Skip to main content

Feeding patterns and BMI trajectories during infancy: a multi-ethnic, prospective birth cohort

Abstract

Background

Milk feeding type (exclusive breastfeeding [EBF], formula feeding or mixed feeding) and timing of complementary feeding (CF) have been associated with infant growth. However, studies evaluating their combined role, and the role of ethnicity, are scarce. We examined associations of feeding patterns (milk feeding type combined with timing of CF) with infant body mass index (BMI) trajectories and potential ethnic-specific associations.

Methods

Infant feeding and BMI data during the 1st year of life from 3524 children (Dutch n = 2880, Moroccan n = 404 and Turkish n = 240) from the Amsterdam Born Children and their Development (ABCD) cohort were used. Six feeding patterns were defined: EBF/earlyCF, EBF/lateCF (reference), formula/earlyCF, formula/lateCF, mixed/earlyCF and mixed/lateCF. A covariate adjusted latent class mixed model was applied to simultaneously model BMI trajectories and associations with feeding patterns. Potential ethnic differences in the associations were studied in a separate model where interactions between ethnicity and feeding patterns were included.

Results

Four distinct BMI trajectories (low, mid-low, mid-high and high) were identified. Feeding pattern of formula/earlyCF was associated with lower odds for low (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.76) or mid-high (0.28; 0.16, 0.51) (ref: high) trajectory compared with EBF/lateCF pattern (ref). An ethnic-specific model revealed that among Dutch infants, formula/earlyCF pattern was associated with lower odds for low trajectory (0.46; 0.24, 0.87), whereas among Turkish/Moroccan infants almost all feeding patterns were associated with lower odds for the low trajectory (ref: high).

Conclusion

Infant feeding patterns are associated with early BMI trajectories with specific ethnic differences. Future studies should take the role of ethnicity into account in the associations between infant feeding and growth.

Peer Review reports

Background

Childhood overweight and obesity may track into adulthood and are associated with adverse health outcomes from childhood [1, 2]. Rapid growth, i.e. excess weight gain or excess increase in BMI (kg/m2), during 1st year of life is associated with increased risk of later life overweight [3,4,5]. Infant feeding is suggested as one of the most important modifiable factors associated with early growth trajectories and later overweight and obesity [6,7,8].

Milk feeding type, e.g. exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), formula feeding or a combination thereof (mixed feeding) has been associated with infant growth outcomes [9,10,11]. In general, (exclusive) breastfeeding has been associated with slower weight and length gain during infancy [12], lower BMI and lower risk of childhood overweight [13] compared with formula feeding. Yet some studies have reported no association between breastfeeding and growth outcomes during infancy [14], childhood [15, 16] or adulthood [17, 18]. Methodological differences across studies, i.e. adjustment for confounders or definitions of breastfeeding might explain these apparent discrepancies [13]. Several studies combined mixed-fed and EBF infants into one breastfed group [19, 20] whereas, in other studies, mixed-fed infants were either considered as formula-fed [21] or excluded from the analysis [9]. In addition to milk feeding type, some evidence suggests that the timing of complementary feeding (CF) may influence body weight and BMI during childhood, yet evidence is mixed [22]. Later CF has been associated with lower prevalence of childhood and adult overweight [16, 17]. Other studies suggested reverse causality [23] or no associations [24,25,26] between timing of CF and infant weight gain or childhood overweight.

Most previous studies investigating the associations of milk feeding type or timing of CF have mutually adjusted for these factors to evaluate their independent effects on later growth outcomes. However, some studies reported an interaction between these factors [27,28,29]. Early CF in formula- or mixed-fed infants has been associated with increased infant weight gain [27] or childhood overweight [28]. On the contrary, one study reported that late CF introduction among EBF infants was associated with an increased prevalence of overweight [29]. Therefore, the combination of different milk feeding types with timing of CF should be further investigated.

Considerable ethnic differences exist in infant feeding practices and childhood overweight prevalence [30,31,32]. In the Netherlands, mothers of Turkish or Moroccan ethnicity are reported to provide longer duration of EBF or mixed feeding than mothers of Dutch ethnicity [33, 34]. However, children from Turkish or Moroccan ethnicities have a higher infancy weight gain and childhood overweight prevalence compared to children of Dutch ethnicity [32, 33, 35]. Hence, it is of interest to improve our understanding of potential ethnic differences in the association between infant feeding patterns and growth.

Our main objectives were: (i) examine associations of feeding patterns (i.e. milk feeding type during the first 3 months of life combined with timing of CF) with distinct infant BMI trajectories and (ii) determine potential ethnic differences in these associations. Additionally, we examined overweight prevalence at 5–6 years among the identified BMI trajectories.

