Skip to main content

Table 4 Correlations between TL (entire season) and the changes of physical fitness

From: Does maturity estimation, 2D:4D and training load measures explain physical fitness changes of youth football players?

 

S&R

VIFT

Mod.505 COD

PP

TM

r = .02 | p = .92

r = .15 | p = .47

r = .33 | p = .11

r = .17 | p = .43

TS

r=-.03 | p = .89

r=-.01 | p = .96

r = .09 | p = .68

r = .03 | p = .91

mTL

r = .15 | p = .48

r = .18 | p = .39

r = .20 | p = .34

r = .19 | p = .38

wTL

r=-.33 | p = .11

r=-.02 | p = .92

r=-.12 | p = .56

r=-.12 | p = .58

5d-AVG

r = .04 | p = .83

r=-.10 | p = .60

r = .36 | p = .07

r = .02 | p = .89

  1. TM training monotony, TS training strain, mTL mean training load, wTL weekly training load, 5d-AVG 5 day average, S&R sit and reach test, VIFT, final velocity of 30 − 15 intermittent fitness test, Mod. 505 COD modified 505 change of direction
Back to article page

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us