Skip to main content

Diagnostic aid to subepidermal calcified nodule with dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy: a case report

Abstract

Background

Subepidermal calcified nodule (SCN) is a type of calcinosis cutis that usually occurs in children. The lesions in the SCN resemble those of other skin diseases, such as pilomatrixoma, molluscum contagiosum, and juvenile xanthogranuloma, leading to a high rate of misdiagnoses. Noninvasive in vivo imaging techniques, represented by dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), have dramatically accelerated skin cancer research over the past decade, and their applications have greatly expanded into other skin disorders. However, the features of an SCN in dermoscopy and RCM have yet to be reported previously. Combining these novel approaches with conventional histopathological examinations is a promising method for increasing diagnostic accuracy.

Case presentation

We report on a case of SCN of the eyelid diagnosed with the aid of dermoscopy and RCM. A 14-year-old male patient who presented with a painless yellowish-white papule on his left upper eyelid was previously diagnosed with a common wart. Unfortunately, treatment with recombinant human interferon gel was not effective. To achieve a correct diagnosis, dermoscopy and RCM were performed. The former showed closely grouped multiple yellowish-white clods surrounded by linear vessels, and the latter exhibited hyperrefractile material nests at the dermal–epidermal junction level. The alternative diagnoses were, therefore, excluded because of in vivo characterizations. Subsequent surgical excision, histological examination, and von Kossa staining were performed. Pathology showed hyperkeratosis of the epidermis, a downward-directed basal-layer expansion, and small amorphous basophilic deposits scattered throughout the papillary dermis. The von Kossa staining confirmed calcium deposits in the lesion. An SCN was then diagnosed. During the 6-month follow-up, no relapse was observed.

Conclusions

Patients with SCN could benefit from dermoscopy and RCM, which help achieve an accurate diagnosis. Clinicians should consider the possibility of an SCN for an adolescent patient with painless yellowish-white papules.

Peer Review reports

Background

Subepidermal calcified nodule (SCN) is a subtype of calcinosis cutis, presenting as a solitary, hard, yellowish-white nodule [1]. Patients with SCN can phenotypically mimic and are often misdiagnosed with pilomatrixoma, molluscum contagiosum, and juvenile xanthogranuloma. Histological confirmation was the only practical option for the diagnosis of SCN when the lesions were equivocal on conventional naked-eye examination. The applications of noninvasive imaging techniques such as dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have expanded following advances in the field of skin cancer [2]. These novel techniques can decrease unnecessary surgical biopsies and broaden treatment options. Here, we report a typical case of eyelid SCN and describe its dermoscopy and RCM findings to provide insight into novel approaches to differential diagnosis and management in the future.

Case presentation

A 14-year-old previously healthy male patient presented to our hospital with a painless yellowish-white papule on the left upper eyelid (Fig. 1A). The papule appeared five years previously and gradually became larger without ulceration or bleeding. Before being referred to our hospital, the patient was diagnosed with a common wart. However, treatment with recombinant human interferon gel was not effective. No history of trauma, local skin lesions, or familial similar skin lesions could be found. Cutaneous examination revealed a solitary yellowish-white papule approximately 5 mm in diameter on the upper left eyelid. Dermoscopy showed closely grouped multiple yellowish-white clods surrounded by linear vessels (Fig. 1B). RCM imaging showed nests of hyperrefractile material at the dermal–epidermal junction level and irregular hyperplasia of the epidermis (Fig. 1C). Surgical excision, the most common treatment option for SCN, was performed. A further histopathological examination revealed small amorphous basophilic deposits scattered throughout the papillary dermis with small numbers of lymphocytes, hyperkeratosis of the epidermis, a thickened stratum spinosum, and a downward-directed basal-layer expansion. Neither ghost cells, a feature of pilomatrixoma, nor a granular layer of keratohyalin granules, characteristic of epidermal cysts, were found (Fig. 1D). The presence of calcium deposits was confirmed by von Kossa staining (Fig. 1E). The levels of calcium, phosphorus and parathyroid hormones in the blood were normal. A diagnosis of eyelid SCN was made based on the above examination. The patient remained recurrence-free for the entire follow-up period (6 months).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Clinical presentation of the lesion. A yellowish-white papule on the patient's left upper eyelid; B Dermatoscopy of the lesion shows closely grouped multiple yellowish-white clods surrounded by linear vessels (× 20 magnification); C RCM imaging of the lesion shows nests of hyperrefractile material at the level of the dermal–epidermal junction (green arrows) and irregularly hyperplastic spinous layer (red arrows) (VivaScope 1500, mosaic, 0.5 × 0.5 mm); D Histopathology of the lesion shows small amorphous basophilic deposits scattered throughout the dermis with small numbers of lymphocytes, hyperkeratosis of the epidermis, a thickened stratum spinosum, and a downward-directed basal-layer expansion (HE stain, scale bar = 500 μm); E Von Kossa stain demonstrating numerous black calcium deposits either in the form of small amorphous calcium (blue arrows) or in the form of fine granules (yellow arrows). (von Kossa stain, scale bar = 500 μm)