Methods

Subjects

Data were obtained from the Amsterdam Born Children and their Development (ABCD) study, a large prospective birth cohort in Amsterdam, the Netherlands [36]. Between January 2003 and March 2004, all pregnant women (n = 12,373) living in Amsterdam were invited to participate in this study by filling out a pregnancy questionnaire. Of these women, 8266 women completed the questionnaire during their 12–14th week of pregnancy and 7863 gave birth to a live singleton infant. For the purpose of the current study, infants from the three largest ethnic groups with at least one measurement of both body weight and length during the first year were included; Dutch (n = 2998), Moroccan (n = 437) and Turkish (n = 270). Ethnicity of the mother and her infant was defined as the country of birth of the mother or maternal grandmother to include first and second generation immigrants [37]. Moroccan and Turkish ethnicities were of particular interest due to relatively high prevalence of overweight from early childhood onwards [35]. These ethnic groups were combined for the analysis because of the low number of participants in both groups and previously reported similarities in infant feeding and growth of the infants [33, 34]. Children with missing values on feeding pattern (n = 97) or at least one of the following covariates: maternal educational level (n = 17), maternal pre-pregnancy BMI (n = 10), maternal smoking during pregnancy (n = 137), gestational age (n = 3), birth weight (n = 10) were excluded. The final study sample consisted of 3524 children (Fig. 1). The ABCD study was approved by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, the Medical Ethical Examining Committees of all Amsterdam Hospitals and the Municipal Privacy Protection Committee of Amsterdam and was developed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.

Fig. 1
figure1

A flowchart of the selection of analyzed study population

Measures

Infant feeding pattern

Information about infant feeding (EBF duration and the child’s age when receiving formula and CF) were collected by using a questionnaire, administered at the Youth Health Care (YHC) routine visits during the first year. These data were recorded in following categories: none, < 1 month, 1–2.9 months, 3–5.9 months and > =6 months. More detailed description of the data collection procedure has been previously described [33]. EBF was defined as providing only breastmilk, no other solids/fluids except water. CF was defined as any solids or fluids other than breastmilk, infant formula or water.

From the available data, infant feeding patterns were defined based on the milk feeding type provided combined with the timing of CF introduction. We initially aimed to investigate feeding pattern during 0–6 months according to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations to give EBF until 6 months [38], however, the majority of women in the Netherlands discontinue EBF after 3 months [39]. One of the main reasons to discontinue EBF after 3 months is that it is common for women in the Netherlands to return to work after 3 months from the delivery. Prevalence of EBF ≥6 months in our study was only around 18%, close to the Dutch national estimates reported at the time of the study [40]. Therefore, for the milk feeding type, a period of 0–3 months was chosen and sensitivity analyses using the milk feeding type during 0–6 months were carried out. Three milk feeding categories during 0–3 months were established: 1) EBF, defined as exclusive breastfeeding from birth onwards; 2) formula feeding, defined as introducing full formula feeding within the first month after birth and 3) mixed feeding, as any other milk feeding combination which was not described above. Timing of CF was dichotomized as” early” (< 6 months) or” late” (≥6 months) according to the WHO [38]. Although other recommendations exist to introduce CF between 4 and 6 months [41], the numbers for the feeding pattern combinations were not sufficient for the ethnic-specific analyses when using this categorization. In our dataset the vast majority (80% of the mothers) introduced CF between 4 and 6 months, only around 5% before 4 months and 15% after 6 months.

By combining the three categories of milk feeding type and the two categories of CF timing, infants were classified into six feeding patterns: 1) EBF with late CF (EBF/lateCF); 2) EBF with early CF (EBF/earlyCF); 3) formula feeding with late CF (formula/lateCF); 4) formula feeding with early CF (formula/earlyCF); 5) mixed feeding with late CF (mixed/lateCF); and 6) mixed feeding with early CF (mixed/earlyCF). For the analyses, EBF/lateCF feeding pattern was chosen as the reference since this most closely reflects the WHO recommendations [38].

BMI measurements during infancy and at 5–6 years

Data on weight and length (BMI) during the first year were collected during the YHC routine visits where children are invited to at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7.5, 9, and 11 months of age. These data were obtained from the YHC registry. During these visits, height was measured to the nearest millimeter with a Leicester portable height measure (Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Weight was measured to the nearest 100 g with a calibrated Marsden M-4102 scale (Oxfordshire, UK) [36]. From these data, BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. For deriving BMI trajectories, non-standardized BMI values were used. At 5–6 years of age, data on child’s weight and height (for BMI) were obtained from the YHC registry (n = 1235) or the ABCD health examinations (n = 1868). The examinations were conducted by trained research assistants according to a standard protocol [33]. Age- and sex- specific BMI standard deviation (SD) scores were derived according to the WHO growth standards [42] using the Growth Analyzer Software, version 4.0 (Growth Analyzer BV). Overweight (including obesity) was defined as > + 1SD above the median of the WHO growth standards.

Covariates

Data on predefined maternal covariates; pre-pregnancy BMI, educational level, parity and smoking (during pregnancy), were obtained through the pregnancy questionnaire and were self-reported by the mother. Pre-pregnancy BMI was dichotomized as normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2) or overweight (including obesity) (≥25 kg/m2). Educational level was defined as years of education after primary school and categorized as either low: 0–5 years of education; medium: 6–10 years or high: > 10 years [43]. Smoking (no/yes) and parity (primipara/multipara) were dichotomized. Infancy covariates included sex, birth weight (in kg) and gestational age which was dichotomized (term: ≥37 weeks and preterm: < 37 weeks of gestational age). These data were obtained from the YHC registry. Height was not measured at birth and therefore BMI at birth could not be calculated. Trajectories were based on the first available BMI data (usually obtained in the first months after birth) and onwards.

Statistical analysis

A latent class mixed effect model (LCMM) was fitted to the BMI data during infancy [44]. With the LCMM model, we simultaneously estimated k BMI trajectories (i.e. latent classes) and the probability that an infant followed a particular BMI trajectory. The class membership of an infant i was defined by the unobserved discrete variable Ci, where Ci = g if infant i followed BMI trajectory g = 1,.., k. Since it was not known before performing the analysis how many trajectories were present in the data, the number of BMI trajectories k was determined based on the Bayesian Information Criterion. The LCMM consists of two submodels; the linear mixed effect submodel describing each trajectory and the multinomial logistic regression submodel describing the associations between feeding patterns and the infant’s probability to follow a particular trajectory.

Linear mixed effect submodel

The linear mixed effect submodel for BMI trajectory g =1, …, k was parameterized as follows. For the fixed effects, natural cubic spline functions with five degrees of freedom were used. The inner knots of the spline functions were placed at the corresponding percentiles of the data. Additionally, a trajectory specific random intercept and a trajectory specific random slope were used to capture the correlation between the BMI measurements from each infant. This led to the following submodel:

$$ {\left.{Y}_{ij}\right|}_{C_i=g}=f\left({t}_{ij};{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_g\right)+{b}_{ig,1}+{t}_{ij}{b}_{ig,2}+{\epsilon}_{ij} $$

where yij is the jth BMI measurement of infant i obtained at age tij and f(tij, βg) is the natural spline function describing the gth BMI trajectory parametrized by the vector βg. In addition, (big, 1, big, 2) are the random slope and intercept for the gth BMI trajectory and ϵij is a residual term. In our model, the random effects (big, 1, big, 2) were assumed to follow a bivariate normal distribution with means zero and an unstructured covariance matrix Σ. The residual ϵij was assumed to follow a normal distribution with mean zero and variance parameter σ.

Multinomial logistic regression submodel

The multinomial logistic regression submodel described the probability that infant i followed trajectory g. For the two main objectives of this study, two separate LCMM analyses were performed. First, to examine whether feeding patterns were associated with distinct infant trajectories, an additive relation was assumed for all covariates. In this model, we assumed that the effects of the six feeding patterns were the same in Dutch and non-Dutch (i.e. Turkish and Moroccan) infants. With this LCMM, referred to as model 1, the probability that infant i followed trajectory g was given by

$$ \mathit{\Pr}\left({C}_i=g{\left|\boldsymbol{\mathsf{x}}\right.}_i\right)=\frac{\exp \left({\gamma}_{g0}+{\mathit{\mathsf{x}}}_{i1}{\gamma}_{g1}+{\mathit{\mathsf{x}}}_{i2}{\gamma}_{g2}+{\mathit{\mathsf{x}}}_{i3}{\gamma}_{g3}+\cdots +{\mathit{\mathsf{x}}}_{ip}{\gamma}_{gp}\right)}{\sum_{j=1}^k\exp \left({\gamma}_{j0}+{\mathit{\mathsf{x}}}_{i1}{\gamma}_{j1}+{\mathit{\mathsf{x}}}_{i2}{\gamma}_{j2}+{\mathit{\mathsf{x}}}_{i3}{\gamma}_{j3}+\cdots +{\mathit{\mathsf{x}}}_{ip}{\gamma}_{jp}\right)}, $$

Second, to explore potential ethnic differences in the associations of feeding patterns with the trajectories, we combined the feeding patterns and the ethnicity variable into a dummy variable with pre-determined 12 unique values (i.e. 6 feeding patterns for Dutch and 6 feeding patterns for Turkish/Moroccan). In this model, referred to as model 2, the feeding patterns were allowed to have different effects in the Dutch and Turkish/Moroccan infants. In both models, the reference group were Dutch infants with EBF/lateCF pattern. All analyses were conducted using the statistical program R 3.5.2 with package lcmm [44].

Overweight at 5–6 years of age

Based on the fitted LCMM, we calculated the posterior probability of following a certain trajectory for each child. These probabilities were used as weighing of a child’s contribution to each trajectory. For example, a child could contribute to 20, 45 and 35% respectively, to the first, second, and third trajectory. Using the information on child’s BMI at 5–6 years, we then derived the percentage of children with overweight (or obesity) within each trajectory, according to the child’s weighted contribution to each trajectory.

Results

Participants

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the full study population as well as based on ethnicity or the pre-defined feeding patterns. Overall, the most common pattern was EBF/lateCF, including 30% of the participants. Among the Turkish/Moroccan mothers, mixed feeding or EBF/late CF introduction were the 3 largest groups. For Dutch mothers, most apparent feeding group was EBF/late CF with one third of mothers.

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population by ethnicity and feeding patterna

Classification of BMI trajectories

Four BMI trajectories during the first year of life were identified in models 1 and 2 (Fig. 2). Both models resulted in similar trajectories with respect to the shape of the trajectories and the number of infants assigned to each trajectory. The trajectories were classified as low, mid-low, mid-high and high according to the WHO BMI reference percentiles [45]. The most prevalent trajectory, named as “low”, described a relatively stable BMI pattern with values below the median of the WHO growth standards through the 1st year of life. Trajectories “mid-low” and “mid-high” showed an ascending pattern in the BMI values close to or slightly above the median of the WHO growth standard. The trajectory “high” showed a rapid BMI increase during the first 2 months of life and remained at a substantially high BMI value throughout the year, well-above the median of the WHO growth standard.

Fig. 2
figure2

a. BMI trajectories identified by the LCMM, model 1. b. BMI trajectories identified by the LCMM, model 2

Associations of feeding patterns with BMI trajectories

Table 2 presents the results of model 1 describing the covariate adjusted associations between feeding patterns and BMI trajectories. Compared with the reference feeding pattern (EBF/lateCF), infants with a pattern of formula/earlyCF had lower odds of belonging to the low rather than to the high trajectory. Furthermore, formula/earlyCF and mixed/earlyCF were associated with lower odds of belonging to mid-high trajectory compared with the high trajectory.

Table 2 Associations of infant feeding patterns with BMI trajectoriesa, b, c

Ethnic-specific associations of infant feeding patterns with BMI trajectories

The results from model 2 including the ethnic-specific associations (Table 3) revealed that compared with the reference group (EBF/lateCF, Dutch infants), formula/earlyCF pattern of Dutch infants was associated with lower odds for the low compared with the high trajectory. Interestingly, compared with the reference group, all feeding patterns of Turkish/Moroccan infants indicated lower odds of being in the low rather than high trajectory.

Table 3 Ethnic-specific associations of infant feeding patterns with BMI trajectories (model 2) (Dutch, Turkish/Moroccan)a, b, c

Sensitivity analyses including the milk feeding type during 0–6 months, where the reference feeding pattern (EBF/late CF) was defined as EBF ≥ 6 months/CF ≥ 6 months, showed comparable results for most feeding groups compared to our main results (Additional file 1). However, compared to the reference feeding pattern, mixed/late CF (i.e. either mixed feeding or EBF < 6 months combined with CF ≥ 6 months) was associated with higher odds for the low trajectory. Ethnic-specific model showed that among the Dutch both mixed/early CF and mixed/late CF were associated with higher odds for the low trajectory.

Overweight at 5–6 years

The lowest percentage of overweight at 5–6 years of age was observed for the low trajectory (10.1%) whereas the highest was seen for the high trajectory (34.1%); the other groups were intermediate (Table 4). Compared with the Dutch children, percentage of Turkish/Moroccan children with overweight appeared to be higher in all trajectories.

Table 4 Overweight prevalence at age 5–6 years in the BMI trajectories (n = 2753)a

Discussion

Our results showed that specific infant feeding patterns are associated with BMI trajectories during the first year of life and that there are apparent ethnic differences in these associations. Compared with infants who received EBF during the first 3 months with CF introduction after 6 months (reference), infants who were formula-fed with early CF introduction had lower odds for being in the low rather than high trajectory. Ethnic-specific analyses revealed that Dutch infants with a feeding pattern of formula feeding and early CF had lower odds for being in the low trajectory rather than in the high. Among Turkish/Moroccan infants, all feeding patterns were associated (tended to) with lower odds for being in the low trajectory compared with the Dutch (reference) infants.

To our knowledge, three previous studies [27, 46, 47] investigated different combinations of milk feeding types or breastfeeding duration with timing of CF on growth outcomes during infancy. These studies showed inconsistent findings and used somewhat different feeding pattern definitions than our study. In line with our findings, Imai et al. [46] reported greater weight gain during infancy and higher BMI at 6 years among infants who were formula-fed and introduced to CF early (≤5 months) compared to infants receiving EBF for 5 months. However, unlike our study, they did not investigate the group of EBF infants with early CF exposure. The other two studies investigated breastfeeding duration (EBF or mixed feeding) with timing of CF. Baker et al. found that a short duration (< 5 months) of breastfeeding with early CF (4 months) was associated with an increased infant weight gain compared with long duration (> 10 months) of breastfeeding with late CF (≥4 months) [27]. Sun et al. however reported that regardless of breastfeeding duration, early CF (< 4 months) compared with late CF (≥4 months) was associated with above normal BMI at 1 year [47]. Furthermore, previous studies on feeding patterns and later overweight suggested that early (< 4 months) compared with late (≥4 months) CF was associated with childhood overweight only in formula-fed/short breastfed infants [28, 29, 48, 49]. finally, two studies suggested that also delayed CF (> 7 months) was associated with overweight in later life among children receiving EBF [29, 47]. Differences in the study populations, definitions or cut-offs of the feeding exposures are likely to explain the mixed findings. Interestingly, in our sensitivity analyses including milk feeding during 0–6 months, compared to the reference pattern, mixed feeding/lateCF was associated with higher odds for the low trajectory. These results could be partly explained by differences in some characteristics between the reference groups (EBF ≥ 6 months/lateCF vs. EBF ≥ 3months/lateCF in our main analysis). Mothers in the EBF ≥ 6 months/late CF group were less often highly educated (53.6 vs 59.1%), had more often overweight (22.2 vs 18.7%) and had Turkish/Moroccan ethnic background (17.2 vs 14.4%) compared with the reference group in our main analysis. Furthermore, the majority of mothers (51%) in the mixed/late CF group provided rather long duration of EBF (between 3 and 6 months). Due to some very small group sizes (i.e. Dutch EBF/earlyCF only 5.2%) these results should be interpreted with caution. We also cannot exclude the possibility of chance findings. Given the evidence both on the benefits of EBF ≥6 months [13, 27] as well as introducing CF between the age of 4–6 months [41], future studies assessing growth the outcomes should consider alternative categorization of feeding patterns.

In addition to the differences in feeding definitions, large differences exist in the adjustment for confounders across studies. Especially, previous studies on breastfeeding and childhood BMI showed that the associations were largely reduced after adjustment for family-based sociodemographic, or maternal/child lifestyle related factors (i.e. sedentary activities, sleep duration or dietary pattern in toddlerhood) [50, 51]. Although the findings from previous studies on early growth or overweight are controversial and comparison of studies is difficult due to different feeding definitions, evidence from our and several other studies does suggest that especially the combination of formula feeding during early infancy with early CF introduction is associated with rapid infant growth or childhood overweight.

There are several explanations for the observed associations of feeding patterns on infant BMI in our study. Formula feeding is suggested to lead to a more rapid growth during infancy compared to breastfeeding [52]. Possible mechanisms include the composition of formula milk, e.g. higher protein content compared to breastmilk as well as differences in feeding style such as feeding on schema, which may lead to lower ability to self-regulate food intake [53]. Infants who are exposed to formula feeding and early CF may have higher energy and/or protein intakes compared with infants with EBF and late CF [54]. These higher intakes from both milks and foods may consequently lead to more rapid gains in weight (and length), explaining their lower odds for being in the low BMI trajectory [55, 56]. However, we did not have information on the quantity and quality of diet during infancy which may explain the associations observed in our study [54, 57]. It is also possible that our results may reflect reverse causality rather than causal associations; infants who grow more rapidly may have higher energy needs and demand for feedings. This could lead to parents switching from breastfeeding to formula feeding and to introducing CF earlier to these children [23]. However, we have no information on reasons as to why formula was chosen or why CF was introduced.

We observed substantial ethnic differences in the associations of feeding patterns with BMI trajectories, suggesting that ethnicity may modify this association. Nevertheless, irrespective of ethnicity, infants with formula/earlyCF pattern were consistently least likely to be in the low BMI trajectory. Interestingly, compared with the Dutch reference group, nearly all feeding patterns of the Turkish/Moroccan group were associated with lower odds for the low trajectory. In line with our results, previous study [30] found no association between EBF during the first 6 months and BMI development in immigrant (non-Swedish) children, whereas EBF was associated with lower BMI trajectory in Swedish children. These findings suggest ethnic specific associations between infant feeding and growth. This could be explained by differences in other infant feeding practices between certain ethnic groups, for which we lacked information, such as feeding frequency, diet quality or bottle feeding practices [31, 58, 59]. Especially, macronutrient intake after the breastfeeding period may influence the association between breastfeeding and body fat [60]. Also other determinants, such as genetic predisposition [61] or maternal factors such as gestational weight gain or diet during pregnancy are suggested to be important for the ethnic differences in childhood overweight [62].

