Skip to main content
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

The Cohort of Indonesian Preterm Infants for Long-term Outcomes (CIPTO) study: a protocol

Abstract

Background

Indonesia has high numbers of preterm birth, i.e., around 600,000 preterm births annually. It imposes a significant burden on the Indonesia’s healthcare system. Indonesia therefore requires its own evidence-based reference to manage premature neonates and ex-preterm infants who subsequently survived. No long-term study on preterm infants in Indonesia has been conducted, therefore we aim to evaluate growth and development on ex-preterm infants until the pre-pubertal stage.

Methods

We at the Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital (CMGH) designed a prospective cohort study of preterm infants, i.e., the Cohort of Indonesian Preterm Infants for Long-term Outcomes (CIPTO) study. At least 500 subjects will be recruited with an estimation of two-year recruitment (i.e., the recruitment phase will be completed before 2024). The CIPTO study will observe long-term outcomes of ex-preterm infants, primarily on growth and developmental milestones until 8 years old. Aims of this study are to determine the ex-preterm outcomes and to generate an evidence-based reference of preterm care for ensuring optimum outcomes. The pre-specified long-term outcomes in this study are survival rates, growth outcomes, neurodevelopmental outcomes, feeding behavior, as well as hearing and vision impairments. Growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes will be assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 24 months of corrected age as well as at 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 years old.

Discussion

The CIPTO study is the first prospective cohort in Indonesia focusing on preterm infants born at the CMGH. With a follow up until 8 years old, this study may provide useful insights to generate an evidence-based, Indonesia’s health care reference in managing premature infants and ensuring the optimum outcomes of ex-preterm infants.

Peer Review reports

Background

Indonesia is one of the most highly populated countries, with more than 5 million births annually. Preterm birth, defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestational age, occurs in 10–15% of Indonesians [1]. With approximately 600,000 preterm births every year, this would potentially generate social-economic impacts to the national healthcare [2,3,4]. In the recent years, Indonesia has improved its preterm care, shifting the paradigm from “helping babies to breath” to “helping babies to grow” [5]. It thus imposes substantial tasks for the healthcare services in Indonesia to manage those ex-preterm infants in the community settings and to ensure their quality of life.

Preterm birth cases in Indonesia mainly handled at government-owned academic hospitals. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital (CMGH) is the top referral academic hospital in Indonesia, reporting more than 1,000 live births annually. Of note, more than half of those are preterm births, approximately 500–600 births [6]. It is also known that CMGH is one of the busiest neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) as well as one of the most advanced sites for treating preterm infant care in Indonesia. No long-term study on preterm infants in Indonesia has been conducted, therefore we aim to evaluate growth and development on ex-preterm infants until the pre-pubertal stage.

We therefore designed a prospective cohort study of preterm infants born at CMGH to observe long-term outcomes of preterm birth, particularly on the growth and developmental milestones. The Cohort of Indonesian Preterm Infants for Long-term Outcomes (CIPTO) study is the first and expected to be the largest prospective paediatric cohort in Indonesia. Aims of the CIPTO study are determining the outcomes of those ex-preterm infants and generating an evidence-based reference of preterm care to achieve optimum outcomes [7]. The CIPTO study will be a long-term study as it follows the ex-preterm infants until 8 years old (i.e., school-age children). This report describes its study protocol and pre-specified outcomes, hence allowing other neonatal centers to replicate this study.

Methods

Study design

This is a prospective cohort study conducted at the CMGH. All inborn infants are assessed for their eligibility and the participating infants will be followed from birth until discharge (as the baseline data). The sub-categories of preterm birth by the World Health Organization is adopted, i.e.: moderate to late preterm (32 to 37 weeks); very preterm (28 to less than 32 weeks); and extremely preterm (less than 28 weeks). In addition, the gestational age threshold to start treatment of preterm infants is minimum 26 weeks (i.e., a preterm birth less than 26 weeks is currently considered as a nonviable miscarriage). Furthermore, those survival preterm infants will be closely monitored until 8 years old. Outborn infants will be excluded because their data may be incomplete and they might receive inadequate treatments before being admitted into the CMGH [8, 9]. This study had been designed in 2019 and the data collection was started in 2020. As the COVID pandemic hit Indonesia since early 2020, the data collection was temporary withheld. Nevertheless, the data collection was re-started from early 2022. A detailed flowchart of the CIPTO study is presented in Supplementary Fig. 1, while types of post-discharge data collected from the participating subjects and the respective time points are depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Post-discharge data collection of ex-preterm infants at various time points. The corrected age is used to determine time points of collecting data until 24 months. Subsequent assessments will be performed annually from 3 to 8 years old. Each number indicates the age in months. Interpretations of each icon are presented at the left side of this figure. All icons are provided by https://www.flaticon.com

