Skip to main content
Download PDF

Birth weight and gestational age distributions in a rural Kenyan population

BMC Pediatrics volume 23, Article number: 112 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

With the increased availability of access to prenatal ultrasound in low/middle-income countries, there is opportunity to better characterize the association between fetal growth and birth weight across global settings. This is important, as fetal growth curves and birthweight charts are often used as proxy health indicators. As part of a randomized control trial, in which ultrasonography was utilized to establish accurate gestational age of pregnancies, we explored the association between gestational age and birthweight among a cohort in Western Kenya, then compared our results to data reported by the INTERGROWTH-21st study.

Methods

This study was conducted in 8 geographical clusters across 3 counties in Western Kenya. Eligible subjects were nulliparous women carrying singleton pregnancies. An early ultrasound was performed between 6 + 0/7 and 13 + 6/7 weeks gestational age. At birth, infants were weighed on platform scales provided either by the study team (community births), or the Government of Kenya (public health facilities). The 10th, 25th, median, 75th, and 90th BW percentiles for 36 to 42 weeks gestation were determined; resulting percentile points were plotted, and curves determined using a cubic spline technique. A signed rank test was used to quantify the comparison of the percentiles generated in the rural Kenyan sample with those of the INTERGROWTH-21st study.

Results

A total of 1291 infants (of 1408 pregnant women randomized) were included. Ninety-three infants did not have a measured birth weight. The majority of these were due to miscarriage (n = 49) or stillbirth (n = 27). No significant differences were found between subjects who were lost to follow-up. Signed rank comparisons of the observed median of the Western Kenya data at 10th, 50th, and 90th birthweight percentiles, as compared to medians reported in the INTERGROWTH-21st distributions, revealed close alignment between the two datasets, with significant differences at 36 and 37 weeks. Limitations of the current study include small sample size, and detection of potential digit preference bias.

Conclusions

A comparison of birthweight percentiles by gestational age estimation, among a sample of infants from rural Kenya, revealed slight differences as compared to those from the global population (INTERGROWTH-21st).

Trial registration

This is a single site sub-study of data collected in conjunction with the Aspirin Supplementation for Pregnancy Indicated Risk Reduction In Nulliparas (ASPIRIN) Trial, which is listed at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02409680 (07/04/2015).

Peer Review reports

Background

Pediatricians, obstetricians, and public health workers have become accustomed to using fetal growth curves to assess risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality. The widespread use of obstetrical ultrasound early in gestation, particularly within high-income settings, has allowed very accurate and precise estimation of gestational age [1, 2]. Coupled with equally accurate and precise measurements of birth weights, investigators have been able to construct highly accurate fetal growth curves, such as those by WHO [3], Fenton et al. [4], and INTERGROWTH-21st [5, 6].

While early prenatal ultrasound is common in high resource countries, it is less common or even nonexistent in low resource settings. This has made the development of fetal growth curves difficult in these settings. Growing access to low-cost ultrasound (US) devices in these settings may begin to increase access to antenatal sonography for populations in low-to-middle income countries [7, 8]. Fetal growth curves are used to categorize infant gestational age and quality of intrauterine growth, which is vitally important for clinical care of the newborn, as well as for evaluating the impact of public health programs and pregnancy interventions, such as those related to maternal nutrition [9]. However, one challenge is that one cannot merely assume the growth curves or birthweight charts in one global region may be applicable in another region. For example, there are well known differences in birth weight distributions between Africa and Asia [10]. There is some evidence that customizing fetal growth curves for particular populations may result in higher sensitivity and specificity to determine small-for-gestational and low birthweight neonatal outcomes, as compared to using broad based population charts across more heterogenous regions [11]. Detecting these differences via use of ultrasound data, as compared to other methods, such as fundal height, improves accuracy, particularly in regards to stratifying risk for neonatal mortality [12, 13]. Therefore, it is crucial that each global region has population specific fetal growth curves for accurate classification of infants by birth weight within that region.

The Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research recently completed a multi-site global clinical trial of low dose aspirin administered to women throughout pregnancy, beginning between 6–14 weeks gestation [14]. To assure women met the gestational age requirements for the study, all participants received an ultrasound prior to study entry. Therefore, a cohort of women resulted who had all undergone gestational age assessment prior to 14 weeks of pregnancy. Women were followed throughout pregnancy, and birthweights of resulting infants obtained as soon as possible after birth. With this cohort of accurate gestational age and birthweight data, we have generated estimated fetal growth curves for the Kenya site. There is evidence that customized birthweight cohort data may be more accurate for detecting fetal growth restriction related to placental dysfunction – an important hypothesized contributor to premature birth – as compared to utilizing population-based birthweight information. [15]

One of the largest, most comprehensive set of studies on multinational birth weight are those of the INTERGROWTH-21st trial [16, 17]. These studies were specifically designed to generate accurate, longitudinal, and multinational fetal and childhood anthropometric measurements. INTERGROWTH-21st subjects were recruited from eight countries, including from the environs of Nairobi, Kenya.

Methods

The data presented in this paper were acquired at the Kenya site as part of the Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research ASPIRIN trial. Detailed study methods are described in Hoffman et al. [14, 18]. The Kenyan site (Fig. 1) is situated within the malaria holoendemic Lake region of Western Kenya, specifically the counties of Busia, Kakamega, and Bungoma [19]. The eight geographical clusters within the Kenyan site are served by over 20 health facilities, most operated by the government and staffed by nurse-midwives, clinical officers, and a single medical officer. Three hospitals in the area function as county referral hospitals [20]. There is one tertiary teaching and referral hospital based in Eldoret for the western region with a newly established training program in maternal fetal medicine. Most physicians are generalists, with some trained obstetricians and pediatricians [20].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the study region, located in Busia, Bungoma, and Kakamega counties of western Kenya. Study clusters are outlined in gray. County locations within Kenya are depicted in the inset map

Full size image

Eligible subjects were pregnant nulliparous women carrying singleton pregnancies. An early ultrasound was performed between 6 + 0/7 and 13 + 6/7 weeks gestational age for accurate pregnancy dating. From this ultrasound, the estimated day of delivery was determined using the ACOG algorithm [21, 22], which was programed onto a handheld android device. Eligible women were then randomized to a daily regimen of low dose aspirin or placebo and followed to 42 days post pregnancy completion. Randomization was performed by site, with the randomization sequence for each site provided by the data coordinating center (RTI) using a computer algorithm based on a randomly permuted block design with varied block sizes. The primary analysis included data from Kenya and 5 other countries (India, Pakistan, Guatemala, Zambia, and Democratic Republic of Congo) and found that the aspirin intervention reduced delivery < 34 weeks; no impact on birthweight was observed [14]. Within the Kenya population, mean birthweight and gestational age were comparable by treatment arm. The analysis of variance was statistically significant for birthweight (p = 0.0167), but the difference of means was not clinically significant (~ 63 g). The analysis of variance for gestational age was not statistically or clinically significant.

Infants born to subjects were weighed on platform scales either at a delivery in a health facility, or if born outside of a facility, at the home of the local village elder [23]. For infants delivered at participating public health facilities, the weighing scales used were those provided by the Government of Kenya; our study team did not have control over the make or model of infant weighing scales utilized. The weights of infants born within the community-setting, and weighed by village elders, were obtained using scales (Perlong Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.RGZ-20 Nanjing, China) provided by our research team. Only infants with a measured birth weight (BW) were included in this analysis.

For subjects experiencing either a stillbirth or an infant death before the 42-day follow-up period, the assumed cause of death was determined using a previously published algorithm [24, 25]. Estimated gestational age (EGA) in days at time of delivery or stillbirth was defined as (Date of delivery – Estimated Date of Delivery by ultrasound) + 280. EGA in weeks was defined as EGA Days/7. Completed weeks of gestation was calculated by rounding the EGA weeks to the next larger integer.

Statistical analyses were performed using JMP software and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Inc, Cary, NC USA). The 10th, 25th, median, 75th, and 90th BW percentiles for 36 and 43 completed weeks gestation were determined, the resulting percentile points were plotted, and curves determined using a cubic spline technique. Percentile curves for gestational ages less than 36 weeks (n = 57) or greater than 43 weeks (n = 9) were not plotted due to paucity of data for these groups.

A signed rank test was used to quantify the comparison of the percentiles generated in this study with those of the INTERGROWTH-21st study. This test was performed twice within each gestational week – once testing the null hypothesis that the Kenya Male median equals the reported median of the INTERGROWTH-21st Male data, and once testing the null hypothesis that the Kenya Female median equals the reported median of the INTERGROWTH-21st Female data. This analysis was non-directional and performed at the alpha = 0.05 significance level.

