Skip to main content

Large scale application of pulse oximeter and auscultation in screening of neonatal congenital heart disease

Abstract

Purpose

To conduct a retrospective evaluation of a large clinical implementation of combined pulse oximeter (POX) and cardiac auscultation as a fast-screening device for congenital heart disease (CHD).

Methods

Every newborn in a large maternity healthcare center received auscultation and POX screening within 24 hours after delivery. When an abnormal heart murmur or SpO2 level was detected, an echocardiogram was ordered to confirm the diagnosis of CHD.

Results

From January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019, there were 44,147 livebirths at the studied hospital where 498 suspected CHD were identified: 27 newborns by POX screening and 471 by cardiac auscultation. The diagnosis was further confirmed in 458 neonates through echocardiogram. This result put forth an overall diagnosis rate of 92.0%. Cardiac auscultation detected the majority of CHD cases 438 (95.6%) while POX only screened 20 (4.4%) cases. Interestingly, no CHD case was detected by both auscultation examination and POX screening. Auscultation detected most of the common types of CHD, but POX excelled in identifying rare and critical cases. POX screening alone had a very low accuracy of 74.07% in positive predict value (PPV). On the other hand, auscultation functioned well in terms of PPV and negative predict value (NPV) (92.99 and 99.95%, respectively), but the addition of POX improved the overall screening performance resulting in 100% NPV. We also validate the finding with the data 6 months after the study period.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that addition of pulse oximetry to routine cardiac auscultation could be used as an accurate and feasible screening for early screening of CHD in newborns in large-scale clinical practice.

Peer Review reports

What is known

  • Pulse-oximetry is safe, acceptable, non-invasive and effective.

  • Pulse oximetry screening increases early diagnosis of major CHD as well as other important pathology with a very low false positive rate and minimal requirement for extra echocardiograms.

  • Pulse-oximetry plus cardiac auscultation significantly improved the detection rate of major CHD in the early neonatal stage, with high sensitivity and a reasonable false-positive rate.

What is new

  • Screening with pulse oximetry or auscultation alone within the first 24 hours of life may not detect all cases of CHD.

Introduction

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common type of congenital malformations, with an overall prevalence of 6-10‰ in newborns, with ~ 2-3‰ severe cases [1]. About a quarter of CHD patients require surgery or catheterization in neonatal period, or early infancy [2]. Timely diagnosis and treatment can greatly improve the prognosis of patients [3]. Conversely, delayed diagnosis often leads to serious hypoxia, shock, acidosis, pneumonia, and other complications including death. Studies have reported that delayed diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) led to death in 1-2 of every 100,000 live births in the United States [4]. Prenatal obstetric ultrasound can only detect ~ 30% fetuses with CHD [5], but early neonatal diagnosis is still a big challenge.

Although echocardiography is the golden standard in CHD diagnosis, it usually takes more than 10 minutes to perform, and it is not practical to perform echocardiography for every newborn in areas where resource is limited. As an alternative, pulse oximetry (POX) is easy to operate and requires only 2 to 3 minutes to analyze the results. Besides, POX as an adjunct to current routine practice is likely to be a cost-effective strategy in the light of currently accepted thresholds [6]. It is highly specific in detecting CCHD with moderate sensitivity, and had been widely employed [7]. Since Dr. Guoying Huang introduced and established CHD screening system via POX in 2018, it has been gradually adopted in clinical practice in China [8].

As a large maternal and child healthcare facility, the studied hospital delivers more than 20,000 babies annually. Providing quick, convenient, and accurate screening tools for CHD detection among newborns are crucial for the local community in the absence of echocardiologist. Since 2018, this health center implemented a new strategy of combined auscultation and POX in CHD screening among newborns. When suspected CHD babies are identified by POX or auscultation, an echocardiography was requested for confirmation. This study was the first performance report from large-scale implementation of combined auscultation and POX in CHD screenings.

Methods

Study design and participants

We conducted this retrospective study, from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019, at Linyi Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital. All consecutive newborns were eligible, irrespective of gestational age, NICU admission, symptom presence or prenatal diagnosis. This study was approved by institutional ethical review board of Linyi Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital. Verbal, informed consent was obtained from the participants’ parents. The registry number is NCT05105880, 03/11/2021 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov).

