Skip to main content

Portal vein thrombosis and food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis in a premature newborn with hypereosinophilia: a case report



Peripheral blood eosinophilia is identified in numerous medical conditions associated with allergic, infectious, and inflammatory processes mostly as reactive eosinophilia with or without tissue eosinophilia. In hospitalized neonates, eosinophilia is common with an inverse relationship with gestational age and occurs solely as mild eosinophilia in the majority of cases. In the literature, eosinophilia has been proposed as a possible risk factor for venous thromboembolism. However, few reports are found on thromboembolic events including portal vein thrombosis (PVT) associated with eosinophilia in the newborn period.

Neonates, particularly preterm infants, are vulnerable to thrombosis due to the immature and developing hemostatic system with little reserve capacity, which occurs as catheter-related thrombosis in most cases.

Case presentation

A male newborn at 34+ 5 weeks’ gestation presented with a left portal venous thrombus and hematochezia after initial cow’s milk feeding in the setting of blood hypereosinophilia for a prolonged period of time without central venous catheterization. The infant was diagnosed with PVT and food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP) and showed complete resolution of the conditions with expectant management with food avoidance, including the normalized eosinophil count.


Our experience suggests that in the setting of hypereosinophilia with a prolonged duration in premature neonates, FPIAP should be suspected in case of hematochezia in otherwise healthy infants, and considering the increased thrombotic risk by the hypereosinophilia and premature newborn status, evaluation for neonatal thrombosis may be needed, including PVT with the potential risk for the more serious, but uncommon, late complications encompassing portal hypertension.

Peer Review reports


Peripheral blood eosinophilia is common in hospitalized neonates as evidenced by the inverse relationship between the occurrence and severity of eosinophilia and gestational age and the reported incidence of 75% in premature infants less than 27 weeks’ gestation [1,2,3]. Eosinophilia in neonates has been defined as an absolute eosinophil count ≥700 cells/mm3, and subclassified as mild (700–999 cells/mm3), moderate (1000–2999 cells/mm3), or severe (≥3000 cells/mm3) [1]. Eosinophils, as myelopoietic effector cells residing in various tissues including the airways, skin and gastrointestinal mucosa, have functions such as host defense and immune modulation via secretion of intracytoplasmic granules containing cytotoxic molecules, cytokines and chemokines, which can result in end-organ damage [4,5,6,7]. In neonates, although most of neonates with eosinophilia present solely with mild eosinophilia [2], previous reports have shown various associated conditions with eosinophilia including food hypersensitivity encompassing cow’s milk allergy (CMA) and food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP), drug reactions, infection/sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, hypereosinophilic syndrome, and eosinophilic leukemia [8, 1,2,3], with some evidence of elevated eosinophil counts as a predictive marker of atopic disease development [9]. Furthermore, blood eosinophilia has been proposed as a possible risk factor for venous thromboembolism in prior reports showing possible links between eosinophilia and a prothrombotic state or thrombosis [10,11,12,13,14]. However, few reports are found on thromboembolic events including portal vein thrombosis (PVT) associated with eosinophilia in the newborn period.

Neonates, particularly preterm infants, have factors elevating thrombotic risk including the immature and developing coagulation and fibrinolytic systems with little reserve capacity, small vessel diameters, and numerous affected disorders that can disrupt hemostatic balance [15, 16]. Most (up to 94%) of neonatal thrombosis cases have been reported to be associated with indwelling central venous catheters, including umbilical catheters [16].

Herein, we report a rare case of PVT and FPIAP in the setting of blood eosinophilia for a prolonged period of time in a premature newborn with no history of umbilical venous catheterization (UVC).

