Skip to main content

Letter to the editor: clarifying some aspects and the terminology of individualized human milk fortification

Abstract

This letter has been written by the components of the European Milk Bank Association (EMBA) Working Group on Human Milk Fortification in response to a recent paper published by Mathes et al. (BMC Pediatr. 2018 May 8;18(1):154) with the aim of drawing attention to the importance of the use of a metabolic marker to adapt protein intake in preterm infants. EMBA Working Group on Human Milk Fortification clarifies further the terminology and some specific aspects regarding individualized human milk fortification. There are two types of individualized human milk fortification: Adjustable human milk fortification and Targeted human milk fortification. Advantages and disadvantages of these methods are summarized.

Peer Review reports

Dear Editor,

We read with great interest the paper from Mathes et al. [1] which underlines the importance of monitoring plasma and urinary urea to adapt enteral protein intake in preterm infants. The authors aimed to obtain a practical non-invasively measured metabolic marker reflecting the short term protein intake of preterm infants. They showed that higher-protein group infants had higher plasma and urinary urea concentrations compared to lower-protein group. It is noteworthy that the authors demonstrated a highly positive correlation between plasma urea concentrations and the urinary urea-creatinine-ratio, and between actual protein intakes and plasma urea concentrations and the urinary urea-creatinine-ratio. They concluded that urinary urea to creatinine ratio might help to estimate actual protein intake in these well thriving infants.

We appreciate the attempt of Mathes et al. [1] to search for a non-invasive metabolic marker on which individualization of human milk (HM) fortification could be based. Methods employed to individualize fortification of milk fed to preterm infants should continue and adjusting protein fortification on the basis of urinary urea-creatinine ratio warrants further investigation in relation with other outcomes such as growth.

On the other hand we would like to remind them that there is a type of individualized HM fortification method, namely “adjustable fortification,” proposed in 2006 and comprises twice weekly assessments of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) as a marker of protein intake [2]. This method has been shown to be effective in improving protein intake and postnatal growth (weight gain and head circumference) in VLBW infants in the original randomized controlled trial [2] and the results have been replicated by the following observational studies [3, 4].

We are also aware that there is some confusion regarding the terminology around individualized human milk fortification, as we noticed previously [5, 6]. Therefore we are taking the opportunity to clarify this. As clearly defined in 2010 [7], there are two types of individualized fortification (Table 1): 1) Adjustable Fortification-based on regular BUN assessments; 2) Targeted Fortification- based on the macronutrient analysis of human milk.

Table 1 Individualized Human Milk Fortification Methods [7]

The nutrient and energy requirements stated in the international recommendations refer to the populations not individuals. We know that some infants will require more than the recommended intakes and some less. To find out how much protein an individual infant requires it is important to monitor the physiological response of each baby to the amount received and respond accordingly. In addition, protein and energy requirements may be particularly high in subgroups of infants for example those with bronchopulmonary dysplasia or extra-uterine growth restriction. Therefore fortification of HM should be adapted to specific nutrient needs of each individual infant. Adjustable human milk fortification in this sense is a good compromise

European Milk Bank Association (EMBA) Working Group on Human Milk Fortification

Authors’ Response to Letter-to-the-Editor (Clarifying some aspects and the terminology of individualized human milk fortification)

We greatly appreciate the clarification by the colleagues from the European Milk Bank Association and we agree to their comments.

According to the data we were able to present in our original article (Ref [1]), it seems that instead of measuring BUN twice weekly, measuring urinary urea or urinary urea/creatinine ratio may prove similarly effective to guide adjustable fortification of human milk in very preterm infants.

Abbreviations

ADJ:

Adjustable

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

EMBA:

European Milk Bank Association

HM:

Human milk

References

  1. 1.

    Mathes M, Maas C, Bleeker C, Vek J, Bernhard W, Peter A, Poets CF, Franz AR. Effect of increased enteral protein intake on plasma and urinary urea concentrations in preterm infants born at < 32 weeks gestation and < 1500 g birth weight enrolled in a randomized controlled trial-a secondary analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1136-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Arslanoglu S, Moro GE, Ziegler EE. Adjustable fortification of human milk fed to preterm infants: does it make a difference? J Perinatol. 2006;26(10):614–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Picaud JC, Houeto N, Buffin R, Loys CM, Godbert I, Haÿs S. Additional Protein Fortification Is Necessary in Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants Fed Human Milk. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;63(1):103–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alan S, Atasay B, Cakir U, Yildiz D, Kilic A, Kahvecioglu D, Erdeve O, Arsan S. An intention to achieve better postnatal in-hospital-growth for preterm infants: adjustable protein fortification of human milk. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89(12):1017–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mangili G, Garzoli E. Feeding of preterm infants and fortification of breast milk. Pediatr Med Chir. 2017;39(2):158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    DiLauro S, Unger S, Stone D, O'Connor DL. Human Milk for Ill and Medically Compromised Infants: Strategies and Ongoing Innovation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(6):768–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Arslanoglu S, Moro GE, Ziegler EE. The WAPM working group on nutrition Optimization of human milk fortification for preterm infants: new concepts and recommendations. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(3):233–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

All authors participated to the discussion and the preparation of the manuscript. SA, CK, and JCP revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sertac Arslanoglu.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arslanoglu, S., King, C., Boquien, CY. et al. Letter to the editor: clarifying some aspects and the terminology of individualized human milk fortification. BMC Pediatr 19, 135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1491-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Human milk fortification
  • Adjustable fortification
  • Individualized fortification
  • Preterm infants
  • Targeted fortification
  • Preterm infant feeding
  • Enteral nutrition
  • Blood urea nitrogen