Skip to main content
Download PDF

Factors influencing C-reactive protein status on admission in neonates after birth

BMC Pediatrics volume 24, Article number: 89 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To explore the factors influencing C-reactive protein (CRP) status in neonates on admission after birth.

Methods

820 newborns born and hospitalized at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from Jan. 2020 to Dec. 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Maternal medical history and medication use during pregnancy, neonatal demographic information and status at birth were collected through the electronic medical record system. Statistical software was used to analyze the possible relationship between perinatal factors and CRP on admission after birth.

Results

A total of 820 neonates were analyzed, including 463 males and 357 females with a mean gestational age (GA) of 36.07 ± 3.30 weeks. (1) Multifactor Logistic regression analysis: larger GA (OR: 1.13, 95%CI: 1.00-1.28, P = 0.042), premature rupture of membranes (PROM) ≥ 18 h (OR: 2.39, 95%CI: 1.35–4.23, P = 0.003) and maternal autoimmune diseases (OR: 5.30, 95%CI: 2.15–13.07, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. Cesarean delivery (OR 0.40, 95%CI: 0.26–0.60, P < 0.001) was independent protective factor for CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. (2) Threshold effect analysis: A non-linear relationship was found between GA and CRP. When GA is less than 33.9 weeks, the risk of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L was reduced by 28% with one week increased (P < 0.001), and when GA is more than 33.9 weeks, the risk of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L was increased by 61% with one week increased (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

GA, PROM, maternal autoimmune diseases and cesarean delivery were all independent influences neonatal CRP ≥ 8 mg/L on admission, and there was a nonlinear relationship between GA and neonatal CRP ≥ 8 mg/L on admission.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the inflammatory response has been confirmed, and its level is closely related to the health status of the human body [1]. It is significantly increased in emergencies such as bacterial infections, inflammation, tissue damage, malignant tumors [1]. Serum CRP is well recognized as one of the major biomarkers for the diagnosis of early onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) [2].

Neonatal sepsis is the third major cause of neonatal death and disability in the first month after birth [3]. The incidence of neonatal sepsis varies by different country and income. In the United States and China, the incidence of EOS is approximately 0.8–1.1/1000 live births and 22/1000 live births, respectively [4, 5]. In economically underdeveloped regions, EOS can account for an estimated 30 to 50% of all neonatal deaths each year [6].. Blood culture is the gold standard for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, but its long testing period and atypical symptoms in early neonates make early diagnosis of EOS difficult [7]. Therefore, CRP, procalcitonin (PCT) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are more informative for the early diagnosis of neonatal EOS. High CRP status is indicative of severe bacterial infections and is associated with an increased risk of EOS [2, 8,9,10]. Salih et al. reported [9] that when CRP is ≥ 8 mg/L, it can be used as one of the reference factors for diagnosing positive blood cultures. Gomathi et al. found [11] that CRP measured within 6 h of the onset of clinical sepsis signs had sensitivity 83%and negative predictive value (NPV) 82.3% in diagnosing neonatal sepsis. After considered the presence of neonatal sepsis, neonates often receive antibiotics for more than 3 days. However, when CRP is used to diagnose neonatal infectious diseases, its specificity is not high [12, 13]. There are multiple other pathological situations, aside from infections, associated with an increase in CRP. Nuntnarumit et al. reported [14] that CRP is indicative for the diagnosis of EOS, leading to prolonged antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) usually due to high CRP status. This inevitably leads to overuse of antibiotics, resulting in the development and spread of antibiotic resistance [15] and other adverse outcomes such as neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) [16]. And excessive antibiotic therapy increases the risk of abnormal bacterial colonization, increase in resistant bacteria, and allergic manifestations [16, 17].

Previous descriptive studies on the linear and nonlinear relationships between influencing factors and CRP status are rare, and the lack of quantification of the ability of influencing factors to affect CRP status has led to the inability to estimate the magnitude of the effect, even though it is known that certain factors have an effect on CRP status. This research intends to explore the possible relationship between influencing factors and CRP status, quantify the magnitude of influence of influencing factors on CRP status through regression analysis, and attempt to explore whether there is a nonlinear relationship influence of certain factors, which will help physicians to better assess the risk of infections in neonates, administer antimicrobial drugs in a timely manner, and also avoid overuse of antibiotic drugs.

Materials and methods

Research Population

This was retrospective cross-sectional research of 872 neonates born at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between Jan. 2020 and Dec. 2020 and admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit within 2 h of birth. The CRP status of all the above neonates were measured on admission. 40 neonates had to be excluded because of incomplete data; 4 neonates had to be excluded because of positive blood culture; 6 neonates had to be excluded because of combined with congenital developmental malformation, 2 neonates had to be excluded because of died within 48 h after admission. All clinical, perinatal, neonatal and laboratory data were cross-checked for accuracy. A final total of 820 neonates were enrolled, and the neonates were categorized into two groups based on whether or not they had a CRP value of ≥ 8 mg/L: the CRP ≥ 8 mg/L group (163 cases, 98 males, 65 females, mean GA 37.71 ± 3.51 weeks) and the CRP < 8 mg/L group (657 cases, 365 males, 292 females, mean GA 35.66 ± 3.11 weeks).

Determination of CRP

CRP status were measured by immunoturbidimetric assay (CRP kit, Beckman Coulter, USA) and IM-MAGE800 fully automated special protein analysis system (Beckman Coulter, USA). The cut-off values of CRP were 8 mg/L [18, 19].

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University and has been carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) of the World Medical Association. Written informed consent to participate in this research was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin. (Ethics Review Department No. 202307164).

Statistical analysis

If the continuous variable was normally distributed, it was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were expressed in frequency or as a percentage. χ 2 (categorical variables), Student’s t-test (normal distribution), or Mann–Whitney U-test (skewed distribution) were utilized to analyze differences between CRP ≥ 8 mg/L group and CRP<8 mg/L group.

Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression were used to analyze the possible association between gestation age, PROM, antenatal steroids, maternal autoimmune diseases, delivery mode, MAS and the incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. Two models were constructed to illustrate the stability of this relationship: Model 1 adjust for: sex, gestational age, birth weight; Model 2 adjust for: sex, GA, birth weight (BW), maternal fever, placenta previa, antenatal antibiotic use, PROM, pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes, ICP, MAS, antenatal steroids, maternal autoimmune diseases. To address non-linearity of gestation age and the incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L, a generalized additive model and smooth curve fitting (penalized spline method) were conducted. After non-linearity was detected, we first calculated the inflection point using a recursive algorithm and then constructed a two-piecewise logistic regression on both sides of the inflection point. We determined the best fit model based on the P-values for the log likelihood ratio test. All the analyses were performed with the statistical software packages R (version 3.6.1) (http://www.R-project.org, The R Foundation) and EmpowerStats (http://www.empowerstats.com, X&Y Solutions, Inc, Boston, MA). P-values < 0.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant.

Results

Comparison of baseline characteristics

We presented the basic characteristics of the two groups in Table 1. We found statistical differences in gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), premature rupture of membrane (PROM) (≥ 18 h), antenatal steroids, placenta previa, maternal autoimmune diseases, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), delivery mode (Cesarean delivery), and meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) between the two groups. GA and BW in CRP ≥ 8 mg/L group were significantly larger than that in CRP<8 mg/L group. The incidence rate of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L was significantly higher when neonates exposed to PROM(≥ 18 h), maternal autoimmune diseases and MAS; and significantly lower when newborns exposed to antenatal steroids, placenta previa, ICP and cesarean delivery. (Table 1)

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the CRP ≥ 8 mg/L group compared with the CRP<8 group.[Mean ± SD, n (%)]
Full size table

Univariate analysis

The results of the univariate analysis were demonstrated in Table 2. Through univariate logistic regression, we found that GA and BW were positively associated with CRP ≥ 8 mg/L, the risk of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L increased by 26% for one week increase in GA (P < 0.001);Antenatal steroids, placenta previa, and delivery mode(Cesarean delivery) were negatively associated with CRP ≥ 8 mg/L, with a 53%,82% and 69% reduction in the risk of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L respectively (All P < 0.01); PROM (≥ 18 h), maternal autoimmune diseases and MAS were positively associated with CRP ≥ 8 mg/L, with an increased risk of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L by 77%, 367% and 387%, respectively (All P < 0.05). (Table 2)

