Skip to main content
Download PDF

Analysis of factors influencing the use of child restraint system by parents of children aged 0–6 years: an information, motivation, behavioral skills model-based cross-sectional study

BMC Pediatrics volume 23, Article number: 2 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Children's injuries from traffic accidents have been identified as a global public health issue. Child restraint system (CRS) is a useful tool for lowering the risk of injury to children. Nevertheless, CRS usage is really low in China. The goal of the current study was to investigate the use of CRS after the legislation revised in China and to explore the influencing factors based on Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills model (IMB).

Methods

The study is a cross-sectional survey of parents who took their 0 to 6-year-old children for seeking primary care services at the Children Preventive Health Care Clinic of a tertiary hospital in Shandong Province, China. Parents were invited to complete the self-administered questionnaire between March and June 2022, including their knowledge, motivation, and behavioral skills, use behavior of CRS and socio-demographics. Ordinal logistic regression was used to explore the factors associated with CRS use by using SPSS software (version 26.0).

Results

In total, 442 parents participated in the study; 56.1% (n = 201) of the parents utilized CRS for their child passengers, however only 29.0% used CRS frequently. The result of logistic regression analysis show that parents with junior college (OR = 0.398, 95%CI: 0.185 ~ 0.857), possessing a high family economic status(OR = 0.225, 95%CI: 0.088 ~ 0.578), being trained on children’s unintentional injuries(OR = 0.435,95%CI: 0.272 ~ 0.695), and having high scores on CRS riding mode cognition(OR = 0.476, 95%CI: 0.368 ~ 0.616), CRS type cognition(OR = 0.519, 95%CI: 0.392 ~ 0.689), CRS use motivation(OR = 0.392, 95%CI: 0.295 ~ 0.520) and installation skills(OR = 0.559, 95%CI:0.411 ~ 0.761) were the main factors promoting the usage of CRS.

Conclusions

This study found that the use of CRS can be increased by improving parents' knowledge, motivation and behavior skills and hence related educational programs is necessary for increasing CRS use in China.

Peer Review reports

Background

In recent years, private automobiles have displaced public transportation as children's principal source of transportation [1]. The ever-increasing complexity of the traffic situation on the roadways posed a grave threat to the safety of children [2]. Approximately 10,000 children die annually from traffic-related injuries on Chinese roadways [3], with children aged 0 to 6 years old accounting for 60% of these deaths and riding accounting for 44% of all fatalities [4]. Over the past 10 years, child fatalities without use of the CRS have accounted for a higher proportion of child traffic injury deaths, averaging 43.9% [5]. In addition, studies have shown that infants and children who did not use CRS in vehicles are three times more likely to be injured and up to eight times more likely to die [6]. Due to parental neglect or inappropriate usage of Child Restraint Systems (CRS), the number of children injured while riding in automobiles continued to increase [7].

CRS has the potential to significantly lower infant mortality rates by more than 60% [8]. Most countries in the EU have legislation mandating the use of safety restraints for children traveling in cars, and CRS use rates in these countries have generally reached 90% after the legislation [9], and countries have seen significant decreases in child passenger injuries, such as the United States and Germany, where the number of child road traffic deaths has decreased by about 50%, only 76 children died in cars in Germany in 2011 [10]. However, less than 20% of CRS utilization occurred in China, which was significantly lower than the 90% utilization rate in other countries [11, 12]. In an effort to boost the utilization rate of CRS in China, the newly revised "Law on the Protection of Minors" includes CRS for the first time in national legislation in June 2022 [13]. In addition, the "Guidelines for Development of Chinese Children (2021–2030)" issued by the State Council mandated that CRS will be promoted and implemented in September 2022 [14]. However, CRS legislation has just been put into effect, and no appropriate sanctions have been put in place to enforce its usage. The legislation has to be further improved and publicized. Under the background of the introduction of legislation, the strategies of improving the use of CRS should be explored. Nevertheless, there were few studies on the factors affecting the use of CRS in China [15].

Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills model (IMB), one of the widely used theories for comprehending and assessing health behaviors, contained three components: information, motivation, and behavior skills [16]. Personal and social motivation includes attitude and social support, respectively. Behavioral skills consist of personal objective skills for performing the behavior and a perceived sense of self-efficacy [17]. This model posits that information and motivation influence behaviors directly or indirectly while behavioral skills directly influence behaviors [18]. The usefulness of IMB model has been proven continuously in various fields of medical care [19,20,21]. Figure 1 shows the IMB model framework used in this study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Information motivation behavior skill model of CRS usage behavior

Full size image

Existing research on factors influencing parental behavior in CRS use has focused on demographic base information and parental theoretical perceptions, and there is a lack of research parents' motivation and objective skills of using CRS [22]. Research has shown that incorrectly installed CRS increases the risk of child injury and death in accidents. Since the installation of CRS is mostly done by parents and the installation is difficult, it is a very challenging job for parents. Due to the lack of installation skills, CRS installation errors often occur, which poses a huge threat to children's safety. So it is equally important to understand the objective skills of parents for CRS use [23]. In order to offer a scientific basis for further promoting the use of CRS in China, this study aimed to examine, using the IMB model, the factors that influence parents' usage of CRS for children aged 0 to 6 years.

Methods

Sample size calculation

The sample size was determined by using a single population proportion formula with a 95% confidence level and 5% margin error. The actual sample size for the study was computed by using \(N=\frac{{{Z}^{2}}_{1-\frac{\alpha }{2 }} p(1-p)}{{\delta }^{2}}\), where α = 0.05, Z1-α/2 = 1.96, δ = 0.05, Based on a prevalence of 17.3% [11], including the 20% non-response rate, the minimum sample size was calculated as 264. Finally, 460 questionnaires were distributed in total.

Participant recruitment

The present study is a cross-sectional study with approval by the medical ethics review board (QDU-HEC-2021176). The study was conducted in the Children Preventive Health Care Clinic of a tertiary hospital in Shandong Province, China. Parents who took their children to seek primary care at the Clinic between March and June 2022 were included in the study. All eligible participants who visited the clinic during recruitment were invited to participate in the survey. Inclusion criteria were: (1) Father or mother of children aged 0–6; (2) parents aged ≥ 18 years; and (3) parents owning one or more private vehicles [(Sedan, Sport utility vehicle (SUV), etc.]. Exclusion criteria of parents were: (1) refuse to participate in the research; (2) do not drive a private car to pick up the child; and (3) severe mental illness or cognitive impairment.

Data gathering procedure

Questionnaires were collected by trained investigators in the form of online and offline interviews. The wjx.cn platform was used to distribute the online surveys, and face-to-face interviews with parents were conducted by researchers to collect data offline by using the same questionnaires. The investigator thoroughly explained the contents and precautions of the questionnaire before it was filled out, and asked the respondent to complete any missing information and correct illogical questions on spot. All participants sign the informed consent form. The investigator selected 5% of the completed questionnaires at random for a second inspection, and if there were no errors, two individuals entered the data into the electronic database.

Data collection tools

General information questionnaire

A general informational questionnaire was designed using expert consultation and a review of the literature. There were two sections in the questionnaire: (1) Demographic data on parents' highest level of education, income level, child's gender, age, registered address, home ownership, and unintentional injury training participation experience; and (2) CRS usage status; High frequency use refers to CRS being used over 5 times in an average of 10 rides, low frequency use is defined as CRS being used between 1—5 times, and no use indicates that CRS is not used. [Additional file 1].