Procedures

All newborns would undergo POX and auscultation screening. Depending on the screening results, suspected-CHD neonates would then receive echocardiography confirmation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Screening process

Cardio-auscultation

Pediatricians from Departments of Neonatal Medicine and Developmental Medicine are responsible for auscultation screening. A standard pediatric stethoscope (Model 3200, 3 M Littmann) was used. Cardiac auscultation was performed on the five points of auscultation (pulmonic, aorta, Erb’s point, tricuspid, and mitral) for each newborn under typical conditions of the general maternity ward, and the duration lasted 60 seconds per neonate. When abnormal murmur occurred, an echocardiography was requested to confirm if the newborn has CHD or not.

Pulse oximetry

Physicians from obstetrics department and nursing staff from neonatal department examined POX measurements using a pulse oximeter (Masimo, Irvine, CA, USA), with a multisite reusable or disposable sensor (Model 2329, Masimo). All babies were screened within 24 hours after birth. Pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO2) was measured from the right hand and on either foot, and SpO2 levels were recorded on the nursing report sheet. If the measurement was less than 90% or the difference between two extremities was more than 3%, the baby was referred for echocardiography immediately. If one extremity’s measurement ranged between 90 and 94%, the clinician repeated the test on the baby 4 hours later. If measurements on both extremities were between 90 and 94%, the baby was referred for echocardiography.

Echocardiography

Physicians from Department of Ultrasonography confirmed the diagnosis of CHD among newborns screened by auscultation or POX through directing echocardiography. Pediatricians then referred the CHD results to cardiology center for an echocardiographic examination. After examination of cardiac position, atrioventricular morphology, valve morphology, and the connection between valves and large blood vessels, cardiac sonographer made the diagnosis of CHD according to the International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code [9]. On the basis of the CHD severity classification recommended by Hoffman’s method, CHD cases were further classified into severe, moderate and mild groups, and prescribed treatment plans accordingly [10].

Results

During 2-year study period, there were a total of 44,147 livebirths in the studied hospital. The demographic characteristics of the screened population were summarized in Table 1. The majority of the newborns were full term births delivered between 37 and 40 gestational weeks, with a median gestational age of 39 weeks. The median birth weight for newborn was 3420 g. All babies underwent screening within 24 hours after birth and cesarean section rate was 45.2%.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of newborns

There were 498 newborns identified with CHD initially – 27 by POX screening and 471 by cardiac auscultation – with an overall screening rate of 1.13% among all 44,147 livebirths. Of these cases, 458 neonates were confirmed by echocardiography, making the overall diagnostic rate of CHD via echocardiogram 92.0% (including 253 male babies and 245 female babies). The screen results were presented in Table 2. The most common types of CHD were PDA (34.3%), ASD (20.5%), VSD (8.3%), and combined complications (34.5%). Rare CHD included COA, CTA PAPVC, TAPVC, TGA, and TOF, accounting for a total of 2.2% cases. Mild CHD accounted for 74% of all cases, followed by moderate CHD (15.3%), and severe CHD (10.7%). We also conducted chart review of newly diagnosed CHD in 2022, and didn’t identify additional CHD case after cross-checking with the results of newborn screening.

Table 2 Result of CHD cases

Of the 458 confirmed CHD subjects, cardiac auscultation alone detected majority of 438 CHD cases (95.6%) and POX only screened 20 (4.4%) cases. However, no single incidence of CHD was recognized by both auscultation and POX screening (Table 3). A potential explanation for this result is that auscultation detected most of the common types of CHD neonates, but POX detected the rare, yet critical CHD types, including COA, CTA, PAPVC, TAPVC, TGA, and TOF. A similar finding was observed in a new set of data from 2020 (data not shown).

Table 3 Detection for CHD types

POX screening alone had a low accuracy of 74.07% in positive predict value (PPV). Auscultation alone functioned well in terms of PPV and negative predict value (NPV) (92.99 and 99.95%, respectively), but the addition of POX improved the overall screening performance to 100% NPV (Table 4).

Table 4 Screening accuracy for CHD newborns (n = 44,147)

As PDA and ASD were not included in prenatal screening by ultrasonography, they were excluded when tracing back prenatal ultrasound screening. Of the remaining 108 cases, 37 (34.3%) fetuses were diagnosed with CHD, including 35 cases of VSD, 1 case of COA, and 1 case of TOF (Table 5).