Table 2 Univariate analysis for incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L [n = 820, Mean ± SD, n (%)]
Full size table

The relationship between GA/PROM/antenatal steroids/maternal autoimmune diseases/delivery mode/MAS and incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L

To further investigate the association of GA, PROM, antenatal steroids, maternal autoimmune diseases, delivery mode and MAS with CRP ≥ 8 mg/L, we used the multivariate logistic regression analysis method. By stepwise inclusion of covariates (sex, GA, BW, maternal fever, placenta previa, antenatal antibiotic use, PROM, pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes, ICP, MAS, antenatal steroids, maternal autoimmune diseases.), we separately established two models to illustrate the stability of these associations. Our results showed that larger GA (OR 1.13,95%CI: 1.00-1.28, P = 0.042), PROM(≥ 18 h) (OR 2.39,95%CI: 1.35–4.23, P = 0.003) and maternal autoimmune diseases (OR 5.30,95%CI: 2.15–13.07, P < 0.001) had a significant association with CRP ≥ 8 mg/L, and these relationships were stable even when we adjusted for confounding factors in Table 2. Indicated that GA, PROM (≥ 18 h) and maternal autoimmune diseases were independent risk factors for CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. The risk of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L increased with the increasing GA. That is for every one-week increase in the GA, there was a 13% increased risk for CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. At the same time, cesarean delivery (OR 0.40, 95%CI: 0.26–0.60, P < 0.001) had a significantly negative correlation with CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. (Table 3)

Table 3 The relationship between perinatal factors and incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L in different models
Full size table

The non-linear relationship between GA and incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L

In the present research, we analyzed the non-linear relationship between gestational age and incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L (Fig. 1). A smooth curve and the result of generalized additive model show that the relationship between GA and incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L was non-linear after adjusting for maternal fever, placenta previa, antenatal antibiotic use, PROM, pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes, ICP, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, antenatal steroids, maternal autoimmune diseases.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Non-linear relationship between gestational age and incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. Result variable: incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. Exposure: gestational age. Adjust for maternal fever, placenta previa, antenatal antibiotic use, PROM, pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes, ICP, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, prenatal dexamethasone use, maternal autoimmune diseases

Full size image

We used both logistic regression and two-piecewise logistic regression to fit the association and select the best fit model based on P-values for the log likelihood ratio test. Because the P-values for the log likelihood ratio test were less than 0.05, we chose two-piecewise logistic regression for fitting the association between gestational age and incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L because it could accurately represent the relationship (Table 4). By two-piecewise logistic regression and a recursive algorithm, we calculated the inflection point to be 33.9 weeks. On the left side of the inflection point, the effect size and 95%CI were 0.72, 0.61–0.85, respectively. On the right side of the inflection point, the effect size and 95%CI were 1.61, 1.43–1.81, respectively. Which means that from 25 weeks to 33.9 weeks, the risk of incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L was reduced by 28% with one week increased (P < 0.001), and from 33.9weeks to 42 weeks, the risk of incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L was increased by 61% with one week increased. (P < 0.001). (Table 4)

Table 4 Threshold effect analysis of GA and incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L using piece-wise logistic regression
Full size table

Discussion

CRP status is closely related to the health status of the human body. As a non-specific marker of inflammatory response, its status changes during infections, autoimmune diseases, surgeries, cancers and cardiovascular diseases, etc. Different CRP status in the blood reflect different pathological conditions. Such changes can help physicians to enhance their judgment of the disease, which is of great significance in shortening the diagnosis time and preventing and controlling the disease progression at an early stage. We have systematically analyzed perinatal factors at birth that may affect CRP status, quantified the magnitude of the effect of different factors on CRP status, and innovatively found a nonlinear relationship between gestational age and CRP status. These will help physicians in the early judgment of EOS.

