Skip to main content

The clinical value of passive leg raising plus ultrasound to predict fluid responsiveness in children after cardiac surgery



There are few non-invasive monitoring methods that can reliably predict fluid responsiveness (FR) in children. Here, we interrogate the value of doppler ultrasound evaluation of passive leg raising (PLR)-induced changes in stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) as a predictor of FR in children with mechanical ventilation after congenital cardiac surgery.


A total of 40 children with mechanical ventilation following congenital cardiac surgery, who required volume expansion (VE) were included in this study. Hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), SV, and central venous pressure (CVP) were monitored before and after PLR and VE. Besides, we assessed changes in SV and CO by bedside ultrasound. Patients showing > 10 % increase in SV in response to VE were considered to be responders (26 patients), while the rest (14 patients) were defined as non-responders.


Our data demonstrated that ΔSV-PLR and ΔCO- PLR were positively correlated with ΔSV-VE (r = 0.683, p < 0.001 and r = 0.374, p = 0.017, respectively), and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ΔSV-PLR was 0.879 (95 % CI [0.745 1.000], p < 0.001). The best cut-off value for ΔSV-PLR in predicting FR was 13 %, with its sensitivity and specificity were 81.8 and 86.3 %, respectively. ΔCVP, ΔHR, and ΔMAP were weak predictors of FR in the children.


Our study demonstrated that SV changes, as evaluated by noninvasive ultrasound combined with PLR, could effectively evaluate FR in children under mechanical ventilation after congenital cardiac surgery.

Peer Review reports


Proper fluid loading is pivotal in maintaining hemodynamic stability in children who undergo congenital cardiac surgery [1]. Classical fluid challenge methods that evaluate the FR create an extra fluid burden on patients with congenital heart disease which might result into serious side effects such as exacerbated tissue edema, organ failure, or mortality [2, 3]. Whereas Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO), which integrates a wide array of both static and dynamic hemodynamic data such as SV, is considered to be a “gold standard”, it is expensive, invasive, and could cause catheter infection [4, 5]. Until now, there are few non-invasive monitoring methods that can reliably predict FR in children, except for respiratory changes in peak aortic flow velocity [6, 7]. It is, therefore, essential to explore a simple, effective, and non-invasive method for evaluating the FR and volume status in children.

Passive leg raising (PLR) is a simple repeatable self-replenishing fluid method done to shift venous blood from the lower limbs toward the intrathoracic compartment [8, 9]. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE ) is a non-invasive method that allows for real-time monitoring of the descending aortic blood flow, and the estimation of SV [10, 11]. Therefore, using the bedside ultrasound to measure the SV variation triggered by PLR may be important in the evaluation of FR in children.

Here, we tested whether PLR related changes in SV and CO as monitored by bedside echocardiography could accurately predict FR in children with mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery.


Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shangrao Fifth People's Hospital (No.2016-12-01). All participants gave written informed consent prior to their enrollment in this study.

General information

This prospective observational study was carried out at the integrated Intensive Care Unit of the Fifth People’s Hospital of Shangrao City (Shangrao, China) from December 2016 to July 2017. We enrolled a total of 48 patients who were under mechanical ventilation following cardiac surgery, and whose attending physician conducted a fluid challenge. The execution of the fluid challenge dependent on at least one clinical sign of inadequate tissue perfusion, with no contraindications for infusion. The clinical signs of inadequate tissue perfusion were characterized by acute circulatory failure (30 % decrease in Mean arterial pressure [MAP], or need vasopressor drugs to maintain normal systolic blood pressure; 10 % increase in heart rate[HR] without arrhythmia; < 0.5 ml·kg− 1·h− 1 urine output for at least 1 h), mottled skin, oliguria (less than 0.5 ml·kg− 1·h− 1 diuresis), 1.5-fold increase in arterial blood lactic acid, acute kidney failure, or clinical and laboratory signs of extracellular dehydration [4, 12]. We excluded patients with clinical signs of hemorrhage, arrhythmia, PLR contraindication, less than 0.30 left ventricular ejection fraction, more than 40 mmHg pulmonary artery systolic pressure, or known allergic reaction to albumin.

Echocardiography and Hemodynamic Data collection

A 4-5.5fr central venous catheter was inserted into the right internal jugular vein or the right/left subclavian vein to monitor CVP, while a 7 cm 3fr arterial catheter was inserted into the right or left femoral artery to monitor dynamic blood pressure, before operation. MAP was calculated as MAP = (systolic arterial pressure + 2diastolic artery pressure)/3. The standard transthoracic probe (3SP-D) of GE VIVIVIXE9 Doppler echocardiography was used to measure SV. On the five chambers apical view, the aortic blood flow was recorded using pulsed Doppler, with the sample volume placed on the annulus aorta. A velocity-time integral (VTI) of the aortic blood flow was also measured. The aortic valve area was calculated from the diameter of the aortic orifice, measured at insertion of the aortic cusps, as aortic area = π* (aortic diameter/2)2. SV and CO were measured with the equations: SV = VTI × aortic area, and CO = SV × HR. The aortic area was considered to be stable during the trial and was measured only once in the initial measurement. Every VTI measurement was taken based on two or three measurements in one breathing cycle. All of the measurements were conducted by a cardiologist.

