Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Parental smoking and blood pressure in children and adolescents: a national cross-sectional study in China

Abstract

Background

Current evidence on the health effects of passive smoking on childhood blood pressure is limited and inconsistent. We investigated the associations between exposure to parental smoking and blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis was performed in a national sample of 42,745 children and adolescents (50.2% boys) aged 7–18 years from seven provinces in China. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Information on parental smoking was collected through questionnaire. Multivariable linear regression and logistic regression was used to investigate the associations of parental smoking with blood pressure and prevalent hypertension, respectively.

Results

The reported parental smoking rates were 49.7 and 50.2% in boys and girls, respectively. After adjustment for a range of potential confounders, exposure to parental smoking was associated with 0.44 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16, 0.72] mmHg and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.47) mmHg higher SBP and DBP in girls. Girls exposed to parental smoking were also more likely to have hypertension compared with those without exposure (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.20). No significant associations were found in boys.

Conclusions

Exposure to parental smoking was associated with increased blood pressure and higher prevalence of hypertension in girls, but not in boys. Urgent strategies are needed for the promotion of smoking-free environment, especially for children and adolescents.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hypertension is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerosis, which is the underlying pathology of most cardiovascular diseases [1]. There is evidence showing that blood pressure tracks well from childhood to adulthood and elevated blood pressure in childhood is a good predictor of adult hypertension [2]. Consistent associations have also been shown between elevated blood pressure in childhood and impaired cardiovascular function in adulthood [3]. The blood pressure development in childhood and its tracking into adulthood is affected by various factors, including genetics, biology, behavior and social and environment factors [4,5,6].

Cigarette smoking is a major source of indoor air pollution. Side-stream cigarette smoke contains similar adverse components as mainstream cigarette smoke, and the concentrations of some chemicals may be even higher in side-stream smoke than in mainstream smoke [7]. Children are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of air toxicants, such as second-hand smoke, because of the underdeveloped lungs and greater exposure due to higher ventilation rate [8]. In recent years, a number of epidemiological studies investigated the associations between passive smoking, mainly due to parental smoking, and blood pressure in children and adolescents, but the results are inconsistent [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Moreover, the majority of these studies were conducted among Western populations and there is limited evidence in China. China is among the countries with highest prevalence of smoking and the smoking rate is especially high for Chinese men [18]. On the other hand, hypertension causes a substantial disease burden in China. In 2010, more than 2 million death were attributable to hypertension, accounting for 24.6% deaths in China [19]. Investigation on the health effects of parental smoking on childhood blood pressure may provide important evidence to aid the development of effective intervention strategies to control smoking and consequently to improve children’s cardiovascular health. We therefore assessed the associations between exposure to parental smoking and blood pressure and hypertension in a large population of Chinese children and adolescents.

Methods

Study participants

Study participants were from a national project in China which aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention program on obesity prevention in children and adolescents. Details of the project have been documented elsewhere [20, 21]. In brief, more than 60,000 children and adolescents aged 7–18 years were recruited from seven provinces in China (Chongqing, Hunan, Guangdong, Liaoning, Ningxia, Shanghai and Tianjin) in 2013 through a multi-stage random sampling. Participants received a series of physical examinations, blood tests as well as a questionnaire investigation. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Peking University and written informed consent was obtained from the participants and their guardians prior to their participation.

In the present study, we performed a cross-sectional analysis using baseline data of the project. Blood pressure measures were available for 599,59 children and adolescents. We excluded 16,732 participants with missing information on parental smoking and some other potential confounders (e.g. lifestyle and maternal educational level). We further excluded 482 participants who reported smoking behaviors to eliminate possible influences of active smoking. Finally, 42,745 participants (50.2% boys) were included in the data analysis.

Data collection

Participants underwent a series of anthropometric measurements in the morning, including height, weight and blood pressure. Barefoot height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a portable stadiometer (Model TZG, China). Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a standardized scale with participants wearing light clothing. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m). Blood pressure was measured using an auscultation mercury sphygmomanometer (Model XJ1ID, China) with an appropriate cuff for children. Blood pressure measurement was performed after at least 5-min rest with participants in seated position. The cuff was placed around 2 cm above the crease of the right arm elbow. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was determined by onset of the first Korotkoff sound (K1) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was determined by the fifth Korotkoff sound (K5). Blood pressure was measured twice with 1-min interval and children were asked to remain quiet and to sit still while each reading was being taken. The average of the two readings was calculated and then used in data analysis. All measurements were carried out by trained technicians. The equipment was calibrated regularly and the information on detailed procedures of quality control can be assessed in our published study protocol [20].