Our research found a reduced risk of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L with cesarean delivery compared to vaginal delivery. This may be due to the fact that vaginal delivery is an emergency state for neonates, which can stimulate the body to produce a large number of hormones such as glucocorticoids or catecholamine hormones, thus affecting the function of neutrophils and the production of inflammatory factors, at the same time, vaginal or forceps delivery is easy to cause certain tissue damage to neonates [20]. It was reported that the serum CRP status of healthy neonates born vaginally was significantly higher than that of neonates born by cesarean Sects. [21,22,23]. Therefore, the delivery mode is one of the most important factors affecting serum CRP status in the early postnatal period of neonates.

It was reported that higher CRP levels were found in patients with active serosits [24], arthritis [25], and myositis [26]. And high CRP levels were associated with high cardiometabolic risk and clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients [27]. Our research found that maternal pregnancy with autoimmune disease was an independent risk factor for the increase of serum C-reactive protein within 48 h after birth, and the possible mechanism was related to maternal autoantibodies passing into the placenta and causing tissue damage in the neonates.

Gestational age is also an important factor affecting serum CRP status in the early postnatal period. It was reported that GA had a significantly positive effect on CRP, and compared with healthy term newborns, healthy preterm newborns had a lower and shorter CRP response [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Hofer et al. found that CRP levels of preterm newborns within 72 h after birth were lower than those of full-term newborns in both infected and non-infected states [29]. Our research also found that the risk of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L increased with the increasing GA. And every one-week increase in the GA, there was a 13% increased risk for CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. However gestational age had a non-linear relationship with incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L, By two-piecewise Logistic regression and a recursive algorithm, our further research calculated the inflection point to be 33.9 weeks which means that from 25 weeks to 33.9 weeks, the risk of incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L was reduced by 28% with one week increased (P < 0.001), and from 33.9 weeks to 42 weeks, the risk of incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L was increased by 61% with one week increased.(P < 0.001).This was an interesting phenomenon never reported before to our knowledge. Preterm births were associated with multiple risk factors that are linked with increased oxidative stress [30]. Among individual biomarkers, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), interleukin-10, CRP, and tumor necrosis factor-αwere statistically significant predictors of preterm birth [31]. We reasoned the causes were that when GA was smaller than 33.9 weeks, the smaller the gestational age, the more adverse maternal stress, and the greater possibility of intrauterine infection. When GA was greater than 33.9 weeks, Dimitrios reported [32] that term newborns had a more pronounced CRP response in comparison to preterm newborns when GA was greater than 34 weeks, and the CRP values in 24 and 36 h after birth in term newborns were significantly higher than that in preterm newborns. Our results were agreeable with those reported in the literature.

It was reported that the serum CRP status of full-term neonates with MAS was significantly higher than that of the control group at the early stage after birth [29]. In our univariate analysis research, the incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L in MAS was 4.87 times compared without MAS (P = 0.005). After adjust for sex, GA, BW, maternal fever, placenta previa, antenatal antibiotic use, PROM, pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes, ICP, antenatal steroids, maternal autoimmune diseases and delivery mode, the incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L in MAS was 2.89 times compared without MAS (OR 2.89, 95%CI: 0.90–9.26, P = 0.073), which indicated MAS had a positive correlation on CRP but in this research, it may be limited by the sample size. MAS was a potential independent risk factor for CRP ≥ 8 mg/L. There are two possible mechanisms. First, meconium contamination of amniotic fluid is a marker of fetal maturity, which is commonly seen in full-term newborns, and full-term is an important factor for the increase of serum CRP in the early stage after birth [33]. On the other hand, MAS may occur when amniotic fluid is contaminated by meconium. Meconium can induce chemical inflammation in lung tissue, promote the accumulation and activation of inflammatory cells in alveolar, enhance the expression and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and promote the production of oxygen free radicals, resulting in tissue damage [34].

In summary, we are of the opinion that CRP status must be interpreted in the context of an newborns’ clinical condition and not used alone to guide clinical antibiotic decision making.

Strengths and limitations

Our research has some advantages. (1) We use multiple Logistic regression to quantify the independent factor in influencing CRP; (2) we describe the association between GA and incidence of CRP ≥ 8 mg/L, solve the non-linear problem in this research and further explored this point. (3) Our results show that CRP status within 48 h after birth is affected by many non-infectious factors, and the increase of CRP is not simply caused by infection which could guide us the rational use of antibiotics in clinical practice.

There are some limitations in this research. Our research only included neonates admitted to the NICU and did not assess CRP status in healthy neonates, which may have resulted in some selection bias.

Conclusions

GA, PROM, maternal autoimmune diseases, and cesarean delivery were all independent influences on neonatal CRP ≥ 8 mg/L on admission, and there was a nonlinear relationship between GA and neonatal CRP ≥ 8 mg/L on admission.

Data availability

All data generated for this analysis are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable quest from qualified researchers.

References

  1. Nehring SM, Goyal A, Patel BC, C Reactive Protein. 2022 Jul 18. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan.

  2. Hincu MA, Zonda GI, Stanciu GD, Nemescu D, Paduraru L. Relevance of biomarkers currently in Use or Research for practical diagnosis Approach of neonatal early-onset Sepsis. Child (Basel). 2020;7(12):309.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Siroosbakht S, Aarabi N, Rezakhaniha B. Bathing or not bathing: which is better for Umbilical Cord Separation Time and bacterial colonization in neonates? Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2021;9(2):e104100. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Flannery DD, Puopolo KM. Neonatal early-onset Sepsis. Neoreviews. 2022;23(11):756–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong Y, Basmaci R, Titomanlio L, Sun B, Mercier JC. Neonatal sepsis: within and beyond China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(18):2219–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vijayan S, Nair GAV, Narayanan D. Clinical features and septic screen in neonatal sepsis in a teaching hospital in India. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2020;7:46–51. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ershad M, Mostafa A, Dela Cruz M, Vearrier D. Neonatal Sepsis. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2019;7(3):83–90. 

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Díez-Padrisa N, Bassat Q, Machevo S, Quintó L, Morais L, Nhampossa T, et al. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for invasive bacterial pneumonia diagnosis among children in Mozambique, a malaria-endemic area. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(10):e13226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Salih KM, El-Samani el-F, Bilal JA, Eldouch W, Ibrahim SA. Clinical and laboratory potential predictors of blood culture positivity in under five children with clinically severe pneumonia - Khartoum -Sudan. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(8):C04–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carrol ED, Mankhambo LA, Jeffers G, Parker D, Guiver M, Newland P, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of five markers of serious bacterial infection in Malawian children with signs of severe infection. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(8):e6621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomathi V, Chitrasivasankari G, Uma T, Saravanan MP, Gurumoorthy K. Serial quantification of CRP and total leukocyte count as a complementary tool in neonatal sepsis. Bioinformation. 2022;18(10):920–4. 

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Benitz WE, Han MY, Madan A, Ramachandra P. Serial serum C-reactive protein levels in the diagnosis of neonatal infection. Pediatrics. 1998;102(4):E41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiesa C, Natale F, Pascone R, Osborn JF, Pacifico L, Bonci E, et al. C reactive protein and procalcitonin: reference intervals for preterm and term newborns during the early neonatal period. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(11–12):1053–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nuntnarumit P, Pinkaew O, Kitiwanwanich S. Predictive values of serial C-reactive protein in neonatal sepsis. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002;85(Suppl 4):1151–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Labi AK, Obeng-Nkrumah N, Sunkwa-Mills G, Bediako-Bowan A, Akufo C, Bjerrum S, et al. Antibiotic prescribing in paediatric inpatients in Ghana: a multi-centre point prevalence survey. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen X, Shi Y. Determinants of microbial colonization in the premature gut. Mol Med. 2023;29(1):90. 

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelderer F, Mogren I, Eriksson C, Silfverdal SA, Domellöf M, West CE. Associations between pre- and postnatal antibiotic exposures and early allergic outcomes: a population-based birth cohort study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022;33(9):e13848.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hofer N, Zacharias E, Müller W, Resch B. An update on the use of C-reactive protein in early-onset neonatal sepsis: current insights and new tasks. Neonatology. 2012;102(1):25–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Selim G, Stojceva-Taneva O, Sikole A, Amitov V, Trajcevska L, Asani A, et al. Association between haemoglobin level and all-cause mortality in haemodialysis patients: the link with inflammation and malnutrition. Prilozi. 2007;28(1):81–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vogl SE, Worda C, Egarter C, Bieglmayer C, Szekeres T, Huber J, et al. Mode of delivery is associated with maternal and fetal endocrine stress response. BJOG. 2006;113(4):441–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Perrone S, Lotti F, Longini M, Rossetti A, Bindi I, Bazzini F, et al. C reactive protein in healthy term newborns during the first 48 hours of life. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(2):F163–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bellieni CV, Liuzzo LP, Giomi S, Tei M, Stazzoni G, Bertrando S, et al. C-reactive protein: a marker of neonatal stress? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(6):612–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mjelle AB, Guthe HJT, Reigstad H, Bjørke-Monsen AL, Markestad T. Serum concentrations of C-reactive protein in healthy term-born Norwegian infants 48–72 hours after birth. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108(5):849–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ueki K, Ikeuchi H, Ota F, Yokoo M, Tamura S, Kaneko Y, et al. Extremely high levels of C-reactive protein in patients with acute lupus serositis. Mod Rheumatol. 2002;12(3):267–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ball EM, Gibson DS, Bell AL, Rooney MR. Plasma IL-6 levels correlate with clinical and ultrasound measures of arthritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2014;23(1):46–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Littlejohn E, Marder W, Lewis E, Francis S, Jackish J, McCune WJ, et al. The ratio of erythrocyte sedimentation rate to C-reactive protein is useful in distinguishing infection from flare in systemic lupus erythematosus patients presenting with fever. Lupus. 2018;27(7):1123–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Pesqueda-Cendejas K, Parra-Rojas I, Mora-García PE, Montoya-Buelna M, Ruiz-Ballesteros AI, Meza-Meza MR, et al. CRP Serum Levels Are Associated with High Cardiometabolic Risk and Clinical Disease activity in systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients. J Clin Med. 2022;11(7):1849.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Macallister K, Smith-Collins A, Gillet H, Hamilton L, Davis J. Serial C-Reactive protein measurements in Newborn infants without evidence of early-onset infection. Neonatology. 2019;116(1):85–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hofer N, Müller W, Resch B. Non-infectious conditions and gestational age influence C-reactive protein values in newborns during the first 3 days of life. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(2):297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Phillippe M. Telomeres, oxidative stress, and timing for spontaneous term and preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):148–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pearce BD, Grove J, Bonney EA, Bliwise N, Dudley DJ, Schendel DE, et al. Interrelationship of cytokines, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormones, and psychosocial variables in the prediction of preterm birth. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70(1):40–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rallis D, Balomenou F, Kappatou K, Karantanou K, Tzoufi M, Giapros V. C-reactive protein in infants with no evidence of early-onset sepsis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):5659–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Poggi SH, Ghidini A. Pathophysiology of meconium passage into the amniotic fluid. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(10):607–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. van Ierland Y, de Beaufort AJ. Why does meconium cause meconium aspiration syndrome? Current concepts of MAS pathophysiology. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(10):617–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the research personnel and the research volunteers involved with the project.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81801510, 82071693) and supported by Hunan province Natural Science Foundation of China (2019JJ50930, 2021JJ31046).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neonatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China

    Chuanding Cao, Shuo Wang, Yang Liu, Shaojie Yue, Mingjie Wang, Xiaohe Yu, Ying Ding, Mei Lv, Keren Fang, Meiyan Chu & Zhengchang Liao

Authors
  1. Chuanding Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuo Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shaojie Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mingjie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaohe Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ying Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mei Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Keren Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Meiyan Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhengchang Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZCL, CDC and SW conceived the research. CDC, SJY, MJW, XHY, YD, ML, MYC, YL and KRF collected and reviewed subjects’ data. SW performed statistical analysis. ZCL and CDC drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to its revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengchang Liao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University and has been carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) of the World Medical Association. Written informed consent to participate in this research was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin. (Ethics Review Department No. 202307164).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, C., Wang, S., Liu, Y. et al. Factors influencing C-reactive protein status on admission in neonates after birth. BMC Pediatr 24, 89 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04583-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04583-8

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us