Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Sensation seeking in 3- to 6-year-old children: associations with socio-demographic parameters and behavioural difficulties

BMC Pediatrics201919:77

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1450-6

  • Received: 25 October 2018
  • Accepted: 6 March 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The present study investigates whether sensation seeking in pre-school-age children is associated with age, gender and socio-economic status, and how sensation seeking relates to behavioural difficulties.

Methods

The study sample consisted of 423 three- to six-year-old children whose parents had completed questionnaires on the children’s sensation seeking (Sensation Seeking Scale for Young Children), socio-economic status, and behavioural difficulties (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire). Multiple linear regression models were applied to investigate associations between sensation seeking and age, gender, socio-economic status and behavioural difficulties.

Results

Sensation seeking was significantly higher in male vs. female children but not associated with children’s socio-economic status. Furthermore, sensation seeking was positively correlated with conduct problems, but negatively with emotional symptoms and peer-relationship problems.

Conclusion

These results replicate findings in adults and strengthen the assumption that sensation seeking is a personality trait that is already observable in early childhood. Furthermore, our results suggest relationships between higher levels of sensation seeking and externalising behaviour as well as relationships between lower levels of sensation seeking and internalising behaviour.

Trial registration

LIFE Child study: ClinicalTrials.gov, clinical trial number NCT02550236.

Keywords

  • Sensation seeking
  • Socio-economic status
  • Behavioural difficulties
  • Children

Background

Sensation seeking is a personality trait defined by the seeking of novel and intense sensations and experiences, and the willingness to take risks for the sake of such experience [1]. High sensation seekers become bored if stimuli and experiences become repetitive [2]. A positive outcome of high sensation seeking seems to be the ability to better manage stress and adversity [3].

Sensation seeking has been widely studied in adults [2, 414] and significant correlations have been found between risky behaviours, such as smoking and drug use, and aggressive behaviour. In contrast, only a little is known about sensation seeking in young children [1519]. Studies have shown that high sensation seeking in children and preadolescents is associated with greater vulnerability to unintentional injuries, substance use, rule-breaking behaviour and aggressive behavioural disorders [18, 2023]. Furthermore, sensation seeking children have been shown to exhibit a greater propensity for risk-taking play behaviour [24], including being more likely to play violent video games [23].

The present study is the first, to our knowledge, that has investigated associations between sensation seeking and age, gender, SES and behavioural problems in a sample of preschool children.

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between sensation seeking and age, gender, and the socio-economic status (SES). In adolescents and adults, age and gender have been shown to be related to sensation seeking traits [6, 9, 25]. With respect to gender, previous studies have reported higher sensation seeking in men versus women [1, 10, 12, 26, 27]. Similarly, boys (aged seven or older) were found to exhibit higher levels of sensation seeking than girls [23]. Concerning age differences, Zuckerman [28] postulated that sensation seeking is related to developmental phases. It is suggested that sensation seeking increases between childhood and adolescence, peaks between 16 and 19, and declines or stabilises in late adolescence or young adulthood [15, 16, 2932]. However, previous studies have found no, or only small, associations between sensation seeking and SES (income, education, occupational status) in adolescents and adults [9, 12, 26].

Consequently, we expected to observe more sensation seeking in boys compared to girls and greater levels of sensation seeking in older versus younger preschool children, but no relation between sensation seeking and SES.

Our second objective was to investigate associations between sensation seeking and behavioural difficulties in children. To date, very few studies have examined this relationship. Previous findings suggest an association between sensation seeking and externalising behavioural difficulties, namely conduct problems [33, 34] in children and adolescents, and hyperactivity symptoms in adults [35]. In respect to internalising problems (e.g. emotional problems), previous findings are mixed. Whereas Xu and Ortin [36, 37] observed positive associations between sensation seeking and depressive symptoms, Giannoni-Pastor [38] did not find a link between the two, and Kövi [39] observed a higher prevalence of depression in adults who exhibited lower levels of sensation seeking. Based on these findings, we hypothesised that young children who show more signs of sensation seeking might have more behavioural difficulties than children who show fewer signs of sensation seeking, especially with respect to externalising behaviours.

