Skip to main content

Pseudoaneurysm of the brachial artery in an infant due to vaccination: a case report



Pseudoaneurysm is a known complication of penetrating arterial injuries such as catheterization, gunshot wounds, and open fractures. Vaccination is an effective method for preventing multiple, serious, infectious diseases in children. Common adverse reactions related to vaccination include fever, swelling, redness, and pain. Brachial pseudoaneurysm after vaccination has not been previously reported.

Case presentation

Herein we describe a novel case of brachial pseudoaneurysm after vaccination in a child aged 1 year and 3 months. A pulsatile mass was formed in the medial left arm of the infant 10 days after vaccination at a community hospital and gradually grew larger. Preoperative images depicted an eccentric aneurysm in the brachial artery and a swirling flow pattern in the mass. The pseudoaneurysm was excised, and vein graft interpositioning was successfully performed. There were no short-term or long-term complications during the follow-up period.


Brachial pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of vaccination via intramuscular injection. Medical staff should avoid puncture wounds to the brachial artery during vaccination, especially in infants.

Peer Review reports


Pseudoaneurysm is caused by a wide variety of paravascular infectious, inflammatory, and traumatic processes such as tuberculous lymph nodes, mycotic infection [1], adjacent abscess [2], pancreatitis [3], angiography, artery puncture [4], and endovascular surgeries. Pseudoaneurysms as a result of trauma reportedly occur in less than 0.5% of patients [5]. Pseudoaneurysms of the brachial artery are even rarer and are usually a result of either trauma or iatrogenic injury.

Vaccination is a necessary and safe method for preventing numerous, serious infectious diseases in infants. There are three main types of injected vaccination: intradermal, subcutaneous, and intramuscular. Adverse reactions related to vaccination include fever, redness, swelling, local pain, headache, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, allergic response, and systemic infection. Pseudoaneurysm arising from vaccination has never been reported. Herein, we report an unusual pseudoaneurysm of the brachial artery in an infant due to vaccination. In addition to the age of the patient, the case is notable due to the associated mechanism of injury—vaccination. This case report describes a new, possible, adverse reaction during vaccination, especially in pediatric patients.

Case presentation

A child aged 1 year and 3 months was presented with a pulsatile mass in the proximal medial left arm. Two months prior, the infant had been vaccinated against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) at a community hospital. The vaccine had been administered in the proximal lateral left arm via intramuscular injection, and there were no complications at the time of vaccination. Ten days later, the patient exhibited a pulsatile mass in the proximal medial left arm. Thereafter, the mass gradually became larger. With increasing prominence of the mass, the parents visited our hospital for treatment. The patient did not undergo any related treatment before admission.

The infant was well developed, and the results of cardiopulmonary examination were normal. Physical examination revealed a non-tender, pulsatile mass in the medial left arm measuring 3 cm × 2 cm, with a clear boundary. The skin on the surface of the mass was intact, without redness or damage (Fig. 1A). Peripheral pulses were fully detectable, and there were no clinical signs of numbness in the fingertips. Left upper limb motion was normal. No trauma had been encountered after vaccination; no invasive procedure had been performed; and there was no family history of aneurysm or congenital cardiovascular disorders.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Preoperative examination of the patient. A A mass can be seen under the skin in the medial left arm. B Digital subtraction angiography revealed an eccentric aneurysm in the brachial artery. C Doppler ultrasonography revealed a cystic mass measuring 2.62 cm × 1.61 cm. D Swirling flow pattern in the mass was confirmed with thrombus adherent to the wall of the mass. E Preoperative ultrasound measurement of pseudoaneurysm neck is very thin, ~ 0.2 cm in length. F Preoperative ultrasound measurement of normal segment brachial artery diameter—0.25 cm

Electrocardiography, chest roentgenography, and echocardiography did not reveal any evidence of cardiac disease. Blood tests were normal. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) revealed an eccentric aneurysm in the brachial artery (Fig. 1B). Doppler ultrasonography revealed a cystic mass measuring 2.62 cm × 1.61 cm (Fig. 1C). The cystic mass had arterial flow with a neck that could be traced back to the brachial artery. A swirling flow pattern was evident in the mass, and there was a thrombus adherent to the wall of the mass (Fig. 1D). The wall of the mass was thicker than the artery wall. Hence, the diagnosis was brachial pseudoaneurysm. This patient’s pseudoaneurysm communicated with the brachial artery via a short neck (Fig. 1E), and the aneurysm had a high degree of enlargement compared to the normal diameter (Fig. 1F). Although the patient was only 1 year and 3 months old, we decided to perform surgery to prevent the pseudoaneurysm from getting bigger or bursting.

Open surgery was conducted under general anesthesia. The patient was placed in the supine position with the arm abducted. An incision was made along the medial upper arm. A cystic and eccentric brachial aneurysm was detected just under the median nerve, which was squeezed and stretched by the aneurysm (Fig. 2A). The aneurysm was carefully separated and excised under control of the proximal and distal brachial artery (Fig. 2B), and the nerve compression was relieved during this process. The mass was dissected through the surface and contained blood and a mural thrombus adherent to its wall (Fig. 2C). On close inspection, a faint trace of trauma to the wall was evident in the tissue surrounding the brachial artery. A 3-cm-long reversed graft from the great saphenous vein was interposed between the cut ends of the brachial artery (Fig. 2D). The excised mass was evaluated histopathologically. According to the pathological report, the excised cystic mass had an outer wall formed by fibrous tissue hyperplasia, which was consistent with the diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Surgical findings. A The mass was just under the median nerve. The median nerve was squeezed and stretched by the mass. B The mass was carefully separated and connected to the brachial artery. C The mass was dissected through the surface, with a mural thrombus found adherent to the wall. D A 3-cm-long reversed graft of the great saphenous vein was interposed between the cut ends of the brachial artery

The surgery was successful. Dressings were changed every 2 days. The patient did not experience any complications during hospitalization. Histopathologic evaluation of the mass indicated inflammatory infiltration, hyalinization, and regions of hematoma beside the vessel wall lumen (Fig. 3), which confirmed injury to the vessel. Injury to the vascular wall led to the formation of a pseudoaneurysm. Blood flow through the reconstructed artery was smooth. Postoperative Doppler ultrasonography at 1 week revealed 100% patency of the brachial artery except for partial stenosis and local inflammation around the reconstructed area (Fig. 4A). The peak systolic velocity of the reconstructed artery was substantially faster than that of the distal ulnar artery and normal brachial artery at 1 week.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Hematoxylin-eosin staining of the mass (scale bar = 50 μm, 40X magnification of camera lens). The result shows inflammatory infiltration, hyalinization, and regions of hematoma in addition to the vessel wall lumen

Fig. 4
figure 4

Postoperative Doppler ultrasonography results. A Partial stenosis and local inflammation around the reconstructed artery was seen at 1 week after surgery. B The artery stenosis and inflammation around the artery disappeared at 5 months. C Homogeneous and stable blood flow in the reconstructed brachial artery was seen without stenosis at 1 year

The patient was presented regularly for follow-up evaluation. No numbness, muscle atrophy, or ischemia were identified. Examination of the reconstructed artery at 5 months indicated that artery stenosis and inflammation around the artery had disappeared (Fig. 4B), and peak systolic velocity had returned to normal. The parameters of the artery were essentially unchanged at 1 year of age (Fig. 4C). No sequelae were reported during the late period. The parents were satisfied with the result. Based on the latest follow-up results, we mapped the postoperative changes of the grafted vessels. The diameter of the graft segment was dilated compared to the right healthy brachial artery (Fig. 5A), while the blood flow velocity was basically the same as the right side (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Follow-up ultrasound measurements of the graft segment vein and right healthy brachial artery at 5 days, 4 months, 1 year, 2.5 years, and 3.5 years after surgery. A Ultrasound measurement of graft diameter; B ultrasound measurements of blood velocity

Discussion and conclusions

Hib vaccine prevents meningitis, pneumonia, epiglottitis, and other serious infections caused by the Hib bacterium. It is usually injected into the deltoid muscle. According to the guidelines for Hib vaccination from the Center for Disease Control, common adverse reactions include swelling, redness, and pain; systemic reactions such as fever and irritability are infrequent, and serious reactions are rare. In a report on adverse events after Hib vaccination, other outcomes included pyrexia, vomiting, convulsions, irritability, intussusception, diarrhea, crying, hypotonia, lethargy, and apnea [6]. Pseudoaneurysm as an adverse reaction associated with Hib vaccination has never been reported.

Aneurysm refers to the weakening of an artery wall that creates a bulge or distention of the artery. Most aneurysms are asymptomatic and are not dangerous. At their most severe stage, however, some can rupture, leading to life-threatening, internal bleeding. Aneurysms occurring in children are rare and usually occur in the thoracic or abdominal aorta [7]. Nonaortic arterial aneurysms in children are rarer and have been associated with neurofibromatosis [8], Kawasaki disease [9], periarteritis nodosa [10], and giant cell arteritis [11].

Pseudoaneurysm is a collection of flowing blood that communicates with the arterial lumen and is filled only by the adventitia or surrounding soft tissue. It is a known complication of penetrating arterial injuries such as catheterization, gunshot wounds, and fractures [12]. It may take days, months, or even years to become symptomatic or be detected clinically. Symptoms are usually limited to the mass effect of the lesion and can include tenderness, pain, and swelling. Complications related to peripheral artery pseudoaneurysm include local pain, rupture, neuropathy, local limb ischemia, and even limb loss [13]. In medical practice, iatrogenic arterial injury should be avoided as much as possible to reduce the occurrence of serious complications such as pseudoaneurysm. Although vaccination does not typically affect the arteries, the operator’s knowledge of the anatomy of the vaccination site is still important. In particular, because infants are small, the distance between the brachial artery and the deltoid muscle is relatively short. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the technical training of vaccination operators to avoid related iatrogenic injuries.

Pseudoaneurysm can be diagnosed via Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography, DSA, and magnetic resonance angiography [14]. Doppler ultrasonography can reveal the presence of blood flow or thrombi within the pseudoaneurysm, the size of the neck of the pseudoaneurysm, the integrity of adjacent vessels, and the presence of loculations. Moreover, it is a useful modality during patient follow-up after treatment because it is rapid, convenient, and inexpensive. Computed tomography angiography and DSA can depict the vasculature in different ways, but intravascular contrast medium is required. Magnetic resonance angiography is also a preferred method for diagnostic evaluations of pediatric vascular diseases due to its high image resolution, lack of arterial invasion, and absence of radiation exposure. However, it is comparatively expensive and inconvenient.

Pseudoaneurysm treatments include conservative measures, sonographically guided compression, embolization, and open surgery. Sonographically guided compression was introduced in 1991 and involves the placement of an ultrasound probe directly over the neck of the pseudoaneurysm in conjunction with the application of prolonged compression, thereby producing vascular stasis within the lumen and promoting thrombosis [15]. Although it is noninvasive and its success rate is approximately 90%, the procedure is often painful for patients and uncomfortable for operators, time-consuming, and occasionally unsuccessful [16]. Sonographically guided thrombin injection was used extensively after its introduction in 1997 because of its high success rate, minimal patient discomfort, and immediate results. It involved percutaneous injection of thrombin into the lumen under sonographic guidance. Although success rates ranged from 91 to 100%, the fear of embolic and thrombotic complications hindered the primary use of this method [17]. It was suggested that compression should be used as the first-line treatment and that thrombin injection should be reserved as a backup. Open surgery includes resection, ligation, reanastomosis, or vein graft interpositioning [18].

Vein graft interpositioning was preferred in the current case due to the size and rapid expansion of the pseudoaneurysm. Fortunately, the operation was performed in time, which enabled the squeezed median nerve to be released, thus avoiding further damage. Long-term follow-up indicated that the surgery was effective and without obvious complications.

In the present case, preoperative image reports, intraoperative surgical findings, and postoperative pathological examination all confirmed the existence of brachial pseudoaneurysm. Because the infant did not suffer from any hereditary disease and had not experienced any other iatrogenic or traumatic injury, we speculated that vaccination into the deltoid muscle had accidentally punctured the brachial artery, leading to the formation of a pulsative mass 10 days later. Although rare, this can happen, resulting in pseudoaneurysm. Fortunately, the surgery was timely; otherwise, sensory and motor dysfunction could have occurred while the median nerve was severely squeezed. The infant recovered well with no complications.

Herein, we have described a case of brachial artery pseudoaneurysm formation after vaccination in an infant, in whom resection of the pseudoaneurysm and vein graft interpositioning were successful. We emphasize that although vaccination can rarely lead to pseudoaneurysm, it is mostly safe. Efforts must be made to avoid such complications during vaccination.

Availability of data and materials

The materials used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Haemophilus influenzae Type b


Digital subtraction angiography




Peak systolic velocity


Computed tomography angiography


Magnetic resonance angiography


  1. Ministro A, Ferreira T, Batista L, Santana A, Alves N, Guerra J, et al. Mycotic Pseudoaneurysm After Kidney Transplantation: Two Case Reports. Transplant Proc. 2017;49(4):906–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson C, Holihan C, de Oliveira Sillero R, Lee K, Mitchell RB, Shah G. Infectious Pseudoaneurysm of the Internal Carotid Artery in a Child Secondary to Parapharyngeal Abscess. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;1–4.

  3. Maatman TK, Heimberger MA, Lewellen KA, Roch AM, Colgate CL, House MG, et al. Visceral artery pseudoaneurysm in necrotizing pancreatitis: incidence and outcomes. Can J Surg. 2020;63(3):E272-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yetkin U, Gurbuz A. Post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the brachial artery and its surgical treatment. Tex Heart Inst J. 2003;30(4):293–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ekim H, Tuncer M. Management of traumatic brachial artery injuries: a report on 49 patients. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29:105–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moro PL, Jankosky C, Menschik D, Lewis P, Duffy J, Stewart B, et al. Adverse events following Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1990–2013. J Pediatr. 2015;166(4):992–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones TR, Frusha JD, Stromeyer FW. Brachial artery aneurysm in an infant: case report and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg. 1988;7(3):439–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bueno A, Acín F, Rodríguez JM, March JR, de Benito L, Fernández-Casado JL. Ruptured popliteal aneurysm resulting from neurofibromatosis-a case report and review of the literature. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2005;39(5):449–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan Y, Lu N. Coronary artery aneurysm and facial drooping in a infant with Kawasaki disease. Cardiol Young. 2020;30(12):1957–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abon JCR, Lopez MPJ, Berberabe A, Cinco KJ. Pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm associated with polyarteritis nodosa presenting as massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(11):e247359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kermani TA, Diab S, Sreih AG, Cuthbertson D, Borchin R, Carette S, et al. Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium. Arterial lesions in giant cell arteritis: A longitudinal study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;48(4):707–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kemp K, Radwan R, Shingler G, Davies C. Brachial artery pseudoaneurysm BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2014203924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaczynski J, Wilczynska M, Fligelstone L. Flail upper limb due to delayed presentation of a traumatic brachial artery pseudoaneurysm. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2012007706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kapoor BS, Haddad HL, Saddekni S, Lockhart ME. Diagnosis and management of pseudoaneurysms: an update. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009;38(4):170–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McNeil NL, Clark TW. Sonographically guided percutaneous thrombin injection versus sonographically guided compression for femoral artery pseudoaneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):459–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kontopodis N, Tsetis D, Tavlas E, Dedes A, Ioannou CV. Ultrasound Guided Compression Versus Ultrasound Guided Thrombin Injection for the Treatment of Post-Catheterization Femoral Pseudoaneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51(6):815–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoo T, Starr JE, Go MR, Vaccaro PS, Satiani B, Haurani MJ. Ultrasound-Guided Thrombin Injection Is a Safe and Effective Treatment for Femoral Artery Pseudoaneurysm in the Morbidly Obese. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017;51(6):368–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leite T, Pires M, Pires L, Chagas C, Oliveira AC. Giant iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm of the brachial artery: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;37:193–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



HFS was in charge of the admission and follow-up of the patient, led the treatment, and participated in reviewing the manuscript; SY took part in the patient’s preoperative and postoperative ultrasound examination, provided Fig. 1(C–F) and Fig. 4; KJL and PY were responsible for the majority of the treatment, as well as collection and analysis of the original data; HY participated in the treatment of the patient and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hu Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parent for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, Hf., Yuan, S., Liang, Kj. et al. Pseudoaneurysm of the brachial artery in an infant due to vaccination: a case report. BMC Pediatr 23, 9 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Brachial artery
  • Complication
  • Infant
  • Pseudoaneurysm
  • Vaccination
  • Case report