Study Design

The patients were placed in a supine position, with the upper body parts being 45° higher (Base 1) and four hemodynamic parameters (HR, blood pressure, SV, and CVP) were measured. Afterwards, the upper parts of the body were lowered to achieve a horizontal position and the lower extremities raised to 45° (Base 2), and then the four hemodynamic parameters were measured again within 30 s to 1 min. The patients were placed back to the initial position (the upper parts being 45° higher, Base 3) for 10 min and the hemodynamic parameters were remeasured. Besides, the four hemodynamic parameters were again measured immediately following the administration of the bolus of the intravenous fluid challenge using 10 ml/kg of 5 % albumin in 15 min. The patients showing > 10 % increase in SV in response to the VE were considered responders, while the rest were defined as non-responders. All the procedures were conducted while the patients were kept fully sedated, and the parameters such as the use of vasoactive drugs, sedatives and mechanical ventilation remained unchanged.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as the mean ± standard deviation if normally distributed, or as a median (range) if the distribution was not normal. Student’s unpaired t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test was used to evaluate group differences. To assess the correlation between ΔSV-VE and PLR related ΔSV, ΔMAP, ΔHR, ΔCVP, or ΔCO, linear regression analysis was performed. Linear correlations were tested using the Pearson test and linear regression method. To determine the ability of all the variables to predict fluid responsiveness, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the area under the ROC curve was calculated. The ROC curves were compared using the Hanley–McNeil test [13]. Youden’s index was calculated as: Youden’s index = sensitivity + specificity – 1 [14]. A p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All the statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS 23.0 (SPSS, Inc, Armonk, NY).


Patient Characteristics

A total of 48 patients who were under mechanical ventilation with presumed hypovolemia and were considered for VE were included in the study from December 2016 to December 2017. Among these eligible patients, 8 were excluded because of poor transthoracic insonation. Therefore, 40 patients (18 females and 22 males) with mean age of 5.41 ± 3.25 years were included in the study. There were patients with ventricular septum defect (VSD) (n = 18, 45 %), tetralogy of fallot (TOF) (n = 4, 10 %), atrial septal defect (ASD) (n = 11, 27.5 %), or ASD + VSD (n = 7, 17.5 %). There was no significant difference in age, gender, vasoactive drug usage score, ventilator parameters, and indication for ICU stay (p > 0.05). The clinical characteristics for the two groups are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient characteristics. Values are expressed in frequencies (%), median (with IQR) or mean (± SD)

Hemodynamic changes to PLR and VE

ΔSV in 26 children (responders) increased by more than 10 % from the base 3 value after VE, while ΔSV in 14 patients (non-responders) increased by less than 10 %. There were no significant shifts in all hemodynamic changes (p > 0.05) between Base 3 and Base 1. The hemodynamic parameters before and after PLR and VE are listed in Table 2; Fig. 1.

Table 2 Hemodynamic parameters in responders and non-responders
Fig. 1

Evaluation of the ΔSV for the four steps of the study expressed as percentage change from Base 1. p < 0.05 vs.Base 1; #p < 0.05 vs. Base 3

Correlations and ROC curves

The ΔSV-PLR and ΔCO- PLR were positively correlated with ΔSV-VE (Pearson’s r = 0.683, p < 0.001 and r = 0.374, p = 0.017, respectively). The highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) for ΔSV-PLR (0.879 ± 0.069) successfully predicted FR in the patients (95 % CI [0.745 1.000], p < 0.001). The correlation between Δ-PLR and ΔSV-VE is shown in Table 3; Fig. 2.

Table 3 Diagnostic accuracy of index changes induced by PLR for predicting fluid responsiveness
Fig. 2

Linear correlation for all the parameters against ΔSV-VE a Correlation between ΔSV-PLR and ΔSV-VE. b Correlation between ΔHR-PLR and ΔSV-VE. c Correlation between ΔCO-PLR and ΔSV-VE. d Correlation between ΔCVP-PLR and ΔSV-VE. e Correlation between ΔMAP-PLR and ΔSV-VE. PLR: Passive leg raising; VE: Volume expansion

Diagnostic performance of FR

The optimal ΔSV-PLR threshold for predicting FR was 13 %, and its sensitivity and specificity were 81.8 and 86.3 %, respectively. The positive and negative predictive cut-offs were 85.0 and 82.0 %, respectively. The optimal threshold values and associated sensitivities and specificities are presented in Table 3; Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

ROC curves comparing the ability of PLRinduced changes to discriminate responders from non-responders against VE. PLR: Passive leg raising; ROC: Receiveroperating characteristic; VE: Volume expansion


Prediction of FR is critical in fluid therapy after cardiac surgery, especially in children. Significant changes in ventricular systolic and diastolic functions after cardiac surgery often lead to difficulties in predicting FR [15, 16]. Here, we demonstrated that PLR related SV changes (ΔSV-PLR) as evaluated by bedside ultrasound could effectively predict FR in intubated children undergoing congenital heart surgery procedure. Our data showed that the optimal ΔSV-PLR threshold for predicting FR was 13 %.

