Skip to main content

Bacterium detected by gram stain and drug sensitivity in Chinese children with acute sinusitis

Abstract

Background

Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is one of the common diseases of upper respiratory tract infection in children. Bacterial infection is a significant aggravating factor in pediatric ARS. In this research, our goal was to detected the bacterial flora and antibiotic sensitivity of ARS in Chinese children.

Methods

We recruited 133 children with ARS between January 2020 and January 2022 from our hospital. Sinus secretion were collected and cultured for Gram stain as well as antimicrobial susceptibility tests.

Results

Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were detected in order in children with ARS, of which 25% were negative for bacterial culture and 10% were positive for two strains. Amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium were useful for Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Moraxella catarrhalis. Quinolones are useful for Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Conclusions

This research updates the proportion of ARS bacterial infection in children in southern China and the antibiotic sensitivity.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is one of the most common infections of upper respiratory tract both in children and adults [1]. It is reported that 5-10% of children with upper respiratory tract infection are complicated with acute sinusitis and 6-13% of children were diagnosed with sinusitis at the age of 3 [2]. Although pediatric ARS is common in outpatient clinics in China, there is a lack of relevant data on its epidemiology and economic burden. Both the mucosa of nasal passages and paranasal sinuses are involved in most ARS cases [3,4,5]. Viruses and pathogenic bacteria are often found in nasal secretion of ARS patients [6,7,8]. Generally, most ARS were caused by virus and aggravated by bacterial coinfection or secondary infection [9, 10].

Sinus puncture culture was believed to be the most accurate method for diagnosing ARS previously. However, recent meta-analysis found that endoscopic guided middle meatus samples may be more sensitive and less invasive for ARS compared with sinus puncture [11, 12]. Therefore, the samples were collected from middle meatus with the help of endoscopy.

In pediatric ARS, it was discovered that respiratory bacteria were present in 65% of the sinus secretions, while bacterial and viral agents were present in 32% of the secretions [13]. Rhinovirus and influenza virus were the most prevalent viruses, while Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae ranked first in bacterial species [13]. However, the microbial composition which contributed to ARS was not static. For example, popularization of vaccines in children can lead to the changes of the frequency and bacteriology of ARS [14]. Generally, children with uncomplicated ARS need only symptomatic treatment. Antibiotics were used when complications or concomitant disease were found as described in several guidelines [15].

The bacteriology of ARS has, however, barely been investigated, especially in the population of Chinese children. In this research, we aimed was to detect the bacterial proportion of middle meatus secretions and antibiotic sensitivity of these bacterium in Chinese children with ARS. Our data can provide bacteriology basis for antibiotic treatment of ARS.

Method

Patients

We recruited 133 children with ARS between January 2020 and January 2022 from Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center in Guangzhou, China. The demographic information of the enrolled children was collected at the first interview. The inclusion criteria were as follows: two or more symptoms attack out of blue, one of nasal obstruction or runny nose and the other of facial pain/compression or reduction or anosmia lasting less than 12 weeks as described by European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis (EPOS2020) [15]. The exclusion criteria were as follows: antibiotics treatment within 1 weeks before enrollment, nasal allergy or asthma, chronic nasal symptoms or polyps, and prior nasal surgery. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all children and children over 7 years of age before enrollment. The Ethics Committee of Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center approved the conduct of this study.

Bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivity test

Middle meatus secretions were removed by swab guided by endoscopy and placed in tubes containing transport medium for further detection. For bacterial cultures, all samples were stained with Gram stain and plated on blood agar and chocolate agar and incubated at 35 °C for 24 h in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Pathogenic bacteria were identified using standard methods [16]. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done by the BD Phoenix System as described previously [17].

Statistical analyses

SPSS 17.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The numeric variables were presented as total numbers, percentages, and mean ± standard deviation (SD) values. The differences between different groups were compared using χ2 test and SNK test. When P < 0.05, the difference indicated statistical significance.

