Skip to main content

Surgical management of patent ductus arteriosus in pre-term infants - a british paediatric surveillance study

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to provide UK data describing the incidence of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) surgery in the neonatal population, including: pre-ligation management, and outcomes until discharge. We used British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU) methodology; collecting data via questionnaires for preterm neonates undergoing PDA ligation (PDAL) between 1st Sept 2012 – 30th Sept 2013. Infants born less than 37 weeks gestation, who underwent PDAL prior to discharge home, with no other structural cardiac abnormality, were included. Information collected included: patient demographics, pre and post-operative clinical characteristics, pre-operative medical management, post-operative complications and outcome.

Results

Over the study, 263 infants underwent PDAL an incidence of 3.07 per 10,000 live births. 88% were born extremely preterm (< 28 weeks) and 60% were male. The commonest reasons for ligation were inability to wean respiratory support (83.7%) and haemodynamically significant PDA (87.8%). Pre-operatively 65.7% received medical therapy. Surgery was performed at a median age of 33 days (range 9-260, IQR 24-48); the corrected age was less than 31 + 6 week in 50.6% babies at PDAL. Most, (90%), of procedures were open ligation; only 9 (3.4%) were catheter occlusions (PDACO). 20.5% of patients had post-operative complications. The 30-day mortality was 3%, with 93.5% surviving to hospital discharge.

Conclusion

This study showed there was little consensus over medical and surgical management of the PDA or timing of surgery.

Peer Review reports

Background

The patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) remains open at day 7 in 65% of neonates born < 28 weeks’ gestation [1] and in 80% at 24-25 weeks [2]. Haemodynamically significant PDA has been associated with respiratory morbidity including: pulmonary haemorrhage (PH), gastrointestinal and neurological morbidity [3], chronic lung disease (CLD) [4], necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) [5], intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) [6] and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) [7]. Failure of PDA closure has been associated with increased mortality [8].

When this study was conceived (2011), there was no consensus regarding neonatal PDA management [9]. There were three main approaches. Firstly, conservative: careful ventilation, fluid administration and possibly diuretics. Secondly, pharmacological closure: cyclooxygenase inhibitors (COXi)/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID); Indomethacin or Ibuprofen. There was debate about treatment timing and dosages, with different strategies supported by the medical literature. If medical treatment failed, or was contraindicated surgical ligation was an option. By 2012, use of high dose paracetamol [10] and interventional PDA catheter occlusion (PDACO) [11] was reported, but neither routinely used in UK neonatal practice.

In 2012 there was limited UK data regarding neonatal PDA ligation (PDAL). Retrospective studies [12,13,14] reported PDAL was well tolerated with good initial survival rates; but higher death rates by 1 year of age. Survivors had high rates of CLD and neuro-disability, thought to be complications of prematurity rather than cardiac surgery. An East of England study [14] estimated national demand for PDAL using the Epicure 2 data set [15], calculating that 133 infants born < 26 weeks gestation would require PDAL annually.

The study aimed to review UK practice of PDAL in preterm neonates to help inform clinicians which neonates might benefit from PDA ligation; highlighting procedure complications, and post-operative morbidity and mortality.

Methods

Data collection

A questionnaire (Additional file 1) was sent to all clinicians reporting an infant undergoing PDAL (between 1st Sept 2012 and 30th Sept 2013) through the BPSU “orange card reporting system”, distributed to UK and ROI consultant paediatricians.

Eligible infants were born < 37 weeks’ gestation, underwent PDAL before discharge home, with no other cardiac abnormality. Data included: demographics; pre-operative medical management; clinical status at PDAL; and post-operative complications, including mortality. Missing data, discrepancies and duplicate cases were clarified through contact with reporting clinicians and the CTC (cardiothoracic centre).

Ethics

Application was made to BPSU in 2011 with permission to proceed in September 2012. Funding was through the Sir Peter Tizard Bursary (held by Dr. Lee). Study ethics approval was granted by NRES Committee - East Midlands - Derby (Reference: ECC 3-02(FT6)/2012. Informed consent from study participants (written or verbal) for use of routinely collected, then anonymized data was not necessary as per BPSU agreement with the national Confidentiality Advisory Group and Health Research Authority.