A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect information on participants` demographic information and lifestyle factors, such as exercise and diet. Information on parental smoking, parental education and family disease history was collected by a parental questionnaire. The smoking rate (current smoking) reported in the present study was much higher in fathers (49.7%) than in mothers (1.3%). Thus, we categorized parental smoking into two groups: non-exposure group (neither of the parent smoked) and exposure group (at least one parent smoked).

Statistical analysis

Mean [standard deviation (SD)] and number (percentage) were used for descriptive statistics. Between-group comparisons were conducted using T test, chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis rank test when appropriate. We used multivariable linear regression models to investigate the associations between exposure to parental smoking and blood pressure. We developed three models with potential confounders being added gradually, including: Crude Model: with no adjustment; Model 1: adjusted by age, height and BMI (all as continuous variables); Model 2: further adjusted by outdoor exercise (< 1 h/day, 1–2 h/day or ≥ 2 h/day), fruit intake (≤ 3 days/week, 4–6 days/week or daily), vegetable intake (≤ 3 days/week, 4–6 days/week or daily), maternal educational level (primary school or illiterate, secondary school, high school, or college/university or above) and parental hypertension (yes or no). All analyses were performed separately for boys and girls.

Logistic regression was used to examine the associations between parental smoking and prevalent hypertension. Hypertension was defined according to the national references for Chinese children and adolescents aged 7–17 years (SBP or DBP ≥ age, sex-and-height specific 95th percentiles) [21]. For participants aged 18 years, the cut-offs of 140/90 for adults were used.

We conducted a sensitivity analysis to control the possible influence of active smoking. We included the 482 participants who were previously excluded because of reported active smoking behaviors and introduced active smoking (yes or no) as a covariate into the regression models. We also performed a subgroup analysis by classifying the study participants into two groups: younger group (7–12 years of age) and older group (13–18 years of age). Active smoking is rare in younger children, and therefore findings from this group would be less likely to be affected by active smoking.

All statistical analyses were performed using R 3.4.3 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). A two-tailed P value of < 0.05 defined statistical significance.

Results

General characteristics of the 21,463 boys and 21,282 girls included in data analysis are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 11.1 (SD: 3.1) years and 11.5 (SD: 3.2) years for boys and girls, respectively. Compared with girls, boys had greater values of all anthropometric measures. The prevalence of hypertension was also slightly higher in boys (13.6%) than in girls (12.8%). Boys were physically more active than girls. The distribution of parental smoking and maternal educational level was similar among boys and girls. The 42,745 participants included in data analysis were generally comparable with the whole study population in terms of the distribution of age, sex and anthropometric measures (Additional file 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants

Table 2 shows the results of the associations between parental smoking and blood pressure from linear regression analysis. Positive associations between parental smoking and blood pressure were found in girls and the associations were stable after adjustment for a range of confounders. In fully adjusted model (Model 3), in comparison with girls without exposure to parental smoking, those in exposure group had 0.44 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16,0.72] mmHg and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.04,0.47) mmHg higher SBP and DBP, respectively. No significant associations between parental smoking and blood pressure were found in boys.

Table 2 Associations between exposure to parental smoking and blood pressure in children and adolescents

Consistent with the results of linear regression analysis, a positive association was detected between parental smoking and prevalent hypertension in girls. (Table 3)The girls with exposure to parental smoking had 1.11 higher odds of having hypertension than their counterparts without exposure [odds ratio (OR): 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.20]. Similarly, no significant associations were found in boys.