Our study has several strengths. These include the use of prospective data on infant feeding and growth in a multi-ethnic population. To our knowledge, we are the first to examine associations of infant feeding patterns, including milk feeding type and CF timing, with BMI trajectories across ethnic groups. Unlike some previous studies [9, 10], we modelled BMI trajectories using unstandardized BMI, which is shown to be better suited for longitudinal measures than z-scores [63]. Furthermore, we adjusted for several maternal and infant confounders. However, some limitations should be acknowledged. First, results are based on observational data and do not allow to make conclusions about causal effects of feeding on growth. Although our analyses were adjusted for birth weight, it cannot be ruled out that the observed BMI trajectories are the result of reverse causality. For instance, parents of children with low BMI early in life may respond to this by overfeeding the child (because the child’s growth is below the norm used by YHC, hence extra feeding is advised). In that case a high BMI later in life is not simply caused by feeding itself but the underlying cause of this trajectory may be a response to a low BMI (or weight for height) earlier. Second, our study population included two ethnic minority groups which limits the generalizability of our results to all populations. Also, we conducted ethnic specific analyses (planned a priori) in which some of the feeding groups of Turkish/Moroccan children were of limited sample size. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution. Fourth, although we adjusted our analyses for several known confounders, some of the continuous covariates were categorized in order to avoid estimating non-linear associations, which would have further increased the model complexity. However, categorization of the continuous covariates may be considered suboptimal [64]. Finally, we lacked information on other potentially important maternal or infant related factors, such as gestational weight gain or the quantity and quality of the diet during infancy, which may have also explained some of the observed associations. Future studies should therefore include more detailed nutritional information on infant feeding.

Conclusions

Infant feeding patterns are associated with BMI trajectories during the first year of life with specific ethnic differences. Future studies should take the role of ethnicity into account in the associations between infant feeding and growth.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available upon request due to ethical restrictions related to protecting patient confidentiality. Researchers who are interested in using data for research purposes can apply for access to the ABCD study data by contacting the research committee at abcd@amc.uva.nl or the principal investigator T. G. M. Vrijkotte (t.vrijkotte@amc.uva.nl).

Abbreviations

CF:

Complementary feeding

BMI:

Body mass index

ABCD:

Amsterdam Born Children and their Development study

EBF:

Exclusive breastfeeding

YHC:

Youth Health Care

LCMM:

Latent class mixed effect model

References

  1. 1.

    Baker JL, Olsen LW, Sorensen TI. Childhood body-mass index and the risk of coronary heart disease in adulthood. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(23):2329–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Singh AS, Mulder C, Twisk JW, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):474–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baird J, Fisher D, Lucas P, Kleijnen J, Roberts H, Law C. Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity. Bmj. 2005;331(7522):929.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Monteiro PO, Victora CG. Rapid growth in infancy and childhood and obesity in later life--a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2005;6(2):143–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Willers SM, Brunekreef B, Smit HA, et al. BMI development of normal weight and overweight children in the PIAMA study. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39517.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Patro-Golab B, Zalewski BM, Kolodziej M, et al. Nutritional interventions or exposures in infants and children aged up to 3 years and their effects on subsequent risk of overweight, obesity and body fat: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Obes Rev. 2016;17(12):1245–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Weng SF, Redsell SA, Nathan D, Swift JA, Yang M, Glazebrook C. Estimating overweight risk in childhood from predictors during infancy. Pediatrics. 2013;132(2):e414–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Birch LL, Ventura AK. Preventing childhood obesity: what works? Int J Obes. 2009;33(Suppl 1):S74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bell KA, Wagner CL, Feldman HA, Shypailo RJ, Belfort MB. Associations of infant feeding with trajectories of body composition and growth. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(2):491–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rzehak P, Oddy WH, Mearin ML, et al. Infant feeding and growth trajectory patterns in childhood and body composition in young adulthood. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(2):568–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang J, Himes JH, Guo Y, et al. Birth weight, growth and feeding pattern in early infancy predict overweight/obesity status at two years of age: a birth cohort study of Chinese infants. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e64542.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA, Peerson JM, Lonnerdal B. Growth of breast-fed and formula-fed infants from 0 to 18 months: the DARLING study. Pediatrics. 1992;89(6 Pt 1):1035–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yan J, Liu L, Zhu Y, Huang G, Wang PP. The association between breastfeeding and childhood obesity: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1267.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kramer MS, Guo T, Platt RW, et al. Breastfeeding and infant growth: biology or bias? Pediatrics. 2002;110(2 Pt 1):343–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Burdette HL, Whitaker RC, Hall WC, Daniels SR. Breastfeeding, introduction of complementary foods, and adiposity at 5 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(3):550–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Morgen CS, Angquist L, Baker JL, Andersen AN, Sorensen TIA, Michaelsen KF. Breastfeeding and complementary feeding in relation to body mass index and overweight at ages 7 and 11 y: a path analysis within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107(3):313–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Schack-Nielsen L, Sorensen T, Mortensen EL, Michaelsen KF. Late introduction of complementary feeding, rather than duration of breastfeeding, may protect against adult overweight. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(3):619–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Michels KB, Willett WC, Graubard BI, et al. A longitudinal study of infant feeding and obesity throughout life course. Int J Obes. 2007;31(7):1078–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Eny KM, Chen S, Anderson LN, et al. Breastfeeding duration, maternal body mass index, and birth weight are associated with differences in body mass index growth trajectories in early childhood. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107(4):584–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Carling SJ, Demment MM, Kjolhede CL, Olson CM. Breastfeeding duration and weight gain trajectory in infancy. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):111–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rzehak P, Sausenthaler S, Koletzko S, et al. Period-specific growth, overweight and modification by breastfeeding in the GINI and LISA birth cohorts up to age 6 years. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(8):449–67.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pearce J, Taylor MA, Langley-Evans SC. Timing of the introduction of complementary feeding and risk of childhood obesity: a systematic review. Int J Obes. 2013;37(10):1295–306.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Vail B, Prentice P, Dunger DB, Hughes IA, Acerini CL, Ong KK. Age at weaning and infant growth: primary analysis and systematic review. J Pediatr. 2015;167(2):317–24 e311.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    van Rossem L, Kiefte-de Jong JC, Looman CW, et al. Weight change before and after the introduction of solids: results from a longitudinal birth cohort. Br J Nutr. 2013;109(2):370–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lin SL, Leung GM, Lam TH, Schooling CM. Timing of solid food introduction and obesity: Hong Kong's "children of 1997" birth cohort. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5):e1459–67.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Griffiths LJ, Smeeth L, Hawkins SS, Cole TJ, Dezateux C. Effects of infant feeding practice on weight gain from birth to 3 years. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(8):577–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Baker JL, Michaelsen KF, Rasmussen KM, Sorensen TI. Maternal prepregnant body mass index, duration of breastfeeding, and timing of complementary food introduction are associated with infant weight gain. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(6):1579–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Pluymen LPM, Wijga AH, Gehring U, Koppelman GH, Smit HA, van Rossem L. Early introduction of complementary foods and childhood overweight in breastfed and formula-fed infants in the Netherlands: the PIAMA birth cohort study. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57(5):1985–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Papoutsou S, Savva SC, Hunsberger M, et al. Timing of solid food introduction and association with later childhood overweight and obesity: The IDEFICS study. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Besharat Pour M, Bergstrom A, Bottai M, Magnusson J, Kull I, Moradi T. Age at adiposity rebound and body mass index trajectory from early childhood to adolescence; differences by breastfeeding and maternal immigration background. Pediatr Obesity. 2017;12(1):75–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    van Eijsden M, Meijers CM, Jansen JE, de Kroon ML, Vrijkotte TG. Cultural variation in early feeding pattern and maternal perceptions of infant growth. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(3):481–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hof MH, van Dijk AE, van Eijsden M, Vrijkotte TG, Zwinderman AH. Comparison of growth between native and immigrant infants between 0-3 years from the Dutch ABCD cohort. Ann Hum Biol. 2011;38(5):544–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    de Hoog ML, van Eijsden M, Stronks K, Gemke RJ, Vrijkotte TG. The role of infant feeding practices in the explanation for ethnic differences in infant growth: the Amsterdam born children and their development study. Br J Nutr. 2011;106(10):1592–601.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bulk-Bunschoten AM, Pasker-de Jong PC, van Wouwe JP, de Groot CJ. Ethnic variation in infant-feeding practices in the Netherlands and weight gain at 4 months. J Human Lactation. 2008;24(1):42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    de Wilde JA, Meeuwsen RC, Middelkoop BJ. Growing ethnic disparities in prevalence of overweight and obesity in children 2-15 years in the Netherlands. Eur J Pub Health. 2018;28(6):1023–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    van Eijsden M, Vrijkotte TG, Gemke RJ, van der Wal MF. Cohort profile: the Amsterdam born children and their development (ABCD) study. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(5):1176–86.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Stronks K, Kulu-Glasgow I, Agyemang C. The utility of 'country of birth' for the classification of ethnic groups in health research: the Dutch experience. Ethnicity & Health. 2009;14(3):255–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Organization/UNICEF WH. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Peeters DLC, van Wouwe JP. Peiling melkvoeding van zuigelingen 2015. Leiden: TNO; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lanting CI vWJ. Peiling Melkvoeding van Zuigelingen 2005: Borstvoeding in Nederland en relatie met certificering door stichting Zorg voor Borstvoeding. Leiden: TNO;2006.

  41. 41.

    Fewtrell M, Bronsky J, Campoy C, et al. Complementary feeding: a position paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and nutrition (ESPGHAN) committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(1):119–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(9):660–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Statistics Netherlands (CBS). Level of education. . http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/methoden/toelichtingen/alfabet/l/level+of+education+1.htm Published 2016. Accessed.

