Skip to main content
Download PDF

Perinatal, neonatal, developmental and demographic predictors of intelligence at 4 years of age among low birth weight children: a panel study with a 2-year follow-up

BMC Pediatrics volume 22, Article number: 88 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Intoduction

Childhood intelligence is an important predictor of later outcomes in life such as socioeconomic status or health. Hence, a deeper understanding of predictors of child intelligence should suggest points of intervention for children facing adversities.

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to examine the predictive value of demographic, perinatal and neonatal variables after birth and developmental characteristics at age 2 for 4-year intelligence as outcome among low birth weight children.

Methods

We designed a panel study with a 2-year follow-up with 114 child-mother pairs. The outcome variable was IQ intelligence quotient at 4 years of age of LBW low birth weight children measured by the Wechsler Primary and Preschool Scales of Intelligence. Potential predictors were maternal education, family wealth, ethnic identity; sex, twin pregnancy, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, maternal smoking during pregnancy; diagnosis of intravetricular haemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia after birth and cognitive, language and motor development at age 2 measured by one composite score of the three Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development aggregated.

Results

Stepwise backward regression was carried out including significant variables from the bivariate analysis. The best model included 4 predictors which accounted for 57% of the variance of the full IQ intelligence at 4-years of age. Maternal higher education was significant positive, below average family wealth and neonatal diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia were significant negative predictors in the model after birth. 2-year developmental characteristics such as cognitive, motor and language skills were positive predictors of the IQ intelligence at age 4.

Conclusion

Sociodemographic assessment at birth and developmental assessment at two years of age are of crucial importance to recognize children at high risk for delayed cognitive development. High-risk children should be directed to supportive interventions and their development should be regulary monitored.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cognitive skills operacionalized as childhood intelligence quotient (IQ) comprise one of the most important predictors of later outcomes in life such as socioeconomic status or health [1,2,3]. Hence, a deeper understanding of predictors of child intelligence should provide points of prevention for children facing adversities.

A large body of original articles across various types of study populations suggests that parental education, family income, and maternal intelligence are dominant predictors of childhood intelligence. Eriksen et al. (2013) [4] found that parental education, maternal IQ and the child’s gender accounted for 24% of the variance in IQ at 5 years of age [4]. Other studies reported similar results: maternal and paternal education together was considered as a strong predictor (R2 = 0.19) of IQ at age 8 [5], while the sociodemographic status of the family at birth explained almost 10% of the variance in IQ at ages between 7 – 11 [6]. Inaddition to parental demographic factors, postnatal factors such as breastfeeding[7] and physical growth of the child during the first year of life [8] were found to be significantly associated with later IQ [7, 8]. Previous studies of children with low birth weight have found associations between birth weight, low intelligence and attention deficits [9, 10]. These unfavourable outcomes may in part be due to premature gestational age, but other neonatal factors such as chronic diseases and social factors including parental intelligence, parental education, and family wealth may also affect the cognitive outcomes of the child. Early developmental milestones have been identified in several studies as important predictors of adult IQ [11]. The impact of these early developmental characteristics vary across studies which may reflect differences between study samples and investigated predictors. Resolution of many of the complex questions about the later consequences of preterm birth and low birth weight requires prospective follow-up studies investigating potential determinant variables. The present study aims to contribute to this resolution.

The primary purpose of the current study is to examine the predictive value of demographic, perinatal and neonatal variables at childbirth and developmental characteristics at age 2 for 4-year intelligence as the outcome among low birth weight (LBW) children.

Methods

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received permission from the Hungarian Medical Research Council (33176–2/2017/EKU) following the ethical principles of the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all parent(s)/ legal guardians.

Study design and participants

We designed a panel study with a 2-year follow-up. The sampling frame consisted of children born in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Clinical Center of the University of Debrecen in Hungary between June 2014 – August 2016 with birth weight below 2500 g and no visual impairment due to severe retinopathy of prematurity. Neonates born with visual impairment of prematurity were excluded since diagnostic tools used to measure developmental characteristics and IQ are not suitable for children with visual impairment. Mothers of the invited children made the decision to participate by providing written informed consent. Inclusion was further differentiated by birth weight. All children born below 1500 g without the exclusion criterion were invited to participate, whereas children between 1500–2500 g birthweight were selected to produce a subsample that fit the gender distribution of the very low birth weight (< 1500 g) group. Data of these two groups were analysed together in this paper.

