Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in preterm and term neonates with gastroesophageal reflux

  • Ismael Lares Asseff1,
  • Graciela Benitez Gaucin2,
  • Hugo Juárez Olguín3Email author,
  • Jose Antonio Godinez Nájera1,
  • Alejandra Toledo López3,
  • Gabriela Pérez Guillé3 and
  • Fausto Zamura Torres1
BMC PediatricsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:90

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0630-x

Received: 26 April 2016

Accepted: 8 July 2016

Published: 13 July 2016

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of gestational age on pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in newborns with gastroesophageal reflux.

Methods

A prospective, descriptive and pharmacokinetic study was carried out in 30 pre-term and 20 full-term babies. 3 mg/kg of ranitidine was administered intravenously to all the babies and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h following the administration, samples of blood were drawn to assess ranitidine levels using high performance liquid chromatographic technique.

Results

Pharmacokinetics of ranitidine had a bi-exponential behavior with a half-life elimination of (t1/2el) 2.79 h, area under curve (AUC) of 1688 ng/mL, volume of distribution (Vd) of 1.44 L/kg, and clearance (Cl) of 5.9 L/kg/h. The median plasmatic concentration in pre-terms was 1113 ng/mL and 280 ng/mL in full-terms. Vd, t1/2 and Cl presented high values in preterm although the correlation of Cl with glomerular filtration in term newborns was better.

Conclusions

Plasma levels of ranitidine depend on the gestational age of the newborns. However, the possible relationship between after-birth age and pharmacokinetics of the neonates as their internal organs get matured without minding their gestational background.

Keywords

Gestational age Full-term Neonates Pre-term Ranitidine Pharmacokinetics

Background

Ranitidine decreases gastric acid secretion and improves esophagitis. It is then fundamental to have a good knowledge of its pharmacokinetic activities so as to make the best use of it in the treatment of every patient [14]. In normal newborns and infants, several organ systems progressively get matured to culminate in the later life and progressive maturation depends on the organ system and the specific iso-enzyme involved [5, 6]. In a study by Hedenström et al., [7], on pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in adults, it was found that the use of multiple dosing scheme of ranitidine has similar parameters as the use of single dosing scheme. Its concentration, following intravenous administrations fits to a bi-exponential kinetics. In nonates, the half-life elimination is almost 2 h, and it is a little more prolonged after oral administration [8]. Hepatic metabolism is one of the elimination route and this suggests that the drug has enterohepatic re-circulation for bi-exponential rate [9].

Due to the high risk of either overdosing or under-dosing in newborns, which could lead to either therapeutic failure or toxic effect, the study of pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in this group of patients is very important [1, 10, 11]. The absence of specific ranitidine dosing scheme for newborns has cornered physicians to use doses obtained by modifying the dosing schemes for older and mature children. The result of this is usually overdosing or sub-therapeutic dosing scheme.

In a study of pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in 27 full-term newborns without liver or kidney problems using 2.4 mg/kg of ranitidine, Fontana et al., [12], found that the half-life elimination (t1/2el) of the drug was 3.45 ± 0.31 h, the total distribution volume (Vd) was 1.52 ± 0.91 L/kg and the total plasmatic clearance (CL) was 5.02 ± 0.46 mL/kg/h. However, the above study did not consider preterm neonates. Assuming that these measurements do not change with different dosing schemes, they could be used to derive a treatment plan for newborn, since the age-specific pharmacodynamics could only be evaluated after knowing the age-specific pharmacokinetics.

In view of the above findings, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of gestational age on pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in newborns with gastroesophageal reflux to provide guidance on ranitidine therapeutic schemes for this age group.

Methods

A prospective, descriptive and pharmacokinetic study of 50 newborns (30 males and 20 females) receiving ranitidine at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), General Hospital, Durango, Mexico, was carried out with the objective of determining the pharmacokinetics of the drug.

All the patients, by medical prescription, required treatment with ranitidine. To avoid nephrotoxicity, serum creatinine and its renal clearance were determined as an inclusion criterion and once the values were confirmed to be normal, the patients were made to receive a first dose consisting of 3 mg/kg/day of ranitidine by slow intravenous injection (during two min) of multiple doses. A sample of 0.5 mL of whole blood was drawn from neonates at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h following drug administration, and were separated by centrifugation and stored for no more than 30 days at −80 °C until analysis. However during the validation procedure the samples assayed showed stability for at least 60 days.