Results

The consort diagram is shown in Fig. 2; 1408 women were randomized. Twenty-two did not have delivery gestational age data and are considered lost to follow-up (LTFU), and 93 infants did not have a measured birth weight. Miscarriages accounted for the majority (49) of the subjects with missing measured BW. Twenty-seven stillbirths, 5 infant deaths, and 12 survivors lacked measured birth weights. Two additional infants were excluded because of highly unlikely birth weight/gestational age combinations. Therefore, 1291 infants were included in the final data set. However, for the estimation of birthweight by gestational age percentiles, data were restricted to gestational ages 36–42 weeks, due to small numbers outside these parameters, as well as to compare with the INTEGROWTH21 data. This resulted in n = 1189.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Consort diagram

Full size image

Table 1 shows maternal age and gestational age at study entry for each excluded group and the final analysis group. No significant differences were found between subjects who were lost-to-follow up for measured birth weight, or included in the final data set.

Table 1 Maternal age (years) and gestational age (weeks) at study entry
Full size table

The majority of subjects (n = 1081) delivered in a health facility, while 210 delivered at home. Deliveries were conducted primarily by nurse-midwives (1103); 106 deliveries were conducted by Traditional Birth Attendants, 33 by either self or a family member, and 49 by a physician. The vast majority of birth weights were obtained on day of life (DOL) 0 (91%); 98% were obtained within DOL 0–3.

Figure 3 shows the birth weight distribution. A normal distribution model is projected onto the histogram. The histogram shows evidence of digit preference in the recording of birth weights, which affected the Anderson–Darling Goodness of Fit of the normal distribution model (< 0.001). It is also possible that the normal distribution model was rejected due to the limited precision of the data, resulting in a large number of tied data points [26].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Histogram of measured birth weights. A fitted normal distribution curve is projected onto the actual data

Full size image

Figure 4 depicts a scatterplot of gestational age and measured birth weight, with a cubic spline line fitted to the data. Deaths (n = 32, 2.5%), either stillbirth or early infant death (0–6 days postnatal age), are plotted in red, whereas survivors are plotted in black. Causes of death for the live born infants (n = 19) were primarily asphyxia (n = 10) followed by prematurity (n = 3), infection (n = 4), congenital anomalies (n = 1) and unknown (n = 1). Stillbirths (n = 13) were primarily due to asphyxia (n = 10), followed by infection (n = 2) and unknown (n = 1).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Scatterplot of Measured Birth Weight (y axis) and gestational age (x axis). A cubic spline was fitted and plotted onto the data. Red points indicate either a fetal or neonatal death

Full size image

Excluding stillborn and early neonatal death infants, the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th birth weight percentiles for 36–42 completed weeks of gestation are shown in Table 2. Percentiles for completed weeks of gestation less than 36 or greater than 42 have been excluded due to paucity of data in each of these gestational week categories. The data points for these percentiles are plotted as curves onto the birth weight:gestational age actual data in Fig. 5.

Table 2 Birth weight (g) percentiles by completed weeks of gestation, 36 – 42 weeks gestation
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Birth weight percentile curves are plotted against actual data (n=1189). Only percentiles for 36—42 weeks are plotted due to paucity of data in the other completed weeks of gestation, as well as facillitating comparison with INTERGROWTH 21 data

Full size image

Table 3 shows the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles for birth weight for the present study and for the INTERGROWTH-21st study; p-values for the signed rank test comparison of medians are also reported in this table. To ensure comparability with the INTERGROWTH-21st data, this comparison uses a subset (n = 1189) of the Kenya population, excluding stillbirths, early infant deaths, and gestational ages < 36 or > 42. Births at 33–35 weeks and 43 weeks gestations were excluded due to paucity in data. Furthermore, due to limited public data for INTERGROWTH-21st, the analysis was limited to single data-point (median) comparisons, which does not address the intricacies of the full fetal growth curve distribution. Although this analysis had limitations the observed significant differences warrant further research with more robust data and methods in the rural, Western Kenyan population.

Table 3 Birthweight Percentiles by Gestational Age for Rural Kenya and INTERGROWTH-21st
Full size table

Discussion

Our data complements that reported by INTERGROWTH-21st, in that our Kenyan subjects were recruited from a rural agricultural setting with a significant malaria burden, whereas the Kenyan subjects in the INTERGROWTH-21st trial were recruited from the Parklands area of suburban Nairobi. Parklands is considered a middle to upper socioeconomic urban area, while the area of our study is largely defined as a World Bank rural poverty area. Thus, our population demographics are considerably different than those of the Kenyan subjects included in the INTERGROWTH-21st study. Despite these in-country geographical variations, our results, from rural Western Kenya, are quite similar to those reported for INTERGROWTH-21st.

The incidence of prematurity and low birth weight are important public health indicators for a population. In addition, the construction of birth weight percentiles for gestational age are crucial for establishing the intrauterine growth of an infant, which is then used to track postnatal growth. Abnormal postnatal growth, as evidenced by deviations from the expected weight for age percentile that are established by the assessment of birth weight for gestational age, is then used as a warning sign for the need for nutritional intervention. However, it is known that the birth weight distribution curve varies among populations. In addition, despite extensive study, it has been challenging for clinicians and public health practitioners to find accurate prenatal surrogate markers that correlate reliably with actual birthweight [13, 27, 28]. Reasons may include genetics, environmental factors, and average maternal nutritional status. As evidenced by the Dutch famine in World War II, birth weight can clearly be adversely affected by the general population nutrition level and access to adequate food [29, 30].

Birth weight and gestational age are intertwined, and it is crucial in evaluating a population to be able to separate low birth weight due to prematurity and low birth weight due to fetal factors, either constitutional or nutritional. Therefore, fetal growth curves with accurate birth weights are important tools for evaluating public health interventions designed to reduce rates of stillbirth [31, 32], premature birth, low birthweight, and neonatal mortality [33]. However, accurate and precise estimation of gestational age is difficult, and generally only attained either in an in vitro fertilization or by means of an early (less than 14 weeks) fetal ultrasound capable of making accurate anthropometric measurements. While these ultrasounds have become commonplace in high resource countries, they are less common or completely inaccessible in low resource settings, where global rates of neonatal morbidity and mortality are highest, and where increased exposure to infectious and non-infectious diseases [34, 35], deleterious environmental exposures [36], poor access to early and comprehensive antenatal care [37, 38], and/or sub-optimal maternal nutritional factors [39,40,41] are likely to have the greatest impact on fetal growth. The data presented in this study represent pregnancies for which all acquired gestational dating, via obstetric ultrasonography, at less than 14 weeks.

The INTERGROWTH-21st study found that for most gestational weeks, median birthweights differed for male and female infants. The signed rank test used for this analysis was performed separately for male and female data but was limited by sample size disparities. Although this analysis had limitations and was based on a single metric (median), the observed significant differences at lower gestational ages for females and higher gestational ages for males warrant further investigation in the rural, western Kenyan population. A major strength of our cohort is the data originated from a prospectively designed study. Subjects were enrolled early in pregnancy as part of the ASPIRIN trial, and tracked prospectively through delivery to 42 days postpartum, as part of our established, population-based maternal newborn health registry, which employs rigorous quality assurance procedures [42]. This design ensured that, as much as possible, all pregnancies were tracked, not just those enrolling late in gestation or even after delivery. In retrospective studies, stillbirths and miscarriages are the most likely type of fetal/early neonatal deaths to be missed, thereby skewing the data towards a heavier birthweight distribution. Therefore, we elected to include all stillbirths and early neonatal deaths for whom accurate measured birth weights were obtained (Fig. 4). However, we did exclude these data from the percentile calculations, as these were also excluded in the INTERGROWTH-21st data. The ASPIRIN trial showed no differences in birth weight between the active drug and placebo groups [14]. For this paper, we performed a subgroup analysis of the Kenyan subjects, and a small (~ 60 g) difference in the mean birth weights was found. We believe this small difference to be clinically insignificant, and therefore did not stratify the analyses by active drug or placebo.

In the present study, another strength was our very low loss-to-follow up rate; we lost only 22 subjects (1.56%) to follow-up before birth. Another key strength is the rigorous quality-assurance standards that were utilized to train, monitor, and evaluate the sonographers in this study [43, 44]. The ultrasound sonography devices that we utilized (GE LOGIQ e systems using wide-band (2.0–5.5 MHz) convex array transducers (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) are of high quality, providing additional confidence in regards to the accuracy of fetal growth measurements that were obtained among our cohort.

There are several limitations of our study. First, the sample size is relatively small, especially for infants born below 36 weeks and of less than 2500 g. Furthermore, we used data only from women who had qualified for and enrolled in the ASPIRIN study, as these women all had accurate ultrasound gestational dating. This limited our subjects to primagravidas, and to singleton pregnancies, consistent with the ASPIRIN eligibility requirements. It is well established that multiple gestation pregnancies are more likely to result in low birthweight infants. Birth spacing can also impact the birthweights of subsequently born sibling infants, as compared to first born infants [45].

Similar to challenges faced by other groups (e.g., EN-INDEPTH; Blencowe, et al., 2021) [46] another significant limitation in our study is the lack of birth weight data for many stillbirths and early neonatal deaths. In general, it can be difficult, within the sub-Saharan setting, to obtain accurate birthweight data for very low birthweight infants (e.g., below 1500 g). This is especially problematic for estimating mortality risk of infants less than these parameters. We made strenuous efforts to obtain these data, but cultural practices and a deep stigma related to stillbirth limited our ability to do so [47, 48]. It is the cultural practice in our study population to immediately inter stillbirths and neonatal deaths, making it nearly impossible to obtain birth weight data on this subset of the population [48]. Depending on the actual birth weights of these subjects, however, it is possible that their loss did skew our data.

As mentioned previously, we had a very low loss-to-follow-up rate, overall. However, an additional 93 subjects, while not lost to follow-up, did not have measured birth weights. Of these, 49 pregnancies ended before 20 weeks and were considered miscarriages. Of the remaining subjects, 27 were stillbirths, 5 were neonatal deaths, and 12 had unknown status. A final challenge faced in this study is the limited precision of the scales used to determine birth weights. In general, these scales were graduated at 50-g increments. Combined with documented “digit preference” bias from other settings, including within the East African region [49, 50], and for which there might be some anecdotal evidence within our Network [10], this lack of granularity in regards to birthweight measurements limits the interpretation of our results.

Conclusions

Premature birth continues to be a major problem in sub-Saharan Africa, including Kenya. The comparison of our data, with INTERGROWTH-21st results, found preliminary signals that this rural-dwelling population may have birthweight by gestational age percentiles that differ from that currently reported in global data sources. These results further indicate that continued efforts by clinicians and public health practitioners are needed to develop timely, accurate, effective, acceptable, and feasible evidence-based methods to accurately detect and predict regionally-specific rates of fetal growth restriction and low birthweight [15, 51, 52]. Future analysis of rural Kenyan fetal growth curves in relation to perinatal mortality risks and confounding risk factors is warranted. Within low/middle-income settings, this will be an important contribution toward on-going global efforts to reduce overall rates of neonatal mortality [53, 54].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACOG:

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

ASPIRIN Trial:

Aspirin Supplementation for Pregnancy Indicated Risk Reduction In Nulliparas

BW:

Birthweight

DOL:

Day of life

EGA:

Estimated gestational age

EN-INDEPTH:

Every Newborn-International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and their Health 

GA:

Gestational age

INTERGROWTH-21st :

The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century

References

  1. Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E, Kehl S, Schmid M, Schild RL, Beckmann MW, Mayr A. A New Sonographic Weight Estimation Formula for Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(8):1713–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dammer U, Raabe E, Kehl S, Schmid M, Mayr A, Schild RL, Beckmann MW, Faschingbauer F. Sonographic Weight Estimation in Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses. Ultraschall Med. 2015;36(6):630–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiserud T, Piaggio G, Carroli G, Widmer M, Carvalho J, Neerup Jensen L, Giordano D, Cecatti JG, Abdel Aleem H, Talegawkar SA, et al. The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: A Multinational Longitudinal Study of Ultrasound Biometric Measurements and Estimated Fetal Weight. PLoS Med. 2017;14(1):e1002220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, Ohuma EO, Bertino E, Altman DG, Lambert A, Papageorghiou AT, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Frederick IO, Noble AJ, Pang R, Barros FC, Chumlea C, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):857–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60932-6.

  6. Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, Todros T, Ismail LC, Lambert A, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Purwar M et al: International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):869–79.

