This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Association of body mass index, sagittal abdominal diameter and waist-hip ratio with cardiometabolic risk factors and adipocytokines in Arab children and adolescents
© Al-Attas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 31 December 2011
Accepted: 31 July 2012
Published: 7 August 2012
Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) is a novel anthropometric measure hypothesized to be a surrogate measure of visceral abdominal obesity in adults. This study aims to determine whether SAD is superior to other anthropometric measures such as body mass index (BMI) and waist to hip ratio (WHR) in terms of association to cardiometabolic risk and circulating adipocytokine concentrations in a cohort of Saudi children and adolescents.
A total of 948 (495 boys and 453 girls) apparently healthy children with varying BMI, aged 10–17 years, were included in this cross sectional study. Fasting glucose, lipid profile, leptin, adiponectin, resistin, insulin, TNF-α and aPAI-1 were measured in serum and HOMA-IR was calculated. MetS components were defined according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria.
BMI was superior to SAD as well as WHR, and had the highest number of significant associations to MetS components and adipocytokines even after adjustment for age and gender, including blood pressure, lipids, glucose and leptin.
In conclusion, while SAD is significantly associated with components of MetS among children and adolescents, it is not superior to BMI. The use of SAD therefore may not be practical for use in the pediatric clinical setting. Follow-up studies are needed to determine whether SAD has clinical significance in terms of harder outcomes such as predicting diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular diseases.
Obesity confers increased risk for cardiovascular diseases as a result of accumulation of visceral fat, which alters intermediary metabolism and insulin sensitivity of peripheral tissues [1–5]. Conventionally, waist circumference is used in both clinical practice and biomedical research to measure abdominal obesity and to screen for the presence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). Other anthropometric indices, such as body mass index (BMI), as well as the waist-hip ratio (WHR), are two of the most commonly used non-invasive biomarkers of obesity.
While BMI remains the most popular obesity measure, its main disadvantage and limitation over waist circumference and WHR is that it does not take into account body fat distribution, a major predisposing factor to metabolic abnormalities. However, a novel anthropometric index that can rival WHR and waist circumference in clinical risk assessment is the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), considered a reliable surrogate measure of visceral abdominal fat, the fat tissue type that is significantly associated with cardiometabolic risk variables such as obesity, dyslipidemia and hypertension [6–8], measured non-invasively by a simple caliper .
While several reports have suggested that SAD is a superior correlate of MetS criteria and insulin resistance than waist circumference, there has been little incorporation of this measure into routine clinical practice [10–12]. Furthermore, SAD was recently suggested to be superior to waist circumference in predicting dyslipidemia and hyperglycemia, at least in overweight adults . The latter, measured at the level of the umbilicus, is modestly associated with coronary heart disease and visceral fat in males, at least in adults [4, 14]. To date, very few studies have correlated SAD to other metabolic abnormalities, especially in children. Furthermore, very few studies have examined whether SAD in children and adolescents is superior to other anthropometric parameters in predicting cardiometabolic risk factors, particularly in this peninsula where increased prevalence of MetS and chronic diseases have been observed in both children and adults [15–17]. Thus, the present study aims to determine the superior marker of obesity through comparisons of SAD, BMI, WHR in terms of association strength with metabolic risk factors and levels of circulating adipocytokines in a cohort of Saudi children.
A total of 948 (495 male and 453 female) Saudi children aged between 10 and 17 years, were randomly selected from the existing database of the Biomarkers Screening in Riyadh Program (RIYADH Cohort), a capital-wide study composed of randomly selected individuals from different Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) in Riyadh, KSA. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the College of Science Research Center, King Saud University (KSU), Riyadh, KSA. Written consent was obtained after study orientation. The study was carried out at the Biomarkers Research Program, KSU, Riyadh, KSA. A questionnaire focusing on demographic information and past medical history was given to all participating subjects. Children with acute co-morbidities that needed immediate medical attention were excluded from the study. MetS components were defined according to International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria .
Anthropometry included height (to the nearest 0.5 cm) and weight (to the nearest 0.1 kg), as well as waist and hip circumferences utilizing a standardized measuring tape in cm. The Holtain Khan abdominal caliper by Holtain Ltd (Crymych, UK) was used to measure SAD as previously described . In brief, each subject was examined supine on a firm examination table. Using sliding calipers with parallel blades a direct reading can be made between its lower arm (touching the subject's back) and its sliding upper arm (touching the front of the subjects abdomen). BMI was calculated as kg/m2 and systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements were obtained. The definition of BMI-based obesity employed is gender and age specific as proposed by Cole and colleagues , which provides cut off points for body mass index in childhood that was based on international survey and linked to the widely accepted adult cut-off points for overweight and obesity (BMI of 25 and 30 kg/m2, respectively).
Participating subjects were requested to return to their respective PHCCs after an overnight fast for anthropometry and blood withdrawal. Blood was transferred immediately to a non-heparinized tube for centrifugation. Serum was then transferred to a pre-labeled plain tube, stored in ice, and delivered to the Biomarkers Research Program in KSU on the same day. Fasting serum samples were stored in a −20 °C freezer until analysis. Fasting glucose (FG) and lipid profile were measured using a chemical analyzer (Konelab, Vantaa, Finland). Serum leptin, adiponectin, resistin, insulin, TNF-α and aPAI-1 were measured using a Luminex instrument (Linco Research Inc., USA). The intra- and inter-assay variations were 1.4-7.9% and < 21%, respectively for the above mentioned parameters measured using Luminex multiplex assay. Minimum detectable concentrations (MDC) were: leptin, 85.4 pg/ml; adiponectin, 145.4 pg/ml; resistin, 6.7 pg/ml; insulin, 50.9 pg/ml; TNF-α, 0.14 pg/ml, and aPAI-1, 1.3 pg/ml. hsC-reactive protein was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (Immunodiagnoztik AG, Germany) with an intra- and inter-assay variations of 5.5-6.0% and 11.6-13.8%, respectively. Serum angiotensin II was measured using human angiotensin II EIA kit (Phoenix pharmaceuticals, Belmont, CA, USA), (MDC 13 pg/ml; linear range 13–240 pg/ml) with intra- and inter-assay variations of 5.0-10.0% and < 15.0%, respectively. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as fasting insulin (μU/mL) times fasting glucose (mmol/L)/22.5.
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows, version 11.5). Data were expressed as mean plus/minus standard error. Group comparisons were done using one way Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA), with age and gender as covariates, and Bonferroni analysis post-hoc. Frequencies were expressed as percent (%). Partial (adjusted for age and gender) and bivariate (raw, unadjusted) correlation coefficients were determined and regression analysis was done to determine relations between variables of interest. Area under the curve (AUC) was done to reveal strength of associations elicited. P-values less than 0.05 were accepted to indicate statistically significant differences.
General characteristics of the study population
13.7 ± 2.2
Gender (Male/Female) (%)
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
22.1 ± 6.3
0.001*10-13 ± 1.0
Waist circumference (cm)
77.1 ± 20.5
Hip circumference (cm)
86.4 ± 19.8
0.91 ± 0.33
Sagittal Abdominal Diameter (cm)
17.4 ± 5.4
Sagittal Abdominal Diameter z-score
0.18 ± 0.67
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
106.4 ± 10.6
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
69.5 ± 7.8
5.1 ± 1.3
11.2 ± 1.2
2.6 ± 0.28
1.1 ± 0.60
Total Cholesterol (mmol/l)
4.2 ± 0.85
2.7 ± 0.76
1.1 ± 0.35
15.7 ± 2.8
20.4 ± 1.4
18.6 ± 1.7
ANG II (ng/ml)
0.67 ± 0.05
19.8 ± 2.4
C-Reactive Protein (μg/ml)
8.6 ± 1.0
Bivariate (Unadjusted) and partial (Controlled for Gender and Age) correlations of BMI, WHR and SAD to anthropometric and metabolic parameters
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
Total Cholesterol (mmol/l)
- 0.24 **
- 0.25 **
- 0.19 **
- 0.20 **
- 0.14 **
- 0.25 **
- 0.20 **
- 0.11 **
ANG II (ng/ml)
C-Reactive Protein (μg/ml)
Areas under ROC curve (AUC) of various anthropometric indices and metS risk factors
AUC ± SE
95% Confidence Interval
Systolic Blood Pressure
0.526 ± 0.040
0.513 ± 0.001
0.539 ± 0.048
0.721 ± 0.065
0.662 ± 0.069
0.634 ± 0.080
0.623 ± 0.019
0.535 ± 0.020
0.599 ± 0.019
0.615 ± 0.024
0.563 ± 0.025
0.554 ± 0.026
2 or more IDF MetS Components
0.777 ± 0.016
0.641 ± 0.019
0.678 ± 0.019
0.776 ± 0.025
0.632 ± 0.025
0.693 ± 0.029
The main finding of the present cross-sectional study is that BMI was superior to both SAD and WHR in terms of significant associations to cardiometabolic parameters in children. SAD was no better than BMI, despite significant correlations with MetS components, insulin sensitivity indices and adipocytokine concentrations. Earlier studies done among children of European and Turkish descent showed that BMI was a better predictor of WHR and skin folds, respectively, with SAD values reported only as a correlate to BMI among European children [21, 22].
Our findings however, differ from other ethnic groups, as waist circumference is more powerful in assessing metabolic disorders over other anthropometric values including SAD among Far Eastern children .
Our findings show that BMI is the best predictor of cardiometabolic risk factors as compared to SAD and WHR in children. With SAD however, some associations with cardiometabolic parameters remained significant even after adjustment for gender and age, notably blood pressure, triglycerides, and HDL-cholesterol. SAD also had more significant associations than BMI with regards to the adipocytokines suggesting that SAD may have a different predictive value independent of cardiometabolic risk factors. With the exception of HOMA-IR, these associations were not elicited with WHR. Furthermore, in terms of identifying adult patients with MetS, SAD, in the absence of imaging techniques, has a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 80% in patients at risk for cardiovascular events , and even more superior in assessing cardiovascular risk among the severely obese . It is noted however that the predictive utility of SAD among normal adults, and in this case, children, will be clearly less as compared to those who harbor known CVD risk factors such as obesity. In the present study, the significant influence of SAD on the expression of numerous adipocytokines makes it a better measure than WHR, but not as good as BMI, in assessing cardiometabolic risk profile in children. This is because when waist or hip circumference is measured in a standing person with an increased volume of intra-abdominal adipose tissue, all fat tissue is pulled towards gravity, and may therefore not be that accurate in assessing intra-abdominal fat especially among children who are very obese. When the same person lies supine the fat mass shifts cranially, causing anterior projection of the abdomen (abdominal height) which is measured by the SAD . It is the antero-posterior fat that seems to be important for the prediction of the MetS. The persistence of significant associations of lipids and selected adipocytokines with SAD agrees with the findings of several cross-sectional observations that SAD is the surrogate marker for visceral fat as compared to waist circumference [26, 27].
The authors acknowledge some limitations. The cross-sectional nature of the study limits our findings to observations and only prospective longitudinal studies can confirm whether the persistence of these associations translate into increased odds of developing chronic diseases. Pubertal status was also not assessed and this could have affected the results, since BMI, waist circumference, SAD and MetS itself can also be influenced by the developmental trajectories and hormonal changes occurring during adolescence, and excess adiposity during childhood could advance puberty in girls and delay onset in boys . Finally, the results cannot be generalized, as it may differ if applied to children of other ethnicities.
In conclusion, while SAD is significantly associated with several components of MetS, including adipcytokines in Arab children and adolescents, it is not superior to BMI in terms of association strength. The use of SAD, therefore, may not be clinically practical for routine use as compared to BMI, at least among children, but is more useful clinically when compared to waist-hip ratio. Prospective longitudinal studies are suggested to compare its causal association with harder endpoints such as early onset diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
This study was generously funded by National Plan for Science and Technology (NPST), (08-MED-614-02) Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors thank Mr. Benjamin Vinodson and Mr. Saim Ulhaq for the statistical analyses of the data.
- Larsson I: Human body composition: Reference data and anthropometric equations, the metabolic syndrome and risk. Intellecta Docusys AB Vastra Frolunda. 2005, 91 (628): 6508-0.Google Scholar
- Vague J: The degree of masculine differentiation of obesities: a risk factor for determining predisposition to diabetes, atherosclerosis, gout, and uric calculous disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1956, 4: 20-34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Canoy D, Boekholdt SM, Wareham N, Luben R, Welch A, Bingham S, Buchan I, Day N, Khaw KT: Body fat distribution and risk of coronary heart disease in men and women in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition in Norfolk cohort: a population-based prospective study. Circulation. 2007, 11: 2933-2943.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rexrode KM, Buring JE, Manson JE: Abdominal and total adiposity and risk of coronary heart disease in men. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2001, 25: 1047-1056. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801615.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rexrode KM, Carey VJ, Hennekens CH, Walters EE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Manson JE: Abdominal adiposity and coronary heart disease in women. JAMA. 1998, 280: 1843-1848. 10.1001/jama.280.21.1843.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gustat J, Elkasabany A, Srinivasan S, Berenson GS: Relation of abdominal height to cardiovascular risk factors in young adults: the bogalusa heart study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000, 151: 885-1891. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ivkovic-Lazar T: Current diagnostic methods of the specific distribution of adipose tissue. Med. Pregl. 2000, 53: 584-587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sampaio LR, Simoes EJ, Assis AM, Ramos LR: Validity and reliability of the sagittal abdominal diameter as a predictor of visceral abdominal fat. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2007, 51: 980-986. 10.1590/S0004-27302007000600013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mukuddem-Petersen J, Snijder MB, van Dam RM, Dekker JM, Bouter LM, Stehouwer CD, Heine RJ, Nippels G, Seidell JC: Sagittal abdominal diameter: no advantage compared with other anthropometric measures as a correlate of components of the metabolic syndrome in elderly from the hoorn study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84: 995-1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersson H, Daryani A, Riserus U: Sagittal abdominal diameter as a marker of inflammation and insulin resistance among immigrant women from the Middle East and native Swedish women: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2007, 6: 10-10.1186/1475-2840-6-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Anjana M, Sandeep S, Deepa R, Vimaleswaran KS, Farooq S, Mohan V: Visceral and central abdominal fat and anthropometry in relation to diabetes in Asian Indians. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 2948-2953. 10.2337/diacare.27.12.2948.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oppert JM, Charles MA, Thibult N, Guy-Grand B, Eschwege E, Ducimetierre P: Anthropometric estimates of muscle and fat mass in relation to cardiac and cancer mortality in men: the Paris prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002, 75: 1107-1113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pimentel GD, Moreto F, Takahashi MM, Portero-McLellan KC, Burini RC: Sagital abdominal diameter, but not waist circumference is strongly associated with glycemia, triacilglycerols and HDL-C levels in overweight adults. Nutr Hosp. 2011, 26: 1125-1129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Der Kooy K, Leenen R, Seidell JC, Deurenberg P, Visser M: Abdominal diameters as indicators of visceral fat; comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry. Br J Nutr. 1993, 70: 47-58. 10.1079/BJN19930104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Daghri NM: Extremely high prevalence of metabolic syndrome manifestations among Arab youth: A call for early intervention. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 40: 1063-1066. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02341.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas OS, Alokail MS, Alkharfy KM, Sabico S, Chrousos GP: Decreasing prevalence of the full metabolic syndrome but a persistently high prevalence of dyslipidemia among adult urban Saudis. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e12159-10.1371/journal.pone.0012159.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas OS, Alokail MS, Alkharfy KM, Sabico SLS, Chrousos GP: Diabetes mellitus type 2 and other chronic non-communicable diseases in the Central Region, Saudi Arabia (Riyadh Cohort 2): A decade of an epidemic. BMC Med. 2011, 9: 76-10.1186/1741-7015-9-76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zimmet P, Alberti G, Kaufman F, Tajima N, Silink M, Arslanian S, Wong G, Bennett P, Shaw J, Caprio S: International diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention of diabetes; The metabolic syndrome in children and adults. Lancet. 2007, 369: 2059-2061. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60958-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Daghri N, Alokail M, Al-Attas O, Sabico S, Kumar S: Establishing abdominal height cut-offs and their association with conventional indices of obesity among Arab children and adolescents. Ann. Saudi Med. 2010, 30: 209-214. 10.4103/0256-4947.62835.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000, 320: 1240-1246. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Larsson C, Hernell O, Lind T: Moderately elevated body mass index is associated with metabolic variables and cardiovascular risk factors in Swedish children. Acta Paediatr. 2011, 100: 102-108. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01969.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agirbasli M, Agaoglu NB, Ergonul O, Yagmur I, Aydogar H, Oneri T, Ozturk O: Comparison of anthropometric indices in predicting metabolic syndrome components in children. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2011, 9: 453-469. 10.1089/met.2011.0018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chuang SY, Pan WH: Predictability and implications of anthropometric indices for metabolic abnormalities in children: nutrition and health survey in Taiwan elementary children, 2001–2002. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 18: 272-279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoenig MR: MRI sagittal abdominal diameter is a stronger predictor of metabolic syndrome than visceral fat area or waist circumference in a high risk vascular cohort. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2010, 6: 629-633.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Guzzaloni G, Minocci A, Marzullo P, Liuzzi A: Sagittal abdominal diameter is more predictive of cardiovascular risk than abdominal fat compartments in severe obesity. Int. J. Obes. (Lond). 2009, 33: 233-238. 10.1038/ijo.2008.271.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asayama K, Dobashi K, Hayashibe H, Kodera K, Uchida N, Nakane T, Araki T, Nakazawa S: Threshold values of visceral fat measures and their anthropometric alternatives for metabolic derangement in Japanese obese boys. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2002, 26: 208-213. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801865.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pimental GD, Moreto F, Takahashi MM, Portero-McLellan KC, Burini RC: Sagital abdominal diameter, but not waist circumference is strongly associated with glycemia, triacilglycerols and HDL-C levels in overweight adults. Nutr Hosp. 2011, 26: 1125-1129.Google Scholar
- Burt Solorzano CM, McCartney CR: Obesity and the pubertal transition in girls and boys. Reproduction. 2010, 140: 399-410. 10.1530/REP-10-0119.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/119/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.