Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical manifestations and anti-TNF alpha therapy of juvenile Behçet’s disease in Taiwan

BMC Pediatrics volume 19, Article number: 232 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Backgrounds

Behçet’s disease (BD) is a rare vasculitic disorder affecting all sizes of vessels. Among BD patients, 4 to 25% of patients with diagnosed age younger than 16 years old are defined as juvenile BD (JBD). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical manifestations and treatments of patients with JBD, with a particular focus on the effectiveness and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients diagnosed with JBD at age of 16 years or younger in a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. The clinical manifestations, laboratory data, treatments, disease courses, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. The effectiveness of anti-TNF-alpha therapy was measured based on changes in Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) scores, prednisolone dosages and the immunosuppression load scores.

Results

Fifty-five patients were included in the study. The median age at disease onset was 11 years. The most common clinical presentation was recurrent oral aphthous ulcers (100%), followed by genital ulceration (69.1%), skin lesions (36.4%), gastrointestinal symptoms (29.1%), ocular involvement (27.3%), and arthralgia (27.3%). Ninety-one percent of the patients fulfilled the International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease, and 36.4% met the Paediatric Behçet’s Disease criteria. The most frequently used medications were prednisolone (74.5%) and colchicine (54.5%). Six patients with refractory or severe JBD received anti-TNF-alpha therapy. These patients were diagnosed at a younger age compared with those who did not receive anti-TNF-alpha therapy (7.5 vs 13 years; P = 0.012), the BDCAF scores reduced significantly at the 1st month, the 6th month and 1 year after the treatment. They did not use steroids after the first year of treatment, and, after treatment for 6 months, their immunosuppression load scores reduced significantly. Due to the limited case numbers, literature reviews of anti-TNF-alpha therapy for refractory JBD were conducted, which had a total 18 JBD patients receiving anti-TNF-alpha therapy, of which fifteen patients had favorable outcomes after treatment with minimal side effects.

Conclusions

Anti-TNF-alpha therapy may be necessary for JBD patients with refractory disease courses. Anti-TNF-alpha therapy was effective and safe in these patients, especially regarding its corticosteroid- and immunosuppressive drug-sparing effects.

Peer Review reports

Background

Behçet’s disease (BD) is a recurrent, multisystem, inflammatory disorder that affects vessels of all sizes. Its variety of clinical manifestations include recurrent oral and genital aphthous ulcers, skin lesions, arthritis, uveitis, thrombophlebitis, and gastrointestinal and central nervous system involvements [1, 2]. Juvenile BD (JBD) or pediatric BD refers to those patients who was diagnosed with Behçet’s disease at or before the age of 16 [3], and it accounts for 4–25% of all patients with BD [4]. The BD incidence varies according to geographical location, with the highest prevalence in Turkey (420 per 100,000 people), followed by Iran, northern China, and Korea [2]. The estimated BD incidence in Taiwan was 0.9 per 100,000 person-years from 2005 to 2009 [5]. Although the age of peak onset is between the third and fourth decades of life, awareness about the presence of BD during childhood has increased gradually [3, 6, 7]. Given its rarity and variety of clinical presentations, diagnosing JBD is challenging and often delayed.

The pathogenesis of BD remains unclear. While BD is largely considered a type-1 T helper (Th1) and type-17 T helper (Th17)-mediated inflammatory disease, characterized by elevated Th1 and Th17 cytokine levels [2, 8,9,10], recent evidence suggests that the autoinflammatory nature of BD plays a role in its pathogenesis [11]. Given the complex mechanisms underlying BD, therapy depends largely on the affected site and disease severity. While the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) established treatment recommendations for the management of adult BD, no controlled studies have evaluated the treatment of JBD [8]. Immunosuppressive therapy has improved patients’ outcomes, but some BD patients have refractory disease courses. Anti-TNF-alpha therapy is useful for patients with refractory, severe BD, and especially for those with ocular [10, 12], central nervous system [10], and gastrointestinal [9, 10, 13] involvements. The use of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in children has been described in the context of small patient series or case reports only [14,15,16]. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics of patients with JBD and their treatments, with a particular focus on the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-alpha therapy.

Methods

Study design and enrollment criteria

We retrospectively reviewed patients with diagnosis of BD at age of 16 years or younger at the National Taiwan University Hospital who were diagnosed between 2008 and 2017, and whose diagnostic codes were ICD-9-CM 136.1 or ICD-10-CM M35.2. The patients’ data were derived from their medical records and interviews with the patients and their caregivers. The records contained data describing the patients’ clinical presentations, physical examinations, laboratory data at diagnosis, endoscopic and pathological findings, and medications administered. Patients were recruited if they fulfilled the International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease (ICBD) or the Pediatric Behçet’s Disease (PEDBD) criteria [4]. If patients did not satisfy these criteria, but they had oral or genital aphthous ulcers and some symptoms and signs associated with BD, including arthritis/arthralgia, abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, or pathological findings, and they did not have a concurrent infection that might contribute to BD-like symptoms, we included them in this study as patients with possible JBD. Those patients who were older than 16 years old at the time of diagnosis or who eventually had another alternative diagnosis, such as inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus or identified infectious disease with transient BD-like symptoms, were excluded from this study.

The patients were divided into two groups according to the use of anti-TNF-alpha therapy, and the clinical presentations, laboratory data, and other treatment regimens were compared. The therapeutic outcomes of the JBD patients who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy were evaluated at baseline, and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and > 1 year, if available. The treatment outcomes were evaluated in relation to symptom improvements, inflammatory marker changes, corticosteroid sparing, and the immunosuppression load scores. The Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) scores were also collected to evaluate the change of disease severity. The BDCAF total score was calculated out of 12 and then given as a transformed index score on an interval scale out of 20 [17]. The degree of immunosuppression was graded using a semiquantitative scale proposed by Nussenblatt et al [18] and applied to evaluations of anti-TNF therapy by Calvo-Río et al. [12] This grading scheme provides a combined, single numerical score for the total immunosuppression load per unit of body weight per day. Grades for prednisone, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and methotrexate ranged from 0 to 9, and those for mycophenolate mofetil ranged from 0 to 7. For patients administered multiple medications, the sum of the grading score for each drug was used to calculate the total immunosuppression score at baseline, and at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the anti-TNF-alpha therapy was initiated.

Statistical analyses

All variables were tested for normality with either Kolmogorov–Smirnov test or Shapiro-Wilk test. Patient data were expressed as counts, percentages or medians with range for quantitative and ordinal data. The statistical analyses were performed using IBM®SPSS® software, version 23.0 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the categorical variables. Differences between the continuous variables were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney-U test for independent samples or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired related samples. All of the tests were two-sided, and a value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients’ characteristics and treatments

Fifty-five patients with JBD were investigated, comprising 22 boys and 33 girls. The median age at the initial onset of symptoms was 11.0 (range 0.1–16.0) years, and the median age at diagnosis was 13.0 (range 0.1–16.0) years. Fifty (90.9%) and 20 (36.4%) patients fulfilled the ICBD and PEDBD criteria, respectively. Five patients had possible JBD. The most common clinical presentation was recurrent oral aphthous ulcers (100%), followed by genital ulceration (69.1%), skin lesions (36.4%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (29.1%) (Table 1). Pathergy test was not routinely performed in our cases. Only 5 patients had records of pathergy test and two of them had positive findings.

Table 1 Characteristics of the patients with juvenile Behçet’s disease (n = 55)
Full size table

The median white blood cell count was 8.8 (range 3.8–18.6) × 103 cells/μL, and 27% of the patients had leukocytosis > 11.0 × 103cells/μL. The median hemoglobin level was 13.0 (range 10.0–14.7) g/L, and 22.7% of the patients had anemia relative to their ages. The median erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 21.0 (range 2.0–90.0) mm/h, and 51.5% of the patients had ESRs > 20 mm/h. The median C-reactive protein (CRP) level was 0.6 (range 0–20) mg/dL, and 45.5% of the patients had elevated CRP levels. Antinuclear antibodies were detected in 20.5% of the patients, but no other autoantibodies were detected. Thirteen patients received an examination of HLA typing and only one patient had positive HLA-B51.