  7. van den Heuvel TLA, de Bruijn D. Moens-van de Moesdijk D, Beverdam A, van Ginneken B, de Korte CL: Comparison Study of Low-Cost Ultrasound Devices for Estimation of Gestational Age in Resource-Limited Countries. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018;44(11):2250–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Swanson JO, Nathan RO, Swanson DL, Perez KM, Bresnahan BW, Mirza W, Goldenberg RL. Use of ultrasound and mHealth to improve perinatal outcomes in low and middle income countries. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43(5):267–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Georgieff MK, Krebs NF, Cusick SE. The Benefits and Risks of Iron Supplementation in Pregnancy and Childhood. Annu Rev Nutr. 2019;39:121–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Marete I, Ekhaguere O, Bann CM, Bucher SL, Nyongesa P, Patel AB, Hibberd PL, Saleem S, Goldenberg RL, Goudar SS, et al. Regional trends in birth weight in low- and middle-income countries 2013–2018. Reprod Health. 2020;17(Suppl 3):176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Moon M, Baek MJ, Ahn E, Odibo AO. Association between small for gestational age and intrauterine fetal death: comparing a customized South Korean growth standard versus a population-based fetal growth chart. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(6):872–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Larkin JC, Chauhan SP, Simhan HN. Small for Gestational Age: The Differential Mortality When Detected versus Undetected Antenatally. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(4):409–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goto E. Prediction of low birthweight and small for gestational age from symphysis-fundal height mainly in developing countries: a meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(12):999–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman MK, Goudar SS, Kodkany BS, Metgud M, Somannavar M, Okitawutshu J, Lokangaka A, Tshefu A, Bose CL, Mwapule A, et al. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preterm delivery in nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy (ASPIRIN): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10220):285–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Melamed N, Hiersch L, Aviram A, Keating S, Kingdom JC. Customized birth-weight centiles and placenta-related fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(3):409–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stirnemann J, Villar J, Salomon LJ, Ohuma E, Ruyan P, Altman DG, Nosten F, Craik R, Munim S, Cheikh Ismail L, et al. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(4):478–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nwabuobi C, Odibo L, Camisasca-Lopina H, Leavitt K, Tuuli M, Odibo AO. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(11):1906–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffman MK, Goudar SS, Kodkany BS, Goco N, Koso-Thomas M, Miodovnik M, McClure EM, Wallace DD, Hemingway-Foday JJ, Tshefu A, et al. A description of the methods of the aspirin supplementation for pregnancy indicated risk reduction in nulliparas (ASPIRIN) study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bashir IM, Nyakoe N, van der Sande M. Targeting remaining pockets of malaria transmission in Kenya to hasten progress towards national elimination goals: an assessment of prevalence and risk factors in children from the Lake endemic region. Malar J. 2019;18(1):233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. McClure EM, Garces AL, Hibberd PL, Moore JL, Goudar SS, Saleem S, Esamai F, Patel A, Chomba E, Lokangaka A, et al. The Global Network Maternal Newborn Health Registry: a multi-country, community-based registry of pregnancy outcomes. Reprod Health. 2020;17(Suppl 2):184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Committee on Obstetric Practice tAIoUiM. the Society for Maternal-Fetal M: Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(5):e150–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Committee opinion no 611: method for estimating due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):863–6.

  23. Gisore P, Shipala E, Otieno K, Rono B, Marete I, Tenge C, Mabeya H, Bucher S, Moore J, Liechty E, et al. Community based weighing of newborns and use of mobile phones by village elders in rural settings in Kenya: a decentralised approach to health care provision. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12(1):15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. McClure EM, Garces A, Saleem S, Moore JL, Bose CL, Esamai F, Goudar SS, Chomba E, Mwenechanya M, Pasha O, et al. Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research: probable causes of stillbirth in low- and middle-income countries using a prospectively defined classification system. BJOG. 2018;125(2):131–8.

  25. Garces AL, McClure EM, Pérez W, Hambidge KM, Krebs NF, Figueroa L, Bose CL, Carlo WA, Tenge C, Esamai F, Goudar SS, Saleem S, Patel AB, Chiwila M, Chomba E, Tshefu A, Derman RJ, Hibberd PL, Bucher S, Liechty EA, Bauserman M, Moore JL, Koso-Thomas M, Miodovnik M, Goldenberg RL. The Global Network Neonatal Cause of Death algorithm for low-resource settings. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106(6):904–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13805. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

  26. Anderson-Darling Normality Test [https://variation.com/wp-content/distribution_analyzer_help/hs140.htm]

  27. Pusdekar YV, Patel AB, Kurhe KG, Bhargav SR, Thorsten V, Garces A, Goldenberg RL, Goudar SS, Saleem S, Esamai F, et al. Rates and risk factors for preterm birth and low birthweight in the global network sites in six low- and low middle-income countries. Reprod Health. 2020;17(Suppl 3):187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Goto E. Maternal anthropometry to predict small for gestational age: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;203:193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stein Z, Susser M. The Dutch famine, 1944–1945, and the reproductive process. I. Effects on six indices at birth. Pediatric Res. 1975;9(2):70–76.

  30. Stein Z, Susser M: The Dutch famine, 1944–1945, and the reproductive process. II. Interrelations of caloric rations and six indices at birth. Pediatr Res. 1975;9(2):76–83.

  31. Bukowski R. Stillbirth and fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(3):673–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ego A, Monier I, Skaare K, Zeitlin J. Antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and risk of stillbirth: population-based case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(5):613–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Selvaratnam RJ, Wallace EM, Treleaven S, Hooper SB, Davis PG, Davey MA. Does detection of fetal growth restriction improve neonatal outcomes? J Paediatr Child Health. 2021;57(5):677–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fairley JK, Bisanzio D, King CH, Kitron U, Mungai P, Muchiri E, King CL, Malhotra I. Birthweight in offspring of mothers with high prevalence of helminth and malaria infection in coastal Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88(1):48–53. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0371. Epub 2012 Nov 19. Erratum in: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91(6):1284.

  35. Roh ME, Kuile FOT, Rerolle F, Glymour MM, Shiboski S, Gosling R, Gutman J, Kakuru A, Desai M, Kajubi R, et al. Overall, anti-malarial, and non-malarial effect of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on birthweight: a mediation analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(7):e942–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee KK, Bing R, Kiang J, Bashir S, Spath N, Stelzle D, Mortimer K, Bularga A, Doudesis D, Joshi SS, et al. Adverse health effects associated with household air pollution: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and burden estimation study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(11):e1427–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bucher S, Marete I, Tenge C, Liechty E, Esamai F, Patel A, Goudar S, Kodkany B, Garces A, Chomba E, et al. A prospective observational description of frequency and timing of antenatal care attendance and coverage of selected interventions from sites in Argentina, Guatemala, India, Kenya, Pakistan and Zambia. Reprod Health. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tikmani SS, Ali SA, Saleem S, Bann CM, Mwenechanya M, Carlo WA, Figueroa L, Garces AL, Krebs NF, Patel A, et al. Trends of antenatal care during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the global network maternal and newborn health registry. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43(5):297–307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hambidge KM, Bann CM, McClure EM, Westcott JE, Garcés A, Figueroa L, Goudar SS, Dhaded SM, Pasha O, Ali SA, Derman RJ, Goldenberg RL, Koso-Thomas M, Somannavar MS, Herekar V, Khan U, Krebs NF. Maternal Characteristics Affect Fetal Growth Response in the Women First Preconception Nutrition Trial. Nutrients. 2019;11(10):2534. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102534.

  40. Ali SA, Abbasi Z, Shahid B, Moin G, Hambidge KM, Krebs NF, Westcott JE, McClure EM, Goldenberg RL, Saleem S. Prevalence and determinants of anemia among women of reproductive age in Thatta Pakistan: Findings from a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(9):e0239320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Gibson RS, Abebe Y, Stabler S, Allen RH, Westcott JE, Stoecker BJ, Krebs NF, Hambidge KM. Zinc, gravida, infection, and iron, but not vitamin B-12 or folate status, predict hemoglobin during pregnancy in Southern Ethiopia. J Nutr. 2008;138(3):581–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Garces A, MacGuire E, Franklin HL, Alfaro N, Arroyo G, Figueroa L, Goudar SS, Saleem S, Esamai F, Patel A, et al. Looking beyond the numbers: quality assurance procedures in the Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research Maternal Newborn Health Registry. Reprod Health. 2020;17(Suppl 2):159.

  43. Swanson JO, Plotner D, Franklin HL, Swanson DL, LokombaBolamba V, Lokangaka A, Sayury Pineda I, Figueroa L, Garces A, Muyodi D, et al. Web-Based Quality Assurance Process Drives Improvements in Obstetric Ultrasound in 5 Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Global Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(4):675–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nathan RO, Swanson JO, Swanson DL, McClure EM, Bolamba VL, Lokangaka A, Pineda IS, Figueroa L, Lopez-Gomez W, Garces A, et al. Evaluation of Focused Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations by Health Care Personnel in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017;46(3):210–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Nnaji HC, Asimadu EE, Aniebue UU. The effect of short interpregnancy interval on birthweight and other pregnancy outcomes in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(2):244–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2021.1904230. Epub 2021 May 24.

  46. Blencowe H, Bottecchia M, Kwesiga D, Akuze J, Haider MM, Galiwango E, Dzabeng F, Fisker AB, Enuameh YAK, Geremew BM, et al. Stillbirth outcome capture and classification in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study. Popul Health Metr. 2021;19(Suppl 1):13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Mills TA, Ayebare E, Mukhwana R, Mweteise J, Nabisere A, Nendela A, Ndungu P, Okello M, Omoni G, Wakasiaka S, et al. Parents’ experiences of care and support after stillbirth in rural and urban maternity facilities: a qualitative study in Kenya and Uganda. BJOG. 2021;128(1):101–9.

  48. Ayebare E, Lavender T, Mweteise J, Nabisere A, Nendela A, Mukhwana R, Wood R, Wakasiaka S, Omoni G, Kagoda BS, et al. The impact of cultural beliefs and practices on parents’ experiences of bereavement following stillbirth: a qualitative study in Uganda and Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):443.

  49. Emmerson AJ, Roberts SA. Rounding of birth weights in a neonatal intensive care unit over 20 years: an analysis of a large cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(12):e003650.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Mmbando BP, Cole-Lewis H, Sembuche S, Kamugisha ML, Theander T, Lusingu JP, Lemnge MM. Risk factors for low birth-weight in areas with varying malaria transmission in Korogwe, Tanzania: implications for malaria control. Tanzan J Health Res. 2008;10(3):137–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nicolaides KH, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Wright A, Akolekar R. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):44–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rallis D, Karagianni P, Papaharalambous E, Lithoxopoulou M, Chatziioannidis I, Soubasi-Griva V. Customized compared to population-based centiles for detecting term small for gestational age infants in Greece. Hippokratia. 2020;24(3):133–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Bruin C, Damhuis S, Gordijn S, Ganzevoort W. Evaluation and Management of Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021;48(2):371–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nardozza LM, Caetano AC, Zamarian AC, Mazzola JB, Silva CP, Marcal VM, Lobo TF, Peixoto AB, Araujo Junior E. Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(5):1061–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the women who consented to participate in this study, and to the leaders, communities, and health facilities in Western Kenya with whom we collaborate to improve maternal-newborn-child health.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (grant number 5UG1HD076461-10).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Sherri Bucher, Osayame A. Ekhaguere & Edward A. Liechty

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Sherri Bucher

  3. RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA

    Kayla Nowak

  4. Department of Child Health and Paediatrics, Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya

    Kevin Otieno, Constance Tenge, Irene Marete, Faith Rutto, Millsort Kemboi, Emmah Achieng, Paul Nyongesa & Fabian O. Esamai

Authors
  1. Sherri Bucher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kayla Nowak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kevin Otieno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Constance Tenge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Irene Marete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Faith Rutto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Millsort Kemboi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Emmah Achieng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Osayame A. Ekhaguere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Paul Nyongesa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Fabian O. Esamai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Edward A. Liechty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SB and EL served as the US-based co-PIs for the study, and drafted the manuscript, including the narrative sections, tables, and figures. SB was responsible for obtaining human ethics approval from Indiana University. KN performed statistical analysis and helped draft the Methods and Results section, including revision of tables and figures. KO provided overall study coordination for the Global Network site in Kenya, and served as the Senior Data Manager for the study. CT and IM serve as co-Investigators for the study, as well as for the Maternal Newborn Health Registry. They oversaw study operations, particularly in regards to ensuring that all participating village elders and health facilities had operational weighing scales. FR was the Cluster Coordinator and organized all study operations, as well as monitored the quality assurance procedures for the Maternal Newborn Registry attendants and quality assurance personnel. MK was the field-based data manager and statistician. EA was the ASPIRIN Trial study coordinator, and provided supervision for all study personnel under the direction of the Senior Foreign Investigator, FE. EA was also responsible for ensuring that the ultrasonography quality assurance milestones were attained, and maintained for the duration of the study period. OE served as a co-Investigator, and provided clinical technical assistance on the project in regards to newborn health. PN was the Kenyan-based co-PI on the study, and oversaw all study operations, Moi University ethical approvals, and data collection under the direction of FE. FE serves as the Senior Foreign Investigator for the IU-Kenya Global Network site. He is responsible for all Kenya-based study operations, including fiscal matters, human study ethics approvals, data collection, data analysis, and dissemination of research products. All authors reviewed the final manuscript, and provide approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherri Bucher.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board (#1507246903) and the Moi University Institutional Research Ethics Committee (#0001429). The research study was conducted in accordance with all the relevant guidelines and regulations regarding protection of human populations, including pregnant women, fetuses, and newborns. No research was conducted in regards to embryos, gametes, or stem cells. All adult participants provided written informed consent for themselves and their infants to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bucher, S., Nowak, K., Otieno, K. et al. Birth weight and gestational age distributions in a rural Kenyan population. BMC Pediatr 23, 112 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03925-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03925-2

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us