Skip to main content
Download PDF

An explorative study on proteomic analyses related to inflammation and pain in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BMC Pediatrics volume 23, Article number: 365 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Our aim was attempting to find proteins involved in the pain process and correlating with pain but not degree of inflammation in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), using a proteomics panel.

Methods

A total of 87 plasma samples were collected from 51 children with JIA (51 at diagnosis in a higher disease activity state, 18 at follow-up in a lower disease activity state) and 18 healthy controls. Relative levels of 92 proteins related to a wide range of biological processes in inflammation were obtained using a proximity extension assay panel. Comparisons between children with and without JIA, in different disease categories, by juvenile disease activity score (JADAS27) and degree of pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS), were performed using parametric and non-parametric statistical methods.

Results

Nineteen proteins involved in arthritic inflammation, such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and S100 protein A12, were higher in patients with JIA than controls, seven decreased significantly during treatment, and 18 correlated significantly with JADAS27. Three proteins correlated with pain VAS scores in unadjusted analyses: the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), transforming growth factor beta, and IL-18R1. Levels of GDNF correlated significantly with pain VAS scores but not with JADAS27.

Conclusions

Plasma levels of 18 of 92 tested proteins correlated with degree of disease activity. Levels of three proteins correlated with pain, and levels of one, GDNF, originating from neural cells, correlated with pain without correlating with inflammatory degree, suggesting that it may play a role in pain in JIA. Further studies in larger cohorts are warranted.

Peer Review reports

Background

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease during childhood. JIA is an umbrella term used to describe a heterogeneous autoimmune disease comprising seven categories, all presenting with an arthritis for at least six weeks with onset before 16 years of age [1].

Many cells and proteins are involved in the inflammatory and pain processes in JIA. Some proteins are well-studied in JIA-related inflammation, e.g., tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), IL-1, IL-6, and the S100 proteins. The IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that mediates acute phase reactions and is produced in a number of different cells. The S100 proteins, S100A12 and S100A8/9, originate from neutrophils and monocytes and are studied for disease activity in JIA [2, 3]. They have also been studied as possible indicators of risk of reactivation, without convincing results [4].

In addition to control of inflammation, a key goal of JIA treatment is to reduce pain, yet assessment of pain has not been incorporated in composite outcome measures for JIA [5]. The mechanism of pain in JIA is not fully understood and the experience of pain is related to many factors, for example disease activity, psychosocial situation, comorbidity, and quality of sleep. Many components are involved in the pain signaling system and so far there are no known specific biomarkers for pain in JIA. When monitoring disease activity, the focus has been on identifying biomarkers involved in inflammation. Inflammatory biomarkers in arthritis are often also described to relate to degree of pain, but children with JIA commonly report pain even when there are no signs of inflammatory activity [6, 7].

Studies analyzing multiple proteins/cytokines in JIA are rare and focused mainly on systemic JIA [8, 9]. Cytokine patterns most likely differ between the six disease categories, excepting the systemic category, but we have no knowledge of the extent to which they do so. In a study by Brescia et al., significant differences were observed in levels of cytokines associated with inflammation in synovial fluid samples from children with JIA compared to controls [10]. One study using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analyzed the serum proteome in 15 children with JIA and found 14 inflammatory and non-inflammatory proteins correlating significantly with clinical pain severity [11].

We used the inflammatory proteomics panel by Olink [12] to analyze concentrations of 92 proteins involved in a wide range of biological processes in inflammation and related the results to disease activity and pain in children with JIA.

Methods

Patients

In this clinical explorative study, we prospectively included 51 children at the Unit of Pediatric Rheumatology, Uppsala University Hospital, between 2017 and 2019. The participants were diagnosed and classified with JIA based on the International League of Association for Rheumatology criteria [1]. Children with systemic JIA were excluded because of its different pathophysiology compared with other disease categories. The 51 patients with JIA were examined in a highly active disease state, directly after confirmed diagnosis but before receiving any other treatment than non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs. Eighteen of the 51 children, randomly chosen, were also examined at follow-up in a lower disease activity state, during (or after) medical treatment. The numbers of children in different disease categories, excluding the systemic category, were largely representative of disease occurrence in the general population.