The patients most frequently received oral prednisolone (74.5%), followed by colchicine (54.5%) and mesalazine/sulfasalazine (34.5%). Oral prednisolone and colchicine were mostly frequently prescribed as first-line systemic therapy. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were prescribed to 30.9% of the patients and always in combination with other medications. Azathioprine was the most commonly used immunosuppressive drug (30.9%) and the only immunosuppressant used as first-line treatment. Six patients received anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Two patients who presented with uveitis were treated with adalimumab mainly, and the other patients were treated with etanercept (Table 2). After treatment, most of the patients’ symptoms improved, and the initially high CRP levels and ESRs gradually returned to their normal ranges within 6 months. Fifteen patients required long-term follow-up assessments, and, of these, six patients received anti-TNF-alpha therapy and nine patients received colchicine or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and, sometimes, prednisolone to manage disease flares.

Table 2 Systemic treatments in patients with juvenile Behçet’s disease
Full size table

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy for patients with juvenile Behçet’s disease

The six patients who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy were followed continuously for durations that ranged from 1 year to 3 years. Compared with the patients who did not receive anti-TNF-alpha therapy (Table 3), the median ages of those who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy were lower at disease onset (12 vs 7.0 years; P = 0.029) and diagnosis (13.0 vs 7.5 years; P = 0.012). Compared with the patients who did not receive anti-TNF-alpha therapy, gastrointestinal symptoms (22.4 vs 66.7%; P = 0.041) and arthritis/arthralgia (24.5 vs 66.7%; P = 0.053) were more frequent in the patients who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy. The groups did not differ regarding other aspects of the clinical presentation of BD. Compared with the patients who did not receive anti-TNF-alpha therapy, those who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy had higher median serum CRP levels at diagnosis (0.4 vs 6.0 mg/dL; P = 0.025), and they tended to present with lower median hemoglobin levels at disease onset (13.1 vs 11.5 g/L; P = 0.06).

Table 3 Comparison of the characteristics of the patients with juvenile Behçet’s disease who were and were not treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy
Full size table

We analyzed medications other than anti-TNF-alpha therapy in the two groups of JBD patients. All six patients who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy were treated with long-term oral prednisolone. In the group that did not receive anti-TNF-alpha therapy, 71.4% patients had taken oral prednisolone, and 60% of them had undergone long-term courses of steroid treatment over 14 days. More patients who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy were prescribed immunosuppressants (30.6 vs 100%; P = 0.002) and a greater variety of anti-rheumatic medications than those who did not receive anti-TNF-alpha therapy.

Table 4 summarizes the characteristics of the six JBD patients who received anti-TNF-alpha. Four patients were diagnosed at < 10 years of age, and two patients had experienced symptoms since infancy. All of the patients had received steroids for ≥6 months before the administration of anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Two patients had short statures, and this was considered to be related to chronic disease and long-term steroid use. After starting the anti-TNF-alpha therapy, all six patients’ steroid doses gradually declined over 1 year, and, compared with the baseline dosage, the difference was significant (Fig. 1a). The corticosteroid-sparing effects and reductions in the immunosuppression load scores were observed at 6 months after treatment (Fig. 1a and b). Except for patient #5, all of the patients’ symptoms improved, and their immunosuppressants were discontinued within 1 year. The patients who had high serum CRP levels or ESRs before treatment showed declines in their inflammatory marker levels several months after the anti-TNF-alpha therapy was initiated. Moreover, the serial change of BDCAF scores were depicted in Fig. 1c, which showed significantly reduction at the 1st month, the 6th month and 1 year after the treatment (P = 0.042 at 1st month, P = 0.027 at the 6th month, and P = 0.026 at 1 year).

Table 4 Clinical characteristics of juvenile Behçet’s disease patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy and response of the treatment
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy in patients with juvenile Behçet’s disease on (a) corticosteroid sparing, (b) the immunosuppression load score and (c) serial change of Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form transformed index scores. (TNF: tumor necrosis factor; BDCAF: Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form)

Full size image

After receiving adalimumab, the active uveitis and visual acuity of patient #5 improved; however, relapsing oral ulcers, and high CRP levels and ESRs persisted. We discontinued adalimumab and began tocilizumab treatment 1.4 years after the anti-TNF-alpha therapy was initiated, and the patient’s symptoms subsided. When we tried to reduce the anti-TNF-alpha therapy, disease flares occurred in two patients during the second year of therapy. Severe infectious episodes did not occur, and all six patients tolerated the anti-TNF-alpha therapy without experiencing any particular discomfort during treatment.

