Skip to main content

Suspected clinical chorioamnionitis with peak intrapartum temperature <380C: the prevalence of confirmed chorioamnionitis and short term neonatal outcome



Chorioamnionitis (CA) affects up to 3.9% of all deliveries worldwide and is one of the leading causes of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Fever≥380C is an essential criterion for the diagnosis of clinical CA. Obstetricians frequently take the maternal risk factors into consideration, and many mothers are treated as CA even with peak intrapartum temperature (PIT) between 37.60C to 37.90C if they have other clinical signs and risk factors.


To estimate the prevalence of confirmed chorioamnionitis and adverse neonatal outcomes among those mothers with PIT below 380C.

Materials and methods

Retrospective chart review among mothers delivered at Al-Wakra Hospital, Qatar, between1stJanuary2016 to 31stDecember 2019 with a clinical suspicion of CA.


Among 21,471 mothers, 442 were suspected of having CA (2.06%, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.26%). After exclusions, 415 were included in the study, 203(48.9%) mothers had PIT between 37.6-37.90C. There was no significant difference in the rate of confirmed CA between the low (<380C) and higher (≥380C) temperature groups (25.4%Vs.31.3%, OR0.75, 95%CI0.46-1.25 , p.262). More patients in the low-temperature group received paracetamol for PIT between 37.6 to 37.9 0C, while it was less frequently used for such milder elevation in higher temperature group (88.2%Vs.38.9%, OR11.69, 95% CI 6.46-2.15, p <.001).


The incidence of suspected clinical CA in our institution was within the international rates. Although nearly half of the mothers with suspected clinical CA had peak temperature below the recommended diagnostic criteria, the rate of confirmed CA and neonatal outcome was not significantly different from those with PIT≥380C. Early antipyretic use might have affected further elevation of temperature.

Peer Review reports


Intraamniotic infection (IAI) or Chorioamnionitis (CA)refers to the infection of the amniotic fluid, membranes, placenta, and/or deciduas. At term, CA complicates approximately 1 to 4 percent of deliveries overall [1,2,3]. CA is a well-recognized risk factor for early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) [4, 5].

Overall, 40 percent of cases of EOS have associated CA [2]. Adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes of CA include perinatal death, asphyxia, early-onset neonatal sepsis, septic shock, pneumonia, meningitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, cerebral white matter damage, and long-term disability, including cerebral palsy, as well as morbidity related to preterm birth [5,6,7,8,9,10].

The acute symptomatic condition which often presents with fever, uterine tenderness, genital discharge, tachycardia, and evidence of fetal infection, is termed clinical chorioamnionitis while the finding of acute placental inflammatory changes with or without evidence of infection is termed histological chorioamnionitis [11].

Among very preterm infants (< 32 weeks) born spontaneously, the risk of cerebral palsy at a corrected age of 2 years was higher among those exposed to clinical chorioamnionitis but not histologic chorioamnionitis [12]. Among term neonates with perinatal asphyxia, both clinical and histological chorioamnionitis were associated with a persistent state of metabolic acidosis in neonates which may contribute to adverse neurologic outcome [13].

Prolonged labor and premature rupture of membranes, multiple digital vaginal examinations, cervical insufficiency, nulliparity, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, internal fetal or uterine contraction monitoring, and presence of genital tract pathogens are important risk factors for CA [1, 2].

The manifestations include fever, leukocytosis >15000 cells/mm3, feto-maternal tachycardia, uterine tenderness, foul-smelling amniotic fluid, and sometimes bacteremia.

Histopathology of affected placentae may reveal chorioamnionitis with or without funisitis. The maternal complications include dysfunctional labor, localized infections, and sepsis.

The conventional diagnostic criteria for CA clinical diagnosis included Peak Intrapartum Temperature (PIT) ≥380C plus at least one feature from leukocytosis>15000 cells/mm3, fetal tachycardia >160 beats per minute, maternal tachycardia >100 beats per minute, uterine tenderness, and foul-smelling amniotic fluid.

