Skip to content


  • Technical advance
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Presence of anti-Toxocara canis antibodies and risk factors in children from the Amecameca and Chalco regions of México

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Pediatrics201515:65

  • Received: 25 September 2014
  • Accepted: 20 May 2015
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Toxocariasis is a zoonotic disease that poses a threat to public health worldwide. This disease primarily affects children and is caused by the presence in the digestive tract of a common roundworm of dogs, Toxocara canis, or cats, Toxocara cati. Toxocara is responsible for the presentation of various syndromes in humans depending on the affected organs.


In this study, the prevalence of anti-T. canis antibodies was investigated in children aged 3–16 years from semirural populations in the municipalities of Amecameca and Chalco in México. An ELISA was used to determine the presence of anti-T. canis antibodies in blood samples.


Of the 183 sera obtained for this study, 22 were positive for anti-T. canis antibodies (12.02 %). Of these, 6.50 % were from males and 5.4 % were from females. Risk factors were investigated and it was found that living near a cattle operation had a statistically significant association with (Chi2 = 5.51 and p = 0.01) and was a risk factor for (OR = 4.25, p = 0.02) seropositivity to T. canis. Keeping dogs with short hair (Chi2 = 3.24 and p = 0.07) showed a tendency toward seropositivity for T. canis, as did the habit of sleeping with pets (Chi2 = 3.46 and p = 0.06).


Seropositivity to T. canis was confirmed in children in the Amecameca and Chalco regions of México and the risk factors were identified. These findings provide important insight into the prevalence and spread of this zoonotic parasite.


  • Toxocara
  • Zoonotic disease
  • México


Dogs are associated with more than 60 zoonotic diseases worldwide, mainly by parasitic organisms, posing a serious health threat to humans [1,2]. Many of these intestinal parasites are eliminated as eggs, larvae or oocysts into the environment, and for this reason, contamination with the feces of dogs in private and public areas such as parks or gardens represents an important source of infection [3,4].

One of the most common infections worldwide caused by parasites is toxocariasis, a zoonotic disease [5] caused by migrating larvae of the roundworm species Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati [6]. The eggs of this parasitic helminth may be accidentally ingested by humans [7] into the duodenum; once the eggs hatch, they release three-stage larvae (L3) through the action of gastric juice and digestive enzymes, which penetrate the intestinal wall, enter the bloodstream and migrate to different organs, where they lead to syndromes such as visceral larva migrans, covert larva migrans, ocular larva migrans and neurological larva migrans [6,8].

Some risk factors associated with this parasite include: gender, age, socioeconomic status, close contact with domestic animals [9], ingestion of raw meat [7], poor hygiene, inadequate hand washing, nail biting, eating contaminated food, and contact with soil or the hair from cats or dogs contaminated with eggs [4]. Children are the social group most at risk because of their recreation activities, hygiene and close relationship with pets [10].

In México, there have been studies to investigate the prevalence of T. canis in recreational areas, and in soil samples and the feces of stray dogs. Rates of 24 % and 67.5 % were obtained [11,12]. The high rate of contamination was thought to reflect the socioeconomic status and sanitation level of the studied region. Similar studies in other countries have also revealed a high prevalence of T. canis; for example, 66 % prevalence in Spain and 67 % prevalence in Argentina [13].

Furthermore, seroprevalence studies in children reported rates of 22.22 % in México [14] compared with 86.75 % in Taiwan in 2014 [15]. To investigate the public health threat caused by toxocariasis in more detail in México, in this study, circulating anti-T. canis antibodies and risk factors for T. canis were investigated in a semirural population in the State of México.


Study population

A total of 183 blood samples were collected from children in the municipalities of Amecameca and Chalco, México (Fig. 1), between April 2013 and February 2014. Of the children sampled, 97 were male and 86 were female, and their ages ranged from 3–16 years. Parents or guardians of minors signed an informed consent form and agreed to participate in the project, which was approved by the ethics committee of the University Center UAEM Amecameca of the Autonomous University of the State of México.
Figure 1
Figure 1

The location of the municipalities of Amecameca and Chalco within the State of México

Epidemiological data collection

Epidemiological data for all of the children included in the study were obtained. These included: age, gender, height, weight, body mass index and background information regarding recent types of pathology – respiratory, dermatological, neurological, allergic and ocular – and the following risk factors: eating habits and hygiene.

Processing blood samples

A 3-ml sample of blood was obtained from each participant through phlebotomy and these samples were deposited in tubes without anticoagulant and incubated at room temperature for 40 min. Then, samples were subjected to centrifugation at 4000 × g for 10 min. The obtained sera were stored at −20 °C according to official Mexican guidelines for the storage of human samples (NOM-003-SSA2-1993).

Serological testing of blood samples

Serological tests were performed on the blood samples to measure anti-T. canis antibodies using a commercial ELISA kit, with a sensitivity of 87.5 % and specificity of 93.3 % (DIAGMEX-Toxocara® SA De CV. México). The optical density of the samples was determined using a Microplate Modulus® multiplate spectrophotometer (Turner Biosystems, Kampenhout, Belgium) at a wavelength of 460 nm [16]. The optical density cutoff value was 0.30, and sera with an optical density of 0.30 or greater were considered positive.

Statistical analysis

To compare the rates of positivity between groups, Fisher’s exact test [16] was applied. The variables obtained were analyzed by the Chi-square test to determine the levels of association; a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. The relative risk of T. canis antibodies was calculated from the odds ratio, with a significance of p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP® 8.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).


Of the 183 sera tested, anti-T. canis antibodies were detected in 22 (12.02 %). No statistically significant difference was found between the prevalence of anti-T. canis antibodies in males and females (Table 1; p = 0.64).
Table 1

Comparison of the presence of antibodies with Toxocara canis between genders


Positive n = 22 (%)

Negative n = 161 (%)




10 (5.4 %)

76 (41.5 %)




12 (6.5 %)

85 (46.4 %)



12.02 %

87.98 %


*Fisher p < 0.05

Regarding risk factors, it was determined that keeping dogs with short hair (Chi2 = 3.24 and p = 0.07) showed a tendency toward seropositivity for T. canis, as did the habit of sleeping with pets (Chi2 = 3.46 and p = 0.06). By contrast, practicing preventive medicine and coexistence did not show a significant association (Table 2). Living near livestock farms showed a statistically significant association with T. canis seropositivity (Chi2 = 5.51 and p = 0.01) and was also a risk factor for T. canis seropositivity (OR = 4.25, p = 0.02) (Table 3).
Table 2

Association between risk factors and the presence of antibodies against animal-related Toxocara canis

Risk factor

Positive n = 22

Negative n = 161






Pets at home








Sleeping with pet








Puppy <6 months








Dog licks face








Dewormed >6 months ago (pet)








Dog with long hair (>1 cm)








Dog with short hair (<1 cm)








Contact with dogs or cats outside the home








OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

p < 0.05

Table 3

Risk factors associated with housing

Risk factor

Positive n = 22

Negative n = 161






Frequent visits to public parks








Live near livestock farming








Garden at home








OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

p < 0.05


In Mexicali, México, a previous study analyzing the seroprevalence of T. canis in children reported a rate of 10.6 %, less than that in the present study (12.02 %), and a higher percentage of seropositive males (53.1 %) than females, which they attributed to differences in the games played by children and their resulting close contact with the environment [10]. In other research [17], a study conducted in southeastern São Paulo, Brazil, with volunteer donors aged 19–65 years, reported seroprevalence of 8.7 % and concluded that gender (p = 0.69) and age (p = 0.99) were not associated with parasitoses. These findings were in agreement with the present study in which no significant association was reported between gender and the presence of T. canis antibodies (p = 0.64). A study by Getaz and colleagues in 2007 found no significant association between seropositivity to T. canis and asthma, but did identify an association with nocturnal wheezing [18].

Hygiene habits, housing area and customs are factors that primarily influence the variation of seroprevalence of T. canis, and the risk of transmission increases with the degree of environmental pollution. Three research teams [1921] conducted studies to identify the predisposing factors for the transmission of parasitic zoonoses and determined that pets in the bedroom, not regularly cleaning feces and no or inadequate hand washing after contact with animals posed the greatest risks of transmitting zoonotic diseases. Contamination with Toxocara spp. from the land in parks, playgrounds, gardens and beaches in urban and suburban areas is considered a critical factor for toxocariasis, as well as contact with dogs. The results of the current study showed that the potential risk factors of keeping dogs (Chi2 = 3.24, p = 0.07) and sleeping with dogs (Chi2 = 3.46, p = 0.06) showed a tendency toward seropositivity for T. canis but this was not a significant association. Another study of seroprevalence in children in México [14] found that frequent contact with pets was not associated with the presence of toxocariasis (Chi2 = 0.80, p = 0.37). A study in Argentina, however, found that contact with animals was an important risk factor for T. canis exposure in children (OR = 5.02, p = 0.001) [22]. These discrepancies may reflect differences between geographical locations or the size of characteristics of the sample populations between studies. Living near a cattle operation was found in the current study to show a statistically significant association (Chi2 = 5.51, p = 0.01) with the presence of anti-T. canis antibodies in children, potentially linked with the presence of stray dogs on such premises.


The results of this investigation revealed a seroprevalence of 12.02 % for T. canis in children in the municipalities of Amecameca and Chalco, in the State of México. We observed a higher percentage of seropositive males than females, and attributed this to their increased activity in recreational areas. Living near livestock farms was identified as a risk factor for exposure to T. canis, as assessed by the presence of anti-T. canis antibodies.



Special thanks to everyone who contributed to the realization of this research, colleagues and friends, and participants of the same.

We are grateful to the Secretary of Research and Advanced Studies at the University of the State of México and the Mexican Council of Science and Technology for supporting this study. Everyone involved in the study was aware of, and agreed with, submission of the manuscript for publication.


This study was funded by the University Autonomus of the State of México. The funding body had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

For NNC, CRN, LGBG and RHC, funding was provided by the Secretary of Research and Advanced Studies at the University Autonomus of the State of México.

Authors’ Affiliations

Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Amecameca University Center, Autonomous University of the State of México, Km. 2.5 Carretera Amecameca-Ayapango, 56900 Amecameca, México


  1. Swai ES, Kaaya EJ, Mshanga DA, Mbise EW. A survey on gastro intestinal parasites of non-descript dogs in and around Arusha Municipality, Tanzania. Int J Anim Veter Adv. 2010;2(3):63–7.Google Scholar
  2. Khante GS, Khan LA, Boodkhe AM, Suryawanshi PR, Majed MA, Suradkan US, et al. Epidemiological survey of gastro-intestinal parasites of non-descript dogs in Nagpur City. Vet World. 2009;2(1):22–3.Google Scholar
  3. Rinaldi L, Biggeri A, Carbone S, Musella V, Catelan D, Veneziano V, et al. Canine fecal contamination and parasitic risk in the City of Naples (Southern Italy). BMC Vet Res. 2006;2:29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Despommier D. Toxocariasis: clinical aspects, epidemiology, medical ecology, and molecular aspects. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(2):265–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Rubinsky EG, Hirata CE, Yamamoto JH, Ferreira UM. Human toxocariasis: diagnosis, worldwide seroprevalences and clinical expression of the systemic and ocular forms. Ann Trop Med Parasit. 2010;104(1):3–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wisniewska LM, Wozniakowska GT, Sobolewska DJ, Markiewicz JA, Wieczorek M. Analysis of the course and treatment of toxocariasis in children – a long-term observation. Parasitol Res. 2012;110:2363–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi D, Hoon LJ, Dong CC, Woon PS, Hee KS, Huh S. Toxocariasis and ingestion of raw cow liver in patients with eosinophilia. Korean J Parasitol. 2008;46(3):139–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen J, Min JX, Hui QS, Chun RW, Xing QZ. Canine and feline parasitic zoonoses in China. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:152.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Aydenizöz ÖM, Yaǧci BB, Erat S. The investigation of Toxocara canis eggs in coats of different dog breeds as a potential transmission route in human toxocariasis. Vet Parasitol. 2008;152(1–2):94–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tinoco GL, Barreras SA, López VG, Tamayo SAR, Quiroz RH, Melgarejo T. Seroprevalence of Larva Migrans of Toxocara canis and evaluation of associated risk factors among children in a Mexico–United States border region. Intern J Appl Res Vet Med. 2008;6(2):130–6.Google Scholar
  11. Romero NC, García CAC, Mendoza MGD, Torres CNC, Ramírez DN. Contaminación por Toxocara spp. en parques de Tulyehualco México. Rev Cient. 2009;19(3):253–6.Google Scholar
  12. Romero NC, Mendoza GD, Bustamante LP, Yanez S, Ramirez N. Contamination and viability of Toxocara sp. in feces collected from public parks, streets and dogs in Tejupilco at the subhumid tropic of Mexico. J Anim Vet Adv. 2010;9(23):2996–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. López MA, Martin G, Chamorro MC, Alonso JM. Toxocariosis en niños de una región subtropical. Medicina. 2005;65(3):226–30.Google Scholar
  14. Romero NC, Mendoza MGD, Yañez AS, Ponce MM, Bustamante MP. Prevalence and risk factors associated with Toxocara canis infection in children. Sci World J. 2013;2011:1–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chung JF, Ting WC, Huei SL, Chih HW, Yung CL, Mailynn KL, et al. Seroepidemiology of Toxocara canis infection among primary school children in the capital area of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Roldán W, Cavero Y, Espinoza Y, Jiménez S, Ruíz C. Human toxocariasis: a seroepidemiological survey in the Amazonian City of Yurimaguas, Peru. Rev Ins Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2010;52(1):37–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Negri EC, Alvares SV, Rubinsky EG, Giuffrida R. Anti-Toxocara spp. antibodies in an adult healthy population: serosurvey and risk factors in Southeast Brazil. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3(3):211–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Getaz L, Samalvides F, Breña J, Torrejón D, Maguiña C. Relación entre toxocariosis y asma: estudio prospectivo en niños del Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú. Act Med Per. 2007;24:11–20.Google Scholar
  19. Weese JS, Peregrine AS, Armstrong J. Occupational health and safety in small animal veterinary practice: Part II – Parasitic zoonotic diseases. Can Vet J. 2002;43:799–802.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Won YK, Kruszon MD, Schantz MP, Jones JL. National Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Zoonotic Toxocara spp. Infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79(4):552–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Overgaauw AM, Van ZB, Hoek CD, Fellx OY, Roelfsema J, Pinelli EC, et al. Zoonotic parasites in fecal samples and fur from dogs and cats in The Netherlands. Vet Parasitol. 2009;163(1–2):115–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bojanich MV, Fernández G, De Los Ángeles LM, Alonso JM, Azula L. Infección por Toxocara canis en población infantil vulnerable del noreste de Argentina. Enferm Emer. 2008;10(2):84–7.Google Scholar


© Cortés et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.