Skip to main content
Download PDF

Knowledge and practice of mothers towards sunshine exposure of their children in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Pediatrics volume 22, Article number: 213 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Early morning sunlight exposure for infants is a good practice to prevent rickets and alleviate the problem of vitamin D deficiency. Rickets is a major public health problem in many countries especially in developing country including Ethiopia. As mothers are frontline person for their children who should know and practice about sunlight exposure, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the pooled level of knowledge and practice towards sunlight exposure of their children among mothers in Ethiopia.

Methods

PubMed, Google Scholar, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and African Journal of Online (AJOL) were searched. The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel and analyzed using STATA version 14. Publication bias was checked by funnel plot and more objectively through Egger’s regression test, with P < 0.05 considered to indicate potential publication bias. The heterogeneity of studies was checked using I2 statistics. Pooled analysis was conducted using a weighted inverse variance random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was done related to geographic region and time. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was also employed.

Result

A total of 8 studies with 2974 study participants for knowledge, nine studies with 3475 study participants for practice were used to estimate the pooled level of good knowledge and good practice of sunshine exposure among Ethiopian mothers. The overall estimated good level of knowledge and good practice towards sunshine exposure of their children among mothers was found to be 56.08% ((95% CI: 46.26 - 65.89%; I2 = 96.8%) and 55.632% (95%CI: 44.091 - 67.174%; I2 = 98.2%). Regional subgroup analysis showed that the pooled level of good practice in Amhara and Sidama regions found to be 54.41 and 58.32% respectively.

Conclusion

Study findings showed mothers knowledge and practice towards sunshine exposure of children was quite low in Ethiopia. This study therefore recommends that interventions are needed to increase knowledge and practice of sunlight exposure. This study provides much needed significant evidence for making health-policy recommendations for this vulnerable population group.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The healing power of the sun and its use in medical treatment (heliotherapy) has extended back into ancient times starting from about1400 BC [1, 2]. In 1919, the first scientifically established health benefit of sun exposure was realized that sunlight used to prevent and cure rickets [3]. Recently being exposed to ultraviolet radiation has been a subject of epidemiological interest due to both its beneficial and detrimental effects. On the other hand, around 80–90% of vitamin D in human being is sunlight-derived production in the skin [3, 4]. Exposure of the body in bathing suit to one minimal erythemal dose (MED) (i.e. slight redness of the skin is equivalent to taking 10,000 to 25,000 IU vitamin D orally [4, 5].

Even if, Ethiopia is known as a country with 13 months of sunshine (12 months of 30 days each and 13th month of 5 days, which will be 6 days every leap year), children may be at increased risk for vitamin D deficiency because of the limited sun exposure due lack of adequate knowledge about the importance, timing and duration of sun exposure [6, 7].

Childhood rickets is common in low-and middle-income countries, especially the Indian subcontinent, Africa, and the Middle East where about 30% of children aged 0–5 years had at least one sign of nutritional rickets on clinical examination [8, 9] .

Rickets is quite prevalent (41%) among children in Ethiopia and is commonly associated with protein energy malnutrition, infectious diseases of various cause including respiratory tract, anemia, congestive heart failure and gastrointestinal tract risk recurrent diarrhea and mal absorption. The major cause of nutritional rickets in Ethiopian children is lack of exposure to sunshine and/or inadequate intake of vitamin D as its incidence is particularly high in slum children who live in crowded houses almost devoid of sunlight ([10,11,12], and). Low vitamin D status causes demineralization of skeleton and also associated with cardiovascular disease, certain cancers, cognitive decline, depression, diabetes mellitus, pregnancy complications and autoimmune diseases [13]. It contributes to infant mortality and morbidity and carries long-term consequences. Factors influencing caregiver behavior of exposing infants to sunshine, a simple preventive strategy, are not fully understood [14].