Results

Demographic characteristics of children

The basic information of study subjects is summarized in Table 1. During the study period, 856 children were diagnosed as ARS in our center. A total of 133 children were enrolled, but only 75 male and 42 females aged from 1 to 8 years old completed sampling. Disease duration ranged from 10 days to 12 weeks. The color of nasal mucus presented as yellow (47.8%), white (5.2%), and yellow green (47%).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical data of children with ARS

The bacteria distribution tested by GS

The most common pathogens were Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in children with ARS. (Fig. 1). 33 cases showed as negative results in bacterial culture and 14 cases showed positive results of two strains.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Proportions of bacteria detected in the sinus aspirates of pediatric patients with acute rhinosinusitis

Antibiotic sensitivity test results

Staphylococcus aureus reacted well to quinolones, gentamicin and vancomycin. Haemophilus influenzae reacted well to amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium, second and third generation cephalosporin, macrolide, and quinolones. Streptococcus pneumoniae reacted well to amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium, third generation cephalosporin, macrolide, and quinolones. Moraxella catarrhalis reacted well to amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium and macrolide. Pseudomonas aeruginosa reacted well to third generation cephalosporin and quinolones (Table 2).

Table 2 Antibiotic sensitivity of common organism

Discussion

ARS, one of the most common diseases in children, is increasingly prevalent. ARS causes annoying symptoms and affects quality of life negatively. Previous studies showed that 53.7% of ARS patients had bacterial infections [11]. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis are the most frequent bacterium in the world [18, 19]. However, the species of microbe vary depended on different circumstances such as age, season, and et al. [20, 21]. In children, the most frequent microbes in ABRS are Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, and anaerobes [22].

For example, Brook et al. found that aerobes (mainly staphylococci and streptococci) were identified in about 38% of cases, whereas Haemophilus species were rare [23]. The most frequent bacteria were anaerobic Gram-positive cocci and Bacteroides species, especially B. melaninogenicus, and fusobacteria. Our data showed that 75% children with ARS can be diagnosed as acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS). Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequent microbes in our study. Moreover, about 10% cases is polymicrobial. Previous reports suggested that enteric bacteria and anaerobes are rarely identified except for odontogenic origin [24, 25]. Similarly, our study also did not identify enteric bacteria and anaerobes in children ABRS. The differences between our results and Brook’s study may be attributed to geographical and racial factors. Moreover, most studies conducted by Brook were at least ten years early and the microbiota may also change over time. Besides, the sample size may also affect our results.

Determining the antibiotic sensitivity helps to reduce the occurrence of side effects and chronicity as well as the development of resistance to the bacteria. Amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate or cephalosporins were recommended by the EPOS2020 for children with complications or concomitant disease that could be exacerbated by ARS [15]. Similarly, amoxicillin clavulanic acid, the second generation of cephalosporin and macrolide drugs are recommended by experts in China [26]. Our data showed that amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium, a first-line antibiotic recommend by several guidelines, are useful for Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae as well as Haemophilus influenzae. While Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa could be inhibited by quinolones. Indeed, previous studies identified quinolones as the drug of choice for the treatment of ARS in penicillin-allergic patients [27, 28], however, that quinolones often cause gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea and nausea. Further studies are needed to investigate the safety and efficacy of quinolones to determine whether they can be used as first-line drugs for the treatment of ARS.

Our study had some limitations. First, our study is a single center research, so our results cannot be generalized to other pediatric populations of China. Second, children with ARS should be tested for viruses to further expand the knowledge of ARS in follow-up studies. Further muti-center studies with large samples should be conducted to better understand the etiology of ARS in Chinese children.

