Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Potassium urinary excretion and dietary intake: a cross-sectional analysis in 8–10 year-old children

  • Ana Catarina Oliveira1,
  • Patrícia Padrão1, 2,
  • André Moreira3, 4,
  • Mariana Pinto1,
  • Mafalda Neto1, 5,
  • Tânia Santos1, 5,
  • Joana Madureira6,
  • Eduardo de Oliveira Fernandes6,
  • Pedro Graça1, 7,
  • João Breda8 and
  • Pedro Moreira1, 9Email author
BMC Pediatrics201515:60

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0374-z

Received: 4 August 2014

Accepted: 5 May 2015

Published: 17 May 2015

The Erratum to this article has been published in BMC Pediatrics 2016 16:26

Abstract

Background

Data from studies assessing the intake of potassium, and the concomitant sodium-to-potassium ratio are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate potassium and sodium-to-potassium ratio intake in 8–10 year-old children.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was carried out from January to June 2014 and data from 163 children (81 boys) were included. Potassium intake was estimated by 24-h urine collection and coefficient of creatinine was used to validate completeness of urine collections. Urinary sodium and sodium-to-potassium ratio were also analysed. A 24-h dietary recall was used to provide information on dietary sources of potassium. Height and weight were measured according to international standards.

Results

The mean urinary potassium excretion was 1701 ± 594 mg/day in boys, and 1682 ± 541 mg/day in girls (p = 0.835); 8.0 % of children met the WHO recommendations for potassium intake. The mean sodium excretion was 2935 ± 1075 mg/day in boys and 2381 ± 1045 mg/day in girls (p <0.001) and urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio was 3.2 ± 1.4 in boys, and 2.5 ± 1.1 in girls (p = 0.002). The mean fruit and vegetable intake was 353.1 ± 232.5 g/day in boys, and 290.8 ± 213.1 g/day in girls (p = 0.101).

Conclusions

This study reported a low compliance of potassium intake recommendations in 8–10 year-old children. Health promotion interventions are needed in order to broaden public awareness of potassium inadequacy and to increase potassium intake.

Keywords

Potassium Sodium Children 24-h urinary excretion 24-h dietary recall questionnaire Fruit and vegetable

Background

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the main contributor to mortality and morbidity globally, killing more people each year than all other causes combined [1]. Because of the increasing prevalence of NCDs, dietary guidelines designed to promote public health have been instituted worldwide as an important part of national food and nutrition policies [2]. Interventions that are well understood, cost effective, and feasible could counteract NCDs [3], since the most health-promoting diets do not require extraordinary effort, cost, or complexity and provide the recommended daily allowances of macro and micronutrients [4]. Potassium (K+) is one of the key nutrients to prevent NCDs, and to preserve total body fluid volume, acid and electrolyte balance, and normal cell function [1, 3]. WHO suggests to adjust downward the recommended potassium intake of at least 3510 mg/day, based on the energy requirements of children relative to those of adults [1, 3]. Food rich in K+, such as fruits and vegetables [1], are recognized as key contributors to a healthy diet and are in line with food based dietary guidelines [57]. In addition, processed foods are often lacking K+ [1, 3].

Most NCDs are chronic diseases and have slow progression [8]. Although these diseases disproportionately affect adults, they are now being detected more frequently in paediatric populations, as well as their risk factors [3]. Furthermore, diet in childhood can be a significant determinant of adult dietary habits even after several decades [2, 9].

Major NCDs include cardiovascular diseases, cancers, chronic respiratory diseases and diabetes [8]. High blood pressure (BP) or hypertension [10, 11] is a major risk for cardiovascular diseases, especially coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure [3], and are of increasing concern in children and adolescents [12]. Primary hypertension probably has its onset in the first decades of life [13, 14].

Diet is believed to play an important role in hypertension [15, 16], especially one high in sodium (Na+) and low in K+ content [17]. The part played by dietary factors has been thoroughly studied [17]. Na+ intake has been the main topic, but most studies have been concerned with adults [13]. The association between high intake of Na+ and increase of BP [12, 18], as well as hypertension is well established [19]. Intake of Na+ is also associated with significantly increased risk of stroke and other cardiovascular diseases [2022]. A diet that includes modest salt restriction serves as a strategy to prevent or control hypertension and decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [12, 18, 20, 21, 23]. However, this issue is not consensual as some authors argue that blood pressure effect of sodium restriction on blood pressure can no longer be accepted as a surrogate for health outcomes [24] and both low sodium intakes and high sodium intakes may be reported has being associated with increased cardiovascular risk [25] and mortality [26].

