Skip to main content

Predictors of central and general obesity in Iranian preschool children: which anthropometric indices can be used as screening tools?

Abstract

Aim

To compare the ability of anthropometric indices [waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), neck-to-height ratio (NHR), conicity index (CI), body adiposity index (BAI), tri-ponderal mass index (TMI) and body mass index (BMI)] and,measuerments like neck(NC), hip(HC) and waist circumferences to predict overweight and obesity in Iranian preschool children.

Materials and Methods

A total of 498 Iranian preschool children were included in this case–control study conducted in Tehran, Iran. The participants were selected using the stratified random sampling procedure based on gender and school. Using sex-based receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, we compared the area under the curve and defined the cut-off points for detecting central and general obesity for each index in order to identify the most suitable tools in predicting obesity.

Results

Boys had significantly higher values for NC, WC, WHR, NHR, CI, TMI and BMI as compared to girls, whereas BAI and HC were higher in girls. The area under the curve was calculated for all the possible predictors of central obesity, i.e., NC (0.841–0.860), WC (0.70–0.679), HC (0.785–0.697), WHR (0.446–0.639) and CI (0.773–0.653) in boys and girls, respectively. And according to the ROC curve analysis, BMI (0.959–0.948), TMI (0.988–0.981), WHtR (0.667–0.553) and NHR (0.785–0.769) were predictors of general obesity and NC (0.841–0.860) as predictor of central obesity in boys and girls, respectively. The optimal cut-off points for TMI (13.80–15.83), NC (28.68–27.5) and for other anthropometric indices were estimated in both boys and girls.

Conclusion

TMI and NC seem to predict general and central obesity in Iranian preschool children.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Childhood overweight and obesity, along with global obesity, are some of the most important public health threats worldwide but have received insufficient attention until now [1]. The World Health Organization reports show that overweight and obesity rates in children under the age of 5 and in the 5–18 years age group are 38 and 380 million, respectively [2]. Moreover, this widespread obesity epidemic has augmented the burden of non-communicable diseases [3]. For example, it was estimated that, in 2014, the cost of medicine for a 10-year-old child diagnosed with obesity versus a normal-weight child of the same age would cost the United States healthcare system about $12,660—$19,630 [4].

Scientists have proven that overweight and obesity are potential risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease in later life [5]. As we are faced with an increasing prevalence of chronic disorders, e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and others, there has been a recent focus on detecting which subjects are at risk of developing pediatric overweight and (or) obesity [6, 7].

Routine screening in children should be considered by healthcare providers in a more targeted and serious way. The early assessment of the risk of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents requires practical, widely available, easier to implement and more accurate methods than the existing ones [8,9,10]. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [11] and computed tomography (CT) [12] have been considered the gold standard techniques due to their accuracy, they require high costs, are not publicly available to all populations, pose the risk of radiation and their routine use in low/middle income countries is not practical [13]. Over the last decade, researchers have become increasingly interested in anthropometric measurements, e.g., waist or hip circumferences, as potential screening tools for obesity pediatric units [14]. Moreover, neck circumference has been recently assessed in the evaluation of cardiovascular risk and trunk obesity [15, 16]. Although the BMI is the most widely used indicator of weight-for-height status in all age and sex groups [17], unfortunately it is unable to distinguish between lean and fat mass [18]. On the other hand, some studies have shown that, in some children and adults, a normal BMI can co-exist with abdominal obesity [19]. Moreover, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) predicts the risk of cardio-metabolic diseases, metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemia in children and adults, respectively [20,21,22]. It seems that the evaluation of waist circumference (WC) along with height and weight can predict the conical shape changes of the body in humans [23]. Although WC is a good indicator of visceral fat, it cannot determine the total body fat [24]. Nowadays, several indices, e.g. the conicity index (CI) [25], the ponderal index [26] and the body adiposity index (BAI) [27], have attracted the attention of researchers worldwide, as they can be easily computed from variables such as height, weight and hip circumference and are feasible indicators of the percentage of body fat and abdominal obesity, respectively [28, 29]. According to the existing evidence, the assessment of visceral fat is more valuable in the evaluation of cardiovascular risk, as it is linked to the distribution of fat mass than the total fat mass [30]. Therefore, indices that can be computed from waist and hip measurements can be more relevant in our clinical practice. In addition, as WC is usually measured relatively to height, misclassification may occur in the anthropometric assessment of tall or short people [30, 31]. However, it reflects abdominal obesity, insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk more accurately [32, 33], and thus the employment of more sensible indices, i.e., the conicity index (CI), tri-ponderal mass index (TMI) and the body adiposity index (BAI) is required. A cross-sectional study conducted in China in 2019 illustrated that the WHR, WHtR and abdominal fat percentage are indicators of abdominal obesity in children aged 6 to 9 years [34]. In a study involving Brazilian children, Nascimento reported that the TMI was a more accurate tool in the prediction of obesity [26]. Given the importance of timely and accurate screening of childhood obesity, it seems that, in different societies, various tools need to be evaluated and compared to identify which are the most reliable instruments in the prediction of this disorder. The aim of our study was to compare the ability of the BMI, TMI, neck-to-height ratio (NHR), BAI, WHtR, NC, WC, hip circumference (HC), CI and WHR ratio in the prediction of central and general obesity in Iranian preschool children.

Methods

Participants

This present case–control study was conducted during 2018–2019 in preschool children from Tehran, Iran. A number of 245 normal-weight and 253 children with overweight and obesity from all over Tehran were included in the study. Using the random sampling method, a total of 20 schools of Tehran were randomly selected. The number of schools selected for sampling was equal in both sexes. Matching were done based on class and sex. All the participants were invited to partake in anthropometric measurements. We included preschool children who were singletons and were 6 years of age. The children, who were born prematurely, were twins or resulted from a multiple birth, or who were suffering from growth hormone disorders, metabolic disorders (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and diabetes), heart disease, renal dysfunctions or bone diseases were excluded from the study. Based on world health organization growth chart,the body mass index (BMI) percentiles for age in both sexes were calculated and the children were divided into two groups: overweight/obese and normal-weight. All children with overweight and obesity were grouped as obese. This study was approved by the research council and ethics committee Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to participation.

Anthropometry measurement

A trained nutritionist measured the weight and height of children under standard conditions. The children were asked to wear light clothing and remove their shoes in order to have their weights and heights assessed. Standing weight and height were evaluated using a electronicdigital scale (to the nearest 0.5 kg) and a portable stadiometer (to the nearest 0.5 cm) manufactured both by SECA (Hamburg, Germany), respectively. Several circumferences, e.g., waist circumference (WC) at the umbilical level, hip circumference at the widest part of the buttocks, and the neck circumference (NC) in between mid-cervical spine and mid-anterior level, were measured using an Seca brand anthropometric tape (to the nearest 0.1 cm) in a relaxed position. The measurements were repeated 2–3 times and the mean of the results was calculated.

Calculation of indices and ratios

We calculated the WHR as WC (cm) divided by height (in cm), the WHtR as WC (in cm) divided by hip circumference (cm), and the NHR as NC (in cm) divided by height (in cm). The BMI and TMI were estimated by dividing the weight (in kg) to the squared-height (in m2) and the weight (in kg) to cubed-height (in cm3), respectively. The CI was calculated based on WC, weight and height using the Valdez's formula [35]. The BAI was computed from the hip circumference and the height based on the formula reported by Aarbaoui et al. [36], taking into account the over/under estimation of body fat in pediatrics. The employed formulas are depicted below:

$$\mathrm{Body}\ \mathrm{Adiposity}\ \mathrm{Index}\ \left(\mathrm{BAI}\right):\kern0.5em \mathrm{hip}\ \mathrm{circumference}\ \left(\mathrm{cm}\right)/{\mathrm{height}}^{0.8}\ \left(\mathrm{m}\right)$$
$$\mathrm{Tri}-\mathrm{ponderal}\ \mathrm{Mass}\ \mathrm{Index}\ \left(\mathrm{TMI}\right):\mathrm{weight}\ \left(\mathrm{kg}\right)/{\mathrm{height}}^3\ \left({\mathrm{cm}}^3\right)$$
$$\mathrm{Conicity}\ \mathrm{Index}\ \left(\mathrm{CI}\right):\mathrm{waist}\ \left(\mathrm{m}\right)/0.109\surd \left[\mathrm{weight}\ \left(\mathrm{kg}\right)/\mathrm{height}\ \left(\mathrm{m}\right)\right]$$
$$\mathrm{Body}\ \mathrm{Mass}\ \mathrm{Index}\ \left(\mathrm{BMI}\right):\mathrm{weight}\ \left(\mathrm{kg}\right)/{\mathrm{height}}^2\ \left({\mathrm{m}}^2\right)$$

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20.0. The variables were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The descriptive analyses were performed using frequencies (95% confidence intervals, CI) and medians (interquartile ranges) and the comparison of medians between two independent groups by the Mann–Whitney test. The Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare the frequencies of WC, WHtR, NC, HC, WHR, TMI, BAI and CI. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the ability of anthropometric measurements as obesity predictors. In addition, the cut-off points for excess central fat were estimated using the best sensitivity and specificity for the different measurements. The hypotheses were tested at a 5% significance level.

