Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effect of zinc supplementation on anthropometric measurements in healthy children over two years: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Pediatrics volume 23, Article number: 414 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Zinc deficiency is one of the most important micronutrient deficiencies in children that can affect the children’s growth pattern. In this regard, different studies were conducted to assess the effect of zinc supplementation on growth patterns in healthy children. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review has summarized the results of these studies. So, in the present study, we systematically reviewed the result of the studies that assessed the effect of zinc supplementation on anthropometric parameters in healthy, over 2-year-old children.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to November 2021. Data were pooled using the random-effects method and were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

The pooled results of eight studies, including 1586 participants, showed that zinc supplementation significantly increases height [(WMD): 0.9, 95% CI: (0.27, 1.52), p < 0.001], weight [(WMD): 0.51, 95% CI: (0.06, 0.97), p < 0.001], height for age (HAZ) [(WMD): 0.07, 95% CI: (0.03, 0.10), p < 0.001]. Also, meta-regression analysis did not reveal any significant association between dose and duration of intervention and anthropometric parameters.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates the beneficial effects of zinc supplementation on weight, height, and HAZ.

Peer Review reports

Background

Child growth is a vital indicator of health status in the human life cycle. Different factors including childhood infections, child undernutrition, and food insecurity could affect the child’s growth [1]. Child undernutrition is the underlying cause of three million annual deaths worldwide [2]. It includes stunting, wasting, and essential micronutrient deficiencies. Failure to properly treat nutritional deficiencies, or even subclinical malnutrition, can have detrimental effects on an individual’s health and the nation’s overall economic growth [3].

One of the most important micronutrient deficiencies especially in children is attributed to zinc deficiency [4]. Zinc insufficiency is a huge issue in terms of public health that affects over two billion people all over the world [5, 6]. In Iran, it has been estimated that 10% of people suffer from zinc deficiency [7, 8]. It has been demonstrated that zinc deficiencies cause children to have slower rates of growth. This issue seems more important in children over two years. Because in children under two years of age, maternal breastfeeding, could provide the children`s need for zinc [9]. In addition, the body store of zinc from in-utero development could partly compensate for the body’s need for zinc [10].

In this context, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund are presently advocating for the use of a micronutrient powder formulation that contains 4.1-5 mg of zinc together with 14 other micronutrients [11]. In terms of zinc supplementation, some meta-analysis studies were conducted to assess its effect on the growth of children. Brown et al., systematically reviewed the effect of zinc supplementation in prepubertal children [12]. Imdad et al. assessed the effect of zinc supplementation on the growth pattern of under five-year-old children in developing countries [13]. Liu et al. reviewed the effect of zinc supplementation in children with growth retardation. Different original publications also assessed the effect of zinc supplementation on the growth pattern of healthy children and provided mixed results. To the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic review study that summarizes the result of these studies. So, the current meta-analysis was carried out to compile a summary of the evidence that is currently available on the influence of zinc supplementation on anthropometric parameters in healthy children.

Materials and methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) procedure served as the basis for the planning, execution, and reporting of this work [14].

Search strategy

Online databases including Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched to find all the relevant clinical trials up to November 2021. The search strategy for each database is provided in Table S1. The following search terms were used: Population: children; Intervention: Zinc, outcome: Anthropometric Measurements. In addition, we conducted a hand search of the reference lists of the relevant papers and review papers to include any other studies that might be suitable.

Inclusion criteria

Clinical trials were included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis if they fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (a) were randomized with either parallel or crossover designs in healthy children over 2 years; (b) reported anthropometric indices before and after intervention in each group; (c) compared zinc supplementation with the placebo. Studies were excluded if they: (a) do not use zinc alone; (b) did not provide effects sizes on anthropometric factors before and after the trial; (c): Abstracts, conference proceedings or book chapters, and unpublished studies.

Two investigators (ED and FA) selected eligible articles separately by reading titles, abstracts, and whenever required the full text of the publications. Any disagreements in this regard were resolved through discussion with the third researcher (ZF).

Data extraction

Data extraction was done by two researchers independently (VM and AS). The disagreements were settled through discussion and by agreeing with the assistance of a third reviewer (ZN). The following information was extracted: name of the first author, publication year, individuals’ characteristics (mean age), study design, sample size, type of zinc prescribed, the dosage of zinc, unit, and duration of intervention. The corrected mean changes and standard deviations of anthropometric measurements were taken during the study for both the intervention group and the control group, as well as the variables that were considered to be confounding.