Healthy children

We also included pre-operatively collected blood samples of 18 healthy children admitted for minor surgery. Exclusion criteria were medication for any disease, presence of any inflammatory disease, diabetes or any atopic disease with continuous medication or special diet because of intolerance. Blood samples were drawn before surgery.

Methods

In addition to blood sampling, study visits included assessment of the juvenile disease activity score (JADAS27) for monitoring disease activity in the children with JIA and scoring of pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) (0–10 cm). Eighteen of the 51 children with JIA had a follow-up study visit. The JADAS27 comprises a joint count (0–27 active joints), patient-reported global assessment of well-being on a VAS (0 – 10 cm) (assessed by a parent if the child is ≤ 9 years old), physician’s global assessment of disease activity on VAS (0 –10 cm) and normalized erythrocyte sedimentation rate ((E-SR in mm/h)—20)/10) to a scale (0–10) with a maximum total score of 57 [13].

Blood samples were centrifuged, aliquoted, and frozen in -70 °C within 3.5 h. In addition to analyses of E-SR, C-reactive protein, and leukocytes in children with JIA, we used an inflammatory proteomics panel, performed by Olink (Sweden) in all 87 samples. The method is based on a well-characterized nucleic acid proximity-based assay using antibodies, called Proximity Extension Assay, with good performance in plasma samples (http://www.olink.com/). Results are presented as normal protein expression (NPX) values, which are relative quantification values and not exact levels of the protein biomarkers.

Statistical methods

Demographic data were given using descriptive statistics with interquartile range (IQR) and median (Md). The Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparisons of two groups. For differences in clinical features before and during treatment, the related samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used (Additional Table 1). Independent samples T-test was performed for comparison of the 19 significant biomarkers and the difference between children with JIA and controls (Additional Table 3). Adjustment for age was performed with linear regression in Additional Tables 4 and 5. Adjustment for age and gender was performed in Spearman’s rank correlation analyses between NPX-levels and pain VAS in the 51 children with JIA (Table 3). A paired samples T-test was used for comparison of paired samples in 18 children with follow-up data. Spearman’s rank correlation and partial correlation (adjusted for age and gender) analyses were used for the evaluation of associations between biomarker levels and JADAS27 as well as pain VAS scores. All results are presented both with and without adjustment for multiple testing, using the Benjamini–Hochberg method [14]. All tests were considered significant if p < 0.05. Analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 28 (SPSS Inc., Illinois, USA).

Table 1 Demographic data for 51 children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and 18 healthy children
Full size table

Results

Demographic data of study participants is presented in Table 1. The 51 children with JIA had a median age at inclusion of 10.4 years. Six of the seven categories of the International League of Associations for Rheumatology were represented. Eighteen of the 51 children had follow-up examinations at a Md of 7 (IQR 5.2–8.8) months. The medical treatment at the time of follow-up examination is presented, but not the medical treatments given between baseline and follow-up. Clinical and conventional laboratory variables are presented in Additional Table 1. During follow-up, JADAS27 decreased from Md 11.3 (IQR 7.4–18.9) to 2.6 (IQR 0.3–3.7), p < 0.001. The E-SR decreased in the 18 children from Md 24.0 (IQR 9.5–41.5) to Md 7.5 (IQR 2.0–10.8) mm, p < 0.001. Levels of pain and JADAS27 in the different disease categories are shown in Additional Table 2. Figure 1 shows the six proteins differing most significantly in NPX values, adjusted for multiple testing, between the 51 children with JIA in an active inflammatory state and controls: IL-6, S100A12, monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3), oncostatin M (OSM), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). Additional Table 3 presents all 19 proteins differing significantly in NPX values between the 51 children with JIA in an active inflammatory state and controls. The results were significant even after adjustment for multiple testing. The 18 healthy children had a lower age at inclusion than the 51 children with JIA, but after adjusting for age, using linear regression analyses, there was still a significant difference between groups (Additional Table 4). Because of a skewed gender distribution in children with JIA compared to controls with only three girls in the control group, we performed an analysis using linear regression in the two groups of boys, 17 with JIA and 15 healthy boys (Additional Table 5). The difference between boys with JIA and healthy boys remained very similar to the analysis in both genders. We also made a principal component analysis (PCA) -plot in the 51 children with JIA at inclusion and observed no clear gender-based groupings (Additional Fig. 1). The results of the entire Olink panel are presented in Additional Table 6.