Data analysis

Data were transferred into the statistical package Stata v15 (Stata Corp., College Station, Tx) for analysis. Categorical variables were tabulated as frequencies and percentages, missing data was itemised as a separate category. Continuous variables non-normally distributed were summarised using median, range and interquartile range. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess variations in outcome between patient groups defined by their gestational age and weight, at birth and at PDAL. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for procedure complications and death according to sex, gestational age at birth and PDAL, weight at birth and PDAL, and the type of closure procedure. P-values of < 0.05 were taken to indicate statistical significance. Results were not adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing; instead, we chose to present 95% confidence intervals and p-values to allow the reader to judge the evidence for themselves. Using UK birth registration data [16,17,18] we determined births over the study period to calculate the incidence of PDAL per 10,000 live births.

Results

Between 1st Sept 2012 to 30th Sept 2013, the BPSU received 528 notifications of neonatal PDAL. Only one response was received from ROI, therefore we concentrated on UK data. After identifying duplicate notifications, 263 babies were included (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Case identification

Incidence

There were 856,794 UK livebirth registrations over the study; the incidence of PDAL was 3.07 per 10,000 births.

Demographics

Of the 263 babies undergoing PDAL, 231 (88%) were born extremely preterm (< 28 weeks gestation), 60% were male. Two hundred nineteen of the 263 (83%) were extremely low birth weight (≤ 999 g) (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographics of neonates undergoing PDA surgery

Pre-surgery investigations

Of the 263 infants, 229 (87.1%) had their PDA diagnosed clinically and confirmed by echocardiography (echo) in NICU. Thirty-one (11.8%) PDA’s diagnosed by echo were not suspected clinically based upon answers to the questionnaire (Additional file 1), however this may potentially reflect clinician error in reporting. In 3 cases (1.1%) data was not provided. Eight (3%) infants were reported to have their diagnostic echo in the receiving CTC.

Pre-surgery clinical features

Common reasons for PDAL were haemodynamic significance (n = 231, 87.8%), inability to wean respiratory support (n = 220, 84%) and cardiovascular instability (n = 81, 31%). Some infants had multiple reasons documented (Table 2). In this study, haemodynamic significance was not based on any pre-defined criteria or measurements and left to the discretion of the reporting clinicians.

Table 2 Decision to refer for surgery based on gestational age at birth, with P values

Extremely preterm and lower birth weight infants were more likely to be referred for inability to wean respiratory support, p = 0.010 and p = 0.042 respectively. Moderately preterm infants were referred because of poor growth (p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Pre-surgery medical management

One hundred and seventy three (65.7%) of the cohort received medical treatment before referral. The majority (n = 143, 82.6%) received targeted therapy, 3 infants had prophylactic treatment. In 27 cases (15.6%), there was insufficient information. Ibuprofen was most frequently used (n = 148, 85.6%) with 11 (6.4%) receiving Indomethacin. Seven infants received both drugs. In 7 cases there was no information. Almost half of treated babies (n = 83, 48%) received one course of Ibuprofen; 42% (n = 73) received 2 courses, and one received 3 courses. Treatment was completed in 122 (70.5%) cases. The commonest reasons for discontinuing treatment were deranged renal function (35.5%, n = 11) and suspected sepsis (22.6%, n = 7). Seventy four (28.1%) babies were not treated medically, of these 56 (75.7%) had several reasons documented, with renal impairment being the most frequent (24.3%) (Table 3).

Table 3 Reasons for not using NSAID pre-surgery

Morbidity pre- PDAL

Neurology

Overall 106 (40.3%) babies had IVH and 13 (4.9%) of the whole cohort had parenchymal involvement. Eighteen (6.8%) had documented ROP pre-surgery. Unsurprisingly, extremely preterm infants were more likely to have IVH prior to surgery (p = 0.015).

Respiratory

Two hundred and one (76.4%) infants remained mechanically ventilated pre-PDAL, with 124 (61.7%) having an oxygen requirement > 40%. Thirty-eight (14.4%) were receiving CPAP, with 7 (18.4%) having an oxygen requirement > 40%, consistent with significant compromise. PH was reported in 30 (11.4%) babies.

Cardiovascular

Inotropes were being administered to 26 (9.9%) infants, and fluid restriction (based on local practice) was part of the medical management in 102 (38.8%) infants at PDAL. There were no significant differences by gestation or birth weight.

Nutrition

NEC was confirmed radiologically in 70 (26.7%) infants pre-PDAL. Almost half the babies (n = 125, 47.5%) were on full feeds, 10 (3.8%) on full parenteral nutrition (PN), with 77 (29.2%) receiving some feeds and PN at referral. In 51 cases, no data was provided. The more premature and lower birth weight infants were more likely to be receiving PN at the time of surgery.