The recent diagnostic criteria suggested by a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop expert panel and endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) [14] is as follows:

A presumptive diagnosis of CA can be made in women with fever (≥39.0°C [102.2°F] or 38.0°C [100.4°F] to 38.9°C [102.02°F] on two occasions, 30 minutes apart) without another clear source plus one or more of the following: a)baseline fetal heart rate >160 beats/min for ≥10 minutes, excluding accelerations, decelerations, and periods of marked variability, c)maternal white cell count >15,000 cells/mm3 b)purulent-appearing fluid coming from the cervical os, visualized by speculum examination. The new criteria excluded maternal tachycardia and uterine tenderness.

A confirmed CA is based on the presence of the above criteria plus positive amniotic fluid test result (gram stain, glucose level, or culture results consistent with infection) or placental pathology demonstrating histologic evidence of placental infection or inflammation [14].

Women with clinical CA should receive broad-spectrum antibiotics promptly to initiate treatment of both the mother and fetus [14]. Maternal intrapartum fever has been associated with a higher frequency of fetal tachycardia, intervention for non-reassuring electronic fetal monitoring, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, neonatal depression, neonatal encephalopathy, perinatal arterial ischemic stroke, neonatal seizures, and NICU admission [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Hence fever should be treated by antipyretics.

The American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn (AAP-COFN) recommended partial sepsis workup and presumptive antibiotics to all newborn babies born with suspected maternal CA [34]. Current evidence-based strategies like Early-onset Sepsis risk Calculator (EOSCAL) [35] focuses on maternal temperature and associated risk factors rather than the clinical diagnosis of chorioamnionitis.

Although fever (≥380C) is an essential criterion for diagnosing CA, obstetricians frequently take the risk factors into consideration, and many mothers are treated as CA even with PIT 37.6-37.90C if they have other clinical signs or risk factors. An audit conducted in AWH (2018) showed that 50% of clinically suspected cases of CA did not satisfy the diagnostic criteria, including fever. We observed that most mothers received antipyretics at a lower temperature range (37.6 to 37.90C). We hypothesized that early use of antipyretics might be blunting the clinical picture of CA.


Primary objective

To estimate the prevalence of confirmed CA among mothers who delivered in AWH between Jan 2016 and Dec 2019 and had suspected clinical CA with a PIT between 37.60C -37.90C.

Secondary objectives

  1. 1.

    To estimate the incidence and trend of suspected clinical CA among mothers delivering at AWH.

  2. 2.

    To compare the maternal risk factors, clinical features, final diagnosis, and short-term neonatal outcome between those with PIT <380C (group 1) and those with temp 380C and more (group 2).


Study design

Retrospective data analysis.


The study was conducted at Al Wakra Hospital (AWH), Qatar, from July to Dec 2020. This was a retrospective data analysis. Data was collected for neonates exposed to suspected clinical chorioamnionitis and admitted to the NICU between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2019.


Inclusion criteria

All the chorioamnionitis-exposed neonates born during the study period and their mothers were included. A case was considered as suspected clinical chorioamnionitis if the obstetrician strongly considered the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis based on clinical features and risk factors. For comparison, subjects were divided into 2 groups (Group 1 = PIT 37.6-37.90C, Group 2 = PIT ≥380C).

Exclusion criteria

  • Cases of CA resulting in abortions or intrauterine fetal deaths

  • Mothers with a known focus of infection other than CA

  • Patients transferred in from the other facilities

  • Babies with significant congenital malformations,

  • Incompletely documented files

  • Mothers with documented intrapartum temperature <37.60C


Maternal data

  1. 1.

    Basic data

    Age, parity, gravida, gestational age at the time of delivery, date and time of birth, and type of delivery were collected.

  2. 2.

    Risk factors

    These included Group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization status, artificial or spontaneous rupture of membranes (AROM or SROM), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF), induced or spontaneous labor, rupture of the membranes (ROM) to delivery duration, number of vaginal examinations during labor, and whether received epidural analgesia or not. The length of labor was calculated as the duration in hours from the onset of regular contractions (2 to 3 moderate to strong contractions/10minute) to the delivery of the baby.