Health education to change maternal behavior to expose infants to sunshine was adopted as the main strategy to combat rickets in Ethiopia [10]. However, the implementation of the strategy has remained inconsistent. Besides, health education to change maternal behavior to expose infants to sunshine was adopted as the main strategy to combat rickets in early 1960s, yet the implementation of this strategy was inconsistent. Despite of all this efforts, lack sun light exposure continues to be the major risk factor of vitamin-D deficiency rickets in Ethiopia children ([10, 14, 15], and).

To our knowledge, this study is the first comprehensive national pooled estimate on Knowledge and Practice (KP) with respect to sunshine exposure among mothers in Ethiopia, and these have shown significant differences in KP between the various regions of the country. We therefore conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to provide an estimate of KP with respect sunshine exposure of children among Ethiopian mothers for the purpose of improving program planning and interventions focused on health education targeting the importance of sun exposure during childhood period.

Methods

Searching strategy and source of information

This study was conducted to estimate the pooled level of KP of mothers towards sunshine exposure of their children in Ethiopia. We checked the DARE database (http://www.library.UCSF.edu) and the Cochrane library to ensure this had not been done before and to avoid duplication. We also checked whether there was any similar ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis in the PROSPERO database ((PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017074407); Available from http://www.Crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO_REBRANDING/displayrecord.asp?ID = CRD42017074407. These checks reassured us that there had been no previous similar studies undertaken.

All relevant and published researches in the following databases; PubMed, Google Scholar, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and African Journal of Online (AJOL) were searched. We reviewed grey literature using Google. Unpublished studies were sought from the official website of an international and/or local organization or university.

The following core search terms or phrases were used; knowledge, awareness, practice, sunshine, rickets, vitamin D deficiency, children and mother. Search terms were pre-defined to allow a complete search strategy that included all-important studies. All fields within records and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) and Boolean operators were used to search in the advanced PubMed search engine.

Notably, to fit with the advanced PubMed database the following search strategy was developed using different Boolean operators; ((((((((Knowledge[tw] OR Awareness[tw] OR Practice[tw])) OR (“Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice”[Mesh] OR “Practice Management, Veterinary”[Mesh] OR “Patient Medication Knowledge”[Mesh] OR “Knowledge Discovery”[Mesh] OR “Intraoperative Awareness”[Mesh] OR “Knowledge Management”[Mesh] OR “General Practice”[Mesh] OR “Practice Patterns, Nurses’“[Mesh] OR “Knowledge Bases”[Mesh] OR “Advanced Practice Nursing”[Mesh]))) AND (((Sunshine [tw] OR Sun light [tw])) OR “Sunlight”[Mesh])) AND ((Exposure [tw]) OR (“Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis”[Mesh] OR “Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy”[Mesh] OR “Post-Exposure Prophylaxis”[Mesh] OR “Inhalation Exposure”[Mesh] OR “Paternal Exposure”[Mesh] OR “Maternal Exposure”[Mesh] OR “Occupational Exposure”[Mesh] OR “Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects”[Mesh] OR “Environmental Exposure”[Mesh] OR “Atmosphere Exposure Chambers”[Mesh] OR “Dental Pulp Exposure”[Mesh] OR “Exposure to Violence”[Mesh] OR “Dietary Exposure”[Mesh] OR “Radiation Exposure”[Mesh] OR “War Exposure”[Mesh] OR “Implosive Therapy”[Mesh] OR “Disease Notification”[Mesh]))) AND (((Newborn [tw] OR Infant [tw] OR children [tw])) OR (“Infant, Newborn, Diseases”[Mesh] OR “Infant, Newborn”[Mesh] OR “Infant Welfare”[Mesh] OR “Infant Health”[Mesh] OR “Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn”[Mesh] OR “Infant Death”[Mesh] OR “Infant, Extremely Premature”[Mesh] OR “Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn”[Mesh] OR “Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight”[Mesh] OR “Infant Formula”[Mesh] OR “Diapers, Infant”[Mesh] OR “Adult Children”[Mesh] OR “Disabled Children”[Mesh] OR “Dental Care for Children”[Mesh] OR “Infant, Very Low Birth Weight”[Mesh] OR “Infant Behavior”[Mesh] OR “Infant Equipment”[Mesh]))) AND (((Mother[tw] OR Women [tw])) OR (“Pregnant Women”[Mesh] OR “Kangaroo-Mother Care Method”[Mesh] OR “Women, Working”[Mesh] OR “Women”[Mesh] OR “Physicians, Women”[Mesh] OR “Battered Women”[Mesh] OR “Mother-Child Relations”[Mesh] OR “Dentists, Women”[Mesh] OR “Maternal-Fetal Relations”[Mesh] OR “Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical”[Mesh] OR “Women’s Health Services”[Mesh] OR “Mothers”[Mesh] OR “Postpartum Period”[Mesh] OR “Achard-Thiers syndrome” [Supplementary Concept]))) AND ((Ethiopia [tw]) OR (“Ethiopia”[Mesh] OR “hemoglobin Ethiopia” [Supplementary Concept])). We reviewed studies that assessed KP on sunshine exposure through face to face interviews, self-administered questionnaires or checklist among mothers.