Referral pathway

Of the 263 infants referred for PDAL, 199 (75.7%) required ambulance transfer to a CTC. Of these, 129 (64.8%) had been discussed with one CTC and 25 (12.5%) with two or three centres to arrange PDAL. No information was available for 45 (22.5%) babies. Of the whole cohort, 59 (22.4%) babies were in a NICU co-located with a CTC. In 5 cases, data was unavailable.

The interval between referral and PDAL was median 6 (0-42, IQR 3-9) days. Distance travelled was a median of 15 (0 – 123, IQR 2-30) miles, longest distances were in Scotland.

Surgical characteristics

Surgery was performed at median age of 33 (9-260, IQR 24-48) days and median weight 1010 (500-4000, IQR 845.5-1410) grams. At PDAL, 133 (50.6%) babies had a corrected age between 28 and 31 + 6 weeks, and 113 (43%) were < 1 kg. Of the 199 patients transferred to a CTC, 42.2% were classified as a day case procedure. This could mean admission and discharge on same day, or may include one overnight stay.

Surgical procedure

Open ligation was performed in 237 (90%) neonates, including one following an unsuccessful PDACO. PDACO was successfully performed in 9 (3.4%) infants with median weight 2060 (558 – 3388, IQR 1900 - 2620) grams. Method of PDA closure was not documented in 17 (6.5%) cases. All procedures were conducted in a CTC, with 60.8% undertaken in theatre and 29.7% performed on a co-located NICU. In 9.5% of cases this information was unavailable. Procedures were conducted in 13 CTCs, the median number was 13 (4-50, IQR 6-35) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Bar graph illustrating number of PDA surgeries undertaken by cardiothoracic centre

Length of intubation post-procedure

Perioperative ventilation data was reported for 192 of the 283 (73%) babies in the cohort and showed median time from PDAL to extubation of 5 days (0-46, IQR 2-12). Babies who had always been intubated pre-PDAL were extubated after a median of 7 days (1-46, IQR 1-41). Those electively intubated for the procedure were extubated after median of 2 days (0-7, IQR 1-5). Extremely preterm infants took longer to extubate (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in time to extubation between neonates undergoing open ligation compared to PDACO.

Post-operative complications

Post-operative complications occurred in 54 (20.5%) cases, most frequent were: pneumothorax (n = 25, 9.5%), vocal cord palsy (n = 6, 2.3%), wound infection (n = 6, 2.3%) and chylothorax (n = 2, 0.8%) (See additional file 2 for full list). Two infants (0.8%) died on the second post-operative day, in neither was death directly attributed to PDAL. There were no significant differences in complication rates by sub-group analysis (Additional file 3). We did not collect post-procedure information from the CTC regarding post-PDAL syndrome including: haemodynamic instability, inotrope use, blood product administration, ventilator instability or oxygen requirements.

Morbidity post- surgery

Of the 263 infants, 132 (50.2%) developed CLD, defined as need for supplementary oxygen at 36 weeks corrected, 85 (64.4%) received diuretics and 29 (22%) post-natal steroids. Only 18 (13.6%) required no additional medical treatments. Extremely low birth weight babies were more likely to require medical treatment (steroids p = 0.041 and diuretics p = 0.035). 32 (12.2%) infants required laser treatment for ROP following ligation. 12 (4.6%) infants developed further episodes of NEC requiring surgery. No further episodes of PH were documented. There were no significant differences in post-operative co-morbidities by gestational age.

Mortality

There were 17 (6.5%) deaths. For 16 patients the interval between PDAL and death was available, median 33 (2-239, IQR 10-89) days. Eight infants died within 30 days of surgery giving an overall 30-day mortality of 3%. There were no significant differences in mortality rates by sub-group analysis (Additional file 4).

Discussion

This was the first UK wide study to investigate the management of preterm infants undergoing PDAL. Our inclusion criteria were designed to capture neonates failing medical management or where it was contraindicated. In 2012-2013, there was no consensus about optimal management of PDA, timing of medical treatment or when PDA ligation should be considered. These controversies are unchanged in 2021. We believe our study provides important information about PDAL, which is still relevant today. The study highlights the characteristics of babies referred, and provides outcome information about morbidity and survival.

In our study, PDA ligation occurred in 3.07 per 100,000 live births. We note that the prevalence of PDAL in premature babies will be higher, but did not have access to preterm denominator data in order to calculate ligation rates accurately in this population. We also did not have contemporaneous access to the NICOR (National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research) database, which provides information about all UK PDA closures, not just in the neonatal population [19]. Comparisons with NICOR data are difficult, as our study ran over 2 NICOR reporting years, 2012/13 and 2013/14. Their dataset classifies neonates as < 30 days and an infant as 31 days to 1 year of age [20]. Over half of our cohort might be classified as infants, with a median age of 33 days at PDAL, making it almost impossible to cross-reference numbers. Their data identified only a small number of PDACO, consistent with our observations. Subsequent NICOR data up to 2016 (Additional file 5) suggests fewer neonates are undergoing PDA closure, but it will be difficult to apply this to the preterm population because of their classification criteria.

Our study again highlights that a higher proportion of extremely preterm males with extremely low birth weight, and ethnically classified as white, require PDAL; correlating with other published series [21,22,23,24]. The majority of infants in this study were reliant on mechanical ventilation prior to surgery, with 62% needing > 40% oxygen, consistent with significant respiratory compromise. It is a limitation of our study that we did not more accurately define haemodynamic significance in terms of PDA diameter, left atrium: aorta ratios or blood flow patterns. Many of the infants required ambulance transfer with the additional resources and challenges this poses. Some CTCs performed more surgical procedures than others, which may simply reflect the geographical population they serve, but could signify different referral practices for surgical intervention. Such variations are likely to continue until there is a greater consensus regarding management of the neonatal PDA.

The overall mortality rate in our study was 6.5%, with a 30-day mortality rate of 3%. It is reassuring that PDA surgery appears a relatively safe procedure in this challenging patient population. Complication rates were recorded as 20.5%, most such as pneumothoraces and wound infections were easily treated. Vocal cord palsies and chylothoraces should be considered more chronic complications.

The most common pre-surgical co-morbidities were IVH and NEC, in keeping with published literature [25, 26]. It has been suggested that the incidence of CLD increases following PDA surgery [4, 12,13,14, 25, 26]. In our cohort, 50% of babies had CLD, but in reality, this will be an underestimate as 28% had either not reached 36 weeks corrected age or had died by study close. As this was a nationwide questionnaire based study, we could not identify case-control groups to compare whether rates of CLD and other complications were statistically higher following surgical closure, which is a limitation of our observational study.

It is important to consider whether this study is relevant to neonatologists in 2021. In 2014, Heuchan et al. [27], reported that the optimal management of the PDA in premature infants remained controversial, as did Sankar et al. [28] in 2019. Over the 7 years since this study ended there have been many advances in neonatal care: including the wider use of paracetamol [29]; different evidence-based approaches to the management of respiratory distress syndrome [30]; and new techniques for less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) [31] all of which may have contributed to fewer neonates and infants requiring PDA closure, as suggested by the NICOR data. Despite these advances, PDA management remains controversial. There is still no consensus on whether to, or when to treat pharmacologically. Many clinicians now accept a PDA, treating fewer medically and limiting PDAL to babies with worsening respiratory failure. There are ongoing worldwide trials assessing the benefits of early versus no pharmacological treatment: the OSCAR Study [32], Beneductus Trial [33] and EPAR Trial [34]. The recent international PDA-TOLERATE pilot exploratory trial [35] with 202 infants, showed no difference in PDA ligation rates between the control and treatment groups. Small numbers of neonates will continue to require PDA closure with increasing evidence that transcatheter closure is being safely used [36].

Conclusion

Our study provides important information on approaches to PDA management across the UK in 2012/2013. Extremely preterm and extremely low birth weight male infants were more likely to undergo PDAL due to failed pharmacological treatment and / or ongoing invasive ventilation requirement. This study suggests that PDAL has a high survival rate (93.5%), with the majority of patients (80%) suffering no complications. It also suggests a potential link between PDA surgery and CLD needing on-going treatment.

This study confirmed there was variation in medical management used prior to referral for PDAL. This variation persists in 2021 with ongoing debate regarding appropriate management strategies. If our BPSU study was conducted again today, we might find more neonates had been treated medically with Paracetamol, and of those referred for PDA closure, a greater proportion might undergo catheter occlusion.

This study should stimulate the neonatal community to consider standardising the medical and surgical management of neonatal PDA. Getting it right first time (GIRFT) neonatal network reviews should help to identify best practice and identify outliers.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article (and its additional files).

Abbreviations

PDA:

Patent Ductus Arteriosus

BPSU:

British Paediatric Surveillance Unit

PDAL:

PDA Ligation

PDACO:

PDA Catheter Occlusion

PH:

Pulmonary haemorrhage

CLD:

Chronic Lung Disease

NEC:

Necrotising Enterocolitis

IVH:

Intraventricular Haemorrhage

ROP:

Retinopathy of Prematurity

COXi:

Cyclooxygenase inhibitor

NSAID:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

CTC:

Cardiothoracic centre

ROI:

Republic of Ireland

NICU:

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

CPAP:

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

echo:

echocardiograph

PN:

Parenteral nutrition

NICOR:

National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research

References

  1. 1.

    Costeloe K, Hennesy E, Gibson AT, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR. The EPIcure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics. 2000;106:659–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Koch J, Hensley G, Roy L, Brown S, Ramaciotti C, Rosenfeld C. Prevalence of spontaneous closure of the ductus arteriosus in infants at birthweight of 1000g OR LESS. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1113–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kluckow M, Evans N. Ductal shunting, high pulmonary blood flow and pulmonary hemorrhage. J Pediatr. 2000;137:68–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bancalari E, Claure N, Gonzalez A. Patent ductus arteriosus and respiratory outcome in preterm infants. Biol Neonate. 2005;88:192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dollberg S, Lusky A, Reichman B. Patent ductus arteriosus, indomethacin and necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants: a population-based study. J Paediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40:184–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Evans N, Kluckow M. Early ductal shunting and intraventricular haemorrhage in ventilated preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996;75:F183–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    John E, Todd D. Patent ductus arteriosus and retinopathy of prematurity in infants below 27 weeks gestation. J Paed and Child Health. 1988;4(3):171–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Noori S, McCoy M, Friedlich P, Bright B, Gottipati V, Seri I, et al. Failure of ductus arteriosus closure is associated with increased mortality in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2009;123:138–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Benitz W. Patent ductus arteriosus: to treat or not to treat? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97(2):F80–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hammerman C, Bin-Nun A, Markovitch E, Schimmel MS, Kaplan M, Fink D. Ductal closure with paracetamol: a surprising new approach to patent ductus arteriosus treatment. Pediatrics. 2011;128(6):e1618–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Francis E, Singhi A, Lakshmiventakeshaiah S, Kumar R. Transcatheter occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiac Intervent. 2010;3(5):550–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lee LCL, TIllett A, Tulloh R, Yates R, Kelsall W. Outcome following patent ductus arteriosus ligation in premature infants: a retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2006;6:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Heuchan AM, Hunter L, Young D. Outcomes following the surgical ligation of the patent ductus arteriosis in premature infants in Scotland. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Jan;97(1):F39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kang SK, Samsudin S, Kuruvilla M, Dhelaria A, Kent S, Kelsall AW. Outcome of patent ductus arteriosus ligation in premature infants in the east of England: a prospective cohort study. Cardiol Young. 2013;23:711–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Costeloe K, Hennesy E, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper E. Short term outcomes after preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts 1995 and 2006 (EPICure studies). BMJ. 2012;345:e7976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Birth Statistics for England and Wales: https://www.ons.gov.uk/file?uri=/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/datasets/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2014/finalbirthcharacteristicsworkbooktcm7741899012.xls, Accessed Jan 2020.

  17. 17.

    Birth Statistics for Scotland: https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files//statistics/time-series/birth-2017/birth-time-series-17-bt.3.xlsx, Accessed Jan 2020.

  18. 18.

    Birth Statistics for Northern Ireland: https://www.nisra.gov.uk/sites/nisra.gov.uk/files/publications/MonthlyBirths_8.xls, Accessed Jan 2020.

  19. 19.

    https://nicor4.nicor.org.uk/CHD/an_paeds.nsf/WBenchmarksYears?openview&RestrictToCategory=2015&start=1&count=500, Accessed October 2020

  20. 20.

    Bu’Lock F. Closing the patent duct: context and controversy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103:F194–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Morville P, Douchin S, Bouvaist H, Dauphin C. Transcatheter occlusion of the patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants weighing less than 1200g. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103:F198–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Schmidt B, Fanaroff A, et al. Indomethacin prophylaxis, patent ductus arteriosus, and the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: further analyses from the trial of indomethacin prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP). J Pediatr. 2006;148(6):730–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kluckow M, Jeffery M, Gill A, Evans N. A randomised placebo-controlled trial of early treatment of the patent ductus arteriosus. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99(2):F99–F104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rolland A, Shankar-Aguilera S, Diomandé D, Zupan-Simunek V, Boileau P. Natural evolution of patent ductus arteriosus in the extremely preterm infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(1):F55–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chorne N, Leonard C, Plecuch R, Clyman RI. Patent Ductus Arteriosus and its treatment as risk factors for neonatal and neurodevelopmental morbidity. Pediatrics. 2007;119:1165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Madan JC, Kendrick D, Hagadorn JI, Frantz ID. Patent ductus arteriosus therapy: impact on neonatal and 18month outcome. Pediatrics. 2009;123:674–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Heuchan AM, Clyman R. Managing the patent Ductus Arteriosus: current treatment options. Arch Dis Child Fetal and Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F431–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sankar M, Bhombal S, Benitz W. PDA: to treat or not to treat. Congenit Heart Dis. 2019;14(1):46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ohlsson A, Shah P. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for patent ductus arteriosus (a blood vessel necessary for fetal survival) in preterm and low birth weight infants. Cochrane Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010061.pub4.

  30. 30.

    Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Te Pas A, et al. European guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome – 2019 update. Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432–50. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499361 Epub 2019 Apr 11.PMID: 30974433.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Aldana-Aguirre JC, Pinto M, Featherstone RM, Kumar M. Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;F17. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-310299.

  32. 32.

    OSCAR study protocol v6 https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/baby-oscar/clinicians, Accessed Oct 2020.

  33. 33.

    Hundscheid T, Onland W, van Overmeire B, Dijk P, van Kaam AHLC, Dijkman KP, et al. Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial). BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1215-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Schindler T, Smyth J, Bolisetty S, Michalowski J, Lui K. Early PARacetamol (EPAR) trial: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of early paracetamol to promote closure of the ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e031428. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Clyman RI, Liebowitz M, Kaempf J, Erdeve O, Bulbul A, Håkansson S, et al. PDA-TOLERATE Trial: An exploratory randomized controlled trial of treatment of moderate-to-large patent ductus arteriosus at 1 week of age. J Pediatr. 2019;205:41–48.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.012 Epub 2018 Oct 16.PMID: 30340932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sathanandam S, Balduf K, Chilakala S, Washington K, Allen K, Knott-Craig C, et al. Role of Transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure in extremely low birth weight infants. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(1):89–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit for funding this study through the Sir Peter Tizard Bursary. We thank the reporting clinicians who completed questionnaires. Any views expressed in this publication are those of the investigators and not necessarily those of the funding bodies.

We thank Tracey Crosby for her work to maintain the study database.

Funding

This work was supported by the BPSU via The Sir Peter Tizard Bursary.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AW assisted in cleaning and analysing data, wrote the draft manuscript, revised the draft paper and submitted for publication. LS reviewed the data, conducted appropriate statistical analysis and revised the draft paper. AL assisted in data collection, analysing data and revised the draft paper. LL obtained funding via the Sir Peter Tizard Bursary, made application to BPSU and ethics committee, designed data collection tools and critically reviewed the paper prior to publication. WK initiated the project, assisted in design of data collection tools, acted as BPSU liaison and revised and critically reviewed the paper prior to publication. He is guarantor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Kelsall.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Application was made to BPSU in 2011 with permission to proceed in September 2012. Funding was through the Sir Peter Tizard Bursary (held by Dr. Lee). Study ethics approval was granted by NRES Committee - East Midlands - Derby (Reference: ECC 3-02(FT6)/2012.

All clinical and study procedures were performed according to approved local protocol. Informed consent from study participants, their parents/guardians (written or verbal) for use of routinely collected, then anonymized data was not necessary as per BPSU agreement with the national Confidentiality Advisory Group and Health Research Authority.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

BPSU Questionnaire

Additional file 2.

Post-operative complications. Number of patients presenting with a post-operative complication

Additional file 3.

Post-operative complication sub-group analysis. Post-operative complications sorted by gestational age and weight

Additional file 4.

Mortality sub-group analysis. Mortality rates sorted by gestational age and weight

Additional file 5.

NICOR data. NICOR data by year

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warnock, A., Szatkowski, L., Lakshmanan, A. et al. Surgical management of patent ductus arteriosus in pre-term infants - a british paediatric surveillance study. BMC Pediatr 21, 270 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02734-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Neonatal
  • Patent Ductus Arteriosus
  • Ligation
  • Preterm
  • Cardiothoracic