Discussion and conclusions

Calcinosis cutis can be classified into five major types: dystrophic calcification, metastatic calcification, iatrogenic calcification and traumatic calcinosis cutis, calciphylaxis, and idiopathic calcification [3]. SCN is a rare subtype of idiopathic calcification that usually occurs in healthy individuals and is unrelated to tissue damage, systemic disease, or side effects of treatments. To date, only over a hundred cases of SCN have been reported. The incidence of SCN among men is approximately twice that among women. Seventy-two percent of patients are younger than 18 years old. The lesions present asymptomatic, painless, hard, and freely mobile nodules and can be single (82%) or multiple (18%) [4]. In a few cases, the papule may hemorrhage [5]. Due to the rarity of eyelid SCN, physicians are unfamiliar with this diagnosis, and patients often experience misdiagnosis.

Beyond this, however, its morphological similarities with other skin diseases make SCN challenging to diagnose. It is frequently misdiagnosed as pilomatrixoma, juvenile xanthogranuloma, and molluscum contagiosum. While the naked-eye examination is unreliable in some cases, noninvasive in vivo imaging improves diagnostic accuracy. Dermoscopy is one of the primary imaging modalities used to diagnose cancerous skin lesions, such as melanoma or basal cell carcinoma. Over the last several years, dermoscopy has increasingly been used in the context of general dermatological disorders [6]. RCM is another novel technology that could also provide noninvasive, in vivo imaging of the skin at a near-histological resolution. Here, we showed, for the first time, images of eyelid SCN under dermoscopy and RCM. Dermoscopy showed closely grouped multiple yellowish-white clods surrounded by linear vessels, and RCM showed nests of hyperrefractile material at the dermal–epidermal junction level. These findings may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of SCN and other similar entities (Table 1). Moreover, hematoxylin–eosin (HE) staining showed basophilic materials in a finely granular or lumpy form, and von Kossa staining showed black calcium deposits in the dermis. It has been reported that the histopathological patterns of SCN in children and elderly patients are different [7]. Young patients often show multiple, small calcified bodies within the dermis surrounded by foreign-body giant cells and lymphoplasmacytic chronic inflammation. In contrast, elderly patients present lesions characterized by a single, large, well-demarcated amorphous calcified deposit surrounded by fibrous tissue without chronic inflammation or foreign body reaction. In agreement with this, we found multiple calcium nests in the dermis of this patient. However, it is still being determined why there are two forms of calcified deposits. Further studies are needed.

Table 1 Dermoscopic, reflectance confocal microscopic (RCM) and histopathological features of SCN and its differential diagnoses

Dermoscopy and RCM have been proven more accurate and sensitive than naked-eye examination for detecting skin cancers [17]. Although sensitivity and specificity using these methods cannot be calculated for individual cases, dermoscopy and RCM have suggested some distinctive features of SCN. With an increasing number of cases and the prevalence of noninvasive in vivo imaging, the diagnostic value of dermoscopy and RCM in SCN will be enhanced.

The current treatments for SCN include excision, CO2 laser, conservative care, salicylic acid, and intralesional triamcinolone [4]. The majority of cases are managed using excisional methods. There are two reasons for using excision as a first-line treatment option for SCN. Surgical removal, along with histological examination, is the most effective method of simultaneous treatment and confirmation of diagnosis. Additionally, complete surgical excision can help prevent a recurrence. No recurrence was noted in our patient after surgical excision. Sodium thiosulfate (STS) has been reported as another possible treatment for calcinosis cutis [18], particularly in cases with smaller lesions. However, it is unknown whether it can be used in eyelid SCN. If a diagnosis of SCN can be confirmed with dermoscopy and RCM, topical application of STS may become an option. These methods also allow real-time monitoring of its therapeutic efficacy.

