Skip to main content

Table 4 Adjusted proportional hazards regression modeling of risk of mental health diagnosis over the eight-year follow-up period associated with pet exposure

From: Impact of pet dog or cat exposure during childhood on mental illness during adolescence: a cohort study

 

Pet Dog at baselinea

Cumulative exposure to pet dogb

Cumulative Exposure to pet catb

Cumulative exposure to most attached petb,c

 

N

HR (95% CI)

p

N

HR (95% CI)

p

N

HR (95% CI)

p

N

HR (95% CI)

p

Anxiety diagnosis

605

0.88 (0.63–1.22)

0.44

233

0.84 (0.60–1.17)

0.30

233

0.93 (0.71–1.21)

0.58

220

0.57 (0.38–0.85)

0.006

Any MH diagnosis

571

0.74 (0.56–0.99)

0.04

220

0.74 (0.54–1.02)

0.06

220

0.87 (0.68–1.11)

0.28

204

0.64 (0.44–0.91)

0.013

Any MH diagnosis with psychotropic prescription

571

0.79 (0.55–1.15)

0.23

220

0.83 (0.57–1.21)

0.33

220

0.78 (0.56–1.10)

0.16

204

0.69 (0.44–1.08)

0.106

  1. aadjusted for age, sex, zip code level poverty and baseline SCARED 5 ≥ 3
  2. badjusted for baseline SCARED5 ≥ 3 and household income
  3. climited to subjects with at least one pet during follow-up