During the study intragastric pH was registered by gastric aspirates. The research protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the General Hospital of Durango, México, and informed consent was obtained from the parent or guardian of each patient, according to principles of Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Acceptance into the study did not involve greater risks than those related to sampling. The volume was minimal and did not put at risk the balance or imbalance of fluids. The sample size was calculated using the formula reported by Castilla and Cravioto [13].

Pre-term and full-term neonates of 0 to 28 days old that required ranitidine treatment with normal liver and kidney functions were included in the study. All patients requiring treatment with ketoconazole or antacids agents were excluded.

Analytical procedure

Plasma ranitidine concentrations were analyzed using High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Agilent 1100 chromatographic system. The method was adapted from a previously published method by Castañeda et al., [14]. Quantification was carried out by using the ratio of area under the curve for ranitidine and nizatidine as standard internal calibration curves, and linearity was assessed in concentrations of 0, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000 and 1500 ng/mL for solution and plasma. A correlation coefficient of r = 0.999 was determined between intra and interday.

Mean accuracy of known concentration ranged from 99.4 to 103.5 %. Recovery was assessed by determining three concentration levels in plasma and solution (75, 600, and 1200 ng/mL). The minimal concentration that could be accurately measured was 15 ng/mL. A coefficient of variation (CV) of less than 7 % was obtained. The percentage of recovery was 108 %, which is within the range recommended by Official Mexican Standard [15]. The response of plasma samples, to which ranitidine had been added at the afore-mentioned concentrations was compared with the response of ranitidine solutions at the same concentrations.

To 200 mcL of plasma, 50 mcL of Nizatidine (internal standard) and 50 mcL of NaOH 2.5 M were added. The mixture was lightly shaken in vortex and then 3 mL of dichloromethane was added to it and shaken again for 1 min in vortex, and centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm. Once centrifuged, the organic phase was separated from the aqueous phase and air-evaporated at a temperature of 45 °C. It was then reconstructed with 200 mcL of mobile phase, and 50 mcL of this mobile phase was injected to the system [14]. A chromatographic symmetry C18 of 5 μm and UV detector with diode arrangement with flow velocity of 1 mL/min at a wavelength of 313 nm was used. For mobile phase, a mixture of monobasic potassium phosphate 0.05 M, pH 6.5 and acetonitrile (88/12, v/v) was used, with an injection volume of 100 mcL. The retention time of ranitidine was 2.82 min, 4.2 for IS and 6.5 as total chromatographic run time.

The pharmacokinetic profile of ranitidine was estimated in plasma concentrations obtained at different times [16]. Non-linear regression was used to fit plasma ranitidine concentrations to a two-compartment (bi-exponential) model [17]. The WinNonlin software (Version 2) [18], was used for all non-linear regression, and to generate all pharmacokinetic parameters. A similar analysis was performed with observations either in preterm or term cases.

Results

Fifty newborns that were admitted at Neonatology Unit of Hospital General de Durango, Mexico that required therapeutic management with ranitidine were studied. All newborns presented risk factors susceptible to digestive tract bleeding.

The characteristics of the patients based on gestational age were as follows: 6 pre-term babies (babies born before 37 weeks of gestation) and small for their gestational age (SGA) (weight < 10th percentile); 20 pre-terms, appropriate for their gestational age (AGA) (weight between 10 and 90 percentile); 4 pre-terms, large for their gestational age (LGA) (weight > 90 percentile); 7 full-terms (babies born between 37 and 42 weeks), small for their gestational age (SGA); and 13 full-terms, appropriate for their gestational age (AGA). Table 1 shows a comparative analysis of the statistically significant differences between gestational age and birth weight of preterm and term. It can be observed that the values in preterm newborns were much lower (Latin American consensus) [19].
Table 1

Demographic data of newborns whose pharmacokinetic of ranitidine were studied

Biological Characteristics

Females

Males

Statistical test

P value*

Preterm

Term

P*

n = 20

n = 30

n = 30

n = 20

Gestational age (weeks) Mean ± SD

34.2 ± 4.16

35.8 ± 2.7

2.76

0.103

33.6 ± 3.7

38.3 ± 0.9

0.0001

Birth weight (g) Mean ± SD

2330.7 ± 677

2680.5 ± 561

0.135

0.715

2361.9 ± 563.0

3000.8 ± 620

0.008

SD standard deviation

*Square Chi Test (X2)

The average value and standard deviation of the gestational age were 34.2 ± 4.16 weeks for female newborns and 35.8 ± 2.7 weeks for males (p = 0.103). However, even when the birth weights were different in the male and female newborns with average value of 2330.7 ± 677 g for girls and 2,680.5 ± 661 for boys, there was no statistically significant difference p = 0.715. In all the patients, there were no clinical signs or laboratory evidence of renal and/or liver dysfunctions. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the preterm as well as the term neonates are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in preterm (top line) and term (bottom line) neonates after intravenous dose of 3 mg/kg