IMB model questionnaire

The questionnaire was developed through a literature review, consultation with specialists and in-depth interviews with parents of children aged 0–6. During the literature review, we mainly referred to articles by previous research [24, 25]. There are 5 dimensions and 18 items in the IMB questionnaire. The knowledge related to CRS use consisted of 7 items and were divided into riding mode cognition dimension (internal consistency α = 0.902, 4 items) and type cognition dimension (internal consistency α = 0.789, 3 items), assesses the participants' cognition on the age of CRS use, child seating position and seat type replacement. The motivation dimension (internal consistency α = 0.789, 5 items) assesses participants' personal motivation and authoritative advice on CRS use. The behavioral skills related to CRS use consisted of 8 items and were divided into self-efficacy dimension (internal consistency α = 0.808, 3 items) and installation skills dimension (internal consistency α = 0.756, 3 items). The questionnaire adopts Likert’s 5-point scoring, with 1–5 representing from “Strongly Disagree” to “Completely Agree”. The study examined the reliability of 18-item questionnaire, and indicated that the Cronbach's α for the entire questionnaire was 0.887. Additionally, the study used exploratory variables to confirm the questionnaire's structural validity, with KMO = 0.828 and the Bartlett spherical test value of 2180.8 (P < 0.001). [Additional file 2].

Data analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 was used for all statistical analyses. The normal distribution of continuous variables was assessed by kurtosis and skewness. Means and standard deviation were used to describe measurable data that follow the normal distribution. Categorical variables were described as frequency and percentage, and Chi-square test was used for comparison. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean scores among three or more groups for continuous variables. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to identify the variables affecting parents' use of CRS, with the odds ratios (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) presented. Statistical significance was established when P < 0.05.

Results

Participant characteristics

There were 460 questionnaires distributed in total, and 442 valid questionnaires were returned, with a response rate of 96.1%. Among them, 220 valid questionnaires were collected online and 222 offline. Table 1 displays the demographic details of the parents and their children. In the current study, the majority of respondents was mothers (70.4%); 66.7% of respondents had a college degree or higher. The majority of respondents (77.8%) were registered residents of local city households. Children aged 0–3 accounted for 44.3%, and children aged 4–6 accounted for 55.7%, though, reported they had not participated in the training on child accident injuries. 56.1% of parents used CRS for their children, however only 29.0% of parents Frequently used it. The CRS usage of respondents in different characteristic groups was compared, and the results showed that parental role, educational background, monthly income per capita, family status, house ownership and unintentional injury training participation experience were statistically associated with CRS use(P < 0.05). (Table 1).

Table 1 CRS usage of respondents grouped by different characteristics
Full size table

IMB questionnaire score

In the group with the highest frequency of usage, the scores of IMB dimensions ranked from high to low as follows: CRS use motivation (4.14 ± 0.74), self-efficacy (4.06 ± 0.68), riding mode cognition (3.96 ± 0.87), installation skills (3.73 ± 0.75) and type cognition (3.39 ± 0.80). Except for the use motivation score, which was lower in the high frequency use group than in the low frequency use group, the scores of all other dimensions were higher in the high frequency use group than both the low frequency use group and the non-use group (P < 0.001). The CRS use motivation scores differed significantly from one another (F = 129.739, P < 0.001), which is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 IMB dimension scores of different CRS usage behaviors
Full size table

Analysis of influencing factors of usage behavior of CRS

With independent variables confirmed as being statistically associated with the use of CRS, multiplicity tests should be done for the significance. The results show that there is no multicollinearity between variables (VIF < 10) (Table 3). Then, the research has passed the parallel line test, ordinal analysis was conducted. Table 4 demonstrates the impact of several variables on parental use of CRS. The respondents with junior college education, possessing a high family economic status, being trained on children’s accidental injuries, and scored highly on riding mode cognition, type cognition, CRS use motivation, and installation skills were the factors promoting the use of CRS.

Table 3 Test for multicollinearity between variables
Full size table
Table 4 Logistic regression analysis of factors for frequency of CRS usage
Full size table

Discussion

In the present study, the CRS utilization rate was 56.1%, and the high frequency use rate was 29.0%, both of which are higher than the CRS utilization rate in the country as a whole and in other regions in China [26,27,28]. This may be a result of the state's increased promotion of the benefits of CRS use in recent years [29]. However, the rate is still quite inferior to that in other countries [30]. The primary cause is the early implementation of required measures in other countries to penalize parents who did not use of CRS [31]. This finding acted as a reminder to China's relevant ministries to increase the law's universality and enforceability. Local governments and organizations also need to execute targeted penalties expeditiously to increase the CRS utilization rate.

