Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Pediatrics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

BMI is a poor predictor of adiposity in young overweight and obese children

BMC PediatricsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:135

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0891-z

Received: 10 March 2017

Accepted: 28 May 2017

Published: 2 June 2017

Abstract

Background

The body mass index (BMI) is a simple and widely utilized screening tool for obesity in children and adults. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate if BMI could predict total fat mass (TFM) and percent body fat (%FAT) in a sample of overweight and obese children.

Methods

In this observational study, body composition was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 663 male and female overweight and obese children at baseline within a multidisciplinary, pediatric fitness clinic at an academic medical center. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to evaluate whether BMI z-score (BMIz) predicts TFM or %FAT.

Results

The BMIz, sex and age of subjects were identified as significant predictors for both TFM and %FAT. In subjects younger than 9 years, the BMIz was a weak to moderate predictor for both TFM (R2 = 0.03 for males and 0.26 for females) and %FAT (R2 = 0.22 for males and 0.38 for females). For subjects between 9 and 18 years, the BMIz was a strong predictor for TFM (R2 between 0.57 and 0.73) while BMIz remained only moderately predictive for %FAT (R2 between 0.22 and 0.42).

Conclusions

These findings advance the understanding of the utility and limitations of BMI in children and adolescents. In youth (9-18y), BMIz is a strong predictor for TFM, but a weaker predictor of relative body fat (%FAT). In children younger than 9y, BMIz is only a weak to moderate predictor for both TFM and %FAT. This study cautions the use of BMIz as a predictor of %FAT in children younger than 9 years.

Keywords

Body mass indexChildhood obesityDual X-Ray absorptiometryBody composition

Background

Childhood obesity is a global public health crisis [1, 2] and obesity in the United States has more than doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents over the last 30 years [3, 4]. At present, more than one-third of children and adolescents in the United States are overweight or obese, more than 17% of these youth are obese [3]. Childhood obesity is associated with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, psychosocial problems, decreased quality of life, and increased likelihood of becoming obese adults [3, 515]. Morbidity and mortality risk may vary between different racial and Hispanic origin groups at the same body mass index (BMI) [16, 17]. Adiposity is an independent risk factor for insulin resistance and a strong predictor of morbidity [1821]. Therefore, directly assessing body fat is a key strategy for preventative and therapeutic intervention of childhood obesity [18, 22].

Obesity, or having excess body fat [23], can be defined using cut points of BMI; the ratio of an individual’s weight to height squared (kg/m2). The BMI varies with age in children and thus BMI values are compared with age- and sex-specific references. For children and adolescents aged 2 to 19 years, BMI is plotted on the sex-specific, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth chart to identify the BMI-for-age percentile. Childhood obesity is defined as a BMI at or above the 95th percentile on the BMI-for-Age growth chart The BMI-for-age percentile is calculated based on a reference population [22, 24]. The indirect relationship between BMI and measures of adiposity has been established but varies according to sex, age, and race-ethnicity [16, 17].

The literature also varies in the strength of the association between BMI and body composition variables [2426]. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the relationships between BMIz, total fat mass (TFM) and percent body fat (%FAT) using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a sample of overweight and obese children. This study evaluated the relationship between BMIz and TFM, as well as, BMIz and %FAT as determined by DXA in four age categories of overweight and obese children: 4–9, 9–11, 12–14, and 15–18 years.

Traditional anthropometric measures (weight, waist circumference, BMI) used to evaluate and track changes in body composition can misclassify patients and may not accurately assess significant changes in body composition over time. The most common clinical body composition tools include waist circumference, skinfold calipers, bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), hydrodensitometry, and DXA [27, 28]. Due to ease of acquisition, the most widely used clinical outcome variable is BMI. Historically, BMI has been accepted as the standard clinical screening tool for youth to determine their risk status for disease states related to weight and adiposity [22, 23]. However, the relationships between BMI and laboratory measurement of body fat and lean tissue mass are not clear in today’s generation of overweight and obese youth. Primary care providers play a pivotal role in the process of preventing, identifying and treating childhood obesity and associated co-morbidities [2934] and frequently use BMI to screen for excess body fat relative to body weight. It is unclear whether BMI can be utilized to monitor changes resulting from weight management interventions designed to improve body composition in this population. Therefore, this study evaluated the effectiveness of BMI to predict TFM and %FAT by DXA in overweight and obese youth.

Methods

All subjects were overweight or obese boys and girls (ages 4–18 years) evaluated as part of their routine clinical care at a multidisciplinary weight management program within an academic medical center. Anthropometric and body composition measurements were collected at the same initial encounter. Measurement procedures were performed and analyzed by the same investigators. Height was measured with a wall-mounted stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm. Weight was measured on a calibrated beam balance platform scale to the nearest 0.1 kg. BMI z-score (BMIz) and BMI-for-age percentiles were computed using the CDC reference values.

The body composition values of total body bone, muscle and fat mass, as well as, %FAT were measured by DXA. Whole body scans were performed using the Norland XR-36 whole body bone densitometer (Norland Corporation, Ft. Atkinson, Wisconsin USA) and tissue masses were analyzed using software version 3.7.4/2.1.0. All subjects were positioned in the supine position and scanned by the same investigator. Subjects removed metal objects or clothing containing metal components and wore only workout shorts and t-shirt for the scan procedure. Each scan session was preceded by a calibration routine using multiple quality control phantoms that simulate soft tissue and bone. Based on 18 scans of 6 subjects using the XR-36 whole body procedures the total body coefficients of variation (CV) are as follows: soft tissue mass 0.2%, total body mass 0.2%, lean body mass 1.0%, fat mass 2.5%, percent fat 2.4% and total BMC 0.9%. The Norland XR-36 has been previously validated for measurement of body composition against multi-component models [3537]. Study procedures were approved by the Health Sciences Human Subjects Committee at the University of Wisconsin- Madison.

All baseline characteristics were summarized in terms of means (SD) or frequencies and percentages. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between BMIz and markers of body composition, including TFM and %FAT. The univariate analyses were stratified by gender and designated age groups: 4–9 years, 9–11 years, 12–14 years, and 15–18 years Multiple regression analysis models were created with TFM and %FAT as dependent variables and BMI z-score and age as independent variables. Slope parameter estimates were reported along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Furthermore, moving average regression analyses of TFM on BMIz and relative %FAT on BMIz across the continuous age range (4–18 years) with age windows of +/−1 year were conducted in order to visually display how the association between TFM, relative fat and BMIz changes with age. The corresponding Rw2 values were calculated and plotted using the smoothing spline method. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC). All reported P-values are two-sided and P < 0.05 was used to define statistical significance.

Results

Subjects were 663 overweight and obese boys and girls (49% male) with a mean (SD) age of 11.7 (3.3) years (range 4–18 years), BMI of 30.2 kg/m2 (6.5) and BMIz of 2.2 (0.5). Mean body composition values for all subjects were a TFM of 36.1 (14.2) kg and %FAT of 39.3% (5.2) in the sample (Table 1). The majority (90%) of the subjects were obese of which 279 (47%) were severely obese with a BMI-for-age above the 99th percentile (Table 1). The TFM and %FAT were significantly higher in severely obese subjects (BMI-for-age > 99th percentile) when compared to subjects within the 85th to 99th BMI percentile range (p < 0.001) (Table 2).
Table 1

Subject characteristics

 

Male

Female

Overall

(N = 325)

(N = 338)

(N = 663)

 

N

%

N

%

N

%

Age (years)

 4–9

66

20%

50

15%

116

18%

 9–11

101

31%

106

31%

207

31%

 12–14

90

28%

104

31%

194

29%

 15–18

68

21%

78

23%

146

22%

BMI-for-Age percentile

 85 to 95th

25

8%

38

11%

63

10%

 95 to 99th

147

45%

174

51%

321

48%

  > 99th

153

47%

126

37%

279

42%

BMI (kg/m2)

 Mean ± SD

29.8 ± 6.1

 

30.7 ± 6.9

 

30.3 ± 6.5

 

BMI z-score

 Mean ± SD

2.3 ± 0.5

 

2.2 ± 0.4

 

2.2 ± 0.5

 

Total Fat Mass, TFM (kg)

 Mean ± SD

34.4 ± 13.1

 

37.7 ± 15.0

 

36.1 ± 14.2

 

Percent Body Fat, %FAT (%)

 Mean ± SD

38.3 ± 5.6

 

38.3 ± 5.6

 

39.3 ± 5.2

 
Table 2

Mean ± SD total fat mass (TFM) and percent body fat (%FAT) by BMI-for-age percentiles and sex

 

BMI percentile

Sex

Body Fat Measure

85th–95th

95th–99th

>99th

p-value

Male

TFM (kg)

23.0 ± 5.7

30.6 ± 8.2

39.8 ± 15.2

<0.001

%FAT

33.9 ± 5.9

36.6 ± 5.4

40.7 ± 4.6

<0.001

Female

TFM (kg)

26.5 ± 7.1

34.7 ± 10.7

45.1 ± 18.1

<0.001

%FAT

35.7 ± 4.2

39.0 ± 3.8

43.1 ± 4.2

<0.001

In the multivariate regression analysis, BMIz (p < 0.001), sex (p < 0.001) and age (p = 0.01) were identified as independent predictors for TFM. Furthermore, a significant interaction effect between age and BMIz was detected (p < 0.001). For %FAT, only BMIz (p < 0.001) and sex (p < 0.001) were identified as significant predictors. The results of the age-stratified analysis are shown in Table 3 and visually displayed in Fig. 1 for males and females. In subjects younger than 9 years, BMIz was identified as a weak to moderately strong predictor for both TFM (R2 = 0.03 for males and 0.26 for females) and %FAT (R2 = 0.22 for males and 0.38 for females). For subjects between 9 and 18 years, on the other hand, BMIz was identified as a strong predictor for TFM (R2 between 0.57 and 0.73) while BMIz remained only weakly to moderately predictive for %FAT (R2 between 0.22 and 0.42) for both males and females (Table 3). The partial correlation coefficient between BMIz and TFM was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60–0.72) for males and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.85) for females after adjusting for sex and age while the partial correlation coefficient between BMIz and %FAT was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.30–0.48) for males and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52–0.66) for females. These results indicate a relationship between BMIz and TFM, as well as, BMIz and %FAT varying by age and sex.
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate regression analysis for predicting total fat mass (TFM) and percent body fat (%FAT) on BMI z-score in an overweight and obese pediatric population (4–18 years), stratified by sex and age groups

  

Outcome:

Total Fat Mass, TFM (kg)

Outcome:

Percent Body Fat, %FAT (%)

Age (years)

Gender

β (Slope)

95% CI for β

P-value

R2

β (Slope)

95% CI for β

P-value

R2

4-9a

Male

1.9

−0.8–4.6

0.161

0.03c

3.7

1.9–5.4

<0.001

0.22d

Female

6.9

3.6–10.3

<0.001

0.26d

7.0

5.2–8.8

<0.001

0.38d

9–11a

Male

18.1

15.3–20.9

<0.001

0.63e

7.0

5.2–8.8

<0.001

0.38d

Female

17.1

14.2–20.0

<0.001

0.57e

6.7

4.4–9.1

<0.001

0.42d

12–14a

Male

27.0

23.2–30.9

<0.001

0.69e

7.3

4.4–10.2

<0.001

0.22d

Female

25.7

22.2–29.2

<0.001

0.67e

6.1

4.4–8.0

<0.001

0.29d

15–18a

Male

26.4

22.5–30.3

<0.001

0.73e

7.2

4.2–10.1

<0.001

0.26d

Female

30.4

26.2–34.6

<0.001

0.73e

6.0

4.0–7.9

<0.001

0.26d

Overallb

Male

15.1

13.3–17.0

<0.001

0.66e

4.4

3.3–5.5

<0.001

0.29d

Female

21.9

20.3–23.6

<0.001

0.82e

6.8

5.8–7.8

<0.001

0.37d

aUnivariate regression analysis of TBF and %FAT on BMIz

bMultivariate regression analysis of TBF and %FAT on BMIz and age

cBMIz was non-predictive of this outcome variable

dBMIz was a moderate predictor of this outcome variable

eBMIz was a strong predictor of this outcome variable

Fig. 1

Regression analysis (R2) for moving average across continuous age range of total fat mass (TFM) on the BMI z-score (BMIz) and relative fat (%FAT) on BMIz, stratified by sex

Discussion

The BMI is widely used as a screening tool as a proxy for weight-related health risk because high BMI values may reflect excess adiposity. However, BMI does not estimate body composition and cannot differentiate between fat and muscle in children. Our study demonstrates that age has a strong interaction with %FAT, but in children younger than 9 years, the BMIz is a weak predictor for both TFM and %FAT. The BMIz is only a weak predictor for TFM and %FAT in young children, less than 9 years of age. These data, however, are different for older children. The BMIz is a strong predictor of TFM in children and adolescents over the age of 9 years. These results have strong implications for the use and reliance on the BMI for screening and monitoring weight-related changes in overweight and obese youth.

It is important to consider the difference between TFM and %FAT. Total fat mass is the absolute fat mass for that individual. The TFM value does not identify an individual’s relative fat, or the amount of fat in relation to their bone, muscle and total body mass. While it has been shown that DXA is a more accurate measure for adiposity, [38, 39] it may not be practical on a large scale due to cost and resource constraints, and is not currently available and used in the greater community [40]. However, many clinicians continue to utilize BMI as a screening tool for obesity and weight-related disease states based on the assumption that a high BMI equals a high degree of adiposity. However, the results of the current study using DXA, indicate that BMI is not diagnostic of the degree of body fatness in younger children. Because childhood obesity has been identified as a global public health crisis [1, 2], clinicians should be aware of weaknesses in utilizing BMI to estimate excess body fat in younger children.

Flegal [16] utilized NHANES (1999–2004) data to assess the performance of the standard BMI-for-age percentile categories relative to the prevalence of excess adiposity (%FAT) using DXA in 8,821children ages 8 to 19 years of age. They concluded that a narrow range of the BMI-for-age percentiles identify individuals with both a high BMI and excess adiposity and large differences in the prevalence in children and adolescents with intermediate BMI-for-age percentile ranges and high adiposity. Flegal, et al. encourages caution when interpreting comparisons of high BMI ranges in terms of adiposity, by race-ethnicity, as well as, in the interpretation of the relationship between BMI and adiposity in children with intermediate BMI ranges. The present study only examined overweight and obese children and adolescents and the present results support Flegal’s findings that BMI maintains a weak relationship with relative body fat (%FAT) in overweight and obese children and adolescents and also cautions the use of BMI as a predictor of %FAT in children younger than 9 years.

Pietrobelli [41] found that BMI was strongly associated with TFM (R2 = 0.85 and 0.89 for boys and girls, respectively) and %FAT (R2 = 0.63 and 0.69 for boys and girls, respectively). While Pietrobelli concluded that the association between BMI and adiposity is consistent across the age spectrum, our data does not support this in children less than 9 years of age. Their sample was comprised of healthy children with a mean BMI of 23.8 kg/m2 which was lower than the mean BMI for the present sample (30.2 kg/m2). The Pietrobelli work represents earlier exploratory efforts to understand and associate BMI with more robust measures of body fat. The new CDC BMI growth charts utilize percentiles due to the fact that simple BMI does not represent relative adiposity very well; BMI z-scores must be calculated and used when working with children and adolescents [42].

Our conclusions align with Katzmarzyk [24]; we recognize that healthcare practitioners should also exercise caution when comparing BMI across race-ethnicity groups. Additionally, BMI may misclassify some segments of the pediatric population. Clinicians should be careful when utilizing BMI alone to classify an individual’s %FAT [26, 28, 40, 43].

The present assessment is novel because it 1) uses an analysis stratified by age to evaluate the limitation of BMI and BMIz for estimating adiposity (TFM and %FAT) in overweight and obese children, 2) identifies the non-predictive nature of BMIz relative to TFM in younger children (4–9 years) and 3) utilizes DXA for body fat to evaluate these relationships. A strength of the current study was the age-stratified analysis in a large cohort (n = 663) of overweight and obese children. A limitation of the study and area of future investigation would be to identify the difference in correlations or associations by race-ethnicity. Another potential area of future research is to investigate if the BMIz is a valid tool for monitoring significant changes in a pediatric subject’s TFM, lean mass and %FAT over time when compared to DXA.

Conclusions

These findings advance the understanding of the utility and limitations of BMI in children. This study utilized multivariate modeling to assess the relationship between BMIz with TFM and %FAT using DXA in an overweight and obese pediatric population (4–18 years) stratified by age. These data indicate that there is a strong interaction effect for the association between BMIz and TFM with respect to age. In overweight and obese youth, aged 9 to 18 years, BMI z-score is a strong predictor for TFM, but only a weak-to-moderate predictor of %FAT. In overweight and obese children younger than 9 years, the BMIz is a weak predictor for both TFM and %FAT. Under the conditions of the study, these data indicate a relationship between BMI and TFM, a weaker association with relative body fat (%FAT), and demonstrate the limitation of using BMIz as a predictor of %FAT in overweight and obese children under 9 years of age.

Abbreviations

%FAT: 

Total percent body fat

BMI: 

Body mass index

BMIz: 

Body mass index z-score

DXA: 

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry

TFM: 

Total fat mass

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors want to acknowledge all staff members from the Pediatric Fitness Clinic for their passion, dedication and assistance in collecting data per clinic policies and procedures. This includes Dr. Aaron Carrel, Dr. Alexander Adams, Dr. Blaise Nemeth, Dr. Jennifer Rehm, Randy Clark, Judy Hilgers, Ellen Houston, Stephanie Wolf, Karissa Peyer, Amy Mihm, Amy Caulum, Amanda Hesse, Nora McCormick, and Cassie Vanderwall.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

There is no funding.

Authors’ contributions

CV, RC, and AC conceptualized the study in accordance with all authors, drafted the initial manuscript and led the process for revising the manuscript for submission. JE was responsible for the statistical methods, analysis and results section. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. No funds were received or distributed to anyone to produce this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing of interest, financial or other.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Wisconsin at Madison. Need for signed consent and assent was waived because this study presents a minimal risk for the breach of confidentiality to subjects. The waiver did not adversely affect the rights and welfare of subjects. Confidentiality protections are in place. The research could not practicably be carried out without a waiver of informed consent since the large volume of research subjects proposed along with the difficulty that many patients are lost to follow-up and the time to get permission of each patient for the outcomes analysis would not be practical. In addition, clinical care for patients will already be completed when those patients data will be extracted from the medical records for use in future outcomes analysis done under the IRB protocol. Therefore, it was deemed impractical by the aforementioned IRB to obtain consent from these subjects.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Wisconsin
(2)
UW Health, University Hospital

References

  1. Karnik S, Kanekar A. Childhood Obesity: A Global Public Health Crisis. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(1):1–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Williams EP, Mesidor M, Winters K, Dubbert PM, Wyatt SB. Overweight and Obesity: Prevalence, Consequences, and Causes of a Growing Public Health Problem. Curr Obes Rep. 2015;4:363.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311(8):806–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2011: With Special Features on Socioeconomic Status and Health. Hyattsville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. CDC. Obesity task force report. 2010; https://letsmove.obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/letsmove.gov/files/TaskForce_on_Childhood_Obesity_May2010_FullReport.pdf. Accessed Sept 2015.
  6. Barlow SE. AAP Expert Committee. AAP Expert Committee Recommendations Regarding Prevention, Assessment and Treatment of Child Obesity. Pediatrics. 2007;120:s164–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dietz WH, Robinson TN. Overweight children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2100–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. (CDC) CfDCaP. 2012; https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/defining.html. Accessed Sept 2015.
  9. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM. Criteria for definition of overweight in transition: background and recommendations for the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:1074–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ogden CL, Li Y, Freedman DS, et al. Smoothed percentage body fat percentiles for U.S. children and adolescents, 1999–2004. In: National health statistics reports; no 43. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics. p. 2011.Google Scholar
  11. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012;307:483–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Arslanian SA, Connor EL, Farooqi IS, et al. Pediatric Obesity—Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(3):709–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Holmes ME, Eisenmann JC, Ekkekakis P, et al. Physical activity, stress, and metabolic risk score in 8- to 18-year-old boys. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(2):294–307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Dietz WH, et al. Relationship of childhood obesity to coronary heart disease risk factors in adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 2001;108(3):712–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelly AS, Barlow SE, Rao G, et al. American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in the Young Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Severe obesity in children and adolescents: identification, associated health risks, and treatment approaches: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128(15):1689–712.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Flegal KM, Ogden CL, Yanovski JA, Freedman DS, Shepherd JA, Graubard BI, et al. High adiposity and high body mass index-for-age in US children and adolescents overall and by race-ethnic group. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(4):1020–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, Guricci S. Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship. Obes Rev. 2002;3(3):141–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dietz WH. Health consequences of obesity in youth: Childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics. 1998;101:518–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee CD, Blair SN, Jackson AS. Cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(3):373–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sinha R, Dufour S, Petersen KF, et al. Assessment of skeletal muscle triglyceride content by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in lean and obese adolescents: relationships to insulin sensitivity, total body fat, and central adiposity. Diabetes. 2002;51(4):1022–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sui X, LaMonte MJ, Laditka JN, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity as mortality predictors in older adults. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2507–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Krebs NF, Himes JH, Jacobson D, Nicklas TA, Guilday P, Styne D. Assessment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity. Pediatrics. 2007;120:S193–228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Body Mass Index: Considerations for Practitioners. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/downloads/BMIforPactitioners.pdf. Accessed Jan 2017
  24. Katzmarzyk PT, Barreira TV, Broyles ST, Chaput J-P, Fogelholm M, Hu G, Kuriyan R, Kurpad A, Lambert EV, Maher C, Maia J, Matsudo V, Olds T, Onywera V, Sarmiento OL, Standage M, Tremblay MS, Tudor-Locke C, Zhao P, Church TS, the ISCOLE Research Group. Association between body mass index and body fat in 9–11-year-old children from countries spanning a range of human development. Int J Obes Suppl. 2015;5:S43–S46.Google Scholar
  25. Chin J, Wang H, Jia-Shuai M. The association between body mass index, waist circumference with body fat percent, and abdominal fat rate in overweight and obese pupils. Prev Med. 2013;47(07):603–7.Google Scholar
  26. Widhalm K, Schönegger K. BMI: Does it really reflect body fat mass? J Pediatr. 1999;134(4):522.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin-Calvo N, Moreno-Galarraga L, Martinez-Gonzalez MA. Association between Body Mass Index, Waist-to-Height Ratio and Adiposity in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2016;8:8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Burkhauser RV, Cawley J. Beyond BMI: The value of more accurate measures of fatness and obesity in social science research. J Health Econ. 2008;27:519–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Janz KF, Butner KL, Pate RR. The role of pediatricians in increasing physical activity in youth. JAMA Pediatr. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(7):595–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Perrin EM, Finkle JP, Benjamina JT. Obesity prevention and the primary care pediatrician’s office. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007;19(3):354–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Sothern MS, Gordon ST. Family-based weight management in the pediatric healthcare setting. Obes Manag. 2005;1(5):197–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Daniels SR, Hassink SG, Committee on Nutrition. The role of the pediatrician in primary prevention of obesity. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien SH, Holubkov R, Cohen RE. Identification, Evaluation, and Management of Obesity in an Academic Primary Care Center. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e154–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yi-Frazier JP, Larison C, Neff JM, et al. Obesity in Pediatric Specialty Clinics: An Underestimated Comorbidity. Clin Pediatr. 2012;51(11):1056–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Clark RR, Sullivan JC, Bartok C, Schoeller DA. Multi-component cross-validation of minimum weight predictions for college wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(2):342–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Clark RR, Bartok C, Sullivan JC, Schoeller DA. Minimum weight predictions cross-validated using a four-compartment model. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2004;36(4):639–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Clark RR, Sullivan JC, Bartok CJ, Carrel AL. DXA provides a valid minimum weight in wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(11):2069–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Cornier M-A, Despres J-P, Davis N, Grossniklaus DA, Klein S, Lamarche B, et al. Assessing Adiposity: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;124:1996–2019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Boeke CE, Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rifas-Shiman SL, Taveras EM, Gillman MW. Correlations among adiposity measures in school-aged children. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Freedman DS, Ogden CL, Blanck HM, Borrud LG, Dietz WH. The Abilities of Body Mass Index and Skinfold Thicknesses to Identify Children with Low or Elevated Levels of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Determined Body Fatness. J Pediatr. 2013;163:160–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Pietrobelli A, Faith MS, Allison DB, Gallagher D, Chiumello G, Heymsfield SB. Body mass index as a measure of adiposity among children and adolescents: A validation study. J Pediatr. 1998;132:204–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Growth Charts: United States. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/background.htm. Accessed Jan 2017.
  43. Flegal KM, Ogden CL. Childhood Obesity: Are We All Speaking the Same Language? Adv Nutr. 2011;2:159S–66S.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement