Skip to main content

Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator as bridging to ICD in pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with myocardial bridging – a case report

Abstract

Background

There is only limited experience with wearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCD) in pediatric patients. We report on the successful application of a WCD in an adolescent patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and myocardial bridging.

Case presentation

A 15-year-old girl presented with a history of recurrent syncope, dyspnea, and vertigo with exercise. Diagnostic work-up revealed non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and signs of myocardial ischemia with exercise. Given this high-risk constellation, the patient was scheduled for prophylactic implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). One month after initial presentation and days prior to the planned ICD implantation, the patient collapsed during an episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) while running. VT was terminated by WCD shock delivery. Following this event, computerized tomography scan revealed myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery causing a 90% stenosis in systole. After coronary surgery, life threatening arrhythmias have not recurred, but due to progressive heart failure, the patient underwent successful heart transplantation after 2 years.

Conclusions

The reported case highlights the importance and applicability of WCDs and the potentially malign nature of myocardial bridging in pediatric high-risk patients.

Peer Review reports

Table of contents summary

An adolescent girl suffering from HCM and myocardial bridging of the LAD causing a 90% stenosis during systole was effectively defibrillated by a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) represent a well established treatment option for patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). Data supporting the efficacy in preventing SCD by ICDs have been shown by several randomized-controlled studies [1,2,3,4]. However, there are clinical scenarios where the use of an ICD is temporarily not feasible or implantation criteria are not yet met. The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is a temporary non-invasive device used for prevention of SCD in presumed high-risk patients suffering from potentially reversible conditions and may be used when implantation criteria for an ICD are not met [5]. Data on the use of WCDs as bridging to ICD implantation in high-risk pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are limited. We report on the use of a WCD in a 15-year-old girl suffering from ventricular tachycardia (VT) due to myocardial bridging and non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Case presentation

A 15-year-old girl presented a history of recurrent syncope, dyspnea and dizziness. Echocardiography revealed a non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with a septal thickness of 25 mm (z-score + 17) and impaired diastolic function. Repeated Holter ECG monitoring revealed no life threatening arrhythmias. The patient was started on beta-blockers (metoprolol). Risk stratification was performed according to the 2014 ESC guidelines [6] estimating a 5-year risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) of 7%, indicating that an ICD should be considered. Throughout the process of finalizing diagnostic work-up and decision making, we instructed the girl for meticulous use of a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (LifeVest, ZOLL, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA). Further work-up included genetic testing, revealing a TNNC-1 gene mutation known to be related to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [7]. However, family history was unremarkable in regard to sudden cardiac death or cardiomyopathy. Exercise testing (bicycle ergometer) resulted in angina symptoms and ST-segment depression in the left precordial leads, leading to a maximum performance of 1.2 W/kg. Symptoms resolved quickly after discontinuing exercise. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and late gadolinium enhancement revealed areas of lower perfusion and fibrosis. The patient was scheduled for implantation of an ICD system given her high-risk constellation. Five days prior to the scheduled ICD implantation, after wearing the WCD for 6 weeks, the patient was admitted after experiencing another syncope with successful termination of a sustained VT by the WCD. During that episode she was running a very short distance to catch the school bus but then collapsed inside the crowded vehicle. After shock delivery by the WCD she recovered very quickly and was admitted to the hospital completely uncompromised. The ECG documented by LifeVest revealed severe ischemic changes right before initiation of ventricular tachycardia. Figure 1 shows VT and shock delivery by the WCD on the ECG tracing obtained by LifeVest. The ischemic changes (Fig. 2) prompted a computerized tomography (CT) scan of the coronary arteries. Subsequent coronary angiography revealed myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) causing a 90% stenosis in systole (Fig. 3 shows a 3D reconstruction from the CT scan). The patient underwent surgical unroofing of the LAD and a left internal mammarian bypass proximal to the bridged LAD was performed. Due to sustained VT, low cardiac output and low perfusion of the distal portion of LAD, a venous bypass distally to the bridged artery was performed during the same session. Postoperatively she needed 3 days of mechanical cardiac support and recovered slowly. Finally, an ICD was implanted. Following the single event of VT, life threatening arrhythmias have not recurred. Due to progressive restrictive heart failure and increasing severe angina symptoms following occlusion of the left mammarian artery bypass, she successfully underwent heart transplantation 2 years after her first event.