Discussion

In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed patients who were diagnosed with JBD and their treatment. We especially reported the favorable response and safety of using anti-TNF alpha in those patients with refractory symptoms after conventional treatments. Not only the disease severity scores were significantly reduced, but also the dosage of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive drugs were markedly reduced.

The variety of and lack of exact biomarkers for BD has led to the development of several sets of diagnostic criteria for BD. The International Behçet’s Study Group criteria are the most widely used diagnostic criteria for BD, but their sensitivity is suboptimal, especially for JBD [19,20,21]. Other BD classification criteria have been developed for more robust diagnoses. The ICBD have been validated in JBD patients with sensitivities that range from 70 to 80%, but specificity data are absent [22, 23]. The PEDBD criteria were developed for children, and they have a sensitivity of 73.5% and a specificity of 97.7% [4, 21]. To replicate an actual population of JBD patients, we enrolled JBD patients based on the ICBD, because of their high level of sensitivity for these patients. We also applied the PEDBD criteria to these patients, because they are specific to JBD. In addition to the 50 patients who met either the ICBD or PEDBD criteria, five patients were identified as possible JBD in this study. All of these patients had recurrent oral aphthous ulcers, and they were diagnosed based on their associated symptoms or pathological evidence. They received colchicine or prednisolone, and the symptoms improved in four of these patients. The remaining patient who presented with fever, recurrent oral ulcers, and severe enteritis, experienced persistent symptoms while receiving conventional treatment, and she was eventually administered anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Our study identified pediatric patients who did not fulfill any of the clinical BD criteria, but required therapy like patients with confirmed JBD.

The median age at disease onset and time of diagnosis were 11 and 13 years old respectively in our JBD patients. The mean onset age of JBD reported from other studies [4, 22, 23] ranged from 4.87 to 7.4 years old, which was younger than that of our patients. The reported age at JBD diagnosis was similar amongst those studies (11.29–13.87 years old) and our data. The differences may be explained by the recall bias but it may also be an indication that our physicians were not as alarming as those in other studies in recognizing BD symptoms which appeared in early childhood. There were patients who were diagnosed as BD at an extremely young age in our study group. Among 55 patients, three of them had disease onset at the age less than one-year-old, which were 0.1, 0.25, 0.25 years old respectively. The patient diagnosed as BD at 0.1 years old has been reported as a case report [24]. The case presented with oral ulcer, genital ulcer, and associated GI symptoms, and no evidence of infection were identified after serial studies. She had high serum level of CRP (20 mg/dl) and ESR (90 mm/hr) initially. The symptoms resolved after treatment with short-course of prednisolone and the baby was clinically asymptomatic after 2 months old. There were also other case reports of neonatal BD from Turkey, UK, and Canada [25,26,27,28]. Hence despite being rare, diagnosis of BD should be considered in a neonate even if the full diagnostic criteria are not met. The other two cases had symptoms at infancy but fulfilled BD diagnosis at 2 and 3 years old respectively. Both of them had persistent symptoms when they grew up and eventually received anti-TNF alpha therapy.

Specific treatment guidelines for JBD are not available. The EULAR recommends BD treatment should be individualized according to age and gender, the type and severity of organ involvement, and a patient’s preferences [8]. Our data showed that the most frequently used treatments were prednisolone and colchicine, and these comprised first-line therapy for JBD. Compared with the findings from previous studies conducted in other countries, prednisolone was used more frequently in our patients [22, 23, 29]. Among the patients who received oral prednisolone, 24.3% had uveitis and 26.8% presented with gastrointestinal involvements, both of which are associated with poor prognoses [8, 16], and more aggressive treatment was required. Given the rapid responses to systemic corticosteroids and the limited data describing other medications administered to patients with JBD, corticosteroids remain a good choice for short-term therapy.