Setting

The CMGH is a government-owned public hospital, which also serves as the main academic hospital for the Faculty of Medicine at Universitas Indonesia. The CMGH is a tertiary center serves as the national reference hospital. It has a sophisticated NICU and greater coverage of diagnosis-related group reimbursement from the National Health Insurance, hence current international guidelines could be implemented with several limitations. Maternal and neonatal treatments would be administered to all patients, therefore, according to the recent guidelines without any economic barriers. The CMGH has the most advanced NICU in Indonesia, in which it is supported by a parenteral nutrition center, advanced ventilator devices (e.g., high-frequency oscillatory ventilator and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist), near-infrared spectroscopy, inhaled nitric oxide gas, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography, bedside ultrasound and echocardiography. Furthermore, the management of preterm infants at the CMGH, as an academic hospital, involves other paediatric specialists and other related departments as it is supported by the microbiological and pathological laboratories. The CMGH also able to performed complex surgery involving other departments. This collaboration facilitates routine discussion of cases to ensure that effective treatment shall be provided for each preterm infant.

Participants

The inclusion criteria are infants discharged from the neonatal unit of CMGH with (i) born less than 37 weeks of gestational age without any restriction on birth weight; (ii) born at the CMGH; (iii) live in greater area of Jakarta; and (iv) written informed consent obtained from respective parents. The exclusion criteria are (i) multiple congenital anomalies; (ii) suspected of syndrome or chromosomal abnormalities; (iii) parents unwilling to participate; and (iv) self-discharge against medical advice. The drop-out criterion is patients relocate out of Jakarta during the first 24 months of the follow-up period, decline to participate during the study and unable to be contacted during the study period.

Predictor variables

Potential predictors in this study are categorized into during hospital admission and after hospital discharge. Potential predictors obtained during hospital admission are gender; gestational age; anthropometric data at birth (weight, length and head circumference); maternal co-morbidities (preeclampsia [10], gestational diabetes [11, 12], intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis [13], maternal infection and antepartum hemorrhage, as well as COVID-19); fetal distress [14]; history of resuscitation and its related information; antenatal steroid administration [15]; surfactant therapy; type and route of enteral and parenteral feedings; preterm-associated morbidities (sepsis [16], respiratory distress syndrome/hyaline membrane disease [17, 18], necrotizing enterocolitis [19, 20], patent ductus arteriosus [21], intraventricular hemorrhage [22, 23], other intracranial abnormalities, bronchopulmonary dysplasia [24, 25], invasive ventilation use and neonatal seizure [26]); history of blood product transfusion; anthropometric data at discharge (weight, length, head circumference, skinfold thickness and mid-upper arm circumference); parental height; sociodemographic background [27]; family history of prematurity; as well as hearing and vision impairment. Potential predictors after hospital discharge are type and route of feeding; immunization status; any occurrence of infectious disease (both as outpatient and inpatient), as well as growth and developmental assessments during routine visits. A detailed operational definition of each variable is presented in Supplementary Table 1.

Outcomes

The pre-specified long-term outcomes in this study are survival rate; growth outcomes (stunted, wasting, undernutrition, obesity or microcephaly) [28, 29]; feeding behavior [30, 31]; neurodevelopmental outcomes [32, 33]; immunization record according to the current guideline of the Indonesian Paediatric Society [34]; hearing impairment [35]; and vision impairment, particularly retinopathy of prematurity [36]. Survival will be assessed in 6-month intervals by contacting the parents. Growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes will be assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 24 months of corrected age and subsequently at 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 years old. The growth and development social paediatric specialist team and the nutrition and metabolic disease paediatric specialist team will assess the growth and development at 9, 18 and 24 months old of corrected age and at 3, 5 and 8 years old. The assessment is conducted by trained personnel (with the Developmental Pre-screening Questionnaire as well as Ages and Stages Questionnaire) and verified at the age of 9 months, 18 months and 3 years (with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd edition) and at the age 5 years and 8 years (with the Griffith Scales of Child Development 3rd edition) by a paediatrician or trained psychologist. The Bahasa Indonesia version of those standardized tools are available and have been validated. At least at 9 months of corrected age, each participant will undergo laboratory examination for assessing deficiency of iron or other micronutrient. A referral to other specialist is possible whenever needed (e.g., neurology, respirology, hematology or endocrinology). Feeding behavior will be evaluated by using standardized caregiver-reported questionnaire at 5–6, 9 and 18 months of corrected age. The ear, nose and throat specialists will conduct hearing evaluations, based on the current screening guideline for neonates. A paediatric ophthalmologist will conduct vision evaluation, particularly for retinopathy of prematurity by using RetCam Envision or indirect ophthalmoscope. A detailed operational definition of each variable is presented in Supplementary Table 1. If an impairment is found at any time during the study period, the participant will be referred to receive an optimum care according to the updated local guideline.

Data sources and collection

Inpatient data will be collected daily and prospectively. Anthropometric measurement is conducted by a trained nurse or physician using standardized tools. Information on parental background, maternal morbidities, preterm-related morbidities and neonatal care will be obtained from the medical records or direct observation. Diagnosis of diseases will be decided by attending physician based on the updated diagnosis criteria. The research team (including undergraduate medical students/paediatric residents/professional officers) will collect the data prior and after the hospital discharge.

After the discharge, patients should have routine monthly health visits during the first year, every 3 months during the second year and every year after 2 years according to guideline by the Indonesia’s Ministry of Health. In this study, we will focus to obtain data at 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 24 months of corrected age and annually until 8 years of age. A delayed time of health visit will be rounded to the previous complete months (e.g., home visit at 3 months old is recorded as data at 2 months old). We will communicate with parents routinely to prevent any delay.

The health visit would be performed as scheduled home visit or as routine visit to primary care or paediatric clinic as well as mandatory visit to the CMGH. Data during home visits will be obtained by inspecting the children’s routine health check-up books (direct observation or photographs via mobile phone). As an alternative to home visit, parents could take their children to primary care or paediatric clinic for routine visits and subsequently report the results to the research team. In Jakarta, all primary care clinics have standardized and routinely calibrated anthropometric tools and measurement techniques, under supervision by the provincial and regional health bureaus. The follow-up data on 9, 18 and 24 months of corrected age and 3, 5, and 8 years old will be obtained from the mandatory visits to outpatient clinics at the CMGH. During those visits, the subject will have complete growth and developmental assessments by specialists to validate information obtained during routine home visit.

Data management

Data will be stored in internal servers operated by the Center for Health Economics and Policy Studies (CHEPS) at the Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia. Access for data extraction is only provided to the investigators, in order to protect privacy of all subjects. Any further request for secondary data analysis must obtain permission from all investigators.

Dissemination of results

Research results will be published in scientific journals and will be presented at scientific conferences as well. Of note, all paediatric clinical guidelines in Indonesia are regularly created and disseminated by the Indonesian Pediatric Society to all pediatricians in Indonesia. There are multiple working units within the Indonesian Pediatric Society, specializing in various health issues of pediatric population. With regard to the preterm infants, the Neonatology working unit is responsible to create relevant guidelines and disseminate them through regular conferences to practicing neonatologists. Results of this study will be shared with the Neonatology working unit to create a reference or guideline to manage surviving preterm infants in Indonesia.

Potential bias

Potential selection bias is noticed due to a decision of not analysing patients who either self-discharged against medical advice or relocated out of Jakarta during the first 24 months of the follow-up period. In order to minimize that bias, close contact with parents will be maintained and the parents will be supported (through parent support group) to prevent self-discharge against medical advice or loss to follow-up. When it is unavoidable, the baseline characteristics between drop-out subjects and study participants will be compared to assess potential confounders or bias sources. The reason of dropping out could be neither related to the observation nor the outcome of interest as well. Thus theoretically would not introduce bias to the data analysis.

Information bias, specifically observation bias, could occur mainly during the anthropometric measurement, although this study will deploy trained personnel and standardized tools. A growth analysis by using percentiles or z-scores might be a way to minimize misclassification bias due to the measurement error. Moreover, paediatric evaluations at 9, 18 and 24 months of corrected age, as well as at 3, 5 and 8 years of age would confirm the previous anthropometric measurements and developmental evaluations conducted in the community setting.

Study size

Several minimum sample size calculations were used to provide an adequate statistical power. For estimating the proportion of outcome (incidence) and 10% accuracy within the true value (e), the minimum sample size is 486 subjects, including potential 10% of drop-out and 15% of loss to follow-up. For estimating the survival, the minimum sample size is 193 subjects at the end of 8-year monitoring. For hypothesis testing of predictors with the mentioned study outcomes, the minimum sample size is 251 subjects, including potential 10% of drop-out and 15% of loss to follow-up. All sample size calculations were performed with a formula proposed by Lwanga and Lemeshow [37]. We have decided to recruit at least 500 subjects and the recruitment period requires approximately 2 years (i.e., before 2024).

