Skip to main content
Download PDF

Knowledge, attitude and practice of Lebanese parents towards childhood overweight/obesity: the role of parent-physician communication

BMC Pediatrics volume 22, Article number: 209 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Childhood overweight and obesity is one of the most challenging public health problems facing both developed and developing countries. Several studies carried worldwide assessed predisposing risk factors for childhood obesity, however, few addressed the Middle East region and particularly Lebanon. We aimed in our study to assess factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice of Lebanese parents regarding childhood overweight, particularly the parent-physician communication.

Methods

This cross-sectional study conducted between September and December 2019. The questionnaire used was the standardized questionnaire of “Parent Questionnaire Curriculum” from the “We Can program” (Ways to Enhance Children’s Activity and Nutrition).

Results

A higher parent-physician communication score (Beta = 0.05) was significantly associated with higher knowledge, whereas having a higher intermediate vs low income (Beta = -0.65) was significantly associated with lower knowledge. A higher knowledge global score (Beta = 1.25), a higher parent-physician communication score (Beta = 0.18), and having a university education level compared to illiterate/primary/complementary (Beta = 2.59) were significantly associated with better attitude. A better attitude (Beta = 0.92) and a higher global knowledge score (Beta = 0.6) were significantly associated with a better practice.

Conclusion

This study found that a better parent-physician communication and higher knowledge were associated with better attitude and practice towards obesity. Given the rise in childhood obesity worldwide, identifying factors that help reduce childhood obesity, is becoming mandatory. Our results can open up to future studies addressing strategies to prevent childhood obesity in Lebanon.

Peer Review reports

Background

Childhood overweight is a serious problem that places children and adolescents at risk of poor physical and psychological health. It is defined as a body mass index between the 85th and the 95th percentile of growth curves charts [1]. Childhood overweight/obesity is one of the biggest challenges in the twenty-first century because of its rapid increase worldwide [2]. A study conducted in 2010 showed that globally, the number of overweight children was estimated to be over 35 million in developing countries and 42 million in developed countries [3]. In terms of childhood overweight, the Middle East is the third most affected region after the USA and Europe. A study conducted in 2014, showed that 38.4% of Lebanese children aged between 6 and 19 years are overweight and 13.2% are obese [4], higher than the worldwide prevalence estimated at 9.1% in 2020 [5].

Children’s overweight results from an interaction between genetic, environmental, behavioral, and social factors. Lebanese children are at risk of consuming large amounts of unhealthy foods, while spending three or more hours a day in front of the screen [6, 7]. In addition, they are largely exposed to food advertisements in which 80% of the products presented do not meet nutritional standards recommended by the World Health Organization due to inefficient media regulation [4].

Parental behaviors have been previously described as a factor influencing childhood obesity affecting directly or indirectly the knowledge and attitude of the society [8]. The majority of parents of overweight children are unaware of their children’s weight and the potential risks of this condition on their health [9]. On another hand, parents who perceive their children as overweight are more likely to encourage their children to be more physically active and restrict unhealthy food intake [10]. In addition, parent-focused interventions have shown good consequences in reducing child overweight in comparison to child-focused ones [11]. Furthermore, the parental level of education was shown to be a major contributing factor to children’s overweight, however, it played a controversial role in children obesity; higher parental education was associated with lower [12] vs higher levels of childhood obesity [13, 14]. The association between socioeconomic status and childhood obesity is also controversial; in high-income countries, childhood obesity was reported to be higher in families of low socioeconomic class, while in low-income countries, obesity was lower in families with a low socioeconomic class [14, 15].

Overweight children were shown to be at higher risk for developing non-communicable diseases (diabetes and cardiovascular disorders) related to obesity in adulthood [16]. Overweight can also have a negative impact on children’s psychological health [16]. Overweight children had lower self-esteem, poor academic performance and a low quality of life [17]. Hence, prevention of childhood overweight seems essential. Consequently, implementing preventive strategies should be based on conscientious investigations of childhood obesity determinants and predisposing risk factors.

