Skip to main content

Emergency department utilization among children with Long COVID symptoms: a COVID-19 research consortium study

Abstract

Background and objectives

Long COVID, characterized by persistent symptoms beyond the acute infection phase, remains poorly characterized in children. Our study aim is to determine if children who exhibit any symptoms/conditions associated with Long COVID after acute COVID-19 infection have higher Emergency Department (ED) utilization compared to those who do not exhibit these symptoms.

Methods

Data from the HealthJump ambulatory database from the COVID-19 Research Database Consortium was utilized to identify pediatric COVID-19 cases from March 2020 to May 2023. Long COVID cases were defined based on symptoms/conditions occurring 30–180 days after initial COVID diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were used to model the relationship between Long COVID and child ED utilization.

Results

Out of 130,010 children diagnosed with COVID-19, 43,645 (33.6%) exhibited at least one Long COVID symptom/condition. Children with Long COVID symptoms/conditions had 152% higher odds (OR: 2.52, CI: 2.32–2.73) of ED visits, while those with specific symptoms including “chest pain” had 255% higher odds (AOR: 3.55, CI: 2.73–4.54) and “fluid and electrolyte disturbances” had 229% higher odds (AOR: 3.29, CI: 2.23–4.73) compared to those without those symptoms/conditions.

Conclusion

This study reveals that children with Long COVID symptoms had notably higher odds of ED visits, with chest pain, fluid imbalances, and generalized pain being most closely linked to such visits. This study highlights the burden of Long COVID on ED providers and underscores the importance of improved guidance for managing Long COVID symptoms in children.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

COVID-19, a disease caused by infection from the virus SARS-CoV-2, affected children, albeit less severely compared to adults [1, 2]. Studies have also reported that children, like adults, can suffer from “Long COVID” or “post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC),” symptoms that occur after the acute phase of the infection [3].

The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined Long COVID symptoms and the timing of the condition using a Delphi method that applies primarily to adults, and specifically stated that there could be a separate definition for children [4]. An updated definition, also using a Delphi method, suggests that Long COVID can occur in children and young adults with one or more physical symptoms that affect daily functioning for at least 12 weeks after acute COVID-19 infection [5, 6]. There are several studies describing aspects of the disease such as immunological profile or exercise intolerance [7,8,9]. Others have estimated the prevalence [3, 7, 10, 11], which ranges from 6 to 25% in the first 90 days after acute infection [11] using a meta-analysis [7]. However, there is no consensus on how to delineate the set of symptoms and there have been calls for better definitions [12].

One study, Rao et al., conducted as part of the RECOVER project, identified a set of symptom and condition clusters likely associated with Long COVID in children using data from PEDSNet, a compilation of electronic medical records from several medical centers in the country [13]. The study selected symptoms and conditions that were significantly more prevalent when comparing children with and without COVID infection. This set of symptoms and conditions provides a starting point for describing Long COVID in children [13].

Moreover, few studies offer any insight into the healthcare utilization patterns of children with Long COVID. One Norwegian study found a 13% increase in primary care or Emergency Department (ED) use among children aged 1–5 years in the 6 months following a positive test for COVID-19 [14]. A Swedish study found that in a group of 5 children, 1 was hospitalized for peri-myocarditis within the 2 months following their COVID diagnosis [15]. As the ED usually forms the first line of clinical care for many children, it is important to understand the burden that Long COVID, a complex, multi-symptom condition with no clear clinical guidelines [16], can place on ED use.

The primary aim of this study is to determine if children who exhibit any symptoms or conditions after acute COVID illness have higher ED utilization compared to those who do not exhibit these symptoms. Secondarily, we aim to profile ED utilization by the different symptom and condition clusters among those with at least one symptom.

For this study we use the HealthJump database, a data integrator that houses electronic medical record (EMR) data of privately insured patients across outpatient and ambulatory settings. HealthJump provides data on over 90 million patients, including over 9 million children, to the COVID-19 Research Database consortium, which in turn provides free access to researchers with COVID-related research questions [17, 18]. This technology is at an early stage and the ability to use such services is still being tested.