Statistical methods

Descriptive statistics on baseline characteristics of subjects will be visualized in a table or graph. Continuous data with normal distribution will be presented as mean and standard deviation, while the remaining will be presented as median, interquartile range, minimum and maximum. Categorical data will be presented as numbers of observation and percentage. Data distribution analysis using the Shapiro Wilk statistics test with p-value more than 0.05 indicates a normally distributed data. Bivariate analysis of continuous data using independent t-test or one-way ANOVA (parametric test) and Mann-Whitney U or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (non-parametric test). Categorical data will be analyzed using a 2 × 2 table using the Chi-square test or Fischer’s exact test.

The main effect of interest is the relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) of pre-specified outcomes. Stratification analysis will be performed to evaluate possible confounder or effect modifier. A confounder is a variable related to predictors, causing the outcomes but not an intermediate variable. Several variables might be treated as predictors or confounders, depending on the analysis of causal relationships. The multivariate analysis will use generalized regression model with an adjusted RR as the main effect or Cox proportional hazard regression with an adjusted HR. Best causal or predictor model of each outcome analysis will be determined based on the most robust statistical model with satisfying discrimination and calibration performance, in which the chosen model will consider the basic disease mechanism. Data transformation or recoding will be conducted if a variable does not meet the criteria for the regression analysis.

Taken together, the CIPTO study is designed to improve long-term outcomes for preterm infants in Indonesia. A close monitoring and rigorous data analyses are expected to produce a new evidence-based reference for preterm care and to improve the overall quality of life of surviving infants in Indonesia.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AABR:

Automated Auditory Brainstem Response

ASQ:

Ages and Stages Questionnaire

BEBQ:

Baby Eating Behavior Questionnaire

BPD:

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

CHEPS:

Center for Health Economics and Policy Studies

CIPTO:

Cohort of Indonesian Preterm Infants for Long-term Outcomes

CMGH:

Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital

ENT:

Ear Nose and Throat

EUGR:

Extrauterine growth restriction

HR:

Hazard ratio

IVH:

Intraventricular haemorrhage

NEC:

Necrotizing enterocolitis

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

OAE:

Otoacoustic Emissions

PDA:

Persistent ductus arteriosus

PPM:

Person per month

RR:

Relative risk

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller A-B, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2019;7:e37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beauregard JL, Drews-Botsch C, Sales JM, Flanders WD, Kramer MR. Preterm birth, poverty, and cognitive development. Pediatrics. 2018;141:e20170509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petrou S. The economic consequences of preterm birth during the first 10 years of life. BJOG. 2005;112:10–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lakshmanan A, Agni M, Lieu T, Fleegler E, Kipke M, Friedlich PS, et al. The impact of preterm birth < 37 weeks on parents and families: a cross-sectional study in the 2 years after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Haksari EL. Historical perspectives: low birthweight and Preterm Infants in Indonesia. Neoreviews. 2019;20:e548–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sungkar A, Fattah ANA, Surya R, Santoso BI, Zalud I. High preterm birth at cipto mangunkusumo hospital as a national referral hospital in Indonesia. Med J Indones. 2017;26:198–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet (London, England). 2005;365:977–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasaki Y, Ishikawa K, Yokoi A, Ikeda T, Sengoku K, Kusuda S, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of extremely Preterm Infants in Japan according to Outborn/Inborn Birth Status. Pediatr Crit care Med a J soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr intensive crit care soc. 2019;20:963–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chung M-Y, Fang P-C, Chung C-H, Chen C-C, Hwang K-P, Chen F-S. Comparison of neonatal outcome for inborn and outborn very low-birthweight preterm infants. Pediatr Int. 2009;51:233–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1122–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: gestational diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:e49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. American Diabetes Association. 14. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44 Suppl 1:S200-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins RD, Saade G, Polin RA, Grobman WA, Buhimschi IA, Watterberg K, et al. Evaluation and management of women and newborns with a maternal diagnosis of Chorioamnionitis: Summary of a workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:426–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Antepartum fetal surveillance: ACOG Practice Bulletin, number 229. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:e116–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 713: Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy for fetal maturation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e102–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shane AL, Sánchez PJ, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet (London England). 2017;390:1770–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Te Pas A, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome – 2019 update. Neonatology. 2019;115:432–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolfson SL, Frech R, Hewitt C, Shanklin DR. Radiographic diagnosis of hyaline membrane disease. Radiology. 1969;93:339–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Walsh MC, Kliegman RM. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986;33:179–201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP, Marshall R, Barton L, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg. 1978;187:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Evans N. Diagnosis of the preterm patent ductus arteriosus: clinical signs, biomarkers, or ultrasound? Semin Perinatol. 2012;36:114–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978;92:529–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ballabh P. Intraventricular hemorrhage in premature infants: mechanism of disease. Pediatr Res. 2010;67:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1723–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ibrahim J, Bhandari V. The definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: an evolving dilemma. Pediatr Res. 2018;84:586–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abend NS, Wusthoff CJ. Neonatal seizures and status epilepticus. J Clin Neurophysiol off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc. 2012;29:441–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. World Bank Group. Report: Aspiring Indonesia—Expanding the Middle Class. 2019. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33237. Accessed 15 Jul 2022.

