- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Isolated enophthalmos: an uncommon gateway to orbital tumors in pediatrics: 9 month-old female presenting with isolated enophthalmos as the unique sign of a metastatic orbital tumor: a case report
© Touhami and Bui-Quoc; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 12 January 2014
- Accepted: 27 August 2014
- Published: 23 September 2014
If extra-axial proptosis is by far the most common symptom of infantile malignant orbital tumors, enophthalmos is a rare and undocumented sign. We report the first case of a pediatric metastatic orbital tumor revealed by enophthalmos alone.
A 9-month-old girl was diagnosed with isolated right-sided enophthalmos. An orbital tumor was suspected and computed tomography undertaken showing osteolysis and periosteal reaction of orbital walls, malar bones and zygomatic arches. A Thoracic- abdominal CT scan confirmed a stage-4 neuroblastoma.
Enophthalmos can be the sole symptom of an orbital tumor and should lead to immediate imaging assessment. This association is not well known in pediatrics but is relevant to insure the best prognosis.
- Infantile orbital tumors
- Pediatric tumors
Exophthalmos is the most common symptom of orbital tumors in adults and children given the narrowness of their bony structures. However, more scarce signs need to be recognized. Among these, enophthalmos has already been described in adults  but has never been reported as a sole indicator of orbital neoplasms in pediatrics. We report the first case of a pediatric metastatic neuroblastoma revealed by enophthalmos alone and stress the importance of this sign as a revealing symptom of orbital tumors in children.
Exophthalmos is the most commonly known symptom of orbital tumors in adults and children  and is, usually easy to recognize, and always brings to mind the possibility of a neoplasm. Conversely, if a few cases have been described in adults [1, 3–5], there is only very little knowledge of the association between enophthlamos and orbital tumors in children  ; because of the scarcity of both entities and the difficulty in clinically objectivizing this symptom. In fact, enophthalmos is a posterior displacement of the eyeball within the orbit but its diagnosis is tricky because there is no agreement on a clear definition, especially in children. For example, Yip set a 14 mm limit  while diagnosis is not made formal until after orbital CT scan measures an oculo-orbital index (OOI) < 30 % (OOI = Prebicanthal eyeball length/overall eyeball length x100). Nonetheless, a large majority of specialists agree on the importance of clinical and exophthalmometric judgment over imaging assessment.
When this symptom is identified, the next step is to rule out differential diagnoses: contralateral proptosis, ipsilateral ptosis (including Horner syndrome), microphthalmia and phthisis bulbi.
Once those are excluded, the cause needs to be sought. MacFaul stated in his “System of ophthalmology” that unlike exophthalmos, enophthalmos could not lead to a fatal outcome ; because his classification failed to mention orbital tumors as a possible etiology. He stated that orbit topography is such that infiltrative processes are more likely to push outwards and induce proptosis . Most of the time, this statement is true, however in rare cases; neoplastic cells can infiltrate extraocular muscles, alter orbital fat structure and destroy bony architecture leading to a backwards eyeball traction .
Based on this, three possible mechanisms have been suggested to explain the occurrence of enophthalmos . First, structural modifications: post traumatic bone fractures, congenital bony defects; silent sinus syndrome and tumors can crack the orbit wall and modify the eyeball position [4, 5]. Second: eyeball backwards retraction consecutive to muscle and/or fat tissue infiltration [4, 5]. Fitting into this category are adult cases of enophthalmos, which can reveal various types of orbital neoplasms. Affected patients are usually females with breast cancer [1, 5]. When the musculature is invaded, areas of fibrosis are created causing posterior traction of the eyeball. In such cases, enophthalmos is usually not isolated and is associated with a palpable mass, impaired eye motility, diplopia, orbital pain, drooping of the upper eyelid etc.. [1, 3–5]. Third: fat atrophy (such as in senile fat atrophy and orbital varices) might induce an eyeball displacement by shrinking the orbital content [4, 5].In the present case, the three mechanisms could have caused a posterior displacement of the eyeball. By cracking the orbital wall (Figure 1b), the neuroblastoma modified the eyeball position dragging it downwards and backwards. Additionally, the orbital cavity seemed to be increased on the right side as compared with the left side. In Figure 1b, the osteolytic process induced fractures of the right orbit’s inferior wall and osteocondensation with bone neoformation at the superior wall of the left orbit associated with soft tissue inflammation, which denotes less space available for the right globe as compared with the left globe, possibly explaining the enophthalmos of the right eye. Additionally, muscle and fat infiltration by the neuroblastoma could have induced local areas of retractile fibrosis pushing the globe backwards, as shown in Figure 1b where the right globe seems to be smaller than the left globe whereas the cross-section is perfectly vertical, denoting a backwards retraction of the right eye. Third, (though this is probably less likely), the growth of the neuroblastoma could have induced a shrinking of the orbit’s other components including fat. As seen in Figure 1a, the orbital content is less prominent in the right side as compared to the left side, causing a backwards displacement of the eye.
Enophthalmos can be the only symptom of a neoplastic process and should lead to immediate imaging assessment to rule out an orbital tumor and avoid the disastrous outcome of a delayed diagnosis.
All examinations and investigations in this case report followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee of the French Society of Ophthalmology also approved them. Informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardians for publication of this case report and accompanying images.
- Novitskaya E, Rene C: Enophthalmos as a sign of metastatic breast carcinoma. CMAJ. 2013, 185 (13): 1159-10.1503/cmaj.120726.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- George JL, Marchal JC: Les tumeurs d’orbite de l’enfant: examen clinique, paraclinique, diagnostic et particularités évolutives. Neurochirurgie. 2010, 56: 244-248. 10.1016/j.neuchi.2010.02.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Keyser J, Bruyland M, de Greve J, Bernheim J, Ebinger G: Enophthalmos as a rare manifestation of metastatic orbital involvement. Postgrad Med J. 1985, 61: 149-152. 10.1136/pgmj.61.712.149.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cline RA, Rootman J: Enophthalmos: a clinical review. Ophthalmology. 1984, 91: 229-237. 10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34299-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larmande A, Rossazza C: Métastases orbitaires enophtalmiantes. Ophthalmologica. 1979, 179: 25-31. 10.1159/000308860.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yip CC, Gonzalez-Candial M, Jain A, Goldberg RA, McCann JD: Lagophthalmos in enophthalmic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005, 89: 676-678. 10.1136/bjo.2004.052845.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- MacFaul PA: Lacrimal, Orbital and Paraorbital Diseases. System of Ophthalmology, Vol XIII, The Ocular Adnexa, Part II. Edited by: Duke-Elder S. 1974Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/14/237/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.