- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Measuring transcutaneous bilirubin: a comparative analysis of three devices on a multiracial population
© Raimondi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 May 2011
Accepted: 1 March 2012
Published: 14 June 2012
Hyperbilirubinemia can lead to potentially irreversible bilirubin-induced neurotoxicity. Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) determination has become a valuable aid in non invasive screening of neonatal jaundice.
The aim of this study is to compare the performance of three most widespread transcutaneous bilirubinometers on a multiracial population of term and late pre-term neonates.
Bilirubin concentration was determined using traditional photometric determination and transcutaneously with Bilicheck, BiliMed and JM-103, in random order.
Total serum bilirubin (TSB) was determined over a wide concentration range (15,8–0,7 mg/dl) with a mean of 9,5 mg/dl. Related TcB values using Bilicheck (TcB-BC), BiliMed (TcB-BM), and JM-103 (TcB-JM) are reported in Table 1.
A multiracial population of 289 neonates was enrolled with a gestational age ranging from 35 to 41 weeks; birth weight ranging from 1800to 4350 grams; hours of life ranging from 4 to 424. In the total study population correlation analysis using Pearson coefficients showed good results for Bilicheck (r = 0.86) and JM-103 (r = 0.85) but poor for BiliMed (r = 0,70). Similar results were found for the non-Caucasian neonates subgroup. Bilicheck and JM-103 had a greater area under the curve than BiliMed when TSB =14 mg/dl was chosen as a threshold value both for the total study population and the non-Caucasian subgroup.
Bilicheck and JM-103, but not BiliMed, are equally reliable screening tools for hyperbilirubinemia in our multiracial neonatal population.
Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) determination has become a valuable aid in avoiding significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia  and has significantly reduced the number of heel stick blood samplings and their complications . Current technology analyses the light reflected by the skin and the subcutaneous tissue providing a useful alternative measurement for total serum bilirubin (TSB). Neonatal skin colour and thickness represents important variables in TcB measurements. Different devices have been individually validated versus spectrophotometric or high pressure liquid chromatography determination of TSB, often on neonates with a single ethnic background .
To provide useful clinical information, we compared the performance of the three most widespread transcutaneous bilirubinometers on a multiracial population of term and late pre-term neonates.
Infants born at the well baby nursery of the University “Federico II” of Naples with gestational age over 35 weeks were enrolled between January and December 2009. The investigation protocol was approved by the local ethical committee and parental consent was obtained.
Infants with Rh or ABO isoimmunisation, major congenital malformations, haemoglobinopathies or evidence of liver disease were excluded from the study.
Infants with post-natal age from 4 to 75 hours were measured TSB by an experienced resident (SL) as ordered by the attending clinician unaware of the study purpose. Samples were obtained from heelsticks in capillary tubes, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for five minutes and then read by a direct spectrophotometer (GB13A, Bertocchi Elettromedicali, Cremona, Italy). Spectrophotometry was used as a reference as it is the technique used in daily routine and has better agreement with high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) than any other technique .
Within 20 minutes before TSB determination, TcB was measured on the infant’s forehead, protected from direct sunlight and avoiding areas with hair, bruises, nevi or other skin anomalies.
We used three well known transcutaneous bilirubinometers according to the manifacturer’s instructions. Bilicheck (SpectRX, Norcross, GA) was calibrated using a Bilical before each measurement, calculated averaging five readings. The device scans the whole spectrum of visible light and automatically subtracts the light reflected by confounding factors like haemoglobin or melanin. BiliMed (Medick, S.A. France) operates by ten light emitting diodes that form a single beam when hitting the newborn skin. A silicon diode captures the reflected light and the internal software calculates the highest intensity for every wavelength range. BiliMed was used as recommended at 2 cm from the neonate’s forehead. JM-103 (Draeger Medical Systems, Inc., Telford, PA) uses 2 wavelengths and a dual optical path system; each measurement was calculated averaging five readings.
All measurements were performed in the ambient morning light of the nursery, in random order according to a computer generated randomization table.
Data were analyzed using MedCalc software v.11 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). Linear regression analysis, Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots and receiver operating curve (ROC) were performed.
Basic characteristic and clinical variables of infants with hyperbilirubinemia
Mean birthweight (gr)
Gestational age (week range)
Mean TSB (mg/dl)
Mean TcB Bilicheck (mg/dl)
Mean TcB Minolta JM103 (mg/dl)
Mean TcB Bilimed (mg/dl)
In a comparative evaluation of the three most common transcutaneous bilirubinometers we showed that Bilicheck and JM-103 but not BiliMed are reliable screening tools for moderate neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The latter device resulted inferior to Bilicheck in previous studies on Caucasian populations [5, 6]. We found that on non-Caucasians BiliMed looses further ground to JM-103 and Bilicheck, the two transcutaneous bilirubinometers with the largest literature and broadest distribution. We also provided the first direct comparison of Bilicheck and JM-103 on a multiracial population as previous authors investigated these technologies on Asian or Caucasian infants [7–9].
In the present study, both JM-103 and Bilicheck resulted equally accurate screening tools over the range of concentrations tested, regardless of the skin pigmentation. JM-103, in particular, represents an improvement of a previous device. In the study of Robertson et al. JM-102 was less accurate than Bilicheck and influenced by the skin color. In the present study, JM-103 had a good performance on dark skinned infants, required no disposables to calibrate and was quicker to operate than Bilicheck.
Looking at the Bland Altman plots, the three devices had a tendency to overestimation on higher end of the tested concentration range. Although this may be per se protective against the clinical damage of hyperbilirubinemia, one would expect that newer technologies should be more accurate therefore expanding the concentration range where a TSB determination can be spared. We acknowledge a limitation of the study as we do not provide comparative data on preterm infants. Previous studies have shown that transcutaneous bilirubin evaluation can be useful on this population which is at increased risk of clinical damage as early as 24 weeks of gestational age . It will be interesting to compare data on preterm infants since, as in the present study on late preterm and term infants, devices using different technologies may have variable performances. Clinicians need to be aware of these differences.
In our multiracial neonatal population Bilicheck and JM-103, but not BiliMed, are equally reliable screening tools for hyperbilirubinemia.
- Maisels MJ: Historical perspectives: transcutaneous bilirubinometry. NeoReviews. 2006, 7: e217-e225. 10.1542/neo.7-5-e217.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maisels MJ, Kring E: Transcutaneous bilirubinometry decreases the need for serum bilirubin measurements and saves money. Pediatrics. 1997, 99: 599-601. 10.1542/peds.99.4.599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bertini G, Pratesi S, Cosenza E, Dani C: Transcutaneous bilirubin measurement: evaluation of Bilitest. Neonatology. 2008, 93: 101-105. 10.1159/000107351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kazmierczak SC, Robertson AF, Catrou PG, Briley KP, Kreamer BL, Gourley GR: Direct spectrophotometry method for measurement of bilirubin in newborns: comparison with HPLC and an automated diazo method. Clin Chem. 2002, 48: 1096-1097.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Luca D, Zecca E, Corsello M, Tiberi E, Semeraro C, Romagnoli C: Attempt to improve transcutaneous bilirubinometry: a double-blind study of Medick BiliMed versus Respironics BiliCheck. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008, 93 (2): F135-F139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karen T, Bucher HU, Fauchere JC: Comparison of a new transcutaneous bilirubinometer (Bilimed®) with serum bilirubin measurements in preterm and full-term infants. BMC Pediatr. 2009, 9: 70-10.1186/1471-2431-9-70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sanpavat S, Nuchprayoon I: Comparison of two transcutaneous bilirubinometers - Minolta AirShields Jaundice Meter JM103 and Spectrx Bilicheck - in Thai neonates. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005, 36 (6): 1533-1537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qualter YM, Allen NM, Corcoran JD, O’Donovan DJ: Transcutaneous bilirubin - comparing the accuracy of BiliChek® and JM 103® in a regional postnatal unit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011, 24 (2): 267-270. 10.3109/14767058.2010.484471.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Panburana J, Boonkasidach S, Rearkyai S: Accuracy of transcutaneous bilirubinometry compare to total serum bilirubin measurement. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010, 93 (Suppl 2): S81-S86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt ET, Wheeler CA, Jackson GL, Engle WD: Evaluation of transcutaneous bilirubinometry in preterm neonates. J Perinatol. 2009, 29: 564-569. 10.1038/jp.2009.38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/70/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.