Despite of the above limitations, our study reported the distribution of bacterial infections and the antibiotic sensitivity in pediatric ARS of our center, which is the largest children’s hospital with the most patients in South China. Our results provide a theoretical basis for a deeper understanding of the onset and clinical treatment of pediatric ARS.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rohrmann S, Overvad K, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Jakobsen MU, Egeberg R, Tjønneland A, et al. Meat consumption and mortality–results from the european prospective investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. BMC Med. 2013;11:63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Benninger MS, Sedory Holzer SE, Lau J. Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: summary of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research evidence-based report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gwaltney JM Jr, Phillips CD, Miller RD, Riker DK. Computed tomographic study of the common cold. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kristo A, Uhari M, Luotonen J, Koivunen P, Ilkko E, Tapiainen T, et al. Paranasal sinus findings in children during respiratory infection evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatrics. 2003;111:e586–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alho OP, Karttunen TJ, Karttunen R, Tuokko H, Koskela M, Suramo I, et al. Subjects with allergic rhinitis show signs of more severely impaired paranasal sinus functioning during viral colds than nonallergic subjects. Allergy. 2003;58:767–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gwaltney JM Jr, Wiesinger BA, Patrie JT. Acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis: the value of antimicrobial treatment and the natural history. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:227–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heikkinen T, Järvinen A. The common cold. Lancet. 2003;361:51–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Payne SC, Benninger MS. Staphylococcus aureus is a major pathogen in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:e121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenfeld RM, Andes D, Bhattacharyya N, Cheung D, Eisenberg S, Ganiats TG, et al. Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137:1–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berg O, Carenfelt C, Rystedt G, Anggård A. Occurrence of asymptomatic sinusitis in common cold and other acute ENT-infections. Rhinology. 1986;24:223–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith SS, Ference EH, Evans CT, Tan BK, Kern RC, Chandra RK. The prevalence of bacterial infection in acute rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:57–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Benninger MS, Payne SC, Ferguson BJ, Hadley JA, Ahmad N. Endoscopically directed middle meatal cultures versus maxillary sinus taps in acute bacterial maxillary rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134:3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawada S, Matsubara S. Microbiology of Acute Maxillary Sinusitis in Children. Laryngoscope. 2021;131:E2705–e2711.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Orlandi RR, Kingdom TT, Smith TL, Bleier B, DeConde A, Luong AU, et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021;11:213–739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, Hellings PW, Kern R, Reitsma S, et al. European position paper on Rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020;58:1–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marglani OA, Alherabi AZ, Herzallah IR, Saati FA, Tantawy EA, Alandejani TA, et al. Acute rhinosinusitis during Hajj season 2014: prevalence of bacterial infection and patterns of antimicrobial susceptibility. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016;14:583–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstein MP, Lewis JS 2. nd. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Subcommittee on Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: background, Organization, Functions, and processes. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58.

  18. Pfaller MA, Ehrhardt AF, Jones RN. Frequency of pathogen occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility among community-acquired respiratory tract infections in the respiratory surveillance program study: microbiology from the medical office practice environment. Am J Med. 2001;111 Suppl 9A:4S-12S; discussion 36S-38S.

  19. Anon JB, Jacobs MR, Poole MD, Ambrose PG, Benninger MS, Hadley JA, et al. Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ortiz E, Yen Ng RT, Alliegro FC, Teixeira C, Muranaka EB, Sakano E. Microbiology of rhinosinusitis in immunosupressed patients from the University Hospital. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77:522–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Larson DA, Han JK. Microbiology of sinusitis: does allergy or endoscopic sinus surgery affect the microbiologic flora? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;19:199–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fokkens W, Lund V, Mullol J. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007. Rhinol Suppl. 2007;20:1–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brook I. Bacteriologic features of chronic sinusitis in children. JAMA. 1981;246:967–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brook I. Microbiology of acute and chronic maxillary sinusitis associated with an odontogenic origin. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:823–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brook I, Frazier EH, Gher ME. Jr. Microbiology of periapical abscesses and associated maxillary sinusitis. J Periodontol. 1996;67:608–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pediatrics Group and Nasology Group of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck surgery. Suggestions on diagnosis and treatment of nasosinusitis in children (2012, Kunming). Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013,48:177–9.

  27. Rosenfeld RM, Piccirillo JF, Chandrasekhar SS, Brook I, Ashok Kumar K, Kramper M, et al. Clinical practice guideline (update): adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152:1–s39.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Karageorgopoulos DE, Giannopoulou KP, Grammatikos AP, Dimopoulos G, Falagas ME. Fluoroquinolones compared with beta-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ. 2008;178:845–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Grant of China (No. 81970861), the Guangdong Province Natural Science Grant (No. 2021A1515010940), and the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 202102020079).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conceptualization and data curation was performed by Yinhui Zeng and Haiqing Xiao, investigations were done by Yinhui Zeng, analysis by Yan Li, writing - review and editing by Yan Li, Yinhui Zeng, Haiqing Xiao and Wenlong Liu. The frst draft of the manuscript was written by Yan Li, Yinhui Zeng and Haiqing Xiao. All authors read an approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenlong Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The Ethics Committee of Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center approved the conduct of this study. Informed consent of all intervention children and parents. The written informed consent obtained from the parents were also on behalf of their children, for all the interventions.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Zeng, Y., Xiao, H. et al. Bacterium detected by gram stain and drug sensitivity in Chinese children with acute sinusitis. BMC Pediatr 23, 350 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04178-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04178-9

Keywords