Skip to main content

The prevalence and risk of urinary tract infection in malnourished children: a systematic review and meta-analysis



There are vast differences in prevalence rates of urinary tract infection (UTI) reported among malnourished children globally. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide estimates of pooled prevalence of UTI among these children and combined UTI risk in comparison with their well-nourished counterparts.


We systematically searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science and African Journals Online; date of the last search: 22 December 2018) for studies reporting either the prevalence of UTI in malnourished children or parallel healthy controls. Eligible primary studies were observational studies of children in English Language reporting UTI prevalence with background malnutrition or with enough data to compute these estimates, as well as studies which reported at the same time UTI prevalence in healthy controls. We synthesized published prevalence rates or associations (odds ratios [OR]) between malnutrition and UTI and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effects meta-regression and explored potential heterogeneity determinants using meta-regression analysis. This review is registered with PROSPERO, number- CRD42018084765.


We included 26 cross-sectional and 8 case-control studies reporting on UTI prevalence in malnourished children, and in malnourished children vs. healthy controls, respectively. The pooled prevalence of UTI in 3294 malnourished children was 17% (95% CI, 13, 21%). Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 87.6%; Tau2 = 0.06) as studies varied in their sample size, degree of malnutrition, and study period. Multivariate meta-regression model, including these factors, explained 34.6% of the between-study variance. Pooled OR of UTI in association with malnutrition in 2051 children (1052 malnourished children vs. 999 controls) was 2.34 (95% CI, 1.15, 3.34), with lower between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 53.6%; Tau2 = 0.47).


UTI is more prevalent in malnourished children than in their well-nourished counterparts. Screening and treatment for UTI should be incorporated in the management protocol of malnourished children to improve disease outcomes.

Peer Review reports


Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) in children constitutes a global health challenge in developing countries of sub-Saharan Africa and southern Asia [1]. Children with PEM have immunological dysregulation [2] and are thus susceptible to common childhood infections such as infectious diarrhea, pneumonia and bacteremia which, in turn, create a vicious cycle with malnutrition [3]. Similarly, these children are also thought to be mainly predisposed to urinary tract infection (UTI) as the infection risk may also increase with the severity of malnutrition [4], although there appears to be inconsistent evidence linking the degree of malnutrition to higher risk of UTI [5].

The presence of urinary secretory IgA (sIgA) is one of the defense mechanisms against UTI, and its role in UTI episodes has been reported [6,7,8]. Low urinary sIgA may represent an important predisposing factor to recurrent UTI [9]. Among other effects on the immune system, malnutrition specifically leads to diminished IgA response. A study on experimental animal models showed that dietary protein played a significant and site-specific role in the developmental expression of the secretory immune system, with severe protein malnutrition suppressing this immune arm [10]. Therefore, UTI risk in malnourished children may partly be related to impaired sIgA response.

Several studies have been conducted on UTI prevalence rates and bacterial etiologic patterns in malnourished children across the globe [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. A 2013 systematic review of severely malnourished under-five children revealed a high prevalence of pneumonia (34%), diarrhea (35%) UTI (24%) and bacteremia (17%), with higher mortality rates compared to other children [20]. Furthermore, a more recent non-systematic review revealed vast differences in the prevalence rates with no regional disparities regarding the bacterial isolates, even though sensitivity patterns varied remarkably [5]. There was also no consensus on sex predominance of UTI among malnourished children in some of these studies [11, 12, 18], and controversy still exists on whether UTI risk in these children increases with the severity of malnutrition given the discordant reports about this correlation. Although few studies have compared UTI prevalence in malnourished vs. healthy children, there have been no pooled risk studies directly quantifying the risk of UTI due to malnutrition [21].

We, therefore, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide estimates of pooled UTI prevalence among malnourished children and of combined UTI risk in comparison with their well-nourished counterparts without age limits and including all degrees of malnutrition. These combined data should provide sufficiently robust evidence to justify the inclusion of screening and treatment of UTI in the management of children with PEM.


Search strategy and selection criteria

We systematically searched electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and African Journals Online from inception till 2018 (date of the last search: 22 December 2018). We searched both databases using the following keywords alone and in combination: urinary tract infection, bacteriuria, pyuria, malnutrition, protein-energy malnutrition, severe acute malnutrition, prevalence, incidence, risk, children and infants.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

To be included in this review, primary studies had to be observational studies of children (irrespective of origin, ethnic, socioeconomic, and educational background) reporting the prevalence of UTI with background malnutrition or with enough data to compute these estimates. We also included studies which reported an association between malnutrition and UTI or at least UTI prevalence in both malnourished and comparative healthy controls in the same research, enabling the estimation of associations. Both malnutrition and UTI had to be clearly defined in the included studies. Malnutrition had to be defined as a function of weight for age or weight for height using validated reference methods including the World health Organization (WHO)/National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) [22], Wellcome [23], or Gomez [24] classifications or as mid-arm circumference less than 11 cm. The grade or degree of malnutrition also had to be clearly defined. When absent, we categorized grade I as mild malnutrition, grade II as moderate malnutrition, and grade III as severe malnutrition. UTI had to be defined as significant bacteriuria or pyuria corresponding to the urine sampling method. We included only full-text articles in the English language. We excluded abstracts, letters, reviews, commentaries, editorials, and studies without primary data or explicit description of methods. Two of the investigators (SNU and ICE) independently screened the titles and abstracts of articles retrieved from the literature search. Full texts of articles found potentially eligible were obtained and further assessed for final inclusion. All duplicates were removed during the study selection process. Disagreements were resolved through discussions between the investigators until a consensus was reached.

Quality assessment

We evaluated the methodological quality of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessing non-randomized studies [25]. This scale evaluates case-control and cross-sectional studies using criteria categorized into selection (4 points), comparability (2 points), and exposure/outcome (3 points). Quality Rating was categorized as low (< 7) or high (≥7). Two of the investigators (SNU and ICE) independently assessed study quality, with disagreements resolved by consensus.

Data extraction

Two of the investigators (SNU and ICE) independently extracted relevant data from individual studies using a preconceived and standardized data-extraction form. Information retrieved included the first author’s name, year of publication, year of study, study setting and country, study design, study population, sample size, and age and sex distribution of participants. We extracted information on urine sampling and analytic methods, UTI and malnutrition diagnostic criteria, the proportion of participants with UTI, and the reported population subgroup differences in proportions. We also extracted information on bacterial isolates and their antibiotic-sensitivity patterns when available. Where relevant data were not available, we contacted the corresponding author to request for the information. We assessed the inter-rater agreement for study inclusion and data extraction using Cohen’s κ coefficient [26].

Data analysis

A meta-analysis of prevalence studies

The synthesized study-specific estimates were pooled using random effects meta-regression model to obtain an overall summary estimate of the prevalence across studies, after stabilizing the variance of individual studies with the use of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation [27]. Random-effect models give more weight to smaller studies and have wider confidence intervals because they consider potential variation between the actual effects that all included studies estimate, in addition to their within-study variance. We calculated the I2 and tau2 to assess between-study heterogeneity. We assessed publication bias using funnel plots and the formal Egger [28], and Begg’s tests [29]. We considered any test p-values less than 0·05 to be indicative of significant publication bias. We assessed subgroup differences in prevalence estimates based on factors such as sex (males/females), age group (< 18 months/≥18 months), malnutrition severity (moderate or severe /mild or mixed), region of origin (Africa/Others), study design (cross-sectional/ case-control), study quality (low/high), year of study (< 2000/≥2000) and urine-collection method (one method/multiple methods or unspecified). We performed sensitivity analyses, including fixed effect meta-regression, leave-one-out random effects meta-regression to explore the stability of our pooled prevalence estimate. We assessed the sensitivity of the combined estimates to the exclusion of studies with < 30 participants, and studies where urine sampling method, urinalysis method or definition of UTI were not stated. We performed meta-regression analysis using study-level covariates as predictors of study-level estimates to explore the determinants of potential heterogeneity in our pooled estimates, in bivariate and multivariate models.

A meta-analysis of association studies

We pooled the reported or derived estimates of association (odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI) between malnutrition and UTI from included case-control studies also using random effects meta-regression model. When no UTI was reported for the control group, we added 0.5 to all four related groups to estimate the OR and 95% CI in the affected studies [30, 31]. We also calculated the I2 and tau2 to assess between-study heterogeneity and evaluated publication bias using funnel plots and the formal Egger [28], and Begg’s tests [29]. We performed subgroup analysis, including stratification by matching (i.e., if the studies matched the Cases and Controls by at least age or sex, or both). We also performed sensitivity analyses, including fixed-effect and leave-one-out meta-regression. Given the limited number of association studies (n = 8), we could not perform further meta-regression analyses. Data were analyzed using STATA version 14.0 for Windows (STATA Corporation, Texas).