According to research, families with strong financial standing are more likely to use CRS, which is in line with the findings of previous studies [32]. In order to address the low purchase rate caused by the price, foreign nations provided complimentary safety baskets for infants to assure their safety on the journey home [33]. In China, it is difficult to freely offer CRS to every household with children and a car due to economic concerns [34]. However, by offering discount coupons or low-cost rentals, the pertinent departments can encourage parents to buy and use CRS [35]. Furthermore, parents who have attended training on unintentional child injuries had a high rate of CRS utilization. Because those parents had more opportunities to learn about CRS knowledge [36], which also signifies that they would have greater capacity to prevent riding-related accidents in injuries to children if they possessed a greater amount and reliability of knowledge [37]. The results of the univariate analysis of this study indicated that family status was associated with CRS use. With the liberalization of the "two-child" policy, the number of children in the family increases, and family members may give up using CRS due to the narrow space in the car [38]. Therefore, in addition to educating parents, educating other family members such as grandparents and relatives is also very important. In addition, car and safety seat manufacturers should consider the interior space layout of multi-child families, and how to further optimize the design of safety seats with wide applicability and portability, so that they can play a protective role in the limited car interior space.

The study also indicated that CRS use relevant knowledge, including children's riding mode cognition and CRS type cognition, was an important factor affecting parents' use of CRS, which is in line with the findings of earlier studies [39,40,41]. The likelihood and severity of a child's injury following a vehicle collision will increase if there is not an appropriate and effective restraint in the vehicle [42]. For instance, there will be significant safety risks for kids if parents sit in the back with kids in their arms and put the seat belts on them too early. Parents need to master solid knowledge to choose the right mode of transportation and the type of constraint for their children, rather than only rely on subjective judgment. Therefore, relevant departments must regularly educate parents of young children and widely disseminate pertinent information in order to decrease the incidence of riding-related injuries in kids.

Similar to the work by Li et al. [43], our study found that the use motivation of CRS, including the awareness of the serious injury caused by motor vehicle collisions to children and the parents' cognition of the use CRS benefits, are major influencing factors to promote the use of CRS. Currently, due to rapid development of the internet, information about children's injuries brought on by the improper administration of CRS can be rapidly disseminated online. Parents have a more intuitive understanding of the awareness and severity of children's riding injuries, so that they could take measures to prevent injury [44]. Additionally, the authority suggestion promotes the use of CRS, which is compatible with the research findings by Jin [45]. In Malaysia, a study on the factors influencing parents' decision to use CRS found that 42.7% of parents used CRS as a result of advice from medical professionals and nurses as well as recommendations from friends and family [46]. The possible reasons include: CRS involves a relatively professional field, it needs guidance from experts from different fields. Their guidance may be the basis and motivation to eliminate the obstacles to parents’ CRS using [47]. In addition, CRS research was just recently conducted in China, where CRS is less well known and understood by parents than those in other nations [48]. Therefore, parents in China would be strongly urged to utilize CRS for their children when they receive advise from specialists such as medical personnel and get recommendations from friends and family members nearby [45]. In the future, together with strengthening the education of parents' theoretical knowledge, improving parents' motivation must be particularly stressed.

The current study also shown that CRS was utilized more frequently if parents had greater installation skills. Parents of children in Shantou and Chaozhou kindergartens investigated by Yan et al. [49] received training in restraint systems and behavioral skills had the highest utilization rate and correct use rate of CRS, indicating that the combination of theoretical knowledge and practical operation could produce a better result than that only including knowledge component. This is consistent with the IMB's proposition [18]. Due to the professionalism and sophistication of CRS installation, the safety of children while riding would be gravely compromised if parents were unable to obtain dependable CRS installation skills [50]. Therefore, in addition to introducing information about CRS use, training on pertinent behavior skills of CRS installation, including the installation location and interface type, will be significant to encourage parents' use willingness and behavior of CRS in programs of popular science publicity and health education for parents in the future.