Measurements of KAP

Knowledge: knowledge was assessed based on 10 questions about sunshine exposure that included the benefit, timing, duration and its drawback. Knowledge was defined as good if the respondents scored above the mean level.

Practice: practice was assessed by using 7 questions about the timing, frequency, duration and the condition of sunshine exposure and the respondent was categorized as showing good practice if she scored above the mean level.

Reporting

The results of this review were reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement (PRISMA) guideline [16].

Eligibility criteria

All observational studies, including cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies on KP of mothers towards sunshine exposure of their children were considered for this study. Those studies about KP of sunshine exposure among mothers which were published in English were included and there was no restriction on study period. The level of good knowledge and good practice was calculated using the data presented in the studies. Papers were excluded if they were: review articles, studies reporting confused data or with probable errors, studies without any information on the country and studies which were not able to fully access. An attempt was made to contact the corresponding authors using the email address or phone number as provided in the published articles.

Study selection and extraction

Retrieved articles were exported to the reference manager software, Mendeley Desktop, and this was used to remove duplicate studies. Two independent reviewers screened the title and abstract. Any disagreement was handled based on established article selection criteria. Data were extracted using a standardized data extraction format prepared in Microsoft Excel by two independent reviewers. Any discrepancy during extraction was solved through discussion. The name of the first author, study area and region, the study year, study design, year of publication, study population, sample size, response rate and level of good knowledge and good practice were collected.

Quality assessment

Three independent authors appraised the quality of the studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality appraisal checklist was used [17]. When there was disagreement, all authors discussed and resolved the issue. The critical appraisal checklist had 8 parameters with options of “yes, no, unclear and not applicable.” The quality parameters included the following questions: (1) Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?, (2) Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?, (3) Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?, (4) Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?, (5) Were confounding factors identified?, (6) Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?, (7) Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?, and (8) Was an appropriate statistical analysis used?. Studies were considered low risk if there was a score of 50% and above of the quality assessment indicators.

Statistical analysis

The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel and analyzed by using STATA version 14 statistical software (stataCorp LP, 4905 Lakeway Drive, College Station, TX 77845, USA). Publication bias was checked by funnel plot and more objectively through Begg and Egger’s regression tests, with P < 0.05 considered to indicate potential publication bias [18, 19]. The presence of significant between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q statistic. I2 was used to quantify between-study heterogeneity, in which a value of 0, 25, 50, and 75% indicated no, low, medium, and increased heterogeneity, respectively [20]. A forest plot was used to visualize the presence of heterogeneity. Since we found a high level of heterogeneity, we used a random-effect model for analysis to estimate Der Simonian and Laird’s pooled effect. Subgroup analysis was done by stud region. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was employed to see the effect of a single study on the overall meta-analysis estimate. The results were presented in the form of text, tables and figures.