Methods

The LIFE child study

The data analysed in the present study were collected as part of the LIFE Child study, a large childhood cohort study conducted in Leipzig, Germany. The LIFE Child study aims to monitor healthy children from birth to adulthood to understand the development of lifestyle diseases such as diabetes, obesity, and mental disorders [40]. Depending on the children’s age, the comprehensive study program contains different medical, psychological and sociodemographic assessments as well as the collection of biological samples. The recruitment of study participants is based on a collaborative network of hospitals, public health centres, nursery schools, and schools [41]. More than 4000 children and adolescents aged between 0 and 18, and their parents, have participated since the study was initiated in 2011. The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig, Germany (Reg. No. 264–10-19,042,010).

Participants

The study sample consisted of 432 children aged between 3 and 6 who had participated in the LIFE Child study between 2012 and 2016. For each participating family, data were only included for one, randomly selected child. Nine children had to be excluded due to missing data. Thus, the final sample consisted of 423 children (51.3% male, 48.7% female, mean age = 4.7 years, range 3.5–6.5 years). Informed parental consent was provided in writing for all child participants.

Measurements

Sensation seeking scale for young children (SSSYC)

Sensation seeking was assessed using the adapted German version of the Sensation Seeking Scale for Young Children (SSSYC) [18]. This questionnaire includes 24 items in the three subcategories ‘novelty seeking’ (NS, 8 items), ‘behavioural intensity’ (BI, 6 items) and ‘thrill seeking’ (TS, 10 items). NS items measure aversion to repetition and the propensity to seek new experiences, e.g. ‘playing a game that he/she never played before’. BI items assess the desire to engage in activities involving speed or danger, e.g. ‘climbing a tree’. TS items measure the need for a variety of emotional challenges that raise excitement, e.g. ‘listening to loud, bouncy music’. For each item, parents were asked to choose which of two behaviours describes their child better, with one behaviour reflecting high sensation seeking (1 point), e.g. ‘Go down a slide fast headfirst’, and the other reflecting low sensation seeking (0 points), e.g. ‘Go down a slide feet first’. In the event that one answer was missing, the average score of the subscale was used in place of the missing value. In the event that more than one answer was missing in a single subscale, the child was excluded from the analyses. In the present sample, the internal consistency of the questionnaires’ overall score (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.76.

Socio-economic status (SES)

The participants’ SES was represented by an index (so called WSI Stratification Index) that combines information on three main indicators of SES, namely equivalent household income, parental education level, and parental occupational status [4244]. The information used to calculate these SES indicators was collected using a questionnaire that was completed by the parents. Based on their responses, each indicator was assigned a score ranging from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 points [44]. All three indicators contributed equally to the resulting points score [44]. Therefore, the minimum score for the WSI Stratification Index was 3, and the maximum score was 21. Based on this score, each family could be assigned a ‘lower’ (score between 3 and 8.40), ‘middle’ (score between 8.5 and 15.4), or ‘higher’ SES (score between 15.5 and 21) [44]. 412 parents (97.4%) provided complete information on their SES. In the present sample, 9.0% (N = 37) of the study participants belonged to the lower social milieu, 56.8% (N = 234) to the middle social milieu, and 34.2% (N = 141) to the higher social milieu.

Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ)

Behavioural problems were assessed using the parent report questionnaire from the German-language version of the SDQ [45, 46]. This standard screening instrument contains 25 items in 5 ‘scales’. The scale ‘pro-social behaviour’ is assessed as a psychological strength. In contrast, the other 4 scales, “hyperactivity/inattention’ (e.g. restlessness), ‘emotional symptoms’ (e.g. having many worries), ‘peer relationship problems’ (e.g. being picked on or bullied) and ‘conduct problems’ (e.g. often fighting with other children) are concerned with behavioural difficulties. The scores on the four problem scales are added together to produce an overall difficulties score. For each item, parents were asked to choose one of three answer categories (‘0 = not true’, ‘1 = somewhat true’ and ‘2 = certainly true’). In the normative sample, the German translation of the SDQ showed a good internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha) of 0.82 [46]. In the present study sample, the internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha) was 0.81 for the total difficulties score.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) for the SSSYC are presented for the whole sample and differentiated by gender and age. The relationship between the scores on the different SSSYC scales was estimated by calculating Pearson correlations.

Levels of association between sensation seeking and parameters of age, gender, and SES were estimated separately using multiple linear regressions with age, gender and SES (as a continuous measure ranging from 3 to 21) as independent variables and either the overall SSSYC score or the three single scale values NS, BI, TS as dependent variables. Interaction effects between SES and age/gender were assessed using a three factorial analysis of variance, with the overall SSSYC score as the dependent variable and age (4 years vs. 5 years vs. 6 years), gender (male vs. female), and SES (low vs. middle vs. high) as factorial independent variables. Possible relationships between sensation seeking and behaviour difficulties were assessed using multiple linear regressions with the SDQ single scale values as independent variables and the overall SSSYC score or the single scale values of the SSSYC as dependent variables. These associations were adjusted for age, gender, and SES. All statistical models were checked for interactions between the independent variables and age or gender.

Results

Sensation seeking in the present sample

The mean and standard deviation values for the different SSSYC subscales are shown in Table 1. The average overall score ranged from 10.51 (SD 4.34) for girls (3.5–4.4 years in age) to 13.54 (SD 3.64) for boys (5.5–6.5 years in age).
Table 1

Sensation Seeking Scale for Young Children (SSSYC): mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) values by age and gender for N = 423 children aged 3 to 6

 

SSSYC overall

NS

BI

TS

Age

Gender

N

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

all

male

217

12.52

(4.06)

3.52

(1.86)

2.98

(1.62)

6.03

(2.01)

female

206

11.24

(4.26)

3.56

(1.82)

2.84

(1.82)

4.84

(2.04)

3.5–4.4

male

111

11.85

(4.35)

3.30

(2.03)

2.85

(1.65)

5.70

(2.10)

female

92

10.51

(4.34)

3.12

(1.94)

2.76

(1.82)

4.62

(2.05)

4.5–5.4

male

57

12.95

(3.62)

3.44

(1.59)

3.13

(1.54)

6.37

(1.87)

female

51

11.47

(4.03)

3.78

(1.69)

2.73

(1.67)

4.96

(2.12)

5.5–6.5

male

49

13.54

(3.64)

4.11

(1.67)

3.07

(1.67)

6.36

(1.85)

female

63

12.14

(4.20)

4.02

(1.61)

3.05

(1.95)

5.07

(1.95)

Age in years, NS Novelty Seeking, BI Behavioural Intensity, TS Thrill Seeking

The correlations between the scores on the different SSSYC scales are positive and highly significant (all p < .001). However, the associations between BI and TS appear to be much stronger (r = .615) than the associations between BI and NS (r = .173) or between TS and NS (r = .176).

Associations between sensation seeking and parameters of age, gender, and SES

Table 2 presents the various associations identified between scores in the different SSSYC subscales and age, gender, and SES. With respect to gender, the analyses revealed significant gender differences in the overall SSSYC score (β = −.162, b = − 1.35, p = .001, see also Fig. 1). Male children were estimated to score on average 1.35 points higher than female children. Looking at the single SSSYC scales, however, only scores on the TS scale were related to gender (β = −.291, b = − 1.23, p < .001). No significant gender effects were observed in NS (β = .000, b = 0.00, p = .993) and BI (β = −.036, b = − 0.12, p = .464). These findings indicate that the boys were found to be more ‘thrill seeking’ than the girls, whereas levels of behavioural intensity and novelty seeking did not differ between boys and girls.
Table 2

Associations between scores on the different scales of the SSSYC and gender, age, and SES values

 

β

b

p

SSYC Total

Gender

−.162

−1.35

.001

Age

.169

0.82

.001

SES

.026

0.03

.596

NS

Gender

.000

0.00

.993

Age

.188

0.40

.000

SES

.043

0.02

.383

BI

Gender

−.036

−0.12

.464

Age

.069

0.13

.167

SES

.006

0.00

.905

TS

Gender

−.291

−1.23

<.001

Age

.116

0.28

.015

SES

.009

0.00

.848

NS Novelty Seeking, BI Behavioural Intensity, TS Thrill Seeking, β = standardised regression coefficient, b = non-standardised regression coefficient, level of significance p < 0.05. Socio-economic status was not found to be related to sensation seeking in children. Associations were found between age and gender values and sensation seeking, whereby male and older children tend to score higher on the sensation seeking scale

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Gender-specific effect plot illustrating the estimated overall SSSYC score (+ confidence interval) depending on age. 3- to 6-year-old boys scored higher on the overall sensation seeking scale than girls

In addition to the gender differences, the significant associations found between participant age and the overall SSSYC score (β = .169, b = 0.82, p < .001), the NS score (β = .188, b = 0.40, p < .001), and the TS score (β = .116, b = 0.28, p = .015) indicate that older children are more sensation seeking than younger children, especially with respect to thrill seeking and novelty seeking. For example, according to the statistical model, the overall SSSYC score increased by approximately 0.82 points per additional year of life. We found no significant age effect in BI (β = .069, b = 0.13, p = .167). Figure 1 illustrates the association between the overall SSSYC score and age as a function of gender.

As shown in Table 2, SES was not shown to be related to either the overall SSSYC score (β = .026, b = 0.03, p = .596) or to the subscales NS (β = .043, b = 0.02, p = .383), BI (β = .006, b = 0.00, p = .905) and TS (β = .009, b = 0.00, p = .848). Furthermore, we did not find a significant SES*age interaction (F = .620 (df = 4), p = .649) or a significant SES*gender interaction (F = .594 (df = 2), p = .552).

The findings show that sensation seeking and SES were not related in our study sample, although it should be noted that families with a low SES are underrepresented in this data (see Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Scatterplot illustrating the independence of the overall SSSYC score in relation to SES. Sensation seeking and the socio-economic status were not related in our study sample

Associations between sensation seeking and behavioural difficulties

The associations between scores on the different subscales of the SSSYC and scores on the SDQ scales are shown in Table 3. The analyses revealed significant negative associations between the overall SSSYC score and both emotional problems (β = −.293, b = −.689, p < .001) and peer relationship problems (β = −.110, b = −.311, p = .031). For every one point increase on the ‘emotional problems’ scale, the overall SSSYC score drops by 0.689 points. On the other hand, we found positive relationships between the overall SSSYC score and conduct problems (β = .190, b = .534, p = .001). A one point increase on the ‘conduct problems’ scale sees the overall SSSYC score increase by 0.534 points. Only the association between the overall SSSYC score and hyperactivity/inattention was not significant (β = .077, b = .132, p = .169).
Table 3

Associations between scores on the different scales of the SSSYC and behavioural difficulties

 

SDQ

Emotional symptoms

Conduct problems

Hyperactivity/inattention

Peer relationship problems

Pro-social behaviour

SSSYC Total

β

−.293

.190

.077

−.110

.073

 

b

−.689

.534

.132

−.311

.195

 

p

<.001

.001

.169

.031

.161

NS

β

−.120

.102

−.062

−.010

.094

 

b

−.123

.125

−.047

−.012

.110

 

p

.021

.092

.289

.854

.090

BI

β

−.251

.172

.103

−.193

.025

 

b

−.240

.196

.072

−.223

.027

 

p

<.001

.003

.072

<.001

.634

TS

β

−.275

.149

.123

−.053

.042

 

b

−.325

.211

.107

−.075

.056

 

p

<.001

.008

.026

.294

.412

NS Novelty Seeking, BI Behavioural Intensity, TS Thrill Seeking, β = standardised regression coefficient, b = non- standardised regression coefficient, level of significance p < 0.05. Higher sensation seeking is associated with conduct problems, whereas lower sensation seeking is related to emotional symptoms and peer-relationship problems

Looking at the constituent scales within the SSSYC, higher scores on the NS scale were significantly associated with fewer emotional problems (β = −.120, b = −.123, p = .021). Higher scores on the BI scale were associated with fewer emotional problems (β = −.251, b = −.240, p < 0.001), fewer peer relationship problems (β = −.193, b = −.223, p < .001), and more conduct problems (β = .172, b = .196, p = 0.003). Higher scores on the TS scale were significantly related to fewer emotional problems (β = −.275, b = −.325, p < .001), and more conduct problems (β = .149, b = .211, p = .008) as well as greater levels of hyperactivity/inattention (β = .123, b = .107, p = .026). In summary, higher sensation seeking was negatively related to internalising problem behaviour (especially emotional, but also peer-relationship problems) and showed positive associations with externalising problem behaviour (especially conduct problems, but also hyperactivity/inattention).

All statistical models presented in Table 3 were checked for interactions between each independent variable and age or gender. However, interactions did not reach significance and, consequently, were not included in the final models. Therefore, the associations reported in Table 3 can be assumed not to vary depending on child age or gender.

Discussion

Whereas previous studies mainly investigated sensation seeking in older children, adolescents, and adults, nearly nothing is known about sensation seeking in preschool children. This study sought to fill this gap in the research by examining possible associations between sensation seeking and variables such as child age, gender, socio-economic status, and behavioural difficulties in 3- to 6-year-old children.

Sensation seeking in the present sample

The questionnaire used in this study assessed novelty seeking, behavioural intensity, and thrill seeking in a sample of children. Our analyses suggest that these domains reflect different, but inter-related, facets of the same underlying trait of sensation seeking.

Associations between sensation seeking and gender, age and SES

We observed a greater level of sensation seeking in boys than in girls, which was consistent with our hypothesis and supports findings for children, adolescents and adults in previous samples [10, 15, 21, 23]. However, we did not find significant gender differences in all sensation seeking domains. Specifically, boys were only found to score higher than girls for thrill seeking. Thrill seeking reflects the need for a variety of emotional challenges that raise excitement. Parents of children who scored highly on the TS scale state that their children are looking for excitement and thrills, such as would be provided by ‘Watch a video of a car exploding’, or ‘Go to a zoo where animals are not in cages’. Reasons for higher thrill seeking in boys vs. girls might lie in the ways they are socialised and educated. Parents interact differently with boys compared to girls and might, therefore, impact children’s behaviours and attitudes [47]. Another factor that might explain the gender difference is an underlying difference in courage. In a previous study, more courageous children were shown to exhibit more thrill- and adventure-seeking behaviour [48]. Novelty seeking reflects enthusiasm, a dislike of repetition and a preference for new experiences, and the ‘behavioural intensity’ scale assesses the desire to engage in activities involving speed or danger. For these facets of sensation seeking, no gender differences were shown. These findings suggests that preschool girls, like their male counterparts, feel the same need for new, varying and intense experiences.

In addition, our analyses revealed greater levels of sensation seeking in older children than in younger children, at least in the domains NS and TS. Even if the present study did not assess sensation seeking longitudinally, this outcome suggests that sensation seeking is a trait that develops early and has already increased by the time the child reaches preschool age. This result is in line with the suggestion that sensation seeking increases during childhood [16].

As expected, and as shown in previous studies in adults [12, 26], we found no significant association between children’s sensation seeking and their SES. This finding suggests that sensation seeking is evenly distributed across social classes and is independent of a family’s education, occupational status and income. Please note, however, that the study sample shows a trend towards a higher socioeconomic status. Therefore, this finding might not be generalisable to the general population.

SSSYC and behavioural difficulties

We hypothesised that young children with a greater propensity for sensation seeking have more behavioural difficulties. In line with our expectations, we found positive relationships between sensation seeking and conduct problems. In particular, there is an association between behavioural intensity and thrill seeking, on the one side, and the likelihood of having more conduct problems, on the other. These results are in line with findings in children and adolescents [33, 34] and suggest that the link between sensation seeking and aggressive, quarrelsome behaviour and short-temperedness is already apparent in young childhood. In line with our hypothesis, we also found that children who present more thrill seeking showed more signs of hyperactivity/inattention.

Interestingly, our analyses revealed associations not only between sensation seeking and externalising behaviour, but also between sensation seeking and internalising behaviour. In adults, previous studies have yielded mixed results. In the present study, the analyses revealed a robust negative association between sensation seeking and emotional problems, which was observable in all domains of sensation seeking. Additionally, peer-relationship problems were found to relate to fewer indications of sensation seeking, at least in the domain of behavioural intensity. These findings suggest that higher levels of sensation seeking are negatively associated with internalizing behaviour. This suggestion is in line with previous studies in which lower sensation seeking was linked to symptoms of depression and anxiety [33, 49, 50]. However, sensation seeking has been shown to be related to other personality traits, e.g. extraversion and openness to experience [9]. These traits might mediate the observed relationship between sensation seeking and internalizing behaviour. Furthermore, due to their ‘courage’, children with higher sensation seeking might be especially popular in their peer group. This might be another explanation for the relationship between higher sensation seeking and fewer emotional and social problems. Future research should examine the mechanism underlying the associations between sensation seeking and early behavioural difficulties in children. Furthermore, it would be interesting to investigate the relationship in clinical samples, e.g. in children diagnosed with ADHD, behavioural disorders, or depression.

Limitations

This is the first study to have examined sensation seeking in German three- to six-year-old children and investigated how this trait might be associated not only with socio-demographic and socio-economic parameters, but also with behavioural difficulties. However, certain limitations should be acknowledged. All measures were based on parental reports and, thus, the parents’ perceptions of their children’s behaviour. However, parents might not be the most reliable informants. Furthermore, the representativeness of the present sample was limited, especially with respect to the SES of participating families. As in other cohort studies, the household income and educational level of the study’s participants reflect a higher socioeconomic status than the general population [40, 51].

Conclusion

The results of the present study indicate that boys are more sensation seeking than girls and suggest that sensation seeking increases with age. However, levels of sensation of seeking in children do not differ depending on the socio-economic status of their families. These results replicate findings in adults and strengthen the assumption that sensation seeking is a personality trait that is already observable in early childhood. Most interestingly, the findings show an association between a greater propensity for sensation seeking and externalising behavioural problems, whereas lower sensation seeking is associated with internalising behavioural problems.

Abbreviations

BI: 

Behavioural intensity

M: 

Mean

N: 

Number

NS: 

Novelty seeking

SD: 

Standard deviation

SDQ: 

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

SES: 

Socio-economic status

SSSYC: 

Sensation Seeking Scale for Young Children

TS: 

Thrill seeking

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the parents and children for their enthusiastic participation, the research assistants for their unflagging enthusiasm, and the LIFE data management team. Furthermore, we acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and Universität Leipzig within the program of Open Access Publishing.

Funding

This publication is supported by LIFE – Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig. LIFE is funded by means of the European Union, by means of the European Social Fund (ESF), by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and by means of the Free State of Saxony within the framework of the excellence initiative. The funding sources were not involved in the choice of study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in the writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

The first author analysed and interpreted the data and was the major contributor in writing the manuscript. MH, OW and MV contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data and created the Fig. TP an AH contributed to study conception, study design, data acquisition, and interpretation of results. WK was responsible for study conception and design and supervised the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors were involved in writing and revising the manuscript, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was designed under the supervision of the Ethics Committee of the University of Leipzig (Reg. No. 264–10-19,042,010). All participants were informed about the study program and the long-term use of data. Informed written consent was obtained from parents of all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
LIFE Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Strasse 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
(2)
Department of Women and Child Health, Hospital for Children and Adolescents and Center for Pediatric Research (CPL), Leipzig University, Liebigstrasse 20a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

