Skip to main content
Download PDF

Laboured reading and musculoskeletal pain in school children - the role of lifestyle behaviour and eye wear: a cross-sectional study

BMC Pediatrics volume 22, Article number: 416 (2022) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 28 July 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Lifestyle behaviour in children and adolescents has become increasingly sedentary and occupied with digital work. Concurrently, there has been an increase in the prevalence of headache, neck- and low back pain, which are leading causes of disability globally. Extensive near work and use of digital devices are demanding for both the visual system and the upper body head-stabilizing musculature. Uncorrected vision problems are present in up to 40% of Nordic school children, and a lack of corrective eye wear may cause eyestrain, musculoskeletal pain and headache. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between laboured reading, musculoskeletal pain, uncorrected vision, and lifestyle behaviours in children and adolescents.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study with a total of 192 Norwegian school children aged 10–11 and 15–16 years. As a part of a school vision testing program, the children completed an online questionnaire about general and ocular health, socioeconomic status, academic ambition, near work and related symptoms, upper body musculoskeletal pain, and physical and outdoor activities.

Results

The 15–16-year-olds had a more indoor, sedentary, digital-based lifestyle with higher academic demands, compared with the 10–11-year-olds. Concurrently, reading became more laboured and upper body musculoskeletal pain increased with age. Girls reported more symptoms, higher academic ambitions, and more time spent on schoolwork and reading, compared with boys. Non-compliance in wearing prescribed eye wear (glasses or contact lenses), increased use of near digital devices, and experiencing visual stress (glare) were positively associated with laboured reading and upper body musculoskeletal pain.

Conclusions

A screen-based lifestyle with high academic demands challenges the ability to sustain long hours of static, intensive near work. Extensive near work tires the visual system and upper body musculature and provokes laboured reading and musculoskeletal pain symptoms. This study emphasizes the importance of regular eye examinations in school children, and the need to raise awareness among children, parents, and school- and health personnel about the importance of optimal vision and visual environment for academic performance and health.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Globally, children and adolescents have increasingly adopted a more sedentary lifestyle, and they have become more occupied with digital devices in pace with the digital revolution during the last 30–40 years [1]. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has, for many individuals, led to detriments in physical activity and a further increase in sedentary behaviour and use of near digital devices [2, 3]. Sedentary behaviour increases from childhood to adulthood [4]. Concurrently, the prevalence of headache, neck and low back pain increases, and these conditions are leading causes of sickness absence globally [5,6,7,8]. Further, in the age group 10–24 years both headache disorders and low back pain have increased during the last 30 years [8]. Near tasks, such as use of near digital devices, require high activity in extra- and intraocular muscles and precise coordination between the visual system and the head-stabilizing muscles. Therefore, uncorrected vision and lack of proper corrective eye wear, will induce eyestrain, upper body muscle tension, and unhealthy, static postures (such as forward bent head). This in turn may cause headache and neck, shoulder, and back pain [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Among Nordic school children, as many as 40% have uncorrected vision, lacking proper corrective eye wear for satisfactory and effortless vision during tasks at near (reading, writing, screen use) or far (reading a blackboard) [19,20,21,22]. Refractive errors, poor accommodation (reduced ability to focus at near), and binocular dysfunctions (poor coordination between the two eyes), have been associated with headache and upper body musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents [14, 17, 20, 22,23,24,25]. Furthermore, studies in children and adolescents indicate that physical inactivity, obesity, sleeping problems, prolonged near work and screen use, socioeconomic and psychosocial factors, and female sex, are risk factors involved in the development of spinal pain and headache [16, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Importantly, neck, shoulder and back pain and headache can lead to reduced daily functioning and academic performance, and impair recreational activities, thereby constituting a major health problem [41, 44,45,46,47]. Additionally, uncorrected vision and lack of proper corrective eye wear may impact the child’s ability to sustain near tasks over time, such as reading and writing, and thus reducing academic performance [22]. Optimal vision is essential for developing cognitive abilities associated with learning to read and write [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. Wearing glasses for one school year, when these are needed, compared to not wearing them, has been reported to advance the child’s knowledge equivalent of one semester’s learning [57, 58]. Cognition and academic performance have also been shown to increase with physical activity interventions and decrease with low motor performance and recurrent pain problems [59,60,61,62,63].

The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between symptoms of laboured reading, musculoskeletal pain, uncorrected vision, and lifestyle behaviours in children and adolescents. In this study ‘uncorrected vision’ was defined as common vision problems that can be fully corrected with eye wear (glasses or contact lenses), including refractive errors and accommodative and binocular dysfunctions.

