Skip to main content
Download PDF

The association of dietary carbohydrate quality and quantity with obesity among Iranian adolescents: a case-control study

BMC Pediatrics volume 24, Article number: 176 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Adolescent obesity is considered as a major health concern worldwide which is closely linked to the quality of diet. The purpose of the present study was to assess the carbohydrate quality and quantity in relation to odds of overweight and obesity in adolescents.

Methods

This case-control study with a 1:1 ratio was conducted on 406 adolescents (14 to 18 years old) matched for age and gender. Participants were selected by multistage cluster random sampling method from March to October 2019 in Shiraz, Iran. Dietary intakes of the study population were assessed by a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Also anthropometric indices were measured using standard methods and demographic information was recorded via face to face interview. The relation between low carbohydrate diet score (LCDS) and carbohydrate quality index (CQI), and odds of obesity was evaluated by multiple Logistic regression.

Results

After adjusting the role of potential confounders, the participants in the third tertiles of LCDS (OR = 0.443, 95% CI = (0.260 to 0.755)) and CQI (OR = 0.005, 95% CI = (0.001 to 0.025)) had less odds of being overweight and obese compared to the first tertile.

Conclusion

The present study found an inverse relationship between dietary quantity and quality of carbohydrate intake and the odds of overweight and obesity in a sample of Iranian adolescents.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Adolescent obesity, which is closely associated with adulthood obesity, is a health concern in the world [1], and its prevalence was estimated equal to 5.8% in Iranian students [2]. Obesity is linked with higher risk of health issues such as hypertension, and type two diabetes [3], as well as psychological ramification including stigmatization and peer victimization [4].

Various approaches have been suggested to prevent and treat adolescent obesity, including dietary interventions with different ratios of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats [5,6,7]. Among these patterns, low carbohydrate diets have emerged as a popular approach, which could promote weight loss and improve metabolic outcomes [8, 9]. However, the link among total intake of carbohydrate and obesity risk remains inconclusive. A meta-analysis study found no relationship between higher carbohydrate intake and obesity risk [10], while some others have conflicting results [11, 12]. Moreover, limited research exists regarding the association of low carbohydrate diet score (LCDS) and adolescent obesity [13].

Most studies on carbohydrate intake and obesity have independently assessed various aspects of carbohydrate quality, such as fiber consumption [14], glycemic index (GI) [15], and load (GL) [16], sugar-sweetened beverages [17], and whole grains [18]. But, the relationship between these individual components and obesity has remained controversial. Carbohydrate Quality Index (CQI) is a valuable measure of carbohydrate quality which encompasses multiple individual components, including GI, dietary fiber intake, the proportion of whole to total cereals and the solid to total carbohydrates ratio [19].

The link between CQI with obesity risk and some chronic diseases in adults has been previously evaluated [19,20,21]. Also, there have been researches on the association between adolescent obesity with dietary pattern and carbohydrate intake quantity [22,23,24]. However, few studies have been conducted to investigate the connection between CQI and LCDS with obesity in adolescents. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to assess the relationship between quality and quantity of carbohydrate intake with overweight and obesity in adolescents.

Materials and methods

Study design

The current case-control study with a 1:1 ratio (normal weight: overweight or obese) was done on 406 adolescents from March to October 2019, according to the guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences approved all procedures of the present study (No.IR.SUMS.REC.1398.1310). All participants were informed about the study protocol then written consents were signed.

Participants

Inclusion criteria were 14–18 years old healthy adolescents. Overweight or obese adolescents (BMI > 85th percentile) were considered as the case group and normal weight adolescents (BMI between 3th and 85th percentile) as the control group. Exclusion criteria were as follows: adolescents who were diagnosed with a disease affecting their nutritional status such as diabetes, cancer, renal failure, liver disease, rheumatic and skeletal disease, or following a dietary regimen that may affect body weight such as, vegetarian, low calorie or high calorie diets.