Plasma concentration data were fit to a two compartment (bi-exponential) model after the applications of residual methods. The calculated pharmacokinetic parameters are reported in Table 2.
Table 2

Pharmacokinetic parameters after data adjustment for a model of two compartments for full population. Average ± standard deviation

AUC (Area under curve)

1688.9 ± 562.6 ng/mL/h

t½ of K10

1.69 ± 0.56 h

t½ α (Half life distribution)

0.3899 ± 0.129 h

t½ el (Half life elimination)

2.79 ± 0.93 h

K10 (Velocity constant)

0.9105 ± 0.34 h−1

K12 (Velocity of transference)

0.5395 ± 0.176 h−1

K21 (Velocity of transference)

1.76 ± 0.58 h−1

Vd (Volume of distribution)

1.44 ± 0.48 L/Kg

Cl (Clearance)

5.9 ± 1.96 mL/Kg/h

In Table 3, the median, minimum, and maximum values of plasma concentration of ranitidine of the newborns based on gestational age are shown.
Table 3

Median, minimum and maximum values of plasma concentrations of ranitidine (ng/ml) in newborns of both sexes, based on gestational age

Diagnosesa

No. of Cases

Values

Median

minimum

maximum

SGA Pre-term

6

518

197.66

937.6

AGA Pre-term

20

1484

61.20

7817.6

LGA Pre-term

4

1337

684.18

3687.9

SGA term

7

217

55.39

3080.7

AGA term

13

343

45.94

1075.7

a Classification according to Jurado García (15)

Although, the number of cases is different considering the gestational age, the highest number of subjects corresponded to AGA pre-term newborns (20 cases), and the least to LGA pre-terms (4 cases). These two groups presented the most elevated concentration values of ranitidine at zero hour with median value of 1484 ng/mL and 1337 ng/mL respectively.

In the case of intravenous single dose, the plasma concentration of ranitidine was ≥ 400 ng/mL in 34 (68 %) of the newborns. Concentrations within the normal therapeutic range (100–400 ng/mL) were seen in 11 (22 %) of the neonates while 5 (10 %) had concentrations below sub-therapeutic range (<100 ng/mL). The analysis showed statistically significant differences with X2 = 28.12 and p ≤ 0.01. There is a wide variation in the plasma concentration of ranitidine which decreases as the gestational age increases. This explains the variability in ranitidine plasma concentration in early gestational age.

Within the first 30 min, the pH value of all the patients was ≤ 4. There was an increase of > 5, with the intragastric pH being > 4 in a minimum of 15 h, which was registered during the study by gastric aspirates.

Discussion

Ranitidine is a drug used in the treatment of digestive tract bleeding, primarily in the upper segment, due to mucus alteration during neonatal stage. In addition, it is highly used in the prevention of gastric bleeding in neonates requiring therapeutic management in intensive care units. However, studies on PK of this drug in a risk group like newborns are very scarce. This is the basis justifying this study.

Fontana et al. [20], on studying PK values of ranitidine in term neonates reported t½el values of 3.45 ± 0.31 h; Vd, of 1.52 ± 0.91 L/kg; and Cl of 5.02 ± 0.46 mL/kg/h. Wiest et al. [21], on their part reported t½el values of 2.09 h; Vd, of 1.61 L/kg; and Cl of 13.9 mL/kg/h in neonates from 2 to 21 months of age. A comparison of Vd values in both studies with 1.6 L/kg reported in adults by Schaiquevich et al., [22], reveals that plasma protein binding and tissue distributions of this drug are similar in different age groups.

The value of t½el in the study of Fontana et al. [20], was more prolonged than that reported by Wiest et al. [21] (3.45 vs 2.09 h). Consequently, Cl was less (5.02 vs 13.9 mL/kg/h). In a study carried out by Mallet et al. [4], t½el value of 2.8 h was obtained in neonates of 6 weeks to 6 months old while in other studies made in older neonates by Zhang et al., [23] and in adult by Schaiquevich et al., [22], t½el values of 1.8 and 1.9 h respectively were reported. These evidentially depict that the most prolonged t½el value reported in newborns precisely reflects the lowest glomerular filtration velocity different from what is observed in older neonates where t½el values were found to increase in the first three weeks of neonatal life [24].