Methods

Participants

This was a cross-sectional study in 10–11 and 15–16-year-old children (5th and 10th grade) at three schools in Kongsberg municipality, Norway, during the school year 2016–2017. Kongsberg municipality has a population of 1643 per sq. km, and is representative of the Norwegian population regarding public health and socio-demographic status [64, 65]. Sample size was calculated with a test power of 80%, a significance level of 5% (two-tailed) and standard errors based on previous musculoskeletal pain recordings [16]. Musculoskeletal pain was a main variable to investigate in the current study, and the power analysis showed that a total of 184 participants should suffice to identify a 40% difference in musculoskeletal pain between two independent groups. All 200 children attending 5th and 10th grade were invited to participate. There were no other inclusion or exclusion criteria. Written informed consent was obtained from 192 (96%) children and their parents after explanation of the nature and possible consequences of the study. All children in this study participated in the vision testing program offered to school children in 2nd, 5th and 10th grade in Kongsberg municipality, Norway. The vision testing program is organized by National Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care (NCOVE) at the University of South-Eastern Norway in collaboration with the municipality. The vision testing program consists of history taking and preliminary tests for assessing visual status, including visual acuity and cover test for distance and near, amplitude of accommodation, near point of convergence, motility, colour vision, and stereoacuity. Retinoscopy and autorefraction with and without cycloplegia and biometrical measures of the eye are also performed. Children with an uncorrected vision problem (according to international clinical guidelines [66, 67]) are referred for a full eye examination either at NCOVE or their private optometrist.

Of the 192 children included, 51 children attended 5th grade (10–11-year-olds, 53% girls), and 141 attended 10th grade (15–16-year-olds, 53% girls). In 5th grade, 5 (10%) of the children reported to use daily medication due to; asthma (2 children), vitamin D and iron deficiency (1 child), unknown (2 children). In 10th grade 27 (19%) of the children reported to use daily medication; allergy and asthma (9 children), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD) (6 children), vitamin and mineral supplements (6 children), oral contraceptives (4 children), acne vulgaris (4 children), hypothyroidism (1 child), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME) (1 child). In the whole sample, one (0.5%) child reported congenital cataract, two (1%) reported previous strabismus surgery, and 12 (6%) reported to have used eye patches due to amblyopia or strabismus.

Questionnaire

The children completed an online questionnaire on their school tablet (iPad, Apple Inc.) in class, during school hours (March 2017), and both a teacher and a member of the project group (HMST, RM, COB, LAH, TL, HRP, ES, GHV, RCB) were present to assist with technical difficulties or clarifying questions. The questionnaire was completed in approximately 15 min, and consisted of nominal, ordinal and ratio questions related to personalia (age, sex), socioeconomic status (number of books at home), academic ambition in 10th grade (preferred length of future education), daily medication, ocular health, use of glasses/contact lenses, symptoms and difficulties during tasks at near (reading, screen use) and far (blackboard), upper body musculoskeletal symptoms, and time spent on different activities on a typical weekday and day off in early March (winter in Norway); paper-based reading (books etc), screen use, outdoor activities, and physical activity. The list of activities was chosen to elicit information about near and far work, physical activity and indoor versus outdoor activities [68].

All questions regarding symptoms were given a score on a 5-point Likert scale: Never (1), Rarely (2), Sometimes (3), Often (4), Always (5). Total scores were computed by combining related ordinal questions: A total reading symptom score, here defined as ‘laboured reading’, was calculated combining the items ‘difficult to see text in book’, ‘tired eyes’ and ‘headache’ when reading, and ‘difficult to remember read text’ (4; max score 20). A total upper body musculoskeletal symptom score was calculated combining all musculoskeletal symptoms (pain in the neck, shoulders, low back, and arm/wrist/hand; 4; max score 20). Questions regarding time spent on different activities on a typical weekday and day off, were given a score on a 4-point scale: Never (1), Less than 1 hour (2), 1–2 hours (3), 3 hours or more (4). Scores on weekdays and days off were combined. Screen time score was calculated combining the items ‘computer use at home and school’, ‘relaxing with tablet’, ‘tablet use at school and when doing homework’, ‘mobile/Gameboy/Nintendo DS surfing and gaming’, and ‘reading books, blogs, newspapers etc. on mobile’ (5; max score 20). The sports score combined the items ‘sports indoor’ and ‘sports outdoor’ (2; max score 8). Total physical activity score was calculated combining the items ‘physical activity outdoor’ (such as walking, playing, hiking), ‘sports indoor’ and ‘sports outdoor’ (3; max score 12). Outdoor score was calculated combining the items ‘physical activity outdoor’ (such as walking, playing, hiking), ‘sports outdoor’, and ‘relaxing outdoor’ (such as spending time in the garden) (3, max score 12).

Statistics

Raw data were assessed for normality using Q-Q plots and the Shapiro-Wilk test. Differences in means between groups were tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to investigate associations between continuous variables. Chi-square independence tests were used to evaluate associations between categorical variables. A statistical difference was set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed). Statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 28, US).

Results

Symptoms

Table 1 presents symptom scores in 5th and 10th grade. Reading symptom score (F(1,190) = 6.149, p = 0.014) and upper body musculoskeletal symptom score (F(1,190) = 5.811, p = 0.017) were significantly higher in the older children, and they were significantly correlated (r = 0.471, n = 192, p < 0.001). Girls had significantly higher reading symptom score (F(1,190) = 6.747, p = 0.010) and upper body musculoskeletal symptom score (F(1,190) = 4.838, p = 0.029) compared with boys. In girls, shoulder pain increased significantly from 5th to 10th grade (2.4 ± 1.1 vs 1.7 ± 0.9 (mean ± SD); F(1,100) = 9.050, p = 0.003).

Table 1 Symptom and activity scores in 5th and 10th grade
Full size table

Girls were more bothered with tired eyes (F(1,190) = 22.488, p < 0.001) and reflections/glare (F(1,190) = 4.209, p = 0.042) during screen use (tablet). The older children also reported more reflections/glare (F(1,190) = 17.178, p < 0.001). Tired eyes and experiencing reflections/glare during screen use were significantly correlated (r = 0.350, n = 192, p < 0.001). Further, tired eyes during screen use were significantly correlated with more laboured reading (r = 0.547, n = 192, p < 0.001) and upper body musculoskeletal pain (r = 0.314, n = 192, p < 0.001). Also, children experiencing reflections/glare during screen use often/always (n = 60), reported significantly more laboured reading (reading symptom score; F(1,190) = 12.967, p < 0.001) and upper body musculoskeletal pain (symptom score; F(1,190) = 9.445, p = 0.002), compared with the rest of the sample.

Vision

The children had previously participated in the vision testing program offered at school (see Methods/Participants). Table 2 describes eye wear use frequencies. The 17 children who did not use their recommended glasses/contact lenses, reported significantly more laboured reading (F(1,190) = 21.457, p < 0.001) and upper body musculoskeletal pain (F(1,190) = 4.937, p = 0.027) compared with the rest of the sample (Figure 1). In line with this, these children often/always had shoulder pain (χ2(1, n = 192) = 10.45, p = 0.001), arm/wrist/hand pain (χ2(1, n = 192) = 12.68, p < 0.001), tired eyes (χ2(1, n = 192) = 8.63, p = 0.003) and headache (χ2(1, n = 192) = 17.08, p < 0.001) during reading, and tired eyes during screen use (χ2(1, n = 192) = 5.64, p = 0.018), at a significantly higher frequency compared with the rest of the sample. These 17 children also reported significantly more difficulties with distance vision (seeing text on blackboard) (2.7 ± 1.4 vs 1.8 ± 1.0 (mean ± SD); F(1,190) = 11.869, p = 0.001). Refractive error and mode of correction were known for 15 of these 17 participants. All had previously been prescribed eyeglasses; 13 were hyperopes (SER ≥ + 0.50 D) of whom two had astigmatism (≥ 0.75 DC) and one had anisometropia (difference between the eyes ≥ 1.00 D). Two were myopes (SER ≤ - 0.50 D) of whom one also had astigmatism. Five of the 17 children who did not wear the recommended eye wear, reported to take daily medication (allergy and asthma (4 children), ADD/ADHD (1 child), prescription vitamin supplements (1 child), and one child reported to have used eye patch due to amblyopia or strabismus. There were no significant differences in socioeconomic status, academic ambition, and time spent on different activities (including schoolwork (on school tablet) and reading on paper) between these 17 children and the rest of the sample.

Table 2 Eye wear use in 5th and 10th grade
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Symptom scores in children with normal vision / adequate prescribed eye wear (n = 175) and in children with non-compliance in wearing prescribed eye wear (n = 17). Data are presented as mean ± SD. *Statistically significant difference between the groups at p < 0.05

Full size image

Lifestyle behaviour

Table 1 shows scores on time spent on near work, physical activity, and outdoor activities. Children in 10th grade spent more time using digital devices (F(1,190) = 31.772, p < 0.001), doing schoolwork (on school tablet) (F(1,190) = 26.835, p < 0.001), and were less outdoor (F(1,190) = 10.219, p = 0.002), compared with children in 5th grade. Further, children in 10th grade read less on paper (F(1,190) = 5.650, p = 0.018), compared with the 5th grade children. There were significantly fewer children in 10th grade who walked or cycled to school (χ2(1, n = 192) = 9.49, p = 0.002) and were physically active during school breaks (χ2(1, n = 192) = 132.49, p < 0.001), compared with children in 5th grade. In the total sample there were no significant correlations between time spent using digital devices and time spent on sports, physical activity, and outdoor activities. Girls had higher academic ambitions (F(1,139) = 11.255, p = 0.001), did more schoolwork (on school tablet) (F(1,190) = 5.846, p = 0.017) and read more on paper (F(1,190) = 6.662, p = 0.011), compared with boys. There were no significant differences between girls and boys regarding total time spent using digital devices, on sports and physical activity, or being outdoors.

Children with neck pain sometimes/often/always (n = 78) spent more time doing schoolwork on tablet (F(1,190) = 5.123, p = 0.025) and reading on mobile (F(1,190) = 6.022, p = 0.015) compared with the rest of the sample. Children with shoulder pain sometimes/often/always (n = 55) had significantly increased mobile use compared with the rest of the sample (F(1,190) = 4.694, p = 0.032). Children with low back pain often/always (n = 16), had increased total screen time (F(1,190) = 5.755, p = 0.017) and mobile use (F(1,190) = 6.622, p = 0.011). Further, children who reported headache during reading often/always (n = 12), spent significantly more time using digital devices (F(1,190) = 8.220, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in socioeconomic status and total time spent on sports, physical activity, and outdoor activities, between children experiencing symptoms often/always or sometimes/often/always and the rest of the sample.

Discussion

This study showed that laboured reading and upper body musculoskeletal pain were associated with non-compliance in wearing prescribed eye wear, increased use of near digital devices, and visual stress (glare).

The 15–16-year-old adolescents spent more time on digital devices and schoolwork, read less on paper, were less outdoor, and were less physically active during the school day (walking/cycling to school, physical activity during school breaks) compared with the 10–11-year-olds. This shift in behaviour from childhood to adolescence to a more indoor, sedentary, and screen-based lifestyle with higher academic demands, is in accordance with earlier studies [1, 4]. Concurrently, the frequency of reported laboured reading, eye symptoms during use of digital devices, and upper body musculoskeletal pain were increased, and scores were higher in girls. Increase in pain symptoms from childhood to early adulthood has been reported in several studies [5,6,7,8], in addition to higher prevalence of spinal pain and headache in girls [6, 7, 38, 69]. In this study, non-compliance with the use of corrective eye wear and more visual stress (reflections/glare) during screen use were significantly associated with laboured reading and upper body musculoskeletal pain. Children not wearing the prescribed corrective eye wear, often/always experienced eyestrain and headache during reading and use of digital devices, together with pain in shoulders and arm/wrist/hand. In line with this, studies have reported significant correlations between uncorrected vision and impaired academic performance in children and adolescents [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. A study in 944 school-aged children showed an association between early literacy and visual acuity; children who adhered to spectacle wear improved their visual acuity and had the potential to improve literacy [55]. In a study with 1298 school children aged 8 years, hyperopia (far-sightedness) was associated with decreased reading and writing skills [49]. Uncorrected vision problems in children and adolescents have also been linked to increased frequency of both headache and neck, shoulder, and back pain [14, 17, 22, 23]. In a recent study, 10–15-year-old children presenting with headache and neck-, shoulder-, and back pain, had significantly more uncorrected vision problems and lacked necessary corrective eye wear for near, compared with a control group [17]. A study examining 10–13-year-old healthy children with corrected vision, showed that the children with the best visual acuity had less shoulder pain during screen use compared to those with poorer visual acuity [16]. Further, in accordance with this study, glare during screen work have been shown to affect neck- and shoulder musculature [70,71,72], and symptoms of photophobia/glare may be related to impaired binocular vision [73].

Girls reported more laboured reading and pain symptoms, higher academic ambitions, more time used on schoolwork and reading, in line with previous studies [74,75,76,77]. Girls were more likely to use eye wear for near work, compared with boys. Near work glasses are typically prescribed when a child has problems with sustained near work due to hyperopia and accommodative and binocular dysfunctions. A correct pair of near work glasses improve reading, writing and screen viewing and may prevent or relieve eye symptoms, headache and neck-, shoulder-, and back pain [78, 79]. Most Nordic school children are hyperopic, with no reported sex differences [19,20,21, 68, 78, 80]. The girls in this study were more occupied with intense and high-focused near work (schoolwork and reading), compared with boys, and this may have influenced the higher use of near work glasses among the girls. Further, uncorrected vision problems in combination with increased academic demands, may explain the increased prevalence of laboured reading and upper body musculoskeletal pain in the children who did not wear their recommended glasses/contact lenses (12 girls (11 in 10th grade), 5 boys (4 in 10th grade)) [77]. Increased frequency of pain symptoms in girls compared with boys, has previously been linked to differences in physiology and hormone profiles, and psychosocial factors [35, 81,82,83].

In the present study, headache and neck-, shoulder- and low back pain were also associated with increased use of near digital devices. Several studies in children and adolescents have showed correlations between duration of screen time and spinal pain [16, 34, 39, 84,85,86]. A study including 45 555 Danish children (2010–2014) showed more pronounced associations between spinal pain and screen time, compared to between spinal pain and physical inactivity [34]. There are few studies investigating pain symptoms in relation to the specific use of different types of digital devices in children and adolescents. However, children have been shown to hold their mobile close and only supported by their hands [16, 87, 88], and one study showed an inverse correlation between mobile viewing distance and neck pain [16]. Shorter viewing distances increase the load on the visual system and binocular vision, increasing the risk of eyestrain, headache and upper body musculoskeletal pain [25, 87, 89, 90].

In summary, this study supported the notion that near tasks, such as use of digital devices, are demanding for ocular muscles and the precise coordination between the visual system and the head-stabilizing muscles. Eye, musculoskeletal and headache symptoms may be aggravated with increased screen time, uncorrected vision problems and visual stress, such as glare [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18, 70,71,72].

Strengths and limitations

A strength of this study was that although the data were from a relatively small sample, the study population of 192 Norwegian children and adolescents was representative for 5th and 10th grade school children in Norway [64, 65], strengthening the potential generalizability of the study results to healthy Norwegians of the same age. Digital devices (tablet) were already implemented in teaching in Kongsberg municipality at the time of the data collection (2017). In 2022 the use of digital devices in Norwegian schools has further escalated, and many children use a tablet or a computer as their main tool for school- and homework. Combined with even easier access to private digital devices and increased use during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study probably underestimates screen time and the frequency of symptoms [91]. Study limitations included self-reported symptoms and time spent on different activities, which could bias the results. Also, we did not record systemic diseases, learning disabilities (e.g. dyslexia), developmental delays, or psychosocial variables, such as stress and quality of life, known to be associated with the experience of symptoms and pain in children and adolescents. Children with reading disabilities were likely to be equally present among the children with normal vision / adequate prescribed eye wear and children with non-compliance in wearing prescribed eye wear. Because of the cross-sectional design, the study was restricted to investigate contemporary associations in the data, and no conclusive statements regarding causal directions of the associations have been made. More research is required to understand the associations between types of refractive error, non-compliance, and development of symptoms.

Conclusions

In this study, 15–16-year-olds reported to have a more indoor, sedentary, digital-based lifestyle with higher academic demands than 10–11-year-olds. Concurrently, experiences of laboured reading and upper body musculoskeletal pain increased with age, and girls were more affected than boys. Non-compliance in wearing prescribed eye wear, visual stress (glare), and increased use of digital devices aggravated these symptoms. Uncorrected vision problems challenge the ability to sustain long hours of static, intensive near work, and may provoke pain symptoms. This emphasizes the need for regular eye examinations in children and adolescents to ensure proper corrective eye wear if needed.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analysed during the current study is available in the usn.figshare.com repository, https://doi.org/10.23642/usn.19045460

Change history

References

  1. WHO. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sadarangani KP, De Roia GF, Lobo P, Chavez R, Meyer J, Cristi-Montero C, et al. Changes in Sitting Time, Screen Exposure and Physical Activity during COVID-19 Lockdown in South American Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Karageorghis CI, Bird JM, Hutchinson JC, Hamer M, Delevoye-Turrell YN, Guerin SMR, et al. Physical activity and mental well-being under COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-sectional multination study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ortega FB, Konstabel K, Pasquali E, Ruiz JR, Hurtig-Wennlof A, Maestu J, et al. Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60871.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gustafsson ML, Laaksonen C, Aromaa M, Loyttyniemi E, Salantera S. The prevalence of neck-shoulder pain, back pain and psychological symptoms in association with daytime sleepiness - a prospective follow-up study of school children aged 10 to 15. Scand J Pain. 2018;18(3):389–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Joergensen AC, Hestbaek L, Andersen PK, Nybo Andersen AM. Epidemiology of spinal pain in children: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178(5):695–706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222.

  9. Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattak A, Mitra S, Yee RW. Computer vision syndrome: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50(3):253–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(5):502–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Vries J, Ischebeck BK, Voogt LP, Janssen M, Frens MA, Kleinrensink GJ, et al. Cervico-ocular Reflex Is Increased in People With Nonspecific Neck Pain. Phys Ther. 2016;96(8):1190–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnston JL, Daye PM, Thomson GT. Inaccurate Saccades and Enhanced Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Suppression during Combined Eye-Head Movements in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: Possible Implications for Cervical Vertigo. Front Neurol. 2017;8:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanchez-Gonzalez MC, Gutierrez-Sanchez E, Sanchez-Gonzalez JM, Rebollo-Salas M, Ruiz-Molinero C, Jimenez-Rejano JJ, et al. Visual system disorders and musculoskeletal neck complaints: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1457(1):26–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dotan G, Stolovitch C, Moisseiev E, Cohen S, Kesler A. Uncorrected amteropia among children hospitalized for headache evaluation: a clinical descriptive study. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lajmi H, Choura R, Ben Achour B, Doukh M, Amin Z, Hmaied W. Headache associated with refractive errors: Characteristics and risk factors. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2021.

  16. Falkenberg HK, Johansen TR, Schiøtz Thorud HM. Headache, eyestrain, and musculoskeletal symptoms in relation to smartphone and tablet use in healthy adolescents Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual. Science. 2020;13(2).

  17. Thorud HS, Aurjord R, Falkenberg HK. Headache and musculoskeletal pain in school children are associated with uncorrected vision problems and need for glasses: a case-control study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2093.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahmoud NF, Hassan KA, Abdelmajeed SF, Moustafa IM, Silva AG. The Relationship Between Forward Head Posture and Neck Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(4):562–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Vikesdal GH, Mon-Williams M, Langaas T. Optometric Disorders in Children and Adults with Dyslexia. Scand J Educ Res. 2020;64(4):601-611.

  20. Falkenberg HK, Langaas T, Svarverud E. Vision status of children aged 7-15 years referred from school vision screening in Norway during 2003-2013: a retrospective study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hopkins S, Narayanasamy S, Vincent SJ, Sampson GP, Wood JM. Do reduced visual acuity and refractive error affect classroom performance? Clin Exp Optom. 2019;103(3):278-289.

  22. Hagen LA, Gilson SJ, Baraas RC. Vision status and reading test results in adolescents in Norway. Scand J Optomet Visual Sci. 2020;13(2):2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akinci A, Guven A, Degerliyurt A, Kibar E, Mutlu M, Citirik M. The correlation between headache and refractive errors. J AAPOS. 2008;12(3):290–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hendricks TJ, J DEB, van Der Horst FG, Hendrikse F, Knottnerus JA. Relationship between habitual refractive errors and headache complaints in schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(2):137–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanchez-Gonzalez MC, Gutierrez-Sanchez E, Sanchez-Gonzalez JM, Rebollo-Salas M, Ruiz-Molinero C, Jimenez-Rejano JJ, et al. Visual system disorders and musculoskeletal neck complaints: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1457(1):26–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gustafsson ML, Laaksonen C, Aromaa M, Loyttyniemi E, Salantera S. The prevalence of neck-shoulder pain, back pain and psychological symptoms in association with daytime sleepiness - a prospective follow-up study of school children aged 10 to 15. Scand J Pain. 2018;18(3):389–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Joergensen AC, Hestbaek L, Andersen PK, Nybo Andersen AM. Epidemiology of spinal pain in children: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178(5):695–706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Connelly M, Sekhon S. Current perspectives on the development and treatment of chronic daily headache in children and adolescents. Pain Manag. 2019;9(2):175–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ben Ayed H, Yaich S, Trigui M, Ben Hmida M, Ben Jemaa M, Ammar A, et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Neck, Shoulders and Low-Back Pain in Secondary-School Children. J Res Health Sci. 2019;19(1):e00440.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Batley S, Aartun E, Boyle E, Hartvigsen J, Stern PJ, Hestbaek L. The association between psychological and social factors and spinal pain in adolescents. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178(3):275–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonthius DJ, Hershey AD. Headache in children: Approach to evaluation and general management strategies 2020 [Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/headache-in-children-approach-to-evaluation-and-general-management-strategies. Accessed June 22 2022.

  32. Sa S, Silva AG. Repositioning error, pressure pain threshold, catastrophizing and anxiety in adolescents with chronic idiopathic neck pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;30:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Szita J, Boja S, Szilagyi A, Somhegyi A, Varga PP, Lazary A. Risk factors of non-specific spinal pain in childhood. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(5):1119–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Joergensen AC, Strandberg-Larsen K, Andersen PK, Hestbaek L, Andersen AN. Spinal pain in pre-adolescence and the relation with screen time and physical activity behavior. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):393.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wijga AH, Gehring U, van de Putte EM, Koppelman GH, Vader S, Schmits RJH, et al. Headache in girls and boys growing up from age 11 to 20 years: the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy birth cohort study. Pain. 2021;162(5):1449–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Klavina-Makrecka S, Gobina I, Pulmanis T, Pudule I, Villerusa A. Insufficient sleep duration in association with self-reported pain and corresponding medicine use among adolescents: a cross-sectional population-based study in Latvia. Int J Public Health. 2020;65(8):1365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Robberstad L, Dyb G, Hagen K, Stovner LJ, Holmen TL, Zwart JA. An unfavorable lifestyle and recurrent headaches among adolescents: the HUNT study. Neurology. 2010;75(8):712–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Torres-Ferrus M, Vila-Sala C, Quintana M, Ajanovic S, Gallardo VJ, Gomez JB, et al. Headache, comorbidities and lifestyle in an adolescent population (The TEENs Study). Cephalalgia. 2019;39(1):91–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Costigan SA, Barnett L, Plotnikoff RC, Lubans DR. The health indicators associated with screen-based sedentary behavior among adolescent girls: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4):382–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Eitivipart AC, Viriyarojanakul S, Redhead L. Musculoskeletal disorder and pain associated with smartphone use: A systematic review of biomechanical evidence. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2018;38(2):77–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hakala PT, Saarni LA, Punamaki RL, Wallenius MA, Nygard CH, Rimpela AH. Musculoskeletal symptoms and computer use among Finnish adolescents--pain intensity and inconvenience to everyday life: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wirth B, Potthoff T, Rosser S, Humphreys BK, de Bruin ED. Physical risk factors for adolescent neck and mid back pain: a systematic review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2018;26:36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Xie Y, Szeto G, Dai J. Prevalence and risk factors associated with musculoskeletal complaints among users of mobile handheld devices: A systematic review. Appl Ergon. 2017;59(Pt A):132–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fuh JL, Wang SJ, Lu SR, Liao YC, Chen SP, Yang CY. Headache disability among adolescents: a student population-based study. Headache. 2010;50(2):210–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kernick D, Reinhold D, Campbell JL. Impact of headache on young people in a school population. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(566):678–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Philipp J, Zeiler M, Wober C, Wagner G, Karwautz AFK, Steiner TJ, et al. Prevalence and burden of headache in children and adolescents in Austria - a nationwide study in a representative sample of pupils aged 10-18 years. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Krogh AB, Larsson B, Linde M. Prevalence and disability of headache among Norwegian adolescents: A cross-sectional school-based study. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(13):1181–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Atkinson J, Anker S, Nardini M, Braddick O, Hughes C, Rae S, et al. Infant vision screening predicts failures on motor and cognitive tests up to school age. Strabismus. 2002;10(3):187–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Williams WR, Latif AH, Hannington L, Watkins DR. Hyperopia and educational attainment in a primary school cohort. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(2):150–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Roch-Levecq AC, Brody BL, Thomas RG, Brown SI. Ametropia, preschoolers' cognitive abilities, and effects of spectacle correction. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(2):252-258.

  51. Narayanasamy S, Vincent SJ, Sampson GP, Wood JM. Simulated astigmatism impairs academic-related performance in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35(1):8–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ma X, Zhou Z, Yi H, Pang X, Shi Y, Chen Q, et al. Effect of providing free glasses on children's educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2014;349:g5740.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Waterman AH, Havelka J, Culmer PR, Hill LJ, Mon-Williams M. The ontogeny of visual-motor memory and its importance in handwriting and reading: a developing construct. Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282(1798):20140896.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Harvey EM, Miller JM, Twelker JD, Davis AL. Reading Fluency in School-Aged Children with Bilateral Astigmatism. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(2):118–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Bruce A, Kelly B, Chambers B, Barrett BT, Bloj M, Bradbury J, et al. The effect of adherence to spectacle wear on early developing literacy: a longitudinal study based in a large multiethnic city, Bradford, UK. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e021277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Hopkins S, Narayanasamy S, Vincent SJ, Sampson GP, Wood JM. Do reduced visual acuity and refractive error affect classroom performance? Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103(3):278–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Neitzel AJ, Wolf B, Guo X, Shakarchi AF, Madden NA, Repka MX, et al. Effect of a Randomized Interventional School-Based Vision Program on Academic Performance of Students in Grades 3 to 7: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021.

  58. Ma Y, Congdon N, Shi Y, Hogg R, Medina A, Boswell M, et al. Effect of a Local Vision Care Center on Eyeglasses Use and School Performance in Rural China: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(7):731–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM, Carson V, Chaput JP, Janssen I, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S197–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Guirado T, Chambonniere C, Chaput JP, Metz L, Thivel D, Duclos M. Effects of Classroom Active Desks on Children and Adolescents' Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Academic Achievements and Overall Health: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6).

  61. Ragnarsson S, Myleus A, Hurtig AK, Sjoberg G, Rosvall PA, Petersen S. Recurrent Pain and Academic Achievement in School-Aged Children: A Systematic Review. J Sch Nurs. 2020;36(1):61–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ferreira Vorkapic C, Alves H, Araujo L, Joaquim Borba-Pinheiro C, Coelho R, Fonseca E, et al. Does Physical Activity Improve Cognition and Academic Performance in Children? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Neuropsychobiology. 2021;1-29.

  63. Haapala EA, Lintu N, Eloranta AM, Venalainen T, Poikkeus AM, Ahonen T, et al. Mediating effects of motor performance, cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour on the associations of adiposity and other cardiometabolic risk factors with academic achievement in children. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(20):2296–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Folkehelseprofil 2020 Kongsberg 2020 [Available from: https://www.fhi.no/hn/folkehelse/.

  65. Statistics Norway. Population and land area in urban settlements 2020 [Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/folketall/statistikk/tettsteders-befolkning-og-areal?fane=om.

  66. College of Optometrists. The routine eye examination 2022 [Available from: https://guidance.college-optometrists.org/guidance-contents/knowledge-skills-and-performance-domain/the-routine-eye-examination/.

  67. American Optometric Association. Comprehensive Pediatric Eye and Vision Examination 2017 [Available from: https://www.aoa.org/optometrists/tools-and-resources/clinical-care-publications/clinical-practice-guidelines?sso=y.

  68. Hagen LA, Gjelle JVB, Arnegard S, Pedersen HR, Gilson SJ, Baraas RC. Prevalence and Possible Factors of Myopia in Norwegian Adolescents. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13479.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Pourbordbari N, Riis A, Jensen MB, Olesen JL, Rathleff MS. Poor prognosis of child and adolescent musculoskeletal pain: a systematic literature review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e024921.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Mork R, Falkenberg HK, Fostervold KI, Thorud HS. Discomfort glare and psychological stress during computer work: subjective responses and associations between neck pain and trapezius muscle blood flow. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020;93(1):29-42.

  71. Mork R, Falkenberg HK, Fostervold KI, Thorud HMS. Visual and psychological stress during computer work in healthy, young females-physiological responses. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018;91(7):811–830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Mork R, Bruenech JR, Thorud HM. Effect of Direct Glare on Orbicularis Oculi and Trapezius During Computer Reading. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(7):738-749.

  73. Chung SA, Rhiu S, Han SH, Lee JB. Photophobia measurement in intermittent exotropia using the contrast sensitivity test. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(5):1405–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sikora J, Saha LJ. Gender and professional career plans of high school students in comparative perspective. Educ Res Eval. 2009;15(4).

  75. Wicht A, Miyamoto A, Lechner CM. Are Girls More Ambitious Than Boys? Vocational Interests Partly Explain Gender Differences in Occupational Aspirations. J Career Dev. 2021;49(3)551-568.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Cosma A, Stevens G, Vollebergh WAM, De Looze M. Time trends in schoolwork pressure among Dutch adolescents, 2001-2017: Gender and educational differences. Scand J Public Health. 2021;14034948211018388.

  77. Aanesen F, Meland E, Torp S. Gender differences in subjective health complaints in adolescence: The roles of self-esteem, stress from schoolwork and body dissatisfaction. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45(4):389–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Castagno VD, Fassa AG, Carret ML, Vilela MA, Meucci RD. Hyperopia: a meta-analysis of prevalence and a review of associated factors among school-aged children. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(5):502–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Demir P, Baskaran K, Theagarayan B, Gierow P, Sankaridurg P, Macedo AF. Refractive error, axial length, environmental and hereditary factors associated with myopia in Swedish children. Clin Exp Optom. 2021;1-7.

  81. Alashqar A, Shuaibi S, Ahmed SF, AlThufairi H, Owayed S, AlHamdan F, et al. Impact of Puberty in Girls on Prevalence of Primary Headache Disorder Among Female Schoolchildren in Kuwait. Front Neurol. 2020;11:594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Greenspan JD, Craft RM, LeResche L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Berkley KJ, Fillingim RB, et al. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. Pain. 2007;132(Suppl 1):S26–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Gustafsson ML, Laaksonen C, Salantera S, Loyttyniemi E, Aromaa M. Associations Between Daytime Sleepiness, Psychological Symptoms, Headache, and Abdominal Pain in Schoolchildren. J Sch Nurs. 2019;35(4):279–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Myrtveit SM, Sivertsen B, Skogen JC, Frostholm L, Stormark KM, Hysing M. Adolescent neck and shoulder pain--the association with depression, physical activity, screen-based activities, and use of health care services. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55(3):366–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Szita J, Boja S, Szilagyi A, Somhegyi A, Varga PP, Lazary A. Risk factors of non-specific spinal pain in childhood. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(5):1119–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Torsheim T, Eriksson L, Schnohr CW, Hansen F, Bjarnason T, Valimaa R. Screen-based activities and physical complaints among adolescents from the Nordic countries. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Ichhpujani P, Singh RB, Foulsham W, Thakur S, Lamba AS. Visual implications of digital device usage in school children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Salmeron-Campillo RM, Jaskulski M, Lara-Canovas S, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Lopez-Gil N. Novel Method of Remotely Monitoring the Face-Device Distance and Face Illuminance Using Mobile Devices: A Pilot Study. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:1946073.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Jaiswal S, Asper L, Long J, Lee A, Harrison K, Golebiowski B. Ocular and visual discomfort associated with smartphones, tablets and computers: what we do and do not know. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(5):463–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Long J, Cheung R, Duong S, Paynter R, Asper L. Viewing distance and eyestrain symptoms with prolonged viewing of smartphones. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100(2):133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Norwegian Media Authority. Barn og medier 2020. 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

A special thanks to staff, children and adolescents at participating schools in Kongsberg municipality, Norway.

Funding

This study was financed by Department of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, Department of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway

    Hanne-Mari Schiøtz Thorud

Authors
  1. Hanne-Mari Schiøtz Thorud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Randi Mork
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cecilie Onshuus Bjørset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stuart J. Gilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lene A. Hagen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Trine Langaas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hilde R. Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ellen Svarverud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gro Horgen Vikesdal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rigmor C. Baraas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Project administration and funding acquisition, RCB; conceptualization and methodology, HMST, RM, COB, SJG, LAH, TL, HRP, ES, GHV, RCB; software, SJG; data collection and curation, HMST, RM, COB, SJG, LAH, TL, HRP, ES, GHV, RCB; data analysis and writing original draft, HMST; writing - review and editing, HMST, RM, COB, SJG, LAH, TL, HRP, ES, GHV, RCB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanne-Mari Schiøtz Thorud.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC) in South East Norway (2014/1778). Written informed consent was obtained from all children and parents.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: In the originally published version of this article the word ‘undefined’ was incorrectly included in the second column in Table 2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorud, HM.S., Mork, R., Bjørset, C.O. et al. Laboured reading and musculoskeletal pain in school children - the role of lifestyle behaviour and eye wear: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr 22, 416 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03465-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03465-1

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us