Results

Characteristics of subjects

In this case–control study, boys represented 48% and 52.8% of the obese and normal-weight preschool children, respectively. Of the 253 children in the case group, the prevalence of overweight and obesity was 62% and 38%, respectively. The mean age of the participants was 6.38 years. The averages of all measured indices in cases versus controls were: BMI (20.82 versus 15.79 kg/m2), NC (29.17 versus 26.12 cm), HC (73.79 versus 68.54 cm), WC (61.38 versus 57.36 cm), CI (1.13 versus 1.21), PI (17.45 versus 13.38), WHR (0.832 versus 0.835) and WHtR (0.51 versus 0.48) (data not shown).

The anthropometric indices of the preschool children stratified by sex are represented in Table 1. As compared to boys, girls showed a tendency for lower values of the following indices: weight, height, NC, WC, HC, WHR, WHtR, CI and PI. However, HC and BAI were higher in girls versus boys (P < 0.05 for all).

Table 1 The anthropometric characteristics of the participants stratified based on the presence of obesity/normal-weight

Performance of anthropometric measurements

The sex-based receiver-operating characteristic curves for all the anthropometric indices employed as predicting tools for the detection of pediatric central and general obesity are represented in Table 2 and Figs. 12. In addition, the cut-off points are specified for the all reported variables. ​The ROC curves showed that, in both sexes, the anthropometric indices related to central obesity, i.e., NC, WC, CI and HC were predictors of obesity in 6-year-old children, with the exception of WHR in boys. Moreover, the ROC curves revealed that TMI, BMI, NHR and BAI were predictors of central obesity in both sexes. However, the AUC for WHtR was reported only for boys.

Table 2 Sex-based comparison of the Receiver-Operator Characteristic curves for various anthropometric indices evaluated as predictors for central and general obesity among preschool children
Fig. 1
figure 1

Receiver operation curve for the prediction of central obesity in Iranian preschool children. The relative abilities of neck circumference, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist to hip ratio, and conicity index are compared to normal-weight children in both sexes 

Fig. 2
figure 2

Receiver operation curve for the prediction of general obesity in Iranian preschool children. The relative abilities of tri-ponderal index, body mass index, neck-to-height ratio, body adiposity index and waist-to-height ratio are compared to normal weight children in both sex

Overall, we discovered that, of all the general obesity indices, TMI and BMI were the best predictors of general obesity based on their AUC values, both in boys (0.988 and 0.959, respectively) and in girls (0.981 and 0.948, respectively). In addition, NC was a good predictor of central obesity in both boys and girls (AUC: 0.85 and 0.84, respectively).

Discussion

In the current population-based study, we demonstrated that the TMI was a better predictor as compared to the BMI in identifying general obesity in pediatric subjects. Moreover, the NC was a suitable tool in screening for central obesity in preschool children. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first attempt to compare anthropometric indices in the detection of pediatric obesity in Iranian children. In addition, for the first time, the CI, BAI and TMI were computed and evaluated in a population of preschool Iranian children.

Nowadays, due to the increasing prevalence of obesity, researchers have focused their attention also on the period of adipose rebound (ages 5 to 7 years) [37] during which the screening for pediatric obesity using accurate methods might be of paramount importance to prevent its development [38]. Therefore, we suggest that the screening be done more carefully and precisely during this time frame. Thus, it is necessary to identify which screening tools are the most accessible, inexpensive and can be employed by medical practitioners worldwide in different health settings [39].

