Skip to main content

Table 2 Critical Appraisal of studies using QI-MQCS [23]

From: Quality improvement in the golden hour for premature infants: a scoping review

References

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

Total score

Croop et al. [32]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

14

Peleg et al. [17]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

10

Harriman et al. [33]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

10

Ashmeade et al. [18]

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

10

Lambeth et al. [34]

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

12

Vergales et al. [21]

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

10

Reuter et al. [19]

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

0

1

0

10

Castrodale et al. [20]

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

9

Wallingford et al. [31]

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

7

Reynolds et al. [35]

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

8

  1. (1) Organizational motivation, (2) intervention rationale, (3) intervention description, (4) organizational characteristics, (5) implementation, (6) study design, (7) comparator, (8) data source, (9) timing, (10) adherence/fidelity, (11) health outcomes, (12) organizational readiness, (13) penetration/reach, (14) sustainability, (15) spread, (16) limitations