Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Towards evidence-based vitamin D supplementation in infants: vitamin D intervention in infants (VIDI) — study design and methods of a randomised controlled double-blinded intervention study

  • Otto Helve1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Heli Viljakainen1, 2,
  • Elisa Holmlund-Suila1,
  • Jenni Rosendahl1,
  • Helena Hauta-alus1,
  • Maria Enlund-Cerullo1,
  • Saara Valkama1,
  • Kati Heinonen3,
  • Katri Räikkönen3,
  • Timo Hytinantti1,
  • Outi Mäkitie1, 2, 4 and
  • Sture Andersson1
Contributed equally
BMC PediatricsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:91

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0845-5

Received: 11 March 2016

Accepted: 21 March 2017

Published: 29 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Vitamin D is important for bone mass accrual during growth. Additionally, it is considered a requirement for a multitude of processes associated with, for example, the development of immunity. Many countries apply vitamin D supplementation strategies in infants, but the guidelines are not based on scientific evidence and aim at prevention of rickets. It remains unclear whether the recommended doses are sufficient for the wide array of other effects of vitamin D. The VIDI trial performed in Finland is the first large randomised controlled study for evaluation of the effects of different vitamin D supplemental doses in infancy on:
  1. 1.

    bone strength

     
  2. 2.

    infections and immunity

     
  3. 3.

    allergy, atopy and asthma

     
  4. 4.

    cognitive development

     
  5. 5.

    genetic regulation of mineral homeostasis

     

Methods/Design

VIDI, a randomised controlled double-blinded single-centre intervention study is conducted in infants from the age of 2 weeks to 24 months. Participants, recruited at Helsinki Maternity Hospital, are randomised to receive daily either 10 μg (400 IU) or 30 μg (1 200 IU) of vitamin D3 supplementation. Both groups are assessed at 6 months of age for calcium homeostasis, and at 12 and 24 months of age for parameters associated with bone strength, growth, developmental milestones, infections, immunity, atopy-related diseases, and genetic factors involved in these functions.

Discussion

The study enables evaluation of short and long term effects of supplemental vitamin D on growth, immune functions and skeletal and developmental parameters in infants, and the effects of genetic factors therein. The results enable institution of evidence-based guidelines for vitamin D supplementation in infancy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01723852, registration date 6.11.2012.

Keywords

Allergy Asthma Bone development Cognitive development Immunity Infants Infections Vitamin D

Background

The biologically inactive vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) is produced in the skin after solar UVB exposure. It is bound to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and transported to the liver for conversion to 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-OHD), the most abundant circulating metabolite of vitamin D. In the kidney, 25-OHD is further hydroxylated to the active form calcitriol, 1,25-OH2D, that contributes to calcium metabolism [1]. Paracrine conversion of 25-OHD to calcitriol occurs in many tissues, such as dendritic and endothelial cells, brain, placenta and parathyroids, underscoring the importance of vitamin D for these organs [2]. Based on the number of cell types expressing vitamin D receptors (VDR), 38 potential target tissues have been recognised [3]. In target cells, calcitriol regulates the transcription of target genes, including several genes involved in cell cycle regulation [4]. Locally produced calcitriol in immune cells participates in host defence reactions and acts as a potent immunomodulator [2, 5]. In fact, vitamin D has been estimated to directly and indirectly regulate the expression of 2–3% of the human genome [4].

Both cutaneously synthesised and dietary vitamin D contribute to the circulating 25-OHD concentration. There is no consensus on the optimal 25-OHD concentration. In 2011, Institute of Medicine guideline stated that 25-OHD concentrations above 50 nmol/L are required for normal body functions including linear growth and bone mass accrual [6]. According to the Endocrine Society [7], for optimizing long-term health benefits such as the prevention of diabetes or fractures, concentrations above 75 nmol/L may be needed.