  3. 3.

    Data about diagnostic criteria and intrapartum management

    The data included PIT during labor, use of antipyretic for temperature below 380C, fetal tachycardia and maternal tachycardia. For those with peak temperature 380C or more, previous temperature recordings were reviewed to find if there were any readings between 37.60C and 37.90C for which antipyretics were given. Data regarding uterine tenderness, foul-smelling fluid, and purulent cervical discharge were not well- documented and hence were not collected. Data regarding intrapartum GBS prophylaxis and broad-spectrum antibiotic use were collected with the timing in relation to the delivery. White blood cell count (WBC) before delivery, highest C-reactive protein before delivery, blood culture, and mode of delivery were checked.

  4. 4.

    Data about placental pathology and culture

    As both placental histopathology and amniotic fluid culture have limited utility in immediate perinatal patient care, these were not routinely performed in our practice. Placental histopathology was performed only among a small proportion of the study sample. Because of the limited utility and invasive nature, amniotic fluid aspiration was not performed in any of the subjects. Our obstetric team considered placental culture as a surrogate for amniotic fluid culture. Patients with either positive histopathology or placental culture were considered to have a confirmed CA. The growth of any significant pathogenic bacteria from the placenta was included.

Neonatal data

  1. 1.

    Basic data

    Date and time of birth, gestational age at birth, birth weight, and sex.

  2. 2.

    Perinatal data

    Apgar score, need for positive pressure ventilation at birth, and temperature at birth.

  3. 3.

    Details regarding diagnosis, management, and outcome

    These included symptoms upon admission WBC count, highest CRP during the first 24 hours, blood culture, cerebrospinal fluid study, highest respiratory support needed, antibiotic duration, discharge diagnosis, length of stay in NICU and readmission for sepsis within one week after discharge.

Data sources

Since all the babies exposed to suspected clinical CA were admitted to the newborn nursery, the NICU admission registry was reviewed to identify the cases. Additional data about the total deliveries, including the intrauterine fetal deaths, were obtained from the labor room registry and the medical records department. The maternal and neonatal variables were collected from the electronic documentation software ‘Cerner Millennium.'

Statistical analysis

All Statistical analyses were done using statistical packages SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the baseline data. The results were reported as mean and standard deviation (SD) or frequencies and percentages as per the type of the data. Associations between two or more categorical variables were assessed using the chi-square (χ2) test or Fisher Exact test wherever appropriate. Quantitative variables means between the two and more than two independent groups were analyzed using unpaired t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). All P values presented are two-tailed, and P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Missing data

Patients with missing variables were excluded from the study.

Consent and ethical considerations

This was a retrospective chart review. All the subjects were de-identified by coding. Hence the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Hamad Medical Corporation waived off the need for consent from the subjects.


Between Jan 2016 and Dec 2019 (48 months), AWH recorded 21554 deliveries (Table 1). Eighty-three cases of intrauterine fetal deaths were excluded. All cases of abortions were also excluded. The final number of deliveries included was 21471. Among them, 442 (2.06%, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.26 %) mothers were suspected of having clinical chorioamnionitis. Twenty-seven cases were excluded because of incompletely documented data. The final study population included 415 mother-infant pairs (Fig. 1). There was a steady increase in the incidence of the suspected cases from 1.16% in 2016 to 3.09% in 2019, with the rate reaching more than double in the 4th year.

Table 1 Incidence of suspected clinical chorioamnionitis
Fig 1.
figure 1

Sample acquisition

The mean maternal age and gestational ages were 28.4 years and 39 weeks, respectively (Table 2). 6.3% of the deliveries were before 37 weeks gestation. 203 (48.9%) of the mothers with suspected clinical CA had their PIT between 37.60C to 37.9 0C (Table 1). Placental histopathology or placental culture was performed for 138 mothers in this low-temperature group, and 25.4% were confirmed to have CA ( 95% CI 18.8% to 33.2%). Among 212 mothers with PIT ≥ 380C, at least one confirmatory test was done for 140 patients, and 31.3% had a confirmed diagnosis (Table 3). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of confirmed CA between the low and high-temperature groups (p = .262).