Conclusion

In summary, the study results revealed that parents' cognitive, motivation and behavioral skills of CRS have a significant impact on increasing parents' use of CRS, which provides a direction and theoretical basis for designing more targeted programs to increase the use of CRS in the future. Apart from continuing to strengthen and disseminate relevant laws and regulations, government departments also need to provide financial assistance to parents to reduce the burden of using CRS. In addition, further study needs to focus on knowledge and skill training provided by hospitals, communities, and child care centers. In the meantime, healthcare professionals and experts in various fields should give full play to their guiding role, inspire parents to use CRS, and raise their awareness of safety precautions.

Limitations

There are some limitations to this study. First, the questionnaire design did not consider the psychosocial factors related to the use of CRS and whether the children had experienced traffic injuries in the car. Second, the survey area is the central urban area of Qingdao. The parents had relatively higher education and better family economic conditions. Therefore, the extrapolation of the study findings in economically underdeveloped areas may be limited. In addition, Questionnaires are collected in a combination of online and offline methods. During the online surveys, if the survey respondents have questions, the investigators cannot reply in time; during the offline surveys, the research subjects may be more inclined to choose the good results because the investigators are on-site, which may lead to biased questionnaire results. Another weakness of the study is that behavioral skills were assessed on the basis of parental self-reports rather than observation. This can lead to bias. In the future, observation and interview methods need to be added to better supplement the research results.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CRS:

Child restraint system

IMB:

Information-motivation-behavioral skills model

SPSS:

Statistical package for social science

CI:

Confidence intervals

References

  1. Yousefzade-Chabok S, Azari S, Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati L, Rad EH, Hosseinnia M, Khodadadi-Hassankiadeh N. A study of students’ use of restraint systems in school transportation services in primary and secondary schools in northern Iran: an observational study. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):574.

  2. Jia XY. Innovative Design and Practice of Car Child Safety Seat. Qilu University of Technology. 2020.

  3. Qiu CX, Cai BJ, Cang AG, Zheng CL, Ceng LS, Zhang JJ. Analysis of Differences in Technical Regulations for Child Safety Seat between China and the United States. China standardization. 2020;10(03):168–73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bao CM. Attention on Children’s Car Safety during Schooling Season. World Car. 2019;9(10):88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Motor vehicles in China [http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/04/content_5405841.htm]

  6. Fayard G. Road injury prevention in China: current state and future challenges. J Public Health Policy. 2019;40(3):292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sartin E, Bell TR, McDonald CC, Mirman JH. Assessment of Caregiver-Targeted Interventions for Use of Motor Vehicle Passenger Safety Systems for Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(10):e1914180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Global status report on road safety 2018 [https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2018/en/]

  9. Kendi S, Khemraj UD, Thompson LA. Child Passenger Safety-Not Just for Infants. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(1):108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Durbin DR, Hoffman BD. Child Passenger Safety. Pediatrics. 2018;142(5):e20182460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng X, Li R, Yang H, Yin D, Yin T, Wang L, Chen B. The rate of child restraint system use among children aged under six years in China. Scand J Public Health. 2021;50(8):1192–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. West BA, Yellman MA, Rudd RA. Use of child safety seats and booster seats in the United States: A comparison of parent/caregiver-reported and observed use estimates. J Safety Res. 2021;79:110–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Toy Industry editorial Department. First National Legislation introduction of Application of Child Safety Seat. Toy Industry. 2021;12(07)74.

  14. Zhao Q, Xu JM, Lv J, Chen G, Sun M, Li XH. Chinese Children’s Development Outline and the Five-Year Plan for National Economic Development: Analysis of the Changes in Children’s Healthy Development. Chin J Public Health. 2022;38(06):641–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw KM, West B, Kendi S, Zonfrillo MR, Sauber-Schatz E. Urban and rural child deaths from motor vehicle crashes: United States, 2015–2019. J Pediatr. 2022;250:93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, Harman JJ. An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol. 2006;25(4):462–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abbott L, Graven L, Schluck G, Lemacks J. A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis to Explore Diabetes Self-Care Factors in a Rural Sample. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;10(8):1536.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Misovich SJ, Kimble DL, Malloy TE. Changing AIDS risk behavior: effects of an intervention emphasizing AIDS risk reduction information, motivation, and behavioral skills in a college student population. Health Psychol. 1996;15(2):114–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nkosi S, Rich E, Morojele N. The Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model and Unprotected Sex: Assessing the Model’s Utility and Predictability Among Bar Patrons in Tshwane. South Africa Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51(6):2943–53.