Result

Search outcomes

There were 909 articles retrieved using the electronic search. Of these articles, 606 were excluded due to duplication and 17 articles were fully accessed and assessed for qualification. Eventually, 10 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic presentation of study selection for systematic review and meta-analysis of KP towards sunshine exposure of their children among mothers in Ethiopia

Full size image

Characteristics of included studies

Eight articles which assessed knowledge, 9 articles which assessed practice. All of those which fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies had a low risk during the quality assessment. Five studies were conducted in the Amhara region [10, 21,22,23,24], two in Sidama region [25, 26], one in Oromia [27] and one in Addis Ababa [28]. The other article on KP of mothers on sunshine exposure was nationwide study [29]. The earliest study was conducted by Tesfaye Getaneh in 1995 at Jimma town, Oromia region [27]. The recent study was from Addis Ababa which was conducted in 2020 [28]. Regarding the study design, all studies employed a prospective cross-sectional study design. The sample size ranges from 105 to 660, and the response rate ranged from 84.3 to 100%. The highest level of good knowledge (76%) was recorded in a study from Oromia region and the lowest (40%) was recorded in a study conducted in Amhara region. There was a high level of good practice recorded in a study done in Oromia region which was 80.1% (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis on level of knowledge and practice of mothers towards sunshine exposure of their children in Ethiopia
Full size table

Publication bias

Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and the Egger and Begg regression test at P < 0.05. There was statistical evidence of publication bias for a good level of knowledge. A funnel plot showed some asymmetrical distribution, the Begg and Egger tests were statistically significant with P-values = 0.621 and = 0.201 respectively (Fig. 2). There was no statistical evidence of publication bias for good practice. The Begg and Egger tests were not statistically significant with P-values = 0.405 and = 0.21 respectively (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Funnel plots for publication bias of good level of knowledge towards sunshine exposure of their children among mothers in Ethiopia

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Funnel plots for publication bias of level of good practice towards sunshine exposure of their children among mothers in Ethiopia

Full size image

Level of knowledge and practice towards sunshine exposure

The estimated overall level of good knowledge and good practice in Ethiopia is presented in a forest plot (Figs. 4 and 5). Using the random-effect model, an overall good level of knowledge was found in 56.08% (95% CI: 46.26 - 65.89%; I2 = 96.8%). The pooled estimated level of good practice towards sunshine exposure of their children among mothers in Ethiopia was found in 55.632% (95%CI: 44.091 - 67.174%; I2 = 98.2%).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot for the pooled level of good knowledge towards sunshine exposure of their children among mothers in Ethiopia

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot for the pooled level of good practice towards sunshine exposure of their children among mothers in Ethiopia

Full size image

A leave-out-one sensitivity analysis

A leave-out-one sensitivity analysis was done to evaluate the effect of each study on the pooled level of good knowledge attitude and good practice by excluding each study step-by-step. The results showed that the excluded study did not bring any significant change to the estimated level of good knowledge and good practice respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 A-leave-out -one sensitivity analysis for mothers’ knowledge and practice towards sunshine exposure of their children in Ethiopia
Full size table

Subgroup analysis

The subgroup analysis based on the study region showed that the level of good knowledge was found in 54.12%(95%CI: 41.9–66.37%; I2 = 95.2%) in Amhara region and 56.37% (95% CI: 43.25–69.49%; I2 = 87.7%) in Sidama region. The pooled level of good practice in Amhara and Sidama regions found to be 54.41% (95%CI: 46.866%-53.61.941%; I2 = 34.1%) and 58.32%(95% CI: 53.92–62.71%; I2 = 0.0%) respectively.

Factors associated with knowledge and practice of mothers towards sunshine exposure of their children in Ethiopia

We found insufficient data on factors affecting of knowledge and practice of mothers towards sunshine exposure to conduct meta-analyses and those who assessed the determinant factors (three primary studies) had nonhomogeneous classification (grouping) of the exposures with respect to the outcome variable (KP of sunlight exposure).

A study in Debre Markos, Amhara region revealed that mothers’ knowledge of sunlight exposure correlates with their age, educational status, family size and partner’s occupation. This study revealed that mothers in the age groups 27–32 and 33+ years were nearly five and four times more knowledgeable about sunlight exposure compared to mothers aged 15–20 years respectively. Similarly mothers whose family sized 4–6 were more knowledgeable compared to those family sized 1–3. Furthermore, the study showed that mothers who have degree and above were almost three times more knowledgeable about sunlight exposure of their child compared to those who were classified as able to read and write only [21].

Another conducted in Debre Tabor town, Amhara region indicated that mothers age less than 35 years were 1.4 times less knowledgeable about sunlight exposure compared to those mother aged 35–49 years. The study also found that singled marital status mothers were nearly three times less knowledgeable about sunlight exposure compared to those married mothers [24].

A study in Addis Abeba showed more than half (58.3%) of mothers had fear to expose their neonates to sunlight especially fear of sickness. This study also revealed neonatal age, family composition, home type, prenatal follow up, mother’s knowledge on sunlight exposure of their baby and mothers afraid of exposing their children to sunlight were the possible associated factors of sunlight exposure practice [28].

Moreover, educational status(both maternal and paternal), marital status and occupation were the important predictors of sunlight exposure practice as revealed by a study conducted in Debre Tabor town, Amhara region [24].

Discussion

Ethiopia is a country with 13 months of sunshine and using this opportunity exposing children for morning sunshine especially during early childhood period is crucial to reduce morbidity and mortality due to vitamin-D deficiency and rickets related clinical problems [30].

Because of the limited available literature, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to understand better about the mothers’ level of KP towards sunshine exposure of their children in Ethiopia. We included all available studies conducted in Ethiopia using a variety of different search engines and were also able to undertake a sub-group analysis assessing the pattern of mothers’ knowledge and practice towards sunshine exposure by geographical distribution in two regions in which more than one study available.

This study showed the highest level of good knowledge on sunshine exposure noted from Amhara region and surprisingly in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa more than half of mothers hadn’t good knowledge about sunshine exposure. Though the reason why more than half of mothers hadn’t good knowledge in Addis Ababa (a city with urbanization and a large educated population) was mysterious for us, this might be due to difference in lifestyle, social composition and secio-demographic background [31].

The study showed a generally good knowledge amongst mothers varying from about 46–65% with a pooled average of nearly 56%. This finding wasn’t consistent with a previous primary study conducted in New Zealand and United Kindom (UK) where the study participants in New Zealand and UK had good knowledge compared to our finding [32, 33]. The difference in finding among the studies is an indicative of knowledge gap on sunlight exposure here in Ethiopia compared to the developed world. The finding of our study revealed that significant number of mothers hadn’t good knowledge about sunshine exposure of their children. This might be associated with quality of antenatal car (ANC) service. Studies showed quality of antenatal care service in Ethiopia was low which needs further medication on the giving clue about essential new newborn care including importance of sunshine exposure [31, 34,35,36]. Moreover, multi-prong strategies are required to appraise maternal knowledge about early childhood sunlight exposure.

The pooled level of good practice for sunshine exposure of their children among mothers showed that only nearly half (55%) of mothers had good practice. This might associated with negligence of providing health education about benefits, when and how to expose for sunshine. The other might be, because we do not pay attention to the things that are not payable but are very important. Furthermore, in the most Ethiopian mothers there is a traditional belief that putting the children naked in outdoor are risk for evil eye (Amharic; Buda) and which may have contributed for this finding. The subgroup analysis result showed that there was a notable consistent between regions regarding level of knowledge and practice sunlight exposure of their children.

In this study we found that, maternal age was the determinant factor of mothers’ knowledge about sunlight exposure. Two articles [21, 24] reported that, older mothers have better knowledge of sunlight light exposure of their children compared to the younger one. A good level of knowledge about childhood sunlight exposure among advanced age mothers might be attributed to their own prior experiences of childbirth. These experiences might help mothers to be aware of important information, whereby sunlight is a cost free and relatively risk-free option but is very important to prevent vitamin D deficiency related complications [37]. Therefore, health education during antenatal, natal and postnatal period for younger mothers who lacks experience of child birth could enhance knowledge about sunlight exposure.

Maternal educational level was the other determinant factor of mother’s knowledge about sunlight exposure of their children. Mothers who were educated were knowledgeable about sunning their child compared to those those uneducated [21]. This finding supported by previous studies conducted on related clinical problems in Ethiopia [38, 39]. This might be attributed to health information exposure among educated women that could be obtained from school. Furthermore, educated mothers might have less difficulty of understanding the information received from healthcare workers as compared to their uneducated counterparts [40]. Furthermore, educated mothers can seek, read and understand health messages from communication channels, such as government and other social Medias.

This study also found that educational status (both maternal and paternal), age, marital status and occupation have a significant association with maternal sunning practice. This finding wasn’t supported by a primary study conducted in Turkey in which there was no significant correlation between mothers’ sunning behavior and age, education level [41]. This difference might be clarified due to differences in type, educational status, and level of awareness about sunlight exposure among study populations. Indeed, methodological difference between studies might have a considerable significance for the observed difference.

In our study, the variation between studies resulted in a significant between-study heterogeneity. To assess this further, we used a random-effect model as well as a leave one-out-one sensitivity analysis. The results showed that the estimated pooled level of good knowledge and good practice was robust and not dependent on a single study. We assessed the possible source variability by sub-group analysis using study region. The high heterogeneity might be due to differences in the sample population between studies and the short study period.

Moreover, our finding will have health policy and clinical implications for maternal and child health care services in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian public health policies must address the need for childhood sunlight exposure and this national public health messages should be spread using various platforms (i.e., social media, health institutions, universities, schools) to increase awareness among all sub-groups of the population since protecting children from preventable clinical problems by practicing such essential care should be a matter of everyone. We also call for national healthcare authorities of Ethiopia and other host counties to give an emphasis for policies and programs targeting community health education and appropriate information dissemination about child care including sunlight exposure in various circumstances, such as during perinatal care, immunization, integrated management of newborn and childhood illness service.

Strength and limitation of the study

The strengths of the study included the comprehensive search strategy through the different datasets to estimate the national level of mothers’ knowledge and practice towards sunshine exposure of their children, the involvement of more than one assessor in the quality evaluation and the use of the appraisal process using JBI-MAStARI. Our study also had some limitations. These included the fact that measurements for the level of knowledge and practice were taken from each primary study and operational definitions may have differed between the studies. The absence of a previous similar study makes it difficult to compare our findings with other findings. In addition, this meta-analysis didn’t pool the determinant factors that affect KP of mother’s sunshine exposure of their children. Finally, our search strategy found limited studies and this calls into question the national representativeness of our study.

Conclusion

Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that there was a quite gap in maternal knowledge and practice towards sunshine exposure of their children in Ethiopia. This is important information and requires that stakeholders should give attention about working on it using various platforms (i.e., social media, health institutions, universities, schools) to increase awareness among all sub-groups of the population. Further research is required to determine the mothers’ level of KP on sunshine exposure in other regions of the country and more information about why this gap exists.

Availability of data and materials

All data about this study are contained and presented in this document.

Abbreviations

ANC:

Antenatal Care

CI:

Confidence Interval

DARE:

Database of Abstracts of Review of Effects

EMBASE:

Excerpta Medica database

KP:

Knowledge and Practice

JBI:

The Joanna Briggs Institute

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

SNNP:

South Nations Nationalities and Peoples Region

UK:

United Kingdom

References

  1. Pizzorno JE, Murray MT, Joiner-Bey H. The Clinician's handbook of natural medicine E-book.St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

  2. Gusain P, Paliwal R, Joga R, Gupta N, Singh V. Ancient light therapies: a boon to medical science. Sci Cult. 2016;82:7–8.

  3. Holick MF. Shining light on the Vitamin D-Cancer Connection IARC Report: Cancer connection IARC report. Dermato Endocrinol. 2009;1(1):4–6.

  4. Nair R, Maseeh A. Vitamin D: the “sunshine” vitamin. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2012;3(2):118.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Holick MF. Vitamin D: a millenium perspective. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(2):296–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Milkias P. Ethiopia. Santa Barbara: Abc-Clio; 2011.

  7. Wakayo T, Belachew T, Vatanparast H, Whiting SJ. Vitamin D deficiency and its predictors in a country with thirteen months of sunshine: the case of school children in Central Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Creo AL, Thacher TD, Pettifor JM, Strand MA, Fischer PR. Nutritional rickets around the world: an update. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2017;37(2):84–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rooze S, Dramaix-Wilmet M, Mathieu F, Bally P, Yangzom D, Li JZ, et al. Growth, nutritional status, and signs of rickets in 0–5-year-old children in a Kashin–Beck disease endemic area of Central Tibet. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171(8):1185–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gedamu H, Tafere Y. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice of sunlight exposure of infants among mothers attending in governmental health facilities in Farta district, South Gondar zone, North West Ethiopia, 2018. Int J Reprod Med. 2019;2019 Article 2638190:7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2638190.

  11. Kenenisa C, Ewnetu H, Sime H. Retrospective analysis of prevalence of rickets and associated factors among children admitted to pediatric ward in Jimma University specialized hospital. J Pediatr Neonatal Care. 2014;1(7):00044.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wondale Y, Shiferaw F, Lulseged S. A systematic review of nutritional rickets in Ethiopia: status and prospects. Ethiop Med J. 2005;43(3):203–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kheiri B, Abdalla A, Osman M, Ahmed S, Hassan M, Bachuwa G. Vitamin D deficiency and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a narrative review. Clin Hypertens. 2018;24(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lulseged S, Deste C. Behavioural intention and factors influencing intention of Ethiopian mothers to expose infants to sunshine. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2002;16(1):31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. Nutritional rickets: a review of disease burden, causes, diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329859/9789241516587-eng.pdf.

  16. PRISMA. PRISMA transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. 2011. http://www.prismastatement.org/documents/PRISMA-P. Accessed 1 Feb 2021.

  17. Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical appraisal tools. Australia: The University of Adelaide; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34 pmid:9310563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic review in health care; Meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ publishing group; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins J, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res synthesis. Methods. 2010;1(2):97–111 pmid:26061376.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Murugan R, Abate A. Assessment of knowledge and factors affecting sunlight exposure of infants among mothers attending governmental health facilities in Debre Markos town, Ethiopia. Int J Sci Res. 2016;5(3):1476–81. https://doi.org/10.21275/v5i3.nov162161.

  22. Zeneb W. Assessment of practice and factors associated with sun light exposure of infants among mothers in debrebirhan town, North Shewa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abate A, Murugan R, Gualu T. Assessment of practice and factors affecting sunlight exposure of infants among mothers attending governmental health facilities in Debre Markos town, east Gojjam, Ethiopia, 2015. Am J Nurs Sci. 2016;5(1):30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feleke DG, Mesfin E, Mekete G. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice of mothers on the effects of sunlight exposure and its associated factors among infants found in Debre Tabor town, North Central Ethiopia; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bedaso A, Gebrie M, Deribe B, Ayalew M, Duko B. Knowledge and practice on adequate sunlight exposure of infants among mothers attending EPI unit of Aleta Wondo health center, SNNPR, Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tezera F, Whiting SJ, Gebremedhin S. Dietary calcium intake and sunlight exposure among children aged 6-23 months in dale woreda, southern Ethiopia. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 2017;17(3):12427–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tesfaye G, Afework A, Zerihun T. Rickets and the knowledge and practice of exposure to sunlight in Jimma town. Ethiop J Health Dev. 1998;12(1):29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Godie Y. Assessment of neonatal sunlight exposure and factors affecting it among mother’s attending governmental hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sisay K, Mesfin F, Gobena T, Gebremichael B. Rickets and its associated factors among under-five children in selected public Hospitals in eastern Ethiopia. East Afr J Health Biomed Sci. 2019;3(2):23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Häussinger D. Asella, Life at the Edge of the Great Rift Valley. In: The Hirsch Institute of Tropical Medicine: Düsseldorf University Press; 2019. p. 17–31.

  31. Defar A, Getachew T, Taye G, Tadele T, Getnet M, Shumet T, et al. Quality antenatal care services delivery at health facilities of Ethiopia, assessment of the structure/input of care setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Franklin M. Knowledge and attitude of vitamin D and sun exposure practices amongst New Zealand mothers with children aged five years and under: a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Nutrition and Dietetics, Massey University, Albany, New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation, Massey University).

  33. O’Connor C, Glatt D, White L, Revuelta IR. Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards vitamin D in a UK adult population: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):2387.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tadesse Berehe T, Modibia LM. Assessment of quality of antenatal care services and its determinant factors in public health facilities of Hossana town, Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Longitudinal Study. Advances in Public Health; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Ejigu T, Woldie M, Kifle Y. Quality of antenatal care services at public health facilities of Bahir-Dar special zone, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Haile D, Habte A, Bogale B. Determinants of frequency and content of antenatal Care in Postnatal Mothers in Arba Minch Zuria District, SNNPR, Ethiopia, 2019. Int J Women's Health. 2020;12:953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alshahrani FM, Almalki MH, Aljohani N, Alzahrani A, Alsaleh Y, Holick MF. Vitamin D: light side and best time of sunshine in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013;5(1):177–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Alamneh Y, Adane F, Yirga T, Desta M. Essential newborn care utilization and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Demis A, Gedefaw G, Wondmieneh A, Getie A, Alemnew B. Women’s knowledge towards neonatal danger signs and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Güneş PM. The role of maternal education in child health: evidence from a compulsory schooling law. Econ Educ Rev. 2015;47:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cinar ND, Filiz TM, Topsever P, Ucar F, Akgul S, Gorpelioglu S. Intentional sun exposure in infancy in Sakarya, Turkey. Saudi Med J. 2006;27(8):1222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the authors of the primary studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Funding

There no financial support from any organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia

    Eyasu Alem Lake, Birhanu Wondimeneh Demissie, Robera Olana Fite, Lielt Gebreselassie Gebrekirstos, Tesfaye Yitna Chichiabellu & Mistire Teshome Guta

  2. School of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia

    Natneal Atnafu Gebeyehu, Gedion Asnake Azeze & Kelemu Abebe Gelaw

Authors
  1. Eyasu Alem Lake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Birhanu Wondimeneh Demissie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natneal Atnafu Gebeyehu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gedion Asnake Azeze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kelemu Abebe Gelaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Robera Olana Fite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lielt Gebreselassie Gebrekirstos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tesfaye Yitna Chichiabellu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mistire Teshome Guta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EAL conceptualized this systematic review and meta-analysis, searched articles and screened based on the eligibility criteria. He did the statistical analysis of this manuscript. BWD, NAG, GAA and KAG participated in data extraction and screening. ROF, LGG,TYC and MTG contributed in statistical analysis and writing-up of the manuscript draft. EAL finalized the manuscript and communicated with the journal. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyasu Alem Lake.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lake, E.A., Demissie, B.W., Gebeyehu, N.A. et al. Knowledge and practice of mothers towards sunshine exposure of their children in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 22, 213 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03281-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03281-7

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us