Skip to main content

Rolling stones: an instructive case of neonatal cholestasis

Abstract

Background

Jaundice within the first 1–2 weeks of a neonate’s life will generally self-resolve; however, if it lasts longer than this time frame it warrants further work up. Direct or conjugated hyperbilirubinemia can suggest neonatal cholestasis, which in turn reflects marked reduction in bile secretion and flow. The differential diagnosis for neonatal cholestasis is broad. Neonatal choledocholithiasis is a rare cause of neonatal cholestasis, but should be considered on the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with elevated conjugated bilirubin.

Case presentation

We describe an infant who presented with neonatal cholestasis. He subsequently underwent work up for biliary atresia, as this is one of the more time-sensitive diagnoses that must be made in neonates with conjugated hyperbilirubinemia. He was ultimately found to have choledocholithiasis on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. He was managed conservatively with optimizing nutrition and ursodeoxycholic acid therapy.

Conclusions

We found that conservative management, specifically optimizing nutrition and treating with ursodeoxycholic acid, can be a sufficient approach to facilitating resolution of the choledocholithiasis and conjugated hyperbilirubinemia.

Peer Review reports

Background

Infants who remain jaundiced after 2 weeks of life must be evaluated quickly [1, 2]. Jaundice caused by indirect (or unconjugated) bilirubin in the newborn period is most commonly due to red blood cell breakdown (hemolysis), breastfeeding or breast milk [3]. Jaundice caused by direct (or conjugated) bilirubin is most commonly due to liver impairment, such as cholestasis. Cholestasis in the newborn can be due to immaturity or impairment of their hepatic excretory function, inborn errors causing dysfunction of the biliary system, as well as an increased susceptibility to viral and toxic insults. In term infants, the most common identifiable causes of neonatal cholestasis are biliary atresia (BA) and rare genetic disorders [2]. In premature infants, it is important to also consider total parenteral nutrition (TPN) use and sepsis [1]. It is important to rule out biliary atresia (BA) immediately as the prognosis is best when interventions are performed early [4]. Here we describe an instructive case of cholestasis caused by bile duct obstruction from gallstones. Management of infants with choledocholithiasis is not well studied, as it is a rare cause of cholestasis in this population. This case demonstrates the importance of considering choledocholithiasis on the differential for cholestasis in neonates.

Case presentation

Our patient is a former 39-week gestational age male who was referred to us by his pediatrician at 2 months of age for 1 week of jaundice and pale stools. He was growing well on formula feeds of Similac Sensitive 6 oz every 3 h until about 2–3 weeks prior to referral when he began to have recurring episodes of emesis. On initial presentation, his weight was appropriate at the 35th% tile (Supplemental Figure). His skin and sclerae were jaundiced, and he had a non-tender, non-distended abdomen. He had conjugated hyperbilirubinemia and elevated liver enzymes (Table 1). Other significant labs included protease inhibitor (PI) typing for alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency showing heterozygosity for the Z allele (PI*MZ genotype) (Table 2). Initial right upper quadrant ultrasound (US) showed a normal gallbladder, spleen, liver and intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts (no biliary dilation appreciated; common bile duct measured 1.5 mm). Due to the time sensitive nature of diagnosing BA, our patient underwent transhepatic percutaneous cholangiogram and liver biopsy on day 2 of his admission. Cholangiogram showed a dilated common bile duct (CBD) (diameter 6 mm), dilated cystic/intrahepatic bile ducts, and failure of dye flow into the intestines (Fig. 1A). The liver biopsy was consistent with obstruction, showing inflammatory cells, proliferation of bile ducts, and bile accumulation (Fig. 2) (analyzed using Olympus transmitted light microscopy BX60 model with Olympus DP71 camera and Olympus CellSense digital software for capturing images, without downstream processing of images). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of liver tissue did not detect parvovirus, adenovirus, human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV).

Table 1 Laboratory values during evaluation of neonatal cholestasis
Table 2 Other diagnostic laboratory values
Fig. 1
figure 1

A Transhepatic percutaneous cholangiogram obtained at the time of liver biopsy. Arrowhead indicates cystic duct dilation. Arrow indicates CBD dilation. Asterisk marks location of filling defect near the ampulla. B Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Arrow indicates extrahepatic bile duct dilation. Asterisks marks location of theoretical stone

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percutaneous liver biopsy features: A Portal regions with mild increase in chronic inflammatory cells with occasional eosinophils and increased number of bile ducts (arrows; scale bar = 100 micrometers; H&E stain, original magnification 400x); B Prominent canalicular cholestasis with bile accumulation (arrows; space bar = 40 micrometers; H&E stain, original magnification 1,000x); C Bile duct proliferation associated with portal regions highlighted on CK7 immunohistochemical staining (space bar = 100 micrometers; original magnification 400x); D Canalicular bile with typical ultrastructural morphology and no features of Byler’s bile (arrows, space bar = 2 micrometer; transmission electron microscopy, original magnification 15,000x)

Given the extensive ductal dilation and very distal obstruction near the ampulla seen on cholangiogram, we were less concerned about BA and did not proceed to operative exploration or Kasai portoenterostomy. To improve bile flow, the patient was started on ursodeoxycholic acid and the parents were encouraged to continue feedings with his home formula. He remained stable while we continued to monitor daily ALT, AST, GGT and bilirubin. Because his labs remained elevated on day 5, a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was performed to further evaluate the distal obstruction (Fig. 1B). This showed gallstones with upstream biliary dilation and CBD dilation (6 mm). With this new finding of gallstones, we consulted surgery. We ultimately opted for conservative management due to his small size and stable condition. His ursodeoxycholic acid therapy was continued (12 mg/kg twice daily), and we encouraged feeds every 3 hours to stimulate bile flow. We changed his formula to medium chain triglyceride formula to increase fat-soluble vitamin absorption.

On day 6 of admission his stools started to transition from pale to brown. US on day 9 showed a decrease in CBD dilation to 3 mm with no gallstones identified. His conjugated bilirubin continued to downtrend, he continued to demonstrate excellent weight gain on his new formula (Supplemental Figure), and he was ultimately discharged home on day 12 of his stay. Eight days after discharge he had a conjugated bilirubin of 0.0 mg/dL and a follow up US showed normal CBD diameter (1.5 mm).

Discussion and conclusion

Jaundice develops in 50% of term and 80% of preterm infants, but typically resolves spontaneously within 2–3 weeks [2]. Cholestatic jaundice is caused by a build-up of conjugated bilirubin due to a complete halt or marked reduction in bile secretion and flow [2]. The differential for cholestatic jaundice in a neonate is broad and includes BA, Alagille’s syndrome, alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency, progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, choledochal cysts, cystic fibrosis, metabolic diseases, infection, and sepsis [1].

While choledocholithiasis is common on the differential for cholestasis in adults, choledocholithiasis in a neonate is a rare finding. It is estimated that 0.15–0.22% of children younger than 16 years have cholelithiasis, and that only 10% of these children will have choledocholithiasis. In neonates choledocholithiasis is relatively uncommon, estimated at far less than 1 in 5000 in one study by Yu et al. [5] Neonates most commonly develop gallstones due to hemolysis, ileal disease, congenital anomalies of the biliary tree, hyperalimentation, prolonged fasting, TPN use and sepsis [6]. MZ heterozygosity may also confer an increased risk for gallstone disease for reasons that are not fully understood [7,8,9,10]. Some infants with alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency have poor bile flow so it is possible that heterozygotes also have impaired bile flow which could promote gallstone formation [7,8,9,10].

Medical management with ursodeoxycholic acid is recommended in neonates with choledocholithiasis if they are asymptomatic or with mild symptoms. Antibiotics can aid in the resolution of stones in neonates who have signs of infection [5, 11, 12]. In a study of 13 infants with gallstones, 10 remained asymptomatic without surgical management, and stones resolved on their own in 5 of them, with the other 5 either lost to follow-up or with persistent calcified gallstones [6]. In another study, 3 infants with choledocholithiasis treated with antibiotics and ursodeoxycholic acid had resolution of gallstones and CBD dilation [11]. It has been reported that choledocholithiasis resolves spontaneously in up to 35–60% of cases seen in neonates and infants [5].

Invasive management has also been used in management of choledocholithiasis in neonates. In a 3-week-old full-term infant with choledocholithiasis who was not improving with medical management, cholecystectomy and stone extraction was successfully performed [13, 14]. Another study describes a premature infant with choledocholithasis and compromised hepatic function who was successfully treated with cholecystectomy and t-tube placement [13, 14]. In a case report of a 4 month old, ERCP and sphincterotomy were chosen as the route of management because his liver labs were not normalizing [15].

While BA is an important differential diagnosis for cholestasis in infants, this case is a reminder that not all obstruction in neonates is BA. Clues arguing against BA in this case included bile duct dilation (though not seen on initial US) and obstruction only at the most distal biliary segment near the intestines. In BA, bile ducts are not dilated despite extrahepatic bile duct obstruction, perhaps because of inflammatory and/or fibrotic changes around the biliary system [16,17,18]. In addition, obstruction typically involves more segments of the biliary system, though a minority of cases have obstruction only affecting the CBD [16,17,18]. Our patient presented with conjugated hyperbilirubinemia and acholic stools and was found to have proliferating bile ducts, which are features of BA. While it is important to evaluate neonates for BA quickly, it is also useful to concurrently consider other causes such as choledocholithiasis which can often be managed with ursodeoxycholic acid therapy and adequate feeds.

In conclusion, this case demonstrates how choledocholithiasis can cause neonatal cholestasis and be treated non-surgically with conservative care. Clinicians should include choledocholithiasis in their differential when evaluating cholestatic infants for BA.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

BA:

Biliary atresia

TPN:

Total parenteral nutrition

US:

Ultrasound

PI:

Protease inhibitor

CBD:

Common bile duct

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

HHV-6:

human herpesvirus 6

EBV:

Epstein Barr virus

CMV:

Cytomegalovirus

References

  1. Balistreri WF. Neonatal cholestasis. J Pediatr. 1985;106(2):171–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fawaz R, Baumann U, Ekong U, Fischler B, Hadzic N, Mack CL, et al. Guideline for the evaluation of Cholestatic jaundice in infants: joint recommendations of the north American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(1):154–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Woodgate P, Jardine LA. Neonatal jaundice. BMJ Clin Evid. 2011;2011:0319.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gad EH, Kamel Y, Salem TA, Ali MA, Sallam AN. Short- and long-term outcomes after Kasai operation for type III biliary atresia: Twenty years of experience in a single tertiary Egyptian center-A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;62:302–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.052 Published 2021 Jan 23.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu PT, et al. Management of Choledocholithiasis in an infant. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2018;29:52–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. St-Vil D, Yazbeck S, Luks FI, Hancock BJ, Filiatrault D, Youssef S. Cholelithiasis in newborns and infants. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(10):1305–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Strnad P, McElvaney NG, Lomas DA. Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1443–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferkingstad E, Oddsson A, Gretarsdottir S, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis yields 20 loci associated with gallstone disease. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fromme M, Schneider CV, Pereira V, et al. Hepatobiliary phenotypes of adults with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Gut. 2022;71(2):415–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider CV, Hamesch K, Gross A, et al. European Alpha-1 liver study group. Liver phenotypes of European adults heterozygous or homozygous for piZ variant of AAT (piMZ vs piZZ genotype) and noncarriers. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(2):534–48 e11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nordin N, Alex G, Clarnette T, Stephens N, Oliver M. Common bile duct stones in infancy: a medical approach. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48(8):705–9 Epub 2012 Apr.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maruyama K, Koizumi T. Choledocholithiasis in an infant of extremely low birthweight. J Paediatr Child Health. 2002;38(2):204–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peters LE, Ladd AP, Markel TA. Obstructive Choledocholithiasis requiring intervention in a three week old neonate: a case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2016;4:13–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang JH, Kim KJ, Moon KR. Surgical treatment of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis in a 2-month-old premature and low birth weight infant. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005;21(5):403–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas M, Kadiwar K, Domajnko B, Santos MC. Choledocholithiasis in a 4-month-old infant. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(6):E19–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khalil BA, Perera MT, Mirza DF. Clinical practice: management of biliary atresia. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(4):395–402 Epub 2009 Dec 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartley J, Davenport M, Kelly DA. Biliary atresia. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1704–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Russo P, Magee JC, Anders RA, Bove KE, Chung C, Cummings OW, et al. Key Histopathologic features of liver biopsies that distinguish biliary atresia from other causes of infantile cholestasis and their correlation with outcome: a multicenter study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(12):1601–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

SH is supported by NIH K23DK109207 and R03DK128535. The funder(s) had no specific role for this particular study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PK reviewed the patient’s chart, performed an extensive literature search, drafted the initial case report, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. SS assisted with chart review, designing the figures and tables, drafting the initial case report, and reviewing and revising the case report. JH, MJH,and SH assisted with reviewing and revising the case report. All authors approved the final case report as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjiv Harpavat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The parents/guardians provided written and informed consent for their child’s personal or clinical details along with identifying images to be published in this study.

Competing interests

SH is on a Data Safety Monitoring Board coordinated by Syneos Health, for a therapeutic drug trial for biliary atresia.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Figure.

Weight-for-age trend over time

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Killelea, P., Sakhuja, S., Hernandez, J. et al. Rolling stones: an instructive case of neonatal cholestasis. BMC Pediatr 22, 526 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03560-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03560-3

Keywords