References

  1. Zuckerman M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Zuckerman M, Mangelsdorff D, Neary R, Brustman B, Bone R. What is sensation seeker - personality trait and experience correlates of sensation-seeking scales. J Consult Psychol. 1972;39:308–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033398 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. McKay S, Skues JL, Williams BJ. With risk may come reward: sensation seeking supports resilience through effective coping. Pers Indiv Differ. 2018;121:100–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.030 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnett JJ. Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Personal Individ Differ. 1996;20:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00027-X .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zuckerman M, editor. Sensation seeking and risky behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Zuckerman M, Buchsbaum MS, Murphy DL. Sensation seeking and its biological correlates. Psychol Bull. 1980;88:187–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.187 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Donohew RL, Hoyle RH, Clayton RR, Skinner WF, Colon SE, Rice RE. Sensation seeking and drug use by adolescents and their friends: models for marijuana and alcohol. J Stud Alcohol. 1999;60:622–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kahler CW, Spillane NS, Metrik J, Leventhal AM, Monti PM. Sensation seeking as a predictor of treatment compliance and smoking cessation treatment outcomes in heavy social drinkers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009;93:285–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2009.01.003 .View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Roberti JW. A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. J Res Pers. 2004;38:256–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00067-9 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zuckerman M, Eysenck S, Eysenck HJ. Sensation seeking in England and America - cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. J Consult Clin Psych. 1978;46:139–49. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.46.1.139 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans-Polce RJ, Schuler MS, Schulenberg JE, Patrick ME. Gender- and age-varying associations of sensation seeking and substance use across young adulthood. Addict Behav. 2018;84:271–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.05.003 .View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Breivik G, Sand TS, Sookermany AM. Sensation seeking and risk-taking in the Norwegian population. Pers Indiv Differ. 2017;119:266–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.039 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Jooste S, Cain D, Cherry C. Sensation seeking, alcohol use, and sexual behaviors among sexually transmitted infection clinic patients in Cape Town, South Africa. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20:298–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.20.3.298 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Puente CP, Gonzalez Gutierrez JL, Abellan IC, Lopez AL. Sensation seeking, attitudes toward drug use, and actual use among adolescents: testing a model for alcohol and ecstacy use. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43:1615–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802241151 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kafry D. Sensation seeking of young-children. Pers Indiv Differ. 1982;3:161–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(82)90030-7 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Steinberg L, Albert D, Cauffman E, Banich M, Graham S, Woolard J. Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model. Dev Psychol. 2008;44:1764–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012955 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lynne-Landsman SD, Graber JA, Nichols TR, Botvin GJ. Is sensation seeking a stable trait or does it change over time? J Youth Adolesc. 2011;40:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9529-2 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Morrongiello BA, Sandomierski M, Valla J. Early identification of children at risk of unintentional injury: a sensation seeking scale for children 2-5 years of age. Accident Anal Prev. 2010;42:1332–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.014 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Peterson SJ, Smith GT. Association between elementary school personality and high school smoking and drinking. Addiction. 2017;112:2043–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13905 .View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Charles NE, Mathias CW, Acheson A, Dougherty DM. Preadolescent sensation seeking and early adolescent stress relate to at-risk adolescents' substance use by age 15. Addict Behav. 2017;69:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.005 .View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Cui L, Colasante T, Malti T, Ribeaud D, Eisner MP. Dual trajectories of reactive and proactive aggression from mid-childhood to early adolescence: relations to sensation seeking, risk taking, and moral reasoning. J Abnorm Child Psych. 2016;44:663–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0079-7 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lasenby-Lessard J, Morrongiello BA. Understanding risk compensation in children: experience with the activity and level of sensation seeking play a role. Accident Anal Prev. 2011;43:1341–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.006 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jensen JD, Weaver AJ, Ivic R, Imboden K. Developing a brief sensation seeking scale for children: establishing concurrent validity with video game use and rule-breaking behavior. Media Psychol. 2011;14:71–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.547831 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Morrongiello BA, Lasenby-Lessard J, Corbett M. Children’s risk taking in a gambling task and injury-risk situation: evidence for domain specificity in risk decisions. Pers Indiv Differ. 2009;46:298–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.018 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ball IL, Farnill D, Wangeman JF. Sex and age differences in sensation seeking: some national comparisons. Brit J Psychol. 1984;75:257–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01897.x .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Roth M, Schumacher J, Brähler E. Sensation seeking in the community: sex, age and sociodemographic comparisons on a representative German population sample. Pers Indiv Differ. 2005;39:1261–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Roth M, Hammelstein P, Brähler E. Beyond a youthful behavior style - age and sex differences in sensation seeking based on need theory. Pers Indiv Differ. 2007;43:1839–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zuckerman M. Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1979.Google Scholar