PLR is a simple, noninvasive and repeatable method to change the cardiac preload [8, 9, 17]. Studies have shown that hemodynamic changes such as SV and aortic blood flow can be observed after 30 s of the elevation of lower limbs [18]. Our results showed that PLR can cause significant changes in hemodynamic parameters such as MAP, CVP, CO and SV (from base 1 to base 2), and all these parameters can also be restored to baseline level when the body position is returned to the Base 1 position (base 3 vs. base 1). This preliminary observation indicated that PLR could be used as a reversible fluid challenge.

In recent years, bedside ultrasonography has been considered as a noninvasive, real-time, convenient, low-cost, and repeatable tool for monitoring hemodynamics [10, 11, 19,20,21]. Previous studies have confirmed that echocardiography was highly correlated with PICCO in CO and SV, and PLR combined with non-invasive ultrasound has significant advantages in evaluating FR, which can be determined by monitoring SV and aortic blood flow [22,23,24]. The use of ΔSV-PLR to predict FR is based on the beneficial effects of cardiac preload on left ventricle function [25], which is not affected by changes in intrathoracic pressure, myocardial compliance, mechanical ventilation, or drug use. The best cut-off value for ΔSV in predicting FR fluctuates from 7 to 20 %, indicating a large variation among different studies [22,23,24]. Our study demonstrated that an increase of more than 13 % in the ΔSV-PLR can predict the FR in children after cardiac surgery, with a sensitivity of 81 %, a specificity of 86 %, and the AUC of 0.879.

Whereas CVP, MAP, and HR were relatively easy to monitor, we did not observe any correlation with ΔSV-VE. Our data showed that ΔCO-PLR could predict FR, with an optimal threshold of 8 %, sensitivity of 81 % and specificity of 71 %. But the correlation between ΔCO-PLR and ΔSV-VE was not comparable to that of the ΔSV-PLR, which may be due to the influence of the HR on CO measurement. Consistent with the previous findings, our study found that ΔSV-PLR can better predict FR compared with the other PLR-Δs [26].

There are some limitations in this study. First, echocardiographic measurement errors may have occurred, even though the same expert obtained all echocardiographic data. Second, because of the different types of congenital heart diseases and the diverse changes in cardiac structure after operation, our results cannot be extrapolated to other types of congenital heart diseases and to children of all ages, because leg elevation in newborns or infants obviously does not have the same volume effect as leg elevation in older children. Third, based on previous studies, we defined a 10 % increase in SV with rapid fluid loading as FR-positive. Whether the 10 % cut off is the appropriate threshold needs further research. Another limitation is that it is also a small sample, non-blinded study, and the results may not be applicable to other centers. Finally, someone is a fluid “responder” does not mean that they need a fluid bolus. If a healthy normally hydrated person is given a fluid bolus, their stroke volume will also increase, however, that does not mean that they need fluid. This is probably why the increases in MAP overall are very modest in our study even in responders. Therefore, further investigations of high-quality are needed to confirm our findings.


In conclusion, our study demonstrated that assessment of the SV changes by noninvasive ultrasound combined with PLR could be used to evaluate fluid responsiveness in children under mechanical ventilation after congenital cardiac surgery.

Availability of data and materials

We declare that all relevant data and materials are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Atrial septal defect


Area under the ROC curve


Central venous pressure


Cardiac output


Fluid responsiveness


Heart rate


Mean arterial pressure


Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output


Passive leg raising


Receiver operating characteristic


Stroke volume


Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography


Tetralogy of fallot


Velocity-time integral


Volume expansion


Ventricular septum defect


  1. 1.

    Roth SJ, Adatia I, Pearson GD. Members of the Cardiology Group. Summary proceedings from the cardiology group on postoperative cardiac dysfunction. Pediatrics. 2006; 117:S40-6.

  2. 2.