Table 3 Associations between exposure to parental smoking and hypertension in children and adolescents

In sensitivity analysis, the inclusion of participants with active smoking and additional adjustment for active smoking did not change the results materially (data not shown). In subgroup analysis, we found similar results in the younger group. Exposure to parental smoking was associated with increased blood pressure and higher prevalence of hypertension in girls, although the positive association between DBP and parental smoking did not reach statistical significance. No significant associations were found in younger boys. (Additional file 2).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the largest epidemiological study to date which investigated the associations between exposure to parental smoking and blood pressure and hypertension in Chinese children and adolescent. We found that exposure to parental smoking was associated with increased SBP and DBP and higher prevalence of hypertension in girls. No significant associations were found in boys.

Current evidence on the associations between passive smoking, mainly parental smoking, and blood pressure of children and adolescents is inconsistent and controversial. In line with our findings, Schwandt and colleagues reported that parental smoking was associated with higher prevalence of hypertension in children in 2011 child-parent pairs in Germany [11]. In another study of 4236 German preschool children, both SBP (+ 1.0, 95% CI: + 0.5, + 1.5 mmHg) and DBP (+ 0.5, 95% CI: + 0.03, + 0.9 mmHg) were higher in children of smoking parents [13]. An Iranian study of 160 children also found that parental smoking was associated with increased SBP and DBP, but the significant associations diminished in sex-specific subgroup analysis [14]. In contrast, a number of other studies found no significant associations between childhood passive smoking and blood pressure in children and/or adolescents in Poland [9], Turkey [12], Belarus [15] and Italy [17]. Two other studies in the U.S. [10] and Iran [16] found that passive smoking was associated with higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS), but not with elevated blood pressure, a single component of MS. More studies are needed to better investigate the health effects of parental smoking on blood pressure in children and adolescents, especially in regions with high smoking rate and great hypertension disease burden, such as China.

We are not sure about the underlying mechanisms responsible for the observed sex differences in the associations between parental smoking and blood pressure. One possible explanation is that girls were physically less active than boys and they might spend more time indoors (Table 1). Therefore, the exposure to passive smoking in girls could be greater. More future studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Our study has several important strengths. First, the large sample size along with the affluent information on a wide range of potential confounders enabled us to better characterize the associations between exposure to parental smoking and blood pressure/hypertension in children and adolescents. Second, blood pressure was measured using standard methods and strict quality control measures further ensured the quality of data [20].

There are also some limitations. First, the cross-sectional nature limited our ability of casual inference. Second, a proportion of participants were excluded due to incomplete information and our results may be subjective to selection bias. However, the included participants had a similar profile of demographic and anthropometric measures in comparison with the whole study population, indicating that the excluded participants were likely to be randomly distributed. Therefore, this exclusion should not seriously affect our results. Second, information on parental smoking was collected by questionnaire and no objective measurements such as blood/urinary cotinine levels were used. However, previous studies have shown a good agreement between self-reported smoking and biochemical markers both in adults and in children exposed to parental smoking [22, 23]. An additional limitation is that the questionnaire used in the present study was non-anonymous and this may have resulted in underreported active smoking rates. Consequently, it was possible that not all active smokers had been excluded and we were not able to completely rule out the influence of active smoking. However, in our subgroup analysis, we found similar results in the younger students, which were less likely to be affected by active smoking. Therefore, our overall findings on the adverse effects of parental smoking on blood pressure should not be seriously affected.

Conclusions

In conclusion, in this large national sample of Chinese children and adolescents, exposure to parental smoking was associated with increased blood pressure and higher prevalence of hypertension in girls but not in boys. Our findings support the urgent needs to develop effective strategies to promote smoking-free environment, especially for children and adolescents.

Abbreviations

BMI:

body mass index

CI:

confidence interval

DBP:

diastolic blood pressure

MS:

metabolic syndrome

OR:

odds ratio

SBP:

systolic blood pressure

SD:

standard deviation

References

  1. Bondjers G, Glukhova M, Hansson GK, Postnov YV, Reidy MA, Schwartz SM. Hypertension and atherosclerosis. Cause and effect, or two effects with one unknown cause? Circulation. 1991;84(6 Suppl):VI2–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen X, Wang Y. Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Circulation. 2008;117(25):3171–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Magnussen CG, Smith KJ, Juonala M. When to prevent cardiovascular disease? As early as possible: lessons from prospective cohorts beginning in childhood. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013;28(5):561–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelder SH, Osganian SK, Feldman HA, et al. Tracking of physical and physiological risk variables among ethnic subgroups from third to eighth grade: the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health cohort study. Prev Med. 2002;34(3):324–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dekkers JC, Snieder H, Van Den Oord EJ, Treiber FA. Moderators of blood pressure development from childhood to adulthood: a 10-year longitudinal study. J Pediatr. 2002;141(6):770–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kivimaki M, Lawlor DA, Smith GD, et al. Early socioeconomic position and blood pressure in childhood and adulthood: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Hypertension. 2006;47(1):39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Research Council (US). Environmental tobacco smoke: measuring exposures and assessing health effects. National Academies Press; 1986.