Table 2 Changes in normal protein expression (NPX)-levels in 14 of 92 inflammatory proteins/cytokines in paired samples during medical treatment in 18 children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Boxplots presenting normal protein expression (NPX) values, adjusted for multiple analyses, of the six proteins differing most significantly between 51 children with JIA and 18 controls, from a panel of 92 inflammatory proteins. The p-value was < 0.001 in all six analyses, according to independent samples T-test

Full size image
Table 3 Correlations between normal protein expression (NPX)-levels in six of 92 inflammatory proteins/cytokines and pain visual analogue scale (VAS 0–10 cm) in 50 children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in an active disease state adjusted for age and gender
Full size table
Table 4 Correlations between normal protein expression (NPX)-levels in 25 of 92 inflammatory proteins versus JADAS 27 scores (0–57) in 50 children (missing data in one child) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in an active disease state adjusted for age and gender
Full size table

The 14 most significant differences in plasma levels of proteins in paired samples from 18 children with JIA are shown in Table 2. For example, NPX values of IL-6, IL-20, and TNFSF14 decreased during medical treatment, while levels of TRANCE, TNFB and TRAIL increased significantly.

The correlations between NPX values of proteins and degree of pain (VAS) in 50 (missing in one) children with JIA, adjusted for age and gender before and after adjustment for multiple testing, are presented in Table 3. Proteins IL-18R1, TGFβ, GDNF, FGF21 and VEGFA correlated significantly with degree of pain before adjustment for multiple testing. Correlations between NPX values and JADAS27, adjusted for age and gender are presented in Table 4. The S100A12, matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), IL-6, TNFSF14 and LIF correlated significantly with JADAS27 also after adjustment for multiple testing. The NPX value of GDNF (adjusted for age and gender) did not correlate significantly with JADAS27, correlation coefficient 0.18, adjusted p-value 0.38 from multiple testing.

All results of analyses in tables and figures are presented with corrections made for multiple testing, except the analyses of protein levels in relation to degree of pain, where we have chosen to also present unadjusted results.

Discussion

Plasma levels of 19 of 92 tested proteins involved in biological processes related to inflammation were higher in 51 JIA patients at diagnosis, in a high disease activity state, than in controls. Following treatment, a decrease in levels of inflammatory proteins was observed in the 18 participants with follow-up samples. The JADAS27 reflecting disease activity correlated with several proteins. Five proteins correlated in unadjusted analyses with pain assessed on VAS (GDNF, TGFβ, IL-18R1, FGF21 and VEGFA). Levels of GDNF, a protein involved in pain processes, correlated significantly with pain VAS scores but not with JADAS27, after adjustment for age and gender.

The well-known inflammatory proteins involved in JIA, IL-6 and S100A12, were observed at higher levels in plasma samples from patients compared with controls and decreased during treatment. Plasma IL-6 levels correlated significantly with disease activity (JADAS27), findings in line with earlier results [2]. IL-6 is also the target of one of the medications used for treatment of JIA [15]. Other proteins significantly higher in plasma from children with JIA than in controls were monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3), a protein known to mobilize monocytes involved in the inflammatory response [16], as well as oncostatin M (OSM), which has a potentially pro-inflammatory role in arthritis [17], and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), involved in angiogenesis and tissue regeneration [18].