Table 2 Baseline data
Table 3 Comparison-maternal risk factors

Further, we compared the background risk factors, clinical and laboratory parameters, and neonatal outcomes of the low and high-temperature groups (group 1and group 2). The maternal infection risk factors were compared between the two groups (Table 3).

There was no statistically significant difference in the mean maternal age, mean gestational age, prematurity, GBS carrier state, epidural analgesia, spontaneous rupture of membranes, need for induced labor, mean length of labor, the number of vaginal examinations, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Patients in the group1 were significantly more likely to be nulliparous (p .026, OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.53) and had a higher rate of prolonged rupture of membranes more than 18 hours (p .036, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.57).

In Table 4, we compared the maternal clinical characteristics, lab findings, and the treatments received. Those in the higher temperature group were more likely to have maternal and fetal tachycardia (p .010 and .020, respectively).

Table 4 Comparison of maternal clinical and lab findings, Antipyretic use, mode of delivery, and prevalence of confirmed chorioamnionitis

There were no significant differences in the prevalence of maternal CRP>10 mg%, WBC >15 x103, positive blood Cultures, intrapartum antibiotic use, and mode of delivery.

In the low-temperature group, 88% received paracetamol soon after the spike. In the higher temperature group, 95 babies (44.8%) had at least one preceding temperature reading between 37.6 and 37.90C, and only 38 % of them received paracetamol for this mild elevation of temperature. Hence, when compared to group 2, mothers in group 1 were significantly more likely to receive paracetamol for the borderline elevation of temperature (p <.001, OR 11.69, 95% CI 6.46 to 21.15).

Placental histopathology was performed in 45 patients only. CA was seen in 29 placentae (64%). Among them, 8 had severe CA, and 6 had funisitis. However, there was no statistically significant difference between positive placental pathology between the two groups (p .577, OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.41).

Placenta culture was performed in 275 mothers and was positive in 22.5%. The organisms isolated were as follows:

There were 14 different bacteria cultured from 63 placentae. GBS and E. Coli formed nearly two-thirds of all organisms cultured (Table 5).

Table 5 Organisms cultured from the placentae

When patients with positive placental culture or histopathology were assumed as confirmed cases, 25.4 % of patients in the low PIT group and 31.3% in the higher PIT group had CA. The difference was not statistically significant (p = .262).

The placenta in a vaginal delivery is very likely to be contaminated with vaginal flora. After excluding cultures done from the vaginally delivered placenta, 21 % of patients in group 1 had a confirmed diagnosis of chorioamnionitis. Although the number is significantly less than that of group 2, it is clinically significant.

The short-term outcome of the neonates is compared in Table 6. During the study period, all the babies born to mothers with suspected clinical CA were admitted to NICU and received IV antibiotics for at least 48 hours. Babies in group 1 were more likely to be symptomatic (p.016, OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.81 to 2.92). Respiratory distress was present among all the babies who were symptomatic. Four babies had positive blood CS, and all of them were from group 2. However, the combined outcome of sepsis (both culture-positive and culture-negative) and congenital pneumonia was similar between the two groups (7.4 % in group 1 Vs. 9% in group 2, p 0.341). There was no statistically significant difference in the need for any resuscitation at birth, need for respiratory support in NICU, mean white cell count, CRP, or length of stay. In group 1, five babies required mechanical ventilation and only one baby required ventilation in group 2.