The use of ranitidine with other drugs in a disease such as gastro-esophageal reflux is common. Gastro-esophageal reflux is a common sickness of upper gastrointestinal motility that widely differs in severity and prognoses. The knowledge of ranitidine pharmacokinetics and other drugs that are usually combined with it for the treatment of this pathology is important, this would help to optimize the therapeutic benefits. Patients with gastro-esophageal reflux are usually elderly people and the pharmacokinetic variability in this group of population is evident. Moreover, the gastro-esophageal reflux, the basal pathology, is usually accompanied by symptoms and other pathologies that require medical management with other compounds. The ideal therapy for esophageal reflux should have a linear pharmacokinetic and a relatively longer plasma half-life (t½el), a duration that would permit its administration once a day, as well as a stable effect independent of its interactions with food, antacids and other drugs. In the present study, total clearance of ranitidine was well correlated with glomerular filtration velocity. An administration of ranitidine (3 mg/kg/24 h) for 72 h was reduced for 24 h, suggesting that in full-term newborns with stable hepatic and liver functions, the administration of ranitidine needs not be more frequent than 12 h, and that the treatment response must be monitored with repeated measurement of gastric pH and the doses adjusted in conformity with the response obtained.

This study would permit the determination and identification of ranitidine concentrations in newborn patients. Kuusela, [25] studied critically ill pre-term and full-term newborns to determine the optimum ranitidine doses through gastric pH monitoring. The same was investigated by Fontana et al. [12]. Their results showed that critically ill newborns were able to secrete intraluminal gastric acid, and that ranitidine concentrations correlated with gastric pH values ≥ 4. They concluded that a significantly lower dose of ranitidine is needed in pre-term compared to full-term newborns in order to maintain their intraluminal gastric pH over 4.

The prevailing adjusted doses on prescription of this drug for newborn patients have the disadvantage of either sub-therapeutic concentration levels or concentration levels with high risk of overdosing [26]. Therefore, the identification of these concentrations is of paramount importance if we want to get the maximum therapeutic benefit. The results of the present study suggest a modification in the treatment regimens in Neonatology service of General Hospital of Durango, Mexico, as was recommended in previous studies [27, 28].

Conclusions

Plasma levels of ranitidine depend on the gestational age of a newborn. At the same time, the results could contribute to a rational management of ranitidine.

It is inferred the possible relationship between after-birth age and pharmacokinetics of the neonates as their internal organs get matured without minding their gestational background.

Abbreviations

AGA, appropriate for gestational age; AUC, area under curve; Cl, clearance; CV, coefficient of variation; GA, gestational age; h, hour; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; LGA, large for gestational age; mcL, microliter; mL/min, milliliter per minute; NaOH, sodium hydroxide; NICU, neonatal Intensive care unit; PK, pharmacokinetics; SGA, small for gestational age; t½el, half-life elimination; t½β, bi-exponential half-life elimination; UV, ultraviolet; v/v, volume/volume; Vd, volume of distribution; μm, micrometer.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Cyril Ndidi Nwoye a native English speaker and language professor, for the critical review and translation of this manuscript.

Funding

No source of funding.

Availability of data and materials

Data about patients is available in the archives of Hospital General de Durango, Mexico. Analysis of results are available at Laboratory of Pharmacogenomic at CIIDIR in case any both data is required.

Authors’ contributions

ILA, HJO1,2,3,4,5, GBC and JAGN2,5, ATL, GPG and FZT2,3,5. (1) Contributed to conception and design. (2) Contributed to acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. (3) Critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. (4) Drafted manuscript. (5) Gave final approval.

Competing interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Consent for publication

All authors and affiliation institutions give their consent to publish the manuscript “Pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in preterm and term neonates with gastroesophageal reflux” in BMC Pediatrics. The written informed consent was obtained from patients, parents or care givers.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures in this study were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its amendments and the Ethical Committee and Institutional review board which approved the study.

