Skip to main content

Neurocognitive deficits in survivors of childhood acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract

Background

Although treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) contains neurotoxic agents, studies investigating neurocognitive outcomes in children with AML are sparse. We evaluated late cognitive effects in children treated with a high-dose cytarabine based regimen, focusing on general intellectual ability and specific neurocognitive domains.

Methods

We evaluated 12 survivors of childhood AML who were treated between 2006 and 2016 and completed the Wechsler Intelligence Scales. One-sample t-tests were used to compare full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) and primary index scores to norms. The overall effect of index scores and subtests was examined with one-way ANOVA. Univariate analyses and multiple regression models examined demographic and clinical characteristics associated with FSIQ.

Results

Participants who underwent the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children demonstrated impairment on working memory index and participants who underwent the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale showed low score in the subtests that reflect working memory, whereas they exhibited no statistical differences versus the population means for FSIQ. There were no significant differences in the overall effect of index scores and subtests. On univariate analysis, FSIQ were related to time since diagnosis and age at assessment, and both were significant predictors of FSIQ on multiple linear regression.

Conclusions

Survivors of childhood AML exhibited impairment of working memory, even if their FSIQ was within the normal range. Difficulties in specific cognitive domains are associated with reduced quality of life. It is important to identify survivors who are at risk and provide tailored interventions.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) accounts for 25% of all cases of childhood leukemia, and it affects approximately 150–200 patients annually in Japan [1]. Because of improvements in treatment and supportive care over time, event-free survival and overall survival rates for children with AML have approached 60% and 70%, respectively [1, 2]. These improvements have led to an increased focus on late effects in long-term survivors [3, 4]. Recently, late neurocognitive effects among cancer survivors have attracted increasing attention because neurocognitive problems may limit the quality of life and functional outcomes of patients [5].

Although the majority of the literature has focused on evaluating the effects of methotrexate on cognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [5, 6], many chemotherapeutic agents may cause neurocognitive impairment. Several reports described acute cerebral and cerebellar toxicity following treatment with high-dose cytarabine (HD Ara-C) [7,8,9,10], which is used as a standard regimen for AML.

Because chemotherapy for childhood AML also contains neurotoxic agents and intrathecal therapy (IT) [1, 3], neurocognitive sequelae may occur in AML survivors. Nevertheless, few studies have examined neurocognitive outcomes associated with childhood AML.

This study evaluated the development of late cognitive effects following AML treatment in children with a focus on general intellectual ability and specific neurocognitive domains. In addition, we explored the associations of neurocognitive performance with clinical and demographic factors.

Methods

Participants

The inclusion criteria for this cross-sectional study were as follows: (1) diagnosis of AML or acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL); (2) < 20 years of age at diagnosis; (3) ≥ 1 year off treatment during a continuous first remission; and (4) receipt of chemotherapy with HD Ara-C. Survivors were excluded if they had been diagnosed with a specific neurodevelopmental disorder such as Down syndrome, if their primary language was not Japanese, or if they had developed any relapse or second malignancy prior to neurocognitive testing. Survivors who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were not excluded. The Institutional Review Board of the Japanese Red Cross Narita Hospital approved this study (Approval Number: 526–01). Informed consent for participation and medical record release was obtained from survivors or their proxies (for participants younger than 20 years), and assent was obtained from survivors where appropriate.

Treatment protocol

In this study, patients with AML were treated with regimens primarily used in the AML-05 or AML-12 trials, both of which were nationwide multicenter studies conducted by the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group. The treatment protocols in these trials consisted of two courses of induction therapy and three to four courses of intensification therapy with cytarabine, etoposide, mitoxantrone, idarubicin, and an age-adjusted dose of triple intrathecal therapy. Central nervous system (CNS) disease was defined as either ≥ 5 white blood cells with blasts in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or with clinical and radiographic signs of CNS leukemia. Patients with CNS disease received additional weekly IT until the CSF was clear of blasts. Cranial radiation therapy was not included in the protocols. Allogeneic HSCT was limited to the high-risk group [11,12,13]. The cumulative doses of cytarabine, anthracyclines, and etoposide in the AML-05 and AML-12 trials are noted in Table 1. Japanese trials used a higher cumulative dose of cytarabine than major studies in other countries [11].

Table 1 Cumulative doses of cytotoxic agents in the AML-05 and AML-12 studies

Neurocognitive testing

All participants completed an age-appropriate Japanese version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales to assess general intelligence: the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Third Edition (WPPSI-III) for children younger than 5 years, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) for children aged 5–16 years, and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) for survivors aged 17 years or older. One participant was tested using the WPPSI-III, seven patients were tested using the WISC-IV, and four patients were tested using the WAIS-IV. The WISC-IV and WAIS-IV include the full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ), verbal comprehension index (VCI), perceptual reasoning index (PRI), working memory index (WMI), and processing speed index (PSI). The WPPSI-III includes FSIQ, VCI, PRI, PSI, and a general language composite (GLC), whereas PSI and GLC are extrapolated from supplemental subtests. FSIQ and each index score have a standardized mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) of 100 and 15, respectively. The test was administered by one experienced psychologist under the supervision of another licensed psychologist.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated according to the clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants, including gender, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, history of HSCT, age at assessment, parental educational history, and household income.

A one-sample t-test was used to compare FSIQ and primary index scores (VCI, PRI, WMI, and PSI) to standard scores (M = 100, SD = 15). The WISC-IV and WAIS-IV scores displayed comparability if all common subtests are performed [14]; however, study participants were only tested for core subtests. For this reason, we separately examined primary indices obtained by a group of participants who underwent the WISC-IV or WAIS-IV. Because only one participant was tested with the WPPSI-III and PSI and GLC were not evaluated, we excluded that subject from the analysis of the primary indices. The overall effect of index scores and subtests was tested by one-way ANOVA. Univariate analyses (Fisher’s exact test, t-test, Pearson’s correlation, and Spearman’s correlation) examined demographic and clinical characteristics associated with FSIQ. Demographic and clinical variables identified as statistically significant (p < 0.05) on univariate analysis were included in multiple regression models. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR for R, a modified version of R commander designed to add statistical functions frequently used in biostatistics [15].

Results

Twenty-eight patients < 20 years of age received a diagnosis of AML (n = 26) or AUL (n = 2) from 2006 to 2016. Among them, 18 patients satisfied the eligibility criteria for this study, and neurocognitive data were obtained from 12 patients. The reasons for exclusion or a lack of participation are noted in Fig. 1. On average, participants were 8.0 years old at diagnosis and 12.9 years old at assessment. Of the 12 participants, five received HSCT, three received total-body irradiation, and one presented with CNS disease at diagnosis. Participant with CNS disease showed ≥ 5 white blood cells with blasts in the CSF but without clinical CNS symptoms. Although brain magnetic resonance imaging performed in all patients before the treatment and an intracranial mass was detected in one patient, this patient was regarded CNS-negative because lack of clinical CNS symptoms. None of the participants developed neurological events or toxicity that affected other nervous systems during chemotherapy. One patient had a history of epilepsy, and none of participants had family medical history, such as psychiatric illnesses and epilepsy. Parental education and household income were used as proxies for family socioeconomic status. The full demographic characteristics of the participants are noted in Table 2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient selection

Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics of survivors

The participants’ index scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scales in relation to normative data are summarized in Table 3. The WISC-IV and WAIS-IV were completed by seven and four participants, respectively. Participants who completed the WISC-IV displayed significant impairment on the WMI (t (6) =  − 3.36, p = 0.015, M = 83.3 [95% confidence interval = 71.1–95.4]) but no statistical difference from the normative M for FSIQ and other index scores. Among the participants who underwent the WAIS-IV, FSIQ and the four primary index scores did not differ significantly from the normative M of 100.

Table 3 Neurocognitive outcomes

As presented in Fig. 2, among the subtest scores, the Letter-Number Sequencing subtest score was the lowest (M = 6.9, SD = 3.2) and the Coding subtest score was the highest (M = 12.0, SD = 2.9) in the WISC-IV cases, whereas the Digit Span subtest score was the lowest (M = 9.5, SD = 2.3) and the Arithmetic subtest score was the highest (M = 12.0, SD = 3.7) in the WAIS-IV cases. The Digit Span subtest score was also low in the WISC-IV cases (M = 7.4, SD = 1.8). However, neither group exhibited any significant differences in the overall effect of the index scores and subtests.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) subtest scores. In the WISC-IV cases, the Letter-Number Sequencing subtest score was the lowest (mean [M] = 6.9, standard deviation [SD] = 3.2), and the Coding subtest score was the highest (M = 12.0, SD = 2.9). In the WAIS-IV cases, the Digit Span subtest score was the lowest (M = 9.5, SD = 2.3), and the Arithmetic subtest score was the highest (M = 12.0, SD = 3.7)

The associations between FSIQ and all demographic and clinical variables listed in Table 2 were examined by univariate analysis. The t-test revealed no significant difference in the FSIQ between the WISC-IV and WAIS-IV cases (M = 93.7, SD = 9.3 and M = 105.0, SD = 15.8, respectively, p = 0.16). Among WISC-IV cases, participants aged 10 years and older showed higher FSIQ score than participants under 10 years of age (M = 100.0, SD = 6.1 and M = 85.3, SD = 4.5, respectively, p = 0.017). As presented in Fig. 3, FSIQ was moderately related to the time since diagnosis (rs = 0.59, p = 0.049) and strongly related to age at assessment (r = 0.69, p = 0.013). A longer time since diagnosis and older age at assessment were associated with high FSIQ. Multiple linear regression was performed to predict FSIQ based on the time since diagnosis and age at assessment. A significant regression equation was found (F (2, 9) = 11.74, R2 = 0.66, p = 0.003). The participants’ predicted FSIQ was equal to 76.01 + 2.05 (time since diagnosis) + 0.88 (age at assessment), where time since diagnosis and age at assessment were measured in years. Both time since diagnosis and age at assessment were significant predictors of FSIQ.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Associations of the full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) with the time since diagnosis and age at assessment. Spearman's rank correlation suggested that FSIQ was moderately correlated with the time since diagnosis (rs = 0.59, p = 0.049). Pearson’s correlation coefficient exhibited a strong relationship between FSIQ and the age at assessment (r = 0.69, p = 0.013)

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that following treatment with HD Ara-C for AML, survivors exhibit impairment in working memory compared to population norms despite their comparable FSIQ. In multiple linear regression, we revealed that the time since diagnosis and age at assessment were both associated with FSIQ in survivors.

FSIQ did not differ between our AML survivor sample and Japanese population norms; however, deficits in working memory emerged among AML survivors. This is consistent with the findings of a recent report by the CCSS group, which suggested that survivors had a relative risk of impairment in at least one neurocognitive domain [16]. It was previously reported that deficits in specific cognitive domains may be unrelated to general intelligence [17]. In this study, participants who underwent the WISC-IV demonstrated significant impairment on the WMI. Participants performed poorly on the Digit Span subtest of the WAIS-IV, but impairment in the WMI score disappeared because of a high Arithmetic subtest score. Previous studies suggested that the Arithmetic subtest is a poor predictor of working memory ability, and the Digit Span and Letter-Number Sequencing subtests would be the strongest predictor variables [18, 19]. Because the Digit Span subtest more strongly reflects working memory than the Arithmetic subtest, working memory appears to be the most vulnerable function following childhood AML treatment.

Cerebellar dysfunction may lead to intellectual disorders, such as disturbances of executive function, including deficient planning, set-shifting, abstract reasoning, working memory, and decreased verbal fluency [20]. Cytarabine is known to cause cerebellar toxicity [7,8,9,10]. Autopsies demonstrated the loss of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum and reactive Bergmann glial cell proliferation in adults following HD Ara-C treatment [21]. Diffuse heterogeneous brain hypoperfusion, identified by single-photon emission computed tomography, has been reported in children with AML who received HD Ara-C [22]. Although we cannot state so categorically, it can be speculated that HD Ara-C treatment may cause late neurocognitive effects because of cerebellar toxicity. Prior research supported an association between chemotherapy for childhood ALL and long-term neurocognitive deficiencies [23]. Although IT in AML treatment is less frequent than in ALL treatment [12, 24]., similar neurocognitive sequelae may occur in AML since it contains same agents (methotrexate, cytarabine, and hydrocortisone) used in ALL treatment.

Several studies have described associations of poor neurocognitive outcomes following childhood cancer treatment with lower socioeconomic status, older age at diagnosis, cranial radiation therapy, and a history of seizures [25, 26]. In our study, a longer time since diagnosis and older age at assessment were significantly related to a higher FSIQ, whereas age at diagnosis, gender, parental education, and household income were not significantly associated with neurocognitive outcomes. The length of schooling or some curriculums might explain participants’ improvement of the weak cognitive domain; however, we could not investigate the relationship between neurocognitive performance and Japanese educational system in this study. The lack of a relationship between FSIQ and these variables could reflect our small sample size. Although some participants underwent HSCT with a total-body irradiation conditioning regimen (maximum, 12 Gray), no significant difference in FSIQ was found between participants who did and did not undergo HSCT. This result is consistent with recent findings suggesting that the risk of neurocognitive dysfunction does not differ between HSCT and chemotherapy-only treatment in patients with AML [16, 27]. We could not assess the impact of seizures on neurocognitive function, as only one survivor had a history of seizures in this study. This patient had pre-existing epilepsy but being without medication because of seizure-free for years.

This study had several limitations. First, the generalizability of the study findings may have been compromised by the small sample size, and our results need to be replicated in a larger sample. Second, the cross-sectional design of this study made it impossible to compare neurocognitive outcomes with baseline data. It is possible that participants in this study might have had an above-average FSIQ prior to diagnosis and that the average results observed in the participants might indicate a decline from a higher baseline level. Third, this study lacked a matched comparison group. Although we tried to use sibling controls, few participants had siblings who were close in age. Thus, we were limited to comparing the outcome to the standard Wechsler Intelligence Scale scores. Finally, although some genetic factors may contribute to individual vulnerability to chemotherapy [28,29,30], we did not examine any patients for genetic polymorphisms. Future studies, including an assessment of genetic polymorphisms, are required to fully understand the association between genetic factors and vulnerability to neurotoxic agents such as Ara-C.

The neurocognitive sequelae in children with AML have been considered more likely to have been caused by leukemia and its complications at presentation rather than by treatment [31]. By contrast, in our study, only one participant was CNS-positive at diagnosis, and no participants exhibited clinical CNS symptoms during treatment. Therefore, it is conceivable that the influence of the primary disease on cognitive function was small in this study.

Conclusions

Participants displayed no impairment in FSIQ, but they had poor performance in working memory. Working memory is responsible for the temporary storage and manipulation of information. It affects all judgments and activities in everyday life, such as conversation, reading, writing, and calculation. Difficulties in specific cognitive domains, even with good general intellectual ability, may affect the quality of life of survivors of childhood AML. Individually administered intelligence test for survivors of childhood AML might be helpful in detecting domains of cognitive vulnerability. Early detection of neurocognitive late effects and development of interventions for survivors with neurocognitive deficit are required to provide survivors with optimal psychosocial care.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALL:

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

AUL:

Acute undifferentiated leukemia

CNS:

Central nervous system

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

FSIQ:

Full-scale intelligence quotient

GLC:

General language composite

HD Ara-C:

High-dose cytarabine

HSCT:

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

IT:

Intrathecal therapy

M:

Standardized mean

PRI:

Perceptual reasoning index

PSI:

Processing speed index

SD:

Standard deviation

VCI:

Verbal comprehension index

WAIS-IV:

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition

WISC-IV:

The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition

WMI:

Working memory index

WPPSI-III:

The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Third Edition for children

References

  1. Taga T, Tomizawa D, Takahashi H, Adachi S. Acute myeloid leukemia in children: current status and future directions. Pediatr Int. 2016;58:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.12865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubnitz JE, Inaba H. Childhood acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2012;159:259–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12040.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Leung W, Hudson MM, Strickland DK, Phipps S, Srivastava DK, Ribeiro RC, Rubnitz JE, Sandlund JT, Kun LE, Bowman LC, Razzouk BI, Mathew P, Shearer P, Evans WE, Pui CH. Late effects of treatment in survivors of childhood acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3273–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.18.3273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Landier W, Skinner R, Wallace WH, Hjorth L, Mulder RL, Wong FL, Yasui Y, Bhakta N, Constine LS, Bhatia S, Kremer LC, Hudson MM. Surveillance for late effects in childhood cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2216–22. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.77.0180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kadan-Lottick NS, Zeltzer LK, Liu Q, Yasui Y, Ellenberg L, Gioia G, Robison LL, Krull KR. Neurocognitive functioning in adult survivors of childhood non-central nervous system cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:881–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Meadows AT, Evans AE. Effects of chemotherapy on the central nervous system. A study of parenteral methotrexate in long-term survivors of leukemia and lymphoma in childhood. Cancer. 1976;37:1079–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197602)37:2+%3c1079::aid-cncr2820370815%3e3.0.co;2-d.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stentoft J. The toxicity of cytarabine. Drug Saf. 1990;5:7–27. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199005010-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrios NJ, Tebbi CK, Freeman AI, Brecher ML. Toxicity of high dose Ara-C in children and adolescents. Cancer. 1987;60:165–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19870715)60:2%3c165::aid-cncr2820600207%3e3.0.co;2-g.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Herzig RH, Hines JD, Herzig GP, Wolff SN, Cassileth PA, Lazarus HM, Adelstein DJ, Brown RA, Coccia PF, Strandjord S, et al. Cerebellar toxicity with high-dose cytosine arabinoside. J Clin Oncol. 1987;5:927–32. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1987.5.6.927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nand S, Messmore HL Jr, Patel R, Fisher SG, Fisher RI. Neurotoxicity associated with systemic high-dose cytosine arabinoside. J Clin Oncol. 1986;4:571–5. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1986.4.4.571.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsukimoto I, Tawa A, Horibe K, Tabuchi K, Kigasawa H, Tsuchida M, Yabe H, Nakayama H, Kudo K, Kobayashi R, Hamamoto K, Imaizumi M, Morimoto A, Tsuchiya S, Hanada R. Risk-stratified therapy and the intensive use of cytarabine improves the outcome in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: The AML99 trial from the Japanese childhood AML cooperative study group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4007–13. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.7948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomizawa D, Tawa A, Watanabe T, Saito AM, Kudo K, Taga T, Iwamoto S, Shimada A, Terui K, Moritake H, Kinoshita A, Takahashi H, Nakayama H, Koh K, Kigasawa H, Kosaka Y, Miyachi H, Horibe K, Nakahata T, Adachi S. Excess treatment reduction including anthracyclines results in higher incidence of relapse in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in children. Leukemia. 2013;27:2413–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomizawa D, Tanaka S, Hasegawa D, Iwamoto S, Hiramatsu H, Kiyokawa N, Miyachi H, Horibe K, Saito AM, Taga T, Adachi S. Evaluation of high-dose cytarabine in induction therapy for children with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a study protocol of the Japan children’s cancer group multi-center seamless Phase II–III randomized trial (JPLSG AML-12). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018;48:587–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyy061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elizabeth O, Lichtenberger ASK. Essentials of WAIS-IV Assessment. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stefanski KJ, Anixt JS, Goodman P, Bowers K, Leisenring W, Scott Baker K, Burns K, Howell R, Davies S, Robison LL, Armstrong GT, Krull KR, Recklitis C. Long-term neurocognitive and psychosocial outcomes after acute myeloid leukemia: A childhood cancer survivor study report. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113(4):481–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman NP, Miyake A, Corley RP, Young SE, Defries JC, Hewitt JK. Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychol Sci. 2006;17:172–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shelton JT, Metzger RL, Elliott EM. Modified lag task as a measure of working memory. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:482–93. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hill BD, Elliott EM, Shelton JT, Pella RD, O’Jile JR, Gouvier WD. Can we improve the clinical assessment of working memory? An evaluation of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition using a working memory criterion construct. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;32:315–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390903032529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmahmann JD. Disorders of the cerebellum: ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;16:367–78. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.16.3.367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pellier I, Leboucher B, Rachieru P, Ifrah N, Rialland X. Flushing out of cerebrospinal fluid as a therapy for acute cerebellar dysfunction caused by high dose of cytosine arabinoside: a case report. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006;28:837–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0b013e31802d3e2d.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Véra P, Rohrlich P, Stiévenart JL, Elmaleh M, Duval M, Bonnin F, Bok B, Vilmer E. Contribution of single-photon emission computed tomography in the diagnosis and follow-up of CNS toxicity of a cytarabine-containing regimen in pediatric leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2804–10. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.9.2804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iyer NS, Balsamo LM, Bracken MB, Kadan-Lottick NS (2015) Chemotherapy-only treatment effects on long-term neurocognitive functioning in childhood ALL survivors: A review and meta-analysis. Blood. 16;126(3):346–353. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-02-627414.

  24. Pui CH, Campana D, Pei D, Bowman WP, Sandlund JT, Kaste SC, Ribeiro RC, Rubnitz JE, Raimondi SC, Onciu M, Coustan-Smith E, Kun LE, Jeha S, Cheng C, Howard SC, Simmons V, Bayles A, Metzger ML, Boyett JM, Leung W, Handgretinger R, Downing JR, Evans WE, Relling MV. Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2730–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hardy KK, Embry L, Kairalla JA, Helian S, Devidas M, Armstrong D, Hunger S, Carroll WL, Larsen E, Raetz EA, Loh ML, Yang W, Relling MV, Noll RB, Winick N. Neurocognitive functioning of children treated for high-risk B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia randomly assigned to different methotrexate and corticosteroid treatment strategies: a report from the children’s oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2700–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.7587.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Brinkman TM, Krasin MJ, Liu W, Armstrong GT, Ojha RP, Sadighi ZS, Gupta P, Kimberg C, Srivastava D, Merchant TE, Gajjar A, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Krull KR. Long-term neurocognitive functioning and social attainment in adult survivors of pediatric CNS tumors: Results from the st jude lifetime cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1358–67. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.2589.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhatt NS, Baassiri MJ, Liu W, Bhakta N, Chemaitilly W, Ehrhardt MJ, Inaba H, Krull K, Ness KK, Rubnitz JE, Srivastava D, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Mulrooney DA. Late outcomes in survivors of childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the St Jude lifetime cohort study. Leukemia. 2021;35:2258–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01134-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Di Francia R, Crisci S, De Monaco A, Cafiero C, Re A, Iaccarino G, De Filippi R, Frigeri F, Corazzelli G, Micera A, Pinto A. Response and toxicity to cytarabine therapy in leukemia and lymphoma: from dose puzzle to pharmacogenomic biomarkers. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:966. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13050966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krull KR, Bhojwani D, Conklin HM, Pei D, Cheng C, Reddick WE, Sandlund JT, Pui CH. Genetic mediators of neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2182–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.46.7944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Krull KR, Hardy KK, Kahalley LS, Schuitema I, Kesler SR. Neurocognitive outcomes and interventions in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2181–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Temming P, Jenney MEM. The neurodevelopmental sequelae of childhood leukaemia and its treatment. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:936–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.153809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all AML survivors for their participation in the survey. In addition, we would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ST, SS, YT and TT contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by ST, SS, SI and HD. YT and TT supervised the project. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ST, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoko Takahashi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of the Japanese Red Cross Narita Hospital approved this study (Approval Number: 526–01).

Written informed consent for participation and medical record release was obtained from survivors over the age of 16 and proxies (for participants younger than 20 years). Assent was obtained from survivors where appropriate.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takahashi, S., Sato, S., Igarashi, S. et al. Neurocognitive deficits in survivors of childhood acute myeloid leukemia. BMC Pediatr 22, 298 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03369-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03369-0

Keywords