Table 6 Short term outcomes of the neonates


We observed a steady increase in the incidence of the suspected clinical CA from 1.16% in 2016 to 3.09% in 2019. The observed incidence is similar to observations in the previous studies. A recent meta-analysis by Woodd et al. [36] observed an overall incidence of 3.9% (95% CI 1.8% to 6.8%). The wide variation is due to several factors, including differences in ascertainment (prospective studies report higher rates than retrospective studies), differences in the prevalence of risk factors in the populations studied, use of different diagnostic criteria (e.g., clinical versus histologic), and temporal changes in obstetric practice [37].

PIT ≥ 38 0C is an essential clinical criterion for the diagnosis of intraamniotic infection [2, 36]. We found that 48.9% of our mothers with suspected clinical chorioamnionitis had their PIT between 37.60C to 37.9 0C.

At least one confirmatory test was done among 138 of this low-temperature group, and 35 (25.4%) of them were positive for CA. This was not much different from the rate of confirmed cases among 140 patients in the high-temperature group (31.3%), and the difference was statistically insignificant (p = .262). This finding contradicts the established minimum PIT criteria of 380C. Keeping this in mind, we did further analysis of the baseline risk factors, clinical and laboratory parameters, and neonatal outcome in the two groups.

Prolonged rupture of membranes, prolonged labor, multiple vaginal examinations, nulliparity, meconium staining of amniotic fluid, and GBS carrier state are important risk factors for CA [1, 2, 38,39,40,41].

The observed maternal risk factors were similar to the previous studies (Table 7). Similarly, the clinical findings, lab findings, and neonatal outcomes were also comparable to the previously published observations (Table 8). This might justify our clinical suspicion of CA even in the absence of a PIT of 380C and more. In a recent prospective cohort study conducted by Sayyed AA et al. among neonates exposed to suspected CA, 36% had PIT<37.80C [42]. We observed that many of the mothers received intrapartum paracetamol if the temperature increased beyond 37.50C, especially if it happened two or more times. The Obstetric team was concerned about the adverse fetal, maternal, and neonatal outcomes of intrapartum pyrexia and was tempted to use antipyretics at a minimal threshold.

Table 7 Maternal risk factors: Comparison to previous studies
Table 8 Maternal clinical and lab findings, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcome – Comparison to previous studies

Maternal intrapartum fever has been associated with a higher frequency of fetal tachycardia [15, 16], intervention for non-reassuring electronic fetal monitoring [17], operative vaginal delivery [18,19,20], cesarean delivery [15, 18,19,20,21], neonatal depression [15, 19,20,21,22,23], neonatal encephalopathy [22,23,24,25,26,27], perinatal arterial ischemic stroke [27, 28, 32], neonatal seizures [22,23,24, 27, 29,30,31,32,33], and NICU admission [15, 16, 19,20,21].

It is possible that antipyretic administration to patients with intrapartum fever can reduce adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. However, well-conducted studies about this matter are sparse. A more recent nonrandomized study compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes among 54 patients with PIT ≥ 38°C with and without antipyretic treatment. This study did not identify any difference in the frequency of cesarean delivery, presence of meconium, the requirement for neonatal bag/mask ventilation, requirement for continuous positive pressure ventilation, and NICU admission [12].

We hypothesized that the early use of paracetamol might abort further spike of fever and may blunt the clinical picture of CA. We compared the use of paracetamol between the two groups. In group 1, 88.2% of mothers received paracetamol when the temperature rose to > 37.5 0C. Among group 2, ninety five mothers had documented temperature between 37.6 to 37.90C before it increased to 380C or more. However, only 38.9% of these mothers in group 2 received paracetamol for such mild elevation in temperature. This difference between groups 1 and 2 was statistically significant (p<0.001, OR 11.69, 95% CI 6.4 to 21.1) (Table 4). Our search did not identify published studies that examined the effect of prior use of paracetamol on the clinical picture of CA. Lesson T et al. [57]. observed that in febrile parturients, paracetamol halted an increasing trend and stabilized the fetal temperature. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study, Goetzl et al. observed that prophylactic paracetamol did not prevent epidural-induced fever in nulliparous women [58].

