Seasonality and trend in blood lead levels of New York State children

Abstract

Background

Environmental exposure to lead remains a significant health problem for children. The costs of lead exposure in children are estimated to be considerably more than other childhood diseases of environmental origin. While long-term trends in blood lead levels (BLLs) among children are declining, seasonal variation persists. Cross-sectional studies have found a peak in summer months. Part of this variation may be due to increased exposure to lead paint on window sills and through increased contact with soils containing lead during the summer. The current study represents the largest published population-based study on seasonality and trends in the BLLs of children to date. In addition, the results offer a comparison of recent data on seasonality of BLLs in New York State children, to studies conducted over the past three decades.

Methods

262,687 New York State children born between 1994 and 1997 were screened for blood lead within 2 weeks of their first or second birthdays. Time series analyses of blood lead data from these children were conducted to study the seasonality and trends of BLLs.

Results

Children's blood lead values showed a distinct seasonal cycle on top of a long-term decreasing trend. The geometric mean BLL declined by about 24% for children born between 1994 and 1997. The prevalence of elevated BLLs in two-year-olds was almost twice that in one-year-olds over the time period. Nearly twice as many children had elevated BLLs in the late summer compared to late winter/early spring. In this and previous cross-sectional studies, the amount of seasonality as a proportion of the mean ranged between 15% and 30%.

Conclusion

Pediatricians should be aware of the seasonality of BLLs. For example, if a two-year-old receives a borderline result during the winter, it is possible that the levels would have been higher if he had been tested during the summer. However, physicians should continue to screen children at their normally scheduled well-child visits rather than delaying until summertime and possibly postponing the discovery of an elevated BLL. Age, season, and time trends still need to be considered in lead studies and result interpretation.

Background

Seasonal variation in children's blood lead levels has been well documented. Cross-sectional studies of children in New York City [1], New Haven [2, 3], Chicago [4], Milwaukee [5], Syracuse [6], and Los Angeles [7], and of cord blood in Boston [8] and Taipei [9], all found a primary peak in the summer months. Longitudinal studies have shown conflicting results. Summer peaks were reported in Boston [10] and Jersey City [11], but not in New York City [12] or Sydney [13]. Small longitudinal studies may not control for changes in children's exposure with age, or the educational benefit of the screening process, as well as larger cross-sectional studies.

At least part of the seasonal variation in children may be explained by increased exposure to lead in summer. Several explanations have been suggested. Researchers have measured the greatest amounts of lead dust on floors and windowsills in the summer [11]. Lead may be tracked in on shoes and blown in through windows [14, 15], and lead dust may be created when windows with lead paint are repeatedly opened and closed [16]. Children also play outdoors more in the summer, where they contact soil and street dust that may contain high levels of lead [11]. Complex interactions involving vitamin D and calcium may also play a role, but results are inconsistent [11, 17].

Exposure to lead is significant because it damages the central nervous system and adversely affects learning and behavior even at low levels [18]. Young children are at a heightened risk for several reasons [19]. Normal mouthing activity may result in the ingestion of contaminated dust and soil. Lead intake as a proportion of body mass and lead absorption are higher in children than in adults. In addition, the central nervous systems of children are more vulnerable during early childhood development. The toxicity of lead depends on the dose, the duration of exposure, and the developmental and nutritional susceptibility of the child [20, 21].

While blood lead levels are declining [22, 23], environmental exposure to lead remains a significant health problem for children. The cost of the cognitive and behavioral consequences of lead exposure is estimated to be 43.4 billion dollars annually in the United States, considerably more than other childhood diseases of environmental origin [24]. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention considers blood lead levels (BLLs) of 10 micrograms per deciliter [0.48 micromoles per liter] the threshold of concern that initiates follow-up [22]. In several inner-city urban areas in upstate New York, more than 25% of children born between 1994 and 1995 and screened prior to age two had BLLs at or above this threshold [25]. NYS requires all health care providers to screen the blood of one- and two-year-olds for lead [26]. We are using this rich database to report on the seasonality and trends in blood lead levels of NYS children, providing the largest published population-based study of seasonality to date. It is useful to compare these results with previously published reports of seasonality, since blood lead levels and sources of lead exposure have been decreasing over time.

Methods

The NYS Department of Health Laboratory Reporting System provided data on the BLLs of children born between 1994 and 1997. Data included the name, address, and date of birth of the child, the name and telephone number of a parent or guardian, the sample date, the laboratory identification number, the blood lead value, and the method by which the blood sample was obtained (fingerstick or venipuncture). Over 80 clinical laboratories reported results, but approximately 75 percent of the reports came from just 10 labs. All the laboratories were certified by participating in the New York State proficiency testing program under the Clinical Laboratory Program Improvement Amendments of 1988 [27]. We do not expect that there would be a seasonal pattern to the precision and accuracy of blood lead screening that would affect our results.

We selected only those children screened within 2 weeks of their first or second birthdays to control for the effect of age on BLLs, and to examine the sample of children screened normally at their well-care visits. If a child was screened more than once within two weeks of his first or second birthday (less than 1% of data), we used the average BLL obtained by venipuncture since these samples are less susceptible to environmental contamination than fingerstick samples [28]. We used the average fingerstick measure if no venipuncture measures were available for the child.

We analyzed the proportion of children with elevated BLLs (≥10 μg/dL) since it allows us to estimate the number of children within a community who will need follow-up blood lead screening and family lead education. Also, this proportion is not affected by extreme results that may be due to child specific traits such as pica or by laboratory detection limits. The detection limit of the test was at most 5 μg/dL for over 97% of our non-detects, and the average detection limit was 3 ug/dL. Sixteen percent of the data were reported as below the detection limit. In order to compare our results with previous studies, we calculated the geometric mean BLL. To do this, we imputed the values below the detection limit based on the observed lognormal distribution. This process may have diluted the seasonal effects by up to 5%.

The NYS Department of Health Bureau of Vital Statistics provided the number of births by month in NYS for the time period of interest. We compared the number of children tested for lead per month to these data to verify that the seasonal results were not caused by selection bias. We analyzed the blood lead data separately by collection method (fingerstick or venipuncture) to verify that the seasonal results were not related to sampling method.

We plotted the percentage of children with elevated BLLs by month/year and age group to show the seasonal variation in the data. We also calculated a long-term trend line by regressing the natural log of the percent of children with elevated BLLs over time. This transformation was selected to stabilize the variance of the cycle; the magnitude of the variation was greater when the BLLs were higher in the earlier years. We also compared our results to previously published reports to see if the seasonality of BLLs has changed over time.

Results

The final dataset contained 262,687 children. This number may be lower than the true number of children screened within two weeks of their first or second birthdays since some children screened after age two were not included in the dataset used for this analysis. Since the ratio of the number of children screened to the number of children born was consistent by month, there was no seasonality to the selection of subjects that could bias our results.

Table 1 summarizes the percent of children with BLLs greater than or equal to 10 μg/dL and the geometric mean blood lead level by month. For both measures, the maximum occurred in late summer, and the minimum occurred in late winter/early spring. The percent of children with elevated blood lead levels was 1.7 times higher in August compared to April, while the geometric mean BLL was only 1.2 times higher in August compared to April. This occurred because seasonality did not affect all of the values in the distribution equally; it affected higher levels more.

Table 1 Summary of blood lead levels by month*

In our dataset, 59% of the children were screened using venipuncture, 36.5% had fingersticks, and 4.5% had no method recorded. The fingerstick values were slightly higher than the venipuncture values, however the proportions were reasonably stable over the study period. We observed very similar magnitudes of seasonal effect when we analyzed the fingerstick and venipuncture data separately.

Figure 1 shows a more detailed picture of the prevalence of elevated BLLs by subdividing the data by age group and year. The curves show a marked seasonal cycle over a slow exponential decline. The curves have a sharper profile in the summer compared to the winter. They peak around August, and dip in March/April each year. The prevalence of elevated BLLs in two-year-olds was almost twice that in one-year-olds over the time period.

Figure 1

Percent of children with elevated blood lead levels over time, by age

Conclusion

The time series of children's blood lead values showed a distinct seasonal cycle on top of a long-term decreasing trend. Similar declines have been observed nationwide [22]. These declines have generally been attributed to public awareness, lead paint remediation, replacement of older homes, and the phase out of lead from gasoline.

The summertime elevations in BLLs that we observed are consistent with other studies. Consideration of multiple studies also revealed that the magnitude of the seasonality declines in proportion to BLLs. For example, by inspecting the graphs of Billick [1], we found that in New York City in the early seventies, the geometric mean seasonal difference was on the order of 5 μg/dL when BLLs averaged 25 μg/dL. In Milwaukee in the early nineties, the mean difference was on the order of 4 μg/dL when BLLs were 15 μg/dL [5]. We observed a geometric mean seasonal difference of less than l μg/dL with BLLs around 4 μg/dL. In nine studies over the past thirty years, the amount of seasonality as a proportion of the mean consistently ranged between 15% and 30% [1, 3–9].

The decrease in BLLs over time suggests that exposures have changed, while continuing to support the current hypotheses regarding seasonality. Blood lead levels may be higher in summer due to increased indoor and outdoor exposure to lead in dust and soil. Source apportionment has shown that indoor lead is due to tracked-in soil, street dust, aerosol deposition, and lead paint [29].

Pediatricians should be aware of the seasonal phenomenon when interpreting blood lead results. For example, if a two-year-old receives a borderline result during the winter months, it is possible that the levels would have been higher if he had been tested during the summer. A large number of children near 10 μg/dL could be affected. However, physicians should continue to provide information on lead poisoning prevention and screen children at their normally scheduled well-child visits rather than delaying until summertime and possibly postponing the discovery of an elevated BLL. Age, season, and time trends still need to be considered in lead studies and result interpretation.