  44. 44.

    C. P-L. Estimation of Extended Mixed Models Using Latent Classes and Latent Processes: The R Package lcmm. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.00890.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed 28-05-2019.

  45. 45.

    de Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, Rolland-Cachera MF. WHO growth standards for infants and young children. Archives de pediatrie. 2009;16(1):47–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Imai CM, Gunnarsdottir I, Thorisdottir B, Halldorsson TI, Thorsdottir I. Associations between infant feeding practice prior to six months and body mass index at six years of age. Nutrients. 2014;6(4):1608–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sun C, Foskey RJ, Allen KJ, et al. The Impact of Timing of Introduction of Solids on Infant Body Mass Index. J Pediatr. 2016;179:104–10 e101.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Huh SY, Rifas-Shiman SL, Taveras EM, Oken E, Gillman MW. Timing of solid food introduction and risk of obesity in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):e544–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Moss BG, Yeaton WH. Early childhood healthy and obese weight status: potentially protective benefits of breastfeeding and delaying solid foods. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(5):1224–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Toschke AM, Martin RM, von Kries R, Wells J, Smith GD, Ness AR. Infant feeding method and obesity: body mass index and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements at 9-10 y of age from the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children (ALSPAC). Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(6):1578–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Durmus B, Heppe DH, Gishti O, et al. General and abdominal fat outcomes in school-age children associated with infant breastfeeding patterns. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(6):1351–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kramer MS, Guo T, Platt RW, et al. Feeding effects on growth during infancy. J Pediatr. 2004;145(5):600–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Mihrshahi S, Battistutta D, Magarey A, Daniels LA. Determinants of rapid weight gain during infancy: baseline results from the NOURISH randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Grote V, Schiess SA, Closa-Monasterolo R, et al. The introduction of solid food and growth in the first 2 y of life in formula-fed children: analysis of data from a European cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(6 Suppl):1785s–93s.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Escribano J, Luque V, Ferre N, et al. Effect of protein intake and weight gain velocity on body fat mass at 6 months of age: the EU childhood obesity Programme. Int J Obes. 2012;36(4):548–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gunther AL, Buyken AE, Kroke A. Protein intake during the period of complementary feeding and early childhood and the association with body mass index and percentage body fat at 7 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(6):1626–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hopkins D, Steer CD, Northstone K, Emmett PM. Effects on childhood body habitus of feeding large volumes of cow or formula milk compared with breastfeeding in the latter part of infancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(5):1096–103.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sahota P, Gatenby LA, Greenwood DC, Bryant M, Robinson S, Wright J. Ethnic differences in dietary intake at age 12 and 18 months: the born in Bradford 1000 study. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(1):114–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Perrin EM, Rothman RL, Sanders LM, et al. Racial and ethnic differences associated with feeding- and activity-related behaviors in infants. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):e857–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Peneau S, Hercberg S, Rolland-Cachera MF. Breastfeeding, early nutrition, and adult body fat. J Pediatr. 2014;164(6):1363–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Stryjecki C, Alyass A, Meyre D. Ethnic and population differences in the genetic predisposition to human obesity. Obes Rev. 2018;19(1):62–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Gishti O, Kruithof CJ, Felix JF, et al. Ethnic disparities in general and abdominal adiposity at school age: a multiethnic population-based cohort study in the Netherlands. Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;64(3–4):208–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Cole TJ, Faith MS, Pietrobelli A, Heo M. What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children: BMI, BMI %, BMI z-score or BMI centile? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59(3):419–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. Bmj. 2006;332(7549):1080.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participating mothers and their children, and all other persons who contributed to the ABCD study: obstetric care providers, primary schools, students, and YHC centers in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

The ABCD study was supported by the following grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) TOP, 40–00812–98-11010, 40–00812–98–11010, 40–00703–98-11627, 92003489, 2100.0076, 85600004, 85800001 and the Netherlands Heart Foundation (Hartstichting) DHF-2007B103. PhD position of OS is partly funded by the Amsterdam Public Health institute (former EMGO+ Institute).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OS wrote the manuscript. MHH was responsible for the data analysis and reviewed the manuscript. TV provided essential materials and reviewed the manuscript. MAB, JS, JH and MRO were involved in designing the research, contributed to the interpretation of the results and critical review of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Outi Sirkka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ABCD study was approved by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, the Medical Ethical Examining Committees of all Amsterdam Hospitals and the Municipal Privacy Protection Committee of Amsterdam and was developed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

OS and MAB are employees of Danone Nutricia Research.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sirkka, O., Hof, M.H., Vrijkotte, T. et al. Feeding patterns and BMI trajectories during infancy: a multi-ethnic, prospective birth cohort. BMC Pediatr 21, 34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02456-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Infant feeding
  • Breastfeeding
  • Complementary feeding
  • BMI trajectories
  • Overweight