We found that the patients who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy had used corticosteroids for longer durations and they had used more types of DMARDs and immunosuppressants before they received anti-TNF-alpha therapy. The BDCAF scores were 7 or 8 out of a total score of 20 before they received anti-TNF alpha therapy. Hence, these patients may not have a very severe disease entity but had a refractory disease course even after multiple conventional treatments. Our analysis showed that the patients who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy were younger at disease onset, and two patients were diagnosed with JBD in infancy. The influence of age on JBD has not been described. In addition, the JBD patients who received anti-TNF-alpha therapy had higher serum CRP levels at the time of disease onset and higher rates of gastrointestinal symptoms and arthritis/arthralgia. Intestinal involvement is more frequent in juvenile BD, and its severity can range from mild to hemorrhage or perforation [3]. The disease in patients with intestinal BD sometimes becomes refractory, and other forms of therapeutic intervention and biologics are reported in addition to conventional therapy [14, 15, 30].

TNF-alpha inhibitors treat several rheumatic diseases effectively, even those in children [31, 32]. The findings from several studies that have evaluated the effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in adult BD patients with refractory uveitis, have shown symptom improvements in 43.5–67.7% of the patients [10, 12]. Inoue et al reported the treatment response of adalimumab in adult patients with refractory intestinal BD. Sixty percent of the patients showed marked improvements and 20% of them attained complete remission [13]. Among the 6 patients receiving anti-TNF-alpha therapy, we used adalimumab for the two patients with uveitis based on our experience in the treatment of uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis [33, 34]. Furthermore, adalimumab could be reimbursed by the National Health Insurance in Taiwan for patients with uveitis. However, for BD patients with GI tract involvement, adalimumab is an out of pocket expense. Infliximab was not available in Taiwan during the period when our patients had the disease. The other four patients chose etanercept as it was a cheaper choice of anti-TNF alpha agent for these patients. Our results indicated the effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in JBD patients whose symptoms were refractory to conventional treatments. Four patients experienced complete symptom remissions and steroid sparing within 6 months. The remaining two patients had partial responses, and their conditions remained stable without disease progression. The reduced BDCAF scores, the changes in the steroid doses and the immunosuppressant load scores after anti-TNF-alpha therapy provided indirect evidence of the patients’ treatment responses, especially after 6–12 months of treatment.

Though several large-scale clinical trials of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in adult BD were conducted, there was a lack of similar trials in pediatric patients. We searched the Medline database published from January 2000 till December 2018 via PubMed. The searching keywords included “Behçet’s disease”, either “child” or “pediatric”, and either “anti-tumor necrosis factor” or “infliximab.” The references which had been cited in other related case report were also reviewed. Literature without full text or in a non-English language was excluded. We found seven case reports and series reported anti-TNF-alpha therapy for refractory JBD [14,15,16, 35,36,37,38]. The details of the reported cases were listed in Table 5. Combining our cases with the previous seven reports of JBD with anti-TNF alpha therapy in literature, there were a total of 18 JBD patients receiving anti-TNF alpha agents. There were more female patients (11/18). The median disease onset age was 10 years old with a range of 2 to 15 years old. The most commonly involved organs in these patients were cutaneous lesions (6/18) and intestinal involvement (6/18), followed by ocular lesions (4/18). Use of adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept have been reported respectively. Ten patients were treated with etanercept, six patients received infliximab, and three of them used adalimumab. Among the 18 cases, fifteen of them had favorable outcomes after treatment, especially in intestinal and ocular lesions, but three patients failed to show any significant improvement, including two cases with Budd-Chiari syndrome. There were some side effects which were mainly non-serious infection. Combining these previous studies and our studies together, using anti-TNF-alpha therapy may be beneficial and safe for refractory JBD patients.

Table 5 Review of reported cases with juvenile Behçet’s disease who received anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy in the literature
Full size table

Nevertheless, the anti-TNF-alpha therapy did not cure the JBD patients optimally, as we expected. Two patients in our study experienced disease flares after we reduced the frequency of the anti-TNF-alpha therapy. A previous study reported disease relapses occurred in 58.6% of the adult BD patients 1 year after the anti-TNF-alpha treatments were discontinued [39]. Further investigations are required to determine the timing of treatment cessation. Our group also included a patient who did not reach complete remission until he received tocilizumab, which is a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, 1.4 years after using etanercept. This patient does not use any drugs other than tocilizumab currently. Some publications describe refractory BD patients who received tocilizumab [40,41,42], but the effectiveness of the treatment varied, and limited numbers of BD patients are described. As evidence of the pathogenesis underlying BD continues to emerge, more therapeutic options become available for severe BD. Large-scale trials that investigate the treatment of BD patients, and especially JBD patients, with biologics are necessary to enable the development of more effective and safe treatments.

This study has some limitations. First, this was a retrospective study, and recall and selection biases existed. Second, a relatively small number of patients received anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Third, not all enrolled cases were evaluated by disease severity score. Nevertheless, this was a relatively large retrospective study of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in Asian JBD patients. Although further larger prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in JBD patients, it seems that anti-TNF therapy might play an important role for refractory JBD.

Conclusions

Most of the JBD patients who received corticosteroid- or colchicine-based treatments had favorable outcomes; however, a small proportion of these patients had refractory disease courses even after receiving conventional medication. We found that patients who were younger at disease onset, had higher serum CRP levels at baseline, and presented with gastrointestinal symptoms tended to have poor response to our traditional standard treatments. Anti-TNF-alpha therapy was effective and safe in these patients and it showed corticosteroid- and immunosuppressant-sparing effects.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are derived from chart review and are not publicly available due to data privacy concerns, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

5-ASA:

Mesalazine

ADA:

Adalimumab

aTNF:

Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy

AZA:

Azathioprine

BD:

Behçet’s disease

CRP:

C-reactive protein

CsA:

Cyclosporine

DMARDs:

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

ETN:

Etanercept

HCQ:

Hydroxychloroquine

ICBD:

International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease

JBD:

Juvenile Behçet’s Disease

NSAID:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

PD:

Prednisolone

PEDBD:

Pediatric Behçet’s Disease

Th1:

Type-1 T helper

Th17:

Type-17 T helper

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

References

  1. Sakane T, et al. Behçet's disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(17):1284–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greco A, et al. Behcet’s disease: new insights into pathophysiology, clinical features and treatment options. Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17(6):567–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krause I, et al. Childhood Behcet’s disease: clinical features and comparison with adult-onset disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38(5):457–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koné-Paut I, et al. Consensus classification criteria for paediatric Behçet's disease from a prospective observational cohort: PEDBD. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(6):958–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. See LC, et al. Sex- and age-specific incidence of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in the Chinese population: a Taiwan population-based study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;43(3):381–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karincaoglu Y, et al. Demographic and clinical properties of juvenile-onset Behcet’s disease: A controlled multicenter study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(4):579–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sungur GK, et al. Clinical and demographic evaluation of Behcet disease among different paediatric age groups. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(1):83–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hatemi G, et al. 2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of Behcet's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(6):808–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanida S, et al. Adalimumab for the treatment of Japanese patients with intestinal Behcet’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(5):940–8 e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vallet H, et al. Efficacy of anti-TNF alpha in severe and/or refractory Behcet's disease: multicenter study of 124 patients. J Autoimmun. 2015;62:67–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yazici H, et al. Behçet syndrome: a contemporary view. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018;14:107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Calvo-Rio V, et al. Anti-TNF-alpha therapy in patients with refractory uveitis due to Behcet's disease: a 1-year follow-up study of 124 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(12):2223–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Inoue N, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of adalimumab for intestinal Behcet's disease in the open label study following a phase 3 clinical trial. Intest Res. 2017;15(3):395–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Saulsbury FT, Mann JA. Treatment with infliximab for a child with Behcet's disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49(4):599–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaneko U, et al. Two patients with childhood-onset Behcet's disease successfully treated by anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi. 2010;33(3):157–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe S, et al. A young girl with refractory intestinal Behcet's disease: a case report and review of literatures on pediatric cases who received an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(12):3105–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhakta BB, et al. Behcet’s disease: evaluation of a new instrument to measure clinical activity. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38(8):728–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nussenblatt RB, et al. Initial evaluation of subcutaneous daclizumab treatments for noninfectious uveitis: a multicenter noncomparative interventional case series. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(5):764–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. International Study Group for Behçet’s, D. Criteria for diagnosis of Behcet’s disease. Lancet. 1990;335(8697):1078–80.

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Team for the Revision of the International Criteria for Behcet’s, D. The international criteria for Behcet's disease (ICBD): a collaborative study of 27 countries on the sensitivity and specificity of the new criteria. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(3):338–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Batu ED, et al. The performance of different classification criteria in paediatric Behcet’s disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35(Suppl 108(6)):119–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nanthapisal S, et al. Paediatric Behçet’s disease: a UK tertiary Centre experience. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(10):2509–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gallizzi R, et al. A national cohort study on pediatric Behcet's disease: cross-sectional data from an Italian registry. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15(1):84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang YS, Yang YH, Chiang BL. Neonatal Behcet's disease without maternal history. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(12):1641–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fain, O., et al., Neonatal Behçet’s disease. Vol. 98. 1995. 310–311.

  26. A Lewis, M. and B. L Priestley, Transient neonatal Behçet’s disease Vol. 61. 1986. 805–806.

  27. Thivolet, J., F. Cambazard, and M. F Genvo, [Maternally-transmitted severe neonatal aphthosis]. Vol. 109. 1982. 815–816.

  28. G Fam, A., et al., Neonatal Behcet’s Syndrome in an Infant of a Mother with the Disease Vol. 40. 1981. 509–512.

  29. Kone-Paut I, et al. Registries in rheumatological and musculoskeletal conditions. Paediatric Behcet’s disease: an international cohort study of 110 patients. One-year follow-up data. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(1):184–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Matsumura K, Nakase H, Chiba T. Efficacy of oral tacrolimus on intestinal Behcet’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16(2):188–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Murdaca G, Colombo BM, Puppo F. Anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors: a new therapeutic approach for inflammatory immune-mediated diseases: an update upon efficacy and adverse events. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009;22(3):557–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Monaco C, et al. Anti-TNF therapy: past, present and future. Int Immunol. 2015;27(1):55–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brinkman DMC, et al. Treatment choices of paediatric rheumatologists for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: etanercept or adalimumab? Rheumatology. 2013;52(9):1674–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Simonini G, et al. Current therapeutic approaches to autoimmune chronic uveitis in children. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9(10):674–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Robinson AB, Gallentine WB, Rabinovich CE. Pediatric neuro-Behcet’s disease responsive to adalimumab. Pediatr Neurol. 2010;43(4):291–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cantarini L, et al. Safety and efficacy of etanercept in children with juvenile-onset Behcets disease. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009;22(2):551–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Evereklioglu C, Borlu M. Sustained remission after infliximab in a child with vasculitis refractory to conventional immunosuppressives including interferon-α. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(8):1034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Seyahi E, et al. Infliximab in the treatment of hepatic vein thrombosis (Budd-Chiari syndrome) in three patients with Behçet’s syndrome. Rheumatology. 2007;46(7):1213–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sfikakis PP, et al. Brief report: drug-free long-term remission in severe Behcet’s disease following withdrawal of successful anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(12):2380–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Caso F, et al. Refractory pemphigus foliaceus and Behcet’s disease successfully treated with tocilizumab. Immunol Res. 2013;56(2–3):390–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Diamantopoulos AP, Hatemi G. Lack of efficacy of tocilizumab in mucocutaneous Behcet’s syndrome: report of two cases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(10):1923–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Deroux A, Chiquet C, Bouillet L. Tocilizumab in severe and refractory Behcet’s disease: four cases and literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;45(6):733–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Changde Street, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, Taiwan

    Ya-Chiao Hu, Yao-Hsu Yang, Yu-Tsan Lin, Li-Chieh Wang, Hsin-Hui Yu, Jyh-Hong Lee & Bor-Luen Chiang

Authors
  1. Ya-Chiao Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yao-Hsu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu-Tsan Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li-Chieh Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hsin-Hui Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jyh-Hong Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bor-Luen Chiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YCH designed the project, collected and analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. YHY conceived and designed the project, collected the data, drafted and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript for submission. YTL, LCW, HHY, and JHL designed the project and collected the data. BLC conceived and designed the project, and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao-Hsu Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by National Taiwan University’s Hospital Research Ethics Committee (IRB approval number: 201710060RINC).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, YC., Yang, YH., Lin, YT. et al. Clinical manifestations and anti-TNF alpha therapy of juvenile Behçet’s disease in Taiwan. BMC Pediatr 19, 232 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1613-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1613-5

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us