Case presentation

A Korean male infant with a weight of 2980 g (91st percentile) was born to a 37-year-old woman (gravida 2 and para 2) at 34+ 5 weeks’ gestation via normal spontaneous vaginal delivery. Apgar scores were 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 min after birth, respectively. The mother and other family members had no known allergies and no other particular medical history including the maternal history of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and neurologic disease, with the mother’s consumption of a small amount of cow’s milk only as food additives during pregnancy. The pregnancy was not complicated by any abnormalities encompassing maternal fever, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, premature or prolonged rupture of membranes, and placental abruption. The placental examination was unremarkable. The infant’s general condition was good and oral intake commenced with a total of 60 ml of preterm formula milk. Four hours after initial feeding, three episodes of non-projectile, non-bilious emesis developed with approximately 5 ml milky vomitus on each occasion, followed by hematochezia 5 h later. Table 1 shows the flow of the infant’s laboratory and clinical data. Initial laboratory evaluation demonstrated a mild leukocytosis (white blood cells 11,400/μL) and eosinophilia (eosinophil fraction 14% and eosinophils 1530/μL), raised D-dimer 1718.3 vs. control < 500 ng/mL DDU, and mild conjugated hyperbilirubinemia (total bilirubin 1.5 mg/dL with the direct fraction 40%), with the other following data (hemoglobin 13.0 g/dL, hematocrit 37.7%, platelets 274,000/μL, C-reactive protein 0.04 mg/dL, prothrombin time 13.4 vs. 10.1–12.6 s with the international normalized ratio 1.19 vs. 0.93–1.13, partial thromboplastin time 42.8 vs. 23.6–31.1 s, antithrombin III 43%, and fibrinogen 256 vs. 180–350 mg/dL). Serum total immunoglobulin E (IgE) was 0.1 IU/ml (normal values < 5.0) and specific IgEs to cow’s milk proteins (CMPs) were negative. The Apt test for fresh blood in the stools did not change color and fecal occult blood was positive. A chest-abdomen plain radiograph showed a normal bowel gas pattern without other abnormalities. Oral feeds were discontinued from postnatal day 1. Total parenteral nutrition was instituted on day 2 and maintained until day 9. The stools mixed with macroscopic bleeding more than in the form of spots persisted during the first 3 days of life. From day 5, oral feedings were reintroduced with breast milk without maternal diet modification and/or casein hydrolyzed milk, which were tolerable without reactions including gastrointestinal symptoms and metabolic acidosis. On day 6, abdominal ultrasonography revealed a non-obstructive thrombus within the umbilico-portal confluence of the left portal vein as a hypoechoic tubular structure (Fig. 1a and b). On day 19, the peak eosinophil count of 3790/μL was observed with a low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D 16.1 ng/mL (insufficiency < 30 and deficiency < 10). On day 75, the eosinophil count decreased to 590/μL and a supervised oral challenge to cow’s milk was performed. Feeding intolerance with vomiting and blood-tinged stools was noted and the feeding was changed back to the casein-hydrolyzed formula. At 6 months of age, oral re-challenge to regular cow’s milk feeding was attempted and no reaction was observed. The sonographic signal of the intraluminal thrombus gradually decreased in size and became heterogeneously hyperechoic over time (Fig. 2). At 1 year of age of the last follow-up ultrasonography, the thrombus completely resolved. The infant showed good weight gain with well-tolerated formula feeds.

Table 1 Laboratory and clinical data of the present case
Fig. 1
figure 1

a Longitudinal gray scale sonogram of the left lobe of the liver on postnatal day 6 shows a thrombus (white arrow) within the umbilico-portal confluence of the left portal vein contiguous with the umbilical vein (open arrow) as a 1.10 × 0.60 cm-sized, hypoechoic tubular structure in two dimensions. b Corresponding color Doppler sonogram shows non-obstructive thrombosis (white arrow) with the presence of flow around the thrombus

Fig. 2
figure 2

Longitudinal gray scale sonogram of the left lobe of the liver at the age of 6 months depicts partial resolution of the thrombus (white arrow) within the left portal vein, as the sonographic signal of the intraluminal thrombus decreased in size and became hyperechoic over time, with the adjacent ligamentum teres (open arrow) as a result of the involution of the umbilical vein via fibrotic transformation

Discussion and conclusions

Our premature infant presented with moderate-to-severe eosinophilia or hypereosinophilia (eosinophil counts > 1500/mm3) [6], which had been detected over at least 1 month after birth (Table 1). The hypereosinophilia was initially observed prior to the first formula feeding and may be associated with the two concurrent conditions in the newborn period: FPIAP as a CMA manifesting as bloody stools without typical allergic cutaneous and respiratory symptoms following a brief exposure to CMP and grade 1 PVT according to the proposed grading system by Morag et al. [17], appearing as non-occlusive portal venous thrombus with normal liver parenchyma at ultrasound.

FPIAP is a benign non-IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity, mostly as CMP intolerance, presenting in the first 6 months of life with blood-mixed stools in well-looking infants, generally with the remission by 1 year of age [18, 19]. In this case, the diagnosis of FPIAP was established based on the clinical history including CMP intolerance symptoms (emesis and hematochezia after the initial feeding), recovery from the symptoms after elimination diets, and the confirmatory challenge (recurrence of the symptoms following oral provocation with cow’s milk) despite lack of rectosigmoidoscopy with a biopsy to document the histopathology of eosinophilic proctocolitis. The other causes of rectal bleeding including necrotizing enterocolitis and food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome were discriminated via the findings including mild symptoms, the infant’s otherwise healthy status, the C-reactive protein levels and non-specific radiographic results. The CMA of our infant resulted in being self-limited since the successful oral cow’s milk re-challenge at 6 months of age, with the normalized eosinophil count.