  8. American Academy of Pediatrics Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Policy statement: organizational principles to guide and define the child health care system and/or improve the health of all children. Pediatrics. 2004;113(5 Suppl):1545–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pijanowska M, Zajaczkowska M. Passive smoking and patterns of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in healthy children. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2004;16(94):320–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weitzman M, Cook S, Auinger P, et al. Tobacco smoke exposure is associated with the metabolic syndrome in adolescents. Circulation. 2005;112(6):862–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwandt P, Haas GM, Liepold E. Lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors in 2001 child-parent pairs: the PEP family heart study. Atherosclerosis. 2010;213(2):642–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agirbasli M, Tanrikulu B, Arikan S, et al. Trends in body mass index, blood pressure and parental smoking habits in middle socio-economic level Turkish adolescents. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22(1):12–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simonetti GD, Schwertz R, Klett M, Hoffmann GF, Schaefer F, Wuhl E. Determinants of blood pressure in preschool children: the role of parental smoking. Circulation. 2011;123(3):292–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seyedzadeh A, Hashemi F, Soleimani A. Relationship between blood pressure and passive smoking in elementary school children. Iran J Pediatr. 2012;22(3):351–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang S, Decker A, Kramer MS. Exposure to parental smoking and child growth and development: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:104–2431-13-104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelishadi R, Noori A, Qorbani M, et al. Are active and passive smoking associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents? The CASPIAN-III study. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2016:1–8.

  17. Brambilla P, Bedogni G, Pietrobelli A, Cianfarani S, Agostoni C. Predictors of blood pressure at 7-13 years: the "new millennium baby" study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;26(8):706–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. Prevalence of tobacco use. http://www.who.int/gho/tobacco/use/en/. Accessed Aug 2018. Updated 2012.

  19. National Center for Cardiovascular Disease of China. Report on Cardiovascular Disease in China. 2015. http://www.nccd.org.cn/News/Columns/Index/1089. Accessed Sep 2018. Updated 2015.

  20. Chen Y, Ma L, Ma Y, et al. A national school-based health lifestyles interventions among Chinese children and adolescents against obesity: rationale, design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial in China. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:210–015-1516-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dong Y, Ma J, Song Y, et al. National Blood Pressure Reference for Chinese Han children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years. Hypertension. 2017;70(5):897–906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong SL, Shields M, Leatherdale S, Malaison E, Hammond D. Assessment of validity of self-reported smoking status. Health Rep. 2012;23(1):47–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(7):1086–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participants and their guardians for their participation.

Funding

This study was supported by the Research Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry of Health of the Ministry of Health of China (201202010). Bin Dong was supported by the Excellent Talents Fund Program of Peking University Health Science Center (BMU2017YJ002). The funding bodies had no role in the study design; data collection, analysis and interpretation; and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact the corresponding authors for data requests.

Authors` contributions

JM and YHM designed the study and acquired the data; ZZ performed data analysis; ZZ and BD interpreted the results; ZZ drafted the manuscript, with input from ZW, YD and ZY; all authors took part in the critical revision of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bin Dong or Yinghua Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from the participants and their parents/guardians prior to their participation. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Peking University (Reference No.: IRB0000105213034).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests related to this manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Characteristics of all participants and those included in data analysis. (DOCX 15 kb)

Additional file 2:

Associations between exposure to parental smoking and blood pressure and hypertension in subgroup analysis. (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Ma, J., Wang, Z. et al. Parental smoking and blood pressure in children and adolescents: a national cross-sectional study in China. BMC Pediatr 19, 116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1505-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1505-8

Keywords