Skip to main content

Investigating colostomy-related morbidity in children following stoma formation and closure in a tertiary hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cohort study 2024

Abstract

Background

Overall, stoma-related morbidity affects a reported 20–38% of pediatric patients. However, determining the true incidence of major stoma-related morbidity is challenging due to limited cohort sizes in existing studies. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate colostomy related morbidity among children both after stoma formation and stoma closure.

Methodology

This is a retrospective cohort hospital-based study, conducted in an Abha maternity and children hospital, between August 1, 2018, and August 1, 2023, among 126 pediatric patients (aged 0–12 years) who underwent colostomy formation and subsequent closure during the study period. Data were collected from medical records. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v.26.

Results

This study included a total of 126 children who underwent colostomy. (N = 37, 29.4%) of cases included in this study were emergency cases, while (N = 89, 70.6%) were elective. A variety of antibiotics were used for surgical prophylaxis, metronidazole (77%) and cefuroxime (62.7%) were the most prevalent. Oral feeding was started after 5–6 days in more than one third of cases (39.7%). Wound infection (N = 15, 11.9%) was the most reported post-operative complication, followed with bowel obstruction (N = 6, 4.8%). Emergency cases had a longer duration of hospital stay than elective cases; this difference was statistically significant (P = .04).

Conclusions

Majority of patients reported no stoma related complications, while among those who reported complications, wound infection was the most reported complication, followed by bowel obstruction.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The formation of a stoma may become essential and life-preserving in infants and toddlers confronted with bowel perforation, necrosis, or obstruction [1, 2]. In such critically unwell pediatric cases, opting for a stoma creation over a primary anastomosis is often preferred to mitigate the potential hazard of anastomotic leakage.

Colostomies are indicated for a variety of reasons, which can either be congenital or acquired anomalies, although congenital conditions appear to be more prevalent [3]. Colostomies may be placed in either the transverse or sigmoid colon and can be fashioned as either loop or defunctioning (divided) colostomies.

The congenital indications predominantly include anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung’s disease (HD). However, the proportion of each condition as an indication varies across different publications, with some reporting HD as more common [4, 5], while others indicate ARM as more prevalent [6, 7]. The incidence of colostomy for HD is declining in certain countries due to early diagnosis and the increasing use of single-stage transanal pull-through procedures [8,9,10]. Nevertheless, the initial placement of colostomies remains high in environments like ours and other Low- and Middle-Income Countries where delayed presentations are still common [11,12,13].

Historically, there were numerous transverse and loop colostomies performed, but current practice appears to favor the creation of defunctioning and sigmoid colostomies [14, 15].

Stoma creation can lead to significant morbidity associated with the stoma itself, such as necrosis, stenosis, prolapse, and the development of incisional or parastomal hernias [16]. Moreover, in cases of ileostomies, excessive fluid loss can result in dehydration and failure to thrive [17, 18]. Overall, stoma-related morbidity affects a reported 20–38% of pediatric patients, encompassing both the initial stoma formation and subsequent closure [16]. However, determining the true incidence of major stoma-related morbidity is challenging due to limited cohort sizes in existing studies [2].

The identification of risk factors associated with significant stoma-related morbidity could facilitate the development of preventive strategies or potentially prompt modifications in surgical approaches. Previous research has highlighted a lower weight at stoma closure as a potential risk factor for postoperative morbidity in individuals treated for necrotizing enterocolitis [16]. However, conflicting findings exist, as some studies have failed to corroborate low weight as a significant risk factor for morbidity following stoma closure [18,19,20]. Furthermore, prematurity and underlying inflammatory conditions have been linked to stoma morbidity in certain studies [22, 23]. To establish more definitive and reliable risk factors, more cohort studies are warranted. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate colostomy related morbidity among children both after stoma formation and stoma closure.

Methods and materials

Study design

A retrospective cohort hospital-based study.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients, (N = 126)

Study settings and period

The study was carried out at a single location, the Abha Maternity and Children Hospital, from August 1, 2018, to August 1, 2023. This hospital, with a capacity of 240 beds, offers a wide range of specialties, including obstetrics and gynecology, pediatric surgery, neonatal ICU, pediatric ICU, and emergency services for women and children. The pediatric surgery department, one of the largest in the region, performs surgeries on children and newborns, as well as pediatric endoscopies. Last year, this department conducted over 1,350 surgeries, including 145 for newborns, addressing conditions such as diaphragmatic hernia, severed esophagus repair, open abdominal hernia, and intestinal obstruction.

Table 2 Indication of surgery, preoperative management, and intraoperative events, (N = 126)

Study population

The study was conducted among pediatric patients (aged 0–12 years) who underwent colostomy formation and subsequent closure during the study period.

Sampling technique and sample size

  • Simple random sampling was implemented in this study, where each member in the selected population was assigned a number and using a random number generator the numbers that were selected were enrolled in the study. Sample size was calculated using the formula:

  • The sample size was calculated by the equation of known population:

n = N / 1 + N(d^2).

n = sample size.

N = population (400).

d = level of precision (0.05).

n = 196.

  • Sample size is 196.

Data Collection Tools

The following information were collected from medical records: Demographic information (age, sex), diagnosis and indication for colostomy ( Emergency or elective ), preoperative management (nutritional support, bowel preparation), details of colostomy formation and closure surgeries (surgical type, intraoperative complications, operative length), postoperative management (antibiotic use, time to oral feeding), complications related to colostomy formation and closure (acute, chronic, stoma-related complications, bowel obstruction, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, etc.), length of hospital stay, readmissions and reoperations.

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. Descriptive statistics were employed, with categorical data presented as frequencies (n) and percentages (%). The chi-square test was utilized to examine correlations between variables.

Results

Baseline characteristics of patients

This study included a total of 126 children who underwent colostomy, majority of patients were under 2 years (79.4%), males were slightly more than females (51.6% and 48.4%) respectively (Table 1).

Indications and preoperative management

(N = 37, 29.4%) of cases included in this study were emergency cases, while (N = 89, 70.6%) were elective. In regard to preoperative management; (65.1%) received nutritional support TPN (1 / 2), (70.6%) underwent bowel preparation by mechanical protocol (Pico-Salax/Purg-Odan with 150mL (5oz) cold water) 1/ 2 (Table 2).

Table 3 Length of hospital stay, post-operative management, readmission and reoperation, (N = 126)

Details of colostomy formation and closure surgery

More than half (58.7%) of surgeries were closure, while (41.3%) were creation colostomies.

Intraoperative complications and operative length

No intraoperative complications reported among patients, almost one third of operations (35.7%) lasted for more than 120 min, (25.4%) lasted for 61–90 min, and (3.2%) lasted for less than 30 min (Table 3).

Post-operative management

A variety of antibiotics used postoperatively, metronidazole (77%) and cefuroxime (62.7%) were the most prevalent. Oral feeding started after an average of 4.2 days postoperatively (± 2.3 SD).

Complications related to colostomy formation and closure

Wound infection (N = 15, 11.9%) was the most reported complication, followed with bowel obstruction (N = 6, 4.8%), while no complications reported in (N = 100, 79.4%) of patients. More than half of cases (57.9%) stayed at hospital for 8–14 days.

Readmission and reoperation

(N = 13, 10.3%) readmitted to hospital after discharge, intestinal obstruction (33.3%), and wound infection (25%) were the most common causes for readmission. (N = 10, 7.9%) re-operated, exploratory laparotomy (40%) was the most reported cause for reoperation, overall (61.5%) of those which were readmitted were re-operated.

Factors associated with post-operative complications, readmission and reoperation

None of basic characteristics of patients, preoperative or post-operative management was associated with development of post-operative complications (P > .05) (Table 4). Regarding readmission of patients; administration of nutritional support TPN was associated with a higher percent of complications (P = .03), no factors were found to be significantly associated with reoperations of patients (P > .05) (Table 5).

Factors associated with length of hospital stay

Emergency cases had a longer duration of hospital stay than elective cases; (29.7% stayed more than 14 days in compare to 12.4%) this difference was statistically significant (P = .04), patients who received nutritional support, and patients who didn’t undergo bowel preparation by mechanical protocol had a significantly longer duration of stay (Table 6).

Discussion

This study aimed to investigate colostomy related morbidity among children both after stoma formation and stoma closure. A total of 126 children who underwent colostomy were enrolled in this study, out of which, the majority were under 2 years (79.4%), and males were slightly more than females (51.6% and 48.4%) respectively. The study found that the majority of patients reported no stoma related complications, while among those who reported complications, wound infection was the most reported complication, followed by bowel obstruction.

Table 4 Factors associated with post-operative complications, (N = 126)

Analysis revealed that more than half (65.1%) received nutritional support TPN, (70.6%) underwent bowel preparation by mechanical protocol. TPN is critical for patients with stomas, as it provides essential nutrients and fluids that may be lost due to the stoma. The mechanical bowel preparation is also important to ensure a clean surgical field and reduce the risk of infection. Malnutrition resulting from the loss of nutrients and fluids through a stoma can have detrimental effects on both growth and cognitive development [24, 25]. Reports indicate that as many as 90% of young children with stomas experience a decline in their growth chart, prompting some experts to recommend early closure of the stoma [26, 27]. This recommendation is bolstered by evidence demonstrating that the majority of young children show improved growth following stoma closure, regardless of any associated morbidity, weight concerns, or underlying conditions [26].

Table 5 Factors associated with readmission and reoperation, (N = 126)

Results showed that a variety of antibiotics were used postoperatively, with metronidazole (77%) and cefuroxime (62.7%) being the most prevalent, and oral feeding was initiated after 5–6 days in more than one third of cases (39.7%). A previous prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare the outcomes of administering prophylactic antibiotics for one day versus seven days to 30 consecutive patients undergoing colostomy closure. The antibiotics utilized were cotrimoxazole (8 mg/kg per day trimethoprim) and ornidazole (20 mg/kg per day). The use of prophylactic antibiotics is standard practice to prevent postoperative infections, especially in patients undergoing procedures involving the bowel. The choice of antibiotics reflects common protocols aimed at covering a broad spectrum of potential pathogens. Mechanical bowel cleansing and operative procedures were standardized for all patients. Wound infections limited to the subcutaneous tissue were observed in two patients, one in each group (6.6%). No instances of intraperitoneal infection, anastomotic leakage/dehiscence, or wound dehiscence were encountered [28].

Table 6 Factors associated with length of hospital stay, (N = 126)

Majority of patients reported no complications (79.4%), while on those who reported complications, wound infection (11.9%) was the most reported complication, followed by bowel obstruction (4.8%). A similar study reported that following stoma formation/closure, 27% of the young children experienced complications, mainly consisting of high output stoma, prolapse, stoma stenosis or adhesive obstructions [29]. Another case-control study found that complications following colostomy closure occurred in 17 children and include wound infection (11 cases), stitch granuloma (5 cases), and 2 cases each of small bowel obstruction and incisional hernia. These were not related to the duration of the colostomy [30]. This high rate of no complications is encouraging and suggests effective surgical techniques and postoperative care. However, the reported complications, particularly wound infections, highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and management.

(10.3%) were readmitted to hospital after discharge, and (7.9%) were re-operated. Intestinal obstruction (33.3%), and wound infection (25%) were the most common causes for readmission, while exploratory laparotomy (20%) and intestinal obstruction (20%) were the most reported causes for reoperation. Readmission rates are an important quality metric in postoperative care. The identified causes of readmission highlight areas where preventive measures could be implemented, such as better management of wound care and monitoring for signs of obstruction. Regarding readmission of patients; administration of nutritional support TPN was associated with a higher percent of complications (P = .03). This finding is intriguing, as it suggests that while TPN is necessary for managing malnutrition, it may also be linked to increased complications. This could be due to factors such as the underlying conditions necessitating TPN, or potential complications arising from the TPN itself, such as infections related to central venous catheters.

Limited number of Saudi studies were published in this scope; hence this study is considered a valuable base for evidence. Another strength of this study is that it included participants from variable demographical background and socio-economic status, which would aid the authorities in dealing with the issue from all aspects. Furthermore, this study is to pave the way as the base for further studies in this aspect. The study was not without limitations. The fact that it was done within a specific setting may have determined a highly selected group of cases. It may therefore be difficult to generalize the findings to the total community of children who underwent colostomy in the kingdom, larger numbers of respondents would have improved the statistical significance of the results. In addition, the retrospective design might have led to underreporting of morbidity.

Conclusion

Majority of patients reported no stoma related complications, while among those who reported complications, wound infection was the most reported complication, followed by bowel obstruction. Regarding readmission of patients; administration of nutritional support TPN was associated with a higher percent of complications (P = .03). Serial and frequent studies on the issue should be conducted and funded to generate more evidence and data regarding this topic. Webinars, medical workshops and conferences should be held to discuss these morbidities and arrange measures to decrease their incidence.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to issues of privacy.

Abbreviations

ARM:

Anorectal malformation

HD:

Hirschsprung’s disease

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

TPN:

Total parenteral nutrition

References

  1. Hunter CJ, Chokshi N, Ford HR. Evidence vs experience in the surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis and focal intestinal perforation. J Perinatol. 2008;28(Suppl 1):S14–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Steinau G, et al. Enterostomy complications in infancy and childhood. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;386(5):346–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Massenga A, Chibwae A, Nuri AA, Bugimbi M, Munisi YK, Mfinanga R, et al. Indications for and complications of intestinal stomas in the children and adults at a tertiary care hospital in a resource-limited setting: a Tanzanian experience. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1070-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ameh EA, Mshelbwala PM, Sabiu L, Chirdan LB. Colostomy in children–an evaluation of acceptance among mothers and caregivers in a developing country. S Afr J Surg. 2006;44(4):138–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nour S, Beck J, Stringer MD. Colostomy complications in infants and children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996;78(6):526–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Muzira A, Kakembo N, Kisa P, et al. The socioeconomic impact of a pediatric ostomy in Uganda: a pilot study. Pediatr Surg Int. 2018;34(4):457–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4230-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Soomro BA, Solangi RA, Siddiqui MA. Colostomy in children: indications and complications. Pak J Med Sci. 2010;26(4):883–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giuliani S, Honeyford K, Chang CY, et al. Outcomes of primary versus multiple-staged repair in Hirschsprung’s Disease in England. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2020;30(1):104–10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nouira F, Ben Ahmed Y, Sarrai N, et al. Surgical management of recto-sigmoid Hirschsprung’s disease. Acta Chir Belg. 2012;112(2):126–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2012.11680810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sulkowski JP, Cooper JN, Congeni A, et al. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(11):1619–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ekenze SO, Ngaikedi C, Obasi AA. Problems and outcome of Hirschsprung’s disease presenting after 1 year of age in a developing country. World J Surg. 2011;35(1):22–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0828-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mabula JB, Kayange NM, Manyama M, Chandika AB, et al. Hirschsprung’s disease in children: a five-year experience at a university teaching hospital in north-western Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:410. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma S, Gupta DK. Hirschsprung’s disease presenting beyond infancy: surgical options and postoperative outcome. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28(1):5–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-3002-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bandré E, Kaboré RA, Ouedraogo I, Soré O, et al. Hirschsprung’s disease: management problem in a developing country. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010;7(3):166–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0189-6725.70418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lukong CS, Ameh EA, Mshelbwala PM, et al. Management of anorectal malformation: changing trend over two decades in Zaria, Nigeria. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2011;8(1):19–22. https://doi.org/10.4103/0189-6725.78663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eeftinck Schattenkerk LD et al. Incisional hernia after abdominal surgery in young children: a retrospective analysis of incidence and risk factors. J Pediatr Surg 2021.

  17. Zani A et al. The Timing of Stoma Closure in Young children with Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017;27(1):7–11.

  18. Bradnock TJ. The use of stomas in the early management of Hirschsprung disease: Findings of a national, prospective cohort study. J Pediatr Surg 2017;52(9):1451–7.

  19. O’Connor A, Sawin RS. High morbidity of enterostomy and its closure in premature young children with necrotizing enterocolitis. Arch Surg. 1998;133(8):875–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aguayo P, et al. Stomal complications in the newborn with necrotizing enterocolitis. J Surg Res. 2009;157(2):275–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mattioli G et al. Risk management in pediatric surgery. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25(8):683–90. Bælum JK, Enterostomy complications in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) surgery, a retrospective chart review at Odense University Hospital. BMC Pediatr 2019;19(1):110.

  22. Lee J, et al. Enterostomy closure timing for minimizing postoperative complications in premature young children. Pediatr Neonatol. 2014;55(5):363–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mochizuki K, et al. Timing and outcome of stoma closure in very low birth weight young children with surgical intestinal disorders. Surg Today. 2017;47(8):1001–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Homan GJ. Failure to thrive: a practical guide. Am Fam Physician. 2016;94:295–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Corbett SS, Drewett RF. To what extent is failure to thrive in infancy associated with poorer cognitive development? A review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45:641–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bethell G, Kenny S, Corbett H. Enterostomy-related complications and growth following reversal in young children. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102:F230–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chong C, et al. Neonates living with enterostomy following necrotising enterocolitis are at high risk of becoming severely underweight. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178:1875–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Akgür FM, Cahit Tanyel F, Büyükpamukçu N, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics for colostomy closure in children: short versus long course. Pediatr Surg Int. 1992;7:279–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vogel I, Eeftinck Schattenkerk LD, Venema E, et al. Major stoma related morbidity in young children following stoma formation and closure: a retrospective cohort study. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57(10):402–6. Epub 2021 Nov 27. PMID: 34949444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim MS, Kim HK, Kim DY, Ju JK. The influence of nutritional assessment on the outcome of ostomy takedown. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(3):145–51. https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.3.145. Epub 2012 Jun 30. PMID: 22816058; PMCID: PMC3398110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Idea conception and study design: HAA, MSMA. Questionnaire design: HAA, MSMA, AASA, YAMA. Data collection and entry: HMMA, AMMA, KTSA, RAA, AMA, SJSQ. Analysis planning, data analysis and interpretation: GEMA. Manuscript writing and drafting: HAA, MSMA, GEMA.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghassan E. Mustafa Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) – Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia. The participants were assured of the confidentiality and anonymity of the information they provide. No financial benefit was offered to participants.

Consent for publication

No personal data were collected from the participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent to participate

An informed consent was obtained from legal guardians of each individual participant in this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alghamdi, H.A., Alqahtani, M.S.M., Asiri, H.M.M. et al. Investigating colostomy-related morbidity in children following stoma formation and closure in a tertiary hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cohort study 2024. BMC Pediatr 24, 630 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05089-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05089-z

Keywords