Risk of bias assessment

The Cochrane quality assessment tool was used for assessing the risk of bias [15]. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias (VM and AS) and the risk of bias was divided into high risk, low risk, and unclear risk.

Certainty assessment

The overall certainty of evidence across the studies was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guideline, and the evidence was divided into high, moderate, low, and extremely low categories [16].

Statistical analysis

The overall effect sizes were calculated using the mean changes in anthropometric measurements and their respective standard deviations (SD). In studies that reported the SEM, the SD was determined using the following formula: SD = SEM × √n, in which the n is the sample size. The I2 statistic and Cochrane’s Q test were used to determine the presence of heterogeneity. Significant heterogeneity was determined if the I2 value was > 50% or P < 0.05 [17]. To find probable sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were performed according to the predefined variables including gender, country region (Asian or Non-Asian), sample size, and duration of studies (> 24,<24). A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine whether or not the overall effect size was dependent on a specific study. The formal test developed by Begg and Egger looked into the possibility of publication bias. Stata, version 14 was utilized for the meta-analysis, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered a significant level.

Results

Study selection

As shown in Fig. 1, of 9939 publications that were retrieved in a systematic search, 25 articles remained for full-text evaluation. Additional 17 articles were excluded by full text for the following reasons: not being clinical trials [18,19,20], do not use zinc alone [21,22,23,24,25], non-healthy subjects [26,27,28], under 2 years [29,30,31,32,33], and zinc supplementation of mothers [34]. Finally, eight eligible RCTs remained for inclusion in the current systematic review and meta-analysis [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of study selection for inclusion trials in the systematic review

Full size image

Study characteristics

The characteristics of included RCTs are illustrated in Table 1. Two studies were performed on boys and two on girls and four on both genders. The sample size of included RCTs varied from 46 to 804 participants, resulting in a total sample size of 1586. The dosage of zinc supplements varied from 5 to 15 mg/day, and the duration of intervention ranged from 6 to 28 weeks.

Table 1 Characteristic of included studies in meta-analysis
Full size table

Risk of bias result

The result of the risk of bias is shown in Table 2. Only two studies [36, 37] could be considered high-quality studies, two RCTs [42, 43] were of moderate quality and others had low-quality.

Table 2 Risk of bias assessment for randomized clinical trials included in the current meta-analysis on the effect of zinc supplementation on Anthropometric factors in Healthy children over 2 years1
Full size table

Grading of evidence

The GRADE protocol was used to assess the certainty of the evidence (Table 3). Accordingly, studies investigating the effects of zinc supplementation on weight and height were regarded as moderate quality due to the high heterogeneity between studies. Moreover, the effects of zinc supplementation on HAZ, and WAZ had moderate quality evidence. HAZ had low heterogeneity and WAZ has high heterogeneity.

Table 3 GRADE profile of the effect of zinc supplementation on Anthropometric factors in Healthy children over 2 years
Full size table

Findings from the meta-analysis

Overall, eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. These trials had a total sample size of 1586 individuals aged two years and over.

The effect of zinc supplementation on weight

The effects of zinc supplementation on weight were evaluated in seven research, including 1488 people [35, 36, 38,39,40,41,42]. Considering the presence of high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 95.9, P < 0.001), the random-effect model was used. The result indicated that zinc supplementation had a significant impact on weight [(WMD): 0.51, 95% CI: (0.06, 0.97), p < 0.001] (Fig. 2-B). The heterogeneity might be explained by the location of the study, duration of intervention, gender, and sample size. The subgroup analysis showed that the studies conducted in Asian countries (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.545) and gender (boy, I2 = 40.4 p = 0.195) were the potential sources of heterogeneity (Table 4).

Table 4 Subgroup analyses the effect of zinc supplementation on Anthropometric factors in Healthy children over 2 years
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot for; A: weight, B: height, C: weight for age z-score (WAZ), D: height for age z-score (HAZ).

WMD: weighted mean difference

Full size image

The effect of zinc supplementation on height

The effects of zinc supplementation on height were evaluated in seven research, including 1488 people [35, 36, 38,39,40,41,42]. Considering the presence of high heterogeneity (I2 = 93.9, P < 0.001), the random effect model was used. The result showed that zinc supplementation had a significant effect on height [(WMD): 0.9, 95% CI: (0.27,1.52), p < 0.001] (Fig. 2-A). As shown in Table 4, the heterogeneity might be explained by the location of the study, duration of intervention, gender, and sample size. The subgroup analysis showed that the intervention duration of ≥ 24 weeks (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.975) was the potential source of heterogeneity. An intervention duration of greater than 24 weeks (WMD 0.78; 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.99, p < 0.000) significantly increased height compared with a shorter intervention duration (WMD: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.16, p = 0.975). Moreover, we found a significant increase in height with zinc supplementation in RCTs with a sample size of less than 100 (Table 4).

The effect of zinc supplementation on WAZ

The effects of zinc supplementation on WAZ were evaluated in four studies (with five effect sizes), including 581 subjects [35,36,37, 40]. There was high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 72.4, P = 0.006). The result of the random-effect model showed that zinc supplementation had a significant impact on WAZ [(WMD): 0.06, 95% CI: (-0.03, 0.15), p-value = 0.18] (Fig. 2-C). The heterogeneity might be explained by the duration of the intervention, gender, and sample size. The subgroup analysis showed that all subgroups were the potential sources of heterogeneity and we found a significant increase in WAZ with zinc supplementation with duration 24≥, and among non-Asian people (Table 4).

The effect of zinc supplementation on HAZ

The effects of zinc supplementation on HAZ were evaluated in four research (with five effect sizes), including 581 people [35,36,37, 40]. There was no significant between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 33.1, P = 0.20). The result of the fixed-effect model indicated that zinc supplementation had no significant impact on HAZ [(WMD): 0.07, 95% CI: (0.03, 0.10), p < 0.001] (Fig. 2-D).

Sensitivity analysis

The results of the sensitivity analysis revealed that the magnitude of the overall effect regarding the association between zinc supplementation and height, WAZ, and HAZ did not depend on a single study. However, in terms of weight, the total impact size depended on some studies [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. As a result, when those studies were disregarded, a substantial positive correlation between zinc supplementation and weight was discovered.

Publication bias

As can be seen on the funnel plot (Figure S1 A-D), there were no signs of publication bias in the studies that evaluated the effect of zinc supplementation on weight, height, WAZ, and HAZ.

Meta-regression analysis

Meta-regression was used to investigate the potential linear association between dose and duration of intervention, with absolute changes in anthropometric indices. Accordingly, meta-regression analysis did not reveal any significant association between the dose of supplementation with weight changes (plinearity = 0.54), height (plinearity = 0.09), HAZ (plinearity = 0.89), WAZ (plinearity = 0.43) (Figure S2 A-D). Likewise, there was no significant association between the duration of intervention with weight changes (plinearity = 0.92), height (plinearity = 0.51), WAZ (plinearity = 0.96), HAZ (plinearity = 0.31) (Figure S3 A-D).

Discussion

Child malnutrition is one of the main public health challenges worldwide and about 45% of under 5-year-old children’s death is attributed to undernutrition [44]. In this regard, zinc deficiency is considered one of the most important causes of morbidity [45]. So, different studies were conducted to assess the effect of zinc supplementation on child growth in healthy children over two years of age. The meta-analysis of these studies showed that zinc supplementation had a significant effect on healthy children’s weight and height. Previous meta-analysis in prepubertal children showed a significant, positive effect of zinc supplementation on height and weight [12]. In under-five-year-old children in developing countries, Imdad et al. demonstrated the significant effect of zinc supplementation on linear growth [13]. In children with growth retardation, Liu et al. showed a significant effect of zinc supplementation on height, and weight [10]. However, Ramakrishnan et al. did not show a positive effect of zinc supplementation on weight and height in under five-year-old children [46]. The differences between the results of the various meta-analysis may be partly related to the differences in the age group of children. It has been shown that zinc supplementation had a more positive effect on over two years of old children compared with infant. Moreover, the health status of children can affect the result. For example, Liu et al. conducted a meta-analysis study on children with growth retardation. However, in the present meta-analysis, we included the paper with healthy subjects.

The positive effect of zinc supplementation on weight and height may be related to the effect of zinc on the metabolism of growth hormones (GH). Zinc had a positive effect on the secretion and sensitivity of GH [47,48,49]. Moreover, zinc had an important role in the binding of GH to its receptors [50]. In addition, zinc regulates the expression of GH receptor and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) genes in the liver [51]. Besides, zinc supplementation increases the insulin-like growth factor-1, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in healthy children [52].