Editorial assistance

The manuscript was edited by Taylor & Francis Editing Services.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Interdisciplinary Centre of Investigation for Integral and Regional Development, Durango Unit, National Polytechnic Institute
(2)
Pediatrics and Neonatology Services, General Hospital of Durango
(3)
Laboratory of Pharmacology, National Institute of Pediatrics, and Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico

References

  1. Thomson K, Tey D. Paediatric Handbook, 8nd ed. Wiley Blackwell. Melbourne: The Royal Children Hospital Melbourne; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Lauritsen K, Laursen LS, Rask-Madsen J. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (part 1). Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990;19:11–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Abad-Santos F, Carcas AJ, Guerra P, Govantes C, Motuenga C, Gomez E. Evaluation of sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in humans. J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;36:748–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mallet E, Mouterde O, Dubois F, Filpo JL, Moore N. Use of ranitidine in young infants with gastro-oesophageal reflux. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;36:641–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE. Developmental pharmacology-drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1157–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Allegaert K, Verbesselt R, Naulaers G, van den Anker JN, Rayyan M, Debeer A, et al. Developmental pharmacology: neonates are not just small adults. Acta Clin Belg. 2008;63:16–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hedenström H, Alm C, Kraft M, Grahnén A. Intragastric pH after oral administration of single doses of ranitidine effervescent tablets, omeprazole capsules and famotidine fast-dissolving tablets to fasting healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11:1137–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Madani S, Kauffman R, Simpson P, Lehr VT, Lai ML, Sarniak A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine and ranitidine in critically ill children. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.219.
  9. Boyce M, David O, Darwin K, Mitchell T, Johnston A, Warrington S. Single oral doses of netazepide (YF476), a gastrin receptor antagonist, cause dose-dependent, sustained increases in gastric pH compared with placebo and ranitidine in healthy subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:181–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hatlebakk JG, Berstad A. Pharmacokinetic optimization in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996;31:386–406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gschwend MH, Guserle R, Erenmemişoglu A, Martin W, Tamur U, Kanzik I, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of ranitidine film tablets in healthy male subjects. Arzneimittelforschung. 2007;57:315–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fontana M, Massironi E, Rossi A, Vaglia P, Gancia GP, Tagliabue P, et al. Ranitidine pharmacokinetics in newborn infants. Arch Dis Child. 1993;68:602–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Castilla LS, Cravioto JM. Simplified Statistics for Investigation in Health Science. 2nd ed. Editorial Trillas. México: Trillas; 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Castañeda G, Flores MF, Granados-Soto Y, Herrera-Abarca A, Pérez-Urizar J, Herrera JE, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral Ranitidine in Mexicans. Arch Med Res. 1996;27:349–52.Google Scholar
  15. Official Mexican Norm NOM-177-SSA1-1998, Guide that stats the rules, proofs,and procedures to show that any drug can be inter-change, and requirements that labs must to follow as third authorized to do assays. 1998, Health Minister, Mexico City, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  16. Anderson BJ, Allegaert K, Holford NH. Population clinical pharmacology of children: general principles. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165:741–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shimizu Y, Tamura T, Ono M, Kasai O, Nakajima T. Application of nonlinear fitting and selection of the most fitted equation by AIC in stability test of pharmaceutical ingredients. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28:931–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Win-Nonlin program, Standard edition, version 2.1. Mountain View, CA: Scientific Consultation Inc.; 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Boguszewski MC, Mericq V, Bergada I, Damiani D, Belgorosky A, Gunczler P, et al. Latin American consensus: children born small for gestational age. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Fontana M, Tornaghi R, Petrillo M, Lora E, Bianchi PG, Principi N. Ranitidine treatment in newborn infants: effects on gastric acidity and serum prolactin levels. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1993;16:406–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wiest DB, O’Neal W, Reigart JR, Brundage RC, Gillette PC, Yost RL. Pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in critically ill infants. Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1989;12:7–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schaiquevich P, Niselman A, Rubio M. Comparison of two compartmental models for describing ranitidine’s plasmatic profiles. Pharmacol Res. 2002;45:399–405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang Y, Mehrotra N, Budha NR, Christensen ML, Meibohm B. A tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous determination of acetaminophen, caffeine, phenytoin, ranitidine, and theophylline in small volume pediatric plasma specimens. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;398:105–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Thayyil S, Sheik S, Kempley ST, Sinha A. A gestation- and postnatal age-based reference chart for assessing renal function in extremely premature infants. J Perinatol. 2008;28:226–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuusela AL. Long-term gastric pH monitoring for determining optimal dose of ranitidine for critically ill preterm and term neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 1998;78:151–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gladziwa U, Klotz U. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of H2-receptor antagonists in patients with renal insufficiency. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993;24:319–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Juárez Olguín H, Lares Asseff I, Camacho Vieyra A, Pérez AG, Saldaña NG, Quesada AC, et al. Effect of severity disease on the pharmacokinetics of cefuroxime in children with multiple organ system failure. Biol Pharm Bulletin. 2008;31:316–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Juarez Olguin H, Buendia SE, Lares AI. Pharmacology during fetal and newborn age. Gac Med Mex. 2015;151:387–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement