Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between vitamin D level in mother’s serum and the level of vitamin D in the serum of pre-term infants

BMC Pediatrics volume 23, Article number: 97 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency is common in mothers and infants. The present study was conducted with the aim of association between the level of vitamin D in the mother’s serum and the level of vitamin D in the serum of preterm infants.

Method

The present descriptive – analytical study was performed on 140 mothers and preterm infants referred to the Kamali hospital in Alborz University of Medical Sciences. Sampling was done from available mothers after hospitalization for delivery and their infants during the first 72 hours after delivery. Information from mothers and infants were collected with researcher made check list, including age, type of delivery, number of pregnancies, vitamin D during this pregnancy, infants birth age, gender, and birth weight. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 24 software.

Results

The average age of mothers was 28 ± 5 years and the average age of infants at the time of birth was 30 ± 1 weeks. Forty two infants (67%) were boys and 23 infants (33%) were girls. The results showed a high rate of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in mother (44, 49%) and preterm infants (49, 38%). The results of the Pearson correlation test showed that there is a strong and significant relationship between the serum vitamin D level of mothers and preterm infants (P = 0.001). Logistic regression tests showed that mother’s vitamin D level had an effect on the infant’s vitamin D level.

Conclusion

Considering high rate of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency and relationship between vitamin D in preterm infants serum and mothers, diagnostic screenings are recommended to investigate vitamin D disorders in pregnant mothers, which should be planned, implemented and followed up in the form of a therapeutic program to prevent the occurrence of complications caused by this disorder in the mother and infant.

Peer Review reports

Background

Vitamin D has a very important role for the development of the fetus during the stages of cell proliferation, differentiation and maturation [1]. Optimal concentrations of vitamin D may influence early organogenesis and subsequently affect health status [2]. Also, vitamin D is critical for placental function, calcium homeostasis and bone mineralization, all of which are important factors for fetal growth and development [3]. During pregnancy, the serum level of vitamin D increases two times at 10-12 weeks pregnancy and reaches the maximum level in the third trimester [4]. However, due to the increase in the active form of vitamin D, pregnant women are probably exposed to more cells with vitamin D during the second and third trimesters, which suggests the role of vitamin D in the well-being of women [5]. In infancy, severe vitamin D deficiency with hypocalcemia can lead to convulsions in infants, and it has also been seen that low vitamin D concentration in umbilical cord blood has been associated with increased incidence of neonatal sepsis and respiratory tract infections in the first year of life [6]. Perinatal results suggest the hypothesis related to the role of vitamin D in the occurrence of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, cesarean section, infectious diseases, low birth weight and preterm delivery [7, 8]. Preterm birth is the most important cause of death in children under 5 years of age [9]. It is estimated that 11% of all annual births in the world are preterm, and 1 million of every 6 million preterm newborns die from complications of prematurity. Twenty seven percent of all births in low- and middle-income countries are preterm for gestational age [10]. Preterm delivery is associated with bad health outcomes such as increased infant mortality, nutritional disorders, children’s vision and hearing, and metabolic diseases in adulthood [11]. Risk factors for preterm delivery include African-American race, poverty, young maternal age, obesity, and vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D status in the fetus and newborn is largely determined by the vitamin D status of the mother [12]. According to the studies, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the general population is very important, and pregnancy is one of the known risk factors for this deficiency, and in general, vitamin D deficiency has been reported between 47 and 83% in black and white pregnant women, respectively [13].

Since vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in mothers, many infants are also at risk of deficiency and insufficiency of vitamin D levels. Researchers have recently shown an adverse role of low vitamin D levels in health status beyond calcium metabolism and bone health, such as health status during pregnancy and in infancy and childhood [14]. Animal studies have shown that vitamin D may be important in lung development [15]. This factor is very important for preterm infants due to the high risk of chronic lung disease. The potential long-term public health impact of preventing vitamin D deficiency is being evident, especially at this critical time [16].

Since investigating the causes of preterm birth and identifying modifiable risk factors for this adverse birth outcome is necessary [17], in the present study, the relationship between vitamin D level in mother and preterm infants is investigated.

Method

Study design

The present descriptive – analytical study was performed after obtaining written permission from the Ethics Committee with the code IR.ABZUMS.REC.1399.235 on 140 mothers and pre-term infants referred to Kamali Medical Education Center in Alborz University of Medical Sciences. Sampling was done from mothers after hospitalization for delivery and from their infants during the first 72 hours after delivery. Serum levels of vitamin D in mother before delivery were measured by immunological and biochemical methods by sampling 2 ml of venous blood. In addition, the serum levels of vitamin D of infants were measured in the first 72 hours after delivery by immunological and biochemical methods by sampling 2 ml of venous blood. In this study, according to the guidelines of the International Endocrine Society, vitamin D deficiency was defined as a serum level less than 20 ng/ml, insufficiency was defined as 21-29 ng/ml, and its normal level was at least 30 ng/ml.

Study population

Eligible criteria for entering the study were:

  • Mothers with preterm infants less than 32 weeks;

  • A healthy infant born with an age less than or equal to 32 weeks of pregnancy;

Exclusion criteria were:

  • Parents’ unwillingness to cooperate, infant’s death immediately after birth, mothers with known underlying liver, kidney or heart diseases, taking drugs affecting calcium and vitamin D metabolism in the mother, chromosomal or congenital abnormalities of infants.

Sample size

In this study, the sample size was determined based on Panda et al.’s study and the main goal was to determine the relationship between the serum vitamin D level of mothers and the serum vitamin D level of preterm infants [18]. The error level is 5% and the statistical power is 95%. Based on the sample size calculation formula to find correlation (according to the sample size calculation formula, the sample size is 15 preterm infants and 15 mothers) and also considering the minimum sample required to perform parametric analyzes of the minimum sample size, 30 mothers and 30 preterm infants were calculated. The sample size of this study was 70 mothers and 70 preterm infants.

The standard normal deviate for α = Zα = 1.960.

The standard normal deviate for β = Zβ = 0.842

$$\textrm{C}=0.5\ast \ln \left[\left(1+\textrm{r}\right)/\left(1-\textrm{r}\right)\right]=0.793$$
$$\mathrm{Total}\;\mathrm{sample}\;\mathrm{size}=\mathrm N=\;\lbrack(Z\mathrm\alpha+\mathrm{Z\beta})/\mathrm C\rbrack2\;+\;3\;=\;15$$

Study questionnaire

The data collection tool in this study was a researcher made checklist to collect the demographic information of the mother and the infant and information on the time of delivery, including age, type of delivery, number of pregnancies, vitamin D and calcium supplementation during this pregnancy, and newborn information including birth age, gender, and birth weight. The content of this check list was confirmed by 10 faculty member of neonatology department.

Sampling method

Sampling method was convenient, after the approval of the Vice-Chancellor of Research and the Ethics Committee of Alborz University of Medical Sciences, pregnant mothers with preterm delivery of less than 32 weeks were selected as available and after explaining the objectives of the study, the confidentiality of information were confirmed and informed consent was obtained.

Data analysis method

The data was analyzed using SPSS version 24 software. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine the normal distribution of the data. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine correlation and logistic regression was performed in order to determine the effect of demographic factors on vitamin D levels.

Results

The average age of mothers was 28 ± 5 years and the minimum and maximum age was 18 and 37 years. The average age of infants at the time of their birth was 30 ± 1 week, and the minimum and maximum ages were 27 and 31 weeks. 47 infants (67.1%) were boys and 23 infants (32.9%) were girls. Regarding the use of vitamin D supplements during pregnancy, 6 mothers (9%) had taken vitamin D supplements. The level of vitamin D and calcium in mothers and infants is mentioned in Table 1. Also, the results of Pearson’s correlation test showed that there is a strong and significant relationship between the serum level of vitamin D of mothers and preterm infants (Table 1).

Table 1 Vitamin D level of mother and infant
Full size table

Logistic regression was used to determine the effect of gender (boy), mother’s age, fetal age, mother’s vitamin D level, vitamin D supplement use during pregnancy and birth weight of infants on the probability of vitamin D level of more than 20 ng/ml in infants. Table 2 shows that the logistic regression model was significant only for the vitamin D level of mothers (P < 0.05).

Table 2 Logistic regression to determine the effect of non-dependent variables in predicting the probability of a level of more than 20 ng/ml of vitamin Din preterm infants
Full size table

Discussion

The findings from this study showed that 49% of mothers had vitamin D deficiency and 44% had vitamin D insufficiency. 38% of infants had vitamin D deficiency and 49% had vitamin D insufficiency. In Fallahi et al.’s study [13], the average level of vitamin D in infants was 13.7 ng and 56% of infants were vitamin D deficient.

Panda et al. [18] demonstrated that the level of vitamin D was 54.4 (36-70.7) n mol in mothers and 18.2% of mothers had vitamin D deficiency and 21.8% had insufficient vitamin D level. Also, the level of vitamin D at the time of birth of infants was 57 (42-70) and the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in 72 days after delivery was reported as 30%.

Hajizadeh and et al. showed the high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in the pregnant women of the Middle East underscores and they suggested the necessity of implementing national prevention and intervention strategies. A clear policy for clinicians and healthcare workers is needed for screening and maintaining sufficient vitamin D status during pregnancy [19].

In the present study, the Pearson correlation coefficient for the serum level of vitamin D in mothers and infants shows a strong and significant relationship between the serum level of vitamin D in mothers and preterm infants. In this context, Skouroliakou et al. reported a strong and significant correlation between the serum level of vitamin D in mothers and preterm infants, which confirms the results of the present study [20]. In the study of Mafinejad et al., a strong and significant relationship was demonstrated between serum levels of vitamin D in mothers and preterm infants, which is in line with the results of the present study. Similarly, a strong and significant relationship was also reported by Kassai et al. and Park et al. between serum levels of vitamin D in mothers and preterm infants [21,22,23]. Results of systematic review showed Maternal and newborn vitamin D level have correlation [24].

Results of another study showed that there is a strong mother/infant vitamin D relationship that affects vitamin D status during pregnancy and in infancy. Vitamin D deficiency is a universal health problem is a basis on which to improve guideline to reduce the outcome of maternal and infant vitamin D deficiency [25].

Logistic regression test was performed to determine the effect of gender (boy), mother’s age, fetal age, mother’s vitamin D level, vitamin D supplement use during pregnancy and birth weight of the on the infant’s vitamin D level, and the findings showed that only the mother’s vitamin D level more than 20 ng/ml affects the vitamin D level in infants.

Nakhaee and et al. showed that infants’ boy, low mothers’ vitamin D status, inadequate mothers’ receiving vitamin D supplementation, and high mothers’ parity are correlated with infant’s vitamin D status [26].

In this field, in the study of Skouroliakou et al., the logistic regression model showed the effect of mothers’ serum vitamin D level in predicting the level of more than 20 ng/ml of vitamin D in preterm infants, which confirms the results of the present study [20].

The results of the present study showed that the age of the mother is not significant for predicting the sufficient level of vitamin D in preterm infants, but in a study [27], higher levels of vitamin D in preterm infants of mothers over 30 years of age were reported. Considering the average age of mothers and their age range, this relationship may not be determined in the present study.

The results of the present study showed that the mean and frequency of vitamin D status of infants did not differ in terms of gender, which was also reported in the study of Skouroliakou et al. [20].

The present study demonstrated that the average birth weight of preterm infants in the present study was not statistically different according to the vitamin D status of the mothers. Because of the influence of various factors on birth weight, different results are reported. Wang et al. [28] showed the relationship between vitamin D and birth weight, so that for one nanogram increase in the amount of vitamin D, head circumference (0.31 cm) and the birth weight (69 g) are increased. Results of a trial study showed consumption maternal vitamin D supplement from two trimester of pregnancy until 6 months postpartum did not improve fetal or infant growth [29].

Kiely and et al. in a study showed that there were no associations between cord vitamin D and birth weight or any anthropometric measures at birth [30].

The results of the present study showed that there was no significant relationship between the consumption of vitamin D supplements by mother during pregnancy and the prediction of the normal level of vitamin D in preterm infants.

Roda (2015) in a clinical study reported that the use of vitamin D supplements by mothers in the intervention group increases vitamin D in the infant’s umbilical cord. The serum level of vitamin D in the infants of the intervention group was twice that of the control group [31].

Results of a study showed that Daily vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and then infancy with 1000/400 IU or 2000/800 IU increases the proportion of infants with vitamin D ≥ 20 ng/mL, with the higher dose sustaining this increase for longer [32]. Hollis and et al. in a study showed that consumption of vitamin D supplementation of 4000 IU/d during pregnancy is safe and effective in level of vitamin D sufficiency in all women and their neonates [33, 34]. The present study was not consistent, which could be due to the fact that only 9% of the participants of the present study used vitamin D supplements. And also infant in this study was born preterm that might be effect the results of study.

Consumption of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has been studied since the past but decision making about vitamin D’s effects during pregnancy, dose and timing of supplementation are not clear [35].

Screening of vitamin D during pregnancy is an effective way in recognition of vitamin D deficiency and improving vitamin D levels [8].

The limitations of the present study include the limitation of the sample size and lack of examination of mothers’ diet, which plays a role in the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency. The second limitation was the lack of access to the mother’s vitamin D level at the beginning of pregnancy.

Conclusion

The findings of the present study showed a high rate of insufficiency and deficiency of vitamin D in mothers and preterm infants. On the other hand, the serum level of vitamin D of the mother and the preterm infant had a strong and significant relationship, and the only predictor of the appropriate level of vitamin D in preterm infants was the level of vitamin D in the mother’s serum. Hence, diagnostic screenings are recommended to investigate vitamin D disorders in pregnant mothers, which should be planned, implemented and followed up in the form of a therapeutic and diagnostic program to prevent the occurrence of complications caused by this disorder in the mother and infant.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Tous M, Villalobos M, Iglesias L, et al. Vitamin D status during pregnancy and offspring outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74:36–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0373-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang SW, Lee HC. Vitamin D and health – the missing vitamin in humans. Pediatr Neonatol. 2019;60:237–44 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31101452/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eremkina AK, Mokrysheva NG, Pigarova EA, Mirnaya SS. Vitamin D: effects on pregnancy, maternal, fetal and postnatal outcomes. Ter Arkh. 2018;90(10):115–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harvey NC, Holroyd C, Ntani G, Javaid K, Cooper P, Moon R, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2014;18(45):1–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Urrutia RP, Thorp JM. Vitamin D in pregnancy: current concepts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24(2):57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Vinkhuyzen AA, Eyles DW, Burne TH, Blanken LM, Kruithof CJ, Verhulst F, et al. Prevalence and predictors of vitamin D deficiency based on maternal mid-gestation and neonatal cord bloods: the generation R study. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;164:161–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Curtis EM, Moon RJ, Harvey NC, Cooper C. Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. Br Med Bull. 2018;126(1):57–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rostami M, Ramezani Tehrani F, Simbar M, Bidhendi Yarandi R, Minooee S, Hollis BW, et al. Effectiveness of prenatal vitamin D deficiency screening and treatment program: a stratified randomized field trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(8):2936–48. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee AC, Blencowe H, Lawn JE. Small babies, big numbers: global estimates of preterm birth. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(1):e2–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Global burden of prematurity. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(2):74–9 WB Saunders.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merialdi M, Kozuki N, Katz J, Lee A, Vogel JP, Silveira MF, et al. Maternal stature increases risk of small-forgestational-age and preterm births in low-and middle-income countries: individual participant data meta-analysis and population attributable fraction. J Nutr. 2015;145(11):2542–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamal S, Srivastava R. A retrospective analytical study of the epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(12):5453–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fallahi M, Afjeh A, Saneifard H, Namazi N, Kazemian M, Tabatabaee S. Comparison of vitamin D level in preterm and term infant–mother pairs: a brief study. Iran J Neonatol. 2016;7(1):32–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ni M, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Shen Q, Yao D, Wang T, et al. Relationship between maternal vitamin D status in the first trimester of pregnancy and maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single center study. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gatera VA, Abdulah R, Musfiroh I, Judistiani RT, Setiabudiawan B. Updates on the status of vitamin D as a risk factor for respiratory distress syndrome. Adv Pharmacol Sci. 2018;2018:8494816.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zosky GR, Berry LJ, Elliot JG, James AL, Gorman S, Hart PH. Vitamin D deficiency causes deficits in lung function and alters lung structure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(10):1336–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shahraki AD, Hasanabadi MS, Dehkordi AF. Association of 25-hydroxy vitamin D level in mothers with term and preterm delivery and their neonates. J Res Med Sci. 2020;25:21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Panda M, McIntosh J, Chaudhari T, Kent AL. Do maternal vitamin D levels influence vitamin D levels in preterm neonates? Int J Pediatr. 2019;2019:8613414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hajizadeh S, Shary JR, Reed SG, Wagner CL. The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D and its risk factors in pregnant women and their newborns in the Middle East: a systematic review. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019;17(10):685.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Skouroliakou M, Ntountaniotis D, Massara P, Koutri K. Investigation of multiple factors which may contribute to vitamin D levels of bedridden pregnant women and their preterm neonates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(16):2596–601.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mafinezhad S, Sharifian E, Bayani G, Bozorgnia Y, Ahmadabad HN, Kalateh A. Serum level of vitamin D in women with idiopathic preterm labor and women with term labor referred to Bentolhoda hospital in Bojnourd, 2020. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2022;24(13):1–8 [Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. Park SH, Lee GM, Moon JE, Kim HM. Severe vitamin D deficiency in preterm infants: maternal and neonatal clinical features. Korean J Pediatr. 2015;58(11):427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kassai MS, Cafeo FR, Affonso-Kaufman FA, Suano-Souza FI, Sarni RO. Vitamin D plasma concentrations in pregnant women and their preterm newborns. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saraf R, Morton SM, Camargo CA Jr, Grant CC. Global summary of maternal and newborn vitamin D status–a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12(4):647–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dawodu A, Wagner CL. Prevention of vitamin D deficiency in mothers and infants worldwide—a paradigm shift. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2012;32(1):3–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakhaee Moghadam M, Soleimani G, Shafighi Shahri E, Akbarirad F. Evaluation of vitamin D status and effective maternal factors on vitamin D levels in cord blood of infants born in Zahedan. Iran Int J Pediatr. 2021;9(5):13455–62.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Christina KH, Ertl R, Samaha R, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Normal range of maternal serum vitamin D at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;30(2):94–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang H, Xiao Y, Zhang L, Gao Q. Maternal early pregnancy vitamin D status in relation to low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age offspring. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;175:146–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roth DE, Morris SK, Zlotkin S, Gernand AD, Ahmed T, Shanta SS, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and lactation and infant growth. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):535–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kiely M, O’Donovan SM, Kenny LC, Hourihane JO, Irvine AD, Murray DM. Vitamin D metabolite concentrations in umbilical cord blood serum and associations with clinical characteristics in a large prospective mother-infant cohort in Ireland. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;167:162–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodda CP, Benson JE, Vincent AJ, Whitehead CL, Polykov A, Vollenhoven B. Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy prevents vitamin D deficiency in the newborn: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Clin Endocrinol. 2015;83(3):363–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Grant CC, Stewart AW, Scragg R, Milne T, Rowden J, Ekeroma A, et al. Vitamin D during pregnancy and infancy and infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):e143–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hollis BW, Johnson D, Hulsey TC, Ebeling M, Wagner CL. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: double-blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and effectiveness. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(10):2341–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hollis BW, Wagner CL. Vitamin D and pregnancy: skeletal effects, non-skeletal effects, and birth outcomes. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;92(2):128–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hollis BW, Wagner CL. Substantial vitamin D supplementation is required during the prenatal period to improve birth outcomes. Nutrients. 2022;14(4):899.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Vice-Chancellor for Research, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, for their cooperation, as well as all the participants.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

    Alireza Jashni Motlagh

  2. Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

    Ahmadreza Davoodvandi

  3. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

    Sara Esmaelzadeh Saeieh

Authors
  1. Alireza Jashni Motlagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmadreza Davoodvandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Esmaelzadeh Saeieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SES conceived and designed the study and analyzed data. AJM contributed to the study design and conducted the analysis. AD collected the data, SES, AJM and AD wrote the primary draft of paper. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Esmaelzadeh Saeieh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Alborz University of Medical Sciences with code (IR.ABZUMS.REC.1399.235). The study was conducted following the Helsinki declaration. The participants received written and oral information about the study, and written informed consent was obtained from them. They were free to decline participation or to withdraw at any time.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Motlagh, A.J., Davoodvandi, A. & Saeieh, S.E. Association between vitamin D level in mother’s serum and the level of vitamin D in the serum of pre-term infants. BMC Pediatr 23, 97 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03854-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03854-0

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us