Sources of data

Data collection was carried out between September 2016 and January 2020. Perinatal and neonatal data were obtained from the final reports of children in the database of the Neonatology Unit of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Measurement data at 2 and 4 years of age were collected by the first author, a trained psychologist, by individually assessing children under the supervision of the senior author. All assessments took place at the Pediatric Psychology and Psychosomatic Unit of the Department of Pediatrics of the Clinical Center of the University of Debrecen.

Timeline of data collection

Three hundred five mother–child pairs with children 2 years of age were recruited in the first period of study (September 2016—August 2018) when the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition test [12] was administered. Of those, 114 mothers whose children reached 4 years of age agreed to participate in the second study period – between September 2018 and January 2020 – when the Wechsler Primary and Preschool Scales of Intelligence 4th Edition IQ test [13] was administered.

Four hundred and forty-six children and their mothers conforming to the inclusion criteria were asked between September 2016 and August 2018 to participate in the study when the children were 2 years of age. Of those invited, 305 (68.3%) participated in the first study period when the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition test [12] was administered. Of the mother–child pairs assessed in the first study period, 158 children reached 4 years of age between September 2018 and January 2020. All were invited and 114 (72.1%) agreed to participate in the second assessment, when the Wechsler Primary and Preschool Scales of Intelligence 4th Edition IQ test [13] was administered (second study period).

Outcome variable

The outcome variable was defined as the children’s IQ at 4-years of age measured by the Wechsler Primary and Preschool Scales of Intelligence – 4th edition (WPPSI-IV [13]). The validated Hungarian version of WPPSI-IV was used which measures IQ consistently and accurately attested by its reliability (Chronbach α = 0.86–0.95) calculated during the adaptation process [14]. All 5 primary subtests were completed: Verbal Comprehension (VCI), Fluid Reasoning (FRI), Visual-Spatial ability (VSI), Processing Speed (PSI), and Working Memory (WMI) from which the score of the Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) was calculated. FSIQ reflects the performance in distinct cognitive domains and is considered the most representative indicator of global intellectual functioning. The theoretical mean score of all subtest indices and the FSIQ are normalized (mean: 100; standard deviation: 15 [13]).

Predictor variables by domains

  • Demographic variables: Information on maternal education (primary/ secondary/ higher) and subjective family wealth (below average/ average/ above average) were obtained by a questionnaire completed by the mothers at follow-up. Ethnic identity was classified by one external observer (Hungarian/ Roma).

  • Perinatal characteristics: The child’s sex, twin pregnancy (yes/no), gestational age (months), birth weight (grams) and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min (0–10) were obtained from the neonatal final reports retrospectively. The Apgar-score is calculated for newborns at 1 and 5 min after birth based on skin color, heart rate, reflex irritability, muscle tone and respiratory effort ranging between 0–10 where a score of eight or above reflects good health [15]. Information on maternal smoking during pregnancy was assessed by a self-report question and included as binary variable (yes/no) in the statistical analysis.

  • Neonatal variables: Information on any of 3 postnatal illnesses—intravetricular haemorrhage (IVH), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)—was obtained from the neonatal final reports as described elsewhere [16].

  • Developmental characteristics at 2 years: Neurodevelopmental characteristics of the children were measured by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition (BSID-III [12]). The test measures the infants’s abilities by 5 subscales and provides objective information on cognitive, expressive and receptive language as well as fine and gross motor development. Raw scores of each subscale are normalized to a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 3. Raw scores can be transformed into three composite scores (Q values), which are normalized to a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15 and refer to the cognitive, language and motor performance. Composite scores between 85 70 and 70 85 (and raw scores between 4 and 7) with -2 SD to -1SD reflect mild delay, while composite scores below 70 (and raw scores below 4) and more than -2 SD identify children with severe delay [12, 17]. For statistical analysis, an aggregated value was calculated from the mean of the 3 composite scores (∑Cog-Lang-Mot).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out with IBM SPSS Statistics v23 and Stata/IC 16.1. Univariate analysis of variance was used for calculating the power of the sample and probability of type II error. Pearson correlation was used to test bivariate association with all variables. Point biserial correlation was also carried out to account for binary variables (coded as exposed – 1 or non-exposed – 0) that yielded the same results as Pearson. Second, linear regression analysis and stepwise backward regression were conducted with variables of the four predictor domains (demographic, perinatal, neonatal and developmental characteristics) for the outcome variable. Subscales of the BSID-III were tested separately, and also as aggregate measure. Significance level was set at alpha = 0.05. The models were evaluated by explained variance (R2), measure of residuals (root mean square error), and measure of the models’ fit (Akaike’s information criterion). Third, predictors of the best fitting model were identified by stepwise backward regression analysis, setting alpha for the removal of predictors at 0.05.

