Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics and characteristics, as well as differences between responder group and non-responder group (mean ± standard deviations)

From: Long-term effectiveness and safety of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy: a real-world study

Category

Total population (n = 105)

Responder group

(n = 50)

Non-responder group

(n = 55)

t /χ2

p-value

Age (years)

7.6 ± 4.5

7.3 ± 4.7

7.8 ± 4.5

-0.582

0.562

Male gender, n (%)

64 (61.0)

34 (68.0)

30 (54.5)

3.882

< 0.05*

Body mass index (kg·m− 2)

18.1 ± 4.1

17.8 ± 3.4

18.3 ± 4.6

-0.657

0.513

Duration of epilepsy (years)

3.4 ± 2.8

3.1 ± 2.5

3.6 ± 2.7

-1.078

0.284

Medication time (years)

0.6 ± 0.5

0.6 ± 0.4

0.7 ± 0.5

-0.878

0.382

Type of seizure, n (%)

     

 Generalized onset

32 (30.5)

15 (30.0)

17 (30.9)

0.024

0.877

 Focal onset

12 (11.4)

6 (12.0)

6 (10.9)

0.061

0.805

 Combined generalized and focal onset

43 (41.0)

21 (42.0)

22 (40.0)

0.083

0.773

 Unknow onset

18 (17.1)

8 (16.0)

10 (18.2)

0.142

0.707

Maintenance dose (mg·kg− 1·d− 1)

7.8 ± 2.4

8.4 ± 2.4

7.3 ± 2.3

2.375

< 0.05*

Concomitant ASMs #

     

 Valproic acid

92 (38.3)

47 (41.2)

45 (35.7)

0.528

0.467

 Levetiracetam

62 (25.8)

32 (28.1)

30 (23.8)

0.416

0.519

 Oxcarbazepine

51 (21.3)

20 (17.5)

31 (24.6)

1.540

0.215

 Lamotrigine

21 (8.7)

10 (8.8)

11 (8.7)

-

1.000

 Perampanel

6 (2.5)

2 (1.7)

2 (1.6)

-

1.000

 Zonisamide

5 (2.1)

2 (1.7)

3 (2.4)

-

1.000

 Phenobarbital

2 (0.8)

0 (0)

2 (1.6)

2.020

0.155

 Topiramate

2 (0.8)

0 (0)

2 (1.6)

2.020

0.155

 Clonazepam

1 (0.4)

1 (0.9)

0 (0)

1.005

0.316

The number of ASMs were used before LCM, n (%)

     

 One ASMs

43 (41.0)

27 (54.0)

16 (29.1)

12.872

< 0.001**

 Two ASMs

40 (38.1)

15 (30.0)

25 (45.5)

5.164

< 0.05*

 Three ASMs

18 (17.1)

7 (14.0)

11 (20.0)

1.276

0.259

 Four ASMs

4 (3.8)

1 (2.0)

3 (5.4)

1.332

0.248

  1. # One patient may have two or more ASMs
  2. Comparison between effective cases, * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.001