Participants were selected using multistage cluster random sampling method and matched for age and sex. As school systems are separated based on gender (male schools and female schools) in Iran, we considered 2 stratums for the sampling: educational district and gender. In each of the four educational districts, four high schools were selected using systematic random sampling. Then within each school, classrooms were selected using a simple random sampling method followed by students’ selection using systematic random sampling. The number of students selected in every district was proportionate to the entire population of that district. Also, in the control group, participant’s selection were done from the same classroom which was expected to be in the same social context as the case group.

Participants’ characteristics

Demographic information including age, sex, school grade, housing ownership, birth order, parents’ education, and family income were recorded via face to face interview. Physical activity was assessed by international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) based on metabolic equivalent rate by hours per week (MET/h/W) [25].

Dietary intakes

Dietary intakes of the study participants were assessed using a validated 147-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) [26]. Frequency of the food items were reported as daily, weekly, monthly and yearly. Then, the frequency was changed to gram by multiplying portion size of food item by frequency with household measurement guidelines for Iranian population. Finally, daily dietary energy and macronutrients intakes were estimated using Nutritionist IV software [27].

Anthropometric assessment

A digital scale (Omron, China) was used for weight measurement in light clothing. Also, non-elastic tape was used for height assessment. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height in meters squared (m2).

The NCHS/CDC (2000) cut-off points were used to determine overweight and obesity. Based on BMI-for-sex and –age, below the 85th, between the 85th and 95th, and above the 95th percentile were defined as normal weight, overweight and obese respectively [28]. Also, for the waist circumference (WC) assessment an un-stretchable tape measure was used.

Exposure measurement

To obtain CQI four criteria were computed: total intake of fiber (g/day), proportion of whole to total cereals (refined and whole cereals), glycemic index (GI), and proportion of solid to total carbohydrate intake (solid and liquid). Fruit juice and sugar-sweetened beverages were summed up to calculate liquid carbohydrates and the rest of carbohydrate content was considered for solid carbohydrates. Each of these four criteria got a score from 1 to 5. Finally, the range of CQI was among 4 to 20. The higher points mean more closely to CQI [29].

LCDS was calculated as follows: participants were allocated in to 11 classes for each components (carbohydrates, plant proteins, refined cereals, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs and PUFAs), GL and fibers). In groups of vegetable proteins, MUFAs, PUFAs and fibers, individuals received 10 points for the last stratum and 9 points for the next stratum and so on, the first stratum received 0. However, for carbohydrates, GL and refined grains, the scoring method was reversed (the first stratum received 10 points and the last one received 0). The total points were summed up and the range was from 0 (minimum consumption of protein and fat and maximum consumption of carbohydrate) to 70 (minimum intake of carbohydrate and maximum intake of protein and fat). The higher points mean more closely to LCDS [30, 31].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were done by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS software; ver. 23). Normal distribution of the variables was checked by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The values have been shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percent. To compare the variables between control and case groups, independent sample t-test and Chi-square were applied. Also, for comparison the categorical and continuous variables between CQI and LCDS tertiles one way ANOVA was used. The logistic regression in two crude and adjusted models were used to assess the relationship between LCDS and CQI with overweight and obesity. Also, we adjusted the role of potential confounders in the last model.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Data 406 adolescents were included to the analysis (203 cases and 203 controls). BMI, WC, GI, dietary intakes of energy, carbohydrate, protein and fats were significantly upper (P = 0.001 for all), but, GL was significantly lower in the case group in comparison to the control group (P = 0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of the study participants
Full size table

As shown in Table 2, participants with higher LCDS had greater intake of dietary fibers (g/day) and MUFAs (% energy). On the other hand, BMI, WC, GI and GL scores, energy, carbohydrate, refined grain intakes were significantly lower in the last tertile of LCDS in comparison to the first one.

Table 2 Characteristics of the study participants based on LCDS tertiles
Full size table

Regarding CQI, BMI, WC, energy intake, dietary proteins, fats, liquid CHO and GI were lower in the third tertile comparing the first one (P < 0.001). However, dietary whole cereals, total cereals and solid CHO were higher in the participants in the last tertile (Table 3).

Table 3 Characteristics of the study participants based on CQI tertiles
Full size table

After adjusting the role of potential confounders in the last model, a reverse association were seen between LCDS (OR = 0.443, 95% CI = (0.260 to 0.755)) and CQI (OR = 0.005, 95% CI = (0.001 to 0.025)) with overweight and obesity risk in the last tertile compared to the first one (Table 4).

Table 4 Relation of overweight and obesity with LCDS and CQI in the study population
Full size table

Discussion

The current study assessed the link between LCDS and CQI with overweight and obesity risk in adolescents. The findings showed significant relationships between CQI as well as LCDS with obesity both before and after adjustment for potential confounders.

Our findings indicated that as CQI improves both general and abdominal obesity decreases. These results are consistent with some previous reports [19, 20, 32] while few studies did not find similar associations [33]. Findings of a cross-sectional research on the association of metabolic syndrome in adults with habitual and meal specific CQI showed no significant relationship between CQI and weight (27). Nonetheless, two other cross-sectional studies on 277 women in Ghana [19] and 12,027 adult participants, consisting both men and women, in South Korea [32], along with a cohort study with a follow up of 7.9 years involving 8741 adults found inverse association of CQI with BMI and WC [20]. Individual components of CQI, such as higher intake of fibers, whole grains [34, 35], and solid carbohydrates also low intake of liquid carbohydrates [36], could help lower the risk of obesity and overweight.

Additionally, this study revealed a link between LCDS and general and abdominal obesity. In this regard, other studies have reported conflicting findings [10, 11, 37, 38]. Opposite to our results, a meta-analysis of 22 articles showed no significant association between high carbohydrate diet and obesity. However, the review did mention that non-standardized dietary records, heterogeneity across studies, and lack of quantification of different carbohydrate classes in some studies were of important limitations [10]. In another study involving adult women, no significant relationship was found between weight and LCDS. This lack of association might be due to the fact that the most women had normal BMI and waist circumferences. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in energy intake among the tertiles [39].

In support of our results a cross-sectional study on women in Sri Lanka showed positive correlation between high carbohydrate intake and WC [37]. A study in Korea demonstrated an independent association of white rice and sweets pattern with obesity while low carbohydrate patterns had not significant association [40].

The relationship between CQI and obesity can be explained through promoting satiety, slowing nutrients absorption, influencing gut hormones secretions and supporting gut microbiome. Diets with a high CQI also have high fiber contents, which help reduce weight. Fibers can be helpful in weight reduction by improving satiety, suppressing appetite, reducing food intake, and enhancing insulin sensitivity [41, 42]. Whole grains are also another component of CQI whose consumption prevents weight gain by prolonging intestinal transit time, increasing energy expenditure, and improving satiety and insulin sensitivity [43]. Another component of CQI connected to obesity is the solid to total carbohydrate ratio. Liquid carbohydrates are often rich in sugar and have a high GI. These beverages could raise the risk of obesity through a variety of mechanisms, including impaired glucose homeostasis, increased appetite and insulin resistance [36, 44].

A plausible explanation supporting the relation between LCDS and weight is that low-carbohydrate diets may lower calorie consumption physiologically by stimulating energy expenditure via gluconeogenesis. By reduction of insulin concentration, it leads to usage of fat storage and consequently weight loss [45]. Further, low carbohydrate diets stimulate weight reduction by reducing food intake due to decreased levels of ghrelin and leptin hormones [46, 47]. Increased production of ketone bodies as induces by LCD ghrelin levels tend to decrease [48]. Low carbohydrate diets can enhance leptin sensitivity which leads to reduced appetite and increased satiety [49]. Besides, low GL diets improve satiety by decreasing voluntary food intake and consequently total calorie consumption [50, 51].

This study provides a valuable contribution to the field, however several limitations must be noted. By narrowing down the study to adolescents’ age and considering both quantity and quality of carbohydrate, the research provide a more targeted and contextualized findings. A limitation for our study was administering the questionnaire retroactively. This may limit information recall and lead to under or over reporting of intakes. Furthermore, despite the fact that certain possible confounders were adjusted when analyzing, the impacts of eating habits, psychological and sociocultural status, and genetic variants were not considered in this research.

Conclusion

The present study found a reverse relationship between CQI and LDCS with overweigh and obesity risk in adolescents. The findings give critical information that may benefit planning in the prevention and management of obesity in children and adolescents. Larger studies with more participants from various regions and nations, as well as well-designed clinical trials, should be done to better clarify this association.

Data availability

and methods: To protect study participant privacy, data cannot be shared openly, but data are available through a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Sanyaolu A, Okorie C, Qi X, Locke J, Rehman S. Childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: a public health concern. Global Pediatr Health. 2019;6:2333794X19891305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khazaei S, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A, Nooraliey P, Keshvari-Delavar M, Ghafari M, Pourmoghaddas A, Ayubi E, Mansori K, Gholamaliee B, Sarrafzadegan N. The prevalence of obesity among school-aged children and youth aged 6–18 years in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. ARYA Atherosclerosis. 2017;13(1):35–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sahoo K, Sahoo B, Choudhury AK, Sofi NY, Kumar R, Bhadoria AS. Childhood obesity: causes and consequences. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(2):187–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Vander Wal JS, Mitchell ER. Psychological complications of pediatric obesity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011;58(6):1393–401. x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wycherley TP, Moran LJ, Clifton PM, Noakes M, Brinkworth GD. Effects of energy-restricted high-protein, low-fat compared with standard-protein, low-fat diets: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(6):1281–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross AC, Caballero B, Cousins RJ, Tucker KL. Modern nutrition in health and disease. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2020.

  7. Steinbeck KS, Lister NB, Gow ML, Baur LA. Treatment of adolescent obesity. Nat Reviews Endocrinol. 2018;14(6):331–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sondike SB, Copperman N, Jacobson MS. Effects of a low-carbohydrate diet on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor in overweight adolescents. J Pediatr. 2003;142(3):253–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chawla S, Tessarolo Silva F, Amaral Medeiros S, Mekary RA, Radenkovic D. The effect of low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets on weight loss and lipid levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2020;12(12):3774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sartorius K, Sartorius B, Madiba TE, Stefan C. Does high-carbohydrate intake lead to increased risk of obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Merchant AT, Vatanparast H, Barlas S, Dehghan M, Shah SMA, De Koning L, Steck SE. Carbohydrate Intake and overweight and obesity among healthy adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(7):1165–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Youssef MM, Mohsen MA, Abou El-Soud N, Kazem Y. Energy intake, diet composition among low social class overweight and obese Egyptian adolescents. J Am Sci. 2010;6(9):160–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eslamian G, Mirmiran P, Asghari G, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Yuzbashian E, Azizi F. Low carbohydrate diet score does not predict metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Arch Iran Med. 2014;17(6):417–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brauchla M, Juan W, Story J, Kranz S. Sources of dietary fiber and the association of fiber intake with childhood obesity risk (in 2–18 year olds) and diabetes risk of adolescents 12–18 year olds: NHANES 2003–2006. Journal of nutrition and metabolism 2012, 2012.

  15. Ludwig DS. Dietary glycemic index and obesity. J Nutr. 2000;130(2):280S–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rouhani MH, Kelishadi R, Hashemipour M, Esmaillzadeh A, Azadbakht L. Glycemic index, glycemic load and childhood obesity: a systematic review. Adv Biomedical Res 2014, 3.

  17. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després J-P, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2477–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sadeghi O, Sadeghian M, Rahmani S, Maleki V, Larijani B, Esmaillzadeh A. Whole-grain consumption does not affect obesity measures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(2):280–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Suara SB, Siassi F, Saaka M, Foroshani AR, Sotoudeh G. Association between Carbohydrate Quality Index and general and abdominal obesity in women: a cross-sectional study from Ghana. BMJ open. 2019;9(12):e033038.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Santiago S, Zazpe I, Bes-Rastrollo M, Sánchez-Tainta A, Sayón-Orea C, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Benito S, Martínez JA, Martínez-González MÁ. Carbohydrate quality, weight change and incident obesity in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN Project. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(3):297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Janbozorgi N, Djafarian K, Mohammadpour S, Abyane MZ, Zameni M, Badeli M, Akbarzade Z, Clark CC, Shab-Bidar S. Association between carbohydrate quality index and general and central obesity in adults: a population-based study in Iran. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2021;13(4):298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan R, Chan D, Lau W, Lo D, Li L, Woo J. A cross-sectional study to examine the Association between Dietary Patterns and risk of overweight and obesity in Hong Kong Chinese adolescents aged 10–12 years. J Am Coll Nutr. 2014;33(6):450–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoare JK, Jebeile H, Garnett SP, Lister NB. Novel dietary interventions for adolescents with obesity: a narrative review. Pediatr Obes. 2021;16(9):e12798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jebeile H, Grunseit AM, Thomas M, Kelly T, Garnett SP, Gow ML. Low-carbohydrate interventions for adolescent obesity: nutritional adequacy and guidance for clinical practice. Clin Obes. 2020;10(4):e12370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guidelines for Data. Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) - Short Form. 2004.

  26. Esfahani FH, Asghari G, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Reproducibility and relative validity of food group intake in a food frequency questionnaire developed for the Tehran lipid and glucose study. J Epidemiol. 2010;20(2):150–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nutritionist I. N-squared computing. Silverton: Nutritionist IV 1998.

  28. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):242–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zazpe I, Sanchez-Tainta A, Santiago S, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Bes-Rastrollo M, Martínez JA. Martínez-González MÁJBjon: Association between dietary carbohydrate intake quality and micronutrient intake adequacy in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN (Seguimiento Universidad De Navarra) Project. 2014, 111(11):2000–9.

  30. Halton TL, Willett WC, Liu S, Manson JE, Albert CM, Rexrode K, Hu FBJNEJM. Low-carbohydrate-diet score and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. 2006, 355(19):1991–2002.

  31. Askarpour M, Ramezan M, Jafari F, Nouri M, Fattahi MR, Safarpour AR, Zarghani SS, Ghalandari H, Abdolahi N, Akbarzadeh M. The association between low carbohydrate diet and odds of metabolic syndrome in adults: a cross-sectional study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023;55:238–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim DY, Kim SH, Lim H. Association between dietary carbohydrate quality and the prevalence of obesity and hypertension. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018;31(5):587–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Majdi M, Imani H, Bazshahi E, Hosseini F, Djafarian K, Lesani A, Akbarzade Z, Shab-Bidar S. Habitual- and meal-specific Carbohydrate Quality Index and their relation to metabolic syndrome in a sample of Iranian adults. Front Nutr 2022, 9.