For reporting, we adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis [32], and the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines [33]. This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO, number- CRD42018084765.


Study selection

We identified 1478 records following a combined search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and African Journals Online databases. Exclusion of duplicates and non-pertinent articles yielded 35 articles, of which 33 met the eligibility criteria. A further search of the references of these articles yielded an additional item. Thus, the present review includes 34 full-text articles, either reporting UTI in malnourished children only or parallel with well-nourished children. Details of the article-selection algorithm are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Algorithm for inclusion in the present study

Characteristics of included articles

Overall, we included 26 cross-sectional (76%) and 8 case-control studies (24%). All included studies were hospital-based studies. Most of the studies were from African countries including South Africa [13,14,15, 34,35,36] Nigeria [11, 37,38,39,40], Uganda [41, 42], Kenya [17, 43] Tanzania [18, 44], Ethiopia [16] Niger [12], Sudan [45], and Gambia [19]. Other studies were conducted in Turkey [46, 47], India [4, 48, 49], Pakistan [50, 51], Bangladesh [52], Thailand [53], Iran [54], Australia [55], Peru [56], and Jamaica [57]. Sample size varied, with 18% of the studies having < 50 participants. Eight cross-sectional studies (31%) primarily investigated UTI in malnourished children [13, 14, 17, 18, 35, 46, 53, 57], whereas the remaining 18 studies (69%) reported UTI as a secondary outcome in the broader context of bacterial infections in malnourished children [11, 12, 15, 16, 19, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45, 50,51,52, 55]. Most of the case-control studies (88%) primarily investigated UTI occurrence in malnourished children vs. healthy controls [4, 34, 47,48,49, 54, 56], whereas one (12%) reported UTI prevalence in both groups in the broader context of bacterial infections in children [36]. The pooled study population included 3294 malnourished children from 26 cross-sectional studies and 2051 children (1052 malnourished and 999 controls) from the 8 case-control studies, for estimating the pooled prevalence of UTI and pooled OR and 95%CI of UTI with malnutrition, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of studies on malnutrition and urinary tract infection

Most of the studies included participants who had moderate-to-severe malnutrition (76%), while the rest had mixed malnourished populations (24%). There were differences in urine-sampling methods with most studies employing two or multiple methods (74%) including combinations of suprapubic aspiration, mid-stream urine or urine bags [4, 16, 18, 34,35,36, 38,39,40, 48, 49, 52, 53, 57], compared to a single method (26%) in their study population [11,12,13, 17, 43, 47, 54, 56] (Table 2). There was uniformity in the definition of UTI across studies, which was consistently applied to the urine-sampling method (Table 2). Although all studies examined the prevalence of UTI in malnourished children, 38% of the included studies did not explicitly describe urine-collection method, urine analytic method, or UTI (Table 2).

Table 2 Definition of malnutrition and urinary tract infections across included studies

UTI prevalence in malnourished children

As shown in Fig. 2, the pooled random-effects prevalence of UTI in 3294 malnourished children was 17% (95% CI: 13, 21%). Heterogeneity was high across studies (I2 = 87.6%; P < 0.001; Tau2 = 0.06). Subgroup analyses showed significant differences by degree of malnutrition (severe: 15% (95% CI: 11, 19%); mild/mixed: 25% (95% CI: 19, 32%); Pheterogeneity: 0.01) and sample size (Sample size < 50: 27% (95% CI: 18, 36%); Sample size ≥50: 16% (95% CI: 12, 20%); Pheterogeneity: 0.02), and borderline-significant differences by year of study (year < 2000: 21% (95% CI:16,26%); year≥2000: 14% (95% CI: 9, 19%); Pheterogeneity: 0.06). We did not observe significant differences by age group (Pheterogeneity: 0.21), study region (Pheterogeneity: 0.68) and study quality (Pheterogeneity: 0.33). Although the difference by urine sampling method was non-significant (Pheterogeneity: 0.29), the prevalence of UTI in studies which applied suprapubic aspiration or sterile catheterization alone was 14% (95% CI: 7, 22%) while that of those combining different methods was 18% (95% CI: 14, 23%). Sex-specific prevalence of UTI in malnourished children was similar among the six studies reporting these estimates (UTI prevalence in males: 23% (95% CI: 14, 32%); females: 20% (95% CI: 14, 27%); Pheterogeneity = 0.61) (Table 3). Figure 3 shows the funnel plot for visualization of publication bias. We observed minimal evidence for publication bias as both Egger’s (P = 0.15) and Begg’s tests (P = 0.35) were non-significant. Further sensitivity analyses revealed the robustness of our findings. Fixed-effects prevalence of UTI in malnourished children was 15% (95% CI: 14, 17%) (Fig. 2) whereas exclusion of studies with <30 participants or not specifying urine sampling or analytic method or UTI definition yielded a random-effects pooled prevalence of 17% (95% CI: 13, 21%) and 20% (95% CI, 14, 27%) respectively (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Fig. 2

Overall UTI prevalence in malnourished children

Table 3 Subgroup random-effects prevalence estimates of urinary tract infection in malnourished children
Fig. 3

Funnel plot for visualization of publication bias with studies reporting UTI prevalence

Results from meta-regression analyses including study-level covariates showed the degree of malnutrition, sample size and year of study to be significant predictors of prevalence rates, explaining 24.1, 5.8 and 5.7% of the between-study variance respectively in the bivariate models, respectively. Degree of malnutrition remained significant in the multivariate meta-regression model that also included sample size and year of study. Studies, including severely-malnourished children, reported a lower prevalence of UTI compared to a milder/mixed group (OR: 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.97)). Although statistically non-significant, prevalence of UTI also decreased with sample size (OR: 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.02)) and studies published from 2000 (OR: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.02)). This multivariate meta-regression model explained 33.9% of the between-study variance in the pooled estimates (Table 4).

Table 4 Meta-regression estimates to explain the prevalence of urinary tract infection in malnourished children

Risk of UTI in malnourished children vs. healthy controls

Random-effects pooled OR of UTI in 1052 malnourished children, and 999 controls were 2.80 (95% CI: 1.41, 5.54). We observed moderate heterogeneity in across studies (I2 = 53.6%; P = 0.04; Tau2 = 0.47) (Fig. 4). Stratifying by matching criterion showed differences in random effects associations between UTI and malnutrition (OR matched studies: 5.67 (1.39, 23.2); I2 = 56.7%; P = 0.07; Tau2 = 1.09; OR in unmatched studies: 2.04 (0.91, 4.57); I2 = 57.4%; P = 0.07; Tau2 = 0.38). Figure 5 shows the funnel plot for visual assessment of publication bias within the case-control studies. We also observed minimal evidence for publication bias given the non-significant Egger’s (P = 0.34) and Begg’s tests (P = 0.90). Sensitivity analyses revealed robust effect estimates. Fixed effect pooled OR of UTI was 2.50 (95% CI: 1.66, 3.89) (Fig. 3). Leave-one-out random effects OR of UTI ranged from 2.34 (1.19, 4.62) to 3.26 (1.63, 6.50). We observed the smallest heterogeneity (I2 = 47.2%; P = 0.08; Tau2 = 0.41) on the exclusion of the study by Banapurmath and Jayamony [48].

Fig. 4

Meta-analysis of overall UTI prevalence rate

Fig. 5

Funnel plot for visualization of publication bias with the case-control studies

Bacterial isolates and antibiotic-sensitivity patterns

Urine culture was performed by 28 (82%) of the included studies. Of the 27 studies that reported urinary bacterial isolates, Escherichia coli was the predominant isolate in 25 (93%) of them, whereas Klebsiella spp. was predominant in 2 (7%). Most common bacterial strains included gram negative coliforms, including Escherichia coli (100%), Klebsiella spp. (81%), Proteus spp. (41%), Pseudomonas spp. (33%), Enterobacter spp. (22%), and Citrobacter spp. (15%). Other reported gram-negative bacterial isolates include Salmonella spp. (7%), Serratia spp. (7%), Hafnia alvei (4%) and Morganella morganii (4%). Gram-positive isolates were less prevalent and included Staphylococcus spp. (7%), Enterococcus spp. (7%), and Streptococcus faecalis (4%) as well as the fungus, Candida albicans (4%). Antibiotic sensitivity tests were performed by 13 (38%) studies, with different sensitivity patterns (Table 5).

Table 5 Prevalence of urinary tract infections (UTI) and bacterial isolates in malnourished children across included studies

Comorbidities of UTI in malnourished children

The most commonly reported morbidities in malnourished children were diarrhea or gastroenteritis (53%; n = 18) [12, 15, 16, 37,38,39, 41, 42, 44,45,46, 48, 50, 52,53,54,55,56], respiratory diseases (including pneumonia, tuberculosis, respiratory tract infection and abnormal chest radiographs; 47%; n = 16) [12, 16, 19, 37,38,39, 41, 42, 45, 46, 48, 50, 52,53,54,55] and bacteremia or sepsis (47%; n = 16) [12, 14,15,16,17, 19, 37,38,39, 41,42,43,44, 50, 52, 53]. Six studies reported co-occurrence of UTI with at least one of these common malnutrition-associated morbidities [12, 14, 19, 39, 48, 54]. Only 27% (n = 7) of the cross-sectional studies on UTI in malnourished patients investigated renal urinary tract malformations in their UTI patients [4, 36, 48, 49, 54, 56], reporting a combined malformation prevalence of 14% in these patients. In contrast, 75% (n = 6) of the case-control studies utilized radiological investigations to identify malformations as a risk factor for UTI in their patients, reporting a prevalence of 34% (n = 80) among the malnourished children and a prevalence of 4% (n = 4) among the healthy controls.


This paper is the first PROSPERO-registered systematic review on UTI among malnourished children. In this review and meta-analysis of data from 34 studies involving 3294 malnourished children, we found a pooled UTI prevalence of 17% and pooled OR of 2.34 for UTI in association with malnutrition in 2051 children (1052 malnourished children versus 999 controls). Our combined prevalence rate is at variance with the rate of 24.1% reported in a systematic review on the justification for antibiotic use in children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM) [20]. The disparity could be due to differences in the number of reviewed studies (26 in the current study versus 10 in the comparative study), and may also be explained by the predominant age bracket of the malnourished children reviewed by these authors [20], which fell within the period of pre-toilet/toilet training: a phase that contributes to UTI risk in childhood [21]. The systematic review by Alcoba et al. specifically selected studies that investigated the prevalence of other infections, such as human immunodeficiency virus, bacteremia, lower respiratory tract infection, and diarrhea in strictly SAM and not-only-SAM children [20]. However, the prevalence rate from our review is similar to the 11–16.5% prevalence reported in the selected studies from the West African sub-region [11, 12, 19, 38, 39], India [4, 49], Turkey [47], and Australia [55].

We found no significant sex predominance in the few studies that reported a sex-specific prevalence of UTI in malnutrition. This finding is inconsistent with the known epidemiologic trajectory of UTI in which prevalence rates for both sexes may be the same during infancy, but show male predominance in the neonatal period and female preponderance during early childhood and the period of toilet training [5]. More importantly, the later female dominance may be due to anatomical differences where the proximity of the urethral opening to the vagina may facilitate urethral contamination [58]. In addition, recent evidence suggests that the sex differences in the reticuloendothelial system which provides innate immunity against microbes may also contribute to the sex differences in UTI prevalence rates [59]. Thus, irrespective of nutritional status, female sex remains a risk factor for UTI in childhood. We also noted that UTI risk was increased by the severity of malnutrition. Its prevalence was slightly higher in children aged less than 18 months. Although the latter observation may be related to exposure to gut uropathogenic bacterial flora during the period of pre-toilet training, the former agrees with the report of one of the selected studies which showed a direct correlation of UTI risk with the severity of malnutrition [4]. It is however in contrast with the findings of studies in Nigeria [11], and South Africa [14], which did not establish any significant change in UTI prevalence rates for the different grades of malnutrition. The lower prevalence of UTI in the severely malnourished children may be related to their lower efficiency in immune response due to lack of immune cells and immune dysfunction which characterize severe malnutrition [60]. Although non-significant, the higher prevalence of UTI in studies combining several sampling techniques (that included less sterile methods) might have been due to contamination in the collection process. But the allowance of up to 105 colonies per ml in the diagnosis of UTI (when the reference method of suprapubic aspiration is not used) limits outcome misclassification, and could explain the non-significant difference observed in our study.

Our finding of a positive and significant pooled risk of UTI in malnourished children compared to healthy control is not surprising given their higher susceptibility to infections based on their immune dysregulation. We also found a consistent report of higher occurrence of other infections across studies which investigated other concurrent infections. Malnourished children also had higher prevalence of urinary tract anomalies, which is a known risk factor for UTI [61].

Another key finding in our systematic review is the predominance of Escherichia coli and other gram-negative coliforms as the bacterial isolates. This trend is similar in both malnourished and non-malnourished children. It is trite to mention that exposure of children to infection with gut uropathogens (during pre-toilet and toilet-training periods) is a putative UTI risk factor, which may partly explain this observation. Apart from the role of malnutrition in causing diminished IgA response (including sIgA), the reduced transferrin levels in malnourished children may result in the circulation of free unbound iron, which creates a favorable environment for the growth of gram-negative bacteria leading to gram-negative sepsis and subsequently UTI via the hematogenous route [5].

There are substantial differences in the antibiotic-sensitivity patterns of the predominantly isolated gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli. Our observation across the reviewed studies clearly shows no defined pattern of sensitivity and resistance to the tested antibiotics. This finding underscores the need for a periodic institution-based update of antibiotic-sensitivity trends. Relying on previous sensitivity reports as guides for empirical therapy may result in poor outcomes for new cases of UTI in malnourished children.

The strengths of our study include its broad approach in identifying relevant articles, and the consideration of both UTI prevalence in malnourished children, and the risk of UTI in malnourished children vs. controls. We explored publication bias, and the determinants of high heterogeneity observed in our estimates. Our inclusion of a large number of studies also allowed for sensitivity analyses, which confirmed the robustness of our pooled estimates. However, our research has some limitations. First, we observed high heterogeneity across the studies included in the combined prevalence estimates. While we identified some factors that explained some of the between-study heterogeneity, other unmeasured factors could have also contributed as we could only explain 34.6% of this heterogeneity. The inclusion of earlier studies may have biased our pooled estimates given the continuous updates of definitions and management protocols for childhood diseases. However, the definition of UTI and other methodologies were quite similar across included studies, and although stratification by year of publication showed higher prevalence of UTI among older studies (before 2000; pooled prevalence of 21%), the prevalence of newer studies (2000 and later; pooled prevalence of 14%) was similar to the overall pooled random effects estimate (17%). Year of publication was also not a significant determinant of between-study heterogeneity in the meta-regression model (Table 4). Our observation of the absence of publication bias in the pooled OR of UTI might have been due to the small number of studies, as there is a high risk of non-detection of publication bias in meta-analyses that include less than ten publications [62].

In conclusion, our systematic review has shown that UTI is more prevalent in malnourished children than in their well-nourished counterparts. It has been suggested that if children at high risk of UTI like those with malnutrition were screened, the number of children missed or treated inappropriately could be reduced [63]. We recommend the incorporation of screening and treatment for UTI into the management protocol for malnourished children to improve disease outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).



Confidence interval


Odds ratio


Protein-energy malnutrition


Severe acute malnutrition


Secretory immunoglobulin A


Urinary tract infection


  1. 1.

    Kramer CV, Allen S. Malnutrition in developing countries. Paed Child Health (United Kingdom). 2015;25:422–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Iyer SS, Chatraw JH, Tan WG, et al. Protein-energy malnutrition impairs homeostatic proliferation of memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol. 2012;188:77–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Schlaudecker EP, Steinhoff MC, Moore SR. Interactions of diarrhea, pneumonia, and malnutrition in childhood: recent evidence from developing countries. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bagga A, Tripathi P, Jatana V, et al. Bacteriuria and urinary tract infections in malnourished children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18:366–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Uwaezuoke SN. The prevalence of urinary tract infection in children with severe acute malnutrition: a narrative review. Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics. 2016;7:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Deo SS, Vaidya AK. Elevated levels of secretory immunoglobulin a (sIgA) in urinary tract infections. Indian J Pediatr. 2004;71:37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    James-Ellison MY, Roberts R, Verrier-Jones K, Williams JD, Topley N. Mucosal immunity in the urinary tract: changes in sIgA, FSC, and total IgA with age and in urinary tract infection. Clin Nephrol. 1997;48:69–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fliedner M, Mehls O, Rauterberg EW, Ritz E. Urinary sIgA in children with urinary tract infection. J Pediatr. 1986;109:416–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Riedasch G, Heck P, Rauterberg E, Ritz E. Does low urinary sIgA predispose to urinary tract infection? Kidney Int. 1983;23:759–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sullivan DA, Vaerman JP, Soo C. Influence of severe protein malnutrition on rat lacrimal, salivary and gastrointestinal immune expression during development, adulthood, and aging. Immunology. 1993;78:308–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rabasa AI, Shattima D. Urinary tract infection in severely malnourished children at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital. J Trop Pediatr. 2002;48:359–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Page A-L, de Rekeneire N, Sayadi S, et al. Infections in children admitted with complicated severe acute malnutrition in Niger. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e68699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kala UK, Jacobs DW. Evaluation of urinary tract infection in malnourished black children. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1992;12:75–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Reed RP, Wegerhoff FO. Urinary tract infection in malnourished rural African children. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1995;15:21–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Berkowitz FE. Infections in children with severe protein-energy malnutrition. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1983;3:79–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shimeles D, Lulseged S. Clinical profile and pattern of infection in Ethiopian children with severe protein-energy malnutrition. East Afr Med J. 1994;71:264–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Thuo N, Ohuma E, Karisa J, Talbert A, Berkley JA, Maitland K. The prognostic value of dipstick urinalysis in children admitted to hospital with severe malnutrition. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:422–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ahmed M, Moremi N, Mirambo MM, et al. Multi-drug gram-negative enteric bacteria causing urinary tract infection among malnourished under-fives admitted at a tertiary hospital, northwestern Tanzania. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41:44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Okomo UA, Garba D, Fombah AE, et al. Bacterial isolates and antibiotic sensitivity among Gambian children with severe acute malnutrition. Int J Pediatr. 2011;2011:825123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Alcoba G, Kerac M, Breysse S, et al. Do children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition need antibiotics? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e53184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Laway MA, Wani ML, Patnaik R, et al. Does circumcision alter the peri-urethral uropathogenic bacterial flora? Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2012;9(2):109–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    World Health Organization. Management of severe malnutrition: a manual for physicians and other senior health workers. In: WHO, editor. Management of severe malnutrition 1999 edition. Geneva: WHO; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wellcome Trust Working Party. Classification of infantile malnutrition. Lancet. 1970;2:302–3.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gomez F, Galvan RR, Cravioto J, Frenk S (1955). Advances Paediat., Vol VII, The Year Book Publishers, Inc., Chicago, Illinois.

  25. 25.

    Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2000.

  26. 26.

    Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Barendregt JJ, Doi SA, Lee YY, et al. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:974–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT (2010). Statistical algorithms in Review Manager 5. Retrieved from http://ims.cochrmethods-in-revman-5.pdf.

  31. 31.

    Pagano M, Gauvreau K (2000). Principles of biostatistics. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

  32. 32.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Buchanan N. A deep-slide test for bacteriuria in protein-calorie malnutrition. South Afr Med J. 1971:320–1.

  35. 35.

    Buchanan N, Fairburn JA, Schmaman A. Urinary tract infection and secretory urinary IgA in malnutrition. South Afr Med J. 1973;47:1179–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Jeena PM, Coovadia HM, Adhikari M. A prospective study of bacteriuria and pyuria in catheter specimens from hospitalized children, Durban. South Africa Ann Trop Paediatr. 1995;15:153–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ekanem EE, Umotong AB, Raykundalia C, Catty D. Serum C-reactive protein and C3 complement protein levels in severely malnourished Nigerian children with and without bacterial infections. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86:1317–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ighogboja IS, Okuonghae HO. Infections in severely malnourished children. Nig Med Pract. 1993;26(3):27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Oyedeji GA. The pattern of infections in children with severe protein-energy malnutrition. Nig J Paediatr. 1989;16(3 & 4):55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Morton RE, Lawande R. Frequency and clinical features of urinary tract infection in pediatric out-patients in Nigeria. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1982;2:113–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Philips I, Wharton B. Acute bacterial infection in kwashiorkor and marasmus. Brit Med J. 1968;1:407–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bachou H, Tylleskär T, Downing R, Tumwine JK. Severe malnutrition with and without HIV-1 infection in hospitalized children in Kampala, Uganda: differences in clinical features, hematological findings, and CD4+ cell counts. Nutr J. 2006;5(1):27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Noorani N, Macharia WM, Oyatsi D, Revathi G. Bacterial isolates in severely malnourished children at Kenyatta National Hospital Nairobi. East Afr Med J. 2005;82(7):343–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Isaack H, Mbise RL, Hirji KF. Nosocomial bacterial infections among children with severe protein-energy malnutrition. East Afr Med J. 1992;69(8):433–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Suliman OS, Salih MA, Karrar ZA, Mohammed AO, Helsing C. Infection and immunoglobulin levels in Sudanese children with severe protein-energy malnutrition. Sudan J Paediatr. 2011;11(2):32–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Caksen H, Arslan S, Cesur Y, Sar S, Celebi V, Kuru M. Urinary tract infection and antibiotic susceptibility in malnourished children. Int Urol Nephrol. 2000;32(2):245–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Caksen H, Arslan S, Abuhandan M, Celik A, Bozkurt H, Odabas D. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in infants in eastern Turkey. Acta Paediatr Tw. 2001;42(6):338–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Banapurmath CR, Jayamony S. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in severely malnourished preschool children. Indian Pediatr. 1994;31(6):679–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gopal G, Premalatha R. Effect of malnutrition on kidney size and incidence of urinary tract infection in malnourished children. Int J Pharm Biomed Res. 2014;5(1):29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Sameen I, Moorani KN. Morbidity patterns of severely malnourished children at tertiary care hospital. Pak Paediatr J. 2014;38(1):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Anjum M, Moorani KN, Sameen I, Mustafa MA, Kulsoom S. Functional and structural abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract in severely malnourished children - a hospital-based study. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(5):1135–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Brown KH, Gilman RH, Gaffar A, et al. Infections associated with severe protein-calorie malnutrition in hospitalized infants and children. Nutr Res. 1981;1:33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Morehead CD, Morehead M, Allen DM, Olson RE. Bacterial infections in malnourished children. Environmental Child Health. 1974:141–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Bodaghi E, Sadre M, Ziai M. Bacteriuria in malnourished Iranian children. J Trop Pediatr Environ Child Health. 1978:77–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Russell BJ, White AV, Newbury J, Hattch C, Thurley J, Chang AB. Evaluation of hospitalization for indigenous children with malnutrition living in Central Australia. Aust J Rural Health. 2004;12:187–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Freyre EA, Rondόn O, Bedoya J, Llerena M, Tamayo M. The incidence of bacteriuria and pyuria in Peruvian children with malnutrition. J Pediatr. 1973;83(1):57–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Brooke OG, Keer DS. The importance of routine urine culture in malnourished children. J Trop Pediatr Environ Child Health. 1973;19:348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ingersoll MA, Albert ML. From infection to immunotherapy: host immune responses to bacteria at the bladder mucosa. Mucosal Immunol. 2013;6:1041–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Abelson B, Sun D, Que L, Nebel RA, Baker D, Popiel P, et al. Sex differences in lower urinary tract biology and physiology. Biol Sex Differ. 2018;9(1):45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Bourke CD, Berkley JA, Prendergast AJ. Immune dysfunction as a cause and consequence of malnutrition. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(6):386–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ring E, Zobel G. Urinary infection and malformations of urinary tract in infancy. Arch Dis Child. 1988;63(7):818–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kontopantelis E, Springate DA, Reeves D. A re-analysis of the Cochrane library data: the dangers of unobserved heterogeneity in meta-analyses. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    World Health Organization. Urinary tract infections in infants and children in developing countries in the context of IMCI. WHO/FCH/CAH/05.11.

Download references


Not applicable



Author information




SNU conceived the study and, together with IKN and ICE, designed the protocol. SNU, IKN, and ICE conducted the literature search. SNU and ICE selected the studies and extracted the relevant information. ICE synthesized and analyzed the data. All the authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and approved its final version.

Authors’ information

SNU is an Associate Professor of Pediatrics with the University of Nigeria and Honorary Consultant Pediatrician with the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu. ICE is a Research Fellow with the Chronic Disease Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel. IKN is a Consultant Pediatrician with the Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel N. Uwaezuoke.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Study quality scores based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies. Table S2. Sensitivity analyses of UTI prevalence in malnourished children and association of UTI and malnutrition in malnourished children and healthy controls. Table S3. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses of random-effects prevalence of urinary tract infection in malnourished children. Table S4. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses of random-effects association between malnutrition and urinary tract infection in children. (DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uwaezuoke, S.N., Ndu, I.K. & Eze, I.C. The prevalence and risk of urinary tract infection in malnourished children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 19, 261 (2019).

Download citation


  • Urinary tract infection
  • Pooled prevalence
  • Risk
  • Malnutrition
  • Children