In conclusion, clinicians should consider the possibility of SCN for an adolescent patient with a painless yellowish-white papule. The combination of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy with conventional histopathology helps improve the diagnostic accuracy of SCN.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SCN:

Subepidermal calcified nodule

RCM:

Reflectance confocal microscopy

References

  1. Nico MM, Bergonse FN. Subepidermal calcified nodule: report of two cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001;18(3):227–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghita MA, Caruntu C, Rosca AE, Kaleshi H, Caruntu A, Moraru L, Docea AO, Zurac S, Boda D, Neagu M. Reflectance confocal microscopy and dermoscopy for in vivo, noninvasive skin imaging of superficial basal cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(5):3019–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Reiter N, El-Shabrawi L, Leinweber B, Berghold A, Aberer E. Calcinosis cutis: part I. Diagnostic pathway. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(1):1–12 quiz 13–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel AD, Bellet JS. That’s Not Molluscum! A literature review of 109 cases of subepidermal calcified nodules. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(4):759–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carvounis PE, Santi M, Stern JB, Miller M. Subepidermal calcified nodules. Ophthalmologica. 2005;219(2):112–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lacarrubba F, Ardigo M, Di Stefani A, Verzi AE, Micali G. Dermatoscopy and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Correlations in Nonmelanocytic Disorders. Dermatol Clin. 2018;36(4):487–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. AlWadani S, Suarez MJ, Kass JJ, MacQuaid E, Edward DP, Alkatan H, Eberhart C. Subepidermal Calcified Nodules of the Eyelid Differ in Children and Adults. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;33(4):304–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morales A, Puig S, Malvehy J, Zaballos P. Dermoscopy of molluscum contagiosum. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(12):1644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scope A, Benvenuto-Andrade C, Gill M, Ardigo M, Gonzalez S, Marghoob AA. Reflectance confocal microscopy of molluscum contagiosum. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(1):134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Song M, Kim SH, Jung DS, Ko HC, Kwon KS, Kim MB. Structural correlations between dermoscopic and histopathological features of juvenile xanthogranuloma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25(3):259–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pimenta R, Leal-Filipe P, Oliveira A. Reflectance confocal microscopy for the noninvasive diagnosis of cutaneous juvenile xanthogranuloma. Skin Res Technol. 2019;25(1):106–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lallas A, Giacomel J, Argenziano G, Garcia-Garcia B, Gonzalez-Fernandez D, Zalaudek I, Vazquez-Lopez F. Dermoscopy in general dermatology: practical tips for the clinician. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(3):514–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaballos P, Gomez-Martin I, Martin JM, Banuls J. Dermoscopy of Adnexal Tumors. Dermatol Clin. 2018;36(4):397–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones CD, Ho W, Robertson BF, Gunn E, Morley S. Pilomatrixoma: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2018;40(9):631–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Navarrete-Dechent C, Liopyris K, Rishpon A, Marghoob NG, Cordova M, Dusza SW, Sahu A, Kose K, Oliviero M, Rabinovitz H, et al. Association of Multiple Aggregated Yellow-White Globules With Nonpigmented Basal Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(8):882–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawaguchi M, Suzuki T. Dermoscopy is useful for the diagnosis of milia-like idiopathic calcinosis cutis. Australas J Dermatol. 2018;59(1):63–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bakos RM, Blumetti TP, Roldán-Marín R, Salerni G. Noninvasive imaging tools in the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancers. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(1):3–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Howard RM, Smith GP. Treatment of calcinosis cutis with sodium thiosulfate therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(5):1518–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants in the study. We also thank Dr. Ya Wang and Dr. Biao Zhang from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital for helping with the von Kossa staining.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XMZ consulted with the patient and performed the histopathological evaluation; XYZ performed dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy examinations; XMZ and KY drafted the manuscript; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Standard care was performed, and ethical approval is not applicable to this case report.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for the publication of these data, including clinical photographs, was obtained from the patient's parents.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Zhang, X. & Yang, K. Diagnostic aid to subepidermal calcified nodule with dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy: a case report. BMC Pediatr 23, 102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03913-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03913-6

Keywords