  29. Steinberg L. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev. 2008;28:78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002 .View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Collado A, Felton JW, MacPherson L, Lejuez CW. Longitudinal trajectories of sensation seeking, risk taking propensity, and impulsivity across early to middle adolescence. Addict Behav. 2014;39:1580–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.01.024 .View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Steinberg L, Icenogle G, Shulman EP, Breiner K, Chein J, Bacchini D, et al. Around the world, adolescence is a time of heightened sensation seeking and immature self-regulation. Developmental Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12532 .
  32. Harden KP, Tucker-Drob EM. Individual differences in the development of sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence: further evidence for a dual systems model. Dev Psychol. 2011;47:739–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023279 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marmorstein NR. Associations between dispositions to rash action and internalizing and externalizing symptoms in children. J Clin Child Adolesc. 2013;42:131–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2012.734021 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Bai S, Lee SS. Early-onset conduct problems: predictions from daring temperament and risk taking behavior. J Psychopathol Behav. 2017;39:575–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9612-z .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiklund J, Yu W, Tucker R, Marino LD. ADHD, impulsivity and entrepreneurship. J Bus Venturing. 2017;32:627–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.07.002 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu S, Gao Q, Ma L, Fan H, Mao H, Liu J, Wang W. The Zuckerman-Kuhlman personality questionnaire in bipolar I and II disorders: a preliminary report. Psychiatry Res. 2015;226:357–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.019 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ortin A, Lake AM, Kleinman M, Gould MS. Sensation seeking as risk factor for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in adolescence. J Affect Disorders. 2012;143:214–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.05.058 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Giannoni-Pastor A, Gomà-i-Freixanet M, Valero S, Fidel Kinori SG, Tasqué-Cebrián R, Arguello JM, Casas M. Personality as a predictor of depression symptoms in burn patients: a follow-up study. Burns. 2015;41:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.07.028 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kövi Z, Odler V, Gacsályi S, Hittner JB, Hevesi K, Hübner A, Aluja A. Sense of coherence as a mediator between personality and depression. Pers Indiv Differ. 2017;114:119–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.064 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Poulain T, Baber R, Vogel M, Pietzner D, Kirsten T, Jurkutat A, et al. The LIFE child study: a population-based perinatal and pediatric cohort in Germany. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32:145–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0216-9 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Quante M, Hesse M, Dohnert M, Fuchs M, Hirsch C, Sergeyev E, et al. The LIFE child study: a LIFE course approach to disease and health. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1021. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1021 .View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Winkler J, Stolzenberg H, Adjustierung d. Sozialen-Schicht-Index für die Anwendung im Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS). Wismar: Hochsch., Fachbereich Wirtschaft; 2009.Google Scholar
  43. Lampert T, Kroll LE, Müters S. Messung des sozioökonomischen Status in der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2013:631–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1663-4 .
  44. Lampert T, Muters S, Stolzenberg H, Kroll LE. Messung des sozioökonomischen Status in der KiGGS-Studie: Erste Folgebefragung (KiGGS Welle 1). Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2014;57:762–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-014-1974-8 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psyc. 1997;38:581–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Woerner W, Becker A, Friedrich C, Klasen H, Goodman R, Rothenberger A. Normierung und Evaluation der deutschen Elternversion des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Felderhebung. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. 2002;30:105–12. https://doi.org/10.1024//1422-4917.30.2.105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Marmion S, Lundberg-Love P. Learning masculinity and femininity: gender socialization from parents and peers across the life span. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 1–26). Westport, CT, US: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group; 2004.Google Scholar
  48. Muris P. Fear and courage in children: two sides of the same coin? J Child Fam Stud. 2009;18:486–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9271-0 .View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Siennick SE, Widdowson AO, Woessner M, Feinberg ME. Internalizing symptoms, peer substance use, and substance use initiation. J Res Adolesc. 2016;26:645–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12215 .View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Farmer A, Redman K, Harris T, Mahmood A, Sadler S, McGuffin P. Sensation-seeking, life events and depression. Brit J Psychol. 2001;178:549–52. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.178.6.549 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Heinrich J, Brüske I, Schnappinger M, Standl M, Flexeder C, Thiering E, et al. Die zwei deutschen Geburtskohorten GINIplus und LISAplus. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2012;55:864–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1485-4 .View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement