Peer Review reports
From: The value of urinary gonadotropins in the diagnosis of central precocious puberty: a meta-analysis
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 23 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Kaplowitz |
| 20 May 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Tao Liu |
| 3 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Tao Liu |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 May 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 7 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Tao Liu |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Tao Liu |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Tao Liu |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 15 Jun 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Kaplowitz |
| 1 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 5 Jul 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Tao Liu |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 5 Jul 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Jul 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Jul 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12887-022-03481-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.