  20. Tuzer H, Gezginci E, Yilmazer T. Effects of Information, Motivation, Behavioral Skills Model on Urinary Incontinence in Men With Overactive Bladder and Urge Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(3):261–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma GX, Zhu L, Lu W, Tan Y, Truehart J, Johnson C, Handorf E, Nguyen MT, Yeh MC, Wang MQ. Examining the Influencing Factors of Chronic Hepatitis B Monitoring Behaviors among Asian Americans: Application of the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(8):4642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perez V, Zidan MA, Sethuraman U. Parental Knowledge of Appropriate Placement of Child Restraint Systems Before and After Educational Intervention in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020;36(1):43–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giannakakos AR, Vladescu JC, Simon R. Teaching installation and use of child passenger safety restraints. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018;51(4):915–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huseth-Zosel AL. Parental perceptions of child placement within vehicles: a focus group study. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2018;25(3):279–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Will KE, Decina LE, Maple EL, Perkins AM. Examining the relative effectiveness of different message framing strategies for child passenger safety: recommendations for increased comprehension and compliance. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;79:170–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cai W, Lei L, Zhou H, Wang Y, Peng J, Jin Y, Deng X. Child restraint system use and its associated factors in Shenzhen. Accid Anal Prev. 2021;160:106321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fu JM. The Application Trend of Child Restraint System in Shantou and the Evaluation of Intervention Effect. Shantou University. 2018.

  28. Chen T, Bachani AM, Li Q. Child restraint use in motor vehicles in Shanghai, China: a multiround cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):e050896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang KH. Safety Seats Protect the Future, Effective Protection on Children’s Safety, and Experts Call for Child Safety Seat to Be Included in the Road Traffic Safety Law. Automobile and Safety. 2022;10(03):52–3.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roynard M, Silverans P, Casteels Y, Lesire P. National roadside survey of child restraint system use in Belgium. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;62:369–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shanthosh J, Rogers K, Lung T, Brown J, Ivers R, Wilson A, Jan S. Effectiveness of child restraint legislation to reduce motor vehicle related serious injuries and fatalities: A national interrupted time series analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;142:105553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu J, Min X, Yang J, Zhou YX, Xu B, Sun Y, et al. Investigation on Application and Cognition of Safety Seat among Parents of Young Children in Yixing. Pract Preventive Med. 2019;26(07):801–4+811.

  33. Eventov-Friedman S, Bar-Oz B, Zisk-Rony RY. Using a safe taxi service to transport newborn babies home from hospital. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(1):57–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen X, Yang J, Peek-Asa C, Chen K, Liu X, Li L. Hospital-based program to increase child safety restraint use among birthing mothers in China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e105100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Alghnam S, Alshehri F, Alnjeidi Z, Al-Saud N, Alqahtani M, Al-Eissa M. The impact of car seat giveaways on compliance among newborns in Saudi Arabia. Public Health. 2022;206:77–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jin Y, Deng X, Ye P, Peng J, Peng J, Lei L, Yu Y, Duan L. The Awareness and Attitude of Parents towards the Legislation of Child Restraint in Two Cities of China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu S, Zhou H, Ma J, Wang C, Chen Z, Chen S, Yang Y, Liu X, Peng J, Duan L, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to child safety restraint in citizens of Shenzhen Municipality, China, and the associations between these factors. Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(1):42–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shi HB: The Structure and Safety Research of Two-way Ride Integrated Child Safety Seat. Hunan University; 2018.

  39. Su HJ, Yu Y, Peng JJ, Li WY, Gao SN, Gao N, et al. Multilayer Linear Model Analysis of Influencing Factors of Child Safety Seat Equipping and Application. Shanghai Preventive Med. 2018;30(11):930–6.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li WY, Gao SN, He LH, Wu MY, Chen ML, Su HJ, et al. Parents’ Cognition and Behavior of Preschool Child Safety Seat in Huangpu District. Shanghai China School Health. 2018;39(06):923–6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Feng JL, Fang L, Lu Y, Teng B. The use of safety seats for children aged 3–6 in a community in Shanghai. Shanghai Preventive Med. 2018;30(11):937–42.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Donner JR, Quinn V, Cheli A, Ottiano C, Lewis C. Give Me a Boost! Pediatric Car Safety Seat Program. R I Med J (2013). 2022;105(3):67–9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li WY, Yu Y, Gao SN, He LH, Wang YJ, Peng JJ, et al. Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Health Beliefs on Application of Child Safety Seat. Environ Occupational Med. 2019;36(07):638–44.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Peng Y, Zhang M, Yan S, Li X, Yang J, Fan G, Li L. Evaluation of parental education using biomechanical visualization to increase child restraint use in China. Accid Anal Prev. 2022;169:106633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jin Y, Deng X, Ye PP, Duan LL. The Analysis Model Influencing the Application of Child Safety Seat through Constructing Self-Confidence, Motivation and Authority Suggestions. Chinese J Epidemiol. 2019;40(11):1376–8-1379-1380.

  46. Ang JY, Lai JM, Hss AS, Ramalingam P, Ramasamy M, Zainuddin NS, Shaari H, Ahmad-Aduan A, Sanimi NS, Bahari N. Awareness, perception and experience on child restraint system (CRS) and its legislation among Malaysian parents with newborns. Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(4):278–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hunter K, Bestman A, Dodd M, Prinsloo M, Mtambeka P, van As S, Peden MM. Overloaded and Unrestrained: A Qualitative Study with Local Experts Exploring Factors Affecting Child Car Restraint Use in Cape Town, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):4974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rok Simon M, Korošec A, Bilban M. The influence of parental education and other socio-economic factors on child car seat use. Zdravstveno varstvo. 2017;56(1):55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yan S, Yang J, Fu J, Ding K, Ye W, Chen X, Fan G, Li L. Assessing an App-Based Child Restraint System Use Intervention in China: An RCT. Am J Prev Med. 2020;59(3):e141–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Li Y, Zhao T, Kang N, Wang W, Liu Q, Namgung M. Analysis of the factors influencing parents’ support for child safety seat legislation in Nanjing. Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(4):187–92.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to convey a special tribute to the children and their caregivers who participated in this study. The authors also acknowledge the support of the staff and management of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing, Qingdao University, No.38 Dengzhou Road, Qingdao, 266021, Shandong Province, China

    Yaru Sun, Ting Liu, Xin Wang, Mingqin Lu, Ying Luo & Xiuling Yang

  2. The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China

    Junyu Chen & Juan Huang

Authors
  1. Yaru Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ting Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junyu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mingqin Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ying Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiuling Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.R.S. and X.L.Y. initiated the study and contributed to the study design, data collection, and interpretation of results. T.L. and J.Y.C. contributed to the study design, data collection and revision and drafting of the manuscript. J.H. contributed to data collection. X.W, M.Q.L. and Y.L. contributed to data collection and management of the laboratory procedures. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuling Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University and Ethics Committee (QDU-HEC-2021176). Voluntary informed consent was obtained from the parents/caretakers of the children before participating in the study after an explanation of the nature and purpose of the study, the potential benefits and risks if any.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

General information questionnaire.

Additional file 2.

IMB model questionnaire.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Liu, T., Chen, J. et al. Analysis of factors influencing the use of child restraint system by parents of children aged 0–6 years: an information, motivation, behavioral skills model-based cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr 23, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03827-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03827-9

Keywords

  • Parents
  • Child restraint System
  • IMB model
  • Influencing factors

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us