Choy MK, Li N, et al. Global birth prevalence of congenital heart defects 1970-2017: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 260 studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48:455–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Marelli AJ, Mackie AS, Ionescu-Ittu R, Rahme E, Pilote L. Congenital heart disease in the general population: changing prevalence and age distribution. Circulation. 2007;115:163–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L. Presentation of congenital heart disease in infancy: implications for routine examination. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;80:F49–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hill GD, Block JR, Tanem JB, Frommelt MA. Disparities in the prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:859–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    van Velzen CL, Clur SA, Rijlaarsdam ME, Bax CJ, Pajkrt E, Heymans MW, et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease--results of a national screening programme. BJOG. 2016;123:400–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dorfman AT, Marino BS, Wernovsky G, Tabbutt S, Ravishankar C, Godinez RI, et al. Critical heart disease in the neonate: presentation and outcome at a tertiary care center. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9:193–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kondo M, Ohishi A, Baba T, Fujita T, Iijima S. Can echocardiographic screening in the early days of life detect critical congenital heart disease among apparently healthy newborns? BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:359.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fillipps DJ, Bucciarelli RL. Cardiac evaluation of the newborn. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2015;62:471–89.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Shenvi A, Kapur J, Rasiah SV. Management of asymptomatic cardiac murmurs in term neonates. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34:1438–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rice MJ, McDonald RW, Reller MD, Sahn DJ. Pediatric echocardiography: current role and a review of technical advances. J Pediatr. 1996;128:1–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Frommelt MA, Frommelt PC. Advances in echocardiographic diagnostic modalities for the pediatrician. Pediatr Clin N Am. 1999;46:427–39 xi.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Simpson JM, Miller O. Three-dimensional echocardiography in congenital heart disease. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;104:45–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chitra N, Vijayalakshmi IB. Fetal echocardiography for early detection of congenital heart diseases. J Echocardiogr. 2017;15:13–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Driscoll D, Allen HD, Atkins DL, Brenner J, Dunnigan A, Franklin W, et al. Guidelines for evaluation and management of common congenital cardiac problems in infants, children, and adolescents. A statement for healthcare professionals from the committee on congenital cardiac defects of the council on cardiovascular disease in the young, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1994;90:2180–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hiremath G, Kamat D. When to call the cardiologist: treatment approaches to neonatal heart murmur. Pediatr Ann. 2013;42:329–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Writing Group for Echocardiography in Outpatient Pediatric Cardiology, Campbell RM, Douglas PS, Eidem BW, Lai WW, Lopez L, et al. ACC/AAP/AHA/ASE/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SOPE 2014 appropriate use criteria for initial transthoracic echocardiography in outpatient pediatric cardiology: a report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Pediatric Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:1247–66.

  22. 22.

    Naik RJ, Shah NC. Teenage heart murmurs. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2014;61:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Begic E, Begic Z. Accidental heart murmurs. Med Arch. 2017;71:284–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Azhar AS, Habib HS. Accuracy of the initial evaluation of heart murmurs in neonates: do we need an echocardiogram? Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;27:234–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gokmen Z, Tunaoglu FS, Kula S, Ergenekon E, Ozkiraz S, Olgunturk R. Comparison of initial evaluation of neonatal heart murmurs by pediatrician and pediatric cardiologist. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:1086–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Minocha P, Agarwal A, Jivani N, Swaminathan S. Evaluation of neonates with suspected congenital heart disease: a new cost-effective algorithm. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018;57:1541–8.

  27. 27.

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ainsworth S, Wyllie JP, Wren C. Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiac murmurs in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;80:F43–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Rein AJ, Omokhodion SI, Nir A. Significance of a cardiac murmur as the sole clinical sign in the newborn. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2000;39:511–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mackie AS, Jutras LC, Dancea AB, Rohlicek CV, Platt R, Beland MJ. Can cardiologists distinguish innocent from pathologic murmurs in neonates? J Pediatr. 2009;154:50–4.e1.

  31. 31.

    Mirzarahimi M, Saadati H, Doustkami H, Alipoor R, Isazadehfar K, Enteshari A. Heart murmur in neonates: how often is it caused by congenital heart disease? Iran J Pediatr. 2011;21:103–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Singh A, Desai T, Miller P, Rasiah SV. Benefits of predischarge echocardiography service for postnatal heart murmurs. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:e333–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Al-Ammouri I, Ayoub F, Dababneh R. Is pre-discharge echocardiography indicated for asymptomatic neonates with a heart murmur? A retrospective analysis. Cardiol Young. 2016;26:1056–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fenster ME, Hokanson JS. Heart murmurs and echocardiography findings in the normal newborn nursery. Congenit Heart Dis. 2018;13:771–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ceresnak S, Gray RG, Altmann K, Chen JM, Glickstein JS, Hellenbrand WE. Coronary artery fistulas: a review of the literature and presentation of two cases of coronary fistulas with drainage into the left atrium. Congenit Heart Dis. 2007;2:208–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Paech C, Pfeil N, Wagner R, Kostelka M, Weidenbach M. Aortico-left ventricular tunnel bypassing congenital critical aortic stenosis. Echocardiography. 2013;30:E344–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tools SQA. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethseda. MD. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. .

  39. 39.

    Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1890–900.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chatelain P, Oberhansli I, Friedli B. Physiological pulmonary branch stenosis in newborns: 2D-echocardiographic and Doppler characteristics and follow up. Eur J Pediatr. 1993;152:559–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Arlettaz R, Archer N, Wilkinson AR. Natural history of innocent heart murmurs in newborn babies: controlled echocardiographic study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;78:F166–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pelech AN. Evaluation of the pediatric patient with a cardiac murmur. Pediatr Clin N Am. 1999;46:167–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Frank JE, Jacobe KM. Evaluation and management of heart murmurs in children. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84:793–800.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lang SM, Bolin E, Hardy S, Tang X, Collins RT 2nd. Diagnostic yield of outpatient pediatric echocardiograms: impact of indications and specialty. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38:162–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Singh Y. Echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamics in neonates and children. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:201.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Chamsi-Pasha MA, Sengupta PP, Zoghbi WA. Handheld echocardiography: current state and future perspectives. Circulation. 2017;136:2178–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Singh Y, Katheria A, Tissot C. Functional echocardiography in the neonatal intensive care unit. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55:417–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Simpson JM, van den Bosch A. Educational series in congenital heart disease: three-dimensional echocardiography in congenital heart disease. Echo Res Pract. 2019;6:R75–86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jenkins KJ, Botto LD, Correa A, Foster E, Kupiec JK, Marino BS, et al. Public health approach to improve outcomes for congenital heart disease across the life span. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e009450.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Giorgione V, Parazzini F, Fesslova V, Cipriani S, Candiani M, Inversetti A, et al. Congenital heart defects in IVF/ICSI pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:33–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Karatza AA, Fouzas S, Tzifas S, Mermiga A, Dimitriou G, Mantagos S. Accuracy of cardiac auscultation in asymptomatic neonates with heart murmurs: comparison between pediatric trainees and neonatologists. Pediatr Cardiol. 2011;32:473–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Medical Research Information Center (MedRIC) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), which is funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of the Korean Government (NRF No. 2018R1A6A6040880).

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SAY conceptualized and designed the study, performed the initial analyses, and drafted the initial manuscript. WHH conceptualized and designed the study and reviewed and revised the manuscript. SYA and HJC collected data and reviewed and revised the manuscript. SAY and WHH coordinated and supervised data collection and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woi Hyun Hong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Detailed search strategy and returned number of articles.

Additional file 2.

Excluded studies with reasons for exclusion.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, S.A., Hong, W.H. & Cho, H.J. Congenital heart disease diagnosed with echocardiogram in newborns with asymptomatic cardiac murmurs: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 20, 322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02212-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cardiac assessment
  • Asymptomatic non-syndromic cardiac murmurs
  • Echocardiogram
  • Newborns
  • Congenital heart disease