Table 2 Pedro scale for quality appraisal
s/n | STUDIES | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | (Akbari-Chehrehbargh, Tavafian, & Montazeri, 2020) [25] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
2 | (Dullien, Grifka, & Jansen, 2018) [16] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
3 | (Rodriguez-Garcia, Lopez-Minarro, & Santonja, 2013) [21] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
4 | (Habybabady R. H., et al., 2012) [18] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
5 | (Vidal-Conti & Galmes-Panades, 2022) [26] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
6 | (Vidal, et al., 2013) [27] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
7 | (Cardon, de Clercq, Geldhof, Verstraete, & de Bourdeaudhuij, 2007) [28] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
8 | (Kovacs, et al., 2011) [19] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 |