In the present study, we indicated the significant effect of zinc supplementation on HAZ but not WAZ of healthy children over two-year-old. Conversely, Liu et al. reported the significant effect of zinc supplementation on WAZ in children over two years. In the present systematic review, we included studies with healthy participants, however, Liu et al. conducted a systematic review on studies with children with retarded growth.

In subgroup analyses, we found that intervention duration, study location, gender, and sample size were significant sources of heterogeneity. A previous meta-analysis study indicated that a longer dose of zinc intervention resulted in a more effect on the risk factors [53]. In addition, gender differences have been observed in the association of zinc and other diseases [54]. Moreover, the higher prevalence of zinc deficiency in developing countries may justify the effect of study location on heterogeneity [55]. Besides, a previous study showed that studies with small sample sizes are more heterogeneous than large ones [56].

Limitations

In the current meta-analysis, some potential limitations should be addressed. The publication bias could not be fully excluded. There was considerable heterogeneity between the included studies. Although we performed a subgroup meta-analysis for some factors, not all sources of statistical heterogeneity were recognized. In addition, not all included studies are methodologically sound. The potential methodological problems of studies were as follow selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, and reporting bias.

Conclusion

Altogether, the results of this meta-analysis are in favor of the effect of zinc supplementation on weight, WAZ, and height in healthy under-two-year-old children. Considering the limitations of the included studies, these findings should be confirmed by more high-quality randomized clinical trials that focus on the long-term effects of zinc supplementation on anthropometric indices.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the institution’s policy, but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bekele T, Rawstorne P, Rahman B. Trends in child growth failure among children under five years of age in Ethiopia: evidence from the 2000 to 2016 demographic and health surveys. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0254768.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M, Ezzati M, Grantham-McGregor S, Katz J, Martorell R. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. The lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sazawal S, Habib AA, Dhingra U, Dutta A, Dhingra P, Sarkar A, Deb S, Alam J, Husna A, Black RE. Impact of micronutrient fortification of yoghurt on micronutrient status markers and growth–a randomized double blind controlled trial among school children in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hassanein M, Zaki NM, Ahmed AG. Effect of Zn foliar application on growth and yield characteristics of two wheat cultivars. Curr Sci Int. 2019;8(3):491–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Organization WH. The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. World Health Organization; 2000.

  6. Diab L, Krebs NF. Vitamin excess and Deficiency. Pediatr Rev. 2018;39(4):161–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta S, Brazier AKM, Lowe NM. Zinc deficiency in low- and middle-income countries: prevalence and approaches for mitigation. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020;33(5):624–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonoodi K, Moslem A, Darroudi S, Ahmadnezhad M, Mazloum Z, Tayefi M, Zadeh SAT, Eslami S, Shafiee M, Khashayarmanesh Z, et al. Serum and dietary zinc and copper in iranian girls. Clin Biochem. 2018;54:25–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown KH, Engle-Stone R, Krebs NF, Peerson JM. Dietary intervention strategies to enhance zinc nutrition: promotion and support of breastfeeding for infants and young children. FoodNutr Bull. 2009;30(1suppl1):144–S171.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu E, Pimpin L, Shulkin M, Kranz S, Duggan CP, Mozaffarian D, Fawzi WW. Effect of zinc supplementation on growth outcomes in children under 5 years of age. Nutrients. 2018;10(3):377.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jefferds ME, Irizarry L, Timmer A, Tripp K. UNICEF—CDC global assessment of home fortification interventions 2011: current status, new directions, and implications for policy and programmatic guidance. FoodNutr Bull. 2013;34(4):434–43.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown KH, Peerson JM, Rivera J, Allen LH. Effect of supplemental zinc on the growth and serum zinc concentrations of prepubertal children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75(6):1062–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Imdad A, Bhutta ZA. Effect of preventive zinc supplementation on linear growth in children under 5 years of age in developing countries: a meta-analysis of studies for input to the lives saved tool. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(3):22.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372.