Fig. 1
figure1

Sudden onset polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. After 30 s the LifeVest delivered an appropriate shock, converting ventricular tachycardia into sinus rhythm

Fig. 2
figure2

Sinus tachycardia (160 bpm) with ST-segment depression consistent with myocardial ischemia, which was then followed by sudden onset polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Fig. 3
figure3

Three dimensional reconstruction of the computerized tomography scan and angiography depicting myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery

Discussion and conclusions

The American Heart Association released guidelines on the indications of WCDs in 2016 [8]. WCD use was approved by the FDA in 2015 for children with a minimum weight of 42 pounds and a minimum chest circumference of 26 in., resembling an 8 year-old. Currently, LifeVest (ZOLL, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA) is the only WCD approved for clinical use. It has built-in electrodes for rhythm sensing, and pads to deliver a shock if necessary [9, 10]. In certain situations, when criteria for an implantable ICD are not entirely met and/or a transient risk for SCD exists, the WCD system represents a non-invasive but potentially life-saving treatment option. This is of particular interest in the pediatric age group, where criteria for ICD implantation are often not fulfilled and/or improvements of the condition is expected. Data on the use of WCDs in pediatric patients still remain scarce and additional evidence on the use of WCDs in pediatric patients is warranted. In addition, risk stratification for SCD was established in the adult population [11], while risk stratification for SCD in the younger pediatric population is less well validated. Thus, WCD indications might be applied less rigidly in children below 16 years of age when compared to adults. By applying the above mentioned adult risk stratification [11] to our adolescent patient, we found our patient to have an indication for an ICD and chose the WCD system as a protective bridge to ICD implantation.

Acceptance of treatment, by patients and parents, is an important factor and is probably higher for WCDs than for ICDs or subcutaneous cardioverter defibrillators (SICDs). Furthermore, ICDs show relatively high rates of complications in pediatric patients, most commonly related to lead problems which potentially have significant impact on the patient’s quality of life [12, 13]. Acceptance of treatment and comfort when waring the WCD system seems of outmost importance considering that the longest possible wearing time per day must be achieved in order to obtain maximum efficiency. WCD systems seem to be highly effective in terminating VT/VF in pediatric patients and inappropriate shock deliveries are infrequently observed [5].

Myocardial bridging is considered a benign variation of coronary development present in about 25% of the population. However, it may cause severe cardiac conditions, especially with underlying heart disease [14]. In HCM, signs of myocardial ischemia should trigger evaluation for myocardial bridging as a potentially treatable cause, and due to the risk of SCD, WCD use should be considered as a transient treatment option until surgical relief is performed. In our case, ischemic findings on the WCD tracing prior to shock delivery helped establish the diagnosis of myocardial bridging.

In conclusion, this case reports on the use of WCD as a bridge to ICD in a high-risk pediatric patient with HCM and myocardial bridging. The WCD allowed for primary protection from SCD while awaiting further diagnostic work-up.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ICD:

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

HCM:

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

FDA:

Food and drug administration

LAD:

Left anterior descending coronary artery

SCD:

Sudden cardiac death

SICD:

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator

WCD:

Wearable cardioverter defibrillator

References

  1. 1.

    Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:225–37..

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kadish A, Dyer A, Daubert JP, Quigg R, Estes NA, Anderson KP, et al. Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2151–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the task force for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the Europe. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2793–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Spar DS, Bianco NR, Knilans TK, Czosek RJ, Anderson JB. The US experience of the wearable Cardioverter-defibrillator in pediatric patients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e006163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the task force for the Management of Patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Europace. 2015;17:1601–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wolf CM. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: genetics and clinical perspectives. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019;9(Suppl 2):S388–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Piccini JP Sr, Allen LA, Kudenchuk PJ, Page RL, Patel MR, Turakhia MP, American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Wearable Cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133:1715–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Reek S, Burri H, Roberts PR, Perings C, Epstein AE, Klein HU, et al. The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: current technology and evolving indications. Europace. 2017;19:335–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Berul CI, Van Hare GF, Kertesz NJ, Dubin AM, Cecchin F, Collins KK, et al. Results of a multicenter retrospective implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry of pediatric and congenital heart disease patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1685–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Deyell MW, Krahn AD, Goldberger JJ. Sudden cardiac death risk stratification. Circ Res. 2015;116:1907–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Atallah J, Erickson CC, Cecchin F, Dubin AM, Law IH, Cohen MI, et al. Multi-institutional study of implantable defibrillator Lead performance in children and young adults: results of the pediatric Lead extractability and survival evaluation (PLEASE) study. Circulation. 2013;127:2393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Czosek RJ, Cassedy AE, Wray J, Wernovsky G, Newburger JW, Mussatto KA, et al. Quality of life in pediatric patients affected by electrophysiologic disease. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:899–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kiess A, Vollroth M, Bakhtiary F, Seki H, Kostelka M, Djukic M, et al. Symptomatic myocardial bridging: a frequently occurring coronary variation can cause severe myocardial ischaemia in affected children with underlying cardiac conditions. Cardiol Young. 2018;28:826–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to or advised on patient care. SKK was primarily responsible for the treatment. AB and MK drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. SKK, HS, DS, EB, and IK critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Sallmon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient/guardian/parent. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

Hannes Sallmon is an Associate Editor of BMC Pediatrics.

We declare no conflict of interest and no relationship with industry.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurath-Koller, S., Sallmon, H., Scherr, D. et al. Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator as bridging to ICD in pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with myocardial bridging – a case report. BMC Pediatr 20, 207 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02113-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • LifeVest
  • Ventricular tachycardia
  • Myocardial bridging