Vitamin D supplementation has been recommended in Finland for all infants since the 1940’s, but in line with the declining prevalence of rickets, the recommended doses have gradually decreased. The present Finnish Nutritional Council guidelines recommend 10 μg (400 IU) of vitamin D3 supplementation daily for all infants from the age of 2 weeks to 24 months, and 7.5 μg (300 IU) to children aged 2 to 18 years. Despite these recommendations, 20% of children were shown to be vitamin D deficient (<50 nmol/L) at 14 months of age [8]. In addition, we have previously shown that more than 70% of 195 apparently healthy school children in Helsinki, Finland, were vitamin D deficient (<50 nmol/L) during the school year [9, 10].

Role of vitamin D in health and disease

Growth and bone mineralisation

Serum calcium and phosphate concentrations are tightly regulated by parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 1,25-OH2D by negative feedback. Rickets is caused by insufficient vitamin D supply resulting in the lack of sufficient calcium and phosphate for bone mineralization at the growth plates [11]. The worldwide incidence of rickets is increasing [11]. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and an unfavourable bone development in children aged 6–16 years and in newborns [12, 13]. However, data on the relationship between vitamin D and BMD in children are somewhat contradictory. In healthy children aged 8–17 years with S-25-OHD levels above 50 nmol/L, no effect of vitamin D supplementation on BMD is seen [14], and the relationship between BMD and S-25-OHD is inconsistent in infants and young children [15].

In infants, severe vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L) associates with poor linear growth and delayed motor development possibly due to muscle weakness [16, 17]. In vitamin D deficient children, vitamin D supplementation improved growth velocity and prevented stunted growth [18, 19]. The increase in S-25-OHD concentration increased circulating IGF-1 level [18].

Infections and immunity

Rickets commonly presents with comorbidities such as continuous or recurrent respiratory infections [20, 21]. Vitamin D has profound effects on the immune system by promoting immune responses and inducing innate immune defences. Immune cells express vitamin D receptor (VDR) and respond to vitamin D [22, 23]. On innate immunity, vitamin D inhibits the expression of pattern-recognition receptors, induces autophagy in macrophages and induces endogenous antimicrobial peptides, such as cathelicidin. On adaptive immunity, for example, vitamin D acts by regulating the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from mononuclear cells and inhibits T-cell proliferation through decreased Th1 cytokine secretion [2426]. Therefore, vitamin D does not only have a role in modulating host defence to infections, but is likely to control factors in autoimmunity, also in allergic disease.

Vitamin D modifies response to both bacterial and viral infections [24, 27]. In adults, vitamin D insufficiency increases the risk of severe infections [28], but the results from intervention trials are conflicting [29]. Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to increased occurrence of lower respiratory tract infections in children [30]. In 167 Japanese children aged 6–16 years a supplemental vitamin D3 of 1 200 IU for a period of 4 months resulted in a significant reduction in influenza A infections [31]. In addition, vitamin D deficiency is associated with upper respiratory tract, gastrointestinal and ear infections in children [32, 33]. Identification, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency in early childhood may therefore have widespread health effects throughout childhood.

Allergy, atopy and asthma

In Finland, the prevalence of asthma among children aged 7–16 years is 7% [34]. Based on epidemiological studies, low maternal intake of vitamin D at pregnancy and low cord blood 25-OHD concentration have been associated with a higher risk for asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic eczema in the offspring, as assessed at 5 years of age [3538]. However, findings have not been consistent [39] and recent studies on prenatal vitamin D supplementation have not demonstrated an effect on wheezing at 3 years of age [40, 41]. Vitamin D may, however, have a protective effect against childhood wheezing and asthma, but the evidence is inconclusive [42]. In adults, IgE concentrations are higher for those adults with low or very high concentration of serum 25-OHD (S-25-OHD) [43].

Cognitive development

The association between concentrations of S-25-OHD and cognitive abilities has been widely studied among middle-aged and older individuals [4446]. Vitamin D trials are rare and they have not been able to support beneficial effects of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive functions among adults [47, 48]. Little evidence exists on the effects of vitamin D on the cognitive development among children and adolescents. Low concentrations of cord blood 25-OHD increased the risk for delayed mental and psychomotor development in 363 16–18-months-old children with severe vitamin D deficiency [49]. Surprisingly, also the children with the highest S-25-OHD concentrations had deficits in psychomotor development. However, S-25-OHD concentrations were not associated with cognitive performance in adolescents after controlling for ethnicity [5052]. Although preliminary results point to importance of early life exposure, the role of vitamin D in cognitive development during childhood and adolescence remains largely unstudied.

Genetic regulation of mineral homeostasis

S-25-OHD concentration has high heritability (28–80%), which explains differences in responses to vitamin D supplementation [53]. Genome-wide association studies on vitamin D insufficiency identified a number of common genetic variants that influence 25-OHD concentrations and the risk of insufficiency [54]. These included single nucleotide polymorphisms in the GC gene encoding vitamin D binding protein, locus near the 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase involved in vitamin D synthesis in the skin, and CYP2R1 coding cytochrome P450 responsible for 25-hydroxylation. We have studied GC polymorphisms in relation to vitamin D metabolism and bone strength in children [55] and observed differences in S-25-OHD and PTH concentrations between GC genotypes and that variation exists in BMD and bone strength index as well. The variation in S-25-OHD between GC genotypes suggests differences in vitamin D utilisation. Polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor gene VDR associate with growth pattern in infancy [56, 57] and with bone strength [58]. VDR polymorphisms together with vitamin D supplementation affect bone mineral accrual suggesting that vitamin D supplementation could be used to change the developmental trajectory and induce phenotype with lowered risk for chronic disease or disorder [59, 60]. Other possible candidate genes include CYP24A1 that encodes 24-hydroxylase initiating degradation of both 25-OHD and 1,25-OHD [54].

Overall aims and research questions

The aim of the study is to investigate long-term health benefits of early vitamin D supplementation with a dose ensuring effective concentration of 25-OHD.

The primary outcomes of the study are bone strength and cumulative frequency of infections at 24 months of age. We hypothesise that a higher vitamin D supplementation to infants between 2 weeks and 24 months of age will increase bone strength and decrease the frequency of infections.

Secondary outcomes of the study are occurrence of IgE mediated allergic symptoms, growth, motor, cognitive and social development, and associations of concentration and effects of vitamin D with polymorphisms of genes associated with its synthesis, binding proteins and degradation.

Methods/Design

Study design and setting

This is a randomised on-going controlled double-blinded intervention trial on children of 2 weeks to 24 months of age (Fig. 1). Vitamin D supplementation was commenced at 2 weeks of age and continued until 24 months of age.
Fig. 1

Study protocol. Methods are listed in Table 1 and further described in Additional documentation

This study is carried out at the Kätilöopisto Maternity Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (60°20,40’N). The hospital is one of three hospitals providing maternity services for the greater Helsinki area (a population of 1.5 million) with 8 000 births annually (15 000 in the whole greater Helsinki area).

Research team

The research team responsible for inception, implementation, and management of the protocol includes paediatricians, paediatric specialists in the field of neonatology, endocrinology, infectious diseases and immunology, psychologists, and nutritionists. The research team and the research nurses undertake recruitment, data collection, follow-up visits, and data entry.

Procedure and participants

A total of 4 980 infants were assessed for eligibility and 1 572 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Written information of the study was given to 3 408 families at the Helsinki Maternity Hospital 1–2 days after delivery from which 2 421 declined to participate. Altogether 987 healthy term newborns were recruited between January 2013 and June 2014.

The participating mothers were of Caucasian origin, without regular medication and with a singleton pregnancy. The infants were born at term (37 + 0 to 42 + 0 weeks) with a birth weight appropriate for gestational age (birth weight SD score between −2.0 to +2.0). Exclusion criteria for the infants were nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment for more than 1 day, intravenous glucose infusion, intravenous postnatal antibiotic treatment, seizures, duration of phototherapy for more than 3 days, and need for nasogastric tube for more than 1 day.

Girls (492) and boys (495) were randomised at recruitment in blocks of 50 to receive either 10 or 30 μg of vitamin D3 (400 IU or 1 200 IU, respectively) daily during the study period. Randomisation was performed by an external pharmacist and was blinded from the study group.