Levels of the cytokine IL-20, with the capacity to increase the proliferation of synovial cells and promote neutrophil chemotaxis [19] were lower in low than high disease activity, as were those of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNFSF14, involved in T-cell homing [20]. The cytokines TRANCE, TRAIL, and TNFB increased during treatment in our study. These cytokines are all related to the TNF cytokine family and according to the manufacturers, the TNFB results could be explained by the assay measuring both unbound TNF and TNF in complex with medical agents. This has been shown in a study on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as well [21]. The children with JIA in this study were mainly treated with a TNF-inhibitor and a folate antagonist. Modifications by methotrexate on cytokine profiles are still unclear [22] and cytokines are also to some extent dependent on each other.

As late as 18 years after onset, many patients with JIA have an ongoing active disease with high burden of medication [23]. Pain in JIA is associated with fatigue leading to functional difficulties [6, 24, 25]. Pain and fatigue decrease a child’s ability to participate in activities like social life, school, and sports [26,27,28]. Even a minimal pain reduction improves the quality of life in these children [29]. Earlier research has shown that median pressure point threshold, reflecting pain tolerance, is lower in children with JIA than in controls, also in areas of the body not close to affected joints [30, 31]. This knowledge supports an altered pain perception, indicating a damage in the peripheral nerve system, a sensitization caused by the disease process. In one study, early pain severity was associated with a more severe disease outcome 15–18 years after onset, highlighting the importance of pain in disease process [32].

Many proteins involved in the inflammatory process are recognized as important mediators of inflammatory pain [33], including proteins originating from neurons [34]. It has become apparent that there is an interaction between the immune and nervous system in steady state as well as under pathological circumstances. IL-6 is involved in inflammation as well as in the pain process [15, 35]. In our study, IL-6 correlated significantly with inflammation but not with degree of pain. Other studies have shown that IL-6 is one of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, released by stimulation of TNFα, triggering the release of the final inflammatory mediator prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and sympathetic amines that directly sensitize the nociceptors [36]. In studies of mice, IL-6 has been shown to be directly involved in the pain process of inflammatory arthritis [37].

Interestingly, plasma GDNF levels were higher in children with JIA than controls, also after adjustment for age and gender and correlated with pain in unadjusted analyses, but not with disease activity. GDNF is found in both the peripheral and the central nervous systems, but is present mainly in the peripheral neurons, particularly in the dorsal root ganglion, and in spinal dorsal horn neurons [34]. Many cell types synthesize and secrete GDNF, including glial cells, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, Schwann cells, motor neurons, and skeletal muscle cells [38]. GDNF is a neurotrophic factor and has been found to have a neuroprotective function in the brain, protecting dopaminergic neurons, but lately it has been found to take part in nociception and pain [34]. GDNF has been shown to have an anti-nociceptive modulating role in neuropathic pain, but in experimental models of inflammatory pain it has been seen to have a pro-nociceptive effect, which could explain our findings [34, 39].

In addition to GDNF, levels of TGFβ and IL-18R1 correlated with pain. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes from patients with JIA have presented with a dysregulated TGFβ signaling compared with controls [40]. TGFβ in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid has been shown to be a biological indicator of chronic pain in patients with osteoarthritis [41] and the pro-inflammatory protein IL18 has been shown to be associated with disease activity in RA and JIA but not specifically related to degree of pain [42, 43]. Our results relate to the receptor for IL18, IL18R1, which is essential for IL18-mediated signal transduction.

The study cohort was small and drawing of conclusions must be cautious. One must consider the difficulty in interpretation of multiple cytokines in such a heterogeneous disease. A low NPX value corresponds to a lower relative concentration of a biomarker, but the NPX value of each protein is dependent on levels of all the other proteins in the analysis [12]. When comparing plasma protein levels between groups as well as in correlation analyses between NPX-levels and pain VAS results, we corrected for age and gender. We found no obvious influence on the comparisons of either of them but this should be explored in a larger cohort.

We could only find one other study that has explored a wide panel of pain-associated proteins in JIA [11]. Since the method used and the proteins studied are different, we cannot make any comparisons, but both studies support that non-inflammatory mechanisms may be involved in the pain process of those children. Our results on several cytokines involved in inflammation in JIA are in line with earlier studies. This is supportive for our results on cytokines in relation to pain and we aim to perform more, larger studies to further evaluate our findings.

Conclusions

In this explorative study of plasma proteomics analyses related to inflammation and pain in JIA, we found that levels of proteins differed between children with JIA and controls, and that levels of some proteins also correlated with degree of pain, irrespective of age or gender. Levels of GDNF, originating from neural cells, correlated with degree of pain but not degree of inflammation. In the search for a pain-related biomarker in JIA that is not primarily explained by inflammation, GDNF could be a possible candidate for further studies.

Availability of data and materials

One main dataset is presented in Additional Table 6. Other datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GDNF:

Glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor

HGF:

Hepatocyte growth factor

IL:

Interleukin

IL18R1:

Interleukin 18 receptor 1

IQR:

Interquartile range

JADAS27:

Juvenile arthritis disease activity score 27 joints

JIA:

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Md:

Median

MMP-1:

Matrix metalloproteinase 1

NPX:

Normal protein expression

OSM:

Oncostatin M

PCA:

Principal component analysis

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

S100A12:

S100 protein A12

TGFβ:

Transforming growth factor beta

TNFB:

Tumor necrosis factor B

TNFSF14:

Tumor necrosis factor super family member 14

TNFα:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

TRAIL:

TNF related apoptosis inducing ligand

TRANCE:

Tumor necrosis factor related activation-induced cytokine

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

References

  1. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, et al. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foell D, Wittkowski H, Hammerschmidt I, Wulffraat N, Schmeling H, Frosch M, et al. Monitoring neutrophil activation in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis by S100A12 serum concentrations. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(4):1286–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frosch M, Strey A, Vogl T, Wulffraat NM, Kuis W, Sunderkotter C, et al. Myeloid-related proteins 8 and 14 are specifically secreted during interaction of phagocytes and activated endothelium and are useful markers for monitoring disease activity in pauciarticular-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(3):628–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hinze CH, Foell D, Johnson AL, Spalding SJ, Gottlieb BS, Morris PW, et al. Serum S100A8/A9 and S100A12 Levels in Children With Polyarticular Forms of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Relationship to Maintenance of Clinically Inactive Disease During Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy and Occurrence of Disease Flare After Discontinuation of Therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(3):451–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Giancane G, Alongi A, Rosina S, Calandra S, Consolaro A, Ravelli A. Open issues in the assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35 Suppl 107(5):123–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bromberg MH, Connelly M, Anthony KK, Gil KM, Schanberg LE. Self-reported pain and disease symptoms persist in juvenile idiopathic arthritis despite treatment advances: an electronic diary study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(2):462–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lomholt JJ, Thastum M, Herlin T. Pain experience in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with anti-TNF agents compared to non-biologic standard treatment. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2013;11(1):21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sato H, Inoue Y, Kawashima Y, Nakajima D, Ishikawa M, Konno R, et al. In-Depth Serum Proteomics by DIA-MS with In Silico Spectral Libraries Reveals Dynamics during the Active Phase of Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. ACS Omega. 2022;7(8):7012–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Qu H, Sundberg E, Aulin C, Neog M, Palmblad K, Horne AC, et al. Immunoprofiling of active and inactive systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis reveals distinct biomarkers: a single-center study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2021;19(1):173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brescia AC, Simonds MM, Sullivan KE, Rose CD. Secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and loss of regulatory signals by fibroblast-like synoviocytes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2017;11(5–6):1600088.

  11. Van Der Heijden H, Fatou B, Sibai D, Hoyt K, Taylor M, Cheung K, et al. Proteomics based markers of clinical pain severity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2022;20(1):3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Assarsson E, Lundberg M, Holmquist G, Bjorkesten J, Thorsen SB, Ekman D, et al. Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e95192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Consolaro A, Giancane G, Schiappapietra B, Davi S, Calandra S, Lanni S, et al. Clinical outcome measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016;14(1):23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate - a Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J R Stat Soc B. 1995;57(1):289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Akioka S. Interleukin-6 in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29(2):275–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Szekanecz Z, Vegvari A, Szabo Z, Koch AE. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in arthritis. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2010;2(1):153–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hintzen C, Quaiser S, Pap T, Heinrich PC, Hermanns HM. Induction of CCL13 expression in synovial fibroblasts highlights a significant role of oncostatin M in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(7):1932–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagashima M, Hasegawa J, Kato K, Yamazaki J, Nishigai K, Ishiwata T, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), HGF activator, and c-Met in synovial tissues in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(8):1772–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rutz S, Wang X, Ouyang W. The IL-20 subfamily of cytokines–from host defence to tissue homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(12):783–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shui JW, Steinberg MW, Kronenberg M. Regulation of inflammation, autoimmunity, and infection immunity by HVEM-BTLA signaling. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;89(4):517–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Berkhout LC, L’Ami MJ, Ruwaard J, Hart MH, Heer PO-D, Bloem K, et al. Dynamics of circulating TNF during adalimumab treatment using a drug-tolerant TNF assay. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(477):eaat3356.

  22. Fernández V, Aguilar R. Folic Acid Antagonists: Antimicrobial and Immunomodulating Mechanisms and Applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):4996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Glerup M, Rypdal V, Arnstad ED, Ekelund M, Peltoniemi S, Aalto K, et al. Long-term outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 18 years of follow-up in the population-based Nordic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72(4):507–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Armbrust W, Siers NE, Lelieveld OTHM, Mouton LJ, Tuinstra J, Sauer P. Fatigue in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A systematic review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;45(5):587–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Butbul Aviel Y, Stremler R, Benseler SM, Cameron B, Laxer RM, Ota S, et al. Sleep and fatigue and the relationship to pain, disease activity and quality of life in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology. 2011;50(11):2051–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gutierrez-Suarez R, Pistorio A, Cespedes Cruz A, Norambuena X, Flato B, Rumba I, et al. Health-related quality of life of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis coming from 3 different geographic areas. The PRINTO multinational quality of life cohort study. Rheumatology. 2006;46(2):314–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schanberg LE, Anthony KK, Gil KM, Maurin EC. Daily pain and symptoms in children with polyarticular arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(5):1390–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss JE, Luca NJ, Boneparth A, Stinson J. Assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Paediatr Drugs. 2014;16(6):473–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dhanani S, Quenneville J, Perron M, Abdolell M, Feldman BM. Minimal difference in pain associated with change in quality of life in children with rheumatic disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;47(5):501–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leegaard A, Lomholt JJ, Thastum M, Herlin T. Decreased Pain Threshold in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Study. J Rheumatol. 2013;40(7):1212–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cornelissen L, Donado C, Kim J, Chiel L, Zurakowski D, Logan DE, et al. Pain hypersensitivity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a quantitative sensory testing study. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2014;12(1):39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Arnstad ED, Rypdal V, Peltoniemi S, Herlin T, Berntson L, Fasth A, et al. Early Self-Reported Pain in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis as Related to Long-Term Outcomes: Results From the Nordic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71(7):961–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Raoof R, Willemen H, Eijkelkamp N. Divergent roles of immune cells and their mediators in pain. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(3):429–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferrini F, Salio C, Boggio EM, Merighi A. Interplay of BDNF and GDNF in the Mature Spinal Somatosensory System and Its Potential Therapeutic Relevance. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19(8):1225–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Goncalves Dos Santos G, Delay L, Yaksh TL, Corr M. Neuraxial Cytokines in Pain States. Front Immunol. 2019;10:3061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Magalhães SF, Manzo LP, Faria FM, Oliveira-Fusaro MC, Nishijima CM, Vieira WF, et al. Inflammatory pain in peripheral tissue depends on the activation of the TNF-α type 1 receptor in the primary afferent neuron. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;53(2):376–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kwok CHT, Learoyd AE, Canet-Pons J, Trang T, Fitzgerald M. Spinal interleukin-6 contributes to central sensitisation and persistent pain hypersensitivity in a model of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;90:145–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cintron-Colon AF, Almeida-Alves G, Boynton AM, Spitsbergen JM. GDNF synthesis, signaling, and retrograde transport in motor neurons. Cell Tissue Res. 2020;382(1):47–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Merighi A. Targeting the glial-derived neurotrophic factor and related molecules for controlling normal and pathologic pain. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20(2):193–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brescia AC, Simonds MM, McCahan SM, Fawcett PT, Rose CD. The role of transforming growth factor beta signaling in fibroblast-like synoviocytes from patients with oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: dysregulation of transforming growth factor beta signaling, including overexpression of bone morphogenetic protein 4, may lead to a chondrocyte phenotype and may contribute to bony hypertrophy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(5):1352–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu YC, Hsiao HT, Wang JC, Wen TC, Chen SL. TGF-beta1 in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid can be used as a biological indicator of chronic pain in patients with osteoarthritis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0262074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Koper-Lenkiewicz OM, Sutkowska K, Wawrusiewicz-Kurylonek N, Kowalewska E, Matowicka-Karna J. Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, -6, -8, -15, -17, -18, -23, TNF-α) single nucleotide polymorphisms in rheumatoid arthritis—a literature review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(4):2106.