  34. O’Neil CE, Zanovec M, Cho SS, Nicklas TA. Whole grain and fiber consumption are associated with lower body weight measures in US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004. Nutr Res. 2010;30(12):815–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McKeown NM, Yoshida M, Shea MK, Jacques PF, Lichtenstein AH, Rogers G, Booth SL, Saltzman E. Whole-grain intake and cereal fiber are associated with lower abdominal adiposity in older adults. J Nutr. 2009;139(10):1950–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pan A, Hu FB. Effects of carbohydrates on satiety: differences between liquid and solid food. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metabolic Care. 2011;14(4):385–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rathnayake KM, Roopasingam T, Dibley MJ. High carbohydrate diet and physical inactivity associated with central obesity among premenopausal housewives in Sri Lanka. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Song S, Lee JE, Song WO, Paik H-Y, Song Y. Carbohydrate Intake and Refined-Grain Consumption are Associated with metabolic syndrome in the Korean Adult Population. J Acad Nutr Dietetics. 2014;114(1):54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jafari-Maram S, Daneshzad E, Brett NR, Bellissimo N, Azadbakht L. Association of low-carbohydrate diet score with overweight, obesity and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a cross-sectional study in Iranian women. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2019;11(3):216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim J, Jo I, Joung H. A Rice-based traditional Dietary Pattern is Associated with obesity in Korean adults. J Acad Nutr Dietetics. 2012;112(2):246–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pereira MA, Ludwig DS, DIETARY FIBER AND BODY-WEIGHT REGULATION. Observations and mechanisms. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48(4):969–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Weickert MO, Mohlig M, Schöfl C, Arafat AM, Otto Br, Viehoff H, Koebnick C, Kohl A, Spranger J, Pfeiffer AF. Cereal fiber improves whole-body insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese women. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(4):775–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu WC, Inui A, Chen CY. Weight loss induced by whole grain-rich diet is through a gut microbiota-independent mechanism. World J Diabetes. 2020;11(2):26–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Harrington S. The role of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in adolescent obesity: a review of the literature. J School Nurs. 2008;24(1):3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Krieger JW, Sitren HS, Daniels MJ, Langkamp-Henken B. Effects of variation in protein and carbohydrate intake on body mass and composition during energy restriction: a meta-regression. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(2):260–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sánchez J, Cladera MM, Llopis M, Palou A, Picó C. The different satiating capacity of CHO and fats can be mediated by different effects on leptin and ghrelin systems. Behav Brain Res. 2010;213(2):183–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Klein GL, Wong JMW, Bielak L, Steltz SK, Luoto PK, Wolfe RR, Wong WW, Ludwig DS. Effects of a low carbohydrate diet on energy expenditure during weight loss maintenance: randomized trial. BMJ. 2018;363:k4583.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Stubbs BJ, Cox PJ, Evans RD, Cyranka M, Clarke K, de Wet H. A ketone ester drink lowers human ghrelin and appetite. Obesity. 2018;26(2):269–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Barrios-Correa AA, Estrada JA, Contreras I. Leptin Signaling in the control of metabolism and appetite: lessons from Animal models. J Mol Neurosci. 2018;66(3):390–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Vatansever-Ozen S, Tiryaki-Sonmez G, Bugdayci G, Ozen G. The effects of exercise on food intake and hunger: relationship with acylated ghrelin and leptin. J Sports Sci Med. 2011;10(2):283–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Chang KT, Lampe JW, Schwarz Y, Breymeyer KL, Noar KA, Song X, Neuhouser ML. Low glycemic load experimental Diet more satiating Than High Glycemic load Diet. Nutr Cancer. 2012;64(5):666–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Shabnam Mohebati, Mohammad Jalali, Mehran Nouri & Shiva Faghih

  2. Endoocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

    Mahboobeh Shakeri

  3. Department of Nutritional sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

    Sara Ranjbar

  4. Nutrition and Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Jalali

  5. Non-Communicable Pediatric Diseases Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Mehran Nouri

Authors
  1. Shabnam Mohebati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mahboobeh Shakeri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Ranjbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohammad Jalali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mehran Nouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shiva Faghih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.M, M.S, S.R, M.J and M.N; Contributed to writing the first draft. M.N; Contributed to all data, statistical analysis, and interpretation of data. S.F.; Contributed to the research concept, supervised the work, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiva Faghih.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR.SUMS.SCHEANUT.REC.1398.1310), and informed consent was obtained from all the participants and from the parents of the participants who were below 16 years of age.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohebati, S., Shakeri, M., Ranjbar, S. et al. The association of dietary carbohydrate quality and quantity with obesity among Iranian adolescents: a case-control study. BMC Pediatr 24, 176 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04671-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04671-9

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us