  15. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA. The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Black RE, Fischer Walker C. Role of zinc in child health and survival. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2012;70:37–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunanti IR, Al-Mamun A, Schubert L, Long KZ. The effect of zinc supplementation on body composition and hormone levels related to adiposity among children: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(16):2924–39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yakoob MY, Lo CW. Nutrition (micronutrients) in child growth and development: a systematic review on current evidence, recommendations and opportunities for further research. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017;38(8):665–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nenni V, Nataprawira HM, Yuniati T. Role of combined zinc, vitamin A, and fish oil supplementation in childhood tuberculosis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013;44(5):854–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Prawirohartono EP, Nyström L, Ivarsson A, Stenlund H, Lind T. The impact of prenatal vitamin A and zinc supplementation on growth of children up to 2 years of age in rural Java, Indonesia. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(12):2197–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rerksuppaphol S, Rerksuppaphol L. Effect of zinc plus multivitamin supplementation on growth in school children. Pediatr Int. 2016;58(11):1193–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Soofi S, Cousens S, Iqbal SP, Akhund T, Khan J, Ahmed I, Zaidi AK, Bhutta ZA. Effect of provision of daily zinc and iron with several micronutrients on growth and morbidity among young children in Pakistan: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9886):29–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Troesch B, van Stuijvenberg ME, Smuts CM, Kruger HS, Biebinger R, Hurrell RF, Baumgartner J, Zimmermann MB. A micronutrient powder with low doses of highly absorbable iron and zinc reduces iron and zinc deficiency and improves weight-for-age Z-scores in south african children. J Nutr. 2011;141(2):237–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barffour MA, Hinnouho GM, Kounnavong S, Wessells KR, Ratsavong K, Bounheuang B, Chanhthavong B, Sitthideth D, Sengnam K, Arnold CD, et al. Effects of Daily Zinc, Daily multiple micronutrient powder, or therapeutic zinc supplementation for Diarrhea Prevention on Physical Growth, Anemia, and Micronutrient Status in rural laotian children: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2019;207:80–89e82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lebenthal Y, Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Lazar L, Shalitin S, Tenenbaum A, Shamir R, Phillip M. Effect of a nutritional supplement on growth in short and lean prepubertal children: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Pediatr. 2014;165(6):1190–1193e1191.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lopes MMGD, De Brito NJN, De Medeiros Rocha ÉD, França MC, De Das Graças M, Brandão-Neto J. Nutritional assessment methods for zinc supplementation in prepubertal non-zinc-deficient children. Food and Nutrition Research 2015, 59.

  29. Effect of provision. Of micronutrient supplementation on growth and morbidity among young children in Pakistan. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(9):691.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Abdollahi M, Abdollahi Z, Fozouni F, Bondarianzadeh D. Oral zinc supplementation positively affects linear growth, but not weight, in children 6–24 months of age. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5(3):280–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdollahi M, Ajami M, Abdollahi Z, Kalantari N, Houshiarrad A, Fozouni F, Fallahrokni A, Mazandarani FS. Zinc supplementation is an effective and feasible strategy to prevent growth retardation in 6 to 24 month children: a pragmatic double blind, randomized trial. Heliyon. 2019;5(11):e02581.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Batool N, Shaikh S, Chohan MN. Clinical effectiveness of prophylactic zinc on growth, pneumonia and diarrhea in children less than 1 year. J Liaquat Univ Med Health Sci. 2021;20(1):26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Locks LM, Manji KP, McDonald CM, Kupka R, Kisenge R, Aboud S, Wang M, Fawzi WW, Duggan CP. Effect of zinc and multivitamin supplementation on the growth of Tanzanian children aged 6–84 wk: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(3):910–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Adu-Afarwuah S, Lartey A, Okronipa H, Ashorn P, Peerson JM, Arimond M, Ashorn U, Zeilani M, Vosti S, Dewey KG. Small-quantity, lipid-based nutrient supplements provided to women during pregnancy and 6 mo postpartum and to their infants from 6 mo of age increase the mean attained length of 18-mo-old children in semi-urban Ghana: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104(3):797–808.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Vakili R, Yazdan Bakhsh M, Vahedian M, Mahmoudi M, Saeidi M, Vakili S. The effect of zinc supplementation on linear growth and growth factors in primary schoolchildren in the suburbs mashhad, iran. Int J Pediatr. 2015;3(21):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rerksuppaphol S, Rerksuppaphol L. Zinc supplementation enhances linear growth in school-aged children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Rep. 2017;9(4):58–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ruz M, Castillo-Duran C, Lara X, Codoceo J, Rebolledo A, Atalah E. A 14-mo zinc-supplementation trial in apparently healthy chilean preschool children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66(6):1406–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Clark PJ, Eastell R, Barker ME. Zinc supplementation and bone growth in pubertal girls. The Lancet. 1999;354(9177):485.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaseb F, Fallah R. Efficacy of zinc supplementation on improvement of weight and height growth of healthy 9–18 year children. World Appl Sci J. 2013;26:89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kikafunda JK, Walker AF, Allan EF, Tumwine JK. Effect of zinc supplementation on growth and body composition of ugandan preschool children: a randomized, controlled, intervention trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(6):1261–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ebrahimi S, Pormahmodi A, Kamkar A. Study of zinc supplementation on growth of schoolchildren in Yasuj, Southwest of Iran. Pak J Nutr. 2006;5(4):341–2.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dehbozorgi P, Mohseni P, Mazloom Z. The influence of zinc sulfate on the growth of school age children in villages around Shiraz 2002, 2003. J Med Sci. 2007;7(4):690–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Vakili R, Bakhsh MY, Vahedian M, Mahmoudi M, Saeidi M, Vakili S. The effect of zinc supplementation on linear growth and growth factors in primary schoolchildren in the suburbs Mashhad, Iran. Int J Pediatr. 2015;3(2):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  44. children. : improving survival and well-being [https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/children-reducing-mortality]

  45. Kapil U, Jain K. Magnitude of zinc deficiency amongst under five children in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78(9):1069–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ramakrishnan U, Nguyen P, Martorell R. Effects of micronutrients on growth of children under 5 y of age: meta-analyses of single and multiple nutrient interventions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(1):191–203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Alves CX, Vale SHL, Dantas MMG, Maia AA, Franca MC, Marchini JS, Leite LD, Brandao-Neto J. Positive effects of zinc supplementation on growth, GH, IGF1, and IGFBP3 in eutrophic children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2012;25(9–10):881–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun P, Wang S, Jiang Y, Tao Y, Tian Y, Zhu K, Wan H, Zhang L, Zhang L. Zip1, Zip2, and Zip8 mRNA expressions were associated with growth hormone level during the growth hormone provocation test in children with short stature. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013;155(1):11–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Oner G, Bhaumick B, Bala RM. Effect of zinc deficiency on serum somatomedin levels and skeletal growth in young rats. Endocrinology. 1984;114(5):1860–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Herington A. Effect of zinc on the binding and action of growth hormone in isolated rat adipocytes. Biochem Int. 1985;11(6):853–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lefebvre D, Beckers F, Ketelslegers J-M, Thissen J-P. Zinc regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), growth hormone receptor (GHR) and binding protein (GHBP) gene expression in rat cultured hepatocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998;138(1–2):127–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cesur Y, Yordam N, Doğan M. Serum insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 levels in children with zinc deficiency and the effect of zinc supplementation on these parameters. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2009;22(12):1137–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pompano LM, Boy E. Effects of dose and duration of zinc interventions on risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(1):141–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Azizi F. Gender differences in the relationship between serum zinc concentration and metabolic syndrome. Ann Hum Biol. 2014;41(5):436–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Larson CP, Roy S, Khan AI, Rahman AS, Qadri F. Zinc treatment to under-five children: applications to improve child survival and reduce burden of disease. J Health Popul Nutr. 2008;26(3):356.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF, Goeman JJ. Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones: a meta-meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(8):860–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran for support.

Funding

This project was supported by Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran. The role of the funding: designing of the study and data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Student Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran

    Vahid Monfared & Adel Salehian

  2. Liver and gastrointestinal diseases research center, Tabriz University of medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Zeinab Nikniaz

  3. Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Soraiya Ebrahimpour-Koujan

  4. Food Safety Research Center (salt), Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, ZIP Code: 3581793563, Iran

    Zeinab Faghfoori

Authors
  1. Vahid Monfared
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adel Salehian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zeinab Nikniaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Soraiya Ebrahimpour-Koujan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zeinab Faghfoori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZF was responsible for the conception and design of the study. VM, SEK, and AS were responsible for the data acquisition. VM, SEK, ZN, and AS were responsible for data analysis. ZN, ZF were responsible for data interpretation. VM, ZN drafted the manuscript; all other authors revised and commented on the draft. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeinab Faghfoori.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This systematic and meta-analysis study was approved by the ethical committee of Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran (reference number IR.SEMUMS.REC.1401.013).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monfared, V., Salehian, A., Nikniaz, Z. et al. The effect of zinc supplementation on anthropometric measurements in healthy children over two years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 23, 414 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04249-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04249-x

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us