Vitamin D is administered once daily with 5 drops for both concentrations. The families received a study diary to record treatment compliance prospectively and empty vitamin D bottles are collected at follow-up visits.

Each family keep record of the child’s infections on a study diary throughout the study period. Data on allergic symptoms, growth, child’s motor and neurocognitive functioning, mental and behavioural health, social skills, sleep and diet are also collected. Furthermore, mothers report their own well-being at child’s birth (questionnaires given at recruitment) and at 12- and 24-month follow-up. Follow-up visits for the children are arranged at 6, 12 and 24 months of age at which blood samples are taken. Bone strength is measured with peripheral quantitative computer tomography (pQCT) at 12 and 24-month follow-up visits (overview of study follow-up and parameters in Table 1). During the visit the families meet a study nurse and have the possibility to meet with a paediatrician.
Table 1

Methods and timing of sampling. Methods are characterised further in Additional documentation

 

Birth

6 months of age

12 months of age

24 months of age

Vitamin D

x

 

x

x

Calcium and bone metabolism

x

x

x

x

Inflammatory markers

x

 

x

x

DNA

x

 

x

x

Bone densitometry

  

x

x

Infection records

 

x

x

x

Allergy questionnaire

 

x

x

x

Specific allergic responses (IgA, IgE)

  

x

x

Iron status

  

x

x

Dietary survey

xa

x

x

x

Neurological scales

  

x

x

Family sociodemographic and lifestyle

x

  

x

Neurocognitive development scales

  

x

x

Mental health and behaviour

x

 

x

x

Clinical assessment

 

x

x

x

Health records

x

x

x

x

Viral and bacterial swab

  

x

x

aretrospectively on maternal diet

A total of 875 participants have been to their 12-month follow-up visit (a drop-out of 112 children) and the 24-month follow-up visits are ongoing (to date, parents of 36 children have declined to participate in the 24-month follow-up visit, Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Study recruitment, adherence, and current phase of the study

Ethical considerations

An informed consent was obtained from the parents at recruitment. Previous intervention studies have evaluated the safety of substitution doses of up to 50 μg vitamin D in infants [61]. Safety was ensured by performing a pilot study for the proposed project: 113 children were randomised into three groups receiving vitamin D3 doses of 10, 30 and 40 μg daily for 3 months [62]. No hypercalcemia was observed in this study. Plasma and urine calcium concentrations did not differ between the three groups and in all groups the mean concentration of S-25-OHD reached at least 80 nmol/L, which was considered sufficient. Therefore, 10 μg a day was considered adequate and ethically sound to use as the dosage for the control group. While the group receiving 40 μg/day did not develop hypercalcaemia, their S-25-OHD reached levels higher than targeted. Dose of 30 μg/day was therefore chosen for the present study.

An external steering group was recruited to monitor the study and possible adverse effects.

The vitamin D3 supplements are prepared by Orion Pharmaceuticals (Espoo, Finland). The study is researcher initiated and independent.

The Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa has approved the study (ID 107/13/03/03/2012) and it is registered into ClinicalTrials.com (NCT01723852).

Study measures

An overview of study parameters is shown in Table 1. A full description of specific methods used in the study are presented in the online Additional documentation. In brief, the parameters used for the assessment of primary outcomes are as follows: bone parameters assessed with pQCT at 12 and 24 months of age, daily infection diary filled in by parents from 2 weeks to 24 months of age, and S-25-OHD at birth (cord blood) and at 12 and 24 months of age.

Data analyses

Differences between groups are tested with relevant statistical models, e.g., independent samples t-test, ANOVA and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Temporal change and difference between intervention groups of continuous variables (i.e., S-25-OHD) are assessed with repeated measures ANCOVA. Furthermore, multivariate and multilevel regression models adjusted with potential confounders are applied to explore associations between several outcomes when applicable.

Sample size

On the basis of sample size calculation for both of the primary outcomes, 400 + 400 study subjects, allowing for a 20% drop-out rate, a 0.2 SD difference can be detected with p at 0.05 and ß of 0.9. In bone mineral content, a 0.2 SD increase requires 210 + 210 subjects, and a similar increase in bone cross sectional area 297 + 297 subjects as measured by the same technique as here (pQCT) [63]. The annual rate of infections in children below 2 years of age is 6 (SD ± 1.6) [64, 65]. In the group receiving 30 μg of vitamin D we expect a decrease from 12 to 9 infections during the 24-month study period. A sample size of 220 + 220 is required to achieve statistical power.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest and most comprehensive randomised intervention study to assess the effects of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal and extra skeletal outcomes in infants. To date, epidemiological studies and randomised intervention trials have demonstrated conflicting results on, for example, the effect of vitamin D supplementation on childhood infections and on neurocognitive functioning. This may be due to difficulties in addressing the multiple confounding factors affecting the association between exposure and outcome. The present study, based on findings from a pilot study [62], is designated to specific hypothesis with adequate statistical power and duration. During the study, we gather data on infant diet at home and day care, psychological profiles and atopy-related symptoms using questionnaires. Results from this study will likely generate novel evidence-based information for improving vitamin D status among the paediatric population worldwide. By analysis of the impact of gene polymorphisms on the concentration and efficacy of the given vitamin D substitution it may create the basis for individualised dosage guidelines.

Limitations of the study

Compliance of the study subjects is always an issue in intervention trials. We are collecting used vitamin D bottles to evaluate the amount of vitamin D left after each cycle. These data, and parentally kept diaries on the use of vitamin D are used to evaluate the compliance in vitamin D intake.

Questionnaires may be improperly filled, resulting in missing data on, for example, parent-reported infections. Therefore, national registers can be used for the validation of caregiver data.

The results from a study performed in Finland cannot be directly generalised to other parts of the world. However, due to the randomised controlled study design our study will provide valuable data on the effects of vitamin D substitution in populations with variable vitamin D status. In addition, the study is designed to have control over the most common sources of vitamin D.

If the results from the VIDI-trial confirm the connections between the increased dose of vitamin D and the primary outcomes, the health benefits gained by a population-wide supplementation with higher vitamin D dose — a simple and low-cost intervention — are obvious. The first results of the VIDI-trial are expected in 2017.

Abbreviations

25-OHD: 

25-hydroxy-vitamin D

BMD: 

Bone mineral density

DBP: 

Vitamin D binding protein

S-25-OHD: 

serum 25-OHD

VDR: 

Vitamin D receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the families participating in the study. Also, we are grateful to the research nurses Sirpa Nolvi, Rhea Paajanen, Nea Boman, and Päivi Turunen for their assistance in data collection. Laboratory technician Sari Linden is acknowledged for her valuable contribution.

Funding

This study is being funded by the Governmental Subsidy for Clinical Research, Foundation for Pediatric Research, Finska Läkaresällskapet, Folkhälsan Research Foundation, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Stiftelsen Dorothea Olivia, Karl Walter ooh Jarl Walter Perkléns minne, and Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation.

Availability of data and materials

Data from the study are made publicly available in the main papers published from the study, or in their Additional file 1.

Authors’ contributions

The authors’ contributions are as follows: OH, HV, EH-S, KH, KR, TH, OM and SA designed the study; OH, HV, EH-S, JR, HH, SV, ME-C and TH conducted the research; OH, HV, KH, KR, OM and SA wrote the first draft of the manuscript; OH had primary responsibility for final content; all authors critically reviewed the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final version.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa has approved the study (ID 107/13/03/03/2012) and it is registered into ClinicalTrials.com (NCT01723852). An informed consent was obtained from the parents at recruitment.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital
(2)
Folkhälsan Research Center
(3)
Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Helsinki
(4)
Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital

References

  1. Christakos S, Dhawan P, Verstuyf A, Verlinden L, Carmeliet G. Vitamin D: metabolism, molecular mechanism of action, and pleiotropic effects. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(1):365–408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mora JR, Iwata M, von Andrian UH. Vitamin effects on the immune system: vitamins A and D take centre stage. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(9):685–98.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Norman AW. From vitamin D to hormone D: fundamentals of the vitamin D endocrine system essential for good health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(2):491S–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouillon R, Bischoff-Ferrari H, Willett W. Vitamin D and health: perspectives from mice and man. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(7):974–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hewison M. An update on vitamin D and human immunity. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;76(3):315–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ross AC. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(5):938–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Murad MH, Weaver CM. Guidelines for preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency revisited. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):1153–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Viljakainen HT, Korhonen T, Hytinantti T, Laitinen EK, Andersson S, Makitie O, Lamberg-Allardt C. Maternal vitamin D status affects bone growth in early childhood--a prospective cohort study. Osteoporosis Int. 2011;22(3):883–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pekkinen M, Viljakainen H, Saarnio E, Lamberg-Allardt C, Makitie O. Vitamin D is a major determinant of bone mineral density at school age. PloS one. 2012;7(7):e40090.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Soininen S, Eloranta AM, Lindi V, Venalainen T, Zaproudina N, Mahonen A, Lakka TA: Determinants of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in Finnish children: the Physical Activity and Nutrition in Children (PANIC) study. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(6):1080–91.Google Scholar
  11. Elder CJ, Bishop NJ. Rickets. Lancet. 2014;383(9929):1665–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Viljakainen HT, Saarnio E, Hytinantti T, Miettinen M, Surcel H, Makitie O, Andersson S, Laitinen K, Lamberg-Allardt C. Maternal vitamin D status determines bone variables in the newborn. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(4):1749–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayranpaa MK, Tamminen IS, Kroger H, Makitie O. Bone biopsy findings and correlation with clinical, radiological, and biochemical parameters in children with fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(8):1748–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Winzenberg T, Powell S, Shaw KA, Jones G. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on bone density in healthy children: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:c7254.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Cranney A, Weiler HA, O'Donnell S, Puil L. Summary of evidence-based review on vitamin D efficacy and safety in relation to bone health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(2):513S–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pettifor JM, Prentice A. The role of vitamin D in paediatric bone health. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25(4):573–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Soliman A, Salama H, Alomar S, Shatla E, Ellithy K, Bedair E. Clinical, biochemical, and radiological manifestations of vitamin D deficiency in newborns presented with hypocalcemia. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17(4):697–703.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Soliman AT, El-Dabbagh M, Adel A, Al Ali M, Aziz Bedair EM, Elalaily RK. Clinical responses to a mega-dose of vitamin D3 in infants and toddlers with vitamin D deficiency rickets. J Trop Pediatr. 2010;56(1):19–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar GT, Sachdev HS, Chellani H, Rehman AM, Singh V, Arora H, Filteau S. Effect of weekly vitamin D supplements on mortality, morbidity, and growth of low birthweight term infants in India up to age 6 months: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d2975.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Wayse V, Yousafzai A, Mogale K, Filteau S. Association of subclinical vitamin D deficiency with severe acute lower respiratory infection in Indian children under 5 y. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58(4):563–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Karatekin G, Kaya A, Salihoglu O, Balci H, Nuhoglu A. Association of subclinical vitamin D deficiency in newborns with acute lower respiratory infection and their mothers. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(4):473–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Di Rosa M, Malaguarnera M, Nicoletti F, Malaguarnera L. Vitamin D3: a helpful immuno-modulator. Immunology. 2011;134(2):123–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Khoo AL, Chai L, Koenen H, Joosten I, Netea M, van der Ven A. Translating the role of vitamin D(3) in infectious diseases. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2012;38(2):122–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Reinholz M, Ruzicka T, Schauber J. Vitamin D and its role in allergic disease. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42(6):817–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tiosano D, Wildbaum G, Gepstein V, Verbitsky O, Weisman Y, Karin N, Eztioni A. The role of vitamin D receptor in innate and adaptive immunity: a study in hereditary vitamin D-resistant rickets patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):1685–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hewison M. Antibacterial effects of vitamin D. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7(6):337–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ginde AA, Camargo Jr CA, Shapiro NI. Vitamin D insufficiency and sepsis severity in emergency department patients with suspected infection. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(5):551–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gradel L, Merker M, Mueller B, Schuetz P. Screening and treatment of vitamin D deficiency in the emergency department - is there a benefit for medical inpatients? Am J Med. 2015;129(1):116e1–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. McNally JD, Leis K, Matheson LA, Karuananyake C, Sankaran K, Rosenberg AM. Vitamin D deficiency in young children with severe acute lower respiratory infection. Ped Pulm. 2009;44(10):981–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Urashima M, Segawa T, Okazaki M, Kurihara M, Wada Y, Ida H. Randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation to prevent seasonal influenza A in schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(5):1255–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Science M, Maguire JL, Russell ML, Smieja M, Walter SD, Loeb M. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and risk of upper respiratory tract infection in children and adolescents. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(3):392–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Thornton KA, Marin C, Mora-Plazas M, Villamor E. Vitamin D deficiency associated with increased incidence of gastrointestinal and ear infections in school-age children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(6):585–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hugg T, Ruotsalainen R, Jaakkola MS, Pushkarev V, Jaakkola JJ. Comparison of allergic diseases, symptoms and respiratory infections between Finnish and Russian school children. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(2):123–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Erkkola M, Kaila M, Nwaru BI, Kronberg-Kippila C, Ahonen S, Nevalainen J, Veijola R, Pekkanen J, Ilonen J, Simell O, et al. Maternal vitamin D intake during pregnancy is inversely associated with asthma and allergic rhinitis in 5-year-old children. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39(6):875–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu X, Arguelles L, Zhou Y, Wang G, Chen Q, Tsai HJ, Hong X, Liu R, Price HE, Pearson C, et al. Longitudinal trajectory of vitamin D status from birth to early childhood in the development of food sensitization. Pediatr Res. 2013;74(3):321–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Baiz N, Dargent-Molina P, Wark JD, Souberbielle JC, Annesi-Maesano I, EM-CCS Group. Cord serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of early childhood transient wheezing and atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(1):147–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Chiu CY, Yao TC, Chen SH, Tsai MH, Tu YL, Hua MC, Yeh KW, Huang JL. Low cord blood vitamin D levels are associated with increased milk sensitization in early childhood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2014;25(8):767–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones AP, Palmer D, Zhang G, Prescott SL. Cord blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and allergic disease during infancy. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):e1128–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Chawes BL, Bonnelykke K, Stokholm J, Vissing NH, Bjarnadottir E, Schoos AM, Wolsk HM, Pedersen TM, Vinding RK, Thorsteinsdottir S, et al. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation during pregnancy on risk of persistent wheeze in the offspring: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(4):353–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Litonjua AA, Carey VJ, Laranjo N, Harshfield BJ, McElrath TF, O'Connor GT, Sandel M, Iverson Jr RE, Lee-Paritz A, Strunk RC, et al. Effect of prenatal supplementation with vitamin D on asthma or recurrent wheezing in offspring by age 3 years: the VDAART randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(4):362–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Riverin BD, Maguire JL, Li P. Vitamin D supplementation for childhood asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2015;10(8):e0136841.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Hypponen E, Berry DJ, Wjst M, Power C. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and IgE - a significant but nonlinear relationship. Allergy. 2009;64(4):613–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Balion C, Griffith LE, Strifler L, Henderson M, Patterson C, Heckman G, Llewellyn DJ, Raina P. Vitamin D, cognition, and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2012;79(13):1397–405.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Etgen T, Sander D, Bickel H, Sander K, Forstl H. Vitamin D deficiency, cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;33(5):297–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Annweiler C, Montero-Odasso M, Llewellyn DJ, Richard-Devantoy S, Duque G, Beauchet O. Meta-analysis of memory and executive dysfunctions in relation to vitamin D. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(1):147–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Dean AJ, Bellgrove MA, Hall T, Phan WM, Eyles DW, Kvaskoff D, McGrath JJ. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive and emotional functioning in young adults--a randomised controlled trial. PloS one. 2011;6(11):e25966.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Rossom RC, Espeland MA, Manson JE, Dysken MW, Johnson KC, Lane DS, LeBlanc ES, Lederle FA, Masaki KH, Margolis KL. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation and cognitive impairment in the women’s health initiative. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(12):2197–205.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhu P, Tong SL, Hao JH, Tao RX, Huang K, Hu WB, Zhou QF, Jiang XM, Tao FB. Cord blood vitamin D and neurocognitive development are nonlinearly related in toddlers. J Nutr. 2015;145(6):1232–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. McGrath J, Scragg R, Chant D, Eyles D, Burne T, Obradovic D. No association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level and performance on psychometric tests in NHANES III. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29(1–2):49–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tolppanen AM, Williams D, Lawlor DA. The association of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and calcium with cognitive performance in adolescents: cross-sectional study using data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25(1):67–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tolppanen AM, Sayers A, Fraser WD, Lawlor DA. Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) and D(2) with academic performance in childhood: findings from a prospective birth cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(12):1137–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Nissen J, Rasmussen LB, Ravn-Haren G, Andersen EW, Hansen B, Andersen R, Mejborn H, Madsen KH, Vogel U. Common variants in CYP2R1 and GC genes predict vitamin D concentrations in healthy Danish children and adults. PloS one. 2014;9(2):e89907.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang TJ, Zhang F, Richards JB, Kestenbaum B, van Meurs JB, Berry D, Kiel DP, Streeten EA, Ohlsson C, Koller DL, et al. Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2010;376(9736):180–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Pekkinen M, Saarnio E, Viljakainen HT, Kokkonen E, Jakobsen J, Cashman K, Makitie O, Lamberg-Allardt C. Vitamin D binding protein genotype is associated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and PTH concentrations, as well as bone health in children and adolescents in Finland. PloS one. 2014;9(1):e87292.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Morley R, Carlin JB, Pasco JA, Wark JD, Ponsonby AL. Maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and offspring birth size: effect modification by infant VDR genotype. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(6):802–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Bodnar LM, Catov JM, Zmuda JM, Cooper ME, Parrott MS, Roberts JM, Marazita ML, Simhan HN. Maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with small-for-gestational age births in white women. J Nutr. 2010;140(5):999–1006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Fang Y, van Meurs JB, Rivadeneira F, van Schoor NM, van Leeuwen JP, Lips P, Pols HA, Uitterlinden AG. Vitamin D receptor gene haplotype is associated with body height and bone size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(4):1491–501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Arabi A, Zahed L, Mahfoud Z, El-Onsi L, Nabulsi M, Maalouf J, Fuleihan Gel H. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms modulate the skeletal response to vitamin D supplementation in healthy girls. Bone. 2009;45(6):1091–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Molgaard C, Larnkjaer A, Cashman KD, Lamberg-Allardt C, Jakobsen J, Michaelsen KF. Does vitamin D supplementation of healthy Danish Caucasian girls affect bone turnover and bone mineralization? Bone. 2010;46(2):432–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Wicklow BA, Taback SP. Feasibility of a type 1 diabetes primary prevention trial using 2000 IU vitamin D3 in infants from the general population with increased HLA-associated risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;2006(1079):310–2.Google Scholar
  62. Holmlund-Suila E, Viljakainen H, Hytinantti T, Lamberg-Allardt C, Andersson S, Makitie O. High-dose vitamin d intervention in infants--effects on vitamin d status, calcium homeostasis, and bone strength. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(11):4139–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Ireland A, Ferretti JL, Rittweger J. Imaging of the muscle-bone relationship. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2014;12(4):486–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Denny FW, Collier AM, Henderson FW. Acute respiratory infections in day care. Rev Infect Dis. 1986;8(4):527–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wald ER, Guerra N, Byers C. Frequency and severity of infections in day care: three-year follow-up. J Pediatr. 1991;118(4 Pt 1):509–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017