Limitations of the study

In addition to being retrospective, we were limited by the availability of a confirmed diagnosis. As both placental histopathology and amniotic fluid culture have limited utility in immediate patient care, these were not routinely performed in our practice. Placental histopathology was performed only among a small proportion of the study sample. Because of the limited utility and invasive nature, amniotic fluid aspiration was not performed in any of the subjects. We used placental culture as a surrogate for amniotic fluid culture.


Our study observed that nearly half of the mothers with suspected clinical CA had PIT < 380C. The overall maternal risk factors, maternal clinical and laboratory findings, and neonatal outcomes were similar to those in the previously published studies. There was no significant difference in the above factors or the rate of confirmed diagnosis between the low and higher temperature groups. We suspect that the use of antipyretics for intrapartum temperature <380C may blunt the clinical picture of CA. Well-designed randomized prospective studies are required to examine the effect of antipyretics on clinical manifestations of CA. 

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are uploaded as supporting documents.



Al Wakrah Hospital




C-Reactive Protein


Cerebrospinal Fluid


Early Onset Sepsis Risk Calculator


Early-onset sepsis


Group B Streptococcus


Intra amniotic infection


Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid


Neonatal Intensive Care Unit


Peak Intrapartum temperature


Rupture of membranes


Spontaneous rupture of membranes


White Blood Cells


  1. Chorioamnionitis Newton E, Infection Intraamniotic. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36(4):795–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tita A, Andrews W. Diagnosis and Management of Clinical Chorioamnionitis. Clin Perinatol. 2010;37(2):339–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gibbs R, Duff P. Progress in pathogenesis and management of clinical intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(5):1317–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Escobar G, Li D, Armstrong M, Gardner M, Folck B, Verdi J, et al. Neonatal Sepsis Workups in Infants ≥2000 Grams at Birth: A Population-Based Study. Pediatrics. 2000;106(2):256–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander J, McIntire D, Leveno K. Chorioamnionitis and the Prognosis for Term Infants. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(2):274–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoder P, Gibbs R, Blanco J, Castaneda Y, St. Clair P. A prospective, controlled study of maternal and perinatal outcome after intra-amniotic infection at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol  1983;145(6):695–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lau J, Magee F, Qiu Z, Houbé J, Von Dadelszen P, Lee S. Chorioamnionitis with a fetal inflammatory response is associated with higher neonatal mortality, morbidity, and resource use than chorioamnionitis displaying a maternal inflammatory response only. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3):708–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aziz N, Cheng Y, Caughey A. Neonatal outcomes in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes complicated by chorioamnionitis. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(9):780–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramsey P, Lieman J, Brumfield C, Carlo W. Chorioamnionitis increases neonatal morbidity in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(4):1162–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greco P, Nencini G, Piva I, Scioscia M, Volta C, Spadaro S, et al. Pathophysiology of hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy: a review of the past and a view on the future. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020;120(2):277–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim C, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yoon B, Kim Y. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):S29–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Maisonneuve E, Lorthe E, Torchin H, Delorme P, Devisme L, L’Hélias L, et al. Association of Chorioamnionitis with Cerebral Palsy at Two Years after Spontaneous Very Preterm Birth: The EPIPAGE-2 Cohort Study. J Pediatr. 2020;222:71–78.e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson C, Burd I, Raghunathan R, Northington F, Graham E. Perinatal inflammation/infection and its association with correction of metabolic acidosis in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Perinatol. 2016;36(6):448–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins R, Saade G, Polin R, Grobman W, Buhimschi I, Watterberg K, et al. Evaluation and Management of Women and Newborns With a Maternal Diagnosis of Chorioamnionitis. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(3):426–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burgess A, Katz J, Moretti M, Lakhi N. Risk Factors for Intrapartum Fever in Term Gestations and Associated Maternal and Neonatal Sequelae. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82(5):508–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang C, Schroeder I, Cazales A, Kim R, Albert A, Elwood C, et al. Management of fever in labor after institution of a standardized order set at a maternity quaternary care center. American J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(6):687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reilly DR, Oppenheimer LW. Fever in term labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005;27(3):218–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ashwal E, Salman L, Tzur Y, Aviram A, Ben-Mayor Bashi T, Yogev Y, et al. Intrapartum fever and the risk for perinatal complications - the effect of fever duration and positive cultures. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(11):1418–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lieberman E, Cohen A, Lang J, Frigoletto F, Goetzl L. Maternal intrapartum temperature elevation as a risk factor for cesarean delivery and assisted vaginal delivery. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(4):506–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dior UP, Kogan L, Eventov-Friedman S, Gil M, Bahar R, Ergaz Z, et al. Very High Intrapartum Fever in Term Pregnancies and Adverse Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes. Neonatology. 2016;109(1):62–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lange EMS, Segal S, Pancaro C, Wong CA, Grobman WA, Russell GB, et al. Association between Intrapartum Magnesium Administration and the Incidence of Maternal Fever: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(6):942–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Perlman JM. Hyperthermia in the delivery: potential impact on neonatal mortality and morbidity. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33(1):55–63 vi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blume HK, Li CI, Loch CM, Koepsell TD. Intrapartum fever and chorioamnionitis as risks for encephalopathy in term newborns: a case-control study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(1):19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Törnell S, Ekéus C, Hultin M, Håkansson S, Thunberg J, Högberg U. Low Apgar score, neonatal encephalopathy and epidural analgesia during labour: a Swedish registry-based study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(4):486–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JM, Alessandri LM, O’Sullivan F, Burton PR, et al. Intrapartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study. BMJ. 1998;317(7172):1554–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Impey LW, Greenwood CE, Black RS, Yeh PS, Sheil O, Doyle P. The relationship between intrapartum maternal fever and neonatal acidosis as risk factors for neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):49.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kasdorf E, Perlman JM. Hyperthermia, inflammation, and perinatal brain injury. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;49(1):8–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li C, Miao JK, Xu Y, Hua YY, Ma Q, Zhou LL, et al. Prenatal, perinatal and neonatal risk factors for perinatal arterial ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(8):1006–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Greenwell EA, Wyshak G, Ringer SA, Johnson LC, Rivkin MJ, Lieberman E. Intrapartum temperature elevation, epidural use, and adverse outcome in term infants. Pediatrics. 2012;129(2):e447–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Petrova A, Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC, Marcella S, Ananth CV. Association of maternal fever during labor with neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(1):20–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Glass HC, Pham TN, Danielsen B, Towner D, Glidden D, Wu YW. Antenatal and intrapartum risk factors for seizures in term newborns: a population-based study, California 1998–2002. J Pediatr. 2009;154(1):24–28.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Giraud A, Guiraut C, Chevin M, Chabrier S, Sébire G. Role of Perinatal Inflammation in Neonatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke. Front Neurol. 2017;8:612.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Spain JE, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Cahill AG. Risk factors for serious morbidity in term nonanomalous neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):799.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Polin RA, Watterberg K, Benitz W, Eichenwald E. The conundrum of early-onset sepsis. Pediatrics. 2014;133(6):1122–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuzniewicz MW, Puopolo KM, Fischer A, Walsh EM, Li S, Newman TB, et al. A Quantitative, Risk-Based Approach to the Management of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(4):365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Woodd SL, Montoya A, Barreix M, Pi L, Calvert C, Rehman AM, et al. Incidence of maternal peripartum infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019;16(12):e1002984.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Froggatt JW. Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(2):304–9 discussion 309-10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, Farine D, Ohlsson A, Wang EE, et al. International Multicentre Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(5):1024–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tran SH, Caughey AB, Musci TJ. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid is associated with puerperal infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(3):746–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheng YW, Delaney SS, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. The association between the length of first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(5):477.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cohen-Cline HN, Kahn TR, Hutter CM. A population-based study of the risk of repeat clinical chorioamnionitis in Washington State, 1989–2008. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(6):473.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Afjeh S, Sabzehei MK, Mansor Ghanaie R, Karimizadeh M, Shamshiri AR, Esmaili F. Chorioamnionitis and Neonates; Which Strategy? Arch Iran Med. 2020;23(7):480–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 80: premature rupture of membranes. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):1007–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Dalton HP. Risk factors for intraamniotic infection: a prospective epidemiologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(3):562–6 discussion 566–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rickert VI, Wiemann CM, Hankins GD, McKee JM, Berenson AB. Prevalence and risk factors of chorioamnionitis among adolescents. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(2):254–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Romero R, Hanaoka S, Mazor M, Athanassiadis AP, Callahan R, Hsu YC, et al. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a risk factor for microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(3):859–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Venkatesh KK, Jackson W, Hughes BL, Laughon MM, Thorp JM, Stamilio DM. Association of chorioamnionitis and its duration with neonatal morbidity and mortality. J Perinatol. 2019;39(5):673–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cahill AG, Duffy CR, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Zhao Q, Macones GA. Number of cervical examinations and risk of intrapartum maternal fever. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(6):1096–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lieberman E, Lang J, Richardson DK, Frigoletto FD, Heffner LJ, Cohen A. Intrapartum maternal fever and neonatal outcome. Pediatrics. 2000;105(1 Pt 1):8–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sahni M, Franco-Fuenmayor ME, Shattuck K. Management of Late Preterm and Term Neonates exposed to maternal Chorioamnionitis. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):282.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Duff P. Maternal and perinatal infection—bacterial. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, editors. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2012. p. 1140–55.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Holzman C, Lin X, Senagore P, Chung H. Histologic chorioamnionitis and preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(7):786–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Smulian JC, Shen-Schwarz S, Vintzileos AM, Lake MF, Ananth CV. Clinical chorioamnionitis and histologic placental inflammation. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(6):1000–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Romero R, Miranda J, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Martinez A, et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term I: microbiology of the amniotic cavity using cultivation and molecular techniques. J Perinat Med. 2015;43(1):19–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Shalak LF, Perlman JM, Jackson GL, Laptook AR. Depression at birth in term infants exposed to maternal chorioamnionitis: does neonatal fever play a role. J Perinatol. 2005;25(7):447–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rouse DJ, Landon M, Leveno KJ, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Caritis SN, et al. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration-relationship to outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):211–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lavesson T, Åkerman F, Källén K, Olofsson P. Effects on fetal and maternal temperatures of paracetamol administration during labour: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;168(2):138–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Goetzl L, Rivers J, Evans T, Citron DR, Richardson BE, Lieberman E, et al. Prophylactic acetaminophen does not prevent epidural fever in nulliparous women: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2004;24(8):471–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Ms. Minu George and Ms.Anila Joseph for their hard work during the data collection and data entry. We acknowledge our heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Sarfrazul Abedin for his kind assistance during the statistical analysis.


The study was funded by the medical research centre, Hamad medical Corporation, Qatar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



APV was responsible for the concept, design, literature search, data acquisition, analysis, and manuscript preparation and editing. KS and LH were involved in the concept, design, analysis, and manuscript review. RP, NA, YS and HK were involved in literature search, data acquisition, manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anvar Paraparambil Vellamgot.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Medical Research Centre (MRC) and Institutional review board (IRB) of Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar. Being retrospective and the subjects being de-identified by coding, the need for consent was waived off by the IRB of Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar (Approval no: MRC- 01-20-035). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The institutional approval letter is uploaded as a supporting document consent for publication: Since the study was retrospective and all the subjects were de-identified by coding, consent for publication was not required from the subjects.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vellamgot, A.P., Salameh, K., Habboub, L.H.M. et al. Suspected clinical chorioamnionitis with peak intrapartum temperature <380C: the prevalence of confirmed chorioamnionitis and short term neonatal outcome. BMC Pediatr 22, 197 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Chorioamnionitis
  • Peak intrapartum temperature
  • Antipyretics