Table 5 Prenatal trace back of confirmed CHD cases excluding PDA and ASD cases (n = 108)

Discussion

This was the first retrospective report of large-scale clinical implementation of combined POX and cardiac auscultation in routine CHD screening for all newborn infants within 24 hours after delivery. Within a two-year period, we identified 458 CHD neonates from 44,147 live births, of which 74% neonates are diagnosed with mild CHD, 15.3% with moderate CHD, and 10.7% with major CHD. POX in conjunction with clinical auscultation resulted in a high detection rate of serious CHD.

The most intriguing finding in this clinical evaluation was that there was no overlap of CHD spectrums between POX detection and auscultation detection. In contrast to common CHDs detected by auscultation, POX-detected CHDs were rare and critical, including COA, CTA, PAPVC, TAPVC, TGA, and TOF, which were consistent with the primary and second target lesions presenting at least mild hypoxemia during the neonatal period [11]. This observation was different from two previous research with significant overlaps between two screening techniques [8, 12]. The dynamic changes of pulmonary arterial pressure in newborns in combination of all screenings conducted within the first 24 hours after delivery likely contributed to the difference between our findings and the previous observations. In fetal period, pulmonary circulation is not in use. Instead, it is occupied by amniotic fluid and full of pressure. After birth, because postnatal circulation requires inhalation of air, lung aeration initiates and clears the airway fluid, accompanied by decreasing pulmonary arterial pressure from 60 mmHg at birth to about 30 mmHg at 24 hours of age [13,14,15]. Since all of our screenings were conducted within the first 24 hours of delivery, which was different from the 72-hour window used in previous studies, it might be difficult to detect abnormal heart murmur when pulmonary arterial pressure still maintained relatively high levels. Moreover, in one of two previous studies with a large population of 167,190 asymptomatic newborn infants, most POX-recognizable CHD cases were only detected via auscultation [12]. Since this study was a multicenter research investigating the accuracy and feasibility of implementing cardiac auscultation and POX as a screening method in China, there might be large variations in the POX measurement among different hospitals studied for different researches, resulting in low detection rate by POX in other studies. Our findings manifested the complementary aspects of POX and auscultation in early screening of CHD among newborns, shedding light on the effectiveness of combined use of both methods in comprehensive neonatal screening, especially regions lacking echocardiologists.

Meanwhile, the commonality of certain types of CHD was different: PDA, VSD, and ASD accounting for 97.6% of total CHD cases in our study and ~ 91.1% in previous studies. The difference in incidence rate and the CHD spectrum could be explained by differences in prenatal management among different hospitals [8, 12]. Tertiary referral hospitals have more medical resources and better prenatal screening and management systems. Pregnant women registered at these hospitals often received additional prenatal ultrasound screening, which can increase the chance of prenatal diagnosis of major CHD, usually followed with termination of pregnancy. Contrasting to previous multicenter researches which collected data from a wide range of hospitals, our study was conducted at a single, tertiary referral hospital which had better prenatal management systems, prenatal screenings and adequately trained medical staffs [16].

Some mild congenital defects, including small muscular VSD, ASD and PDA, would become less noticeable or even close spontaneously without intervention [17]. Owing to the natural closure, these neonates should not be included when calculating CHD incidence, or if counted, it will increase the incidence rate at different stages. Moreover, due to limited resource, our study only considered observable CHD cases before discharge, whereas other studies offered follow up statistics among neonates after discharge. Thus, previously misdiagnosed or undiagnosed neonates would be determined to have CHD and added to the total CHD incidence later in the study. Furthermore, some studies would exclude CHD cases that were screened out in prenatal ultrasonography and confirmed in postnatal echocardiography, and symptomatic CHD neonates such as cyanotic subjects would not be included, either. As a whole, these limitations explain the observable differences in overall CHD occurrence and the major type of diagnosed CHD between our study and the previous studies.

Since this was a retrospective report of large-scale clinical implementation of combined POX and cardiac auscultation in routine CHD screening and we didn’t conduct follow-up investigation, it was possible some CHD infants were missed in screening. We therefore conducted a chart review of newly diagnosed CHD in 2022, and didn’t identify additional CHD case after cross-checking with the results of newborn screening. We presumed that the studied hospital was the major tertiary hospital for pediatric referrals, and CHD children missed in newborn screening could be identified from chart review. Although it was possible that missed CHD children could be referred to another hospital, the number of missed CHD cases should be small.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that within the first 24 hours after birth, when auscultation and POX combined in CHD screening, it can generate quick and accurate outcomes in an economic way, which can benefit facilities in low-income area and hospitals short of ward resource.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ASD:

Atrial septal defect

CCHD:

Critical congenital heart disease

CHD:

Congenital heart disease

COA:

Coarctation of the aorta

CTA:

Cor triatriatum

NPV:

Negative predict value

PAPVC:

Partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection

PDA:

Patent ductus arteriosus

POX:

Pulse oximeter

PPV:

Positive predict value

SpO2:

Oxygen saturation

TAPVC:

Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection

TGA:

Transposition of the great arteries

TOF:

Tetralogy of Fallot

VSD:

Ventricular septal defect

References

  1. Ministry of Health C: Report on birth defect prevention in China. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matherne GP, Smith FC, Hoke TR, Koppel R, et al. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2009;120(5):447–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mellander M, Sunnegårdh J. Failure to diagnose critical heart malformations in newborns before discharge--an increasing problem? Acta Paediatr. 2006;95(4):407–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oakley JL, Soni NB, Wilson D, Sen S. Effectiveness of pulse-oximetry in addition to routine neonatal examination in detection of congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(14):1736–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Donofrio MT, Moon-Grady AJ, Hornberger LK, Copel JA, Sklansky MS, Abuhamad A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(21):2183–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts TE, Barton PM, Auguste PE, Middleton LJ, Furmston AT, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry as a screening test for congenital heart defects in newborn infants: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(3):221–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thangaratinam S, Brown K, Zamora J, Khan KS, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9835):2459–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Q-m Z, Ma X-j, Ge X-l, Liu F, Yan W-l, Wu L, et al. Pulse oximetry with clinical assessment to screen for congenital heart disease in neonates in China: a prospective study. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):747–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Franklin RC, Jacobs JP, Krogmann ON, Beland MJ, Aiello VD, Colan SD, et al. Nomenclature for congenital and paediatric cardiac disease: historical perspectives and the International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code. Cardiol Young. 2008;18(Suppl 2):70–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(12):1890–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engel MS, Kochilas LK. Pulse oximetry screening: a review of diagnosing critical congenital heart disease in newborns. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016;9:199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu XJ, Ma XJ, Zhao QM, Yan WL, Ge XL, Jia B, et al. Pulse oximetry and auscultation for congenital heart disease detection. Pediatrics. 2017;140(4):e20171154. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1154. PMID: 28939700.

  13. Hu Q, Ren WD, Mao J, Li J, Qiao W, Bi WJ, et al. Changes in pulmonary artery pressure during early transitional circulation in healthy full-term newborns. Ultrasonics. 2015;56:524–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kang C, Zhao E, Zhou Y, Zhao H, Liu Y, Gao N, et al. Dynamic changes of pulmonary arterial pressure and ductus arteriosus in human newborns from birth to 72 hours of age. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(3):e2599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenough A, Khetriwal B. Pulmonary hypertension in the newborn. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2005;6(2):111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao QM, Niu C, Liu F, Wu L, Ma XJ, Huang GY. Accuracy of cardiac auscultation in detection of neonatal congenital heart disease by general paediatricians. Cardiol Young. 2019;29(5):679–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadowski SL. Congenital cardiac disease in the newborn infant: past, present, and future. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2009;21(1):37–48, vi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Zhaoxi Wang, Yinrui Zou, Qin Gao from Harvard International Healthcare Innovation Collaboration Initiatives for helpful discussions and for reviewing our manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the grant from Linyi Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YH designed the study and drafted the manuscript; SW, SZ, ZW conducted auscultation and collected data; XZ, LK undertook echocardiography; WW, SY, NT, GZ, AH, JX, HZ, AS, FQ undertook pulse oximeter tests. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiqiang Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by institutional ethical review board of Linyi Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital. Verbal, informed consent was obtained from the participants’ parents and was approved by the institutional ethical review board of Linyi Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospita. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The registry number is NCT05105880, 03/1/2021 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Zhong, S., Zhang, X. et al. Large scale application of pulse oximeter and auscultation in screening of neonatal congenital heart disease. BMC Pediatr 22, 483 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03540-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03540-7

Keywords

  • Congenital heart disease
  • Pulse oximetry
  • Auscultation
  • Screening
  • Critical congenital heart disease