Neonatal PVT is a rare thrombotic event incidentally found during routine evaluation for other diseases in infancy [20]. A prospective study of 123 premature neonates born at < 33 weeks’ gestation or with < 1500 g birthweight revealed the high PVT incidence of 43% [21]. In the majority of cases, neonatal PVT affects the left portal vein encompassing umbilico-portal confluence, is clinically silent, is associated with UVC, particularly inadequate peripheral placement of catheter tips under the diaphragm, and shows favorable short-term outcomes with spontaneous resolution of the most thrombi without anticoagulant or fibrinolytic therapy [16, 20, 21]. However, serious complications including liver lobe atrophy, portal hypertension and gastrointestinal hemorrhage can develop later in childhood largely in persistent, extensive and occlusive PVT [20, 22]. A recent prospective case-control study on thrombosis in the UVC route with serial ultrasound screening did not demonstrate any thrombus forming process in 20 matched control neonates at 27–41 weeks’ gestation without UVC until median day 13 (1–17) after birth [16]. In our infant, PVT occurred with no history of central venous catheterization as a single lesion, non-occlusive and not propagating, within the left portal vein, which was fortuitously identified in the ultrasonography and completely resolved with expectant management. Accordingly, our case is in line with previous reports addressing that for the treatment of neonatal thrombosis, a ‘watch and wait’ approach may be applicable to most cases, especially cases with asymptomatic thrombi [16, 21].

Eosinophils have been believed to be possible direct target cells in cellular immune responses induced by CMP [23]. A recent study of 185 infants with FPIAP documented that eosinophil counts > 1000/mm3 were associated with severe rectal bleeding with mild-to-moderate anemia [18]. Eosinophils may be directly involved in thrombogenesis via several molecules in the intracytoplasmic specific granules with effects associated with thrombin generation and fibrin formation, including major basic protein (MBP), eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) and the coagulation initiator tissue factor [11, 12]. These molecules may lead to tissue and endothelial cell damage through cytotoxic effects, can inhibit the anticoagulant and fibrinolytic pathways, and can enhance activation of platelets and the tissue factor (extrinsic) coagulation pathway as shown in the various following mechanisms: 1) MBP and ECP neutralize negatively charged heparan-sulphate and exogenous heparin that bind to antithrombin by themselves or stimulating platelet factor 4 release, leading to failure to hinder factor X activation and thrombin generation [24, 25]; 2) MBP, ECP and EPO block anionic thrombomodulin that mediates thrombin dependent-activation of protein C with inhibitory effects on factor V and factor VIII [26, 27]; 3) MBP, ECP and EPO inhibit factor XII that can activate fibrinolysis [28]; 4) Eosinophils produce platelet-activating factor [29] and activate platelets along with MBP and EPO as strong platelet agonists [30]; 5) Eosinophils release tissue factor that activates factor X via factor VII activation and can stimulate tissue factor expression of endothelial cells via EPO [31]; 6) Eosinophils express CD40 ligand and contribute to initiation and progression of thrombosis [32]. In our infant, the development of PVT in the situation without UVC may be a result of the common intersection of multiple factors including hypereosinophilia, the immature hemostatic system of preterm newborn susceptible to thromboembolism [15], and hemodynamic changes by the adjacent ductus venosus involution after birth [16]. The initial eosinophilia before oral feeding may be from congenital conditions including immune responses to foreign antigens such as CMP, leading to sensitization in utero. The postnatal exposure to CMP may cause the reactive eosinophilia to be prolonged and more severe. During the period of hypereosinophilia, the FPIAP and PVT findings improved solely with CMP avoidance and conservative management (Table 1). This suggests that the eosinophilia in this case may have limited or complementary roles on the pathophysiologies of FPIAP and PVT, as part of the background environment related to symptom development of these disorders.