The potential role of the intake of K+ on BP has received much less attention than sodium [27] although much evidence shows that increasing K+ intake has beneficial effects on human health [28]. It was reported that K+ intake was associated with a lower risk of stroke [3, 29, 30] and hypertension [4, 19, 31], since it lowers the BP [3, 27]. However, the evidence on the potential beneficial effect of increased K+ on cardiovascular disease is not entirely consistent [3], and confounding effects may arise from the interaction among various dietary electrolytes, in particular, the Na+/K+ ratio and other nutrients in K+ rich foods [13]. As Na+ consumption rises, increased consumption of K+ may be even more beneficial because, in addition to other benefits, it can mitigate the negative effects of elevated Na+ consumption on BP [32]. Furthermore, when people have an increased intake of K+, high intake of Na+ may not be associated with higher BP [33]. Also, regarding dietary intake, high consumption of fruit and vegetables, important sources of potassium, is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, particularly cardiovascular mortality [34] and stroke [35].

However, data from studies conducted in children are limited, particularly those which assess both the intake of Na+ and K+, and the concomitant ratio in health outcomes [1]. The available evidence suggests that increased K+ intake might reduce BP or at least prevent a deleterious rise in BP with age [36]. However, more studies are needed to verify the effects of K+ intake on BP and study its potential adverse effects in children [1].

The best method to estimate K+ intake is 24-h K+ excretion in urine, as the use of dietary surveys and food composition databases for estimating K+ intake may introduce either an over or underestimation of the actual intake [5, 3739]. Increased urinary K+ is reported to be associated with a lower body mass index (BMI), diastolic BP and heart rate, as well as lower stroke risk [30]. A better diet quality may also be associated with lower Na+ excretion and higher K+ excretion in six-year-old children [5].

Since K+ intake can be a predictor of overall dietary quality and can lead to beneficial effects on human health, we aimed to evaluate and provide information on consumption levels of K+ by 8–10 year-old school children, measured by 24-h urinary excretion, and assess dietary sources of potassium.

Methods

Study population

The cross-sectional survey, which was conducted between January and June 2014, included elementary school children (8–10 year olds), in Portugal.

To accomplish this project parents and caretakers of 488 children, attending the 3rd and 4th grade, were contacted in person. Details about the study were explained, including why the research was being conducted, what the study involved, the methods and procedures used, and the contact details for any necessary support. Participants were also informed that participation was voluntary and that they were able to withdraw at any time. All students and their parents received written information on the project. Of the 202 (41.4 %) children who agreed to participate, all collected a 24-h urine sample, but 33 (16.3 %) were excluded for incomplete 24-h urine collection according to the coefficient of creatinine (described in detail below). All the children (n = 202) responded to the 24-h dietary recall questionnaire, although six children were considered under-reporters (four girls) according to Goldberg cut-offs. Given that from these six children, five have already been excluded for not exhibiting valid urine samples, only one child was further excluded, remaining a sample of 168 participants. From these, five children (one with seven years old and four with 11) were also further excluded to narrow the age-range of the subjects, remaining a final sample of 163 participants (82 girls).

Prior data collection, parents provided written informed consent, according to the ethical standards laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and children gave oral assent. All schools, where the study was carried out, and the Ethical Committee of the University of Porto approved the protocol of study.

General data collection

Data collection was done through structured interviews, anthropometric measures, questionnaires, and collection of 24-h urine sample and 24-h dietary recall by trained researchers.

Socioeconomic variables

All parents and caretakers underwent a structured questionnaire to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, namely age and sex, and parental education level (recorded in 3 categories: 0–9 years; 10–12 years; >12 years).

Anthropometric measures

The collection of anthropometric data followed the standardized procedures [40]. Body weight measurement was obtained using an electronic scale (TANITA® TBF-300A, capacity 200 kg, accuracy 100 g) and the height was obtained using a stadiometer (capacity 200 cm, accuracy 1 mm) with the head in the Frankfort plane [41]. Participants wore lightweight clothing and no shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was computed as mass, (kg)/height2, (m). After calculating the BMI, it was plotted on the WHO BMI-for-age growth charts and obtained a percentile ranking, classifying children as: underweight (less than the 3rd percentile), normal weight (3rd to less than the 85th percentile), overweight (85th to less than the 97th percentile) or obese (equal to or greater than the 97th percentile) [42].

Physical activity

Physical activity was measured by a questionnaire sent to each parent or caretaker. This questionnaire included: the time spent watching TV/video during most days of the week (<2 h/day; and ≥2 h/day); sleeping duration (≤8 h/day; 9 h/day; and ≥10 h/day); and practice of sports activities besides the physical education classes at school (<2 times/week; 2–3 times/week; >4 times/week) [43].

Urine collection

Parents and caretakers were given both verbal and written instructions in assisting children to collect a 24-h urine sample and received a standard sterilized urine collection bottle. On the first morning of the urine collection, instructions were given to discard the first specimen, and from then on to collect all specimens for up to 24 h, including the first specimen of the following day. The samples were analysed by certified laboratories for 24-h creatinine (mg/day), 24-h urine volume (mL), 24-h sodium (mEq/day), and 24-h potassium (mEq/day). Urinary Na+ and urinary K+ were converted to mg/day (23 mgNa+ = 1 mmol Na+ or 1 mEq Na+; 39 mgK+ = 1 mmol K+ or 1 mEq K+) [44].

The 24-h urine collections were assessed for completeness using creatinine excretion in relation to weight (i.e. creatinine coefficient), calculated by the following formula:

\( Creatinine\kern0.5em coefficient = \frac{Creatinine\kern0.5em \left( mg/ day\right)}{Body\ weight\ (kg)} \). Creatinine coefficients above of 0.1 mmol · kg−1 · day−1 were classified as indicating an acceptable 24-h urine collection [45].

Dietary assessment

When participants delivered the 24-h urine collection, a 24-h dietary recall questionnaire [46] was filled, taking into account the Manual de Quantificação dos Alimentos [47]. Participants were questioned accurately about their food and drinks consumption, even reporting cooking methods, brands and consuming time and place. The software Food Processor®, (ESHA Research, USA) was used to convert food into nutrients.

To identify under-reporters, Goldberg cut-offs were used as direct comparison of energy intake (EI) to energy expenditure [48]. The Goldberg cut-off values were applied to exclude under-reporters, based on PAL (Physical Activity Level) and compared with the ratio of EI to BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate). BMR was calculated using the Schofield equations for children based on age, gender, height and weight [49].

While the principles of the Goldberg et al. [50] cut-offs still hold when assessing the EI of children and adolescents, appropriate age- and gender-specific cut-offs should always be applied in a pediatric population [51]. Therefore, according to the formulas proposed by Goldberg et al. [50], we calculated individual “CUTOFF 2” values using coefficients of variation for BMR of 8.5 %, coefficients of variation for EI (23 %) given by Nelson et al. [52], and published levels of light physical activity (1.55 for boys and 1.50 for girls for this age group) given by Torun et al. [53]. We used these estimated limits specific for age and sex instead of the single “CUT-OFF 2” for adults as proposed by Goldberg et al. Thus, records with EI:BMR ratios up to 0.95 for boys and 0.92 for girls were considered not plausible records. This result is in agreement with Sichert-Hellert et al. [54], although differences may occur due to the number of days of dietary assessment (one versus three days).

Finally, diet recall data was analysed and grouped in order to assess potassium rich foods consumption: milk and whey-based milk products; pulses; vegetables; fruit; and fruit and vegetables [55]. We also considered high and low intake of these food groups based on, respectively, intakes at or above the median, and below the median.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Package® 21.0 (IBM Corporation, 2012).

Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation, and percentiles, and categorical variables were summarized as counts and percentages.

Kolmogorov – Smirnov test was performed to test variables for normality. Independent samples t-test (parametric variables) and non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney U) were used to identify sex differences for sodium and potassium excretion. Categorical variables were tested using the Chi-square test. A univariate General Linear Model (GLM) was performed to identify sex differences for nutritional and dietary intake and we used the energy intake as a covariate, except for variables expressed as % of total energy intake (TEI) or g/1000 kcal.

We also used independent sample t-test, ANOVA, and GLM to investigate the associations between potassium excretion and participants’ characteristics (BMI categories, sports activities, television/video viewing and father’s and mother’s education), and food groups consumption, using energy intake as a covariate in GLM.

A p-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Table 1 shows the characteristics of participants. Half of the participants were eight years old, and nearly one third was nine years old.
Table 1

Characteristics of participants

 

Boys n (%)

Girls n (%)

p

Age (years)

8

40 (49.4 %)

46 (56.1 %)

 

9

30 (37.0 %)

24 (29.3 %)

 

10

11 (14.8 %)

12 (14.6 %)

0.570

School grade

3rd grade

47 (68.1 %)

50 (72.5 %)

 

4th grade

22 (31.9 %)

19 (27.5 %)

0.355

BMI categories

Underweight

2 (2.5 %)

4 (4.9 %)

 

Normal weight

46 (56.8 %)

46 (56.1 %)

 

Overweight

10 (12.3 %)

18 (22.0 %)

 

Obese

23 (28.4 %)

14 (17.1 %)

0.162

Sports activities (times/week)

<2/week

31 (45.6 %)

44 (61.1 %)

 

2–3/week

29 (42.6 %)

24 (33.3 %)

 

> 4/week

8 (11.8 %)

4 (5.6 %)

0.047*

Sleeping (hours/day)

≤8 h/day

23 (33.3 %)

16 (22.9 %)

 
 

9 h/day

26 (37.7 %)

29 (41.4 %)

 
 

≥10 h/day

20 (29.0 %)

25 (35.7 %)

0.374

Television/video viewing

<2 h/day

62 (91.2 %)

60 (93.8 %)

 

≥2 h/day

6 (8.6 %)

4 (6.3 %)

0.411

Father’s education

0–9 years

34 (57.6 %)

28 (45.2 %)

 

10–12 years

12 (20.3 %)

22 (35.5 %)

 

>12 years

13 (22.0 %)

12 (19.4 %)

0.175

Mother’s education

0–9 years

35 (53.9 %)

29 (45.3 %)

 

10–12 years

14 (21.5 %)

16 (25.0 %)

 

>12 years

16 (24.6 %)

19 (29.7 %)

0.623

*Calculated for categories <2/week and ≥2/week

Most children were within the normal range of BMI for age and sex (56.4 %), and no significant difference across BMI categories between sexes was found (p = 0.162).

Girls were significantly less involved in physical activities than boys (61.1 % of girls reported exercise <2 times/week versus 45.6 % of boys, p = 0.047). Sleep duration for less than 8 h/day was reported by 33.3 % of boys, and 22.9 % of girls. The proportions of children who spent two or more hours watching TV/video during most days of the week were 8.6 % in boys and 6.3 % in girls.

Nearly half of parents had attended school until nine years and only a small percentage completed 10–12 years or a longer school education.

The average K+ excretion was similar in both sexes (1701 ± 594 mg/day for boys and 1682 ± 541 mg/day for girls, p = 0.835). The average Na+ urinary excretion was significantly higher in boys (2935 ± 1075 mg/day vs. 2381 ± 1045 mg/day in girls, p <0.001), as well as the mean urinary Na+/K+ ratio (3.2 ± 1.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.1, in girls, p = 0.002). Table 2 summarizes descriptive data on Na+ and K+ excretion.
Table 2

Sodium excretion, potassium excretion and sodium-to-potassium ratio by sex

 

Sodium (mg)

Potassium (mg)

Sodium-to-potassium ratio

 

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

Percentiles

      

5

1495

1233

747

909

1.50

1.21

25

2093

1737

1297

1287

2.18

1.82

50

2737

2104

1658

1560

2.73

2.33

75

3749

2760

1979

2077

3.75

2.91

95

4996

4685

2982

2796

6.55

4.65

Mean

2935

2381

1701

1682

3.16

2.52

St. Deviation

1075

1045

594

541

1.42

1.05

Minimum

1150

1012

429

780

1.13

1.01

Maximum

6141

6647

3627

3003

8.18

6.94

p

<0.001

0.835

0.002

The overall mean energy intake was 2262 ± 555 kcal for boys and 2117 ± 547 kcal for girls (p = 0.098). Table 3 shows macronutrient intake and potassium rich foods consumption by sex, adjusted for energy intake.
Table 3

Nutritional and dietary intake by sex

 

Boys (n = 81)

Girls (n = 82)

p

 

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Energy (kcal)

2261.7

554.6

2116.9

546.5

0.098

Protein (%TEI)

16.7

3.5

18.1

4.5

0.050

Total fat (%TEI)

28.7

6.6

28.7

6.2

0.569

SFA (%TEI)

9.1

3.1

8.9

3.1

0.778

MUFA (%TEI)

10.4

3.1

9.9

3.2

0.555

PUFA (%TEI)

3.6

1.6

3.6

1.6

0.892

Total CHO (%TEI)

51.6

7.3

50.0

7.9

0.092

Sugarsª (%TEI)

19.4

6.4

18.7

7.4

0.427

Fibre (g/day)

16.1

5.8

16.8

8.4

0.094*

Fibre (g/1000 kcal)

7.2

2.4

7.9

3.1

0.160

Cholesterol (mg)

269.3

121.1

272.9

153.4

0.369*

Milk and whey-based milk products (g/day)

484.7

283.8

515.8

267.8

0.125*

Pulses (g/day)

24.0

99.1

22.5

55.0

0.941*

Vegetables (g/day)

153.0

138.3

114.4

120.7

0.078*

Fruit (g/day)

219.7

170.7

192.0

146.2

0.386*

Fruit and vegetables (g/day)

353.1

232.5

290.8

213.1

0.101*

CHO carbohydrates, SFA saturated fatty acids, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acids, TEI total energy intake

ªSugars refer to all monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods by the manufacturer, cook or consumer, plus sugar naturally present in honey, syrups, and fruit juices

*Adjusted for energy intake

Table 4 shows the relation between urinary potassium excretion and descriptive variables. After considering the mean urinary potassium excretion according to BMI categories, exercise, parents’ education, and time spent watching television/video viewing no significant differences were found for potassium excretion. Moreover, no significant differences were found for potassium excretion according to potassium rich food group’s consumption.
Table 4

Relation between urinary potassium excretion and descriptive variables

  

Potassium excretion (mg/day)

  

Boys (n = 81)

Girls (n = 82)

  

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

BMI categories

Underweight

1618.5

82.7

1540.5

622.0

Normal weight

1601.5

573.9

1644.1

577.1

Overweight

1924.0

826.9

1670.5

537.5

Obese

1807.0

534.5

1841.4

437.0

p

0.241

0.582

p*

0.248

0.373

Sports activities (times/week)

<2/week

1737.4

477.7

1663.7

520.5

2–3/week

1664.0

668.8

1666.8

652.4

>4/week

1359.4

652.8

1560.0

315.2

p

0.281

0.886

p*

0.200

0.259

Sleeping (hours/day)

≤8 h/day

1665.1

485.0

1642.9

386,0

9 h/day

1629.5

764.8

1710.4

682,8

≥10 h/day

1696.5

465.5

1648.9

497,9

p

0.805

0.765

p*

0.143

0.091

Television/

<2 h/day

1642.6

537.3

1664.7

557.3

≥2 h/day

1859.0

969.4

1911.0

565.2

p

0.440

0.261

p*

0.638

0.104

Father’s education

0–9 years

1673.6

407.3

1571.1

481.9

10–12 years

1960.6

616.2

1654.7

549.8

>12 years

1578.0

875.9

1547.0

509.1

p

0.271

0.800

p*

0.144

0.376

Mother’s education

0–9 years

1655.8

426.4

1540.5

451.3

10–12 years

1818.0

688.6

1881.8

499.1

>12 years

1716.0

774.1

1521.0

557.5

p

0.712

0.072

p*

0.612

0.784

Milk and whey-based milk products (g/day)

Lowa)

1684.6

14.8

1678.2

16.3

High

1693.8

21.8

1689.8

19.3

p

0.231

0.036

p*

0.373

0.060

Pulses (g/day)

Low a)

1689.3

18.8

1681.1

16.8

High

1688.1

20.3

1691.0

21.4

p

0.507

0.767

p*

0.476

0.944

Vegetables (g/day)

Low a)

1686.8

23.7

1682.6

21.7

High

1690.9

14.0

1685.9

14.0

p

0.587

0.301

p*

0.622

0.366

Fruit (g/day)

Low a)

1687.6

15.6

1683.1

19.2

High

1690.7

22.5

1685.1

18.3

p

0.955

0.178

p*

0.963

0.195

Fruit and vegetables (g/day)

Low a)

1689.0

23.5

1683.4

21.6

High

1689.0

15.2

1684.9

14.9

p

0.972

0.260

p*

0.890

0.299

*Adjusted for energy intake

a) Low and high refers to intakes below the median or at or above the median, respectively

Discussion

Average daily K+ intake in children was much lower than the recommended level in both sexes, and only 8.0 % of the children had a K+ excretion corresponding to an intake equal or higher than the recommended by WHO, considering energy requirements by age and sex, [1] which suggests a low diet quality. Accordingly, the mean consumption of fruit and vegetables was below the recommended intake level [56]. When comparing the urinary excretion of K+ with the corresponding level of the Dietary Reference Intake - Adequate Intake (AI) which is 4.5 g K+/day [57], we did not found any children above this level of intake.

The mean K+ excretion in the present study was 1681 mg/day. According to our best knowledge, only two studies [5, 14] addressed the K+ urinary excretion in school children, although none had studied children from the age range of the present study. Kristbjornsdottir et al. examined six year-old children and reported excretion of about 1210 mg/day [5] while Allison et al. who studied 3–5 years-old children showed a K+ excretion of 1000 mg/day [14]. Nevertheless, it is often challenging to compare values from studies on children, mainly due to the different nutritional requirements, [5] particularly when considering K+ recommendations depending on energy needs [5].

The mean Na+ excretion in this study was 2657 mg/day, and only 7.4 % of the participants had complied with the recommended by WHO, considering age, sex, and energy requirements. On the other hand, only 9.8 % of the children did not exceed the AI of Na+ [57]. Moreover 54.0 % of the children exceeded the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for sodium [57].

There is also a need to evaluate urinary Na+ and the Na+/K+ ratio considering their interrelated biological effects beyond their absolute levels of intake [7]. In this study, the mean Na+/K+ ratio was 2.8 ± 1.29. Although WHO do not address optimal Na+/K+ ratio, it is suggested that if recommendations of both Na+ and K+ consumption are achieved, the molar ratio of Na+/K+ would be approximately one to one, which is considered beneficial for health [1, 56]. In this sample, the mean Na+/K+ ratio was nearly three times higher than the favourable level for health, in line with other authors. A study conducted in southern Italy with subjects aged 2–16 years showed an average Na+/K+ ratio of 3.79 ± 1.68 [58] while in another survey with French participants aged 2–14 years the ratio was 1.64 [6]. Other studies showed that there is a low K+ and high Na+ intake in children [6, 59, 60] suggesting a low consumption of potassium rich foods.

In this study a high potassium excretion does not seem a marker of a healthy lifestyle since low levels of physical activity (p = 0.28 for boys and p = 0.89 for girls), high sedentary time (p = 0.44 for boys and p = 0.26 for girls) and body overweight status (p = 0.24 for boys and p = 0.58 for girls) were not significantly associated with urinary potassium excretion. Potassium excretion is not significantly higher in children that consume more fruit and vegetables, both for boys (p = 0.992) and girls (p = 0.721), as it would be expected. The difficulty in reporting accurately vegetable consumption specially in food preparations in which vegetables are triturated, such as soups (a staple item of the Portuguese diet), may contribute to explain this unexpected observation.

However, when assessing dietary intake, particularly on children and adolescents, measurements are prone to error reports, [2] namely inaccuracies in self-reporting, incorrect or incomplete food composition tables, missing data [37], attenuation from daily variation in nutrient intake [61] and mostly through under-reporting [62, 63] Although the seven days food record method had the highest correlation coefficients when compared with nutritional biomarkers [61], we performed a 24-h dietary recall to estimate major K+ rich foods intake, after excluding misreporters for energy. The estimated dietary potassium intake and urinary potassium excretion were in agreement, although their correlation was a weak positive one (r = 0.039), which may be explained by the inaccuracy in dietary reporting in children.

In this study, the intake of fibre was lower than the recommended [64], which may reflect the low contribution of K+ rich foods such as fruit, vegetables and pulses. The mean contribution of protein to total energy intake for boys and girls was above the recommended, while the mean contribution of carbohydrate to total energy intake for boys and girls was below the recommended range and the mean contribution of fat to total energy intake was within the recommended range for boys and girls [56]. Saturated fatty acids (SFA) was slightly higher than the recommended, while the mean energy intake from polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) was much lower than the recommended [65]. These results are close to other results described for Portuguese children [66, 67].

The high Na+/K+ ratio found in this study may also reflect the low proportion of children (33.7 %) who achieved the recommendation to eat at least 400 g of fruit and vegetables/day [56] which is in line with other studies [2, 68]. The importance of fruit and vegetables as sources of K+ [29, 35] raises the question of the inadequacy of food habits in children from a Mediterranean country, concomitantly with the consumption of too salty foods. However, social desirability and the possibility of these children not knowing some vegetables, fruits or pulses may also have affected the estimation of these items by the 24 h dietary recall used in our study.

The best way to increase K+ intake is to consume more fruits and vegetables [28] which could have other beneficial effects, besides increasing K+ intake, namely on antioxidants micronutrients and fibre [28, 35].

The results of this study point out the urgent need to develop and implement policies aimed at reducing Na+ intake and increasing K+ intake at this specific population and underscore the need for population-based interventions, such as consumer education, improvement of product labelling, changes in food production and restaurant offerings [39]. The evaluation of population current dietary Na+ and K+ intakes is needed to measure the success of future intervention strategies [19].

The main strengths of this study are the use of 24-h urine collection for the assessment of K+ and Na+ intake, as well as the Na+/K+ ratio, in accordance with WHO recommendations that the assessment of Na+ should be followed by the information of K+ [69]. Furthermore, the diet and nutritional intake estimated by the 24 h dietary recall are also presented in this report, providing information on K+ food sources, which may facilitate the design of preventive strategies.

There are some limitations as well. The fact that we only had one 24-h urine excretion per individual might be considered a limitation, as more than one collection may be needed for individual assessment of Na+ and K+ excretion due to day-to-day within-person variability of K+ intake. Another limitation is dietary assessment using the 24-h recall questionnaire due to the misreporting of food intake and the fact of not being too precise, what can cause bias to the results. In future surveys, it would be important to collect blood pressure data, given its possible relation with Na+ and K+ intake.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study reports a lower K+ intake estimated by 24-h urine excretion than the recommended for 8–10 year-old children. This data shows the need towards health promotion interventions to broaden public awareness in order to increase K+ intake.

Notes

Abbreviations

AI: 

Adequate intake

BMI: 

Body mass index

BMR: 

Basal metabolic rate

BP: 

Blood pressure

DRI: 

Dietary reference intakes

EI: 

Energy intake

FCT: 

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

NCD: 

Noncommunicable disease

PAL: 

Physical activity level

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This project received research funding from WHO and FCT (research project PTDC/DTP-SAP/1522/2012).

Disclaimer

João Breda is a staff member of the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The author alone is responsible for the views expressed in this publication and they do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of WHO.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto
(2)
Institute of Public Health – University of Porto (ISPUP)
(3)
Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto
(4)
Department of Immunoallergology, Hospital of São João
(5)
Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto
(6)
Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto
(7)
Directorate General for Health (Direcção Geral de Saúde)
(8)
Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Life-course, WHO Regional Office for Europe, UN City
(9)
Research Centre on Physical Activity and Health, University of Porto

References

  1. WHO. Guideline: potassium intake for adults and children. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2012.Google Scholar
  2. Kristjansdottir AG, Thorsdottir I. Adherence to food-based dietary guidelines and evaluation of nutrient intake in 7-year-old children. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(11):1999–2008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aburto NJ, Hanson S, Gutierrez H, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP. Effect of increased potassium intake on cardiovascular risk factors and disease: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ. 2013;346:f1378.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. McCarron DA, Reusser ME. Are low intakes of calcium and potassium important causes of cardiovascular disease? Am J Hypertens. 2001;14(6, Supplement 1):S206–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kristbjornsdottir OK, Halldorsson TI, Thorsdottir I, Gunnarsdottir I. Association between 24-hour urine sodium and potassium excretion and diet quality in six-year-old children: a cross sectional study. Nutr J. 2012;11(94):1475–2891.Google Scholar
  6. Meneton P, Lafay L, Tard A, Dufour A, Ireland J, Menard J, et al. Dietary sources and correlates of sodium and potassium intakes in the French general population. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(10):1169–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mente A, Irvine EJ, Honey RJ, Logan AG. Urinary potassium is a clinically useful test to detect a poor quality diet. J Nutr. 2009;139(4):743–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sinha-Hikim I, Sinha-Hikim AP, Parveen M, Shen R, Goswami R, Tran P, et al. Long-term supplementation with a cystine-based antioxidant delays loss of muscle mass in aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(7):749–59.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Mikkila V, Rasanen L, Raitakari OT, Pietinen P, Viikari J. Longitudinal changes in diet from childhood into adulthood with respect to risk of cardiovascular diseases: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58(7):1038–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J, et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet. 1990;335(8692):765–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360(9349):1903–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. He FJ, Marrero NM, Macgregor GA. Salt and blood pressure in children and adolescents. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22(1):4–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Geleijnse JM, Grobbee DE, Hofman A. Sodium and potassium intake and blood pressure change in childhood. BMJ. 1990;300(6729):899–902.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Allison ME, Walker V. The sodium and potassium intake of 3 to 5 year olds. Arch Dis Child. 1986;61(2):159–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Berry SE, Mulla UZ, Chowienczyk PJ, Sanders TA. Increased potassium intake from fruit and vegetables or supplements does not lower blood pressure or improve vascular function in UK men and women with early hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(12):1839–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Law MR, Frost CD, Wald NJ. By how much does dietary salt reduction lower blood pressure? I–analysis of observational data among populations. BMJ. 1991;302(6780):811–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hedayati SS, Minhajuddin AT, Ijaz A, Moe OW, Elsayed EF, Reilly RF, et al. Association of urinary sodium/potassium ratio with blood pressure: sex and racial differences. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7(2):315–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliott P, Stamler J, Nichols R, Dyer AR, Stamler R, Kesteloot H, et al. Intersalt revisited: further analyses of 24 hour sodium excretion and blood pressure within and across populations. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group. BMJ. 1996;312(7041):1249–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang Z, Cogswell ME, Gillespie C, Fang J, Loustalot F, Dai S, et al. Association between usual sodium and potassium intake and blood pressure and hypertension among U.S. adults: NHANES 2005–2010. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e75289.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Cook NR, Cutler JA, Obarzanek E, Buring JE, Rexrode KM, Kumanyika SK, et al. Long term effects of dietary sodium reduction on cardiovascular disease outcomes: observational follow-up of the trials of hypertension prevention (TOHP). BMJ. 2007;334(7599):885–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Strazzullo P, D’Elia L, Kandala NB, Cappuccio FP. Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. 2009;339:b4567.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang Q, Liu T, Kuklina EV, Flanders WD, Hong Y, Gillespie C, et al. Sodium and potassium intake and mortality among US adults: prospective data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(13):1183–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Aaron KJ, Sanders PW. Role of dietary salt and potassium intake in cardiovascular health and disease: a review of the evidence. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(9):987–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Alderman MH. The science upon which to base dietary sodium policy. Adv Nutr. 2014;5(6):764–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Alderman MH, Cohen HW. Dietary sodium intake and cardiovascular mortality: controversy resolved? Am J Hypertens. 2012;25(7):727–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Graudal N, Jurgens G, Baslund B, Alderman MH. Compared with usual sodium intake, low- and excessive-sodium diets are associated with increased mortality: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27(9):1129–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. van Mierlo LA, Greyling A, Zock PL, Kok FJ, Geleijnse JM. Suboptimal potassium intake and potential impact on population blood pressure. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(16):1501–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Beneficial effects of potassium on human health. Physiol Plant. 2008;133(4):725–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. D’Elia L, Barba G, Cappuccio FP, Strazzullo P. Potassium intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease a meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(10):1210–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Donnell MJ, Yusuf S, Mente A, Gao P, Mann JF, Teo K, et al. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion and risk of cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2011;306(20):2229–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Geleijnse JM, Kok FJ, Grobbee DE. Blood pressure response to changes in sodium and potassium intake: a metaregression analysis of randomised trials. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17(7):471–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Whelton PK, He J, Cutler JA, Brancati FL, Appel LJ, Follmann D, et al. Effects of oral potassium on blood pressure. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. JAMA. 1997;277(20):1624–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodrigues SL, Baldo MP, Machado RC, Forechi L, Molina MCB, Mill JG. High potassium intake blunts the effect of elevated sodium intake on blood pressure levels. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8(4):232–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang X, Ouyang Y, Liu J, Zhu M, Zhao G, Bao W, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2014;349:g4490.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Hu D, Huang J, Wang Y, Zhang D, Qu Y. Fruits and vegetables consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Stroke. 2014;45(6):1613–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Doria E, Buonocore D, Focarelli A, Marzatico F. Relationship between human aging muscle and oxidative system pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2012;2012:830257.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Leiba A, Vald A, Peleg E, Shamiss A, Grossman E. Does dietary recall adequately assess sodium, potassium, and calcium intake in hypertensive patients? Nutrition. 2005;21(4):462–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Huang Y, Van Horn L, Tinker LF, Neuhouser ML, Carbone L, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, et al. Measurement error corrected sodium and potassium intake estimation using 24-hour urinary excretion. Hypertension. 2014;63(2):238–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyer KA, Harnack LJ, Luepker RV, Zhou X, Jacobs DR, Steffen LM. Twenty-two-year population trends in sodium and potassium consumption: the Minnesota Heart Survey. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(5):e000478.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Sellen D. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee, WHO technical report series No. 854, vol. 30. Geneva, 1995: WHO; 1998. p. 452. Swiss Fr 71.00.Google Scholar
  41. Stewart AM-JM, Olds T. International standards for anthropometric assessment. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: ISAK; 2001.Google Scholar
  42. Growth reference 5–19 years. [http://www.who.int/growthref/who2007_bmi_for_age/en/].
  43. Moreira P, Santos S, Padrão P, Cordeiro T, Bessa M, Valente H, et al. Food patterns according to sociodemographics, physical activity, sleeping and obesity in Portuguese children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(3):1121–38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Bernstein AM, Willett WC. Trends in 24-h urinary sodium excretion in the United States, 1957–2003: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(5):1172–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Remer T, Neubert A, Maser-Gluth C. Anthropometry-based reference values for 24-h urinary creatinine excretion during growth and their use in endocrine and nutritional research. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75(3):561–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Gibney MJ, Lanham-New SA, Cassidy A, Vorster HH. Introduction to human nutrition. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.Google Scholar
  47. Marques M, Pinho O, Almeida MDV. Manual de quantificação de alimentos.Faculdade de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação da U. Porto (FCNAUP). 1996. 1ºEd.Google Scholar
  48. Rangan A, Flood V, Gill T. Misreporting of energy intake in the 2007 Australian children’s survey: identification, characteristics and impact of misreporters. Nutrients. 2011;3(2):186–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Schofield WN. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985;39 Suppl 1:5–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA, et al. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991;45(12):569–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Livingstone MB, Robson PJ. Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000;59(2):279–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nelson M, Black AE, Morris JA, Cole TJ. Between- and within-subject variation in nutrient intake from infancy to old age: estimating the number of days required to rank dietary intakes with desired precision. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50(1):155–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Torun B, Davies PS, Livingstone MB, Paolisso M, Sackett R, Spurr GB. Energy requirements and dietary energy recommendations for children and adolescents 1 to 18 years old. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50 Suppl 1:S37–80. discussion S80–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sichert-Hellert W, Kersting M, Schoch G. Underreporting of energy intake in 1 to 18 year old German children and adolescents. Z Ernahrungswiss. 1998;37(3):242–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Montenegro-Bethancourt G, Johner SA, Remer T. Contribution of fruit and vegetable intake to hydration status in schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1103–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. WHO. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;916:i–viii:1–149.Google Scholar
  57. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary reference intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  58. De Santo NG, Dilorio B, Capasso G, Russo F, Stamler J, Stamler R, et al. The urinary sodium/potassium ratio in children from southern Italy living in Cimitile: a case for concern. Int J Pediatr Nephrol. 1987;8(3):153–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kelishadi R, Gheisari A, Zare N, Farajian S, Shariatinejad K. Salt intake and the association with blood pressure in young Iranian children: first report from the middle East and north Africa. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4(4):475–83.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Morinaga Y, Tsuchihashi T, Ohta Y, Matsumura K. Salt intake in 3-year-old Japanese children. Hypertens Res. 2011;34(7):836–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A, Cassidy A, Runswick SA, Oakes S, et al. Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26 Suppl 1:S137–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Bingham SA. The use of 24-h urine samples and energy expenditure to validate dietary assessments. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59(1 Suppl):227s–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Jain M, Howe GR, Rohan T. Dietary assessment in epidemiology: comparison on food frequency and a diet history questionnaire with a 7-day food record. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(9):953–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  65. WHO. Fats and fatty acids in human nutrition: report of an expert consultation. FAO Food Nutr Pap. 2010;91:1–166.Google Scholar
  66. Valente H, Padez C, Mourão I, Rosado V, Moreira P. Prevalência de inadequação nutricional em crianças portuguesas. Acta Med Port. 2010;23(3):365–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Moreira P, Padez C, Mourao I, Rosado V. Dietary calcium and body mass index in Portuguese children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59(7):861–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Kristjansdottir A, Thorsdottir I, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Due P, Wind M, Klepp K-I. Determinants of fruit and vegetable intake among 11-year-old schoolchildren in a country of traditionally low fruit and vegetable consumption. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3(1):41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. WHO. Guideline: sodium intake for adults and children. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Oliveira et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.