Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of tight glycemic control and hypoglycemia after pediatric cardiac surgery on neurodevelopmental outcomes at three years of age: Findings from a randomized clinical trial

BMC Pediatrics volume 22, Article number: 531 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Studies examining the impact of randomization As per standard instruction, city is required for affiliations; however, this information is missing in affiliation 6. Please check if the provided city is correct and amend if necessary. to tight glycemic control (TGC) and resultant hypoglycemia on later neurodevelopmental outcomes have produced mixed results. Our study examined this association in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods

Participants who were enrolled in the Safe Pediatric Euglycemia after Cardiac Surgery (SPECS) trial returned for neurodevelopmental (ND) follow-up between 30 to 42.5 months of age. ND outcomes were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. ND scores were compared between the TGC and standard care treatment groups and between patients with moderate to severe and no to mild hypoglycemia. As a secondary analysis, to increase sample size and power, we combined the three-year-old assessments with previously collected assessments done at < 30 months of age to further examine differences between groups longitudinally.

Results

Among the 269 participants who completed neurodevelopmental evaluation (in-person testing or questionnaires) at three years of age (follow-up rate, 31%), there were no statistically significant differences in ND outcomes according to treatment group or hypoglycemia status. In the combined analysis of all evaluations (from 9 to 42.5 months of age), we found no treatment group differences. However, in these longitudinal analyses, children who experienced moderate to severe hypoglycemia had lower scores on the Bayley-III cognitive and motor domains compared to children with no to mild hypoglycemia.

Conclusions

For infants undergoing cardiac surgery, there was no impact of tight glycemic control on neurodevelopmental outcomes. Moderate to severe hypoglycemia was associated with worse ND outcomes in longitudinal analyses.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00443599. Registered: November 2016.

Peer Review reports

Background

The immediate and short-term effects of using tight glycemic control (TGC) in critically ill pediatric patients have been investigated through multiple studies. Several meta-analyses have concluded that TGC was not associated with reduction of mortality or infections but instead was associated with an increased incidence of hypoglycemia [1,2,3,4,5].

Limited studies have examined the impact of randomization to TGC and resultant hypoglycemia on later neurodevelopmental outcomes, and results have been mixed. Biagas et al. (2020) found no differences in adaptive functioning at one-year after pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) discharge between patients randomized to lower vs. higher target glycemic control [6]. Results of a four-year follow-up for the Leuven randomized trial of TGC vs. standard care in critically ill patients ages 1–16 years admitted to the pediatric ICU noted improved motor coordination and cognitive flexibility in the TGC group [7]. Brief episodes of hypoglycemia were not associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcome; however, only intermittent blood glucose checking was employed [8]. On the other hand, results of our one-year-old neurodevelopmental (ND) follow-up from the Safe Pediatric Euglycemia after Cardiac Surgery (SPECS) trial, which used continuous glucose monitoring to track glycemia in children with congenital heart disease aged three years or younger undergoing cardiac surgery, found that children who experienced moderate to severe hypoglycemia (n = 8) had lower scores on the cognitive, language, and motor domains of development of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition compared to patients with no to mild hypoglycemia, even after controlling for factors known to be associated with poorer ND outcomes [9].

Building upon our previous work, here we report on the ND follow-up of SPECS trial participants conducted at three years of age. The objective of this paper is to examine the association between randomization to TGC after pediatric cardiac surgery with ND outcomes at three years of age, a secondary outcome of the trial. In addition, we assess the relationship between hypoglycemia status and ND outcomes. Serial ND follow-up of this cohort is critical to assess whether the impact of hypoglycemia found at one year follow-up is also seen at three years of age. In addition, to increase sample size and power, we combine the ND follow-up data across all ages (9 to 42.5 months) to examine the impact of randomization to TGC and hypoglycemia status on neurodevelopmental outcomes after controlling for other patient and medical factors known to be associated with poorer ND outcomes.

Methods

Participants

In this two-center (Boston Children’s Hospital and the University of Michigan C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital) prospective randomized clinical trial [10, 11] (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00443599), 980 children aged 0–36 months undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were randomly assigned either to the TGC group, where normoglycemia (i.e., glucose level between 80 to 110 mg/dL) was maintained using an insulin dosing algorithm, or to the standard of care (STD) group, which did not employ a blood glucose target. Patients were randomized according to a permuted-block design with stratification according to center. Continuous glucose monitoring was performed in all patients, which alerted for impending or actual hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia episodes were determined based on glucometer and/or laboratory blood glucose values and were categorized as mild (50–59 mg/dL [2.8–3.3 mmol/L]), moderate (40–49 mg/dL [2.2–2.7 mmol/L]), or severe (< 40 mg/dL [< 2.2 mmol/L]). The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards of the two centers. The primary outcome of the SPECS trial was the rate of health care-associated infections in the cardiac ICU. Neurodevelopment follow-up at one and three years of age were added as secondary outcomes to the study protocol in December 2008 after 159 patients had been enrolled in the study. The study was not powered on these secondary outcomes. Enrollment in the SPECS trial began in September 2006 and ended in May 2012; follow-up was conducted from March 2009 to August 2015. A detailed description of the study design, results of the primary outcome analysis, and results of the one-year-old ND follow-up have been published previously [9,10,11,12].

Neurodevelopmental Follow-up at Three Years of Age

Participants were invited for three-year-old ND follow-up if they were between 30 to 42.5 months of age at the time of follow-up and lived in the United States. Two experienced pediatric psychologists (A.S. and J.B.) blinded to treatment group assignment and hypoglycemia status conducted the in-person assessments. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III) [13], a gold standard measure used to assess toddler development up to 42 months 15 days of age, was administered. Parents also completed the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Second Edition (ABAS-II) [14], a standardized caregiver-reported questionnaire to assess adaptive functioning, and the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition (BASC-2) [15], a standardized caregiver-reported questionnaire to assess behavior and socio-emotional functioning of children. Standard composite scores (mean ± standard deviation, 100 ± 15) and subscale scores (10 ± 3) are reported for the Bayley-III and ABAS-II while T-scores of the four composite domains (50 ± 10) are reported for the BASC-2. In addition, parents completed the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ-3) [16], a developmental screener that uses pre-established score thresholds to evaluate risk of developmental delay in several domains of functioning. The percentage of patients ‘at-risk’ based on ASQ-3 thresholds are reported. Parents were mailed the ASQ-3 if the family agreed to participate in the study but was unable to come to the clinic for an in-person visit.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were calculated, including mean values and standard deviations for continuous variables and frequency counts and percentages for categorical variables. Comparisons by treatment group and hypoglycemia status were made using linear regression or stratified Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables or stratified exact tests for categorical variables, with adjustment for site a priori. Moderate and severe hypoglycemia were combined in these analyses, given the low number of patients who had severe hypoglycemia. Analyses exploring the association of moderate to severe hypoglycemia with ND outcomes excluded patients with genetic anomalies that have established patterns of associated developmental disabilities [17, 18].

As a secondary analysis, to increase sample size and power, we combined all ND assessments across all ages (9–42.5 months), including multiple assessments per patient, using longitudinal multivariable linear regression analysis with adjustment for site. We used regression analysis to evaluate the association of moderate to severe hypoglycemia with ND outcomes after controlling stepwise for other factors known to be associated with poorer ND outcomes [19]. These factors included age at surgery of 60 days or younger [12], Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) category of ≥ 3 (or not assignable) [19], single ventricle physiology, premature birth, maternal education (high school diploma or lower vs associate’s degree or higher), prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (≥ 150 min), deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, delayed sternal closure, treatment group (TGC or STD), and cardiac ICU duration of stay tertile (< 2, 2–4.99, or ≥ 5 days), as well as age at ND testing. As an exploratory analysis, we also examined the interaction of moderate to severe hypoglycemia with age at testing in our longitudinal regression analyses. We used generalized estimating equations in final regression analyses to account for correlation between repeated measures from individuals. Analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Results

Of the 872 participants eligible for ND follow-up at three years of age, 269 participants (124 TGC, 145 STD) completed any ND follow-up (either in-person testing or parent-completed questionnaires) between 30 to 42.5 months of age (Fig. 1), at a median of 32 months after cardiac surgery (interquartile range, 28–36). There was a significant difference in participation rate by site (Boston 22% vs Michigan 47%; p < 0.001). Patients who returned for ND follow-up were more likely to be ≤ 60 days of age at the time of surgery (p = 0.008) and have single ventricle physiology (p = 0.01) than those who did not return (Table 1). For all other prerandomization, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics, the two groups were comparable.

fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of patients enrolled in the SPECS trial.

ND Neurodevelopmental, SPECS Safe pediatric euglycemia after cardiac surgery, STD Standard care, TGC Tight glycemic control. 872 patients were eligible for 3-year-old follow-up, 269 had any follow-up between 30–42.5 months of age, and 214 had in-person testing. a 221 patients (97 TGC, 124 STD) without genetic anomaly. b 169 patients (72 TGC, 97 STD) without genetic anomaly

Full size image
Table 1 Patient Characteristics According to Three-Year-Old Neurodevelopmental Follow-up Status
Full size table

Among the 269 participants with three-year-old ND follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in prerandomization or intraoperative characteristics (Table 2). Postoperatively, participants in the TGC group were more likely to be treated with insulin therapy (p < 0.001) and had lower time-weighted blood glucose averages (p < 0.001) than participants in the STD group. Moderate to severe hypoglycemia was experienced by 8 patients in the TGC group and 5 patients in the STD group (p = 0.39).

Table 2 Characteristics of Patients with Three-Year-Old Neurodevelopmental Follow-up According to Treatment Group
Full size table

In-person ND testing was conducted on 96 participants in the TGC group and 118 participants in the STD group while for 55 patients, parents completed only questionnaires (28 TGC, 27 STD, p = 0.54). There were no statistically significant differences between the TGC and STD groups on the different domains of developmental functioning using the Bayley-III, adaptive functioning using the ABAS-II, or measures of behavioral and socio-emotional functioning using the BASC-2 (Table 3). The treatment groups were also comparable in terms of percentage at-risk for concerns across the different domains on the ASQ-3 (Table 3) and in the percentage of patients who received early intervention services (TGC 65% vs STD 60%; p = 0.37).

Table 3 Three-Year-Old Neurodevelopmental Outcomes According to Treatment Group
Full size table

After excluding 45 children with a genetic anomaly who returned for in-person testing, we found that more patients who experienced moderate to severe hypoglycemia (4 TGC, 2 STD) had surgery within the first 60 days of life (p = 0.03), had complex heart disease (p = 0.03), and had a cardiac ICU duration ≥ 5 days (p = 0.003; Table 4) than patients who did not experience hypoglycemia. Four of those patients (2 TGC, 2 STD) had one hypoglycemia episode while two patients (2 TGC) had two episodes.

Table 4 Patient Characteristics and Three-Year-Old Neurodevelopmental Outcomes for Patients Without a Genetic Anomaly According to Hypoglycemia Status
Full size table

In terms of ND testing at three years of age, participants with moderate to severe hypoglycemia had lower scores on the gross motor domain of the Bayley-III than children with no to mild hypoglycemia; however, these results did not reach statistical significance (6.8 ± 4.2 vs 8.8 ± 2.5; p = 0.07).

We also performed a longitudinal analysis which included all assessments for study patients without a genetic anomaly who returned for any ND follow-up from 9 to 42.5 months of age to examine treatment group differences and to assess the impact of hypoglycemia on ND outcomes over time. A total of 250 patients without a genetic anomaly returned at any time point, of whom 148 had one assessment, 101 had two assessments, and one patient had three assessments. Of these 250 patients, 10 patients had moderate to severe hypoglycemia (8 TGC, 2 STD), including 2 patients with single ventricle physiology and 4 patients who had two assessments each. Adjusting for site, there were no differences in Bayley-III composite or subscale scores by treatment group when analyzing the data combined across all ages (data not shown); however, children with moderate to severe hypoglycemia scored 6.4 points lower on the Bayley-III cognitive composite (p = 0.04), 8.5 points lower on the language composite (p = 0.08), and 11.0 points lower on the motor composite (p = 0.04). After controlling for other risk factors associated with worse outcomes, children who experienced moderate to severe hypoglycemia continued to have lower scores on the Bayley-III cognitive (6.7 points; p = 0.04) and motor composite (11.2 points; p = 0.04) compared with children with no to mild hypoglycemia (Table 5). In addition to hypoglycemia status, older age at testing was associated with lower cognitive scores but higher language and motor scores. Lower maternal education and cardiac ICU duration ≥ 5 days were associated with lower language scores, while single ventricle physiology was associated with lower motor scores. We explored for interactions between moderate to severe hypoglycemia and age at testing; the interaction term was significant (p = 0.01) when added to the multivariable model for language score only (data not shown). The effect of moderate to severe hypoglycemia on language score was greater at 12 months of age (–9.5 points, 95% CI –20.6 to 1.6) than at 36 months of age (0.2 points, 95% CI –9.4 to 9.9).

Table 5 Longitudinal Multivariable Regression to Evaluate the Impact of Hypoglycemia Status and Other Factors on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes (9 to 42.5 Months) in Patients Without a Genetic Anomaly (n = 353 assessments of 250 patients)
Full size table

Discussion

In this two-center randomized clinical trial examining the impact of randomization to TGC and resultant hypoglycemia on the neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants and young children undergoing congenital heart surgery, we found that, consistent with our one-year-old ND follow-up findings [9], randomization to TGC was not associated with worse ND outcomes at three years of age. There were no differences between the TGC and STD groups on any standardized measures of developmental, adaptive, behavioral, or socio-emotional functioning. The results of our study are in contrast to the results obtained in Leuven’s randomized trial of TGC vs. standard care in which children in the TGC group had improved neurodevelopmental outcomes [7]. There were also no statistically significant differences by hypoglycemia status at three years of age, though our analyses were likely underpowered given the small sample size. In addition, in our secondary analysis, after combining ND follow-up from the SPECS study across all ages and controlling for other risk factors known to be associated with worse ND outcomes in children with congenital heart disease, we found that children who experienced moderate to severe hypoglycemia had lower scores on the cognitive and motor domains compared to children with no to mild hypoglycemia.

Our findings on the association of hypoglycemia with worse ND outcomes persisted in the cognitive and motor domains despite the number of patients with moderate to severe hypoglycemia in our study cohort being small. This is consistent with the growing body of research that has documented the impact of hypoglycemia on the developing brain [20,21,22,23]. Children with hypoglycemia are known to have white matter and cortical abnormalities which impact development [20]. The effects of hypoglycemia on neurodevelopment emerge in the early childhood period impacting the visual-motor domain and executive functioning [21] and persist through mid-childhood impacting literacy and learning [22, 23]. It is also possible that hypoglycemia continues to have long-term effects in the cognitive and motor domains and impacts higher-level skills that do not emerge until later phases of development, and hence serial follow-up into adolescence is recommended [24].

Our study has important implications for critical care management. Hypoglycemia is a potentially modifiable factor impacting neurodevelopment. The results of our study add to the literature by highlighting the ongoing need for close glucose monitoring during critical illness to avoid prolonged hypoglycemia. In addition, ongoing long-term ND monitoring to assess the functional impact of hypoglycemia is critical given the limited predictive value of ND testing for later development [24].

Our study is limited by the significant attrition rate and the small number of patients without a genetic anomaly experiencing moderate or severe hypoglycemia who were brought for ND follow-up at any age (10 patients). There also may be a potential selection bias in those who returned based on geographic location of the families and on the severity of medical (e.g., more likely to have single ventricle physiology) and developmental impairment in the children which may affect the generalizability of the study. In addition, the results of our study are confined to children who have undergone cardiac operation and may not be generalizable to other populations with complex medical needs. Hypoglycemia episodes were determined based on glucometer and/or laboratory blood glucose values. Since those values were intermittent, it was not possible to definitively measure duration of hypoglycemia. We also did not collect data on timing and duration of early intervention services to assess its potential effect on ND outcomes. In addition, the ASQ is a developmental screening tool completed by parents and is not as comprehensive as an in-person evaluation conducted by a clinician. Finally, while we adjusted for several factors known to be associated with ND outcomes, our exploratory multivariable linear regression models explained a low proportion of the variation in ND scores and may not have included other important events (e.g., cardiac arrest) that possibly modify the association between hypoglycemia and outcome. Our findings should be viewed as preliminary and be interpreted with caution given the small number of patients who experienced moderate to severe hypoglycemia. Future research should explore the potential association of hypoglycemia with long-term ND outcomes with a larger sample.

Conclusions

Our study shows that, for infants undergoing cardiac surgery, randomization to tight glycemic control did not impact ND outcomes at three years of age. Resultant hypoglycemia status was also not associated with neurodevelopment, though our analyses were likely underpowered. However, when combining ND outcomes across the first three years of life, we found that moderate to severe hypoglycemia was associated with worse cognitive and motor outcomes, even after controlling for patient and medical factors known to be associated with worse ND outcomes. This study provides an understanding of neurodevelopmental sequelae beyond the infancy period and advocates for long-term ND monitoring to better understand the impact of randomization to TGC and resultant hypoglycemia over time.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding/senior author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TGC:

Tight glycemic control

ICU:

Intensive care unit

ND:

Neurodevelopmental

SPECS:

Safe pediatric euglycemia after cardiac surgery

STD:

Standard care

Bayley-III:

Bayley scales of infant and toddler development, third edition

ABAS-II:

Adaptive behavior assessment system, second edition

BASC-2:

Behavior assessment system for children, second edition

ASQ-3:

Ages and stages questionnaire, third edition

RACHS-1:

Risk adjustment in congenital heart surgery (RACHS-1)

References

  1. Zhao Y, Wu Y, Xiang B. Tight glycemic control in critically ill pediatric patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pediatr Res. 2018;84(1):22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamada T, Shojima N, Hara K, Noma H, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T. Glycemic control, mortality, secondary infection, and hypoglycemia in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(9):1427–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Faustino EVS, Hirshberg EL, Asaro LA, Biagas KV, Pinto N, Srinivasan V, et al. Short-term adverse outcomes associated with hypoglycemia in critically ill children. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(5):706–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen L, Li T, Fang F, Zhang Y, Faramand A. Tight glycemic control in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Soto-Rivera CL, Agus MSD. Tight glycemic control in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2016;5(4):198–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Biagas KV, Hinton VJ, Hasbani NR, Luckett PM, Wypij D, Nadkarni VM, Agus MSD. HALF-PINT trial study investigators; PALISI Network. Long-term neurobehavioral and quality of life outcomes of critically Ill children after glycemic control. J Pediatr. 2020;218(57):63-e5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mesotten D, Gielen M, Sterken C, Claessens K, Hermans G, Vlasselaers D, et al. Neurocognitive development of children 4 years after critical illness and treatment with tight glucose control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;308(16):1641–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vlasselaers D, Milants I, Desmet L, Wouters PJ, Vanhorebeek I, van den Heuvel I, et al. Intensive insulin therapy for patients in paediatric intensive care: a prospective, randomised controlled study. Lancet. 2009;373(9663):547–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadhwani A, Asaro LA, Goldberg C, Ware J, Butcher J, Gaies M, et al. Impact of tight glycemic control on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 1 year of age for children with congenital heart disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2016;174:193-8.e2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Agus MS, Steil GM, Wypij D, Costello JM, Laussen PC, Langer M, et al. Tight glycemic control versus standard care after pediatric cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1208–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaies MG, Langer M, Alexander J, Steil GM, Ware J, Wypij D, et al. Design and rationale of safe pediatric euglycemia after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial of tight glycemic control after pediatric cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(2):148–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Agus MS, Asaro LA, Steil GM, Alexander JL, Silverman M, Wypij D, et al. Tight glycemic control after pediatric cardiac surgery in high-risk patient populations: a secondary analysis of the safe pediatric euglycemia after cardiac surgery trial. Circulation. 2014;129(22):2297–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Pearson education; 2006.

  14. Harrison PL, Oakland T, Angeles CA. Adaptive behavior assessment system. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX, Pearson education; 2003.

  15. Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW. Behavior assessment system for children. 2nd ed. Circle Pines, MN: Am Guid Serv; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Squires J, Bricker D. Ages and stages questionnaires. A parent completed child-monitoring system. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Paul Brookes publishing; 2009.

  17. Gaynor JW, Wernovsky G, Jarvik GP, Bernbaum J, Gerdes M, Zackai E, et al. Patient characteristics are important determinants of neurodevelopmental outcome at one year of age after neonatal and infant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(5):1344–53 53 e1 3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeltser I, Jarvik GP, Bernbaum J, Wernovsky G, Nord AS, Gerdes M, et al. Genetic factors are important determinants of neurodevelopmental outcome after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(1):91–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Newburger JW, Spray TL, Moller JH, Iezzoni LI. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123(1):110–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Burns CM, Rutherford MA, Boardman JP, Cowan FM. Patterns of cerebral injury and neurodevelopmental outcomes after symptomatic neonatal hypoglycemia. Pediatr. 2008;122(1):65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McKinlay CJD, Alsweiler JM, Anstice NS, Burakevych N, Chakraborty A, Chase JG, et al. Association of neonatal glycemia with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 4.5 years. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(10):972–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaiser JR, Bai S, Gibson N, Holland G, Lin TM, Swearingen CJ, et al. Association between transient newborn hypoglycemia and fourth-grade achievement test proficiency: a population-based study. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(10):913–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shah R, Harding J, Brown J, McKinlay C. Neonatal glycaemia and neurodevelopmental outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2019;115(2):116–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McGrath E, Wypij D, Rappaport LA, Newburger JW, Bellinger DC. Prediction of IQ and achievement at age 8 years from neurodevelopmental status at age 1 year in children with D-transposition of the great arteries. Pediatr. 2004;114(5):e572–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (R01 HL088448 [to M.A.]), the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Supplement (R01 HL088448-02S1 [to M.A.]), and the Harvard Catalyst Clinical and Translational Research Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences UL1 RR05758).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Anjali Sadhwani

  2. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Lisa A. Asaro & David Wypij

  3. Division of Cardiology, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Caren S. Goldberg, Michael Gaies & Cynthia Smith

  4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Caren S. Goldberg, Jennifer Butcher & Michael Gaies

  5. Department of Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    Janice Ware

  6. Division of Pediatric Psychology, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital and University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Jennifer Butcher

  7. Division of Medical Critical Care, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Jamin L. Alexander & Michael S. D. Agus

  8. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    David Wypij

Authors
  1. Anjali Sadhwani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa A. Asaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caren S. Goldberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Janice Ware
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jennifer Butcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael Gaies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cynthia Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jamin L. Alexander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. David Wypij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michael S. D. Agus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AS, CG, JW, JB, MG, DW, and MA made substantial contribution to the study’s design. AS and JB conducted the ND testing. CS and JA collaborated in the coordination of data acquisition and entry. LA and DW performed statistical analyses. All authors contributed to refinement of the study protocol, assisted in the interpretation of the results, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjali Sadhwani.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committees of the Institutional Review Boards of Boston Children’s Hospital and C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. A written informed consent was obtained from all parents/guardians before their participation in the study including neurodevelopmental follow-up.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadhwani, A., Asaro, L.A., Goldberg, C.S. et al. Impact of tight glycemic control and hypoglycemia after pediatric cardiac surgery on neurodevelopmental outcomes at three years of age: Findings from a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pediatr 22, 531 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03556-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03556-z

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us