Patient and public Involvement

The research question addressed patients’ priorities and interests since low birth weight with its consequences has been an important public health issue in Hungary. Hungary had the sixth highest rate of low birth weight among OECD countries in 2018. Participants were involved neither in study design nor in recruitment. Diagnostic tests at two years of age are performed as part of the two-year status examination of premature infants in outpatient care offered to all LBW children. However, IQ assessment at 4 years of age is not part of the routine assessment of LBW children, this was offered only to participants in the study the results of which were fed back to parents of participating children. Results of the children’s assessments at 2 and 4 years of age were discussed with parents. In cases of mild developmental delay, parents were shown developmental exercises to be performed with the child at home. In cases of severe developmental delay, parents were referred to specialist care for further diagnostic tests and intervention. The assessments performed in the study served as important timepoints for psychological and developmental screening of children at risk and their families. Certain results have already been presented to community health workers in touch with families at high risk of LBW birth. Findings will be disseminated to the professional and lay public in the form of conference presentations and health education materials.

Results

Characteristics of the sample

Four hundred and forty-six children and their mothers were invited to participate in the study when the children were 2 years of age. Of those, 305 (68.3%) mother–child pairs agreed to participate in the first study period. Of those, 158 children reached 4 years of age in the second study period, all of whom were invited and 114 (72.1%) agreed to participate. The most common reason for non-participation in the first phase and drop-out in the second phase of the study were relocation to a distant part of the country and not willing to travel back.

Univariate analysis of variance was used for calculating the power of the sample and probability of type II error. The observed power was 96% with p-value < 0.001; Beta value was 3%. Of all children included in the study, 114 participated in both assessments at 2 and also at 4 years of age (50 boys, 44%). The children’s birth weight ranged between 450 and 2480 g (M = 1310.08 ± 545.72 g). The mean gestational age (M = 30.00 ± 3.85 months; 22–37 months) reflected the prematurity of the children. Apgar-scores were low at 1 min (M = 6.97 ± 1.74), however, the 5-min values (M = 8.34 ± 1.02) were significantly improved (p < 0.001). Perinatal, neonatal, developmental and demographic characterestics of the sample are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of the sample by predictor domains and their correlations with IQ at 4 years of age
Full size table

Bivariate correlations

The full-scale IQ (FSIQ) performance at 4 years of age showed significant correlation with all but two predictor variables (sex of child, twin pregnancy) as shown in Table 1. The strongest correlations were found with developmental charachteristics at 2 years of age (cognitive: p < 0.001, finemotor: p < 0.001 and receptive communication skills: p < 0.001) and maternal education (p < 0.001). Significant association of FSIQ was found with maternal smoking during pregnancy (p < 0.001), birth weight (p < 0.001), gestational age (p = 0.001), neonatal diagnosis of BPD (p < 0.001), ROP (p < 0.001) and IVH (p = 0.010), Apgar-scores (at 1 min.: p = 0.014; at 5 min.: p = 0.010), and demographic variables such as ethnicity (p = 0.001) and family wealth (p < 0.001).

Model selection

Full-scale IQ at 4 years of age was found to be normally distributed so it was appropriate for linear regression modeling. Independent variables significantly correlated with the outcome variable were included in the models as predictors. Maternal education and family wealth were transformed into binary variables (maternal education: higher education/below; family wealth: below average/higher). Neonatal morbities such as BPD, ROP and IVH were included in the model as binary varibles (yes/no). A series of regression analysis were conducted in order to find the best model.

First, linear regression was conducted with all 16 predictor variables that showed bivariate correlation with the outcome. The 5 BSID subscales (raw scores) were included separately in this model (Model 1 in Table 2). In this model, only maternal education was predictor for FSIQ. Stepwise backward regression with the same set of variables yielded a slightly stronger model in which five variables (maternal education, family wealth, fine motor, gross motor and receptive communication skills at 2 years of age) remained as significant predictors (Model 2).