  28. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Assessment of differences in linear growth among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. de Onis M, Garza C, Victora CG, Onyango AW, Frongillo EA, Martines J. The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: planning, study design, and methodology. Food Nutr Bull. 2004;25(1 Suppl):15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Llewellyn CH, van Jaarsveld CHM, Johnson L, Carnell S, Wardle J. Development and factor structure of the Baby Eating Behaviour Questionnaire in the Gemini birth cohort. Appetite. 2011;57:388–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wardle J, Guthrie CA, Sanderson S, Rapoport L. Development of the children’s eating Behaviour Questionnaire. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001;42:963–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Squires J, Bricker D. Ages & Stages Questionnaires[R], Third Edition (ASQ-3[TM]): A Parent-Completed Child-Monitoring System. Baltimore; 2009. https://www.michaeltaymormd.com/storage/app/media/forms/master-set-asq.pdf.

  33. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Third Edition: technical manual. Third. 2006. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123741776/bayley-iii-clinical-use-and-interpretation.

  34. Indonesian Pediatric Society, Jadwal Imunisasi IDAI. 2020. 2021. https://www.idai.or.id/tentang-idai/pernyataan-idai/jadwal-imunisasi-idai-2020. Accessed 1 Jul 2022.

  35. Liming BJ, Carter J, Cheng A, Choo D, Curotta J, Carvalho D, et al. International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG) consensus recommendations: hearing loss in the pediatric patient. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;90:251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilkinson AR, Haines L, Head K, Fielder AR. UK retinopathy of prematurity guideline. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:2137–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S, World Health Organization. Sample size determination in health studies: a practical manual. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The investigators thank all attending physicians and specialists at the Department of Child Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Ear, Nose, Throat, Head and Neck, Department of Opthalmology and Center of Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine at the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and CMGH for their support during study protocol development. Investigators also thank Dinarda Ulf Nadobudskaya, Audesia Alvianita and previous research assistants for their contributions during the preliminary data collection. Investigators also thank the CHEPS team from the Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia for developing the data management system.

Funding

All fundings related to inpatient care are provided by the national health insurance. Routine health visits at the community setting are a part of the Indonesian Ministry of Health’s program as well, thus fully funded by the national health insurance. However, the cost of visiting a paediatrician at private clinic or hospital would be borne by subjects individually. This cohort was partially funded by PT. Sarihusada Generasi Mahardika. It had no role in study design and data analyses, as well as it did not support any product related to preterm infant care during hospital admission or after hospital discharge. It did not receive any access to the research data and participants’ personal information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The primary investigators are R.R. and H.G.H. The main coordinator for data assessment and collection during in-hospital period is M.A.R.S. The coordinator for all related developmental outcomes is H.G. The coordinator for all related nutritional outcomes is Y.D. All co-authors are involved in this study. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rinawati Rohsiswatmo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The principal ethical approval has been granted by the Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia and Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital in 2019 with the registration number of 19-03-0228. The research is performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written parental consent will be obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors have no competing interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: 

Supplementary Figure 1. The flowchart of CIPTO study. Supplementary Table 1. The operational definition of CIPTO study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rohsiswatmo, R., Hikmahrachim, H.G., Sjahrulla, M.A.R. et al. The Cohort of Indonesian Preterm Infants for Long-term Outcomes (CIPTO) study: a protocol. BMC Pediatr 23, 518 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04263-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04263-z

Keywords