  43. Lotito AP, Campa A, Silva CA, Kiss MH, Mello SB. Interleukin 18 as a marker of disease activity and severity in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(4):823–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Uppsala University. This study was supported by grants from the Department of Women’s and Children’s Health at Uppsala University, the Gillbergska Foundation in Uppsala, as well as from the Swedish Rheumatism Association [R-968023]. The sources of funding were not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis of data, interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or submission for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden

    Andreas Elfving, Arja Harila-Saari, Ludwig Nilsson & Lillemor Berntson

Authors
  1. Andreas Elfving
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arja Harila-Saari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ludwig Nilsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lillemor Berntson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AE shared drafting of the manuscript with LB and took part in interpretation of analyses and revising the manuscript. AH took part in interpretation of analyses and revising the manuscript. LN took part in the study design and performed analyses, interpreted analyses, and revised the manuscript. LB was responsible for collection of patient data and study design, interpretation of analyses and for drafting the manuscript. AE, AH, LN and LB were all responsible for revising and providing final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lillemor Berntson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the regional ethics committee in Uppsala County (reference 2006/327; 2006/327/1; 2006/327/3; 2021–01614). Verbal informed consent was obtained from parents and children. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents and from children at the age of twelve or older. Participation was voluntary and participants could withdraw at any time without giving a reason.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Additional Table 1.

Clinical and conventional laboratory variables in children with JIA.

Additional file 2: Additional Table 2.

Levels of pain and disease activity in the children with JIA included in the study (missing data in one), presented by category of disease.

Additional file 3: Additional Table 3.

Comparison of normal protein expression (NPX)-levels in 19 of 92 inflammatory proteins/cytokines between untreated children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (n = 51) and healthy controls (n = 18).

Additional file 4: Additional Table 4.

Comparison of normal protein expression (NPX)-levels in six of 92 inflammatory proteins/cytokines between untreated children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (n = 51) and healthy controls (n = 18) with adjustment for age.

Additional file 5: Additional Table 5.

Comparison of normal protein expression (NPX)-levels in six of 92 inflammatory proteins/cytokines between untreated boys with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (n = 17) and healthy boys (n = 15) with adjustment for age.

Additional file 6: Additional Table 6.

Olink data Welch two sample T-test healthy controls and high disease activity.

Additional file 7: Additional Figure. 1.

A principal component analysis (PCA) plot presenting the sample-wise distribution of NPX values in 34 girls and 17 boys in a high inflammatory state of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elfving, A., Harila-Saari, A., Nilsson, L. et al. An explorative study on proteomic analyses related to inflammation and pain in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. BMC Pediatr 23, 365 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04181-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04181-0

Keywords

  • Arthritis, juvenile
  • Proteomics
  • Pain
  • GDNF

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us