    Wang N, Jiang L, Zhu B, Wen Y, Xi XM. Beijing Acute Kidney Injury Trial (BAKIT) Workgroup. Fluid balance and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a multicenter prospective epidemiological study. Crit Care. 2015;19:371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Teixeira C, Garzotto F, Piccinni P, Brienza N, Iannuzzi M, Gramaticopolo S, Forfori F, Pelaia P, Rocco M, Ronco C, Anello CB, Bove T, Carlini M, Michetti V, Cruz DN. NEFROlogia e Cura INTensiva (NEFROINT) investigators. Fluid balance and urine volume are independent predictors of mortality in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2013;17:R14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Litton E, Morgan M. The PiCCO monitor: a review. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40:393–409.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gil-Anton J, López-Bayón J, López-Fernández Y, Morteruel E, Pérez-Estevez E, López-Herce J. Cardiac index monitoring by femoral arterial thermodilution after cardiac surgery in children. J Crit Care. 2014;29:1132.e1-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gan H, Cannesson M, Chandler JR, Ansermino JM. Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:1380–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Desgranges FP, Desebbe O, Pereira de Souza Neto E, Raphael D, Chassard D. Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26:37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Odenstedt H, Åneman A, Oi Y, Svensson M, Stenqvist O, Lundin S. Descending aortic blood flow and cardiac output: A clinical and experimental study of continuous oesophageal echo-Doppler flowmetry. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;45:180–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Préau S, Saulnier F, Dewavrin F, Durocher A, Chagnon JL. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:819–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Biais M, Vidil L, Sarrabay P, Cottenceau V, Revel P, Sztark F. Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo/FloTrac device. Crit Care. 2009;13:R195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    El Hadouti Y, Valencia L, Becerra A, Rodríguez-Pérez A, Vincent JL. Echocardiography and passive leg raising in the postoperative period: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:748–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rizza A, Romagnoli S, Ricci Z. Fluid Status Assessment and Management During the Perioperative Phase in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:1085–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Le CT, Lindgren BR. Construction and Comparison of Two Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves Derived from the Same Samples. Biom J. 1995;37:869–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chamos C. Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization. Perioper Med (Lond). 2013;2:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Choi DY, Kwak HJ, Park HY, Kim YB, Choi CH, Lee JY. Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow velocity as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in children after repair of ventricular septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;31:1166–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Halimi KE, Negadi M, Bouguetof H, Zemour L, Boumendil D, Mentouri Z. Respiratory variations in aortic blood flow velocity and inferior vena cava diameter as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children using transthoracic echocardiography in a pediatric PICU. Crit Care. 2015;19:181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1935–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pickett JD, Bridges E, Kritek PA, Whitney JD. Passive Leg-Raising and Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness: Systematic Review. Crit Care Nurse. 2017;37:32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mielnicki W, Dyla A, Zawada TJMU. Utility of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients - a challenge for the bedside sonographer. Med Ultrason. 2016;18:508–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mandeville JC, Colebourn CL. Can Transthoracic Echocardiography Be Used to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in the Critically Ill Patient? A Systematic Review. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012; 2012:513480.

  21. 21.

    Llamas-Álvarez AM, Tenza-Lozano EM, Latour-Pérez J. Accuracy of Lung Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Chest. 2017;151:374–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Candela D, Zoric L, Suehs C, de La Coussaye JE, Molinari N, Lefrant JY. AzuRéa Group. An Increase in Aortic Blood Flow after an Infusion of 100 ml Colloid over 1 Minute Can Predict Fluid Responsiveness:The Mini-fluid Challenge Study. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:541–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, La Torre G, Mannocci A, De Waure C, Bello G, Maviglia R, Antonelli M. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1475–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Thiel SW, Kollef MH, Isakow W. Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg raising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: an observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2009;13:R111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Brothers RM, Pecini R, Dalsgaard M, Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Wilson TE, Secher NH, Crandall CG. Beneficial effects of elevating cardiac preload on left-ventricular diastolic function and volume during heat stress: implications toward tolerance during a hemorrhagic insult. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014;307:R1036-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Si X, Cao DY, Chen J, Wu JF, Liu ZM, Xu HL, Chen MY, Liu YJ, Guan XD. Effect of Systolic Cardiac Function on Passive Leg Raising for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness: A Prospective Observational Study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2018;131:253–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references




No financial or nonfinancial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81560306 and 81460292) and Science and Technology Plan Projects of the Health and Family Planning Commission of Jiangxi Province (202120112).

Author information




DQL participated in the study design, contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafted the manuscript. WD and LL made substantial contributions to the acquisition and interpretation of data. XYC conceived and designed the study, and helped to draft and revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xueying Cai.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and a written approval letter was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Shangrao Fifth People’s Hospital (No.20161201). The written informed consent was obtained from the parent or guardian of all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that there is no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, D., Dai, W., Lei, L. et al. The clinical value of passive leg raising plus ultrasound to predict fluid responsiveness in children after cardiac surgery. BMC Pediatr 21, 243 (2021).

Download citation


  • congenital heart surgery
  • fluid responsiveness
  • passive leg raising
  • ultrasound