Skip to main content

Table 4 Evaluation of agreement between OX-NDA and BSID-III

From: Construction and validation of the Oxford Neurodevelopment Assessment (OX-NDA) in 1-year-old Brazilian children

OX-NDA Domain

(n = 104)

BSID-III composite scores

(n = 104)

Correlation analysis

Bland Altman Analysis

Linear regression of difference scores1

Comparison of OX-NDA domain scores between children scoring ≥85 and < 85 on the BSID-III

Pearson’s r (p)

ICC (95% CI, p)

Bias

Lower limit of agreement

Upper limit of agreement

r

Children scoring < 85 on the BSID-III

Mean (SD)

Children scoring ≥85 on the BSID-III

Mean (SD)

t (p)

Cognition

Cognition

0.50** (< 0.001)

0.66** (0.50-0.77, < 0.001)

0.10

−67.88

−23.88

0.16**

50.42 (10.66)

65.82 (9.77)

3.08** (< 0.001)

Motor

Motor

0.52** (< 0.001)

0.68** (0.53-0.78, < 0.001)

0.36

−42.33

0.84

0.27**

60.31 (14.28)

80.68 (9.54)

6.09** (< 0.001)

Language

Language

0.18 (0.07)

0.30* (− 0.04 – 0.52, 0.041)

0.08

−77.42

−24.28

0.28**

53.12 (11.26)

61.72 (9.49)

1.54 (0.13)

  1. OX-NDA The Oxford Neurodevelopment Assessment; BSID-III: The Bayley Scales of Infant Development III edition; Pearson’s r: Pearson’s correlation coefficients; ICC: interclass correlation coefficients; CI: Confidence intervals; t: independent sample t test
  2. **p < 0.001, *p < 0.05
  3. 1Difference scores were calculated as BSID-III minus OX-NDA scores