Several studies carried worldwide assessed predisposing risk factors for childhood obesity, however few addressed the Middle East region, particularly Lebanon [18]. None addressed parental knowledge, attitude and parent-physician communication towards childhood obesity. We aimed in our study to assess factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice of Lebanese parents regarding childhood overweight/obesity, particularly the parent-physician communication.

Methods

Study design

This cross-sectional study was conducted between September and December 2019 and enrolled participants from community pharmacies from all Lebanese districts (Beirut, Bekaa, Mount Lebanon, South Lebanon and North Lebanon). Pharmacies were chosen conveniently from each governorate. All adults entering the pharmacy were approached; those who were Lebanese and a parent of a child between two and eleven years were eligible for study enrollment. Parents with more than one child in this age range had to fill one survey for each child. Parents were free to accept or refuse to participate, with no financial compensation offered for participants. Participants who met the inclusion criteria were briefed about the topic, and the different aspects of the questionnaire before filling it, while being assured of the anonymity of the response, by one of the collaborators of this research project.

Minimal sample size

The Epi-info software estimated the minimal sample size needed at 384, based on a 5% error and a 50% percentage of good knowledge of parents about obesity (the 50% value was chosen since it will yield the highest sample size in the absence of similar studies in the country). A total of 393 (78.6%) questionnaires out of 500 distributed was collected back and analyzed.

Translation procedure

Two certified translators performed the forward and back translation (from English to Arabic then to English). The principal investigator verified this translation and matched the two English versions to detect inconsistencies and solve discrepancies. Minor corrections were done and solved by consensus between all involved parties.

Questionnaire

The questionnaire was composed of five sections: the first one collects socio-demographic information (age, gender, education level and household monthly income). The following three sections gathered information regarding knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) about alimentation, physical activity, and time spent in front of screens. The last one collected information regarding the level of parent-physician communication. The scale used was composed of 15 items, scored on a four-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a better parent-physician communication [19].

Knowledge, attitudes and practice global scores have been calculated separately. Concerning knowledge questions, a score of 1 was assigned for every right answer, and 0 for a wrong answer or a non-response. The total knowledge score was out of 20.

We have used a Likert scale with 1 to 5 scores (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) for attitude and practice propositions. The attitude and practice global scores were out 95 and 135 respectively. The three scores were divided later on into low, intermediate and high scores using the visual binning option in SPSS.

The questionnaire used in our study was the standardized questionnaire of “Parent Questionnaire Curriculum” from the “We Can program” (Ways to Enhance Children’s Activity and Nutrition) [20, 21], which is an updated version of Birsch and al (2004) “Child Feeding Questionnaire”. “We Can” is a youth obesity-prevention initiative providing activities and programs, with the aim of improving nutritional choices, increasing physical activity and reducing screen time in youth. It was prepared for the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Institutes of Health and is composed of four programs. One of them is Energize our Families: Curriculum for Parents and Caregivers, for the education of parents. The Parent Questionnaire Curriculum evaluates the level of KAP about nutrition, physical activity and screening time of children’s parents, before and after an educative intervention.

We also added the following questions about restriction, affective feeding, pressure to eat food and parents’ model, extracted from the Child Feeding Questionnaire de Birsh and al [22]: “I intentionally keep some food out of my child’s read”, “I offer sweets (candy, ice-cream, cake or pastries) as a reward for good behavior”, “My child should always eat all of the food on her plate”, “I have to be especially careful to make sure my child eats enough”, “If my child says I’m not hungry, I try to get him to eat anyway”. Questions were scored on a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree).

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software v.25. Missing data represented less than 10% of the total database and therefore was not replaced. The knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were normally distributed, as verified by a skewness and kurtosis values between -2 and + 2 [23]. These assumptions were consolidated by the sample size exceeding 300 [24]. The Student t and ANOVA tests were used to compare two and three or more means. Pearson test was used to correlate two continuous variables. Three linear regressions were conducted taking the knowledge, attitude, and practice scores as dependent variables respectively. Variables that showed a p < 0.2 in the bivariate analysis were considered as independent ones to minimize the risk for confounding variables effect [25]. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The reliability analysis of the scales used in this study were very good: knowledge global scale (α = 0.7), attitude (α = 0.834), practice (α = 0.846) and parent-physician communication (α = 0.946). The sociodemographic characteristics of the parents are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of the parents was 33.50 ± 7.17 (89% females).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (N = 393)
Full size table

Description of the different knowledge, attitude and practice scores

The description of the knowledge, attitude and practice global scores are summarized in Table 2. When using the visual binning option to divide the scores into three categories, the results showed that 170 (43.3%) of the participants had low knowledge (scores ≤ 13), whereas 113 (28.8%) and 110 (28.0%) had moderate (scores between 14 and 15) and good (scores ≥ 16) knowledge respectively. Moreover, 134 (34.1%) of the participants had poor attitude (scores ≤ 69), whereas 128 (32.6%) and 131 (33.3%) had moderate (scores between 70 and 76) and good (scores ≥ 77) attitude respectively. Finally, 138 (35.1%) of the participants had poor practice (scores ≤ 86), whereas 140 (35.6%) and 115 (29.3%) had moderate (scores between 87 and 98) and good (scores ≥ 99) practice respectively.

Table 2 Description of the different knowledge, attitude and practice scores
Full size table

Bivariate analysis of factors associated with the knowledge, attitude and practice scores

Higher mean knowledge, attitude and practice global scores were found in those with a university level of education compared to the other categories, in those living in Mount Lebanon compared to the other governorates and in those with a high household monthly income compared to the other categories (Supplementary Table 1).

Higher global knowledge score was significantly associated with higher global attitude and practice scores, as well as a better parent-physician communication score. Moreover, a better global attitude score was significantly associated with better practice and parent-physician communication scores, whereas a higher practice score was significantly associated with better parent-physician communication score (Supplementary Table 2). More details about the correlations between the subscales scores can be found in Supplementary Table 3.

Multivariable analysis

The results of a first linear regression, taking the global knowledge score as the dependent variable and the sociodemographic characteristics and the parent-physician communication score as independent variables, showed that a higher patient-communication score (Beta = 0.05) and living in Mount Lebanon vs Beirut (Beta = 1.04) were significantly associated with higher knowledge, whereas having a higher intermediate vs low income (Beta = -0.65) was significantly associated with lower knowledge (Table 3, Model 1).

Table 3 Multivariable analysis
Full size table

A second linear regression, taking the global attitude score as the dependent variable, showed that a higher knowledge global score (Beta = 1.25), a higher patient-communication score (Beta = 0.18), and having a university education level compared to illiterate/primary/complementary (Beta = 2.59) were significantly associated with better attitude (Table 3, Model 2).

A third linear regression, taking the global practice score as the dependent variable, showed that better attitude (Beta = 0.92), a higher global knowledge score (Beta = 0.6), living in Mount Lebanon (Beta = 4.50) and Bekaa (Beta = 2.29) compared to Beirut were significantly associated with a better practice (Table 3, Model 3).

Discussion

We found in our study that a higher parent-physician communication was associated with better knowledge, and attitude toward childhood obesity. In addition, better knowledge and attitude were associated with better practice. Those results are in line with previous findings [26] showing that an improvement in the parent-physician communication can result in a better weight management in children. Nowadays, the relationship between doctors and parents have shifted to be based on communication that leads to a shared decision-making [27, 28]. Consequently, patient-care provider communication can lead to a better knowledge and a higher adherence to treatment recommendation, with better medical outcomes [29]. Furthermore, better health outcome and compliance to obesity treatment were reported when the pediatric patient is implicated in the communication [26]. When addressing childhood obesity, fewer than 25% of parents of obese children have been previously informed that their child was overweight [30, 31]. In fact, a study conducted on obese Latin children showed that there was a lack of direct communication of predisposing factors for obesity [31]. The American academy of pediatrics recommended the implementation of communication strategies for information and obesity plan reduction, given that better communication will lead to better knowledge and attitude, and consequently better global practice [32]. As better knowledge and attitude were linked to better practice in our study, we can probably say that the lack of knowledge about childhood obesity can be partially responsible for the increasing numbers of childhood overweight. Those results were different from those found in a study conducted in Malaysia where better knowledge was not associated with better attitude and practice [33].

Parental education was associated with better attitude in our study. Those results were similar to previous findings showing that higher parental education level was associated with lower childhood overweight [34], attributed to the better attitude toward childhood overweight prevention. Highly educated parents are aware of the benefit of breastfeeding, for example, in preventing childhood obesity and overweight and tend to breastfeed their infants [35]. In addition, highly educated parents are more aware of the healthy lifestyle, acquire better dieting skills during their education and can, consequently, implement those dietary habits in their family in a better way [36]. Finally, the difference in social norms between high and low educated parents can explain the difference between attitude toward childhood obesity and overweight preventions [34]. However it is important to mention that previous studies, including one study conducted in Lebanon, showed that higher maternal education was associated with higher childhood overweight and obesity [14, 37]. This was explained by the fact that the increasing number of working, high educated mothers in Lebanon led to an increase in appointing paid helpers at home. Consequently, mothers tend to pay less attention to their children’s behaviors and could be responsible for an increase in overweight/obesity by two folds [14].

Finally, we found in our study that parental knowledge was lower in parents with intermediate monthly income in comparison with those with a low income. Parental nutritional knowledge was found to be an important contributor for childhood obesity [38]since it influences parental food shopping and preparation and food delivery to their children. Previous studies [34, 39, 40] have showed, in opposition to what we found in our study, that parents with lower income were associated with lower knowledge about obesity because they tend to have a worse understanding of nutritional habits and knowledge [38, 41]. However, this association is not valid in Lebanon given the economic crises Lebanese people are facing.

Clinical implications

Our results should encourage Lebanese pediatricians and healthcare workers to enhance the parent-physician communication. In addition, this study can raise awareness on the importance of increasing knowledge toward obesity among parents and children, in order to get better attitude and practice. The role of awareness campaigns in schools for health promotion that educates about child’s wellbeing, including healthy eating and physical activity, is a key factor for the success in the fight against childhood overweight and obesity.

Limitations

This study is a cross-sectional study that did not take into account different behaviors over a period of time; the results were collected through a self-administered questionnaire, thus, subject to an information bias. A selection bias is present since parents were recruited from community pharmacies and because of the refusal rate for participation. A residual confounding bias is also possible since not all factors associated with KAP are considered in this paper. The questionnaire used was not adapted to the Lebanese population. The cutoff points used for the scales were arbitrary. No standardization was made for the Lebanese population. In addition, the number of male participants was very low compared to females, and the representation of the different Lebanese governorates was not homogenous; thus, the generalizability of the results and their extrapolation to the wider community may need more studies to support our results.

Conclusion

Children worldwide, and particularly Lebanese children, are at a high risk for childhood obesity. Consequently, raising awareness about predisposing and protective risk factors, seems mandatory. This study highlighted the importance of educating parents, and improving parent-physician communication in achieving better knowledge, attitude and practice towards obesity. Those results may serve as a first step for the implementation of educational programs and strategies to reduce childhood obesity.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are not publicly available to maintain the privacy of the individuals’ identities. The dataset supporting the conclusions is available upon request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

KAP:

Knowledge, attitude and practice

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

References

  1. Overweight & Obesity. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/defining.html (Accessed 7 Feb 2021).

  2. Sahoo K, Sahoo B, Choudhury AK, Sofi NY, Kumar R, Bhadoria AS. Childhood obesity: causes and consequences. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(2):187–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Reifsnider E, Mendias E. Early infant feeding influences and weight of children. Croatia: Childhood Obesity InTech Rijeka; 2012. p. 15–52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nasreddine L, Taktouk M, Dabbous M, Melki J. The extent, nature, and nutritional quality of foods advertised to children in Lebanon: the first study to use the WHO nutrient profile model for the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Food Nutr Res. 2019;63. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v63.1604.

  5. Global prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity among preschool children. Available from: http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/publications/overweight_obesity/en/ (Accessed 7 Feb 2021).

  6. Lebanon 2017 Fact Sheet, Global School-based Student Health Survey. Available from: https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/gshs/Lebanon_2017_GSHS_FS.pdf?ua=1

  7. Abi Nader P, Majed L, Sayegh S, Mattar L, Hadla R, Chamieh MC, Habib Mourad C, Fares EJ, Hawa Z, Belanger M. First Physical Activity Report Card for Children and Youth in Lebanon. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16(6):385–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mabiala Babela JR, Nika ER, Nkounkou Milandou KG, Missambou Mandilou SV, Bouangui Bazolana SB, Monabeka HG, Moyen G. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Parents Facing Child and Adolescent Obesity in Brazzaville. Congo Glob Pediatr Health. 2016;3:2333794X16675546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarrafzadegan N, Rabiei K, Nouri F, Mohammadifard N, Moattar F, Roohafza H, Haghjooy Javanmard S, Zarfeshani S, Pourmoghaddas M. Parental perceptions of weight status of their children. ARYA Atheroscler. 2013;9(1):61–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson ME. Parental feeding and childhood obesity in preschool-age children: recent findings from the literature. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2010;33(4):205–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasreddine L, Naja F, Chamieh MC, Adra N, Sibai AM, Hwalla N. Trends in overweight and obesity in Lebanon: evidence from two national cross-sectional surveys (1997 and 2009). BMC Public Health. 2012;12:798.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bilic-Kirin V, Gmajnic R, Burazin J, Milicic V, Buljan V, Ivanko M. Association between socioeconomic status and obesity in children. Coll Antropol. 2014;38(2):553–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muthuri SK, Francis CE, Wachira LJ, Leblanc AG, Sampson M, Onywera VO, Tremblay MS. Evidence of an overweight/obesity transition among school-aged children and youth in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92846.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nasreddine L, Hwalla N, Saliba A, Akl C, Naja F. Prevalence and Correlates of Preschool Overweight and Obesity Amidst the Nutrition Transition: Findings from a National Cross-Sectional Study in Lebanon. Nutrients. 2017;9(3):266.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mirmiran P, Sherafat-Kazemzadeh R, Jalali-Farahani S, Azizi F. Childhood obesity in the Middle East: a review. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(9):1009–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Popkin BM, Doak CM. The obesity epidemic is a worldwide phenomenon. Nutr Rev. 1998;56(4 Pt 1):106–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogden CL, Flegal KM. Changes in terminology for childhood overweight and obesity. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010;25:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Monasta L, Batty GD, Cattaneo A, Lutje V, Ronfani L, Van Lenthe FJ, Brug J. Early-life determinants of overweight and obesity: a review of systematic reviews. Obes Rev. 2010;11(10):695–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sustersic M, Gauchet A, Kernou A, Gibert C, Foote A, Vermorel C, Bosson JL. A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. About We Can! Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/wecan/about-wecan/index.htm

  21. U.S. Department of Agriculture: SNAP-Ed connection. We Can! (Ways to Enhance Children's Activity & Nutrition). Available from: https://snaped.fns.usda.gov/library/materials/we-can-ways-enhance-childrens-activity-nutrition.

  22. Fluegel LE. The Relationship Between Maternal Child Feeding Practices and Child’s BMI and Child’s Dietary Restraint in Mexican-American Families of Grand Rapids, MI. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  23. George D: SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e: Pearson Education India; 2011.

  24. Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):67–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Carcone AI, Jacques-Tiura AJ, Brogan Hartlieb KE, Albrecht T, Martin T. Effective Patient-Provider Communication in Pediatric Obesity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016;63(3):525–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sawyer SM, Aroni RA. Sticky issue of adherence. J Paediatr Child Health. 2003;39(1):2–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ha JF, Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J. 2010;10(1):38–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Glanz JM, Wagner NM, Narwaney KJ, Shoup JA, McClure DL, McCormick EV, Daley MF. A mixed methods study of parental vaccine decision making and parent-provider trust. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(5):481–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Borra ST, Kelly L, Shirreffs MB, Neville K, Geiger CJ. Developing health messages: qualitative studies with children, parents, and teachers help identify communications opportunities for healthful lifestyles and the prevention of obesity. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(6):721–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Turer CB, Montano S, Lin H, Hoang K, Flores G. Pediatricians’ communication about weight with overweight Latino children and their parents. Pediatrics. 2014;134(5):892–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Krebs NF, Jacobson MS. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on N: Prevention of pediatric overweight and obesity. Pediatrics. 2003;112(2):424–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hatta N, Rahman NAA, Rahman NIA, Haque M. Knowledge, attitude and practices among mothers regarding childhood obesity at Kuantan. Malaysia Int Med J. 2017;24(2):200–4.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Huerta M, Bibi H, Haviv J, Scharf S, Gdalevich M. Parental smoking and education as determinants of overweight in Israeli children. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3(2):A48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ward M, Sheridan A, Howell F, Hegarty I, O’Farrell A. Infant feeding: factors affecting initiation, exclusivity and duration. Ir Med J. 2004;97(7):197–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Power C, Parsons T. Nutritional and other influences in childhood as predictors of adult obesity. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000;59(2):267–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Garcia-Conde MG, Marin L, Maya SR, Cuestas PJ. Parental Attitudes to Childhood Overweight: The Multiple Paths through Healthy Eating, Screen Use, and Sleeping Time. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cluss PA, Ewing L, King WC, Reis EC, Dodd JL, Penner B. Nutrition knowledge of low-income parents of obese children. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(2):218–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lamerz A, Kuepper-Nybelen J, Wehle C, Bruning N, Trost-Brinkhues G, Brenner H, Hebebrand J, Herpertz-Dahlmann B. Social class, parental education, and obesity prevalence in a study of six-year-old children in Germany. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005;29(4):373–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wardle J, Volz C, Golding C. Social variation in attitudes to obesity in children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995;19(8):562–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mushonga N, Mujuru H, Nyanga L, Nyagura S, Musaka N, Dembah R. Parental knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding overweight among preschool children in rural Zimbabwe. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 2017;17(4):12775–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all participants and the owners of the pharmacies.

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Helene Barbe Zoghby, Elsa Sfeir and Marwan Akel contributed equally to this manuscript.

  2. Sahar Obeid and Souheil Hallit are last authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France

    Helene Barbe Zoghby

  2. School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, P.O. Box 446, Jounieh, Lebanon

    Elsa Sfeir & Souheil Hallit

  3. School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon

    Marwan Akel & Diana Malaeb

  4. School of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

    Diana Malaeb

  5. Social and Education Sciences Department, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese American University, Jbeil, Lebanon

    Sahar Obeid

  6. Research Department, Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Jal Eddib, Lebanon

    Souheil Hallit

  7. Psychology Department, College of Humanities, Effat University, Jeddah, 21478, Saudi Arabia

    Souheil Hallit

Authors
  1. Helene Barbe Zoghby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elsa Sfeir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marwan Akel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Diana Malaeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sahar Obeid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Souheil Hallit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HBZ, ES and MA wrote the paper; HB and SH designed the study; DM involved in the data collection; SH carried out the analysis and interpreted the results; SO and SH edited the paper and reviewed its intellectual content; all authors read and approved the final manuscript; SH was the project supervisors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Souheil Hallit.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross research and ethics committee approved this study (HPC-014–2019). Written informed consent was obtained from each parent before filling the survey. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: 

Supplementary Table 1. Bivariate analysis of factors associated with the knowledge, attitudeand practice global scores. Supplementary Table 2. Bivariate analysis of continuous variables associated with the knowledge, attitude and practice global scores. Supplementary Table 3. Bivariate analysis of continuous variables associated with the subscales scores.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zoghby, H.B., Sfeir, E., Akel, M. et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Lebanese parents towards childhood overweight/obesity: the role of parent-physician communication. BMC Pediatr 22, 209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03279-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03279-1

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us