Table 2 Linear regression modeling
Full size table

Next, linear regression (Model 3) and stepwise backward regression (Model 4) were carried out with the same variables as in Model 1 and 3 except for the Bayley subscales which were included as one aggregate measure calculated as described in methods. As Table 2 shows, the use of the aggregate BSID score resulted in better models than including the subscales separately. Model 3 identified maternal education and the 2-year developmental score as significant predictors of intelligence at 4 years of age. Model 4 was identified as the best model based on the highest proportion of explained variance, lowest measure of residuals (RMSE), and lowest AIC reflecting best fit out of the 4 models.

Predictors in the best model

Our best model included 4 predictors which accounted for 57% of the variance of the full IQ at 4-years of age (Table 3). Of the four predictors, 3 were assessed at birth (maternal education, subjective family wealth, bronchopulmonary dysplasia [BPD] at birth), and one (the aggregated developmental score based on BSID-III) at age 2. Of the four predictors, two were related to the socio-economic status of the family: maternal education and family wealth. Children of higher educated mothers had an average of 8.8 points higher IQ at age 4 than their peers born to primary or secondary educated mothers. Of the socio-demographic factors, the strongest association was found between below-average family wealth and the children’s IQ at 4 years. Preemies of families with below-average wealth scored on average 11.9 points lower in terms of cognitive skills at age 4. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia after birth predicted an average of 8.4 points lower IQ performance at 4 years of age.

Table 3 Predictors in Model 4
Full size table

Out of the predictors in our final model, developmental characteristics at 2 years of age was found to be a strong predictor of later IQ: 1-point increase of the Q-value in two-year-old BSID average performance results in a 0.77-point IQ increase at 4 years of age (Table 3).

Discussion

Low birthweight children were followed in our birth cohort study in order to identify significant predictors of cognitive performance assessed as IQ at 4 years of age. 57% of the variance in 4-year IQ was explained by two parental variables (maternal education and subjective family wealth), bronchopulmonary dysplasia after birth, and developmental characteristics of the child at 2 years of age. Higher education of the mother was a significant positive, lower family wealth was a significant negative predictor in the final model. Developmental characteristics assessed at 2 years of age such as cognitive, motor and language skills were strong positive predictors of the IQ at age 4.

Strengths of our study are the panel design with two years of follow-up, and the relatively large sample size. The wide range of collected data including parental and familial factors, perinatal data and developmental assessment at 2 years of age allowed multiple regression modeling of the cognitive outcome at 4 years of age. One limitation of our study is the limited range of parental information. We had neither information on relevant maternal conditions such as nutritional status or illicit drug use, nor on any information about the fathers or the quality of the parental relationship that all potentially have an impact on intrauterine growth. An age-fitted control group could have enabled us to compare the developmental delay of our cohort. However, the development of LBW children should primarily be compared to their own previous status so the lack of control does not hinder the interpretation of our findings.

In contrast with other researchers [4, 18, 19] we did not find birth weight or gestational age to be significant predictors of later IQ among LBW children. In most of these studies no information was provided on parental characteristics which might explain the different results. When evaluating our results it is crucial to consider the fact that our predictors are sequential in the sense of providing a longitudinal perspective. Thus, as opposed to many other studies that looked at socio-demographic and perinatal predictors, our study also included developmental measurements at the end of the second year of life. Our final model shows the direct effect of the selected variables on IQ at 4 years and not any indirect impact mediated by fators during the first two years of life. This might explain why perinatal factors that showed significant correlation with the outcome in bivariate analysis did not remain in the final model. It is notable that birth weight was not a significant predictor in any of our models.

Maternal education and family wealth have been shown to be substantial predictors of later IQ among healthy children (4–6). Our study, similarly to others, identified this relationship not only among healthy children but also in low birth weight children. Regarding maternal education, a college or university degree proved to be a positive factor for the child’s IQ, while below-average subjective family wealth was an important negative predictor for intelligence at age 4. The neonatal diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was a risk factor for the outcome in our study, consistent with the finding of other groups [20, 21].

Exploring the underlying causes for delayed intelligence among LBW children with chronic lung disease, it must be noted that preterm birth itself disturbs corticogenesis in the brain [22] with later consequences in the form of behavioral and emotional problems which are compounded if clinical conditions including bronchopulmonary dysplasia are also present in the neonates [23]. Newer research specifically showed that preterm infants with BPD had smaller cerebral white matter volumes and impaired cerebellar development compared to preemies with no BPD [24].

Our findings regarding association between demographic factors of the family and the child’s IQ are in alignment with previous research [4, 5, 25]. Children of highly educated parents tend to have better outcomes along several dimensions of life, such as cognition, education, and health [26, 27]. The underlying reasons for this association are manifold: higher educated parents are more knowledgeable, have better job opportunities, generate higher income, have better living conditions which all contribute to them being able to provide more nurturing environments and better educational opportunities for their children [27, 28] as opposed to families with low income [29]. Parental higher education is also linked to greater knowledge about parenting behaviours, educational and health-promoting factors as well [30]. Our results confirm previous findings regarding the significant positive association between paternal income, family wealth, and the child’s working memory and cognitive proficiency [31, 32].

The field of research in early childhood development has seen a great expansion of knowledge in the past 30 years. Increasing attention is being directed to the importance of the early years of childhood, from the Carnegie Report of 1994 in the USA [33] to the seminal publication of the World Health Organization [34], and the establishment in 2006 of the Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University [35]. More and more national and international bodies recognize the vital importance of early childhood, particularly the first three years, in the creation of healthy adults. However, children cannot live and cannot be helped without parents or caretakers. Our study, along with many others, points to the fundamental importance of the quality of the family environment and maternal education as major predictors of the cognitive development of the child. We did not find low birth weight to be the predictor of 4-year intelligence which raises the possibility that LBW may not be a mediator of later intelligence of which the socioeconomic status of the family is determinant, just as LBW is not a mediator between higher socioeconomic level of the family and decreased infant mortality [36].

Interactions between biological (e.g. genetics or heredity; in this case BPD due to prematurity as biological vulnerability) and environmental (e.g. micro- and macro-environment; such as parental education or poverty) factors lead to high variability in developmental outcomes. Tucker-Drob, Briley & Harden (2013) [ highlight that “genetic influences on cognition are maximized by environmental opportunity” [37]. The task of researchers is to uncover the determinants of child development and identify effective ways to improve developmental processes. However, planning and implementing interventions by which all families can improve the conditions in which they raise their children is a task for policy makers. A recent publication of the World Health Organization provides guidelines for improving early childhood development based on a review of scientific evidence [38]. Interventions teaching responsive caregiving to parents improve early child outcomes, among others cognitive development measured by the same tool which we used (Bayley Scale of Infant Development), and language and motor development. In Hungary, early childhood development has been helped in a number of ways. An extensive system of maternal benefits enables mothers to care for their children while on paid leave up to the child’s 3 years of age. Kindergarten education became mandatory from age 3 in 2015 (before that, mandatory age was 5 years). Improvement of parental caregiving is one of the goals of a nationwide government-funded initiative launched in 2004 which was modelled on the Sure Start Programme of the UK. However, this Programme has less professionals than it would need especially in geographical areas in which the proportion of vulnerable populations in low socio-economic strata tend to be high [39].

One of our findings is neonatal bronchopulmonary dysplasia as a significant predictor of the developmental and cognitive performance of the child in later years. The incidence of BPD increases with decreasing gestational age and decreasing birth weight. BPD is the most prevalent complication of prematury among infants born before 28 weeks of gestational age ranging between 11–50%, and this constitutes the major cause of mortality [40]. BPD presents a medical challenge for which a number of treatment modalities have been tried with limited success [41]. The public health approach to decrease BPD is to increase gestational age and decrease low birth weight as detailed in a policy brief of the World Health Organization [42].

Our findings show that developmental assessment at two years of age is crucially important to recognize delays and intervene to prevent further delays in later cognitive functioning, a risk factor for learning difficulties. Our data help prioritize those children who should be regularly monitored and supported in their cognitive development: those with mothers having less than higher education, those in families with below-average subjective wealth, and those with BPD with our without the previous two risk factors. Improving the skills of caregiving persons and the quality of the caregiving environment for all infants but especially for those of low birth weight by effective interventions not only reduces inequalities and is the humane thing to do but it is also cost-effective from a societal point of view [43].

Availability of data and materials

Additional data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BPD:

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

BSID:

Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development

ELBW:

Extremely Low Birthweight

FSIQ:

Full Scale IQ

IQ:

Intelligence Quotient

IVH:

Intraventricular Haemorrhage

LBW:

Low Birthweight

ROP:

Retinopathy of Prematurity

VLBW:

Very Low Birthweight

WHO:

World Health Organization

WPPSI:

Wechsler Preschool Primary Scales of Intelligence

References

  1. Batty GD, Deary IJ, Gottfredson LS. Premorbid (early life) IQ and later mortality risk: Systematic review. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(4):278–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmitt N. Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work. Annu Rev Organ Psych. 2014;1:45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tong S, Baghurst P, Vimpani G, Mcmichael A. Socioeconomic position, maternal IQ, home environment, and cognitive development. J Pediatr-Us. 2007;151(3):284–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eriksen HLF, Kesmodel US, Underbjerg M, Kilburn TR, Bertrand J, Mortensen EL. Predictors of Intelligence at the Age of 5: Family, Pregnancy and Birth Characteristics, Postnatal Influences, and Postnatal Growth. Plos One. 2013;8(11):e79200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alati R, Macleod J, Hickman M, Sayal K, May M, Smith GD, et al. Intrauterine Exposure to Alcohol and Tobacco Use and Childhood IQ: Findings from a Parental-Offspring Comparison within the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Pediatr Res. 2008;64(6):659–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawlor DA, Batty GD, Morton SMB, Deary IJ, Macintyre S, Ronalds G, et al. Early life predictors of childhood intelligence: evidence from the Aberdeen children of the 1950s study. J Epidemiol Commun H. 2005;59(8):656–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mortensen EL, Michaelsen KF, Sanders SA, Reinisch JM. The association between duration of breastfeeding and adult intelligence. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 2002;287(18):2365–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudolf MCJ, Logan S. What is the long term outcome for children who fail to thrive? A systematic review Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(9):925–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elgen I, Sommerfelt K, Ellertsen B. Cognitive performance in a low birth weight cohort at 5 and 11 years of age. Pediatr Neurol. 2003;29(2):111–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sejer EPF, Bruun FJ, Slavensky JA, Mortensen EL, Kesmodel US. Impact of gestational age on child intelligence, attention and executive function at age 5: a cohort study. Bmj Open. 2019;9(9):e028982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Flensborg-Madsen T, Mortensen EL. Infant developmental milestones and adult intelligence: A 34-year follow-up. Early Human Dev. 2015;91(7):393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. 3rd ed. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wechsler D. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. 4th ed. San Antonio: Pearson; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kő N, Mészáros A, Rózsa S, Szabó C, Mlinkó R. WPPSI-IV Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. In: Technical/Interpretive Manual. 4th ed. Budapest: OS Hungary Kft; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Apgar V. A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(5):1056–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kenyhercz F, Nagy BE. A new perspective: Establishing developmental profiles of premature infants based on Bayley-III scores at age 2. Appl Neuropsych-Chil. 2020:1–8. Epub ahead of print.

  17. Kő N, Rózsa S, Mészáros A, Kálózi-Szabó C, Nagy B. Hungarian Handbook of Bayley – III Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: Hungarian Experiences, Results and Standards. Budapest: OS Hungary Kft; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matte TD, Bresnahan M, Begg MD, Susser E. Influence of variation in birth weight within normal range and within sibships on IQ at age 7 years: cohort study. Brit Med J. 2001;323(7308):310–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shenkin SD, Starr JM, Deary IJ. Birth weight and cognitive ability in childhood: A systematic review. Psychol Bull. 2004;130(6):989–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chiriboga CA, Kuban KCK, Durkin M, Hinton V, Kuhn L, Sanocka U, et al. Factors associated with microcephaly at school age in a very-low-birthweight population. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45(12):796–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Short EJ, Klein NK, Lewis BA, Fulton S, Eisengart S, Kercsmar C, et al. Cognitive and academic consequences of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and very low birth weight: 8-year-old outcomes. Pediatrics. 2003;112(5):E359–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ment LR, Vohr BR. Preterm birth and the developing brain. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(5):378–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cassiano RGM, Gaspardo CM, Linhares MBM. Prematurity, Neonatal Health Status, and Later Child Behavioral/Emotional Problems: A Systematic Review. Infant Ment Health J. 2016;37(3):274–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee JM, Choi YH, Hong J, Kim NY, Kim EB, Lim JS, et al. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Is Associated with Altered Brain Volumes and White Matter Microstructure in Preterm Infants. Neonatology. 2019;116(2):163–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benavente-Fernandez I, Synnes A, Grunau RE, Chau V, Ramraj C, Glass T, et al. Association of Socioeconomic Status and Brain Injury With Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Preterm Children. Jama Netw Open. 2019;2(5):e192914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haveman R, Wolfe B. The determinants of children’s attainments: A review of methods and findings. J Econ Lit. 1995;33(4):1829–78.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lundborg P, Nilsson A, Rooth DO. Parental Education and Offspring Outcomes: Evidence from the Swedish Compulsory School Reform. Am Econ J-Appl Econ. 2014;6(1):253–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guryan J, Hurst E, Kearney M. Parental education and parental time with children. J Econ Perspect. 2008;22(3):23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dickerson A, Popli GK. Persistent poverty and children’s cognitive development: evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. J R Stat Soc a Stat. 2016;179(2):535–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Violato M, Petrou S, Gray R, Redshaw M. Family Income and Child Cognitive and Behavioural Development in the United Kingdom: Does Money Matter? Health Econ. 2011;20(10):1201–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Murtaza SF, Gan WY, Sulaiman N, Shariff ZM, Ismail SIF. Sociodemographic, nutritional, and environmental factors are associated with cognitive performance among Orang Asli children in Malaysia. Plos One. 2019;14(7):e0219841.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Khanam R, Nghiem S. Family Income and Child Cognitive and Noncognitive Development in Australia: Does Money Matter? Demography. 2016;53(3):597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Carnegie Corporation. Starting Points. In: Meeting the needs of our youngest children. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mikulencak M. World Health Organization. A critical link: Interventions for physical growth and psychological development: a review. World Health Organization; 1999.

  35. Harvard University. Center on the Developing Child 2021 [Available from: https://developingchild.harvard.edu/.

  36. Gage TB, Fang F, O’Neill E, DiRienzo G. Maternal Education, Birth Weight, and Infant Mortality in the United States. Demography. 2013;50(2):615–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tucker-Drob EM, Briley DA, Harden KP. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Cognition Across Development and Context. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013;22(5):349–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Word Health Organization. Recommendations on Caregiving Interventions to Support Early Child Development in the First Three Years of Life: Report of the systematic review of evidence. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Németh Sz. Heterogeneity of Sure Start children's houses: A case study. MTA TK Gyerekesély Műhelytanulmányok, 2018/2. Budapest: MTA TK.

  40. Thebaud B, Goss KN, Laughon M, Whitsett JA, Abman SH, Steinhorn RH, et al. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Isayama T, Iwami H, McDonald S, Beyene J. Association of Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies With Mortality and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Among Preterm Infants A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 2016;316(6):611–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Word Health Organization. Low Birth Weight Policy Brief. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Engle PL, Fernald LCH, Alderman H, Behrman J, O’Gara C, Yousafzai A, et al. Child Development 2 Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2011;378(9799):1339–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the children and mothers for their cooperation in data collection. We are grateful to prof. György Balla, prof. Gábor Veres, and prof. Tamás Szabó for authorizing our research.

Statement on dual publication

The descriptive statistics of the sample and the 4-year IQ results have been published but the analysis and modelling presented in this manuscript has neither been published nor submitted elsewhere.

Funding

Flóra Kenyhercz and Karolina Kósa were supported by the GINOP-2.3.2–15-2016–00005 project during the preparation and writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

    Flóra Kenyhercz & Karolina Kósa

  2. Faculty of Medicine, Department of PediatricsPediatric Psychology and Psychosomatic Unit, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

    Beáta Erika Nagy

Authors
  1. Flóra Kenyhercz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karolina Kósa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beáta Erika Nagy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FK contributed to study design, carried out all assessments and data collection, analysed the data, and drafted the manuscript. KK performed the modeling, edited and approved the final version of the manuscript. BEN initiated the research, designed the study, provided supervision to FK, and approved the final version of the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flóra Kenyhercz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received permission from the Hungarian Medical Research Council (33,176–2/2017/EKU) following the ethical principles of the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all parent(s)/ legal guardians.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and consented for publication.

Competing interests

Authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kenyhercz, F., Kósa, K. & Nagy, B.E. Perinatal, neonatal, developmental and demographic predictors of intelligence at 4 years of age among low birth weight children: a panel study with a 2-year follow-up. BMC Pediatr 22, 88 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03156-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03156-x

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us