Methods

Data source

We utilized the HealthJump stand-alone ambulatory database that compiles electronic health record (EHR) data including diagnoses, procedures, labs, vitals, medications, and histories sourced from participating members. This data is currently free and accessible with permissions from the COVID-19 Research Database consortium [19, 20]. This consortium, led by Datavant, brings together numerous private and public partners from various sectors to enable data access and promote knowledge sharing. The COVID-19 Research Database was established with approval from the Western Institutional Review Board and has an exemption from patient consent due to the use of deidentified data certified under HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996), including both HIPAA limited data and non–HIPAA-covered data, and this exemption applies to all research conducted within the COVID-19 Research Database. In partnership with the COVID-19 Research Database, HealthJump enables authorized access to its database of records from various EMR platforms, and while all regions in the United States are represented, there are some limitations to this representation, particularly from New England and the West North Central states.

The process of obtaining access required the submission of a research protocol for review and approval by the consortium. After several procedural steps, we were granted access to the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud and the appropriate databases. Database software (Snowflake), statistical software (R, SAS, etc.) were made available within the AWS environment. The HealthJump data used for this study was last updated as of May 18th, 2023.

Study sample

The study included children from birth to 17 years old who had at least one confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (ICD-10 Code ‘U07.1x’) between March 2020 and May 2023 and with a date associated with that diagnosis code (Supplementary Figure 1).

Long COVID symptom and condition clusters

The main exposure was symptom and condition clusters defined by Rao et al. as being clinically and statistically significantly associated with Long COVID [13]. The symptoms that were identified were changes in smell or taste, hair loss, generalized pain, chest pain, abnormal liver enzymes, skin rashes, allergies, fatigue and malaise, fever and chills, cardio-respiratory symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea. The conditions identified were myocarditis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, myositis, mental health conditions, disorders of the teeth and gingiva, ill-defined heart disease, fluid/electrolyte disturbances, thrombophlebitis and thromboembolism, acute kidney injury, tonsillitis, bronchiolitis, pneumonia, inflammatory skin conditions, obesity, motor disorders and gastroenteritis. Conditions and symptoms were classified using at least one ICD-10 diagnosis codes in the database between 30 and 180 days after initial COVID diagnosis. All other observed children were classified as not having Long COVID (Supplementary Fig. 1). We will refer to children having these symptoms or conditions as having “Long COVID” in the rest of the manuscript.

Other variables

We evaluated age, gender, race, region, and medical complexity as potential confounders. Medical complexity was defined using the complex chronic conditions (CCC) classification system developed by Feudtner et al. [21]. They defined CCC as “Any medical condition that can be reasonably expected to last at least 12 months (unless death intervenes) and to involve either several different organ systems or 1 organ system severely enough to require specialty pediatric care and probably some period of hospitalization in a tertiary care center,” and identified the ICD-10 diagnosis codes that were indicative of such complexity [21]. Analysis for pediatric CCC was completed in R using the pccc package as developed and described by Feinstein et al. [22].

Emergency department utilization visits or attendance

The outcome is ED use between 30 and 365 days after initial COVID diagnosis. ED visits were defined using the following CPT codes: 99,281, 99,282, 99,283, 99,284, 99,285.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were first employed to characterize the final study sample. We utilized t-tests, chi-squared tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to compare ED visits among children indicating Long COVID to those without, based on variables such as gender, race, region, and medical complexity. We also evaluated the relative proportions of ED visits by computing percentages across population sizes by each Long COVID symptom.

To further explore the association between indication of Long COVID and ED use, we used a series of multivariable logistic regression models. Logistic regression is well-suited for modeling binary outcomes, making it especially useful for modeling ED utilization. Interpretability of such models is facilitated by the computation of odds ratios, allowing for a straightforward understanding of the impact of Long COVID symptoms on the likelihood of an ED visit. Models were built sequentially, starting with a crude model (Model 1), then adjusting for race and gender (Model 2), medical complexity (Model 3), year of COVID diagnosis (Model 4), and finally an interaction term with Long COVID and year of diagnosis (Model 5).

Among those with at least one symptom/condition, we assessed the association of specific symptoms and conditions with ED visits after adjusting for medical complexity. For model robustness, symptoms and conditions with low ED utilization were filtered out; we included symptoms and conditions affecting at least 30 patients and where the number of ED visits was at least 10. Adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and p-values were calculated for each estimate. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted with SQL within the AWS environment and R/RStudio.

Results

In the HealthJump database, there were over 9 million children under 17 years of age, with 130,010 having at least one COVID-19 diagnosis code with an associated date. Of them, 43,645 (33.6%) had Long COVID according to the work completed by Rao et al. (Rao et al., 2022) (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Children with Long COVID reported a higher level of such symptoms in 2022 (58.6% vs. 32% in 2021) and had more medical complexity (5.8% vs. 2.9%) compared to children without. Overall, 3.2% of children with symptoms/conditions visited the Emergency Department (ED) compared to 1.3% of children without symptoms/conditions (Table 1).

Table 1  Profile of Children from HealthJump with a COVID-19 Diagnosis from January 2020 to May 2023, by existence of Long COVID symptoms or conditionsa

Among children with Long COVID, approximately 13% with “Fluid and electrolyte disturbances” and 9.5% with “chest pain” visited the ED (Table 2).

Table 2  Symptom and condition categories and ED visits among children with Long COVID

In multivariable analysis, the crude model (Model 1) showed that children with Long COVID had 152% higher odds (OR: 2.52, CI: 2.32–2.73) of visiting the ED compared to those without. After adjustment for race, gender, medical complexity, and year of COVID-19 diagnosis (Model 4), the results remained relatively unchanged (AOR: 2.70, CI: 2.49–2.93). In the multivariable model with an interaction term (Model 5), children with Long COVID in 2021 (compared to 2022) had 292% higher odds (AOR: 3.92, CI: 2.62–5.87) of an ED visit (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariable association between Long COVID and ED Utilizationa

In terms of specific symptoms among children with Long COVID, multivariable analysis showed that children with “chest pain” had 255% higher odds of an ED visit (AOR: 3.55, CI: 2.73–4.54), those with “fluid and electrolyte disturbances” had a 229% (AOR: 3.29, CI: 2.23–4.73) higher odds of an ED visit, and those with “generalized pain” had 160% (AOR: 2.60, CI: 1.77–3.69) higher odds of an ED visit compared to those without these symptoms (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Association of some specific symptoms/conditions with ED visits among those with any symptom or condition

Discussion

This study utilized a publicly available database to explore ED utilization among children with possible Long COVID symptoms compared to those without and found that children with symptoms had 170% higher odds of presenting to the ED. We hypothesize that a heightened concern amongst parents of children previously diagnosed with COVID-19 as well as the potential severity of symptoms were possible contributors to the greater number of ED visits in the group with Long COVID symptoms. Further, the study found that the symptoms or conditions most associated with ED visits were chest pain, fluid and electrolyte imbalances, and generalized pain.

These three symptoms were also among the PASC symptoms reported by Rao et al. [13] as being highly associated with COVID-19 infection in children, providing additional support for the likelihood of these symptoms being clinical features of Long COVID in children. These findings also align with results from another paper which found that chest pain was reported by 35% of children as a lingering symptom more than 12 weeks after initial COVID infection [16].

Our study did not find an association between persistent fatigue/malaise, a highly reported symptoms of Long COVID in children [16], and increased ED visits, implying that these symptoms alone may be insufficient to warrant an ED visit.

Our paper also showed that children with anxiety and other mental health problems had 85–96% higher odds of an ED visit, however, it is unclear whether this is a consequence of Long COVID or other hardships associated with the pandemic, including social isolation, school closures or disruption to routines [23].

Finally, our study highlights the high rates of ED visits among children with Long COVID symptoms. For example, 9.5% of those with chest pain, 13.5% of those with fluid and electrolyte disturbances, and 8.2% of those with generalized pain had at least one ED visit. There is some evidence that Long COVID symptoms in children are a consequence of inflammation and changes in the immune system [24,25,26,27]however, given the lack of standardized guidelines to diagnose, care for, or manage Long COVID in children [16, 28], the burden of care for these children often falls on ED providers.

Finally, this study tested the feasibility of using a large EHR-integrated database such as the COVID-19 Research Database Consortium for analysis of utilization outcomes. The initial process was encumbered by changes to the databases and challenges receiving access, resulting in a 6-to-9-month delay in the analysis. Additionally, limitations within the data, such as binning of children’s ages (birth to 17 years) restricted the ability to use exact ages in the analysis. Despite these limitations, integrated data providers such as these are important, as they provide access to large swaths of EHR data that would otherwise be inaccessible. Further, they provided a free data source to study COVID-19 and its implications on adults and children.

This study has several limitations. One, since we used only ICD-10 code to determine the existence of symptoms and conditions in children, there is a chance of misclassification. Two, we were unable to use age as an adjuster in the models due to restrictions imposed by the data consortium.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the potential impact of particular clinical features such as chest pain, generalized pain, and fluid and electrolyte disturbances on increased ED visits. Moreover, the study underscores the importance of improved guidance for managing Long COVID symptoms in children, to alleviate the burden on ED providers. This research sets the stage for more studies in this direction, fostering a better understanding of the implications of Long COVID on healthcare utilization in children.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from COVID-19 Research Database partners, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of COVID-19 Research Database partners, who are acknowledged at https://covid19researchdatabase.org/ Please contact the corresponding author, Mangala Rajan, at mar2834@med.cornell.edu for more information regarding data availability.

References

  1. Ludvigsson JF. Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(6):1088–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yuki K, Fujiogi M, Koutsogiannaki S. COVID-19 pathophysiology: a review. Clin Immunol. 2020;215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Buonsenso D, et al. Preliminary evidence on long COVID in children. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway: 1992). 2021;110(7):2208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Soriano JB, et al. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(4):e102-107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiappini E, et al. Recent insights on post-COVID in pediatrics. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2023:101097

  6. Stephenson T, et al. Long COVID (post-COVID-19 condition) in children: a modified Delphi process. Arch Dis Child. 2022;107(7):674–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez-Leon S, et al. Long-COVID in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):9950.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sante GD et al. Immune profile of children with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Long Covid). MedRxiv. 2021. p. 2021.05. 07.21256539.

  9. Hageman JR. Long COVID-19 or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children, adolescents, and young adults. Thorofare: SLACK Incorporated; 2021. p. e232–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Radtke T, et al. Long-term symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2021;326(9):869–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Funk AL, et al. Post–COVID-19 conditions among children 90 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2223253-2223253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Munblit D, Sigfrid L, Warner JO. Setting priorities to address research gaps in long-term COVID-19 outcomes in children. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(11):1095–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao S, et al. Clinical features and burden of postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(10):1000–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Magnusson K, et al. Healthcare use in 700 000 children and adolescents for six months after covid-19: before and after register based cohort study. BMJ. 2022;376:e066809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ludvigsson JF. Case report and systematic review suggest that children may experience similar long-term effects to adults after clinical COVID‐19. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(3):914–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garai R, et al. Clinical assessment of children with long COVID syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(6):1616–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. White-Williams C, et al. Use of telehealth among racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Rep. 2023;138(1):149–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kharroubi SA, Diab-El-Harake M. Sex-differences in COVID-19 diagnosis, risk factors and disease comorbidities: a large US-based cohort study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1029190.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. The COVID-19 Research Database. Available from: https://covid.c19researchdatabase.org/.

  20. Talwai A, et al. PIN83 the COVID-19 research database: building one of the largest pro bono real-world data repositories. Value Health. 2021;24:S121.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Feudtner C, et al. Pediatric complex chronic conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and complex medical technology dependence and transplantation. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Feinstein JA, et al. R package for pediatric complex chronic condition classification. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(6):596–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsuo OM, et al. Mental health among children and adolescents after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a prospective study in a tertiary university hospital. J Infect. 2023;87(6):576–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fainardi V, et al. Long COVID in children and adolescents. Life. 2022;12(2):285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Maltezou HC, Pavli A, Tsakris A. Post-COVID syndrome: an insight on its pathogenesis. Vaccines. 2021;9(5):497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Moritz D, et al. Seroprevalence and T-cell response in 32 children 10 months after COVID‐19. Acta Paediatr (Oslo Norway: 1992). 2022;111(5):1042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsang HW, et al. Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 immunity in convalescent children and adolescents. Front Immunol. 2021;12:797919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Weakley KE, et al. Clinical features and follow-up of referred children and young people with long COVID. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2023;42(12):1093–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.R. and A.S. conceived of the research idea and wrote the research proposal to the COVID-19 Research Database Consortium. P.B. did the data management and statistical analysis and M.R. and P.B. wrote the manuscript. A.S. provided critical comments to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mangala Rajan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The COVID-19 Research Database was established with approval from the Western Institutional Review Board and has an exemption from patient consent due to the use of deidentified data certified under HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996), including both HIPAA limited data and non–HIPAA-covered data and this exemption applies to all research conducted within the COVID-19 Research Database. As such, we did not require approval from the Weill Cornell Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

All authors have provided consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhimani, P., Scheinfeld, A. & Rajan, M. Emergency department utilization among children with Long COVID symptoms: a COVID-19 research consortium study. BMC Pediatr 24, 635 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04817-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04817-9

Keywords