In numerous prior reports, venous and/or arterial thromboembolism is found associated with peripheral blood eosinophilia, mostly hypereosinophilia that shows abnormally high eosinophil counts and lasts for longer than 6 months, in a variety of disorders including idiopathic hypereosinophilia without organ damage, hypereosinophilic syndrome, Churg-Strauss syndrome and parasitic diseases [10,11,12]. Transient eosinophilia less than 6 months of duration has also been reported related to venous thromboembolism presenting with multivessel involvement including portal venous system in teen-aged and adult patients [13, 14, 33,34,35]. The hypereosinophilia of these patients was idiopathic (without a primary cause) or secondary to conditions leading to eosinophilia, ranged from 1600 to 9350 cells/mm3 of absolute eosinophil counts, and was largely associated with thrombocytopenia, remitting with resolved thrombi after multimodal treatments including anticoagulants, thrombolytics, and corticosteroids [13, 14, 33,34,35]. The current case is the first reported newborn case and precisely depicted alterations of the eosinophilia and the portal venous thrombus during the disease course (Table 1) representing a natural course of PVT and hypereosinophilia in a premature infant with conservative management. However, in our case, the lack of data on inherited or acquired thrombophilic risk factors including protein C and S deficiencies, factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin G20210A mutation and fibrinogen receptor mutation (PLA2 polymorphism of the platelet membrane glycoprotein IIIa gene) should be considered in data interpretation. For the development of neonatal venous thromboembolism with multifactorial etiology, inherited thrombophilia is a serious risk factor, which, however, weighs less heavily on the prothrombotic scale than clinical factors [36]. Previous studies have shown extremely low thrombotic risk in otherwise healthy children with a single identified thrombophilic defect, no difference in the prevalence of inherited thrombophilia between neonates with venous thromboembolism and the healthy population [36], and the presence of two and greater genetic defects with protein S deficiency as a leading cause of recurrent venous thromboembolism [37].

Consequently this case suggests that in the setting of hypereosinophilia with a prolonged duration in premature neonates, FPIAP should be suspected in case of hematochezia in otherwise healthy infants, and considering the increased thrombotic risk by the prolonged hypereosinophilia and premature newborn status, evaluation for neonatal thrombosis may be needed, including PVT with the potential risk for the more serious, but uncommon, late complications encompassing portal hypertension.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.



Cow’s milk allergy


Cow’s milk protein


Food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis


Immunoglobulin E


Portal vein thrombosis


Umbilical venous catheterization


  1. Sullivan SE, Calhoun DA. Eosinophilia in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Perinatol. 2000;27:603–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Juul SE, Haynes JW, McPherson RJ. Evaluation of eosinophilia in hospitalized preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2005;25:182–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yen JM, Lin CH, Yang MM, Hou ST, Lin AH, Lin YJ. Eosinophilia in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Neonatol. 2010;51:116–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilia. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1592–600.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Valent P. Pathogenesis, classification, and therapy of eosinophilia and eosinophil disorders. Blood Rev. 2009;23:157–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuang FL. Approach to patients with eosinophilia. Med Clin North Am. 2020;104:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsen RL, Savage NM. How I investigate eosinophilia. Int J Lab Hematol. 2019;41:153–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wahidi LS, Sherman J, Miller MM, Zaghouani H, Sherman MP. Early persistent blood eosinophilia in necrotizing enterocolitis is a predictor of late complications. Neonatology. 2015;108:137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Calbi M, Giacchetti L. Low breast milk IgA and high blood eosinophil count in breast-fed newborns determine higher risk for developing atopic eczema after an 18-month follow-up. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 1998;8:161–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Meng X, Feng J, Zhou X, Zhu H. Hypereosinophilia with concurrent venous thromboembolism: clinical features, potential risk factors, and short-term outcomes in a Chinese cohort. Sci Rep. 2020;10:8359.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maino A, Rossio R, Cugno M, Marzano AV, Tedeschi A. Hypereosinophilic syndrome, Churg-Strauss syndrome and parasitic diseases: possible links between eosinophilia and thrombosis. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2012;10:670–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ames PR, Aloj G, Gentile F. Eosinophilia and thrombosis in parasitic diseases: an overview. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011;17:33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ames PR. Recurrent abdominal thrombosis despite heparin thromboprophylaxis in a patient with transient eosinophilia. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011;17:229–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sano H, Fukuoka T, Maruyama H, Hayashi T, Tanahashi N. Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in a patient with transient eosinophilia. Intern Med. 2014;53:2139–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenet G, Cohen O, Bajorat T, Nowak-Göttl U. Insights into neonatal thrombosis. Thromb Res. 2019;181:S33–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubbink-Verheij GH, Visser R, Roest AA, van Ommen CH, Te Pas AB, Lopriore E. Thrombosis after umbilical venous catheterisation: prospective study with serial ultrasound. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020;105:299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morag I, Epelman M, Daneman A, Moineddin R, Parvez B, Shechter T, et al. Portal vein thrombosis in the neonate: risk factors, course, and outcome. J Pediatr. 2006;148:735–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cetinkaya PG, Kahveci M, Karaatmaca B, Esenboga S, Sahiner UM, Sekerel BE, et al. Predictors for late tolerance development in food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2020;41:e11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin VM, Virkud YV, Seay H, Hickey A, Ndahayo R, Rosow R, et al. Prospective assessment of pediatrician-diagnosed food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis by gross or occult blood. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8:1692–9.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams S, Chan AK. Neonatal portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and management. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;16:329–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cabannes M, Bouissou A, Favrais G, Sembély-Taveau C, Morales L, Favreau A, et al. Systematic ultrasound examinations in neonates admitted to NICU: evolution of portal vein thrombosis. J Perinatol. 2018;38:1359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhatt MD, Patel V, Butt ML, Chan AKC, Paes B. Thrombosis and hemostasis in newborns (THiN) group. Outcomes following neonatal portal vein thrombosis: a descriptive, single-center study and review of anticoagulant therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66:e27572.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jo J, Garssen J, Knippels L, Sandalova E. Role of cellular immunity in cow's milk allergy: pathogenesis, tolerance induction, and beyond. Mediat Inflamm. 2014;2014:249784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fredens K, Dahl R, Venge P. In vitro studies of the interaction between heparin and eosinophil cationic protein. Allergy. 1991;46:27–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rucinski B, Niewiarowski S, Strzyzewski M, Holt JC, Mayo KH. Human platelet factor 4 and its C-terminal peptides: heparin binding and clearance from the circulation. Thromb Haemost. 1990;63:493–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Slungaard A, Vercellotti GM, Tran T, Gleich GJ, Key NS. Eosinophil cationic granule proteins impair thrombomodulin function. A potential mechanism for thromboembolism in hypereosinophilic heart disease. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:1721–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mukai HY, Ninomiya H, Ohtani K, Nagasawa T, Abe T. Major basic protein binding to thrombomodulin potentially contributes to the thrombosis in patients with eosinophilia. Br J Haematol. 1995;90:892–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Levi M, Hack CE, de Boer JP, Brandjes DP, Büller HR, ten Cate JW. Reduction of contact activation related fibrinolytic activity in factor XII deficient patients. Further evidence for the role of the contact system in fibrinolysis in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:1155–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ojima-Uchiyama A, Masuzawa Y, Sugiura T, Waku K, Fukuda T, Makino S. Production of platelet-activating factor by human normodense and hypodense eosinophils. Lipids. 1991;26:1200–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rohrbach MS, Wheatley CL, Slifman NR, Gleich GJ. Activation of platelets by eosinophil granule proteins. J Exp Med. 1990;172:1271–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moosbauer C, Morgenstern E, Cuvelier SL, Manukyan D, Bidzhekov K, Albrecht S, et al. Eosinophils are a major intravascular location for tissue factor storage and exposure. Blood. 2007;109:995–1002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Santilli F, Basili S, Ferroni P, Davì G. CD40/CD40L system and vascular disease. Intern Emerg Med. 2007;2:256–68.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Monterrubio Villar J, Córdoba López A, Macayo Sánchez AJ. Idiopathic eosinophilia associated with portal vein and massive thrombosis: successful thrombolysis with streptokinase. Med Sci Monit. 2006;12:CS53–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mates M, Nesher G, Roth B, Rosenberg R, Heyd J, Hershko C. Transient severe eosinophilia precipitating massive venous thrombosis in a patient with hereditary thrombophilia. Acta Haematol. 2004;112:209–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. An HS, Baek JS, Kwon BS, Kim GB, Bae EJ, Noh CI, et al. A case of pulmonary thromboembolism associated with hypereosinophilia in a child. Korean Circ J. 2009;39:382–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Haley KM. Neonatal venous thromboembolism. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Makatsariya A, Bitsadze V, Khizroeva J, Vorobev A, Makatsariya N, Egorova E, et al. Neonatal thrombosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020:1–9.

Download references


Not applicable.


The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conceptualization: HSL and THK; Investigation: HSL; Data curation: HSL and CJM; Writing-original draft preparation: CJM; Writing-review and editing: HSL. All authors have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approved it for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun-Seung Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of CHA Gangnam Medical Center (IRB No. GCI 2020–05-009). The patient’s legal guardian provided written informed consent for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s mother for publication of this case report and accompanying images. The mother gave us full permission for the materials to appear in the print and online, and grant permission to third parties to reproduce this material.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moon, CJ., Kwon, T.H. & Lee, HS. Portal vein thrombosis and food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis in a premature newborn with hypereosinophilia: a case report. BMC Pediatr 21, 49 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Eosinophilia
  • Food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis
  • Portal vein thrombosis
  • Premature newborn
  • Case report