Our results demonstrated that the BMI and the TMI were the best predictors of pediatric obesity. Similar findings have also been documented by Lorenzo et al. [40], Nascimento et al. [26] and Khoshhali et al. [41]. For example, Lorenzo et al. [40] conducted a cross-sectional study in Italian preschool children and discovered that both the TMI and the BMI were able to anticipate the development of obesity in children aged 12 to 18 years. Similarly, Nascimento et al. [26] reported that the TMI was a predictor of obesity in Brazilian children aged 2 to 5 years. Based on the results of the CASPIAN-V study conducted in Iran, Khoshhal et al. [41] concluded that the BMI and the TMI had medium predictive value for the installment of the metabolic syndrome in subjects aged 12 to 18 years. We observed that, in the prediction of obesity, the optimal TMI and BMI cut-off points were 13.83 and 17.55 in boys, respectively, and 15.83 and 17.10 in girls, respectively.

Similarly to Filgueiras et al. [42], we indicated that the CI is an appropriate indicator of fat distribution in children. It is also noteworthy to mention that differences in the CI may occur due to race or ethnicity or may vary between pediatric age groups and adulthood [43]. Thus, other complementary indices are needed to assess its ability to predict the development of overweight and obesity in children [44]. Our findings delineate that both the NC and the neck-to-height ratio were moderate predictors of pediatric obesity. The same conclusion has also been reached by Nimawat et al. [45], Nafiu et al. [46] and Taheri et al. [15]. For instance, Nimawat et al. [45] evaluated Nigerian children and reported a positive correlation between the NC and the BMI, reinforcing that the measurement of the NC is a simple, accurate and quick method in screening and classifying childhood obesity. The neck-to-height ratio has also been explored to detect obstructive sleep apnea syndrome [47] and has been proven to reflect body fat distribution and to be associated with the presence of metabolic disturbances, hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders [48]. Our results showed that boys have a greater WC versus girls. Stupnicki et al. [49], McCarthy et al. [50] and Ashwell et al. [51] have also compared WC in boys and girls. Stupnicki et al. [49] assessed a cohort of Polish children, indicating that boys had smaller WC versus girls. Furthermore, a large cohort study from the United States of America conducted by Li et al. [52] illustrated that girls had higher WC versus boys irrespective of age. In addition, in the present study, we noted that the WHtR, which has been employed in several studies as a predictor of pediatric and adult obesity, was a predictor of obesity in boys alone. A possible explanation of this phenomenon can be related to the differences in the distribution of body fat between boys and girls [53].

In the current study, we discovered that the AUC for WHR was above the baseline only in girls (girls: 0.639 and boys: 0.446). We suggest that this finding might be explained by the sex-related differences in the skeletal structure of the children enrolled in our research, as well as a greater hip circumference in girls versus boys which might indicate a higher percentage of fat in girls. Interestingly, in the recent study on pediatric subjects published by Turcotte et al. [54], several genetic factors, i.e., the HOXC13 rs1443512 and GS genes, influenced the WHR in Mexican girl only. This finding may be due to the effects of gender differences on the incidence genetic polymorphisms that influence WHR. In another research, it was proposed that the WHtR was representative of the total body fat, while WHR was more predictive of the abdominal obesity versus other indices, e.g., WHtR, WC or HC [55].

We reported that the BAI was higher in obese versus normal-weight children in both sexes. In addition, the ROC curve showed a moderate prognostic value of BAI for the risk of obesity in children (boys: 0.749 and girls: 0.651). This finding was in line with the papers published by Aarbaoui et al. [36], Yu et al. [56] and Filgueiras et al. [42]. For example, Filgueiras et al. [42] reported, based on the results of a cross-sectional study, that the AUCs for BAI were higher-than-expected AUCs both sexes in terms of predicting obesity in Brazilian children and adolescents. As previously suggested, the estimation of the body fat percentage can be conducted using advanced tools such as the dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technique which provides accurate results. However, it has several disadvantages and many of researchers tend to employ more convenient and acceptable methods to estimate fat mass, e.g., the BAI.

Prior studies have described that changes occur in the body composition before puberty, particularly in preschool children from different populations [57]. In the study of Horvat et al. [58], Croatian children aged 6.5 years experienced an increase in fat mass and a muscle mass loss during a 5-year period (1998–2003).

Our study has several strengths. The main strength of this research is that we evaluated and compared various practical anthropometric indices which are easy to calculate, inexpensive and come with negligible errors. Moreover, we assessed, for the first time, the TMI, NC-to-height ratio and BAI of preschool Iranian children. One of the limitations of the present study is the lack of comparison of fat percentage with precision instruments such as DXA, thus the misclassification of some subjects as obese may lead to errors in the interpretation of our findings, and one of the important limitation in this study were lack of assessing anthropometric indices with gold standard methods like magnetic resonance imaging. we suggest that in future studies, gold standard methods such as DEXA and tomography be used to determine body fat percentage. Because of financial constraints and limitations, we were unable to use these methods and as an another limitation of our study,the design of the study was case–control, and it seems that other methods, such as cohort and interventional design, could better predict childhood obesity based on anthropometric methods and obesity related indexes."

In addition, it would have been better to compare a wider age range of the pediatric population.

We suggest that, in future studies, other obesity assessment tools, e.g., WC-to-weight and mid-upper arm circumferences can be used in wider age ranges to improve the available obesity screening tools.

Conclusion

In Iranian preschool children, the BMI and the TMI are the best predictors of general obesity, whereas the NC is the best predictor of central obesity, as compared to a wide range of anthropometric indices.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available upon request from the corresponding author for the article due to privacy / ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Boutrid N, Rahmoune H, Radoui A. An Increasing “Heavy” Burden: Child Obesity and Overweight. Metabolism-Clinical and Experimental. 2021;116.

  2. Cheater S. The obesity epidemic: time for a positive national healthy eating strategy. Int J Health Promot Educ. 2020;58(1):51–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelishadi R, Heidari-Beni M. Prevention and Control of Childhood Obesity: The Backbone in Prevention of Non Communicable Disease. Primordial Prevention of Non Communicable Disease: Springer; 2019. p. 61–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hruby A, Hu FB. The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(7):673–89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luca AC, Iordache C. Obesity–a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2013;117(1):65–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Balbus JM, Barouki R, Birnbaum LS, Etzel RA, Gluckman PD, Grandjean P, et al. Early-life prevention of non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2013;381(9860).

  7. Liria R. Consequences of obesity in children and teenagers: a problem that requires attention. Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica. 2012;29(3):357–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simmonds M, Burch J, Llewellyn A, Griffiths C, Yang H, Owen C, et al. The use of measures of obesity in childhood for predicting obesity and the development of obesity-related diseases in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). 2015;19(43):1–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Himes JH. Challenges of accurately measuring and using BMI and other indicators of obesity in children. Pediatrics. 2009;124(Supplement 1):s3–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatipoglu N, Mazicioglu MM, Kurtoglu S, Kendirci M. Neck circumference: an additional tool of screening overweight and obesity in childhood. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(6):733–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karlsson AK, Kullberg J, Stokland E, Allvin K, Gronowitz E, Svensson PA, et al. Measurements of total and regional body composition in preschool children: a comparison of MRI, DXA, and anthropometric data. Obesity. 2013;21(5):1018–24.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Samara A, Ventura E, Alfadda A, Goran M. Use of MRI and CT for fat imaging in children and youth: what have we learned about obesity, fat distribution and metabolic disease risk? Obes Rev. 2012;13(8):723–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel R, Rodriguez A, Yasmeen T, Drever ED. Impact of obesity on osteoporosis: limitations of the current modalities of assessing osteoporosis in obese subjects. Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism. 2015;13(1):36–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Trandafir LM, Russu G, Moscalu M, Miron I, Lupu VV, Constantin MML, et al. Waist circumference a clinical criterion for prediction of cardio-vascular complications in children and adolescences with overweight and obesity. Medicine. 2020;99(30).

  15. Taheri M, Kajbaf TZ, Taheri M-R, Aminzadeh M. Neck circumference as a useful marker for screening overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. Oman Med J. 2016;31(3):170.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Androutsos O, Grammatikaki E, Moschonis G, Roma-Giannikou E, Chrousos G, Manios Y, et al. Neck circumference: a useful screening tool of cardiovascular risk in children. Pediatr Obes. 2012;7(3):187–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adab P, Pallan M, Whincup PH. Is BMI the best measure of obesity? : British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2018.

  18. Vanderwall C, Clark RR, Eickhoff J, Carrel AL. BMI is a poor predictor of adiposity in young overweight and obese children. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rothman KJ. BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity. Int J Obes. 2008;32(3):S56–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perona JS, Schmidt Rio-Valle J, Ramírez-Vélez R, Correa-Rodríguez M, Fernández-Aparicio Á, González-Jiménez E. Waist circumference and abdominal volume index are the strongest anthropometric discriminators of metabolic syndrome in Spanish adolescents. Eur J Clin Invest. 2019;49(3): e13060.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rönnecke E, Vogel M, Bussler S, Grafe N, Jurkutat A, Schlingmann M, et al. Age-and sex-related percentiles of skinfold thickness, waist and hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio: results from a population-based pediatric cohort in Germany (LIFE child). Obes Facts. 2019;12(1):25–39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin M-S, Lin T-H, Guo S-E, Tsai M-H, Chiang M-S, Huang T-J, et al. Waist-to-height ratio is a useful index for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: a secondary data analysis. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Asif M, Aslam M, Altaf S. Evaluation of anthropometric parameters of central obesity in Pakistani children aged 5–12 years, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2018;31(9):971–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Patil C, Deshmukh J, Yadav S, Patil S, Sheikh A. Neck circumference: A novel anthropometric tool for screening obesity in adults. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health. 2017;9(7):0-.

  25. Sant'Anna M, Tinôco A, Rosado LdL, Sant'Ana LdR, Brito IdS, Araújo L, et al. Effectiveness of the conicity index and waist to height ratio to predict the percentage of body fat in children. Nutrire-Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Alimentação e Nutrição. 2010;35(2):67–80.

  26. Nascimento VG, Bertoli CJ, Gallo PR, Abreu LCd, Leone C. Tri-ponderal mass index: a screening tool for risk of central fat accumulation in Brazilian preschool children. Medicina. 2019;55(9):577.

  27. Javed A, Jumean M, Murad MH, Okorodudu D, Kumar S, Somers V, et al. Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Obes. 2015;10(3):234–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dobashi K, Takahashi K, Nagahara K, Tanaka D, Itabashi K. Evaluation of hip/heightp ratio as an index for adiposity and metabolic complications in obese children: comparison with waist-related indices. Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2016:35311.

  29. Zaniqueli D, Oliosa PR, Neves FS, Pani VO, Martins CR, de Souza Peçanha MA, et al. Ponderal index classifies obesity in children and adolescents more accurately than body mass index z-scores. Pediatr Res. 2019;86(1):128–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Elffers TDW, De Mutsert R, Lamb HJ, De Roos A, Van Dijk JKW, Rosendaal FR, et al. Body fat distribution, in particular visceral fat, is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in women with obesity. Atherosclerosis. 2017;263: e175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lam BCC, Koh GCH, Chen C, Wong MTK, Fallows SJ. Comparison of body mass index (BMI), body adiposity index (BAI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in an adult population in Singapore. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4): e0122985.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Savva S, Tornaritis M, Savva M, Kourides Y, Panagi A, Silikiotou N, et al. Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index. Int J Obes. 2000;24(11):1453–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou D, Yang M, Yuan Z-P, Zhang D-D, Liang L, Wang C-L, et al. Waist-to-Height Ratio: a simple, effective and practical screening tool for childhood obesity and metabolic syndrome. Prev Med. 2014;67:35–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen G, Yan H, Hao Y, Shrestha S, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Comparison of various anthropometric indices in predicting abdominal obesity in Chinese children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Valdez R. A simple model-based index of abdominal adiposity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(9):955–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. El Aarbaoui T, Samouda H, Zitouni D, Di Pompeo C, De Beaufort C, Trincaretto F, et al. Does the body adiposity index (BAI) apply to paediatric populations? Ann Hum Biol. 2013;40(5):451–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rolland-Cachera M-F, Cole T. Does the age at adiposity rebound reflect a critical period? Int J Pediatr Obes. 2019;14(1):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brown CL, Halvorson EE, Cohen GM, Lazorick S, Skelton JA. Addressing childhood obesity: opportunities for prevention. Pediatr Clin. 2015;62(5):1241–61.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Iragorri N, Spackman E. Assessing the value of screening tools: reviewing the challenges and opportunities of cost-effectiveness analysis. Public Health Rev. 2018;39(1):1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. De Lorenzo A, Romano L, Di Renzo L, Gualtieri P, Salimei C, Carrano E, et al. Triponderal mass index rather than body mass index: An indicator of high adiposity in Italian children and adolescents. Nutrition. 2019 Apr;60:41–7. PubMed PMID: 30529185. Epub 2018/12/12. eng.

  41. Khoshhali M, Heidari-Beni M, Qorbani M, Motlagh ME, Ziaodini H, Heshmat R, et al. Tri-ponderal mass index and body mass index in prediction of pediatric metabolic syndrome: the CASPIAN-V study. Archives of endocrinology and metabolism. 2020;64(2):171–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Filgueiras MDS, Vieira SA, de Almeida Fonseca PC, Pereira PF, Ribeiro AQ, Priore SE, et al. Waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio and conicity index to evaluate android fat excess in Brazilian children. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(1):140–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ononamadu CJ, Ihegboro GO, Ezekwesili CN, Onyeukwu OF, Umeoguaju UF, Ezeigwe OC. Comparative analysis of anthropometric indices of obesity as correlates and potential predictors of risk for hypertension and prehypertension in a population in Nigeria. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2017;28(2):92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gaya AR, Brand C, Dias AF, Gaya ACA, Lemes VB, Mota J. Obesity anthropometric indicators associated with cardiometabolic risk in Portuguese children and adolescents. Preventive medicine reports. 2017;8:158–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jindal M, Masand R, Nimawat AK, Natani BS, Verma CR. Neck circumference and waist circumference as a tool for evaluating obesity. Indian Journal of Child Health. 2020;7(4):159–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nafiu OO, Burke C, Lee J, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tremper KK. Neck circumference as a screening measure for identifying children with high body mass index. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):e306–10.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ho AW, Moul DE, Krishna J. Neck circumference-height ratio as a predictor of sleep related breathing disorder in children and adults. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016;12(3):311–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Selvan C, Dutta D, Thukral A, Nargis T, Kumar M, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Neck height ratio is an important predictor of metabolic syndrome among Asian Indians. Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. 2016;20(6):831.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stupnicki R, Tomaszewski P, Milde K, Glogowska J, Poplawska H. Waist-to-height ratio (WtHR): proposed approach to establishing reference values for children and youths. Papers on Anthropology. 2013;22:214–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. McCarthy H, Jarrett K, Crawley H. The development of waist circumference percentiles in British children aged 5.0–16.9 y. European Journal Of Clinical Nutrition. 2001;55(10):902–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ashwell M, Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio as an indicator of ‘early health risk’: simpler and more predictive than using a ‘matrix’based on BMI and waist circumference. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3): e010159.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Li C, Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Cook S. Recent trends in waist circumference and waist-height ratio among US children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):e1390–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Taylor RW, Grant AM, Williams SM, Goulding A. Sex differences in regional body fat distribution from pre-to postpuberty. Obesity. 2010;18(7):1410–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Turcotte M, Abadi A, Peralta-Romero J, Suarez F, Reddon H, Gomez-Zamudio J, et al. Genetic contribution to waist-to-hip ratio in Mexican children and adolescents based on 12 loci validated in European adults. Int J Obes. 2019;43(1):13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Santos S, Severo M, Lopes C, Oliveira A. Anthropometric indices based on waist circumference as measures of total and abdominal adiposity in children. Maternal and Infant Adiposity.133.

  56. Yu Y, Wang L, Liu H, Zhang S, Walker SO, Bartell T, et al. Body mass index and waist circumference rather than body adiposity index are better surrogates for body adiposity in a Chinese population. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30(2):274–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Leskinen T, Eloranta A-M, Tompuri T, Saari A, Ollila H, Mäkelä J, et al. Changes in body composition by age and obesity status in preschool-aged children: the STEPS study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021;75(1):57–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Horvat V, Mišigoj-Duraković M, Prskalo I. Body size and body composition change trends in preschool children over a period of five years. Coll Antropol. 2009;33(1):99–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the children and their parents who agreed to partake in the present study.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.M. and F.S.H. designed and conducted the research. F.M., M.N. and H.B. analyzed the data. F.M. and F.S.H. interpreted the findings. F.M., S.F., MH.S, F.S.H. and M.-A.G. wrote the paper. F.S.H. and F.M. had the primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzad Shidfar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the research council and ethics committee Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. We confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Also, we confirming that informed consent was obtained from a parent and/or legal guardians of the participants (control as well as patients).​

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

We, the authors, declare that we had no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mardali, F., Naziri, M., Sohouli, M. et al. Predictors of central and general obesity in Iranian preschool children: which anthropometric indices can be used as screening tools?. BMC Pediatr 22, 320 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03365-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03365-4

Keywords

  • Obesity
  • Overweight
  • Conicity index
  • Ponderal index
  • Body mass index
  • Waist circumference
  • Waist to hip ratio